Yahoo Archive: Page 17 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 17 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 801 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: A Fan’s View, the Book (was Write-up about Marty)
Group: runacc Message: 802 From: Bruno Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: A Fan’s View, the Book
Group: runacc Message: 803 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/22/2004
Subject: Re: A Fan’s View, the Book (was Write-up about Marty)
Group: runacc Message: 804 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/22/2004
Subject: Re: Mr. Mike’s responses (was A Fan’s View, the Book)
Group: runacc Message: 805 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 7/23/2004
Subject: CC26? at San Diego Coronation, 8/7/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 806 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/23/2004
Subject: Re: CC26? at San Diego Coronation, 8/7/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 807 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/30/2004
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Anime at Costume-Con]
Group: runacc Message: 808 From: David Doering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 809 From: davedoering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 810 From: martingear Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 811 From: martingear Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 812 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 813 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 814 From: Byron Connell Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 815 From: Byron Connell Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 816 From: David Doering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 817 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 818 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 819 From: srabba Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 820 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 821 From: David Doering Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 822 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships
Group: runacc Message: 823 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 8/12/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 824 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 8/12/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates
Group: runacc Message: 825 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 8/18/2004
Subject: CC26? at WorldCon, 9/2/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 826 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/19/2004
Subject: [Fwd: [ICG-D] Fliers & stuph]
Group: runacc Message: 827 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 9/3/2004
Subject: CC26? at Chicago Coronation, 9/18/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 828 From: davedoering Date: 9/8/2004
Subject: CC23 RATE DEADLINE
Group: runacc Message: 829 From: davedoering Date: 9/9/2004
Subject: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 830 From: martingear Date: 9/9/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 831 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/10/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 832 From: Elaine Mami Date: 9/10/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 833 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/12/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 834 From: davedoering Date: 9/13/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Group: runacc Message: 835 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/16/2004
Subject: promotional materials…
Group: runacc Message: 836 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/20/2004
Subject: reminder for CC24 folks
Group: runacc Message: 837 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/22/2004
Subject: New CC25 Website!!
Group: runacc Message: 838 From: David Doering Date: 9/22/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Group: runacc Message: 839 From: axejudge Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Group: runacc Message: 840 From: axejudge Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Group: runacc Message: 841 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Group: runacc Message: 842 From: srabba Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 843 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 844 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 845 From: David Doering Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 846 From: martingear Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 847 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 848 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 849 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Group: runacc Message: 850 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 801 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: A Fan’s View, the Book (was Write-up about Marty)
As I said last time, Nora and I are making the effort to get some background
on the anime cosplay culture. We went out and rented 4 videos.
Ironically, what appeals to us/is avaiable at our local Blockbuster is
limited, bt the ones we got are pretty good, from all accounts. I guess
we’ll need to see some titles where the cosplayers are recreating character
designs.

And the report about Marty on that website segues nicely into my book
review. While I was flitting about on that site, I discovered this Kevin
Lillard has produced a fan pub about said Cosplayers and sells it on his
site. It’s an 80 sheet 8.5 x 11.5″ book printed via inkjet of interviews by
Catherine Schaff-Stump (I’ve heard of her somewhere, but just not sure
where) featuring quite a few costumers, with page after page of nice quality
photos. You can tell there was a set form to the interviews, because some
of the same questions and answers keep coming through. But, from what I’ve
read, I think there are a number of the more serious costumers among them
who might be open to another venue to show off their talents. The timing of
our initiative to reach these people may be just about right.

Some observations: As I think someone has already observed, these guys are
mimicing the progress of the general community of from around the late ’70s
and ’80s. There’s an explosion of interest and attendance to these cons to
such an extent in some cases that there are those complaining the events are
gettng TOO big. Already, there are a number of stage shows (masquerades,
cosplay skits, etc.) that are havng to limit the number of entries. Sound
familiar.?

Several people remarked that they wish the judging was more fair. Two or
three people called for a divisions system. One of the intereview featured
the couple who showed up at CC 18(?) and were apparently impressed by the
experience. Looking through the book again, I think one of them was the
Tikki Marty mentioned.

Other interview comments: There are a LOT people wanting to learn how to
make armor — many of them would like to vac-form. Price is a big factor.
Nonetheless, I see a possible opening for those of us with plastic armor and
accessories experience to share knowledge and spread the word about our
education focus.

Another observaton: Several of them do not sew, or only do so on a
rudimentary level.

Age: I don’t know if the book is representative, but most were in their
early 20s, with a sprinkling of older people. The few older people in it
may be known to some of us here, expecially Andy, since I would say the bulk
of the costumers interviewed are from either the Midwest and East.

Two people “would like to see costuming respected more at conventions. ‘A
lot of people think it’s a joke, and they do t just to have fun.’ christina
discussed what she ahs seen at conventions. “If you put the costumes all
together, there are some really great costumes, and they’re designed
beautifully, and they’re sewn so amazingly. People just overlook it, and I
thin there should be more respect for the costume world'”. She goes on to
say she’d like to see the term “cosplay” go away. Not sure if she’s not in
the minority there. Of couse, she’s not too keen onthe competitions,
either. Sounds more like the furry costumer attitude.

The more “serious” costumers are beginning to take notice of the ego-boo
from gettng a workmanship award, so I think Marty’s stint was just the
thing.

Overall, I think that the toughest part will be convincing these folk (who
have the wherewithall to travel and afford a CC) to step outside their
familiar venues and discover there are a whole lot more people who would
love to see them and appreciate their works on a whole different level.

I recommend any committee heads who don’t have an anime con connection but
plan to try to draw from this community to pick this book up and read it.
Plus, like I said — lots of good costume photos.
http://www.fansview.com/book.htm

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 802 From: Bruno Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: A Fan’s View, the Book

> As I said last time, Nora and I are making the effort to get some

background

> on the anime cosplay culture. We went out and rented 4 videos.
> Ironically, what appeals to us/is avaiable at our local Blockbuster is
> limited, bt the ones we got are pretty good, from all accounts. I guess
> we’ll need to see some titles where the cosplayers are recreating

character

> designs.
>

If you look around on cosplayers personal websites, many of them will
include pictures of the source and of their finished costumes. Some include
more information than that.

> Other interview comments: There are a LOT people wanting to learn how to
> make armor — many of them would like to vac-form. Price is a big factor.
> Nonetheless, I see a possible opening for those of us with plastic armor

and

> accessories experience to share knowledge and spread the word about our
> education focus.

Consistently, the most often “how-to” questions I’ve heard have been for
armor and wings. Here’s a cosplayer who’s done some great armor. I
particularly like the medieval style plate armor seen in Project 1
http://amethyst-angel.com/armormaking.html

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 803 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/22/2004
Subject: Re: A Fan’s View, the Book (was Write-up about Marty)

Catherine (and husband Bryon Stump) are Iowa costumers who do (or used to,
anyway) a lot of comic-based costumes. They are/were regulars at Demicon,
but we’ve missed contacting them the last couple of years. Both are teachers.

P & S

>While I was flitting about on that site, I discovered this Kevin
>Lillard has produced a fan pub about said Cosplayers and sells it on his
>site. It’s an 80 sheet 8.5 x 11.5″ book printed via inkjet of interviews by
>Catherine Schaff-Stump (I’ve heard of her somewhere, but just not sure
>where) featuring quite a few costumers, with page after page of nice quality
>photos.

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 804 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/22/2004
Subject: Re: Mr. Mike’s responses (was A Fan’s View, the Book)

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] A Fan’s View, the Book

> > As I said last time, Nora and I are making the effort to get some
> background
> > on the anime cosplay culture. We went out and rented 4 videos.
> > Ironically, what appeals to us/is avaiable at our local Blockbuster is
> > limited, bt the ones we got are pretty good, from all accounts. I guess
> > we’ll need to see some titles where the cosplayers are recreating
> character
> > designs.
> >
>
> If you look around on cosplayers personal websites, many of them will
> include pictures of the source and of their finished costumes. Some
include
> more information than that.

Mmm. I rather do something that hasn’t been done recently. Trying to find
something that way sounds like more work than I want to go to. Besides, if
it’s been done well, I don’t feel like repeating it.
>
>
> > Other interview comments: There are a LOT people wanting to learn how
to
> > make armor — many of them would like to vac-form. Price is a big
factor.
> > Nonetheless, I see a possible opening for those of us with plastic armor
> and
> > accessories experience to share knowledge and spread the word about our
> > education focus.
>
> Consistently, the most often “how-to” questions I’ve heard have been for
> armor and wings. Here’s a cosplayer who’s done some great armor. I
> particularly like the medieval style plate armor seen in Project 1
> http://amethyst-angel.com/armormaking.html

Yeah! I saw that one night during my research of various things Cosplay.
That’s very useful, and I’m going to maybe use that perhaps as a basis for
something I”ll do for a con. Maybe something for something original, too.

Bruce

>

 

Group: runacc Message: 805 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 7/23/2004
Subject: CC26? at San Diego Coronation, 8/7/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at San Diego Coronation


Saturday August 7, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.

Notes:
Award Ribbons, fliers



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 806 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/23/2004
Subject: Re: CC26? at San Diego Coronation, 8/7/2004, 12:00 am

On Jul 23, 2004, at 4:59 PM, runacc@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> CC26? at San Diego Coronation

Please disregard, haven’t the time, inclination, or budget…


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 807 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/30/2004
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Anime at Costume-Con]
If you’re looking for a distribution point for flyers, you might try Lisa…

Just the messenger…

Cheers,

Betsy

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Anime at Costume-Con
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:56:21 -0400
From: Lisa A Ashton <lisa58@juno.com>
Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com

Good job Dany! And great job with your costume!

I will be taking flyers for CC ( a futureCC) to the Known World Costume
Symposium. If there are flyers for CC23 available, feel free to send
them to me and I will make certain that they are distributed among people
that care about costuming, esp. historical. Are you there, Utah? I’ll
be driving to this event, so I have mucho space in the car.

Yours in costuming, Lisa a.

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years – Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month – visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Yahoo! Groups Links



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 808 From: David Doering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Novice Award Memberships
A question has come up about our program of awarding the Best in Class:
Novice winner a free membership to Costume-Con. The question is: what if
they have already purchased a membership to CC23?

Should we refund the purchased membership? This would seem to be the best
solution from the point of view of the costumer, plus it fulfills the
original purpose of the award–create a lot of excitement and enthusiasm in
the next generation to come to CC.

However, refunds are always painful as they take away from our limited
resources. In other contests, like winning a car, it doesn’t matter if you
just bought a new one, you only choice is to sell or give away the car. So
that is an option for us.

I wouldn’t worry about this, but if we continue with this program (as Andy
and Kevin say they will) then we don’t want to set a wrong precedent here.

Thoughts?

Dave Doering
Co-Chair
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org

 

Group: runacc Message: 809 From: davedoering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Program Participant Rates
We have a question on comping program participants. What has been the
past practice for programming and concom rates for memberships to CC?

I think we need some good rules of thumb so as not to be unfair or
unreasonable either in support of good people on our programming.

Dave Doering
Co-Chair
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org

 

Group: runacc Message: 810 From: martingear Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates

Given the small size of the con and the tightness of the budget, I don’t
remember any CostumeCons comping the program participants. It is
possible that if you were able to get a big name costume designer or
make up artist to come in just to do a couple of panels you would
probably comp them, but for the most part I don’t think that program
participants are or should be comped. All of the Costume Cons that I
have been involved with running have charged everyone including the
committee a membership fee although some of them have charged the
committee the lowest membership rate. In the event that the con makes a
profit, then it is up to the con com as to whether the committee gets
their memberships refunded or whether all the profit gets passed on to
future cons. If you are putting on the con as a part of a 501(c)3
organization there are certain restrictions as to what you can do with
any profits and how you can compensate officers who are also members of
the organization, so the safest thing is to charge everyone (with the
exception of the afore mentioned professionals) a membership and see if
there is any money to disburse at the end.

Marty

davedoering wrote:

>We have a question on comping program participants. What has been the
>past practice for programming and concom rates for memberships to CC?
>
>I think we need some good rules of thumb so as not to be unfair or
>unreasonable either in support of good people on our programming.
>
>Dave Doering
>Co-Chair
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 811 From: martingear Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

First Choice: Give them a refund. You shouldn’t have too many of them.
Second Choice: Suggest that they give their membership to a friend.
(Much less desirable)

My $0.05 (this is Washington & an election year!)

^M^

David Doering wrote:

>A question has come up about our program of awarding the Best in Class:
>Novice winner a free membership to Costume-Con. The question is: what if
>they have already purchased a membership to CC23?
>
>Should we refund the purchased membership? This would seem to be the best
>solution from the point of view of the costumer, plus it fulfills the
>original purpose of the award–create a lot of excitement and enthusiasm in
>the next generation to come to CC.
>
>However, refunds are always painful as they take away from our limited
>resources. In other contests, like winning a car, it doesn’t matter if you
>just bought a new one, you only choice is to sell or give away the car. So
>that is an option for us.
>
>I wouldn’t worry about this, but if we continue with this program (as Andy
>and Kevin say they will) then we don’t want to set a wrong precedent here.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Dave Doering
>Co-Chair
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 812 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

I thought , wrongly perhaps, that any memberships as prizes were for future
cons.
Someone just wins BIC and is all excited, so give them a membership to the
next years con and hook em early.

So whether the next con is donating it, or you are buying the prize
yourself, I think making it sound like

“Hey you’re new, you just did great, you should come next year for free”

is a good idea

Ricky

At 02:29 PM 8/10/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>A question has come up about our program of awarding the Best in Class:
>Novice winner a free membership to Costume-Con. The question is: what if
>they have already purchased a membership to CC23?
>
>Should we refund the purchased membership? This would seem to be the best
>solution from the point of view of the costumer, plus it fulfills the
>original purpose of the award–create a lot of excitement and enthusiasm in
>the next generation to come to CC.
>
>However, refunds are always painful as they take away from our limited
>resources. In other contests, like winning a car, it doesn’t matter if you
>just bought a new one, you only choice is to sell or give away the car. So
>that is an option for us.
>
>I wouldn’t worry about this, but if we continue with this program (as Andy
>and Kevin say they will) then we don’t want to set a wrong precedent here.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Dave Doering
>Co-Chair
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 813 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

On Aug 10, 2004, at 2:35 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I thought , wrongly perhaps, that any memberships as prizes were for
> future
> cons.
> Someone just wins BIC and is all excited, so give them a membership to
> the
> next years con and hook em early.

That’s what it has been. If tradition follows, Des Moines will be
offering CC24 memberships to the “Best Novice” winners at CC23.

> So whether the next con is donating it, or you are buying the prize
> yourself, I think making it sound like
>
> “Hey you’re new, you just did great, you should come next year for
> free”

I wonder how many “Best Novice” entrants won that at their first CC.
I’d guess quite a few. Repeat members who compete often don’t spend too
much time in the Novice division, and CC attracts locals who have
competed a lot in regional competitions.

If the CC22’s “Best Novice” winners already had CC23 memberships, my
first (preferred) suggestion is that they may transfer or sell their
extra membership to a friend. Doesn’t subtract anything from your
balances.

You could also “offer” a refund, and give them a check if they take you
up on it, or keep the money if they choose to donate their refund back.
Some folks will do this.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 814 From: Byron Connell Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates

I agree completely.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: martingear<mailto:MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Program Participant Rates

Given the small size of the con and the tightness of the budget, I don’t
remember any CostumeCons comping the program participants. It is
possible that if you were able to get a big name costume designer or
make up artist to come in just to do a couple of panels you would
probably comp them, but for the most part I don’t think that program
participants are or should be comped. All of the Costume Cons that I
have been involved with running have charged everyone including the
committee a membership fee although some of them have charged the
committee the lowest membership rate. In the event that the con makes a
profit, then it is up to the con com as to whether the committee gets
their memberships refunded or whether all the profit gets passed on to
future cons. If you are putting on the con as a part of a 501(c)3
organization there are certain restrictions as to what you can do with
any profits and how you can compensate officers who are also members of
the organization, so the safest thing is to charge everyone (with the
exception of the afore mentioned professionals) a membership and see if
there is any money to disburse at the end.

Marty

davedoering wrote:

>We have a question on comping program participants. What has been the
>past practice for programming and concom rates for memberships to CC?
>
>I think we need some good rules of thumb so as not to be unfair or
>unreasonable either in support of good people on our programming.
>
>Dave Doering
>Co-Chair
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 815 From: Byron Connell Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

I don’t understand. The next con uptime frequently has offered a free membership to the best novice in one of the masquerades at this year’s con. That means that CC 24 might offer a free membership to that con to the best novice in the CC 23 F&SF masquerade, not that CC 23 would give that person a refund. Or did CC 23 offer a free membership to the best novice at CC 22 and found that the person already had a CC 23 membership?

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: David Doering<mailto:dave@techvoice.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: [runacc] Novice Award Memberships

A question has come up about our program of awarding the Best in Class:
Novice winner a free membership to Costume-Con. The question is: what if
they have already purchased a membership to CC23?

Should we refund the purchased membership? This would seem to be the best
solution from the point of view of the costumer, plus it fulfills the
original purpose of the award–create a lot of excitement and enthusiasm in
the next generation to come to CC.

However, refunds are always painful as they take away from our limited
resources. In other contests, like winning a car, it doesn’t matter if you
just bought a new one, you only choice is to sell or give away the car. So
that is an option for us.

I wouldn’t worry about this, but if we continue with this program (as Andy
and Kevin say they will) then we don’t want to set a wrong precedent here.

Thoughts?

Dave Doering
Co-Chair
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org<http://www.cc23.org/>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 816 From: David Doering Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

>Byron wrote: “Or did CC 23 offer a free membership to the best novice at
>CC 22 and found that the person already had a CC 23 membership?”

In effect, yes. The person is actually from another con. Currently, CC23 is
doing an outreach program to various cons other than CCs with an offer for
judged shows with a BIS: Novice to get a membership for that novice.

However, it turns out that apparently one novice has already purchased a
CC23 membership.

Dave D.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 817 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 8/10/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

In a message dated 8/10/2004 6:14:23 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> If tradition follows, Des Moines will be
> offering CC24 memberships to the “Best Novice” winners at CC23.

Oh, hell then! I’m competing cuz I is a novice!
Oh wait! I’m staff for CC24! Damn!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 818 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates

Everyone, including all staff and committee members had to pay for their
memberships to CC22. The sole exceptions were the two ladies from
Simplicity. Since the company offered them to us and paid all their
expenses, plus purchased an ad in the program book, we were quite willing to
comp them in. They were the closest thing to Big Name Guests we were going
to get since I did not win the lottery and could not offer Ngila an
honorarium to come as guest costumer.

Once we finish paying for everything (still have to finish printing
certificates and mailing them out), we will examine what’s left. We would
like to pass along monies to CC23, but are also hoping to refund program
participants back to the staff rate ($50). In other words, if you paid $65
for your membership, and you were a program participant, you would receive a
refund of $15. This is the plan, but, depending on funds, may not be the
reality. We are not a 501c3, although we are a non-profit corporation, so
I’m not sure yet what the rules are on disbursement of money. Carrie is in
charge of that.

Trudy

>From: martingear <MartinGear@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Program Participant Rates
>Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:50:34 -0400
>
>Given the small size of the con and the tightness of the budget, I don’t
>remember any CostumeCons comping the program participants. It is
>possible that if you were able to get a big name costume designer or
>make up artist to come in just to do a couple of panels you would
>probably comp them, but for the most part I don’t think that program
>participants are or should be comped. All of the Costume Cons that I
>have been involved with running have charged everyone including the
>committee a membership fee although some of them have charged the
>committee the lowest membership rate. In the event that the con makes a
>profit, then it is up to the con com as to whether the committee gets
>their memberships refunded or whether all the profit gets passed on to
>future cons. If you are putting on the con as a part of a 501(c)3
>organization there are certain restrictions as to what you can do with
>any profits and how you can compensate officers who are also members of
>the organization, so the safest thing is to charge everyone (with the
>exception of the afore mentioned professionals) a membership and see if
>there is any money to disburse at the end.
>
>Marty
>
>davedoering wrote:
>
> >We have a question on comping program participants. What has been the
> >past practice for programming and concom rates for memberships to CC?
> >
> >I think we need some good rules of thumb so as not to be unfair or
> >unreasonable either in support of good people on our programming.
> >
> >Dave Doering
> >Co-Chair
> >CC23: Utah
> >www.cc23.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 819 From: srabba Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

Perhaps I’m wrong on this but; my take on the Novice Membership
awards is that they are used to increase awareness and maybe even
attendance to CostumeCon. As such they would be given to folks that
might not otherwise attend a CostumeCon. In other words present such
a prize at other conventions and venues such as WorldCon and regional
conventions near where the CC would be held. In Des Moines’ case
examples would be Archon, Convergence, etc. Might even consider
State Fair winners, design majors, and such too.

Awarding memberships to Novice winners at a CC is sort of like
preaching to the choir. It is a nice thing to do, but those folks
already know what it is about. Also winners from other venues would
be less likely to already have CC memberships.

Just a thought,
Sallie
Co-Chair CC-24

In runacc@yahoogroups.com, Andrew T Trembley <attrembl@b…> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 2004, at 2:35 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > I thought , wrongly perhaps, that any memberships as prizes were

for

> > future
> > cons.
> > Someone just wins BIC and is all excited, so give them a

membership to

> > the
> > next years con and hook em early.
>
> That’s what it has been. If tradition follows, Des Moines will be
> offering CC24 memberships to the “Best Novice” winners at CC23.
>
> > So whether the next con is donating it, or you are buying the

prize

> > yourself, I think making it sound like
> >
> > “Hey you’re new, you just did great, you should come next year

for

> > free”
>
> I wonder how many “Best Novice” entrants won that at their first

CC.

> I’d guess quite a few. Repeat members who compete often don’t spend

too

> much time in the Novice division, and CC attracts locals who have
> competed a lot in regional competitions.
>
> If the CC22’s “Best Novice” winners already had CC23 memberships,

my

> first (preferred) suggestion is that they may transfer or sell

their

> extra membership to a friend. Doesn’t subtract anything from your
> balances.
>
> You could also “offer” a refund, and give them a check if they take

you

> up on it, or keep the money if they choose to donate their refund

back.

> Some folks will do this.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
> 2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my

right

> hand
> Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 820 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

In a message dated 8/11/2004 12:48:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
gsabba@worldnet.att.net writes:

> Might even consider
> State Fair winners, design majors, and such too.

Sallie,
That is a fantastic idea!
I used the membership prize to a promising novice idea as a
promotional tool. Being able to get up in front of a friendly audience and make a quick
plug about your is worth the cost of a membership.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 821 From: David Doering Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

>Henry wrote: “Being able to … make a quick
>plug about your is worth the cost of a membership.”

That was my thinking. For example, at Norwescon, we had most of the
1000-plus membership sit and listen to a short ad for Costume-Con. Maybe
not everyone would come, but now they know there _is_ such a thing as CC
and that it thinks going to it is important enough to offer a membership as
a prize!

I don’t imagine more than a handful of the membership would have noticed a
flyer alone at the flyer table.

Dave Doering

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 822 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/11/2004
Subject: Re: Novice Award Memberships

When we did this for CCXV, I ran into only one situation that wasn’t
according to the “plan” – and it happens that the recipient is
babysitting my kids these days. I asked her today what I decided back
then. The situation was: She was part of a two-person presentation, and
they both won Best in Class. We agreed early only to award one
membership. As it happened, Amber already had a membership, so the
decision was to give the second membership to her friend.

Not exactly the situation you described, but that’s how we handled the
problem. The alternative (ickier) would have been to give both of them
half-price memberships. A bookkeeping nightmare, if it happens more than
once. You have to set your policy early to be sure that everyone is
clear on the concept.

Cheers,

Betsy

David Doering wrote:

>>Henry wrote: “Being able to … make a quick
>>plug about your is worth the cost of a membership.”
>
>
> That was my thinking. For example, at Norwescon, we had most of the
> 1000-plus membership sit and listen to a short ad for Costume-Con. Maybe
> not everyone would come, but now they know there _is_ such a thing as CC
> and that it thinks going to it is important enough to offer a membership as
> a prize!
>
> I don’t imagine more than a handful of the membership would have noticed a
> flyer alone at the flyer table.
>
> Dave Doering
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 823 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 8/12/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates

At 03:50 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:

We agree with Marty on this.

Pierre and Sandy

>Given the small size of the con and the tightness of the budget, I don’t
>remember any CostumeCons comping the program participants. It is
>possible that if you were able to get a big name costume designer or
>make up artist to come in just to do a couple of panels you would
>probably comp them, but for the most part I don’t think that program
>participants are or should be comped. All of the Costume Cons that I
>have been involved with running have charged everyone including the
>committee a membership fee although some of them have charged the
>committee the lowest membership rate. In the event that the con makes a
>profit, then it is up to the con com as to whether the committee gets
>their memberships refunded or whether all the profit gets passed on to
>future cons. If you are putting on the con as a part of a 501(c)3
>organization there are certain restrictions as to what you can do with
>any profits and how you can compensate officers who are also members of
>the organization, so the safest thing is to charge everyone (with the
>exception of the afore mentioned professionals) a membership and see if
>there is any money to disburse at the end.
>
>Marty
>
>davedoering wrote:
>
> >We have a question on comping program participants. What has been the
> >past practice for programming and concom rates for memberships to CC?
> >
> >I think we need some good rules of thumb so as not to be unfair or
> >unreasonable either in support of good people on our programming.
> >
> >Dave Doering
> >Co-Chair
> >CC23: Utah
> >www.cc23.org

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 824 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 8/12/2004
Subject: Re: Program Participant Rates

We agree also.

–Karen

At 04:33 PM 8/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>We agree with Marty on this.
>
>Pierre and Sandy
>
> >Given the small size of the con and the tightness of the budget, I don’t
> >remember any CostumeCons comping the program participants. It is
> >possible that if you were able to get a big name costume designer or
> >make up artist to come in just to do a couple of panels you would
> >probably comp them, but for the most part I don’t think that program
> >participants are or should be comped. All of the Costume Cons that I
> >have been involved with running have charged everyone including the
> >committee a membership fee although some of them have charged the
> >committee the lowest membership rate. In the event that the con makes a
> >profit, then it is up to the con com as to whether the committee gets
> >their memberships refunded or whether all the profit gets passed on to
> >future cons. If you are putting on the con as a part of a 501(c)3
> >organization there are certain restrictions as to what you can do with
> >any profits and how you can compensate officers who are also members of
> >the organization, so the safest thing is to charge everyone (with the
> >exception of the afore mentioned professionals) a membership and see if
> >there is any money to disburse at the end.
> >
> >Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 825 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 8/18/2004
Subject: CC26? at WorldCon, 9/2/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at WorldCon


Thursday September 2, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.

Notes:
Host Costumer’s suite TBD, award ribbons, fliers



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 826 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/19/2004
Subject: [Fwd: [ICG-D] Fliers & stuph]
Thought this would be of interest…

Cheers,

Betsy

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: [ICG-D] Fliers & stuph
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:07:43 -0400
From: Elaine Mami <ecmami@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com

Hi, All,

Once again, about the N4 Costume Display.

I still need information on the costumes you are bringing to sdhow. (You
know who you are!) I want to prepare the signage before the con.

Also, I INSIST that all upcoming CCs and CC bids get fliers to me to put at
the display. I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE all chapters to get me your general
info.
fliers, because it is very likely that someone from your area will drop in
to see the display. This is a WORLDcon folks, so let’s tell the world
about
us!! (Can you say “outreach” boys and girls? I knew you could!)

Elaine
Who just may get her costume done in time!

Nil significat nili osculat!

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

Yahoo! Groups Links



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 827 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 9/3/2004
Subject: CC26? at Chicago Coronation, 9/18/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at Chicago Coronation


Saturday September 18, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.

Notes:
Fliers, award ribbons



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 828 From: davedoering Date: 9/8/2004
Subject: CC23 RATE DEADLINE
Dear Fellow RunACCs:

September 12th is the cutoff for the $75.00 membership rate for
Costume-Con 23: Utah!

Please let everyone know–the website is open 24HRS/7 Days a week for
online signups.

Yours,

Dave Doering
Co-Chair
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org
REMEMBER: September 12th is the cutoff for the current membership
rate!!

 

Group: runacc Message: 829 From: davedoering Date: 9/9/2004
Subject: Overuse of Staff
On various occassions I have been presented names for people to work
with on Costume-Con 23. However, I also know that I have seen these
people do the same job over and over.

Is there a guideline on this? Should this be left to the individual?

Sometimes the person involved should say no, but doesn’t. Then feels
put-upon in private. How do we help avoid this?

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org
REMEMBER: September 12th is the cutoff for the current membership
rate!!

 

Group: runacc Message: 830 From: martingear Date: 9/9/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff

Well, I would say that it depends upon how well you like the job that
the person does. I did hotel liaison for ten years (after all, I
negotiate contracts with the Federal Government for a living) until I
burned out after BucCONeer, but if we get the bid for CC-27 I’ll be
doing that again. Byron invented many of the things that have become
standard for a well run Green Room, and if he offers you couldn’t get a
better person IMHO, but now that he has discovered being on stage who
knows if he’ll volunteer. There is something to be said for experience.
Most of us learn from our mistakes and if we’ve been doing a job long
enough there just aren’t that many new mistakes for us to make. If the
person is experienced and volunteers, and if you like what you’ve seen
them do, then by all means accept. We are most of us grown ups and we
should know better than to volunteer if we really don’t want to do a
particular job. I would think that your big problem would be if someone
volunteered to do something and your personal opinion is that they
really stink at it, then how do you turn them down without hurting their
feelings.

YMMV –

^M^

davedoering wrote:

>On various occassions I have been presented names for people to work
>with on Costume-Con 23. However, I also know that I have seen these
>people do the same job over and over.
>
>Is there a guideline on this? Should this be left to the individual?
>
>Sometimes the person involved should say no, but doesn’t. Then feels
>put-upon in private. How do we help avoid this?
>
>Dave Doering
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org
>REMEMBER: September 12th is the cutoff for the current membership
>rate!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 831 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/10/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff

At 10:32 PM 9/9/2004 +0000, you wrote:

>I also know that I have seen these people do the same job over and over.

Not a problem if they’re doing a good job, and like doing that job.

Big problem if they hate doing that job, or do it poorly.

Semi problem if somebody else also wants the job, and would also do it well.

Big problem if too few committee people are taking on too many jobs.

Chairing a concom is such fun, isn’t it?

>Is there a guideline on this?

No. Some CC concoms like to stick with familiar people in familiar
positions. Others feel more adventurous, and like to mix things up.

>Should this be left to the individual?

The individual doing the job, or …?

If nobody is going to do the job, you may have to settle for a
less-than-perfect choice if somebody volunteers, or if you have to
press-gang somebody into doing it.

People may volunteer for jobs, but it is your prerogative as con chair to
give them the go-ahead (or not). However, it is also your job as con chair
to delegate as much authority as possible (or you will be wearing too many
hats and doing too many jobs yourself and running yourself ragged).

Things may not get done the way you would have them done in an ideal world.
But they will get done. They may even get done better than you expected if
you delegate the authority and give the person freedom to do it their way.

>Sometimes the person involved should say no, but doesn’t. Then feels
>put-upon in private. How do we help avoid this?

It is very hard for some people to say no, even when they should. They
don’t want to displease the person who is asking.

Tell them that it’s OK to say “no.” And that you will not think less of
them as a person, or withdraw your friendship if they say “no.” (And mean
it.) And if they obviously seem to be struggling in the job, ask if there’s
anything you can do to help.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 832 From: Elaine Mami Date: 9/10/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff

Dave,

This may seem simplistic, but you might try something like offerring an
either-or to them. “I would love to have you work on my committee. Would
you like to do ‘X’, or would you prefer to do another job? These are the
openings I have.”

Elaine

>From: “davedoering” <dave@techvoice.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Overuse of Staff
>Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:32:55 -0000
>
>On various occassions I have been presented names for people to work
>with on Costume-Con 23. However, I also know that I have seen these
>people do the same job over and over.
>
>Is there a guideline on this? Should this be left to the individual?
>
>Sometimes the person involved should say no, but doesn’t. Then feels
>put-upon in private. How do we help avoid this?
>
>Dave Doering
>CC23: Utah
>www.cc23.org
>REMEMBER: September 12th is the cutoff for the current membership
>rate!!
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

 

Group: runacc Message: 833 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/12/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff

Dave —

There is a great North American floating masquerade crew; the names you have been getting are part of it. It is very likely that the people for whom you have received recommendations are the VERY best at these jobs. You ought to take them if you want a successful con. If they don’t want the job, they’ll say “no”; please, don’t worry about that!

You were advised to ask me to run the green rooms. Instead, you asked me for names of possible green room managers. I gave you several names and told you that I would run the green rooms if none of them were available. I have heard via the grapevine that they turned you down. Is that correct? If so, I have not heard from you. If you want someone else, I’ll try to come up with some additional names if you can send me the list of attending members.

Within the confines of the runacc group ONLY, we want to see CC 23 succeed; frankly, however, several of us are very worried about the committee’s lack of progress in filling out the convention staff.

Please forgive my tone; I’m worried.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: davedoering<mailto:dave@techvoice.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:32 PM
Subject: [runacc] Overuse of Staff

On various occassions I have been presented names for people to work
with on Costume-Con 23. However, I also know that I have seen these
people do the same job over and over.

Is there a guideline on this? Should this be left to the individual?

Sometimes the person involved should say no, but doesn’t. Then feels
put-upon in private. How do we help avoid this?

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org<http://www.cc23.org/>
REMEMBER: September 12th is the cutoff for the current membership
rate!!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 834 From: davedoering Date: 9/13/2004
Subject: Re: Overuse of Staff
Byron wrote: ” Please forgive my tone”

I am never concerned when important issues are brought up, as I
think these are. And certainly not from someone of your background
and abilities, Byron. I do realize we all want Costume-Con to
succeed, this year, next year, and so on. I’ll accept any amount of
criticism now to improve our con over getting it on May 3rd, 2005.

To answer the most serious of your questions first:

“I have heard via the grapevine that [potential Green Room Managers]
turned you down. Is that correct?”

No, this is not correct. I do not know who might have said this, but
I have had no one turn me down. I have asked several about their
interest, but they have not said “No” to me directly. (I had assumed
that because of WorldCon there would be some lag between my asking
and their ability to respond.)

If you have heard differently, I am curious to know from whom and
when. This does concern me, as it suggests someone may not be
willing to talk to me or our staff about working with Costume-Con
23. If there is something that hurts a committee, it is bad
communication.

You also said “You were advised to ask me to run the green rooms.
Instead, you asked me for names of possible green room managers.”

I apologize if I have left you confused. It was certainly NOT
because I didn’t or don’t appreciate your abilities. Far from it.

As you’ll recall, you and I spoke in Atlanta about your serving as
the Green Room Manager for CC23. I said that I already understood
you were one of, if not the, premier Green Room person, and we would
like to have you, but that I didn’t want to force you to do
a “repeat performance” right after Atlanta. That, if I could, I
would like to have some other names to possibly serve for that
position. You were kind enough to say “I will serve in any way you
need me to” which I appreciated.

It was not, then, that I didn’t appreciate your ability from early
on, it was my continuing desire to offer you other choices if you
wanted to. If I was wrong in that, I apologize.

I have always and would always welcome your services as Green Room
Director or in any other capacity for our convention.

Also, I might add, my reason for posting the question
about “overuse” of staff was not an uncomfortable effort to ask you
to serve without asking you. Instead, I knew we had other positions
to fill in the immediate future (ie: post-WorldCon), I wanted to
make such decisions fast and effectively. It helps to know from
people with lots of past experience in fannish endeavors what
works/doesn’t work so we wouldn’t take any more time in making that
happen.

You said: “…several of us are very worried about the committee’s
lack of progress in filling out the convention staff.”

If you wanted to instill in me and our con-com an even stronger
sense of urgency, you have done so.

Which particular positions you are thinking of?

You said: “You ought to take [staff suggestions] if you want a
successful con.”

I _am_ happy to say that Charles and I have always taken staff
suggestions with the utmost seriousness. We have never rejected
anyone because we are too parochial “we-want-to-do-it-ourselves” or
because we were unwilling to ask.

As I said, I welcome suggestions, error correction, or even abuse if
it helps us make CC23 more successful for anyone. Don’t wait until
May to speak up.

Yours,

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah

 

Group: runacc Message: 835 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/16/2004
Subject: promotional materials…
…sent out to Lisa Ashton for the Known World Costume Symposium


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 836 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/20/2004
Subject: reminder for CC24 folks
The Imperial Court of Iowa is having its Coronation this weekend in Des
Moines.

http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/desmoines.html
http://www.imperialcourtofia.org/Coronation%20XI.htm

It would be a good idea to attend and get an idea what this event is
like. Next year you really should walk as an in-town organization to
promote the con.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 837 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/22/2004
Subject: New CC25 Website!!
Pardon the cross-posting but…

ANNOUNCING…
The brand-spanking new CC25 website!
New look, more info!
Check it out at:

www.cc25.net

Thank you.
You may now return to your regularly scheduled program.

Nora Mai

 

Group: runacc Message: 838 From: David Doering Date: 9/22/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Nora wrote: “ANNOUNCING…The brand-spanking new CC25 website!”

Yes, it is _real_ cool!

Good work.

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 839 From: axejudge Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
The CC22 link is dead. You may want to connect to the Costume-Con
page for that con.

Maybe Trudy archived the site somewhere.

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 840 From: axejudge Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!

Same for CC18.

Karen

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, “axejudge” <axejudge@a…> wrote:
> The CC22 link is dead. You may want to connect to the Costume-Con
> page for that con.
>
> Maybe Trudy archived the site somewhere.
>
> Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 841 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 9/23/2004
Subject: Re: New CC25 Website!!
Nora,
I sent the site to a whole bunch of the folks up here to spread the
word!
Henry
your site selection guy until you come up with something else for me
to
do for your con

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 842 From: srabba Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Staff memberships
Greetings all,

Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
there any restrictions/conditions attached?

Sallie Abba
CC-24

 

Group: runacc Message: 843 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

On Oct 6, 2004, at 9:32 AM, srabba wrote:

> Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
> memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
> there any restrictions/conditions attached?

Staff membership availability is usually determined by what your con
budget allows…

I prefer to at least stick to the “everybody pays” rule, and if the con
has enough surplus at the end it may refund staff and volunteers what
they paid.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 844 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

Hi, Sallie!

CCXV offered a fixed rate of $45 for its staff members, with the
understanding that if we made a profit, we would offer refunds. As it
happened, we provided refunds to approximately three-quarters of the
staff, with the remainder offering their money up as a donation to the
next CC.

Exact figures are in the online Budget on the Costume-ConNections site.

Don’t know what the succeeding CCs did…

Betsy

srabba wrote:

>
> Greetings all,
>
> Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
> memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
> there any restrictions/conditions attached?
>
> Sallie Abba
> CC-24



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 845 From: David Doering Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
Our procedure at CC23 is what Andy says–“Everybody pays”–which we felt
was fair. Otherwise it is just too difficult to try and evaluate levels of
contribution to make any “complimentary” staff memberships work.

To arrive at our starting rate, we looked at our budget, number of members
expected, and then worked backwards to set levels for At-the-door,
three-months-out, six-months-out, etc.

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org

 

Group: runacc Message: 846 From: martingear Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

I seem to remember that CC-3 and CC-9 did basically what Betsy said
about CC-15. As far as I recall, the staff membership was set at the
supporting membership rate which was set at a level to cover all
publications cost including mailing of the Whole Costumers’ Catalog, the
FFF, all PR’s and the program book. I don’t believe that CC-3 was able
to refund the staff memberships in full, but I do believe that each
staff member was given a partial reimbursement.

Marty

srabba wrote:

>Greetings all,
>
>Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
>memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
>there any restrictions/conditions attached?
>
>Sallie Abba
>CC-24
>
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 847 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

In my experience, there is no tradition of a special staff rate; staff members pay the full rate. Most CCs need all the income they can get.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: srabba<mailto:gsabba@worldnet.att.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:32 PM
Subject: [runacc] Staff memberships

Greetings all,

Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
there any restrictions/conditions attached?

Sallie Abba
CC-24

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 848 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

I have no recollection at all about what Tina and I paid at CC 9. She and I were in charge of logistics. I also ran the masquerade green rooms and she provided the repair table.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: martingear<mailto:MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Staff memberships

I seem to remember that CC-3 and CC-9 did basically what Betsy said
about CC-15. As far as I recall, the staff membership was set at the
supporting membership rate which was set at a level to cover all
publications cost including mailing of the Whole Costumers’ Catalog, the
FFF, all PR’s and the program book. I don’t believe that CC-3 was able
to refund the staff memberships in full, but I do believe that each
staff member was given a partial reimbursement.

Marty

srabba wrote:

>Greetings all,
>
>Here’s a topic for discussion. Is there a tradition of staff
>memberships at Costume-Con? If so what is the usual rate and are
>there any restrictions/conditions attached?
>
>Sallie Abba
>CC-24

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 849 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships

I can’t recall what I paid for CC9 (I was Exhibits Coordinator, but I
also had a dealer table, which made a difference), but I do know the $45
figure was our starting point for memberships, and we simply froze it at
that rate for our staff, regardless of when they paid. Supporting
memberships for CCXV were at $25.

I don’t think I got a refund for CC9, but I could be wrong.

Setting the rate at the start of the budget process is the best thing to
do, since it gives you the best idea for how much you’ll have to spend
at the end. I found that the best way to manage the money was to be
flexible. And in one case in particular, the Whole Costumers’ Catalog,
we were still generating income from the sales of that publication well
over a year after the conclusion of the conference. I passed all income
from the sale of the books (if I recall), once all our bills were paid
and refunds were processed, either back to Karen or on to the next CC. I
don’t recall correctly which (we ran out well over 5 years ago!).

YMMV

Betsy

martingear wrote:

> I seem to remember that CC-3 and CC-9 did basically what Betsy said
> about CC-15. As far as I recall, the staff membership was set at the
> supporting membership rate which was set at a level to cover all
> publications cost including mailing of the Whole Costumers’ Catalog, the
> FFF, all PR’s and the program book. I don’t believe that CC-3 was able
> to refund the staff memberships in full, but I do believe that each
> staff member was given a partial reimbursement.
>
> Marty



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 850 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 10/6/2004
Subject: Re: Staff memberships
We’re still researching this one. The general policy at CC16 was as Andy
described. We will probably have a flat rate that staffers can join in the
next couple of years — up to some future point in time. After that, they
will be responsible for more if they wait too long.

Bruce

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 16 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 16 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 751 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 752 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 753 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 754 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: [Fwd: [ICG-D] handy hints]
Group: runacc Message: 755 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 756 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 757 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 758 From: Bruno Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 759 From: Bruno Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 760 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ICG-D] handy hints]
Group: runacc Message: 761 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 762 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 763 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: flyer update…
Group: runacc Message: 764 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: CC26? at San Diego Comic-Con International
Group: runacc Message: 765 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Must-see-TV
Group: runacc Message: 766 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 767 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 768 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 769 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names
Group: runacc Message: 770 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
Group: runacc Message: 771 From: martingear Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
Group: runacc Message: 772 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
Group: runacc Message: 773 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 774 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 775 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: – hotels
Group: runacc Message: 776 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
Group: runacc Message: 777 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 778 From: Bruno Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 779 From: martingear Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 780 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
Group: runacc Message: 781 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 782 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 783 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 784 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 785 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 786 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 787 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/19/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 788 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/19/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 789 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 790 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 791 From: martingear Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 792 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 793 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 794 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: time (was Re: [runacc] livejournal?
Group: runacc Message: 795 From: Bruno Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Write-up about Marty
Group: runacc Message: 796 From: martingear Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty
Group: runacc Message: 797 From: Bruno Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty
Group: runacc Message: 798 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 799 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Group: runacc Message: 800 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 751 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

In a message dated 7/13/2004 6:59:04 PM Central Daylight Time,
bruno@soulmasque.com writes:

> I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s never
> been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than to
> just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
> masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would be
> nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things at CC;
> masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels. I
> think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would be the
> best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.

This method works well with hotels that ask “So what happens at your
function?”
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 752 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

On Jul 12, 2004, at 7:55 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Andy’s comments about possible age discrimination are a bit
> disconcerting,
> though…. What about the people who run the cons? They can’t be
> pups.

Maybe I’m just spacy, but I don’t remember saying anything about age
discrimination in western anime fandom. In western anime fandom,
“otaku” is a desirable classification.

Japanese culture looks down on any sort of “fannish” behavior in
adults, so adult fans and particularly adult con-runners who aren’t in
the publishing or entertainment industry (and thus have suitable
business interests) have to be pretty quiet about it. It’s not
something you even mention to your mundane coworkers or neighbors.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 753 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Oh, argh, you’re right. Orguss came out at about the same period and had
something of the same art direction as Mospeda (looked like they would fit
in the same universe).

–Karen

At 05:04 PM 7/12/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>On Jul 10, 2004, at 11:31 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > From the 80’s
> > Robotech (combining the three shows Macross, Southern Cross, and
> > Orguss–I
> > never saw the Orguss phase)
>
>Super Dimesion Fortress Macross, Super Dimension Cavalry Southern Cross
>and Genesis Climber Mospaeda, actually. Badly edited and rewritten to
>create Robotech.
>
>Got the restored edition of SDF Macross a year or two ago, and it was
>really cool. Makes a lot more sense. Just got Mospaeda on disc, haven’t
>started watching it yet.
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
>…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 754 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: [Fwd: [ICG-D] handy hints]
Some interesting food for thought…

Cheers,

Betsy

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: [ICG-D] handy hints
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:57:34 -0000
From: Susan Eisenhour <cfsje@ux1.cts.eiu.edu>
Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com

I was trying to figure the best way to save some of the helpful
things people have passed on in this list, and had a great idea.
Some CC committee ought to have one of the members troll through the
past messages and pull out useful, tricky, interesting, etc. things
mentioned here and compile a hand out as part of a registration
packet…or maybe as a fund-raiser before the con? Or maybe both?
Sort of a Hints from Heloise for the costumer.
I’d find it really useful, esp if it was indexed. So the next time I
need to paint plastic and vaguely remember a mention, I could go
look up “paint, plastic” and find the reference to Fusion.
Of course, these ought to be credited with the first person who
mentioned them. Maybe the date, too.
This is what happens when (retired) library techs do costumes.
Susan Eisenhour

Yahoo! Groups Links



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 755 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List
I am in the process of compiling an updated mailing list of potential
designers to target with a mass mailing for the CC-23 Future Fashion Design
Contest. I’m thinking of doing a mass mailing in early August, which will
give designers 60 days before deadline to send us designs.

The base list of about 100 names came from Fran Evans in California, and is
several years old (but still newer than my last list, which dates back to
CC-9). I’ve been able to update / confirm about half the addresses on it so
far, and have added the designer lists from CC-21 and CC-22. I’m now up to
148 names, 93 of them updated / confirmed.

If anyone has designer address data from other CC’s, please contact me, as
I am also in the process of trying to contact designers from all CC’s re
getting rights to use their design artwork on Costume-Con.org next to the
finished designs from the Fashion Show. Many of the designers from the
early Costume-Cons have moved / married / etc. and are proving difficult to
locate.

We should think about having an online place to “park” this designer list
from year to year so we don’t keep having to reinvent the wheel for each
Costume-Con. Could be in a non-public area of Costume-Con.org, could be on
the server associated with this group, ???

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 756 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

On Jul 14, 2004, at 12:18 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> We should think about having an online place to “park” this designer
> list
> from year to year so we don’t keep having to reinvent the wheel for
> each
> Costume-Con. Could be in a non-public area of Costume-Con.org, could
> be on
> the server associated with this group, ???

There is a ‘database’ area in our yahoogroup; perhaps seting up a FFF
contact list there is a good solution.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/database


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 757 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

Sounds like a valuable resource, but it would have to be accessible to a small group only, I think – FFF editors or whatever. There are some people who don’t like their info given out (for good reasons), such as Alison Kondo. It would be a shame to have some good FFF designers pull out because they were concerned about this. Runacc is a pretty limited group and might be acceptable to them.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick<mailto:castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] FFF Mailing List

<snip>
We should think about having an online place to “park” this designer list
from year to year so we don’t keep having to reinvent the wheel for each
Costume-Con. Could be in a non-public area of Costume-Con.org, could be on
the server associated with this group, ???

–Karen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 758 From: Bruno Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

I haven’t used the DB feature in Yahoo!Groups much, but I’d rather see the
list in Excel or some other popular DB program which could easily be
manipulated and used to generate mailing labels and form letters.

Michael

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] FFF Mailing List

> On Jul 14, 2004, at 12:18 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > We should think about having an online place to “park” this designer
> > list
> > from year to year so we don’t keep having to reinvent the wheel for
> > each
> > Costume-Con. Could be in a non-public area of Costume-Con.org, could
> > be on
> > the server associated with this group, ???
>
> There is a ‘database’ area in our yahoogroup; perhaps seting up a FFF
> contact list there is a good solution.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/database

 

Group: runacc Message: 759 From: Bruno Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Masquerade names
I don’t remember if it was here or on the D-list, but there was a discussion about changing the title of the SF/F Masquerade to appear more appealing to Cosplayers.

I have seen the following titles used at Anime conventions: Cosplay Contest, Cosplay Costume Contest, Costume Contest, Cosplay Skit Contest, Masquerade, and probably others.

I do not think that the title SF/F Masquerade would preclude them from entering. However, what about using Historical Masquerade and Grand Masquerade, as anything not historical?

Michael

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 760 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ICG-D] handy hints]

That’s a good idea. It would go along with the newbie handouts that we’ve used from time to time.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney<mailto:bdelaney@hawkeswood.com>
To: Run a Costume-Con Mailing List<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:15 PM
Subject: [runacc] [Fwd: [ICG-D] handy hints]

Some interesting food for thought…

Cheers,

Betsy

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: [ICG-D] handy hints
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:57:34 -0000
From: Susan Eisenhour <cfsje@ux1.cts.eiu.edu<mailto:cfsje@ux1.cts.eiu.edu>>
Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com<mailto:ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com<mailto:ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>

I was trying to figure the best way to save some of the helpful
things people have passed on in this list, and had a great idea.
Some CC committee ought to have one of the members troll through the
past messages and pull out useful, tricky, interesting, etc. things
mentioned here and compile a hand out as part of a registration
packet…or maybe as a fund-raiser before the con? Or maybe both?
Sort of a Hints from Heloise for the costumer.
I’d find it really useful, esp if it was indexed. So the next time I
need to paint plastic and vaguely remember a mention, I could go
look up “paint, plastic” and find the reference to Fusion.
Of course, these ought to be credited with the first person who
mentioned them. Maybe the date, too.
This is what happens when (retired) library techs do costumes.
Susan Eisenhour

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 761 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:54 PM, Bruno wrote:

> I haven’t used the DB feature in Yahoo!Groups much, but I’d rather see
> the
> list in Excel or some other popular DB program which could easily be
> manipulated and used to generate mailing labels and form letters.

Yahoogroups DBs export rather nicely, and the output can be sucked into
whatever software you choose for printing labels and form letters.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 762 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names

On Jul 14, 2004, at 5:04 PM, Bruno wrote:

> I do not think that the title SF/F Masquerade would preclude them from
> entering. However, what about using Historical Masquerade and Grand
> Masquerade, as anything not historical?

On the ICG-D list, and I made a few points there…

We go with a genre-based breakdown, and I think that makes sense. There
are vastly different judging standards in historical competition and in
F&SF competition (even with regards to F&SF recreations).

Anime, manga and video games aren’t genres, they’re media. Recreations
based on the vast majority of anime and manga could fit into either the
F&SF or the Historical masquerade. Even most anime and manga with
modern settings have fantastic elements of some sort.

The only real glaring exception is sports dramas, and I have to say I
haven’t seen much evidence of people competing costumes from those.
People do cosplay those characters in the hall, but in cosplay circles
they’re even arguing about the validity of competing something that is
basically off-the-rack modern clothes.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 763 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: flyer update…
So based on a bunch of comments, I’ve added a “cosplay” flyer to the
stack
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/CC26.Fliers.pdf
Page 2 (yeah, the big 3.6mb flyer pack)

Note it’s not much different from the “anime” flyer but my sources say
this may be more attractive to the anime con crowd.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 764 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: CC26? at San Diego Comic-Con International
We’ve got a new bid committee member who will be at CCI handing out our
hall costume ribbons and talking up CC in general to folks at the con.
I’m going to make sure that Dany has a stack of the “mark your
calendar” fliers along with targeted fliers for the audience.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 765 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Must-see-TV
Foamy the Squirrel
http://www.flashplayer.com/animation/rulesforthemasses.html

It’s coarse, it’s rude, and eminently appropriate for most convention
situations.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 766 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/14/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names

Andy —

Once again, you’re talking way over the heads of lots of us. What the h__k is a sports drama?!

Byron (the Ignorant)

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley<mailto:attrembl@bovil.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Masquerade names

On Jul 14, 2004, at 5:04 PM, Bruno wrote:
> I do not think that the title SF/F Masquerade would preclude them from
> entering. However, what about using Historical Masquerade and Grand
> Masquerade, as anything not historical?

On the ICG-D list, and I made a few points there…

We go with a genre-based breakdown, and I think that makes sense. There
are vastly different judging standards in historical competition and in
F&SF competition (even with regards to F&SF recreations).

Anime, manga and video games aren’t genres, they’re media. Recreations
based on the vast majority of anime and manga could fit into either the
F&SF or the Historical masquerade. Even most anime and manga with
modern settings have fantastic elements of some sort.

The only real glaring exception is sports dramas, and I have to say I
haven’t seen much evidence of people competing costumes from those.
People do cosplay those characters in the hall, but in cosplay circles
they’re even arguing about the validity of competing something that is
basically off-the-rack modern clothes.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/<http://www.bovil.com/>
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 767 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names

Byron, there are anime shows and manga comics about…oh…things like
baseball.

Hence “sports drama.”

I don’t get it, but there has to be a market, or it wouldn’t be made.

–Karen

At 10:52 PM 7/14/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Andy —
>
>Once again, you’re talking way over the heads of lots of us. What the
>h__k is a sports drama?!
>
>Byron (the Ignorant)

 

Group: runacc Message: 768 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names

Byron Connell wrote:

> Andy —
>
> Once again, you’re talking way over the heads of lots of us. What the h__k is a sports drama?!

Would you believe a series about the members of a sports team?

“Slam-Dunk,” a very popular basketball manga, is a good example. Soccer,
baseball or nearly any other team sport can be a setting for manga and
anime. Doesn’t have to be a team sport, though. Tennis anyone?

Most often they’re about high school teams, or intermural leagues. The
formula is usually:
1. bunch of losers band together to form a successful team
2. outsider unwillingly joins team and becomes hero
3. losing team’s coach is dying yada yada yada
(these can, of course, also be adapted for individual sports, see tennis
ref above)

It’s about the only manga/anime genre that I know of that is almost
always played totally straight without any sort of fantastic elements.

So anyway, the point is that it’s a genre where normal off-the-rack
clothing (particularly normal sports uniforms) is the costume-du-jour.
It is a genre that doesn’t fit easily within either the F&SF or
Historical masquerade.

There are other manga and anime series that feature straight modern
settings, but most are in genres (relationship comedies, sex/romance
farces) that can feature fantastic elements.

For example, “Kimagure Orange Road,” a modern relationship comedy, is
played relatively straight, except the main character and his sisters
have psychokinetic powers they have to keep secret (this doesn’t feature
in every episode). “Maison Ikokku,” another relationship comedy about a
“ronin” (high school grad who hasn’t yet passed his college entrance
exams) is played totally straight, with no psychic or magical powers
anywhere.

Cosplayers often discuss the merits of competing such costumes; they
are, after all, in most cases readily available modern clothing. It’s
akin to the discussion of historical costumes that you may have worn
yourself in period.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 769 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Masquerade names

In a message dated 7/14/2004 10:10:51 PM Central Daylight Time,
bpconnell@verizon.net writes:

> hat the h__k is a sports drama?!

“Professional Wrestling”?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 770 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….

Took a few days to get permission to forward this

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Karisu-sama <chris@imagecraft.com>
> Date: July 8, 2004 3:51:19 AM PDT
> To: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>, kevin@twistedimage.com
> Cc: Richard Man <richard@imagecraft.com>
> Subject: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
>
> Heyo, guys! Pieces of news and sundry… Forgive me if I’m writing
> very incoherently – I am very tired and totally brain-fried….
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1) I am becoming more and more enthusiastic about working with y’all
> for the hopeful Costume Con 2008. To this end I have been dropping
> info about it all over the place in the Anime cosplay community, in
> order to draw as many of the people as I know in cosplay to Costume
> Con (and I know a LOT of people in that community.) As a ‘crossover
> costumer” myself, I really would like to see a harmony of the various
> costuming communities, not entirely separate worlds that never meet…
>
> In addition, as a Cosplay.Com staffer, I get to hang out with with the
> “big names”, and I have been heavily promoting Costume Con to the best
> of my ability among the top-level cosplayers that I know, such as Yaya
> Han, Justin, Rosiel, Tristin Citrine, Lily and Haruka, Hoshikage, and
> so forth. These are Master-class people. Several of them wish to
> branch out into original design costuming (or already do so). Their
> work is incredible. Yaya (who is a very nice person) has been asked
> “not to participate” in several Masquerades because she is “unfair
> competition”. I told her she really ought to take her work to Costume
> Con. She didn’t even know it was in Atlanta this past year – her home
> town!
>
> I personally feel that people like this ought to be brought to Costume
> Con and get in with the ICG. Justin, for example, told me that he’s
> hardly even heard about the ICG, and has no idea how to join. I think
> we ought to really try to embrace this incredibly talented and
> seriously-costuming young generation. New blood, new blood! 😀
>
> One issue that will have to be addressed with them is registration
> fees – these Anime-con-raised kids are used to paying $50 tops –
> anything more is exorbitant to them, and will take a lot of
> explanation justifying why there is a higher cost (and it would help
> if they know about the early fees before they go up!) I have explained
> that Worldcons, for example, really DO give you the”bang” for the
> incredible buck, but they are young, and not so used to cons “by fans
> for fans”….
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 2) Some of this determination of mine is further prompted by the utter
> debacle known as the Anime Expo 2004 Masquerade Workmanship “Judging”,
> at which my children ATTEMPTED to debut their first-ever self-made
> costume set. (I say ATTEMPTED, because we ended up withdrawing due to
> the extreme offensiveness of the way we were treated.) Gods, do we
> NEED better judged and better run cons at Anime Masquerades. I for one
> would like to promote a LOT more big-name cosplayer pressure on Con
> staff for ICG-style Masqs. For this, or course, we need to get more
> cosplayers in the ICG…
>
> If you have any time to read about the AX’04 Masq., the whole sordid
> mess is detailed in this Cosplay.Com thread:
> http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702
>
> If you don’t have much time, at least perhaps try page 1, and here are
> a couple of the pages where I am in the discussion, if you care to
> scroll to my posts:
> http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702&page=3&pp=15
> http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702&page=5&pp=15
>
> In any case, the entire situation was absolutely disgusting,
> especially after how incredibly well things were done last year,
>
> My KIDS, 13 and 9, who busted their butts over their workmanship (and
> the youngest spent time in the emergency room for sewing through her
> finger with the machine) have been absolutely insulted and demeaned.
> (Plucky them, they are improving on their entry and taking it to
> Worldcon instead.) I am incensed.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 3) I’ve been costuming for 31 years. How the heck can I get some
> experience judging? It would give me more clout among these people
> almost half my age, many of whom already have quite a bit of judging
> experience. I’d be happy to do an apprenticeship or something…. I
> just have never done judging before.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Anyway, thanks for putting up with my rambling. Gotta go crash now.
> See you soon somewhere, hopefully. (Worldcon?) *hugs*
>
>
> — Karisu-sama (Chris)
> ———————————-
> Moero!!
>
>


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 771 From: martingear Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….

I read the whole AnimeX Workmanship Judging brouhaha, and I was totally
appalled. This February I convinced the masquerade directors of
Katsucon to let me be the workmanship judge. I spent the first part of
the day wandering the con in rather mundane clothing (o.k. I was wearing
one of my bat belt buckles and a bat embroidered shirt) and got no
negative vibes at all. I spent the rest of the day except for a 1 hour
dinner break doing workmanship judging. (Approximately 70 costumes.) I
was still judging right through the cosplay. Everybody who wanted
workmanship judging got it, up close and personal, and I even sent a
couple of entrants out to bring me reference materials for their
costumes and then made the comparisons. While the other judges were
hassling, I got to present the workmanship awards, explaining to the
audience why I made the awards I did and invited them to take a closer
look if they had the opportunity.

I must have done something right, because I got three letters thanking
me for my judging. (2 from competitors and one from an audience member
who had not competed) I also got a complementary paragraph from Kevin
Lillard in the April Animerica, and I’m told, some complementary press
in a couple of the anime web groups. I hope to be asked back next year,
and if I am I’ll bring some more organization to the workmanship judging.

Almost any of us on this list and probably the ICGD list can judge
workmanship. You don’t have to be familiar with the character to see if
seams are straight and the hems finished, and if the contestant brings
documentation you can judge accuracy in recreation. (BTW there was one
young lady there who can give Dany a run for her money on
documentation.) I was promoting Balticon, but if I am asked back next
year I’ll push the CC’s because Kastsucon drew people from all over the
country. If we really want to make inroads in this community I’d like
to suggest that each year’s CC might consider giving a free membership
to “best novice” (or whatever the con calls the equivalent.) at several
of the larger Anime Cons. This not only gives us the chance to promote
Costume Con, but also sends a loud and clear message that we want them.

Andy, please tell Karisu-sama for me that I would love to have had the
opportunity to judge her daughters’ costumes and give them the respect
that they deserved.

Marty

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>Took a few days to get permission to forward this
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>>From: Karisu-sama <chris@imagecraft.com>
>>Date: July 8, 2004 3:51:19 AM PDT
>>To: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>, kevin@twistedimage.com
>>Cc: Richard Man <richard@imagecraft.com>
>>Subject: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
>>
>>Heyo, guys! Pieces of news and sundry… Forgive me if I’m writing
>>very incoherently – I am very tired and totally brain-fried….
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>1) I am becoming more and more enthusiastic about working with y’all
>>for the hopeful Costume Con 2008. To this end I have been dropping
>>info about it all over the place in the Anime cosplay community, in
>>order to draw as many of the people as I know in cosplay to Costume
>>Con (and I know a LOT of people in that community.) As a ‘crossover
>>costumer” myself, I really would like to see a harmony of the various
>>costuming communities, not entirely separate worlds that never meet…
>>
>>In addition, as a Cosplay.Com staffer, I get to hang out with with the
>>”big names”, and I have been heavily promoting Costume Con to the best
>>of my ability among the top-level cosplayers that I know, such as Yaya
>>Han, Justin, Rosiel, Tristin Citrine, Lily and Haruka, Hoshikage, and
>>so forth. These are Master-class people. Several of them wish to
>>branch out into original design costuming (or already do so). Their
>>work is incredible. Yaya (who is a very nice person) has been asked
>>”not to participate” in several Masquerades because she is “unfair
>>competition”. I told her she really ought to take her work to Costume
>>Con. She didn’t even know it was in Atlanta this past year – her home
>>town!
>>
>>I personally feel that people like this ought to be brought to Costume
>>Con and get in with the ICG. Justin, for example, told me that he’s
>>hardly even heard about the ICG, and has no idea how to join. I think
>>we ought to really try to embrace this incredibly talented and
>>seriously-costuming young generation. New blood, new blood! 😀
>>
>>One issue that will have to be addressed with them is registration
>>fees – these Anime-con-raised kids are used to paying $50 tops –
>>anything more is exorbitant to them, and will take a lot of
>>explanation justifying why there is a higher cost (and it would help
>>if they know about the early fees before they go up!) I have explained
>>that Worldcons, for example, really DO give you the”bang” for the
>>incredible buck, but they are young, and not so used to cons “by fans
>>for fans”….
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>2) Some of this determination of mine is further prompted by the utter
>>debacle known as the Anime Expo 2004 Masquerade Workmanship “Judging”,
>>at which my children ATTEMPTED to debut their first-ever self-made
>>costume set. (I say ATTEMPTED, because we ended up withdrawing due to
>>the extreme offensiveness of the way we were treated.) Gods, do we
>>NEED better judged and better run cons at Anime Masquerades. I for one
>>would like to promote a LOT more big-name cosplayer pressure on Con
>>staff for ICG-style Masqs. For this, or course, we need to get more
>>cosplayers in the ICG…
>>
>>If you have any time to read about the AX’04 Masq., the whole sordid
>>mess is detailed in this Cosplay.Com thread:
>>http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702
>>
>>If you don’t have much time, at least perhaps try page 1, and here are
>>a couple of the pages where I am in the discussion, if you care to
>>scroll to my posts:
>>http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702&page=3&pp=15
>>http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702&page=5&pp=15
>>
>>In any case, the entire situation was absolutely disgusting,
>>especially after how incredibly well things were done last year,
>>
>>My KIDS, 13 and 9, who busted their butts over their workmanship (and
>>the youngest spent time in the emergency room for sewing through her
>>finger with the machine) have been absolutely insulted and demeaned.
>>(Plucky them, they are improving on their entry and taking it to
>>Worldcon instead.) I am incensed.
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>3) I’ve been costuming for 31 years. How the heck can I get some
>>experience judging? It would give me more clout among these people
>>almost half my age, many of whom already have quite a bit of judging
>>experience. I’d be happy to do an apprenticeship or something…. I
>>just have never done judging before.
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Anyway, thanks for putting up with my rambling. Gotta go crash now.
>>See you soon somewhere, hopefully. (Worldcon?) *hugs*
>>
>>
>>– Karisu-sama (Chris)
>>———————————-
>> Moero!!
>>
>>
>>
>>

 

Group: runacc Message: 772 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….

On Jul 15, 2004, at 2:50 PM, martingear wrote:

> Andy, please tell Karisu-sama for me that I would love to have had the
> opportunity to judge her daughters’ costumes and give them the respect
> that they deserved.

Well, since we just confirmed with Richard Hill that we’re judging at
N4 we’ll be able to do so ourselves. They’re going, and the kids are
competing.

Note: haven’t seen the costumes, don’t know jack about them.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 773 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

The current file is in MS Word. It’s not in db form, but it’s more than we
had before.

I don’t know Excel. Last db I worked with was dBase III+. (Don’t laugh.)

–Karen

At 05:25 PM 7/14/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:54 PM, Bruno wrote:
> > I haven’t used the DB feature in Yahoo!Groups much, but I’d rather see
> > the
> > list in Excel or some other popular DB program which could easily be
> > manipulated and used to generate mailing labels and form letters.
>
>Yahoogroups DBs export rather nicely, and the output can be sucked into
>whatever software you choose for printing labels and form letters.
>
>andy
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
>…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 774 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

Excel or Access are fairly cooperative and do have merge capability which is
very nice for labels & form letters.
All you need is someone to do some quick data entry for starters and then
the thing will just grow on it’s own. 148 records wouldn’t take that long;
I’m not exactly offering but database management is what I get paid for so
it would be relatively painless. And would benefit CC25’s FFF eventually as
well.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
> The current file is in MS Word. It’s not in db form, but it’s more than we
> had before.
> I don’t know Excel. Last db I worked with was dBase III+. (Don’t laugh.)
> –Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 775 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: – hotels

We bring a photo album with us.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: <henryosier@cs.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

> In a message dated 7/13/2004 6:59:04 PM Central Daylight Time,
> bruno@soulmasque.com writes:
> > I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s
never
> > been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than
to
> > just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
> > masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would
be
> > nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things at
CC;
> > masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels.
I
> > think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would be
the
> > best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.
> This method works well with hotels that ask “So what happens at your
> function?”
> Henry
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 776 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Fwd: Costume Con, Anime Expo, and so forth….
I think, with Marty’s comments and my havng made some contacts with both
Nandesukan and Anime X (I’m not sure if I’ve heard from Anime Iowa yet —
have to check my mail), offering to do workmanship judging is a great idea
for us to follow up. Also, handing out a free membership as a prize.

VERY promising contact with the Cosplay.com folks!

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 777 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Way to go, Mike. As I think I mentioned, those are the two we want to hit.
Good suggestion: a promo video. I’d bet Carl (and I) could put together
some sort of 5-10 minute piece that includes a anime character or two.

Andy: Do you think there’d be any interest in doing something like this?
the logistics would have to be worked out with the respective concoms.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

> I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s
never
> been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than to
> just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
> masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would be
> nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things at
CC;
> masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels. I
> think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would be
the
> best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.
>
> The big Anime conventions in the Midwest that people from here travel to
are
> ACEN (Anime Central) and Anime Iowa. ACEN was in May and I think Anime
Iowa
> is in August.
>
> I also emailed Kevin Lillard who run A Fan’s View and probably has the
most
> extensive photo collection of cosplayers, and he has added CC23 to his
list
> of “Other Conventions of Interest”.
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> > Lots of good info, there, Mike. On the surface, this doesn’t sound very
> > incouraging, but on the other hadn, it sounds like you made a few
inroads.
> > We’ve stated all along that we would only expect about 10% to show
> interest,
> > but that’s still a potential sizable number of people.
> >
> > From wht you’ve said, I think we could tailor panels to the interest of
> the
> > attendees. I’d bet a panel on traditional Japanese costume construction
> > might draw some people. I think one thing I’d probably wear there is
> one
> > or two of my hantens I wear regularly when the weather’s appropriate.
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 778 From: Bruno Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Nora,

Don’t just include anime costumes in the video to show at anime cons. When
I showed the videos at the cosplay workshop, the first one I showed was from
Nan Desu Kan 2 years ago, it generated a lot of commentary, rarely
flattering. However, the next video I showed was my Masquerade montage,
with CC, WC, & Balticon clips. They were mostly silent through it, except
for the oooh’s and aaaah’s.

Cosplayers see anime costumes all the time, but they rarely, if ever, get to
see really amazing, original stuff.

Michael

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

> Way to go, Mike. As I think I mentioned, those are the two we want to
hit.
> Good suggestion: a promo video. I’d bet Carl (and I) could put together
> some sort of 5-10 minute piece that includes a anime character or two.
>
> Andy: Do you think there’d be any interest in doing something like this?
> the logistics would have to be worked out with the respective concoms.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
>
>
> > I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s
> never
> > been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than
to
> > just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
> > masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would
be
> > nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things at
> CC;
> > masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels.
I
> > think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would be
> the
> > best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.
> >
> > The big Anime conventions in the Midwest that people from here travel to
> are
> > ACEN (Anime Central) and Anime Iowa. ACEN was in May and I think Anime
> Iowa
> > is in August.
> >
> > I also emailed Kevin Lillard who run A Fan’s View and probably has the
> most
> > extensive photo collection of cosplayers, and he has added CC23 to his
> list
> > of “Other Conventions of Interest”.
> >
> >
> > —– Original Message —–
> > > Lots of good info, there, Mike. On the surface, this doesn’t sound
very
> > > incouraging, but on the other hadn, it sounds like you made a few
> inroads.
> > > We’ve stated all along that we would only expect about 10% to show
> > interest,
> > > but that’s still a potential sizable number of people.
> > >
> > > From wht you’ve said, I think we could tailor panels to the interest
of
> > the
> > > attendees. I’d bet a panel on traditional Japanese costume
construction
> > > might draw some people. I think one thing I’d probably wear there
is
> > one
> > > or two of my hantens I wear regularly when the weather’s appropriate.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 779 From: martingear Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

Karen –
Depending on how it is laid out in Word, it can be trivial to suck it
into Excel. Excel is really a spread sheet and is much less
sophisticated than dBase III

^M^

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>The current file is in MS Word. It’s not in db form, but it’s more than we
>had before.
>
>I don’t know Excel. Last db I worked with was dBase III+. (Don’t laugh.)
>
>–Karen
>
>At 05:25 PM 7/14/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>>On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:54 PM, Bruno wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I haven’t used the DB feature in Yahoo!Groups much, but I’d rather see
>>>the
>>>list in Excel or some other popular DB program which could easily be
>>>manipulated and used to generate mailing labels and form letters.
>>>
>>>
>>Yahoogroups DBs export rather nicely, and the output can be sucked into
>>whatever software you choose for printing labels and form letters.
>>
>>andy
>>
>>–
>>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>>(Kevin’s)
>>…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 780 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Mailing List

Marty, the next time we’re down (no rush), can you walk me through Excel
and PowerPoint?

I’m not current on some software, but I *know* I can pick it up quickly if
somebody just shows me vs. stumbling through it myself. That technique
worked great when a friend taught me PhotoShop.

Lisa Ashton said you were a good teacher on PowerPoint!

I used to be 6 months ahead of the curve on hardware and software, but now,
due to finances, I am *years* behind…painful…

–Karen

At 10:37 PM 7/15/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Karen –
>Depending on how it is laid out in Word, it can be trivial to suck it
>into Excel. Excel is really a spread sheet and is much less
>sophisticated than dBase III
>
>^M^
>
>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> >The current file is in MS Word. It’s not in db form, but it’s more than we
> >had before.
> >
> >I don’t know Excel. Last db I worked with was dBase III+. (Don’t laugh.)
> >
> >–Karen
> >
> >At 05:25 PM 7/14/2004 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:54 PM, Bruno wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I haven’t used the DB feature in Yahoo!Groups much, but I’d rather see
> >>>the
> >>>list in Excel or some other popular DB program which could easily be
> >>>manipulated and used to generate mailing labels and form letters.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Yahoogroups DBs export rather nicely, and the output can be sucked into
> >>whatever software you choose for printing labels and form letters.
> >>
> >>andy
> >>
> >>–
> >>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> >>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> >>(Kevin’s)
> >>…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 781 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/15/2004
Subject: livejournal?
If anybody here is doing the livejournal thing, please consider adding
the following to your “interests” list

icg
costume-con

I’m thinking of setting up a costume-con livejournal community, it might
be another way to promote online.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 782 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

Andrew Trembley wrote:

> I’m thinking of setting up a costume-con livejournal community, it might
> be another way to promote online.

Went ahead and did it…
http://www.livejournal.com/community/costume_con/

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 783 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Excel & Powerpoint

Hey!

If Marty can’t do it, Dan and I can. I use Excel all the time (including
processing the labels for the newsletter – well over 800 names), and Dan
uses Powerpoint all the time in giving his briefings for work and the Guard.

I could probably show you all you need to know about how Excel works
(including mail merges to Word) in less than an hour….

Cheers,

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Marty, the next time we’re down (no rush), can you walk me through Excel
> and PowerPoint?
>
> I’m not current on some software, but I *know* I can pick it up quickly if
> somebody just shows me vs. stumbling through it myself. That technique
> worked great when a friend taught me PhotoShop.
>
> Lisa Ashton said you were a good teacher on PowerPoint!
>
> I used to be 6 months ahead of the curve on hardware and software, but now,
> due to finances, I am *years* behind…painful…
>
> –Karen



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 784 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

That was Bruce. And I think he meant that it’d be nice to include a cosplay
costume or two amongst the rest.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
> Nora,
>
> Don’t just include anime costumes in the video to show at anime cons.
When
> I showed the videos at the cosplay workshop, the first one I showed was
from
> Nan Desu Kan 2 years ago, it generated a lot of commentary, rarely
> flattering. However, the next video I showed was my Masquerade montage,
> with CC, WC, & Balticon clips. They were mostly silent through it, except
> for the oooh’s and aaaah’s.
>
> Cosplayers see anime costumes all the time, but they rarely, if ever, get
to
> see really amazing, original stuff.
>
>
> Michael
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
>
>
> > Way to go, Mike. As I think I mentioned, those are the two we want to
> hit.
> > Good suggestion: a promo video. I’d bet Carl (and I) could put together
> > some sort of 5-10 minute piece that includes a anime character or two.
> >
> > Andy: Do you think there’d be any interest in doing something like
this?
> > the logistics would have to be worked out with the respective concoms.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > —– Original Message —–
> > From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
> > To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
> >
> >
> > > I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s
> > never
> > > been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than
> to
> > > just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
> > > masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would
> be
> > > nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things
at
> > CC;
> > > masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels.
> I
> > > think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would
be
> > the
> > > best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.
> > >
> > > The big Anime conventions in the Midwest that people from here travel
to
> > are
> > > ACEN (Anime Central) and Anime Iowa. ACEN was in May and I think
Anime
> > Iowa
> > > is in August.
> > >
> > > I also emailed Kevin Lillard who run A Fan’s View and probably has the
> > most
> > > extensive photo collection of cosplayers, and he has added CC23 to his
> > list
> > > of “Other Conventions of Interest”.
> > >
> > >
> > > —– Original Message —–
> > > > Lots of good info, there, Mike. On the surface, this doesn’t sound
> very
> > > > incouraging, but on the other hadn, it sounds like you made a few
> > inroads.
> > > > We’ve stated all along that we would only expect about 10% to show
> > > interest,
> > > > but that’s still a potential sizable number of people.
> > > >
> > > > From wht you’ve said, I think we could tailor panels to the interest
> of
> > > the
> > > > attendees. I’d bet a panel on traditional Japanese costume
> construction
> > > > might draw some people. I think one thing I’d probably wear there
> is
> > > one
> > > > or two of my hantens I wear regularly when the weather’s
appropriate.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 785 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

Excuse my ignorance but what is a “live hournal”? I don’t do ‘chat rooms’,
‘blogs’ or ‘forums’ – is it like that?

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> If anybody here is doing the livejournal thing, please consider adding
> the following to your “interests” list
>
> icg
> costume-con
>
> I’m thinking of setting up a costume-con livejournal community, it might
> be another way to promote online.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 786 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/16/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Excuse my ignorance but what is a “live hournal”? I don’t do ‘chat
> rooms’,
> ‘blogs’ or ‘forums’ – is it like that?

Livejournal http://www.livejournal.com/ is one of the original blog
services (you didn’t need to run your own blog software to use it).

Basic functionality is free. If you want to customize your journal,
it’s $25/year for advanced services. I paid the money and did a bit of
work to make http://bovil.livejournal.com/ look like
http://www.bovil.com/

A nice (basic) function is the “friends” aggregator. If you have
journals you like to watch, list them as “friends” and your “friends”
page will display their posts.

Another nice (basic) function is the “interests” matcher. Enter a
series of comma-separated keywords (“icg, costume-con, costuming,
slcg”) and you can find people and communities (more about that in a
moment) that share keywords with you. I found a few local friends who I
didn’t know were on LJ by using the GBACG keyword.

Along with personal journals, LJ offers community journals. These are
kind of like web forums, but kind of not. There are two options when
dealing with communities: “watching” (essentially making the community
a “friend” of yours so community posts appear on your “friends” page)
and being a “member” (which puts your posts on the community “friends”
page and may grant you the right to post directly into the community).

I’ve been watching a few conventions use LJ to promote themselves and
disseminate information. BayCon, Yaoi-Con and Further Confusion (to
name just a few) have LiveJournal communities. There are a ton of
cosplay communities. Dany Slone (our Malfoy recreationista) created a
con_masquerade community that is slowly growing (particularly after bad
masquerades like AX2004).

It’s a marketing/distribution tool, it’s free, and we ought to be using
it.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 787 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/19/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint

I believe Nora had volunteered as well….

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <bdelaney@hawkeswood.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:31 AM
Subject: [runacc] Excel & Powerpoint

> Hey!
>
> If Marty can’t do it, Dan and I can. I use Excel all the time (including
> processing the labels for the newsletter – well over 800 names), and Dan
> uses Powerpoint all the time in giving his briefings for work and the
Guard.
>
> I could probably show you all you need to know about how Excel works
> (including mail merges to Word) in less than an hour….
>
> Cheers,
>
> Betsy
>
> Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> > Marty, the next time we’re down (no rush), can you walk me through Excel
> > and PowerPoint?
> >
> > I’m not current on some software, but I *know* I can pick it up quickly
if
> > somebody just shows me vs. stumbling through it myself. That technique
> > worked great when a friend taught me PhotoShop.
> >
> > Lisa Ashton said you were a good teacher on PowerPoint!
> >
> > I used to be 6 months ahead of the curve on hardware and software, but
now,
> > due to finances, I am *years* behind…painful…
> >
> > –Karen
>
> —
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Web Mistress at large
>
> ************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
> ************************************************************************
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 788 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/19/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

I guess I’m not seeing the value here. How many people are we talking to
potentioally reach? This just sounds like a different form of the bulletin
board. Besides, wer’e already on several lists that we really cant’ spend
the time on having to mantain another daily demand on our limted time.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] livejournal?

> On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Excuse my ignorance but what is a “live hournal”? I don’t do ‘chat
> > rooms’,
> > ‘blogs’ or ‘forums’ – is it like that?
>
> Livejournal http://www.livejournal.com/ is one of the original blog
> services (you didn’t need to run your own blog software to use it).
>
> Basic functionality is free. If you want to customize your journal,
> it’s $25/year for advanced services. I paid the money and did a bit of
> work to make http://bovil.livejournal.com/ look like
> http://www.bovil.com/
>
> A nice (basic) function is the “friends” aggregator. If you have
> journals you like to watch, list them as “friends” and your “friends”
> page will display their posts.
>
> Another nice (basic) function is the “interests” matcher. Enter a
> series of comma-separated keywords (“icg, costume-con, costuming,
> slcg”) and you can find people and communities (more about that in a
> moment) that share keywords with you. I found a few local friends who I
> didn’t know were on LJ by using the GBACG keyword.
>
> Along with personal journals, LJ offers community journals. These are
> kind of like web forums, but kind of not. There are two options when
> dealing with communities: “watching” (essentially making the community
> a “friend” of yours so community posts appear on your “friends” page)
> and being a “member” (which puts your posts on the community “friends”
> page and may grant you the right to post directly into the community).
>
> I’ve been watching a few conventions use LJ to promote themselves and
> disseminate information. BayCon, Yaoi-Con and Further Confusion (to
> name just a few) have LiveJournal communities. There are a ton of
> cosplay communities. Dany Slone (our Malfoy recreationista) created a
> con_masquerade community that is slowly growing (particularly after bad
> masquerades like AX2004).
>
> It’s a marketing/distribution tool, it’s free, and we ought to be using
> it.
>
> —
> Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
> The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
> http://www.bovil.com/
> Moo!
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 789 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint

Thanks, Bruce!

I just figured that we’re a little closer if Karen wants a face to face
instruction session.

I’ve been using spreadsheets in one form or another for the last 16
years or so, for all sorts of things, and as I said, I presently use
Excel to generate the mailing labels for the newsletter, so I have very
fresh experience on making it work with Word.

Dan has to use PP to produce all sorts of things for work and for the
Guard, so he’s equally savvy on that end.

That’s why I offered…

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I believe Nora had volunteered as well….
>
> Bruce



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 790 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I guess I’m not seeing the value here. How many people are we talking to
> potentioally reach? This just sounds like a different form of the bulletin
> board. Besides, wer’e already on several lists that we really cant’ spend
> the time on having to mantain another daily demand on our limted time.

Total people? Well, my membership number is 3826481 (and yes, they
started at 1, John O’Halloran’s number is in the 6000’s).

Just about any costume-related interest term is going to max out the
match counter at 500.

Some of the established con communities are between 100-200 members.
Established costume communites are also in that sort of range, though
some are larger.

As to the value? That’s for you to determine. I’ve found numerous
bay-area costume fans on LJ who aren’t on any of the mailing lists I’m
on. As a matter of fact, I found a Chicago costume fan who goes to
Archon regularly in the con_costuming community. Pretty valuable from my
perspective.

It all comes down to a simple fact. If you want to reach out to new
groups of potential members, you have to reach. You can’t stick with the
old methods unless you’re going to be satisfied with the old results.

The free-association model of LJ results in a different dynamic than
mailing lists or web fora (after 15 years of mailing lists, I actually
find it kind of refreshing), and draws different sorts of people.

Kevin keeps reminding me “We don’t have to do it all ourselves, we’ve
got a committee.” I don’t do web fora myself (I tried years ago, but I
could never pay attention to any forum for more than a week or so), but
I know we can’t ignore them. We recruited a moderator of the cosplay.com
fora to our bid/marketing committee to reach out to cosplayers through a
media that’s popular with them.

Troll through your committee; you may find people who participate in
these groups. Jeff Morris is on LiveJournal (I know, he’s on my
“friends” list).

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 791 From: martingear Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
If nobody minds, I’m perfectly willing to help Karen and I’ve told her
so. BTW, I’ve been using Excel since it was called MultiPlan running on
a Commodore 64 (pre Microsoft) as well as Lotus 1-2-3, Quattro, and a
Swedish spread sheet that shall remain nameless. Similarly, I use Power
Point not only for business but also for fun (See Susan deG’s “Vampire
Jeopardy”, I did the Power Point programming.)

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 792 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
Thanks to everyone for your kind offers to help instruct me.

I will definitely need in-person exposure, so I think that kinda leaves out
the Mais (but THANK YOU for offering).

I guess it just depends where I am next and who I see first. 🙂

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 793 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: livejournal?

Yeah, I struggle with the time thing, too on a daily basis.

Andy, how do you juggle all this stuff and have a life? I need about 48
hours in a day already, and my head is going to explode if I add one more
thing.

–Karen (who already follows several chat boards and moderates 3 groups on
a daily basis)

At 10:02 PM 7/19/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>I guess I’m not seeing the value here. How many people are we talking to
>potentioally reach? This just sounds like a different form of the bulletin
>board. Besides, wer’e already on several lists that we really cant’ spend
>the time on having to mantain another daily demand on our limted time.
>
>Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 794 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: time (was Re: [runacc] livejournal?

On Jul 20, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Andy, how do you juggle all this stuff and have a life? I need about 48
> hours in a day already, and my head is going to explode if I add one
> more
> thing.

Well…

First of all you assume I have a life. Until Kevin steps down as
Emperor, that’s not entirely true. Everything is already scheduled
through March next year, including “getting away from it all” time.

As for the computer stuff:

When work is going well it’s a firefighter-like job. I get paid to
spend time in front of a computer, and if I’m doing my job well nothing
is going wrong, so I’ve got a lot of flexibility.

Mailing lists are easy for me, but email is the main focus of my job.
I’ve built extensive filters to manage my email. All mail is sorted
into folders, and spam is dropped into a side folder for more automated
and manual checking.

Some lists I ignore unless I’m looking for something. I’m on 4
motorcycle mailing lists, but I trash three of them without even
reading most days. I also ignore a lot of the inane jabber. I just
junked the “astrology” and “lottery” threads on ICG-D; saves me a lot
of time.

I moderate a half-dozen email lists, but they’re well-behaved so it’s
mostly a “set it and forget it” kind of work. Once in a while I have to
add people to a closed list. Once in a while I have to approve an
announcement on a moderated announcements list. Rarely amounts to more
than about 5 minutes of my week.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 795 From: Bruno Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Write-up about Marty
Here’s an excerpt the text from the convention write-up of Katsucon, where Marty did workmanship judging. http://www.fansview.com/2004/katsucon/kanotes.htm

————————————

But if anything left people with a good feeling from the convention weekend, it was the Saturday night costume contest. The event started way too late, but the show that followed was worth the wait. And the award presentation gave anime convention costumers an unique, independent validation of their hard work.

In the same way that the Westminster Dog Show has a single judge to choose the event’s best of show entrant, and that judge is selected long in advance for his expertise, Katsucon had a single, experienced workmanship judge. That person, Marty Gear, was not familiar with anime conventions, but he had long experience with costuming. Gear had been in charge of judging and organizing at many Balticons and the national Costume Con, and he was familiar with the level of costuming at the many World Science Fiction Conventions.

The workmanship award winners you see on this site all were Gear’s choices. He was exceptionally impressed with all of those winners, and his lengthy comments at the end of the Saturday night costume contest made it clear that the perceived performance gap between the best sci-fi convention costumes and anime convention costumes has been closed. Gear said that the honorable mention workmanship winners were good enough to win top honors at the other conventions he’s attended, and he encouraged all of the Saturday night awardees to head to this year’s Balticon and compete.

Gear praised the top robot costumes for their use of materials, saying the fiberglass work on one outfit had a better surface than his car. He enjoyed the mallet of a Skuld costumer for being made out of hard-to-work hardwood rather than softwood. He was impressed with the use of fabric on the best entries. One entry got a workmanship award for an arching pair of six-foot feathered wings: Gear said he made that award because he knew first-hand the difficulty of working with feathers. And – very important for those who want to win – he gave several awards to costumers who brought documentation to show how their outfits matched the original costume designs.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 796 From: martingear Date: 7/20/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty
Bruno –
Thanks for the pointer to the write-up and the pictures. The red robot
that I gave the Workmanship Judge’s Award to was a novice, and his
fibreglass finish was outstanding. Having owned an early Corvette I
have a certain amount of familiarity with how difficult a medium this is
to work with and I’ve seen award winning custom cars that were not as
well done.

“Tiki” Brown who got the Workmanship Special Award not only did her
costume which lit up, blinked and rotated, but also made two other
costumes for her group and part of a third. What impressed me most was
that all of her wiring was in harness and dressed inside parts of the
outfit that no one would ever see. In a totally different genre she
reminded me of the kind of work Adrian did. BTW, when her group came up
for workmanship judging they had someone with a power point presentation
that showed various views of the sources for each costume as I was
judging it.

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 797 From: Bruno Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty

Marty,

I looked at the Masquerade photos before looking at the award photos. When
I first saw the red armor (ronin warrior?), my first thought was “nice
armor”.

I just sent out an inquiry to the local to find out about the other group,
as it looks really neat, but I have no idea what it is from. Their
documentation sounds most impressive, and having a laptop available, it
sounds like a means to show the media documentation that printouts or color
copies, which can be expensive and not necessarily show the true colors.

I think that your work at the judging was more than well received at the
convention and probably the best advertising that we have for getting
cosplayers, at least from that area, to cross over to CC.

Michael

—– Original Message —–
From: “martingear” <MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Write-up about Marty

> Bruno –
> Thanks for the pointer to the write-up and the pictures. The red robot
> that I gave the Workmanship Judge’s Award to was a novice, and his
> fibreglass finish was outstanding. Having owned an early Corvette I
> have a certain amount of familiarity with how difficult a medium this is
> to work with and I’ve seen award winning custom cars that were not as
> well done.
>
> “Tiki” Brown who got the Workmanship Special Award not only did her
> costume which lit up, blinked and rotated, but also made two other
> costumes for her group and part of a third. What impressed me most was
> that all of her wiring was in harness and dressed inside parts of the
> outfit that no one would ever see. In a totally different genre she
> reminded me of the kind of work Adrian did. BTW, when her group came up
> for workmanship judging they had someone with a power point presentation
> that showed various views of the sources for each costume as I was
> judging it.
>
> Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 798 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint

Hey, Marty!

I’m not trying to step on toes here – just making a friendly offer in
case Karen needs the info when you’re not available to teach. I never
questioned your ability, just provided info on my own.

IMHO, more options are generally better.

YMMV.

Cheers,

Betsy

martingear wrote:

> If nobody minds, I’m perfectly willing to help Karen and I’ve told her
> so. BTW, I’ve been using Excel since it was called MultiPlan running on
> a Commodore 64 (pre Microsoft) as well as Lotus 1-2-3, Quattro, and a
> Swedish spread sheet that shall remain nameless. Similarly, I use Power
> Point not only for business but also for fun (See Susan deG’s “Vampire
> Jeopardy”, I did the Power Point programming.)
>
> Marty



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 799 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Excel & Powerpoint
OK, putting on Moderator’s hat…

Let’s take this discussion offlist, as it has little or nothing to do with
Costume-Con except that these are “common denominator” programs that a lot
of people use and I don’t (yet).

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 800 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/21/2004
Subject: Re: Write-up about Marty

Way to go, Marty!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruno<mailto:bruno@soulmasque.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: [runacc] Write-up about Marty

Here’s an excerpt the text from the convention write-up of Katsucon, where Marty did workmanship judging. http://www.fansview.com/2004/katsucon/kanotes.htm<http://www.fansview.com/2004/katsucon/kanotes.htm>

————————————

But if anything left people with a good feeling from the convention weekend, it was the Saturday night costume contest. The event started way too late, but the show that followed was worth the wait. And the award presentation gave anime convention costumers an unique, independent validation of their hard work.

In the same way that the Westminster Dog Show has a single judge to choose the event’s best of show entrant, and that judge is selected long in advance for his expertise, Katsucon had a single, experienced workmanship judge. That person, Marty Gear, was not familiar with anime conventions, but he had long experience with costuming. Gear had been in charge of judging and organizing at many Balticons and the national Costume Con, and he was familiar with the level of costuming at the many World Science Fiction Conventions.

The workmanship award winners you see on this site all were Gear’s choices. He was exceptionally impressed with all of those winners, and his lengthy comments at the end of the Saturday night costume contest made it clear that the perceived performance gap between the best sci-fi convention costumes and anime convention costumes has been closed. Gear said that the honorable mention workmanship winners were good enough to win top honors at the other conventions he’s attended, and he encouraged all of the Saturday night awardees to head to this year’s Balticon and compete.

Gear praised the top robot costumes for their use of materials, saying the fiberglass work on one outfit had a better surface than his car. He enjoyed the mallet of a Skuld costumer for being made out of hard-to-work hardwood rather than softwood. He was impressed with the use of fabric on the best entries. One entry got a workmanship award for an arching pair of six-foot feathered wings: Gear said he made that award because he knew first-hand the difficulty of working with feathers. And – very important for those who want to win – he gave several awards to costumers who brought documentation to show how their outfits matched the original costume designs.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 15 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 15 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 701 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Just administrivia – adding members
Group: runacc Message: 702 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 703 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/1/2004
Subject: update…Karen now moderating too!
Group: runacc Message: 704 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 705 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 706 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 707 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 708 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 709 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 710 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Fwd: [ICG-D] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 711 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
Group: runacc Message: 712 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 713 From: Charles Galway Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 714 From: David Doering Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 715 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [runacc] Avocational vs. Hobbyist]
Group: runacc Message: 716 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 717 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 718 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 719 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 720 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 721 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 722 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 723 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Anime Primer (was Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 724 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 725 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 726 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 727 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 728 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 729 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 730 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 731 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 732 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 733 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 734 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Primer (was Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
Group: runacc Message: 735 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 736 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 737 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 738 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 739 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Astro Boy 40th
Group: runacc Message: 740 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Astro Boy 40th
Group: runacc Message: 741 From: Bruno Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 742 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 743 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 744 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 745 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: The ugly AX report…
Group: runacc Message: 746 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 747 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 748 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Group: runacc Message: 749 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Challenges on Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 750 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 701 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Just administrivia – adding members
Hi, folks!

Just a quick message to let you know:

I’ve just added Michael Bruno and Byron Connell to the list.

If you want to recommend adding someone to the list, requests should go
to me, (at least for the short term, subject to change at some point).

If you’re on this list and you didn’t intend to be, or don’t want to
stay, let me know and I’ll remove your email addy.

You can manipulate a lot of what the group can do for you by visiting
the Yahoo Groups page. This includes setting calendar items, uploading
files, reading archives, and so on.

If you have any questions, please let me know!

Thanks,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 702 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

However, when we need to be brief, such as with the mundane press, on a

>flyer, or in an ad, what would be most appropriate?
>

How about ignoring descriptives totally, and opting for something along the
lines of, “Costumers of every skill level and a wide variety of costume
interests. These fields of interest may include…………..”

Elaine

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 9 Dial-up Internet Access fights spam and pop-ups � now 3 months FREE!
http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 703 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/1/2004
Subject: update…Karen now moderating too!
Hi, folks!

I’ve added Karen as a full moderator for the group. Requests to add,
remove, etc. can now go to either of us.

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 704 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help
As most of you probably know, Ricky and I are running the Fashion Design
Contest for CC-23.

I really could use address lists of designers who have participated in the
last two contests, in the hopes we can do a mailing to them to jump-start
the contest. I don’t have the last two Folios within easy reach (they’re in
the house…somewhere).

Henry and Trudy, if you could contact the people on your committees who ran
the Folio for you and see if they can get address lists to me, that would
be GREAT!

Fran Evans has supplied me with her address list of designers, but some of
the addresses on it are known to be old and need to be verified. My own
address list dates to Costume-Con 9, so it is even older than Fran’s and
probably even more unreliable.

Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. We’ll be flyering
other conventions, too, but doing a direct mailing to known designers is
probably going to reap the most benefits at this point.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 705 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

What about “Costume enthusiast”?

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <bdelaney@hawkeswood.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Avocational vs. Hobbyist

> Not to plagiarize, but here’s what the ICG lists on their site:
>
> “We welcome everyone with an interest in the art of costuming – from
> concept to assembly to display and all stages in between – in all areas
> of costume. Our members include historic reenactors, professional,
> educational and community theatrical costumers, science fiction
> fans,renaissance festival participants, and a vast array of others who
> are interested in the making, wearing and display of costume.”
>
> It isn’t the shortest sentence in the world, but it does convey the
> important stuff. Some tweaking to allow for “original” text might be
> good, and it could, in theory, be shortened, but if you’re sending out a
> press release, that’s how I’d phrase it.
>
> I recall sitting in the lobby at the Lord Baltimore talking to a
> reporter just after the Fashion Show at CCXV, explaining who we were. It
> took quite some time. Fortunately, I had Bridget Landry and Vicki Warren
> wander by – a rocket scientist and nuclear physicist respectively. It
> was a prime example of the reach we have, and the ecclectic composition
> of our crowd.
>
> I’d emphasize the crossroads theme when talking about the different
> aspects of our community, to bring focus to that theme. And for a deeper
> explanation, you can always point them to your web site and to mine,
> which contains an excellent explanation of our history at:
>
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/genesis.shtml
>
> -b
>
> David Doering wrote:
> >
> > >Henry wrote: “We shouldn’t try to label who comes to CC’s.”
> >
> > Betsy wrote: “I don’t think we should even try to reduce the kind of
people
> > Costume-Con attracts to one label…”
> >
> > Don’t get me wrong. I too want every kind of costumer–Royal Court,
Middle
> > Eastern, Furry, Anime, Historical–to come. I also don’t want to label
any
> > group as “the chosen ones” versus the “groundlings.” Hence our
“crossroads”
> > theme for CC23.
> >
> > However, when we need to be brief, such as with the mundane press, on a
> > flyer, or in an ad, what would be most appropriate?
> >
> > Dave D.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> >
> > *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129j4fok1/M=298184.5022502.6152625.3001176/D=gr
oups/S=1707300337:HM/EXP=1088643671/A=2164339/R=0/SIG=11e2d64in/*http://www.
netflix.com/Default?mqso=60183348>
> >
> >
> > ————————————————————————
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
>
> —
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Web Mistress at large
>
> ************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
> ************************************************************************
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 706 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help

Karen –

Steve Swope and Karen Heim ran our Folio. Karen would probably be the best
bet for the addresses, since she’s the one who mailed them all out.

Trudy

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Need Fashion Design Contest Help
>Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 13:04:54 -0400
>
>As most of you probably know, Ricky and I are running the Fashion Design
>Contest for CC-23.
>
>I really could use address lists of designers who have participated in the
>last two contests, in the hopes we can do a mailing to them to jump-start
>the contest. I don’t have the last two Folios within easy reach (they’re in
>the house…somewhere).
>
>Henry and Trudy, if you could contact the people on your committees who ran
>the Folio for you and see if they can get address lists to me, that would
>be GREAT!
>
>Fran Evans has supplied me with her address list of designers, but some of
>the addresses on it are known to be old and need to be verified. My own
>address list dates to Costume-Con 9, so it is even older than Fran’s and
>probably even more unreliable.
>
>Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. We’ll be flyering
>other conventions, too, but doing a direct mailing to known designers is
>probably going to reap the most benefits at this point.
>
>–Karen
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 707 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/5/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help

Hi, guys –

We did the one for CC 21 – we’ll see if we can get the list off the old
computer.

P & S

At 12:04 PM 7/5/2004, you wrote:

>As most of you probably know, Ricky and I are running the Fashion Design
>Contest for CC-23.
>
>I really could use address lists of designers who have participated in the
>last two contests, in the hopes we can do a mailing to them to jump-start
>the contest. I don’t have the last two Folios within easy reach (they’re in
>the house…somewhere).
>
>Henry and Trudy, if you could contact the people on your committees who ran
>the Folio for you and see if they can get address lists to me, that would
>be GREAT!
>
>Fran Evans has supplied me with her address list of designers, but some of
>the addresses on it are known to be old and need to be verified. My own
>address list dates to Costume-Con 9, so it is even older than Fran’s and
>probably even more unreliable.
>
>Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. We’ll be flyering
>other conventions, too, but doing a direct mailing to known designers is
>probably going to reap the most benefits at this point.
>
>–Karen
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 708 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help

Thanks!

I have a list of about 100 names from Fran Evans. Currently trying to
update / verify some of the addresses before doing a mailing. And I’m sure
there are names that should be on there that are not on there yet. (Her
list is several years old.)

–Karen

At 10:39 PM 7/5/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>Hi, guys –
>
>We did the one for CC 21 – we’ll see if we can get the list off the old
>computer.
>
>P & S

 

Group: runacc Message: 709 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help

Thanks!

I’ll drop her an email.

–Karen

At 10:39 PM 7/5/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Karen –
>
>Steve Swope and Karen Heim ran our Folio. Karen would probably be the best
>bet for the addresses, since she’s the one who mailed them all out.
>
>Trudy

 

Group: runacc Message: 710 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Fwd: [ICG-D] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

I am forwarding this because I feel we should all go look at these links (I
did).

I can’t explain it, but the energy I “feel” in these photos (especially in
the second link) reminds me of the media cons I attended in the 70’s, the
Comic-Con masquerade when the con first started to get big in the 80’s, and
the big WorldCon masquerades of the 80’s. I’m especially impressed with the
“mecha” suits.

I don’t know how, but Costume-Con REALLY needs to court these kids. The
anime cons could now be the feeder system for us that the S/F cons are not.

Good re-creation costuming from media sources is still good costuming.

–Karen

>X-eGroups-Return:
>sentto-2301349-20112-1089086277-castleb=pulsenet.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
>X-Sender: dany@lara-goth.com
>X-Apparently-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>Thread-Index: AcRjBJCWAANHlTaeQaOKGNrsRyrSigAB9xkg
>X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.163.168.184
>From: “Dany” <dany@lara-goth.com>
>X-Yahoo-Profile: alariahdevonwood
>Mailing-List: list ICG-D@yahoogroups.com; contact ICG-D-owner@yahoogroups.com
>Delivered-To: mailing list ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ICG-D-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
>Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 20:57:51 -0700
>Subject: [ICG-D] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
>Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>X-smtp1.pulsenet.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for
>more information
>X-smtp1.pulsenet.com-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your
>Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
>X-MailScanner-From:
>sentto-2301349-20112-1089086277-castleb=pulsenet.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
>X-postmaste@pulsenet.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP
>for more information
>X-postmaste@pulsenet.com-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your
>Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
>
>I didn’t go to this, but I looked at the winners just out of curiousity, and
>because it’s one of the bigger anime masquerades. I wish the pictures were
>better, as the Rose of Versailles group looks really REALLY neat..but I
>figured many of us might like some of the work that went into these
>costumes.
>
>http://www.fansview.com/2004/animeexpo/axcosp.htm
>
>Here’s some individuals of each group as they came off the stage. Some
>better pictures than on the winners’ page..
>
>http://www.fansview.com/2004/animeexpo/ax04c.html
>
>Overall, just very cool stuff to look at…and good reference for me, as I’m
>taking on the anime end of things next year…
>
>Dany
>-already has some of the material in fact..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 711 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Need Fashion Design Contest Help

In a message dated 7/5/2004 10:50:14 PM Central Daylight Time,
costumrs@radiks.net writes:

> We did the one for CC 21 – we’ll see if we can get the list off the old
> computer.

Pierre & Sandy,
Don’t worry. I have the PreReg list on my computer and e-mailed it to
Karen.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 712 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/6/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> What about “Costume enthusiast”?

Great phrase; I use it in some of my own copy.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 713 From: Charles Galway Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

I can’t recall for certain, but I think I saw the term “enthusiast” on the “Threads” web-site, as well.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai

What about “Costume enthusiast”?

Bruce

>

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 714 From: David Doering Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

>I’m excited! I like Elaine’s “Costumers of every skill level…” as well
>as Bruce and Nora’s “Costume Enthusiast.” The former readily works for the
>general press while the latter works for furry, anime, historical, and
>SF/F fen.

Dave Doering
CC23

 

Group: runacc Message: 715 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [runacc] Avocational vs. Hobbyist]

And they have the added advantage of covering those who compete, those
who costume for other events, and those who like to look at costumes but
don’t make or wear them.

Cool!

Betsy

David Doering wrote:

>
> >I’m excited! I like Elaine’s “Costumers of every skill level…” as well
> >as Bruce and Nora’s “Costume Enthusiast.” The former readily works for
> the
> >general press while the latter works for furry, anime, historical, and
> >SF/F fen.
>
> Dave Doering
> CC23



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 716 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 7/7/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

At 12:10 AM 7/6/2004, you wrote:

>I am forwarding this because I feel we should all go look at these links (I
>did).
>
>I can’t explain it, but the energy I “feel” in these photos (especially in
>the second link) reminds me of the media cons I attended in the 70’s, the
>Comic-Con masquerade when the con first started to get big in the 80’s, and
>the big WorldCon masquerades of the 80’s. I’m especially impressed with the
>”mecha” suits.
>
>I don’t know how, but Costume-Con REALLY needs to court these kids. The
>anime cons could now be the feeder system for us that the S/F cons are not.
>
>Good re-creation costuming from media sources is still good costuming.

Oh, yes. The best of these could compete right at the top now. Some need
work, but they obviously have the energy and just need some skill building.
Perfect for a C-C. Unfortunately, we don’t have any of these cons near us.
(Des Moines is closest). Where we can, we should probably try to attend
some of these cons and promote C-C whether we’re anime fans or not.

Pierre

>–Karen
>
> >
> >I didn’t go to this, but I looked at the winners just out of curiousity, and
> >because it’s one of the bigger anime masquerades. I wish the pictures were
> >better, as the Rose of Versailles group looks really REALLY neat..but I
> >figured many of us might like some of the work that went into these
> >costumes.
> >
> >http://www.fansview.com/2004/animeexpo/axcosp.htm
> >
> >Here’s some individuals of each group as they came off the stage. Some
> >better pictures than on the winners’ page..
> >
> >http://www.fansview.com/2004/animeexpo/ax04c.html
> >
> >Overall, just very cool stuff to look at…and good reference for me, as I’m
> >taking on the anime end of things next year…
> >
> >Dany
> >-already has some of the material in fact..

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 717 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Byron and I accidentally found ourselves at an anime con 2-3 years ago. We went down to NJ for a Sick Pups meeting, and when we walked into our hotel’s lobby it was full of young people in “strange” costumes. Since we were looking very mundane, and are no longer exactly young, we got some looks from the kids, and an apologetic look from the hotel desk clerk. When I asked “Is there an anime con here this weekend” and everyone obviously expected me to be disgusted, the whole atmosphere changed immediately when I loudly said, “Oh, NEAT!!”. I was quite struck with the quality of some of the costumes – there was one young lady who had the most wonderful set of etched lucite dragonfly wings that particularly struck my fancy because of the workmanship.

The real problem, for me, is that I don’t know anything about anime – I don’t know who the “characters” are, so the costumes have no reference point. My last contact was Astro Boy, and that was a LONG time ago. It wasn’t called anime back then, either. Some of our costume fans out there are at least somewhat into the anime scene. What would be a big help for those of us who feel that it looks interesting, but don’t know where to get started, would be some pointers on the right direction(s) to get started. Personally, I’m not very interested in cutesy Power Puff Girls or strange little Pokemon critters, but I’ve seen some books/comics at our local bookstore in the anime section that have illos that looked more to my taste – a more realistic style of illustration, rather that bizarre, juvenile or distorted body types. BTW, does “A Distant Soil” fall into this category, or is that just a fantasy comic?

So tell me, where should a total anime neo start?

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger<mailto:costumrs@radiks.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Oh, yes. The best of these could compete right at the top now. Some need
work, but they obviously have the energy and just need some skill building.
Perfect for a C-C. Unfortunately, we don’t have any of these cons near us.
(Des Moines is closest). Where we can, we should probably try to attend
some of these cons and promote C-C whether we’re anime fans or not.

Pierre

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 718 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:38 AM, Christine Connell wrote:

> So tell me, where should a total anime neo start?

can I shift this over to ICG-D? it’s a bit far off-charter for RunACC…


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 719 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Andy —

Tina’s not on ICG-D.

Sorry,

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley<mailto:attrembl@bovil.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:38 AM, Christine Connell wrote:
> So tell me, where should a total anime neo start?

can I shift this over to ICG-D? it’s a bit far off-charter for RunACC…


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/<http://www.bovil.com/>
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 720 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

On Jul 8, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Byron Connell wrote:

> Andy —
>
> Tina’s not on ICG-D.

‘k, it’s just as a list moderator myself I can’t in good conscience
respond to the post on this list.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 721 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

I think it’s fairly relevant here because we keep saying we have to get the
anime people interested in CCs and a number of us don’t have a clue where to
start. While we might have an interest in anime, we’ve never been to one of
their cons, and aren’t sure how to approach this “new” type of fandom. I’d
say we’re asking for how to get started because we really want to hook up
with the anime fans on their own turf.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> ‘k, it’s just as a list moderator myself I can’t in good conscience
> respond to the post on this list.

 

Group: runacc Message: 722 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

And some of us did anime stuff “in the day” 15-20 years ago (when it was
still going by the un-PC label of “Japanimation”), but have NO idea what’s
current now.

–Karen

At 08:51 PM 7/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>I think it’s fairly relevant here because we keep saying we have to get the
>anime people interested in CCs and a number of us don’t have a clue where to
>start. While we might have an interest in anime, we’ve never been to one of
>their cons, and aren’t sure how to approach this “new” type of fandom. I’d
>say we’re asking for how to get started because we really want to hook up
>with the anime fans on their own turf.
>
>Nora
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> > ‘k, it’s just as a list moderator myself I can’t in good conscience
> > respond to the post on this list.
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 723 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/8/2004
Subject: Anime Primer (was Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

‘k, so I had a second request…

On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:38 AM, Christine Connell wrote:
> The real problem, for me, is that I don’t know anything about anime –
> I don’t know who the “characters” are, so the costumes have no
> reference point. My last contact was Astro Boy, and that was a LONG
> time ago. It wasn’t called anime back then, either. Some of our
> costume fans out there are at least somewhat into the anime scene.
> What would be a big help for those of us who feel that it looks
> interesting, but don’t know where to get started, would be some
> pointers on the right direction(s) to get started.

“Anime,” not surprisingly, is from the French. Japanese picks up
loanwords like nobody’s business. The Japanese adopted it to refer to
animated TV series, video series (OAV “original animation video” is a
acronym you’ll see) and feature films.

The sheer volume of anime being produced will prevent you from ever
knowing all the characters. More than half of our (extensive) video
collection is anime, and we’ve barely scratched the surface.

> Personally, I’m not very interested in cutesy Power Puff Girls or
> strange little Pokemon critters, but I’ve seen some books/comics at
> our local bookstore in the anime section that have illos that looked
> more to my taste – a more realistic style of illustration, rather that
> bizarre, juvenile or distorted body types.

There is a great deal of variation in character designs and art styles.
Sometimes “chibi” (cute) character designs belie a much darker and
sophisticated story than you would expect. The original Japanese
version of “Sailor Moon” is a lot rougher than any American cartoon
directed at 12-year-olds would be (and the Americanized DiC version
ended up being).

While it is generally true that most anime is based on popular manga
(comic books) some anime features and series are based on video games
and some are original stories. “Vision of Escaflowne” was first a TV
series and “Tenchi Muyo” first appeared as an OAV; the manga followed.

A great deal of anime features teenagers as main characters in “coming
of age” stories. Not all, mind you, but it’s the most common formula.

Oh, a bit on terminology and classification:
Manga publishers break things down into market segments, and that’s how
manga is classified (not by genre). “Shounen manga” is manga marketed
to (teenage) boys. “Shoujo manga” is marketed to (teenage) girls. Those
are the largest categories, but there are more.

Niche markets sometimes do include genre. Pornographic comics for men
are “Ecchi manga” or “eromanga” and homoerotic comics for men are “gay
manga.” Male/male homoerotic comics for women and girls are “boys love
manga.” Go fig…

This can all get a bit confusing. Studio Clamp’s stylish, violent,
drenched in blood “X/1999” is shoujo manga because it appeared
originally in a shoujo manga magazine. Rumiko Takahashi’s romance and
relationship oriented martial arts farce is shounen manga because it
appeared in a shounen manga magazine.

Anime doesn’t have these distinctions, particularly televised anime.
All TV screens are the same.

> BTW, does “A Distant Soil” fall into this category, or is that just a
> fantasy comic?

ADS is very definitely a fantasy comic; it’s not Japanese, so it’s not
manga, and it’s a comic book so it’s not anime.

> So tell me, where should a total anime neo start?

You could start with the titles on AnimeOnDVD’s essential collection
list
http://www.animeondvd.com/discdata/essential/index.php
Not that I agree with all of their recommendations. I hated “Record of
Lodoss War” (6 1/2 hours of my life wasted, and not well). Don’t watch
“Excel Saga” until you’ve watched a lot of anime. It’s incredibly dense
“aniparo” (anime parody) and without a good grounding in anime, manga
and Japanese culture you’ll lose most of it. AnimeOnDVD is an excellent
resource, and I 90% trust the team’s reviews.

The works of Hayao Miyazaki are modern classics
http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/

Osamu Tezuka is probably the biggest name ever in anime and manga.
You’ll recognize some of his work. You’ve seen it.
http://en.tezuka.co.jp/

Rumiko Takashi is “The Princess of Manga”. Her “Ranma 1/2,” “Inu
Yasha,” “Maison Ikoku” and “Lum” (“Urusei Yatsura” or “Those Annoying
Aliens”) are incredibly popular. Mind you, I never liked “Maison
Ikoku.” I adore the rest.
http://furinkan.com/takahashi/

Buy a copy of “The Anime Companion” and “Anime Essentials” by Gilles
Poitras
http://www.koyagi.com/index.html
Trust me. “The Anime Companion” is subtitled “What’s Japanese in
Japanese Animation” and it’s a great supporting work.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 724 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

In a message dated 7/8/2004 7:31:22 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> >Tina’s not on ICG-D.
>
> ‘k, it’s just as a list moderator myself I can’t in good conscience
> respond to the post on this list.

Andy,
E-mail Tina directly and cc it to the ICG-D if you think others would be
interested.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 725 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

On Jul 8, 2004, at 7:43 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> And some of us did anime stuff “in the day” 15-20 years ago (when it
> was
> still going by the un-PC label of “Japanimation”), but have NO idea
> what’s
> current now.

What’s current? If you like dubbed versions, there is a lot on TV. I’ll
mark (*) the ones I particularly like. Unmarked indicates stuff I
have’t seen, or stuff that I don’t care about. There are no real
stinkers I’ve seen in this list.

Check out the following Cartoon Network websites:
http://www.toonami.com/
http://www.adultswim.com/

Toonami is showing
Dragonball GT
Gundam Seed
YuYu Hakusho *

The Adult Swim track includes
Big O
Blue Gender
Case Closed
Cowboy Bebop *
FLCL
InuYasha *
Kikaider
Lupin the 3rd * (a decades-old classic)
Reign: The Comquerer
Trigun *
Witch Hunter Robin
Wolf’s Rain

G4/TechTV runs a bunch of stuff in its “Anime Unleashed” track
http://www.g4techtv.com/show.aspx?show_key=44
including
Banner of the Stars *
Betterman
Crest of the Stars *
Dual
Geneshaft
Last Exile

STARZ! Action runs some anime, particularly on Saturdays.
http://www.starz.com/se/action/index.html

This is by no means a comprehensive listing of anime currently running
on TV here.

And, of course, there’s DVD. If you prefer subtitles to dubs, buy your
anime on DVD instead of watching it on cable. My favorite retailer is
probably The Right Stuf, Inc. in Des Moines.
http://www.rightstuf.com/


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 726 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/9/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Have caught some InuYasha, and liked it. Cowboy Bebop didn’t make sense to
me, but maybe it is because I haven’t watched it from the beginning…?

Am a HUGE Lupin III fan from ‘way back…heading over to the website to see
when those are showing. 🙂 (One of the big pluses of Lupin III is the
jazz soundtrack music, LOL!)

–Karen

At 07:30 PM 7/9/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>What’s current? If you like dubbed versions, there is a lot on TV. I’ll
>mark (*) the ones I particularly like. Unmarked indicates stuff I
>have’t seen, or stuff that I don’t care about. There are no real
>stinkers I’ve seen in this list.

 

Group: runacc Message: 727 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Thanks, Nora. Although I am personally interested in finding out more about anime/manga, it also seems to me that if “we” (non-anime- costume fans) start showing up at anime cons and touting “our” cons, but obviously not having a clue about what’s going on, we aren’t likely to make the connections with these (mostly) young people that we want to. Instead, given that many of them are in the adolescent mindset already, we are likely to come across as condescending old farts.

A lot of what they are doing is really great, but there’s also a lot that looks really embarrassing – at the anime con I mentioned, there were some truly great costumes, but there were also far too many pudgy (or just plain fat) kids in poorly made and inappropriate-to-body-type outfits. “But I want to dress like my favorite character.” Reminded me of early (well, early for me – we only started going to cons about 25 years ago) con costuming, except for the generous admixture of superior costumes, which were less often seen back then. At least some of these kids clearly already have the right mindset regarding re-creation, in terms of trying for perfection.

I’d much prefer to be able to say “Oh, that’s a great “whatever” costume” than “that’s a great costume – what is it?”

Tina (who always wants to “know” – should have been named Rikki Tikki Tavvi)

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

I think it’s fairly relevant here because we keep saying we have to get the
anime people interested in CCs and a number of us don’t have a clue where to
start. While we might have an interest in anime, we’ve never been to one of
their cons, and aren’t sure how to approach this “new” type of fandom. I’d
say we’re asking for how to get started because we really want to hook up
with the anime fans on their own turf.

Nora

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 728 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

That would include me. Probably the only time I was ahead of the curve. I
was watching various videos with an informal group back in the mid-’80s.

My tastes ran (and still do, when I look for it) to SF stories, often giant
robot stuff. The storytelling is a bit different now in that genre, and I
might not find it as interesting.
I’ve noticed that when I have collected videos (I have maybe a dozen titles
or so), I prefer one-shots rather than a TV series. Don’t know why,
precisely. Guess I can stand a story just for so long, where anime is
concerned. I’m presently converting those old tapes to DVD. Things like
“Iczer 1”, “Madox-01”, “Warriors of the Wind” (aka Nausicca in the Valley of
the Wind), “Laputa”, GAll Force, etc. Another of my favorites is “Black
Magic M-66”. Derivative, but good stuff. And the Bubble Gum Crisis
(armored babes meet “Bladerunner”) first 2 or 3 videos are pretty good.

I’d like to give a series or two a try again. Some of the concepts seem
pretty interesting. I want to check out “Last Exile” because it looks like
Miyazaki’s stuff. More recently, we’ve seen the last two Miyazakis
“Princess Mononoke” and “Spirited Away”. I also have “Ghost In the Shell”
and look forwared to the RV series coming soon.

We’re pretty much getting a mindset to attend the conventions in Iowa (maybe
CC24 and 25 should do a joint presentation?) and Chicago in the next couple
of years.

A few questions, please, Andy:

Our friends the Morrises say that you can just about go in any costume and
pretty much fit in at one of these things — that the kids just think you’re
doing something they haven’t seen. Would it be better to “walk the walk”
and do the “When in Rome” thing?

What is the hot anime genre presently?

Is there a prevalence of a particular tv show/video that a lot of people are
costuming from?

All of us on this list are “mature costumers”. If anyone has seen any of
these anime, then they know that the popular characters are young and thin
(as Karen mentioned). Preferring to costume to body-type, then, becomes
more problematic. Do you have any thoughts on what shows that have good
designs that we could wear?

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

> And some of us did anime stuff “in the day” 15-20 years ago (when it was
> still going by the un-PC label of “Japanimation”), but have NO idea what’s
> current now.
>
> –Karen
>
> At 08:51 PM 7/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> >I think it’s fairly relevant here because we keep saying we have to get
the
> >anime people interested in CCs and a number of us don’t have a clue where
to
> >start. While we might have an interest in anime, we’ve never been to one
of
> >their cons, and aren’t sure how to approach this “new” type of fandom.
I’d
> >say we’re asking for how to get started because we really want to hook up
> >with the anime fans on their own turf.
> >
> >Nora
> >—– Original Message —–
> >From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> > > ‘k, it’s just as a list moderator myself I can’t in good conscience
> > > respond to the post on this list.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 729 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

At 07:44 AM 7/10/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>A lot of what they are doing is really great, but there’s also a lot that
>looks really embarrassing – at the anime con I mentioned, there were some
>truly great costumes, but there were also far too many pudgy (or just
>plain fat) kids in poorly made and inappropriate-to-body-type
>outfits. “But I want to dress like my favorite character.”

As was discussed months ago on the ICG-D (or maybe it was f-costume) list,
the motivation behind anime costuming is different from the motivation
behind S/F costuming.

The point of cosplay is to dress as your favorite character and re-enact
scenes from your favorite anime–awards are secondary or irrelevant, and so
is your actual physical resemblance to the character. So the whole
“costuming to body type” thing we do doesn’t necessarily apply in their
playground.

>Reminded me of early (well, early for me – we only started going to cons
>about 25 years ago) con costuming, except for the generous admixture of
>superior costumes, which were less often seen back then. At least some of
>these kids clearly already have the right mindset regarding re-creation,
>in terms of trying for perfection.

As in the early days of S/F costuming, best to find something positive
about every costume you see and compliment that vs. trying to lecture about
costuming to body type, especially on their home turf. At least they’re
interested in costume to begin with!

We also have to take into consideration that there are more large /
overweight kids today than there were 20 years ago (and even 20-30 years
ago, there were more “odd” body types in fandom than in the Real World,
with the possible exception of Southern California).

>I’d much prefer to be able to say “Oh, that’s a great “whatever” costume”
>than “that’s a great costume – what is it?”

Me, too, but there’s SO MUCH stuff out there that it’s nearly impossible to
know everything, not only in anime, but in S/F media recreations as well.
(I judged a Toronto Trek masquerade in the 90’s where somebody did an
obscure “Doctor Who” villain–I’d have been lost if they hadn’t supplied
photos of the original.

Recently, Marty Gear was a workmanship judge for a local Baltimore anime
convention. The participants loved it that their workmanship was being
recognized and awarded, and he even got a nice mention in one of the anime
magazines covering the convention.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 730 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Tina –

You might try going up to them and saying “I love your costume. Please tell
me about your character”. Most enthusiasts will be only to happy to
explain. There may be a few who won’t respond, but my experience has been
that most are polite and quite willing to share the “gospel”. We did a show
at one of the anime cons here, and took the opportunity to attend some of
the costuming panels and invite those present to CC22. We explained that we
welcomed anyone who was interested in doing costumes, and that many people
who attended might not have had an opportunity to see cosplay before. The
folks we talked to seemed pleased that their work was appreciated and that
people outside their interest group had made an effort to contact them. I
don’t know that we got any attendees, but we certainly extended the hand.

One thing that might deter some kids from attending a CC is the cost. As
with the rest of us, one can only afford to attend so many conventions and I
suspect that their funds would mainly go to anime cons. I do think we should
keep trying though because a true costume lover will want to try other types
of things as well and we may pick them up down the road a bit.

Trudy

>From: “Christine Connell” <connell-t1@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
>Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:44:11 -0400
>
>Thanks, Nora. Although I am personally interested in finding out more
>about anime/manga, it also seems to me that if “we” (non-anime- costume
>fans) start showing up at anime cons and touting “our” cons, but obviously
>not having a clue about what’s going on, we aren’t likely to make the
>connections with these (mostly) young people that we want to. Instead,
>given that many of them are in the adolescent mindset already, we are
>likely to come across as condescending old farts.
>
>A lot of what they are doing is really great, but there’s also a lot that
>looks really embarrassing – at the anime con I mentioned, there were some
>truly great costumes, but there were also far too many pudgy (or just plain
>fat) kids in poorly made and inappropriate-to-body-type outfits. “But I
>want to dress like my favorite character.” Reminded me of early (well,
>early for me – we only started going to cons about 25 years ago) con
>costuming, except for the generous admixture of superior costumes, which
>were less often seen back then. At least some of these kids clearly
>already have the right mindset regarding re-creation, in terms of trying
>for perfection.
>
>I’d much prefer to be able to say “Oh, that’s a great “whatever” costume”
>than “that’s a great costume – what is it?”
>
>Tina (who always wants to “know” – should have been named Rikki Tikki
>Tavvi)
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
>
>
> I think it’s fairly relevant here because we keep saying we have to get
>the
> anime people interested in CCs and a number of us don’t have a clue
>where to
> start. While we might have an interest in anime, we’ve never been to one
>of
> their cons, and aren’t sure how to approach this “new” type of fandom.
>I’d
> say we’re asking for how to get started because we really want to hook
>up
> with the anime fans on their own turf.
>
> Nora
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 731 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I’m presently converting those old tapes to DVD. Things like
> “Iczer 1”, “Madox-01”, “Warriors of the Wind” (aka Nausicca in the Valley of
> the Wind), “Laputa”, GAll Force, etc. Another of my favorites is “Black
> Magic M-66”. Derivative, but good stuff. And the Bubble Gum Crisis
> (armored babes meet “Bladerunner”) first 2 or 3 videos are pretty good.

Disney (through the efforts of John Lasseter at Pixar) has been
releasing new transfers of Miyazaki on DVD. “Laputa” (titled here
“Castle in the Sky”) is available on DVD, in a beautiful transfer.
“Warriors of the Wind” was a horible edit (21 minutes lost); “Nausicaa
in the Valley of the Wind” is due for DVD release in its original form
pretty soon. Don’t transfer your tapes, just spend the bucks and get the
DVDs.

“Bubblegum Crisis” was one of the first anime series (TV or OVA)
released on DVD.

> Our friends the Morrises say that you can just about go in any costume and
> pretty much fit in at one of these things — that the kids just think you’re
> doing something they haven’t seen. Would it be better to “walk the walk”
> and do the “When in Rome” thing?

Well…

Yes. If you walk in wearing an original costume, folks will just assume
that it’s something they haven’t seen. Fine for the halls, not for the
masquerade, though.

There’s also the option of traditional fan-wear for your first outing.

> What is the hot anime genre presently?

There isn’t one, really.

> Is there a prevalence of a particular tv show/video that a lot of people are
> costuming from?

Trigun has captured a lot of peoples fancies, but that’s a few years old.

> All of us on this list are “mature costumers”. If anyone has seen any of
> these anime, then they know that the popular characters are young and thin
> (as Karen mentioned). Preferring to costume to body-type, then, becomes
> more problematic. Do you have any thoughts on what shows that have good
> designs that we could wear?

Main characters are often young and thin. Supporting characters run the
gamut.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 732 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

We are currently getting the Anime Channel on our “On Demand” service with
the cable (when it works). We’re watching a lot of stuff, but unfortunately
much of it is mid series. Still fun though. I love Excel Saga, although I
wasn’t sure I was going to at first. I still think that Menchi is a cat,
though. I don’t care if they call her a dog. When we buy the DVDs, we
mostly get movies rather than series, but someone gave us a couple of Excels
and now we have to keep going.

Trudy

>From: Andrew T Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Anime Expo Masquerade Winners
>Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 19:30:39 -0700
>
>On Jul 8, 2004, at 7:43 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > And some of us did anime stuff “in the day” 15-20 years ago (when it
> > was
> > still going by the un-PC label of “Japanimation”), but have NO idea
> > what’s
> > current now.
>
>What’s current? If you like dubbed versions, there is a lot on TV. I’ll
>mark (*) the ones I particularly like. Unmarked indicates stuff I
>have’t seen, or stuff that I don’t care about. There are no real
>stinkers I’ve seen in this list.
>
>Check out the following Cartoon Network websites:
>http://www.toonami.com/
>http://www.adultswim.com/
>
>Toonami is showing
> Dragonball GT
> Gundam Seed
> YuYu Hakusho *
>
>The Adult Swim track includes
> Big O
> Blue Gender
> Case Closed
> Cowboy Bebop *
> FLCL
> InuYasha *
> Kikaider
> Lupin the 3rd * (a decades-old classic)
> Reign: The Comquerer
> Trigun *
> Witch Hunter Robin
> Wolf’s Rain
>
>G4/TechTV runs a bunch of stuff in its “Anime Unleashed” track
>http://www.g4techtv.com/show.aspx?show_key=44
>including
> Banner of the Stars *
> Betterman
> Crest of the Stars *
> Dual
> Geneshaft
> Last Exile
>
>STARZ! Action runs some anime, particularly on Saturdays.
>http://www.starz.com/se/action/index.html
>
>This is by no means a comprehensive listing of anime currently running
>on TV here.
>
>And, of course, there’s DVD. If you prefer subtitles to dubs, buy your
>anime on DVD instead of watching it on cable. My favorite retailer is
>probably The Right Stuf, Inc. in Des Moines.
>http://www.rightstuf.com/
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
>”Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
> — Donna Barr
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 733 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Many of us here started with media re-creation costumes (one of the first
two costumes I made was a Classic STAR TREK uniform, LOL!).

I can’t tell you what switch gets thrown in someone’s head to make them
want to try making their own original stuff, but it happens. (I always
bounced back and forth between original and re-creation, and so did many of
my friends, when we were in our late teens and early 20’s.) We can only
hope that some of the anime costumers will do the same once they are
exposed to other forms of costuming.

–Karen

At 03:38 PM 7/10/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>I do think we should
>keep trying though because a true costume lover will want to try other types
>of things as well and we may pick them up down the road a bit.
>
>Trudy

 

Group: runacc Message: 734 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/10/2004
Subject: Re: Anime Primer (was Re: Anime Expo Masquerade Winners

Thanks, Andy.
Turns out we have the “Anime Companion”; dug it out and I’ll be cracking it
tomorrow.
It also amused me that some of your recomendations were things I’ve seen
from 15 years ago; are these considered ‘classics’ then?
We stopped by a local comic shop today that we haven’t been in for a while
and they’ve really expanded their manga, etc. They also sponsor a yearly
Otaku night at a local theatre so we’ll try to get to that. We explained
that we’re trying to hook back up with the anime community & cosplayers &
he’s offered to post flyers, etc. for us once they get moved to their new
space (this weekend as it turns out). He agreed that the cosplay community
here is small but apparently he sees most of them.
So, our first steps; we’ll let you know where it leads. Any further hints
will, of course, be welcome.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> The works of Hayao Miyazaki are modern classics
> http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/
>
> Osamu Tezuka is probably the biggest name ever in anime and manga.
> You’ll recognize some of his work. You’ve seen it.
> http://en.tezuka.co.jp/
>
> Rumiko Takashi is “The Princess of Manga”. Her “Ranma 1/2,” “Inu
> Yasha,” “Maison Ikoku” and “Lum” (“Urusei Yatsura” or “Those Annoying
> Aliens”) are incredibly popular. Mind you, I never liked “Maison
> Ikoku.” I adore the rest.
> http://furinkan.com/takahashi/
>
> Buy a copy of “The Anime Companion” and “Anime Essentials” by Gilles
> Poitras
> http://www.koyagi.com/index.html
> Trust me. “The Anime Companion” is subtitled “What’s Japanese in
> Japanese Animation” and it’s a great supporting work.

 

Group: runacc Message: 735 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Yeah, thanks, Andy. We got our answers much more succintly here from you
than the meandering that would have immediately occured on the D list.

As usual, when we get a wild hair, we immediately like to do some research,
as Nora described previously. In addition, I sent out a few exploratory
e-mails to three anime cons expressing our interest in promoting CC25 and
doing some volunteer programming. We’ll see how that goes.

In the meantime, I came across the rather active Anime Central (Chicago, for
those of you not familar with it) forum Apparently, the con keeps in
contact with their attendees this way. Seems to be effective.

Anyway, I decided to do a little nosing around and immediately discovered
they have a whole board for Masquerade and Cosplay discussions.

http://www.acen.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4

It was a good opportunity to “eavesdrop” and see what kinds of things they
were talking about. Not too surprisingly, some of the subjects parallel our
own topics on the lists. The participants are no doubt represent only a
small portion of the whole, as far as the cosplayers are concerned. Yet,
you can certainly tell the writers are young adults or proto-adults.

A few choice threads I am copyng here are instructive for our group’s
discussion and what to expect if we go to one of these:

For one thing, apparently they have what passes for a masquerade and a
seperate competition for the skits. The skit times have “strict” limits.
There were also other issues discussed, including entrants flaunting those
rules. In particular, there was a character called Vash that stripped. The
“Naked Lady” syndrome seems to have raised it’s head (only this time, it was
a guy).

http://www.acen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=3913

At a media con, there’s a greater danger of a lot of people doing the same
character for hall (and competition costumes). You’d think with all that’s
out there, there’d be more originality, but apparently not. Probably
indicative of the limited resources of the participants. So, in this
thread, they’re predicting what will be hot as a costume for next year…

http://www.acen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4431

These next threads were of particular interest because they reveal more of
how these costumers think:

New hallway costume rules. This apparently caused quite an uproar. It
seems that this con has gotten so big –they were prediciting perhaps 800
attendees(!) — that the con staff made new rules that could seriously limt
the size and scope of many more elaborate costumes. The biggest issue was
the ‘ 6″ Rule’. The con is getting so popular and the hotel has expressed
concrns that the staff felt they had to act. Of course, how easy it was to
pollce this, I’m not sure….

http://www.acen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2690

Another syndrome appeared in recent memory — the Adrian Butterfield
effect. It seems some people were “cosplaying” Nazis…..

http://www.acen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4378

Finally, this seems to shed a bit more light on the whole question I posed
to Andy about “When in Rome”. We were a bit disturbed by some of the
opinions expressed on this one regarding going to an anime con in something
not anime related…

http://www.acen.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2564

Food for thought.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 736 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Hey, Bruce & Nora, thanks for the very helpful links.

At 12:19 AM 7/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>So, in this thread, they’re predicting what will be hot as a costume for
>next year…

I think it’s really sad that most of their members’ exposure to anime comes
from Cartoon Network and nothing else. Very limited pool of shows to draw
upon, IMHO, especially with the wealth of DVDs out there today. Can’t
afford to buy ’em? Many rental places now have very respectable anime
sections.

Some of the “classics”:

From the 60’s:
Astro Boy (aka Tetsuan Atom–updated version airing on network TV on
Saturday mornings)
8th Man (aka Tobor the 8th Man–I think an updated version just got remade)
Marine Boy
Prince Planet
Amazing Three (aka Wonder Three)
Kimba, the White Lion (aka Jungle Emperor Leo)

From the 70’s:
StarBlazers (aka Space Cruiser Yamato)
Battle for the Planets (aka Gatchaman–far more violence in its original form)
Lupin the 3rd (aka Lupin III–very adult adventures of a James Bond/Jewel
thief type character)
Captain Harlock (aka Cosmic Corsair Captain Harlock)
Starzinger (my memory is hazy on the Americanized name, but was packaged
with Voltron and other shows as an Adventure 5-pack)
Galaxy Express 999 (space-going train)
Queen of 1000 Years
(Harlock, GE 999, and Queen of 1000 Years all take place in the same
universe, so you’d see some characters on all 3 shows. Also Queen Emeraldis.)

From the 80’s
Robotech (combining the three shows Macross, Southern Cross, and Orguss–I
never saw the Orguss phase)
Dirty Pair (girls in skimpy costumes with big guns and explosives)
Bubblegum Crisis
Gundam
Akira (saw it and didn’t like it, but it had a HUGE following)

I know I’m forgetting stuff. I used to live, eat, and breathe this stuff,
and in 1990 it just stopped for me when I moved to the East Coast. Now
trying so hard to collect my favorites (Astro Boy just celebrated his 40th
anniversary!) that there’s no time to see the new stuff, except the odds
and ends I catch on Cartoon Channel and Sci-Fi Channel (finally got to see
Vampire Hunter D).

The one movie I always wanted to see and didn’t was “Crusher Joe,” who was
billed as a Han Solo / space mercenary sort of character (definitely aimed
at an adult audience).

>The biggest issue was the ‘ 6″ Rule’.

There’s going to be a lotta unhappy Giant Robots and Winged characters, LOL!

>Another syndrome appeared in recent memory — the Adrian Butterfield
>effect. It seems some people were “cosplaying” Nazis…..

This has been an ongoing issue for the last 30 years (and it didn’t start
with Adrian). I have photos from the early 70’s of friends who wore Nazi
uniforms to a TREK convention, entered the masquerade, and billed
themselves as being from the STAR TREK episode “Patterns of Force.” The
photos show them menacing another masquerade entrant, who was a belly
dancer from the episode with Jack the Ripper. I also had friends (with real
Tommy guns!) who dressed as characters from “A Piece of the Action.”

If we start deciding some costumes are acceptable and some are not, where
do we draw the line?
Aside from the obvious nudity in pubic areas of the hotel and live steel /
real weapons.

>Finally, this seems to shed a bit more light on the whole question I posed
>to Andy about “When in Rome”. We were a bit disturbed by some of the
>opinions expressed on this one regarding going to an anime con in something
>not anime related…

Well *sigh* it IS an ANIME con. I wish I wish I still fit into some of my
old costumes from the 80’s. But they are all long gone / sold off to
collectors.

If you go to the San Diego Comic-Con and enter original costumes in the
masquerade, don’t expect to win anything (unless you are Brinke Stephens
and do a really cool dance routine, LOL!).

We went to Toronto Trek in the mid-90’s and were *thrilled* to meet two of
the actors from the vampire cop show, FOREVER KNIGHT (shot locally in
Toronto). Other attendees were grousing because they “weren’t from STAR
TREK, so they don’t belong here.” And the Toronto Trek masquerade audience
also had trouble coping with non-media costumes (although there was more
than just Trek entered–we also saw very good entries from Doctor Who and
Babylon 5, among others).

So, we need to cut the anime folk some slack here. It *is* their territory.
If I were going to an anime con, I’d dig out my “Robot Power” Astro Boy
t-shirt, or try to find something simple to make to fit in. Many of the
series (Lupin III) feature 20th-century clothes, and many of the background
characters in other series are wearing traditional ethnic garments (here’s
the excuse to break out that Folkwear pattern and make a kimono, or
cheongsam, or hapi / haori). There are non-perfect / non-slender
characters–you just have to deal with being the older advisor or the comic
sidekick or whatever. Some friends once had a “Starzinger” costume group in
planning (science fiction themed retelling of “The Monkey King,” as many of
us saw in the 60’s as “Alakazam the Great”). Starzinger is the typical
slender brunette hero guy, and the Princess he is guarding looks like
Barbie (all blonde and pink). I was going to make Princess’ matronly
advisor, who was essentially wearing white bellbottoms, a white lab coat,
and funky green earrings. Not a stretch, but an easy “gateway” costume and
a way to beef up the group.

Maybe all of us need to rent a few videos and see what’s out there. This
can be like the SCA, where you can be a peasant and still go to the events
without much capital outlay.

But, of course, I’ve loved this genre since I was 9 or 10 years old and
just haven’t kept up with it in the last decade, so it’s not a stretch to
eturn to my roots.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 737 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

> Hey, Bruce & Nora, thanks for the very helpful links.

No problemo. 🙂

>
> I think it’s really sad that most of their members’ exposure to anime
comes
> from Cartoon Network and nothing else. Very limited pool of shows to draw
> upon, IMHO, especially with the wealth of DVDs out there today. Can’t
> afford to buy ’em? Many rental places now have very respectable anime
> sections.

Yeah, although when we triedd to find some, they were pretty hard ot come
by. There are some Asian stores in our area, but they are stocking Chinese
videos, not Japanese.

>
> From the 80’s

> Akira (saw it and didn’t like it, but it had a HUGE following)

Yeah, it was neat to look at, but I thought it was long. Apparently fans
don’t think so. (shrug)

(finally got to see Vampire Hunter D).

Oh, yeah! How could I forget that one! Yeah, that’s one of our favorites,
and we just recently rented the sequel. Not bad.
>
> The one movie I always wanted to see and didn’t was “Crusher Joe,” who was
> billed as a Han Solo / space mercenary sort of character (definitely aimed
> at an adult audience).

Yeah, more or less.

>
> >The biggest issue was the ‘ 6″ Rule’.
>
> There’s going to be a lotta unhappy Giant Robots and Winged characters,
LOL!

So I hear. Since the con happened so recently, I’m not sure what the
fallout was, but I notieced in the photos there were no mecha costumes. Too
bad, since I’d really like to see those up close.
>
> >Another syndrome appeared in recent memory — the Adrian Butterfield
> >effect. It seems some people were “cosplaying” Nazis…..
>
> This has been an ongoing issue for the last 30 years (and it didn’t start
> with Adrian). I have photos from the early 70’s of friends who wore Nazi
> uniforms to a TREK convention, entered the masquerade, and billed
> themselves as being from the STAR TREK episode “Patterns of Force.” The
> photos show them menacing another masquerade entrant, who was a belly
> dancer from the episode with Jack the Ripper. I also had friends (with
real
> Tommy guns!) who dressed as characters from “A Piece of the Action.”

Ah. Interesting. Didn’t know that, but not surprising, I suppose.

>
> If we start deciding some costumes are acceptable and some are not, where
> do we draw the line?
> Aside from the obvious nudity in pubic areas of the hotel and live steel /
> real weapons.

Well, like they said, it was a matter of the crowds. With 8000 (not 800, as
I erroneously posted LATE last night), I can see the problems. With a high
factor of people costuming with bits that extend off their bodies and being
a bit over-enthusiastic/oblivious/lacking a whole lot of common sense,
someone’s bound to get an eye poked out. There was one story about someone
in Pocky cardboard box costume (apparently, there’s at least one every year,
by the sound of it) that took out people, tables and whatever else they
didn’t see with their limited vision.

The arguement was made to move the con, but the counter arguement was that
it would require moving the con downtown and would cost more as a result.
The spin by one of the staffers was proposing the costumers should accept
the rule as a “challenge”, rather than a limitation.

>
> >Finally, this seems to shed a bit more light on the whole question I
posed
> >to Andy about “When in Rome”. We were a bit disturbed by some of the
> >opinions expressed on this one regarding going to an anime con in
something
> >not anime related…
>
> Well *sigh* it IS an ANIME con. I wish I wish I still fit into some of my
> old costumes from the 80’s. But they are all long gone / sold off to
> collectors.
>
> If you go to the San Diego Comic-Con and enter original costumes in the
> masquerade, don’t expect to win anything (unless you are Brinke Stephens
> and do a really cool dance routine, LOL!).

Actually, if you do someting original within the context of a media
character, you can be awarded. A young female did some sort of backless
Amidala number and won 2 – 3 prizes. Of course, it didn’t hurt that she was
pretty….

>
> So, we need to cut the anime folk some slack here. It *is* their
territory.
> If I were going to an anime con, I’d dig out my “Robot Power” Astro Boy
> t-shirt, or try to find something simple to make to fit in. Many of the
> series (Lupin III) feature 20th-century clothes, and many of the
background
> characters in other series are wearing traditional ethnic garments (here’s
> the excuse to break out that Folkwear pattern and make a kimono, or
> cheongsam, or hapi / haori). There are non-perfect / non-slender
> characters–you just have to deal with being the older advisor or the
comic
> sidekick or whatever.

Yeah, that appears to be the case. I think the novelty alone of a older
costumer playing on their turf with a recognizable costume is going to get
you some props, given the demographics of at least this con.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 738 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Sorry that the last post was so long, and kinda off topic for runacc. As
one of the moderators on this list, I should know better.

“Starzinger’s” Americanized name was “Spaceketeers” (pronounced like
Mouseketeers or Musketeers), but we found it heinous and pronounced it, in
our best hillbilly accent, as “Space Keaters” (as in rhyming with heaters
or skeeters). Terrible name, interesting show.

Thanks to buying a whole lotta Anime albums in the 70’s, I know theme songs
from anime shows I never saw (such as “Cyborg 009”).

Speaking of Cyborg 009, the cyborgs appear to come in all shapes and sizes,
and wear simple red double-breasted uniforms with brass buttons that would
be easy to make. Just saw the DVD in my local Suncoast video store. That
would be an easy “entry level” hall costume, too.

>Yeah, although when we triedd to find some, they were pretty hard ot come
>by. There are some Asian stores in our area, but they are stocking Chinese
>videos, not Japanese.

I assume you’re having trouble finding rentals…? I think it was our local
Blockbuster that had an appeciable section. In San Jose, it was a large
hobby shop that first started carrying Anime videos for sale or rental.

Our local Suncoast store had a HUGE anime DVD section (plus manga books,
pocky candy, anime magazines, etc.) for sale.

>Re Vampire Hunter D] Oh, yeah! How could I forget that one! Yeah, that’s
>one of our favorites,
>and we just recently rented the sequel. Not bad.

Kathryn and Duane Elms had a gorgeous art book of costumes from the
show–would make great re-creation stuff.

>Ah. Interesting. Didn’t know that, but not surprising, I suppose.

It’s only fair to mention that the costumers in Nazi uniforms and gangster
stuff were avid gun collectors, military history buffs, and addictively
played board war games like “Risk” and “War In The East.” They also made
killer Imperial Uniforms from STAR WARS. One of them even bore a
more-than-passing resemblance to Grand Moff Tarkin. In the case of the
STAR WARS repros, the guns were modified replicas, not the real thing. 🙂

BTW, I quite understand the “no weapons” rule at most cons, having been at
the Los Angeles S/F convention where a Logan’s Run “sandman” was nearly
blown away by a SWAT team for drawing down on a “runner” with a
realistic-looking weapon. (This was on public streets surrounding an
airport-area hotel.) Convention staff got real anal about “peace-bonding”
or confiscating weaponry after that, including obviously balsa wood STAR
TREK pistol phasers. Part of this is the fault of S/F movies of the period
(notably STAR WARS) for using modified real guns (mauser, target pistols,
etc.) as props in their movies, so the fans faithfully copied them.

>Well, like they said, it was a matter of the crowds. With 8000 (not 800, as
>I erroneously posted LATE last night), I can see the problems. With a high
>factor of people costuming with bits that extend off their bodies and being
>a bit over-enthusiastic/oblivious/lacking a whole lot of common sense,
>someone’s bound to get an eye poked out. There was one story about someone
>in Pocky cardboard box costume (apparently, there’s at least one every year,
>by the sound of it) that took out people, tables and whatever else they
>didn’t see with their limited vision.

I’ve attended several conventions over 10,000 people, but I guess the
extensions off the body were not an issue in that era, as there were very
few costumes trying to do wings, etc. as hall costumes. The masquerade is
something else, and should not be restricted.

I think you may be right about the young, enthusiatic fans / lack of sense
issue. In may day, it was the Logan’s Run fans, who were typically under 21
and conducted “runs” in places where they were a danger to themselves and
the older fen (and mundanes!) they occasionally plowed over.

Sounds like they need a bigger venue, or areas where BIG costumes are
permitted or restricted (but not banned completely).

>Actually, if you do someting original within the context of a media
>character, you can be awarded. A young female did some sort of backless
>Amidala number and won 2 – 3 prizes. Of course, it didn’t hurt that she was
>pretty….

People did variants of Princess Leia in the 70’s and 80’s and competed them
(notably Carol Salemi’s dress and full circle cape with reflective CD’s all
over it made for ConStellation in 1983), so I think variants are acceptable
to S/F fans.

I made (but just wore in the halls) several uniform variants derived from
StarBlazers, including a female “Black Tiger” fighter pilot (females were
NEVER shown as fighter pilots on the series). These were recognizable as
being from that universe, and I got lots of photos taken by visiting
Japanese fans. Don’t know how this would go over 20 years later, or whether
it would be considered “inaccurate” by other fans.

>I think the novelty alone of a older
>costumer playing on their turf with a recognizable costume is going to get
>you some props, given the demographics of at least this con.

I wonder if older anime fans just don’t bother with costumes because of the
body type thing.
Heck, the guy who organized the first anime club in Los Angeles (Fred
Patton of LASFS) was probably in his 50’s when he did so (and was the
stereotypical “dumpy” male fannish body type, no offense intended).

Most anime seems intended for kids and teens. I know the adult Japanese
fans I talked to in the 80’s were amazed that people in their mid-20’s were
following Space Cruiser Yamato, Gatchaman, and Macross, which to them were
shows intended for a younger audience.

It’s not that I lost my love of anime as a middle-aged adult. I just don’t
have the corporate income to enable me to follow the conventions and buy
the latest and greatest on DVD to stay up with the genre. We’ve been
talking about trying to go to some of the local anime and S/F cons within a
day’s drive (maybe only for one day each), to try to connect with
Pittsburgh / Cleveland / Columbus fandom preparatory to bidding for CC-30.
Plus we have a very active local beading group (of which Denice Girardeau
and Susie Garcia are prominent members), and we’re going to see if their
club will organize a strong track of beading-related programming for us.

Guess I should bring a small photo album of my anime costume from the 70’s
and 80’s that I can show to younger fen if I ever go to an anime convention.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 739 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Astro Boy 40th

I could’ve sworn that I was younger that 18 when I first started watching Astro Boy! There wasn’t much of anything way back then that could have been considered SF, unless you count Duck Dodgers and Marvin the Martian.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick<mailto:castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
<snip>
I know I’m forgetting stuff. I used to live, eat, and breathe this stuff,
and in 1990 it just stopped for me when I moved to the East Coast. Now
trying so hard to collect my favorites (Astro Boy just celebrated his 40th
anniversary!) that there’s no time to see the new stuff, except the odds
and ends I catch on Cartoon Channel and Sci-Fi Channel (finally got to see
Vampire Hunter D).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 740 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 7/11/2004
Subject: Re: Astro Boy 40th

Tina–

CYE.

Anybody else who wants to discuss this, feel free to contact me off-list,
but we are getting ‘way off topic.

–Karen

At 07:18 PM 7/11/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>I could’ve sworn that I was younger that 18 when I first started watching
>Astro Boy! There wasn’t much of anything way back then that could have
>been considered SF, unless you count Duck Dodgers and Marvin the Martian.
>
>Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 741 From: Bruno Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers
Sorry if this rambles a bit, but there’s been so much to respond to while I
was in Vegas for a week, and I’m still recovering.

When I first attend the local Anime convention, I didn’t get an anime
costume finished, so I wore something I had which had an anime look to it
(military uniform, big cape). I had my picture taken more in that non-anime
costume than in the anime costumes that I have done since. Many people came
up and asked, “Are you from _______?” At first, I would reply, “No, it’s
just something I made up.” They would always get a puzzled look as if they
didn’t understand doing something original, then say, “well, it’s really
cool.” After a while, I got tired of explaining, so I’d just tell them that
whatever they guessed was correct. If they didn’t have a guess, I’d just
tell them someone else’s guess. There is so much anime that it’s hard to
know them all and there are strong similarities between many of them. If
they don’t recognize which anime your costume is from, they’ll assume it’s
something they haven’t seen before. Even if you just wear an anime t-shirt,
you’ll fit in at an anime convention, granted the median age demographic is
very low.

Body type and even gender is not an issue in cosplaying, as the point is to
be your character, regardless of what one looks like. I every manner of
size, shape and gender dressed as Sailor Moon. Crossplaying
(cross-dressing) is very popular particularly with young girls dressing as
their favorite male characters. I even know some girls who will only
cosplay male characters.

Asian and Asian-inspired traditional costumes are also popular at Anime
conventions, some even has special categories for them in the costume
contest. Many anime characters also wear plain street clothes. Many
conventions have cracked down on allowing anyone just wearing street clothes
to enter the costume contest.

Overall I don’t feel that CC will appeal to most cosplayers, as they cosplay
because it’s the in thing to do, not because they have an interest in
costuming. Also, even though costuming skills are somewhat universal, an
Anime/Asian specific track would be more more appealing to cosplayers than
general costuming classes. A panel on making kitty ears (seen in many
anime) would be much more enticing to most cosplayers than something more
generalized like Hats and Headdresses.

I have talked to members of the local cosplay club a lot about CC23. I even
crossposted the panel list from CC22 to the mailing list. The few people
that I have interested resulted from showing a CC video during lunch at a
sewing workshop that the group had. Cosplayers will to any anime convention
that the can convince their parents to send them to; however, convincing
them to attend a non-anime convention is an uphill battle.

I have convinced a number of local cosplayers to attend and enter the
Masquerade at MileHiCon which I run. Overall, they have enjoyed the
opportunity to talk with the judges in the Green Room and feel that the
judging is much fairer. I always hear them recommend MileHi to their
friends. The last couple of years, I have had nearly equal numbers of Anime
and SF entries.

There is a large amount of discontent with local cosplayers over the judging
system at the local anime con. Judges are always guests and are judged on a
10 point scale. The numbers are totaled for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd place, then
each judge gets a Judges Choice, there is also an Audience Favorite. There
have been years when logical choices have won and years when the winners
just make you wonder why. Also, many times, one or two entries will take
several awards each. The greatest discontent is when a group of cute kids
takes top honors and several judges choice. Judges are most likely to make
a selection for their choice of an entry which is from something which they
have worked on.

In most recent years, the popular costumes have been from Inu Yasha. A few
years ago, Sailor Moon was very popular. It is speculated that Sailor Moon
will make a comeback at this years con. The best source for pictures of
what’s hot in the cosplay world is to check the website of Kevin Lillard, “A
Fan’s View”. He travels to anime conventions around the world, nearly every
weekend of the year, photographing cosplayers and probably has the most
extensive photo archive of cosplayers in the world. I try to check the
major cons after they happen.

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 742 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

On Jul 11, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I assume you’re having trouble finding rentals…?

One word: Netflix

> It’s only fair to mention that the costumers in Nazi uniforms and
> gangster
> stuff were avid gun collectors, military history buffs, and addictively
> played board war games like “Risk” and “War In The East.” They also
> made
> killer Imperial Uniforms from STAR WARS. One of them even bore a
> more-than-passing resemblance to Grand Moff Tarkin. In the case of the
> STAR WARS repros, the guns were modified replicas, not the real thing.
> 🙂

There’s actually some precedent for Nazi uniforms in an anime/manga
masquerade. Osamu TEZUKA (of AstroBoy fame) did a manga series “Adolf:
The Half Aryan” which I can’t even begin to describe. It’s about
racism, Nazism, and the small underground Japanese pacifist movement
during World War II.

> I made (but just wore in the halls) several uniform variants derived
> from
> StarBlazers, including a female “Black Tiger” fighter pilot (females
> were
> NEVER shown as fighter pilots on the series). These were recognizable
> as
> being from that universe, and I got lots of photos taken by visiting
> Japanese fans. Don’t know how this would go over 20 years later, or
> whether
> it would be considered “inaccurate” by other fans.

Fanfic is a big thing in anime circles, so original designs derived
from popular works are generally also considered kosher.

> Most anime seems intended for kids and teens. I know the adult Japanese
> fans I talked to in the 80’s were amazed that people in their mid-20’s
> were
> following Space Cruiser Yamato, Gatchaman, and Macross, which to them
> were
> shows intended for a younger audience.

Strange aspect of Japanese culture, actually.

Part of it is that the anime in question is directed at teens and
younger. Not all, though. It’s perfectly fine to enjoy anime and manga,
but being a “fan” is something adults don’t do. If you don’t give up
being a fan, going to conventions and such, you’ll be branded an
“otaku” which **isn’t** a compliment. “Otaku” is Japanese for
“obsessive” (roughly) and puts you outside of mainstream society (a big
deal in Japan).


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 743 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

On Jul 11, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>> Akira (saw it and didn’t like it, but it had a HUGE following)
>
> Yeah, it was neat to look at, but I thought it was long. Apparently
> fans
> don’t think so. (shrug)

It’s actually not terribly coherent, either. Captivating, though…

The manga is an epic of 6 volumes.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 744 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

On Jul 10, 2004, at 11:31 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> From the 80’s
> Robotech (combining the three shows Macross, Southern Cross, and
> Orguss–I
> never saw the Orguss phase)

Super Dimesion Fortress Macross, Super Dimension Cavalry Southern Cross
and Genesis Climber Mospaeda, actually. Badly edited and rewritten to
create Robotech.

Got the restored edition of SDF Macross a year or two ago, and it was
really cool. Makes a lot more sense. Just got Mospaeda on disc, haven’t
started watching it yet.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 745 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 7/12/2004
Subject: The ugly AX report…
Chronicles of the “workmanship” judging disaster
http://forums.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=38702

And the whole Cosplay.com Anime Expo forum area for more…
http://forums.cosplay.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 746 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com>
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Lots of good info, there, Mike. On the surface, this doesn’t sound very
incouraging, but on the other hadn, it sounds like you made a few inroads.
We’ve stated all along that we would only expect about 10% to show interest,
but that’s still a potential sizable number of people.

From wht you’ve said, I think we could tailor panels to the interest of the
attendees. I’d bet a panel on traditional Japanese costume construction
might draw some people. I think one thing I’d probably wear there is one
or two of my hantens I wear regularly when the weather’s appropriate.

Andy’s comments about possible age discrimination are a bit disconcerting,
though…. What about the people who run the cons? They can’t be pups.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 747 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

There are older (non-teenage) people involved with Anime conventions and
Cosplaying. There are parents who attend with their kids and adults who are
there of their own interests. However, if you look through any of the
pictures at A Fan’s View http://www.afansview.com you will see that the
majority are very young. I know high school kids locally who go to cons on
their own, both locally and out of state.

I do not feel that overall, there would be any age discrimination from the
younger crowd if they felt that you were cool with what they were doing or
even participating. I’m sure that many of them have parents who do not
approve of what they are doing and to have another adult criticize them at a
con, I’m sure, would set them off.

Michael

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

>
> Andy’s comments about possible age discrimination are a bit disconcerting,
> though…. What about the people who run the cons? They can’t be pups.
>
> Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 748 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

I think that the best way to promote CC to Cosplayers or anyone who’s never
been is to show them the types of things that go on at CC, rather than to
just tell them. I’ve seen more interest generated by people seeing
masquerade videos from CC than from just talking about them. It would be
nice to have a CC promo video, showing clips of all different things at CC;
masquerades, contests, socials, people in the halls, different panels. I
think that showing it in conjunction with a panel discussing CC would be the
best means to attract and interest people who have never been to CC.

The big Anime conventions in the Midwest that people from here travel to are
ACEN (Anime Central) and Anime Iowa. ACEN was in May and I think Anime Iowa
is in August.

I also emailed Kevin Lillard who run A Fan’s View and probably has the most
extensive photo collection of cosplayers, and he has added CC23 to his list
of “Other Conventions of Interest”.

—– Original Message —–
> Lots of good info, there, Mike. On the surface, this doesn’t sound very
> incouraging, but on the other hadn, it sounds like you made a few inroads.
> We’ve stated all along that we would only expect about 10% to show
interest,
> but that’s still a potential sizable number of people.
>
> From wht you’ve said, I think we could tailor panels to the interest of
the
> attendees. I’d bet a panel on traditional Japanese costume construction
> might draw some people. I think one thing I’d probably wear there is
one
> or two of my hantens I wear regularly when the weather’s appropriate.

 

Group: runacc Message: 749 From: Bruno Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Challenges on Promotion
Ok! I’m on a roll. Getting caught back up on things after a week in Vegas.

Here are some of the challenges I have experienced promoting CC in a non-CC
familiar area (Denver, CO).

I started my big CC promotion push at the local media con StarFest in
mid-April. This was 2 weeks before the dates for CC next year. I made big
posters of the flyers and lots of flyers. I had many people look at the
flyer and say, “I’d love to go, but I can’t get the time off that soon. If
only I’d known sooner.” After a while I finally figured out that they
thought it was this year, in two weeks. Then I started telling people that
it was next year. I think that people who are not used to traveling to cons
or planning to attend a con more than a year out, just don’t grasp the
concept of doing so. I asked at work if I could put in for vacation for CC
next year and was told that it was too soon. Many people just don’t plan
things that far out. I feel that the best time to begin promoting CC
locally would be 6-9 months out. You can start earlier, but I would not put
a lot of effort into a big local push until 6-9 months out.

I’ve also had a number of people tell me that Salt Lake City (9 hours from
Denver) is too far to go for a con.

The biggest challenge to promoting CC23 in Denver is that next year, due to
the addition of Star Wars Celebration 3 in April, the local media con moved
it’s weekend to avoid conflicting with SWC3 and is now the same weekend at
CC23. I am having a very difficult time convincing people to skip the media
con for a year. It is the biggest convention in Denver at 3-5000 people.
Even though people complain every year about how the costume contest is run,
they still aren’t willing to give up seeing the media guests to try
something different for a year. This convention (StarFest) is also a big
draw for people from Salt Lake City, so it may even be a challenge to get
SLC local media fans to attend CC.

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 750 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/13/2004
Subject: Re: Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

Don’t be so sure of that. A BUNCH of people got major con-running experience while in their teens.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruno” <bruno@soulmasque.com<mailto:bruno@soulmasque.com>>
Subject: Re: [runacc] Looking into the minds of Cosplayers

What about the people who run the cons? They can’t be pups.

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 14 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 14 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 651 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 652 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 653 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 654 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 655 From: davedoering Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 656 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 657 From: davedoering Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: Big conventions
Group: runacc Message: 658 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/17/2004
Subject: CC26? at Westercon, 7/2/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 659 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)
Group: runacc Message: 660 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)
Group: runacc Message: 661 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)
Group: runacc Message: 662 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)
Group: runacc Message: 663 From: David Doering Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Challenges on Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 664 From: David Doering Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 665 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Archon Party Question
Group: runacc Message: 666 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 667 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 668 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 669 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)
Group: runacc Message: 670 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 671 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 672 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: More on promotion…just FYI
Group: runacc Message: 673 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 674 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: More on promotion…just FYI
Group: runacc Message: 675 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 676 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Challenges on Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 677 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 678 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…
Group: runacc Message: 679 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 680 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 681 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 682 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 683 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 684 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Group: runacc Message: 685 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/27/2004
Subject: Question for Charles & Dave
Group: runacc Message: 686 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/27/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 687 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 688 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…
Group: runacc Message: 689 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…
Group: runacc Message: 690 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Group: runacc Message: 691 From: David Doering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea
Group: runacc Message: 692 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for St. Louis
Group: runacc Message: 693 From: David Doering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up
Group: runacc Message: 694 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea
Group: runacc Message: 695 From: davedoering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea
Group: runacc Message: 696 From: David Doering Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 697 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 698 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 699 From: David Doering Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Group: runacc Message: 700 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 651 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: The Flyer
Back to the original discussion which was promotion of CCs via a joint flyer
(not promoting the Folio). Granted promoting the Folio can generate some
interest in CC (provided the CC is mentioned sufficiently in the Folio
materials) but that’s not my point.

Henry: Yeah, it’s pretty bare bones but it’s designed for insertion of
various information as the sites change, it could be used repeatedly with
very little change from year to year. I also wanted to get an idea out there
quickly and didn’t really have time to research everyone’s info. Given the
astounding lack of interest in it, I’m glad I didn’t put more effort into
it.

Andy: It’s very nice that you’re including everyone’s info on your flyers
(and pretty much the same idea) but my idea was to more evenly distribute
the responsibilty and cost of a multi-flyer to all CCs.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 652 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer

On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:28 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Andy: It’s very nice that you’re including everyone’s info on your
> flyers
> (and pretty much the same idea) but my idea was to more evenly
> distribute
> the responsibilty and cost of a multi-flyer to all CCs.

I’m not sure I get the cost issue. It cost me the same to print up my
flier with everybody’s dates and info as it does to print up an
“official” flier with everybody’s information on it.

Note: I’m not suggesting nobody use the general flier. I’m just saying
I don’t need to use the general flier.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 653 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer

Not so much cost as coverage; if everyone is using it then you’ll get
coverage at more venues without spending more. If every committee covers a
particular area with the general flyer then everyone gets national coverage
without having to send their individual flyers to every con. I expect we’d
all send our individual flyers to most of the biggies anyway with heavier
coverage in some areas.
But this way we’d know that we’d have some general coverage just about
everywhere.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] The Flyer

> On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:28 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Andy: It’s very nice that you’re including everyone’s info on your
> > flyers
> > (and pretty much the same idea) but my idea was to more evenly
> > distribute
> > the responsibilty and cost of a multi-flyer to all CCs.
>
> I’m not sure I get the cost issue. It cost me the same to print up my
> flier with everybody’s dates and info as it does to print up an
> “official” flier with everybody’s information on it.
>
> Note: I’m not suggesting nobody use the general flier. I’m just saying
> I don’t need to use the general flier.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> …remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 654 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
In my opinion, paying for flyers is just spent moeny for the common goal,
which is to promote CC’s, no matter where they are and if you are going or not.
After Duckon a few weeks ago, I gave the remaining flyers I had made to the
Inkpens, because they will be hitting another con before I do. Before I took them
to Duckon, I sent them to WisCon. If I had had Nora’s UnaFlyer, I would have
taken that, too.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 655 From: davedoering Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer
I think we need to ask ourselves who we want to draw in with the
flyer–those who’ve heard about us before or those who have not.

I think the draft would appeal more towards someone who has some idea
about coming to a Costume Con and just is trying to figure out WHEN
they might make it.

I think another draft might be heavy on WHAT a Costume Con is and WHY
they should come, with a small section at the bottom listing the
dates/locations of future cons.

Frankly, I am not sure which group is larger _at the venues where
these flyers will be_. (Which likely are SF/F cons but could also be
Royal Court events, RenFairs, Belly Dance Festivals, etc.)

Dave Doering

 

Group: runacc Message: 656 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: The Flyer

davedoering wrote:

> I think we need to ask ourselves who we want to draw in with the
> flyer–those who’ve heard about us before or those who have not.

‘k, it’s a big download, but…
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/CC26.Fliers.pdf
examples of all sorts of poster/flier content

also, our “resume” for hotels and orgs outside our normal sphere
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/CC26.Packet.pdf

some of you have seen these before.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 657 From: davedoering Date: 6/16/2004
Subject: Re: Big conventions

I am sorry, but Yahoo was abusing me during this earlier discussion
and would not let me post. So I want to add a few comments.

— Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> We’re talking pro-run vs. fan-run conventions here, which are two

VERY

> different animals.

Exactly. The point I wanted to make was that Comic-Con at some point
made a deliberate decision to go pro. The WorldCon made one to stay
fan-run. I am asking here if the Costume-Con mark holders have made a
decision either way–to keep Costume-Con as a fan-run only event or
if the opportunity came up in the future to possibly have a pro-run
version?

I think the oft-made comparison between Costume College and Costume-
Con is relevant here (although College is an all-volunteer event).

Costume College performs extremely well for its current venue and
audience. The College staff has made a conscious decision to limit
total memberships rather than seek a larger venue. I believe Darla
will correct me if I am wrong, but moving to a larger venue, allowing
greater attendance, would also entail increasing programming, greater
hotel expense, and more support services.

Particularly, the larger venue’s programming would be the biggest
hurdle, because finding competent instructors becomes increasingly
difficult. Also, supporting those instructors and classes behind the
scenes becomes much more elaborate.

For Costume-Con, however, we face the inverse problem. The smaller
our size, the fewer people we have to run the con, attend the panels,
and, most importantly, compete. I am thinking that 200 is just about
the bare minimum we can have and not overwork everyone or have shows
with just five or six entries. And, with just 200, we cannot afford a
large scale venue for more programming, better lighting/sound for the
masquerades, or heavily promote it because we can’t afford ad space,
tables at cons, air travel, etc.

So while Costume College has an upper-limit to keep it a great event,
Costume-Con has an under-limit, a minimum, attendance to work.

For that reason, we cannot simply have discrete committees working
independent of each other to create separate and distinct Costume-
Cons and expect CCs to move onward and upward.

Dave D.

 

Group: runacc Message: 658 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/17/2004
Subject: CC26? at Westercon, 7/2/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at Westercon


Friday July 2, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.

Notes:
Party night TBD, fliers, award ribbons



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 659 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

To get our definitions straight, when I say “pro run,” I mean a convention
is run as a Big Business deal and the $$$$$ generated goes into the pockets
of a handful of individuals. Examples: San Diego Comic-Con, Creation media
conventions, Chiller Theatre, and (I’m fairly sure) Dragoncon. The San
Diego Comic-Con is run under the aegis of a non-profit corporation, but I’m
sure there are some well-paid full-time staff positions involved for some
of the key players.

“Pro run” means “promoter” run, NOT “professionally” run. Even the smallest
fan-run convention can be run professionally (i.e., to a high set of
standards). Further, it has been my experience over the last 30 years that
most promoter-run conventions are about making the maximum about of income
for the promoter, NOT about providing a quality experience for the
attendees, who are usually treated like cattle.

More comments below:

At 02:51 AM 6/17/2004 +0000, you wrote:

>The point I wanted to make was that Comic-Con at some point
>made a deliberate decision to go pro. The WorldCon made one to stay
>fan-run. I am asking here if the Costume-Con mark holders have made a
>decision either way–to keep Costume-Con as a fan-run only event or
>if the opportunity came up in the future to possibly have a pro-run
>version?

Costume-Con came from fan-run roots, and I just can’t see it ever becoming
pro-run. For Costume-Con to “go pro,” it would have to be my paid full-time
job, and that just isn’t going to happen. I’m not sure what a pro-run
version would be like, but I guarantee you it would no longer resemble the
Costume-Con we have known and loved for 20+ years, and I’m not sure any of
us would like it.

And if Costume-Con “goes pro,” this list and everyone on it becomes
obsolete, as it will be the promoter (me) and a hand-picked group of
committee people calling the shots every year. That’s not what I want, and
I don’t think that’s what you want, either. In spite of some of the
problems generated by having a different committee in a different city
every year, it is the mix of different creative energies that helps keep
Costume-Con going, and trying new things while maintaining some continuity
with the old. “more spice for the stew,” as my artist friend and Clown Hall
of Famer Jim Howle used to say.

>I am thinking that 200 is just about the bare minimum we can have and not
>overwork everyone or have shows with just five or six entries.

I think you are stating the obvious.

BTW, there have been multiple (5?) Costume-Cons with under 200 attendees,
and while the competitons were small, none of them were THAT small. (We’re
back to the statistic that says that there are 100 “hardcore” atendees, and
those “hardcores” are the ones who compete.)

>And, with just 200, we cannot afford a large scale venue for more
>programming, better lighting/sound for the masquerades, or heavily promote
>it because we can’t afford ad space,
>tables at cons, air travel, etc.

Then you provide what you can afford, and make do. There were conventions
where we were happy to have a couple of spotlights and a boom box.

Good Ghod, in the 80’s, when some of the largest CC’s were run, the concom
did not expect the con to pick up the tab for airfares, etc. If we happened
to be going to another con, we took flyers along and tried to mention
Costume-Con on any costuming panels we appeared on. If we were not
attending a con, we tried to send flyers with someone who was, or to
someone local to put out at the con. We put together press packets and sent
them out to local media and national costume- and sewing-based magazines.
Most of the promotion of a CC took place through the mails and phone lines,
not by going to every other convention in person.

Also, you should NOT base your estimation of how Costume-Con should be
properly promoted upon Kevin & Andy’s heavy rotation of bid parties for
CC-26. They are promoting Costume-Con as if it were as large and had
pockets as deep as a WorldCon. It is not, and does not. Much of their party
expense is going to end up coming out of their own pockets. They do it
because (1) they have good jobs and can afford to do it, (2) they like to
throw parties, and (3) they like to SMOF. But even if their Costume-Con
draws 1,000 people, it will not make back the hotel room nights, airfares,
and consumables used at those parties.

>For that reason, we cannot simply have discrete committees working
>independent of each other to create separate and distinct Costume-
>Cons and expect CCs to move onward and upward.

CC was in a strong growth pattern in the 1980’s, when the con was not only
changing committees every year, but bouncing coast to coast as well, so it
*was* “moving onward and upward” with independent committees. (In fact,
most of the committees were more independent than they are now.) Recent
growth problems with the con can be attributed to other factors, some
completely beyond the control of the concoms, which have already been
endlessly discussed here.

I agree that it would be helpful to have some information in a centralized
location so each committee isn’t reinventing the wheel, and that’s why
various items are getting written and incorporated into the CC website as
time permits (like how to put together a bid, how to negotiate with a
hotel, etc., etc.). Some people have put in phenomenal amounts of work so
far, but it’s a long process, and none of us are getting paid for this, so
it’s not going to happen overnight.

If everyone would put as much effort into running and promoting their own
CC’s as they are into writing comments to this list, attendance would not
be an issue. Be aware of the Big Picture, but for the short term, we all
really need to concentrate on the individual Little Pictures.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 660 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Also, you should NOT base your estimation of how Costume-Con should be
> properly promoted upon Kevin & Andy’s heavy rotation of bid parties for
> CC-26. They are promoting Costume-Con as if it were as large and had
> pockets as deep as a WorldCon. It is not, and does not. Much of their party
> expense is going to end up coming out of their own pockets. They do it
> because (1) they have good jobs and can afford to do it, (2) they like to
> throw parties, and (3) they like to SMOF. But even if their Costume-Con
> draws 1,000 people, it will not make back the hotel room nights, airfares,
> and consumables used at those parties.

I’m going to half-argue with this.

I think doing bid/promo parties at key conventions is valuable. I think
Costume-Con, WorldCon and (in our region) WesterCon are the key
traveling conventions. WorldCon and WesterCon are, for us, a way to draw
the attentions of the nomadic fan, and build the core membership.

I think costume-heavy local conventions (and we’ve got an embarrasment
of wealth here, with BayCon, Further Confusion, SiliCon, Fanime,
Yaoi-Con and others) are also worth doing parties at, probably more so
than traveling cons at least for short-term and/or individual gains. By
having a presence at BayCon we draw the attentions of local fans who
might consider driving 4-5 hours to go to a CC but don’t travel any further.

As for the rest of the cons, we’re really doing this sort of thing
because we like to throw parties, and there are so many good conventions
throughout California. We’re going to the cons anyway, so we might as
well. It’s an excuse to pay for a nicer suite. All of our party expenses
come out of our pockets. Our bid lets us at least turn it into a tax
write-off.

And, wildly enough, every time we get a person or two who wouldn’t pick
up a CC flyer asking what this is all about and becoming interested.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 661 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

At 10:33 AM 6/25/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>I’m going to half-argue with this.

Thanks for responding, and thanks for only half-arguing. I really
appreciate what you and Kevin are doing to promote CC, but you have to
admit it’s a hard act for others to follow.

You are fortunate that you have a plethora of conventions within easy
travel distance to you. This may not be the case for folks throwing
Costume-Con bids in other parts of the country. And very few of us can
afford to follow Costume-Con through its annual rotations, let alone
WesterCon and WorldCon.

I think if I were working on a more limited budget than you have, I might
do promo parties also, but closer in to the actual convention once the bid
had been won. JMHO.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 662 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I think if I were working on a more limited budget than you have, I might
> do promo parties also, but closer in to the actual convention once the bid
> had been won. JMHO.

That I won’t argue with. Heavy regional promotion in the last year (or
even two) before the con is a really big deal. I don’t think our
promotion is going to get us that many votes. I could be wrong, though 😉

I’m going to pick on Charles and Dave a bit.

Quite a few California con nomads go to more “inland” western
conventions than we do. Over the last 6 months at conventions I’ve heard
“There’s a Costume-Con in Utah? Why haven’t we seen them promoting?” or
“I saw Dave/Charles/whomever at a con last month, and they weren’t doing
anything to promote CC.”

Now, I know some of this (not making it to conventions) was purely life
getting in the way. Not promoting at a convention you’re at (or even
being perceived as not promoting at a convention you’re at) is a
problem, though.

Face time is important in that last year. Face time is really important
that last year if it hasn’t been happening much before. Hell, we
volunteered to run LACon’s masquerade (they got someone local and
competent who has been building bridges and putting out political fires
the last few years) to get mondo local and international face time for
our run-up. We’ll probably still volunteer for prominent positions in
the LACon Masquerade (and encourage our committee members to do the
same) to get the exposure.

anyway, that’s enough rant for the moment.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 663 From: David Doering Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Challenges on Promotion

>Andy wrote: “I’m going to pick on Charles and Dave a bit… Not promoting
>at a convention you’re at (or even
>being perceived as not promoting at a convention you’re at) is a problem,
>though.”

I won’t argue the point to say that CC23 could do more to promote itself. I
think every con could do more. Charles and I are also perfectly willing to
admit to our limitations when it comes to face time. It’s no excuse, but
both of us lost our jobs two years ago and still have not found comparable
full-time employment. So rather than our expected canvassing of WorldCons,
Westercons, etc., we have been staying closer to home.

However, to be fair, neither of us have been to any cons other than to
CostumeCon. So if someone recalls seeing “Dave” or “Charles” elsewhere not
promoting CC23, I’d like to know about it. (And Kenneth Branagh doesn’t
count for Dave.)

I am grateful to the many people who have stepped up to the plate to
promote us at various cons throughout the country. I think it has helped to
have local people there promote CC.

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org

>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > I think if I were working on a more limited budget than you have, I might
> > do promo parties also, but closer in to the actual convention once the bid
> > had been won. JMHO.
>
>That I won’t argue with. Heavy regional promotion in the last year (or
>even two) before the con is a really big deal. I don’t think our
>promotion is going to get us that many votes. I could be wrong, though 😉
>
>I’m going to pick on Charles and Dave a bit.
>
>Quite a few California con nomads go to more “inland” western
>conventions than we do. Over the last 6 months at conventions I’ve heard
>”There’s a Costume-Con in Utah? Why haven’t we seen them promoting?” or
>”I saw Dave/Charles/whomever at a con last month, and they weren’t doing
>anything to promote CC.”
>
>Now, I know some of this (not making it to conventions) was purely life
>getting in the way. Not promoting at a convention you’re at (or even
>being perceived as not promoting at a convention you’re at) is a
>problem, though.
>
>Face time is important in that last year. Face time is really important
>that last year if it hasn’t been happening much before. Hell, we
>volunteered to run LACon’s masquerade (they got someone local and
>competent who has been building bridges and putting out political fires
>the last few years) to get mondo local and international face time for
>our run-up. We’ll probably still volunteer for prominent positions in
>the LACon Masquerade (and encourage our committee members to do the
>same) to get the exposure.
>
>anyway, that’s enough rant for the moment.
>
>andy
>
>
>View the Document:
><http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/>http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>———-
>Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> *
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
> *
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> *
> <mailto:runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> *
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 664 From: David Doering Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

>Karen wrote: “”Pro run” means “promoter” run, NOT “professionally” run.”

I agree. After spending some time thinking through your post, I also
conclude that the current volunteer/rotation system is in fact the most
realistic way to run CC. I also agree that even with a volunteer staff, the
CC can still be run professionally.

It isn’t that I was looking for a way to make CC a “pro run” (in either
sense), rather, that we congenially accept the limitations we impose on
ourselves for having an all-volunteer rotation system.

I would like to see CC hit 450-500 attendees each year, however, if for no
other reason than for the variety of different talents/interests we would
see. To get there takes intelligent action with less re-inventing the
wheel, which is why I ask questions here. Also, lots of passion, which, if
the ICG lists are any indication, we are chock full of.

Dave D.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 665 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Archon Party Question
Hello!
I know that the SLCG/CC25 will be having a party at Archon, and CC24 most
likely. At this point, I am planning on having a combo party for CC23 and the
CC26? bid Friday night.
Does any other bids want in on my party?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 666 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

At 04:10 PM 6/25/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>I would like to see CC hit 450-500 attendees each year.

Absolutely! So would I. We are definitely in agreement there. Hopefully,
the con is now in a rebuilding phase. And the economy is improving, right?
Mr. Bush says it is, right?

>To get there takes intelligent action with less re-inventing the
>wheel, which is why I ask questions here.

You and Charles also come from a general fannish background vs. a costuming
background, so some of what the rest of us take for granted as Costume Con
history/culture may seem bewildering to you at times. There is usually some
piece of sound logic (or some historical bit of trial and error) as to why
we do some of the stuff we do.

>Also, lots of passion, which, if the ICG lists are any indication, we are
>chock full of.

*hee!* The problem is keeping the passion from erupting into flame wars at
any given time.

–Karen (off to email Fran Evans about getting her mailing list of
designers, so we can solicit them directly for the CC-23 Design Contest)

 

Group: runacc Message: 667 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

In a message dated 6/25/2004 6:50:23 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> The problem is keeping the passion from erupting into flame wars at
> any given time.

I have to say that, for the most part, Costuming Fandom has managed to keep
most of the Politics out of our field. The WorldCon field is overgrown with
Politics, which is why I rather play in with the rest of you. You share your
toys!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 668 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con
Oh, and one last word on “promoter-run” conventions.

My typical use of the word “promoter” is as an adjective attached to the
noun “scum.”

This is a real hot spot for me right now, as my livelihood is currently
being severely impacted by the promoter scum (TransWorld Corp.) that runs
the annual Halloween, Costume, Party, and GIft trade show in Chicago. The
story is too long to go into here–just suffice it to say that if I
disliked “promoter-run” conventions before, I absolutely LOATHE them now.
And this is why I reacted as strongly as I did to the suggestion that
Costume-Con become “pro-run.”

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 669 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Future of Costume Con (was Big conventions)

> CC was in a strong growth pattern in the 1980’s, when the con was not only
> changing committees every year, but bouncing coast to coast as well, so it
> *was* “moving onward and upward” with independent committees. (In fact,
> most of the committees were more independent than they are now.) Recent
> growth problems with the con can be attributed to other factors, some
> completely beyond the control of the concoms, which have already been
> endlessly discussed here.

Don’t forget the demographics of we Baby Boomers showing up in droves at
these events.

Regarding andy’s comments, I anticipate that CC26 will get a goodly number
of people than, say, here in the Midwest or the East Coast, but I still
seriously doubt it will be close to the size of CC8. If I’m wrong, I’ll be
pleasantly suprised (and would hope to be there for it).

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 670 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
We’ve come to the conclusion that the time is not right for a common cause
flyer, because this list gets too easliy distracted by side issues that are
far more “interesting” to talk about — like pro-run cons, and ICG
discounts.

Pardon us if this seems a bit huffy in tone, but we’re tired of trying to
make our case for a combined effort. We still believe that a common flyer
can be distributed to more places throughout the nation than one that is
only distributed regionally. If Andy’s flyer is the best CC as an
organization can muster, then we guess that’s the best we can hope for, even
if it only reaches costumers on the West Coast.

We (Nora and Bruce) will create our own flyer which will include mentions of
the future CCs and bids and try to get as many Midwesterners as we can and
try to hit a few other big cons on the Coasts. We don’t want to be in the
position of prodding people to help promote their own CCs.

 

Group: runacc Message: 671 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

Henry–

You missed the Big Flame Wars in CostumAPA in the 80’s.

Most of us who were chucking fireballs at each other then are now friendly.
Go figure.

–Karen

At 07:54 PM 6/25/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>In a message dated 6/25/2004 6:50:23 PM Central Daylight Time,
>castleb@pulsenet.com writes:
> > The problem is keeping the passion from erupting into flame wars at
> > any given time.
>I have to say that, for the most part, Costuming Fandom has managed to keep
>most of the Politics out of our field. The WorldCon field is overgrown with
>Politics, which is why I rather play in with the rest of you. You share your
>toys!
> Henry
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 672 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/25/2004
Subject: More on promotion…just FYI
Hi!

Speaking for CCXV, which broke 400 just by sheer force of will, I will
say that a large part of the reason why we managed to do so stemmed from
my personal shepparding of flyers to a variety of venues that had
nothing to do with attending either Costume-Con or regular SF cons.

We also hit virtually every historic event and many of the regional cons
with handfuls of flyers. I think I’d have to check my records but we
attended more than 6 major regional cons that year just before CCXV. We
had an ad in the WorldCon program, traded space for as many ads as we
could so we didn’t break the budget for advertising.

But I’m noticing that a number of the people we had at CCXV no longer
attend anything in our area – they’ve moved away or changed interests. I
suspect that if we did it again next year, we’d find it hard to make 300.

And a tip: I’ve got a bunch of costume-friendly cons listed in the links
page of Costume-Con.org. Contact them and tell them that you’ll be
willing to trade ad space with them if they’ll publish your ads for free
or deep discount.

You could also approach the events I have listed in The ICG Newsletter,
if they aren’t on the CC site.

The only way to be sure the con gets noticed is to do the promotion.
There are ways to do the promotion without hosting parties in person.

By the way, speaking of the newsletter, I have ad space available. I
suspect a deal could be worked with the editor to include ads for
upcoming CCs, if the information could get into her hands…. 9-)

There are five issues of the newsletter to be published between now and
CC23…..hint…

-b


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 673 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)

I think the “common cause” flyer is a very good idea.

However, the CC-26 bid has put considerable time and effort into developing
and distributing their own flyers, so a “common cause” flyer is redundant
to them. Also, they are also not a seated committee yet (as the bid has not
been voted upon), so they may be wise to keep CC-26 a separate entity from
CC-23/24/25, as CC-26 is not yet fully “official” and can’t be presented as
such.

Any bids past CC-26 are still in the “very nebulous” stage (no firm dates,
venue, etc.) and therefore aren’t ready to participate.

Ideally, CC-23, -24, and -25 should do “common cause” advertising and
flyers together if it’s going to be done this year, as they are all past
the bidding/voting stage and have seated committees. But it is entirely up
to the committees of CC-23 and CC-24 if they want to do this.

Unfortunately, you have just demonstrated the difficulty of having any kind
of centralized “information flow” for Costume Con from year to year.

–Karen

At 10:19 PM 6/25/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>We’ve come to the conclusion that the time is not right for a common cause
>flyer, because this list gets too easliy distracted by side issues that are
>far more “interesting” to talk about — like pro-run cons, and ICG
>discounts.
>
>Pardon us if this seems a bit huffy in tone, but we’re tired of trying to
>make our case for a combined effort. We still believe that a common flyer
>can be distributed to more places throughout the nation than one that is
>only distributed regionally. If Andy’s flyer is the best CC as an
>organization can muster, then we guess that’s the best we can hope for, even
>if it only reaches costumers on the West Coast.
>
>We (Nora and Bruce) will create our own flyer which will include mentions of
>the future CCs and bids and try to get as many Midwesterners as we can and
>try to hit a few other big cons on the Coasts. We don’t want to be in the
>position of prodding people to help promote their own CCs.
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 674 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: More on promotion…just FYI

At 11:47 PM 6/25/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>But I’m noticing that a number of the people we had at CCXV no longer
>attend anything in our area – they’ve moved away or changed interests. I
>suspect that if we did it again next year, we’d find it hard to make 300.

I think the con attendance could be pushed higher than that if Costume-Con
actively courted the anime crowd. If even a small percentage of them
attended, it could really boost CC’s numbers.
This is also true of other geographic areas besides the Baltimore/DC corridor.

The problem with CC is that we need new blood, and the S/F community is not
the “feeder” system that it used to be. So we need to get the word out to
LARPers, anime fans, media cons, art-to-wear ladies, quilters, dollmakers,
drag queens, historical dance groups, bead groups, you name it. Kevin and
Andy are already trying to do this sort of outreach for CC-26. I’ll admit
I’m scared about what an infusion of so many different groups is going to
do to the overall “flavor” of the con, but it’s obvious that the con is not
going to survive if it only has S/F costumers and a smattering of
historical costumers to carry it.

“More spice for the stew,” right…?

>The only way to be sure the con gets noticed is to do the promotion.
>There are ways to do the promotion without hosting parties in person.

Absolutely.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 675 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

Not so much bewildering, as having to re-scale certain features. Since I’ve been involved in convention-fandom, and dance-events, so many things seem familiar from event to event. Publicity, logistics, planning, bugeting, security. But the % of $ for photography, FFF, staging, out-of-state publicity comes out much higher. Another thing that caught us a bit off-guard, is new technology — even if I knew how to run last years CC, what do I do next year? Color, on-line FFF? How do I protect publication rights for an on-line FFF? DVD or VHS masquerade recording? MP3 pre-set masquerade sound-tracks? (it would be better than the last CONduit juggling trick) CD photo collection? And ASCAP license. Much of this is new to me. Also site voting, Life-Time Achivement awards, are new.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Future of Costume Con

At 04:10 PM 6/25/2004 -0600, you wrote:
<snip>
You and Charles also come from a general fannish background vs. a costuming
background, so some of what the rest of us take for granted as Costume Con
history/culture may seem bewildering to you at times. There is usually some
piece of sound logic (or some historical bit of trial and error) as to why
we do some of the stuff we do.

<snip>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 676 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Challenges on Promotion

Yes, there have been some economic reasons for reduced travel in promotions. I fully expected Dave and I to be at hopefully different two conventions a year average. (Dave has a daughter he did not have when we first initiated the bid — I started grad school last fall.) But that does not mean that we couldn’t also arrange out-of-town assistance to help promote. But I would say that has been minimal promotion, until relatively recently (not pointing fingers).

It was a bit agonizing not to make it to Chicago, and a bit of a pinch to send Dave to Atlanta, but we knew someone had to make it to Atlanta.

I know Calgary sent down flyers for CONduit, but the four folks that made it from here, would have been there anyway (supporting our bid) — and we were pretty close (less than two flying hours — well it did cost a bit to fly). It would be hard to say how many more would have traveled out there, if they could have promoted here personally — probably not very many. Our guild certainly informed local guild members. I hope Calgary did visit Seattle, but I don’t kwow.

The costume-fan market is a narrow niche, and the collective publicity needs to be mixed with face-on connection. I’m more likely to go to an out-of-state event if: I have heard about it, and if I get a face-to-face invitation.

It seems like having a masquerade panel at local cons, showing CC videos, supporting local masquerades (which seems prevalent), and then the face-to-face (closer to the event), needs to be an appropriate mix.

We had good face-to-face contact at Hartford (CC-18), but at this far out, I don’t know yet how much that will actually result in attendees.

I do belive we need to promote nationally, for CC in general, and not just each regional CC event.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: David Doering
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: [runacc] Challenges on Promotion

>Andy wrote: “I’m going to pick on Charles and Dave a bit… Not promoting
>at a convention you’re at (or even
>being perceived as not promoting at a convention you’re at) is a problem,
>though.”

I won’t argue the point to say that CC23 could do more to promote itself. I
think every con could do more. Charles and I are also perfectly willing to
admit to our limitations when it comes to face time. It’s no excuse, but
both of us lost our jobs two years ago and still have not found comparable
full-time employment. So rather than our expected canvassing of WorldCons,
Westercons, etc., we have been staying closer to home.

However, to be fair, neither of us have been to any cons other than to
CostumeCon. So if someone recalls seeing “Dave” or “Charles” elsewhere not
promoting CC23, I’d like to know about it. (And Kenneth Branagh doesn’t
count for Dave.)

I am grateful to the many people who have stepped up to the plate to
promote us at various cons throughout the country. I think it has helped to
have local people there promote CC.

Dave Doering
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org

>
>
>———-
>Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> *
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
> *
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> *
> <mailto:runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> *
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 677 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)

Yes, we’ve discussed this for at least a year, but I would not dismiss either. For CC-23, we’ve often had other priorties, but do expect to start on some general advertising. (# x+1 priority, on a list of x) I suspect the other bids are in a similar status.

The importance of such advertising is likely to get imbedded in our agendas, and re-emerge later.

Thanks for the comment.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 9:19 PM
Subject: [runacc] We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)

We’ve come to the conclusion that the time is not right for a common cause
flyer, because this list gets too easliy distracted by side issues that are
far more “interesting” to talk about — like pro-run cons, and ICG
discounts.

Pardon us if this seems a bit huffy in tone, but we’re tired of trying to
make our case for a combined effort. We still believe that a common flyer
can be distributed to more places throughout the nation than one that is
only distributed regionally. If Andy’s flyer is the best CC as an
organization can muster, then we guess that’s the best we can hope for, even
if it only reaches costumers on the West Coast.

We (Nora and Bruce) will create our own flyer which will include mentions of
the future CCs and bids and try to get as many Midwesterners as we can and
try to hit a few other big cons on the Coasts. We don’t want to be in the
position of prodding people to help promote their own CCs.

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 678 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…
This is a long, rambling message, but there is a point…

If it’s any help, there’s been a common conception (mis or otherwise)
that each con needs its own focus/limelight, and that the next one
coming up needs to be in the forefront of advertising. The Fashion Folio
is a prime example of this kind of thinking. I know I’ve heard people
say that it’s important for the current CC to get the materials out now,
and for the other CCs to wait until the deadline is over to start
heavily promoting, to avoid stepping on toes. I think that this
hesitation to advertise more than one CC at a time ultimately loses the
momentum built up by the previous year’s CC, especially when pulling in
local people who haven’t been to a CC in the past and who might be
willing to travel to future CCs.

In defense of the future CCs, it is Really Hard to concentrate energy on
an event that is taking place two years in advance or more.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what needs to happen to ensure that you’re
going to get the widest field of attendees. And the sooner you get those
groups who don’t traditionally go to CC (Anime, LARP, re-enactor, etc.)
involved in the process, the better targeted your program will be
because you will know what these people are interested in learning.

I was aware of the difference between promoter-run events like the local
sewing events, which are commonly targeting quilters or art-to-wear
enthusiasts, and CCs since I was taking flyers to these events (and
re-enactments, LARPs, etc.). The biggie is the publication as early as
possible of the actual program. Simply saying that there will be
programming without indicating what that programming will be, for those
who have never been to a Costume-Con before, generally isn’t enough to
attract people who haven’t been before.

When I used to work for associations and dealt with their annual
meetings, people would request the program months in advance. Now,
granted, these associations had the dollars to be able to fix their
programs early – at least two months prior to the events with only minor
tweaking for participants – but I was fielding similar requests for info
about CCXV at least three months out.

If you know at least the highlights of the panels or demos or workshops
you plan to offer, providing this info ASAP is a Good Thing.

Ditto for the competition rules – the sooner these are set, the easier
it will be for you to use them as part of your advertising.

Interestingly, regarding SF cons as a source of incoming blood for CCs,
I was just talking with Larry Schroeder yesterday about the shrinking
of masquerades. He wanted to know if we were going to be at WorldCon
this year. The answer is, well, no. Sort of. We’re thinking of being up
at the con for the LOTR exhibit, and planning to be there during
Noreascon, if we can get tickets. But I just can’t justify paying the
membership fee they want for a WorldCon anymore. We saw a panel and a
half at Millenium Philcon, and spent pretty much the rest of the time
sitting in the convention center hallway entertaining Erin, who wasn’t
yet one and still too small to participate meaningfully in the con.
We’ll have the same issues with Katie this year, in spades, because
she’s three months behind what Erin was at MilPhil in development for
this year’s event (birthday in January versus birthday in October).
(wow, that’s an awkward sentence!)

It’s my feeling that WorldCon is pricing itself out of business – the
more it costs, the less likely it will be able to attract the younger
fen because the membership fees are huge. Dragon*Con charges below $90
for membership. Contrast that with $180 for Noreascon and it suddenly
becomes a lot easier to see why the younger crowd is heading elsewhere.
The Anime and fringe cons are even less expensive.

And those of us who could possibly afford to go have other priorities in
the way (see my comments about my family above, for example). I simply
can’t justify spending the bux to go and sit in the hallway. I can
generally do that for free. Yeah, I miss the masquerade, but considering
that I missed the end of the Historical at CC, I can’t be sure how much
I’d see anyway this year. Frankly, if I can’t leave the kids behind for
CC23, I’ll shell out the $$ but I don’t know how much I’m going to be
able to participate.

I guess what this means is that we’re going to have to work harder and
smarter to continue to pull in new blood if we’re going to up those
membership numbers. And advertising/promotion is a HUGE part of the process.

Betsy



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 679 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

Charles–

Some of it is new technology to me, too (on-line FFF). You just do the best
you can.

–Karen

At 07:53 PM 6/25/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>Not so much bewildering, as having to re-scale certain features. Since
>I’ve been involved in convention-fandom, and dance-events, so many things
>seem familiar from event to event. Publicity, logistics, planning,
>bugeting, security. But the % of $ for photography, FFF, staging,
>out-of-state publicity comes out much higher. Another thing that caught
>us a bit off-guard, is new technology — even if I knew how to run last
>years CC, what do I do next year? Color, on-line FFF? How do I protect
>publication rights for an on-line FFF? DVD or VHS masquerade
>recording? MP3 pre-set masquerade sound-tracks? (it would be better than
>the last CONduit juggling trick) CD photo collection? And ASCAP
>license. Much of this is new to me. Also site voting, Life-Time
>Achivement awards, are new.
>
>Charles
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Ricky & Karen Dick
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Future of Costume Con
>
>
> At 04:10 PM 6/25/2004 -0600, you wrote:
> <snip>
> You and Charles also come from a general fannish background vs. a
> costuming
> background, so some of what the rest of us take for granted as Costume Con
> history/culture may seem bewildering to you at times. There is usually
> some
> piece of sound logic (or some historical bit of trial and error) as to why
> we do some of the stuff we do.
>
> <snip>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>——————————————————————————
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 680 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

That’s a fannish tradition — do the best you can, possibly bite off a little more than you can chew, and innovate.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Future of Costume Con

Charles–

Some of it is new technology to me, too (on-line FFF). You just do the best
you can.

–Karen

> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 681 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

And if it screws up, tap dance.

–Karen

At 11:37 AM 6/26/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>That’s a fannish tradition — do the best you can, possibly bite off a
>little more than you can chew, and innovate.
>
>Charles
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Ricky & Karen Dick
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Future of Costume Con
>
>
> Charles–
>
> Some of it is new technology to me, too (on-line FFF). You just do the
> best
> you can.
>
> –Karen
>
> > >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>——————————————————————————
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 682 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

In a message dated 6/25/2004 10:20:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> You missed the Big Flame Wars in CostumAPA in the 80’s.

Karen,
I only go into fandom around 1984. Sorry if that makes you feel old.
Admittedly, I have been around and slow in getting to the position that I am in,
but I still feel like a newcomer. It probably comes from too many years hanging
out with old timers that told too many “No ‘kidding’, I was there” BS stories.
I do know that I have coveted the outside position and learned by watching
mistakes by people, even those that were close to me at the time.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 683 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Bruce & Nora,
Never give up! Never surrender! I believe in your grand unified flyer
concept. I also believe in the individual flyer that also gives even more info
about a specific CC.
I, personally, would love to have a copy of your grand unified flyer.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 684 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2004
Subject: Re: Future of Costume Con

At 08:04 PM 6/26/2004 -0400, you wrote:

> I only go into fandom around 1984. Sorry if that makes you feel old.

Lots of fannish folk (and costumers!) “older” in fandom than me, just not
necessarily writing on this board, LOL!

1984 was the year of LACon II, one of the largest WorldCons (and
masquerades!) ever. Lots of frayed tempers and flame wars that year, and
the publication of the infamous CostumApa 8.5.
Very difficult to be very competitve on stage and then try to find the
“off” switch the rest of the time, especially when you are young and full
of piss and vinegar.

I now live about 2 hours from one of my most bitter rivals in those days
(Sally Fink), and we socialize several times a year. I’ve also asked her to
be a judge for the CC-23 Fashion Design Contest.

Times change, eh?

>I do know that I have coveted the outside position and learned by watching
>mistakes by people, even those that were close to me at the time.

Good to learn by watching others, both the “this works” stuff and the “this
was a really bad idea” stuff. I try to keep learning new things all the
time, so I don’t fossilize.

“When you’re green, you grow. When you’re ripe, you rot.”

All of us need to stay green.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 685 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/27/2004
Subject: Question for Charles & Dave
Does CC23 have a specific logo or are you just using a generic Egyptian
look?

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 686 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/27/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)
Thank you from both of us for finally some constructive talk about
promotion. Now, the next step is we all have to actively DO something.
We’ll have some info for you all shortly, but we want to get our ducks in a
row, first.

As for the venues discussion, I think we had this discussion partially at
CC22, but it bears expansion. Our “seasoned” members have always stressed
the necessity to hit the big conventions, like Worldcon, obviously, but as
Karen stated, our new numbers are not going to be coming from there. I
hadn’t completely considered the financial factor of younger people (and not
so young) who can’t afford a Worldcon. We need to concentrate more on the
smaller or newer media cons, like the anime crowd, the furries and the
regional general SF events like our Archon that are cheaper to go to.
Frankly, the way things are going, Worldcon will eventually become
irrelevant for many costumers who don’t have the time or money to make the
grander outfits that appear on that stage. That is going to take more
co-ordination than the individual con committees are used to. Hence, the
necessity for at least ACTING like a central corporation, even though we
will not be. If it appears we are represented everywhere, that can only
help.

Betsy had a number of very good points about the smaller, niche groups that
most of us have no experience with at all. We need to come up with a plan
to reach those folks. Again, watch this space.

Thanks for the support, Henry. 🙂

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 687 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)

On Jun 25, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> However, the CC-26 bid has put considerable time and effort into
> developing
> and distributing their own flyers, so a “common cause” flyer is
> redundant
> to them. Also, they are also not a seated committee yet (as the bid
> has not
> been voted upon), so they may be wise to keep CC-26 a separate entity
> from
> CC-23/24/25, as CC-26 is not yet fully “official” and can’t be
> presented as
> such.

I hadn’t thought quite in those terms, but you’re exactly right.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 688 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…

On Jun 26, 2004, at 3:51 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> If it’s any help, there’s been a common conception (mis or otherwise)
> that each con needs its own focus/limelight, and that the next one
> coming up needs to be in the forefront of advertising. The Fashion
> Folio
> is a prime example of this kind of thinking. I know I’ve heard people
> say that it’s important for the current CC to get the materials out
> now,
> and for the other CCs to wait until the deadline is over to start
> heavily promoting, to avoid stepping on toes. I think that this
> hesitation to advertise more than one CC at a time ultimately loses the
> momentum built up by the previous year’s CC, especially when pulling in
> local people who haven’t been to a CC in the past and who might be
> willing to travel to future CCs.

I’m going to split the difference with you on the question of promoting
the folio. I think that the folio should be promoting two years out,
which means overlapping with a previous folio. The only cut-point I
think that needs to be in place is that entries aren’t accepted until
the previous folio closes registration.

I’m also going to argue violently against promoting only the next CC.
When folks hear our bid is for ’08, the next thing they want to hear
(if they are at all interested) is where CC will be next year (et al).
I don’t know if we’ll successfully build any business for Utah, but
we’re at least building buzz for them.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 689 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Coordinating between CCs – some general thoughts…

At 01:02 PM 6/28/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>I think that the folio should be promoting two years out,
>which means overlapping with a previous folio. The only cut-point I
>think that needs to be in place is that entries aren’t accepted until
>the previous folio closes registration.

Works for me. I think you said in an earlier discussion that the Folio
should always be open for entries–when the deadline hits for one CC, then
entries should be directed to the next one.

>I’m also going to argue violently against promoting only the next CC.

I agree–like WorldCon and other rotatings cons, CC needs to be promoted as
far out as possible so people can start making plans, saving vacation time,
and saving travel $$$ if they need to go some distance to get there. In the
80’s, people were always amazed at work when I knew what dates I needed off
(for WorldCon, WesterCon, and Costume-Con) 2-3 years in advance.

Haunters just started their own rotating convention (HauntCon) this year.
The idea is to be in a different city each year to allow members to visit
local haunts that are in permanent facilities.
It will be interesting to see what kind of membership they draw each year.
(The first one drew 500; the promoter would like the con to draw
2,000-3,000.) Like Costume-Con, there is a certain group that will follow
the con around the country, but it is not that large. The first one was in
Charlotte, NC, and they even did TV advertising to try to reach the home
haunter and horror movie fan crowd, but I don’t think it was very effective.

>When folks hear our bid is for ’08, the next thing they want to hear
>(if they are at all interested) is where CC will be next year (et al).
>I don’t know if we’ll successfully build any business for Utah, but
>we’re at least building buzz for them.

Hey, Ricky just met someone at an Indiana haunt convention last weekend who
lives in the Ogden area, had never heard of Costume-Con, and is now jazzed
that there is an event like that coming to their home town, LOL!

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 690 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up — (was Future of Costume Con and other threads)

On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:19 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Pardon us if this seems a bit huffy in tone, but we’re tired of trying
> to
> make our case for a combined effort. We still believe that a common
> flyer
> can be distributed to more places throughout the nation than one that
> is
> only distributed regionally. If Andy’s flyer is the best CC as an
> organization can muster, then we guess that’s the best we can hope
> for, even
> if it only reaches costumers on the West Coast.
>
> We (Nora and Bruce) will create our own flyer which will include
> mentions of
> the future CCs and bids and try to get as many Midwesterners as we can
> and
> try to hit a few other big cons on the Coasts. We don’t want to be in
> the
> position of prodding people to help promote their own CCs.

I think many of us are pushing, and there are solutions.

I have encouraged people in this group to enter the conventions they’re
going to be at in the calendar, and set reminders to be mailed out.
Why? So we can make use of the group and mail flyers out to those
folks. Our WesterCon reminder went out two weeks ago. I’d take your
fliers to WesterCon, but we’re leaving on Thursday morning, so it’s a
bit late to mail packets. Still, if anybody can get me flyer files, I
can print some to take along.

We have developed a large bid/marketing committee, with members around
the country. We have our own calendar reminders, and our folks
regularly email us asking to restock on fliers and award ribbons for
their convention seasons. I know our fliers and awards are seen at
local and regional cons around the country.

Oh, and of course, it’s in the interest of any bid to promote the CC
that their vote takes place at. More memberships means more potential
votes which means more potential supporting members and more seed
money.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 691 From: David Doering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea

>Nora asked: “Does CC23 have a specific logo or are you just using a
>generic Egyptian look?”

We are working on a logo reflecting costuming, the Egyptian Theater, Utah’s
Delicate Arch. and a Stargate.

Dave Doering

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 692 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for St. Louis

ages ago, on Apr 27, 2004, at 4:29 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> What about St. Louis?

I was talking with Empress Helen Twelvetrees and Emperor Tim of Las
Vegas last week at Reno Coronation.

Word from them is a Baronial Court is being formed in St. Louis. If
you’ve got folks who can watch the local gay newsrag for announcements,
keep an eye out for “Baronial Adornment,” the event where the first
Baron and Baroness of St. Louis will be elected and announced. It will
probably be a pretty major regional event.

And just a reminder for Ogden and Des Moines:

http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/desmoines.html
http://www.imperialcourtofia.org/Coronation%20XI.htm
Iowa coronation is September 25, 2004, and there’s a tiny chance we
might be there. Now they’ve got a theme… “Vampires, Witches and
Warlocks: A Nocturnal Journey into Magic, Voodoo and Beyond.” The
fancier and gothier the better.

http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/ogden.html
Ogden’s coronation is November 19, 2004. They’ve got a crap theme: “An
Evening of Diversity, Worldwide Celebration”
Coronations take part in “acts” and they’re doing a different theme for
each act (I assume in this order)
A Journey to Cirque du Soleil
Party Down Bourbon Street
Celebrate A Chinese New Year


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 693 From: David Doering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: We give up
Bruce and Nora:

As the instigator of the various threads that took attention away from the
flyer issue, I apologize.

I think part of the problem with uniting us behind a flyer is the struggle
we have in being relatively autonomous concoms. I for one am not sure if I
should take the bull by the horns to confirm the use of a general purpose
flyer or wait for someone else to do so.

This can change, of course. However, since we don’t have an accepted
procedure to create and store draft flyers, review that flyer content, then
approve it, it is going to take a while to get everyone on the same page.

Actually, I think we are on our way towards solving this even if it doesn’t
look like it.

Dave Doering

 

Group: runacc Message: 694 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea

Little busy there. Will this be soon? “Branding” for a con is always good
and should be started early.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “David Doering” <dave@techvoice.com>
> >Nora asked: “Does CC23 have a specific logo or are you just using a
> >generic Egyptian look?”
>
> We are working on a logo reflecting costuming, the Egyptian Theater,
Utah’s
> Delicate Arch. and a Stargate.
>
> Dave Doering
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 695 From: davedoering Date: 6/28/2004
Subject: Re: CC23 Logo idea
Nora asked: Will this be soon?”

I would have wanted it ten months ago. This is a case of
someone “committing to the job” and not coming through. So now it’s
time to rush on Plan B.

Dave D.

 

Group: runacc Message: 696 From: David Doering Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Andy raised an interesting point about how to describe our style of costume
activity. While Costume-Con welcomes the professional costumer, it is
primarily focused on those of us who do it for the love of costumes. We’ve
referred to this as being an “avocational” (vs. professional) costumer on
the CC23 website.

However, is this clear?

When we thought about this, here were our notes:

Amateur costumer–Doesn’t really convey the level of expertise of many
costumers. Often used to contrast a high-quality production vs. a less
careful one.
Hobbyist–Sounds like a dilettante, again not quite reflecting the efforts
seen in anime, furry, or historical costumes.
Recreational costumer–Conveys a less serious tone. Might be confusing with
“recreation” vs. “re-creation”
Leisure costumer–Discounts the enormous amount of work put into a good costume
Avocational–Might suggest pretentiousness. (Andy says it is “a touch too
clever”)

We opted for the latter term because it carried less baggage than the others.

Ideas?

Dave Doering
CC23

 

Group: runacc Message: 697 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

I don’t think we should even try to reduce the kind of people
Costume-Con attracts to one label – it makes our appeal far too focused.
I’d approach the description paragraphically, giving a short list of the
types of people who have attended in the past.

Dave, do Pioneer Days attract as many Rendezvous, western and Native
American exhibitors as they used to? We made it a point each year we
were out at Garden City to drive into Logan for the events. That might
be a treasure trove for attracting new people.

I especially recall a historic fashion show held several years running.

Granted, it’s been well over a decade (closer to two) since I was out
there during summer, but still….

-b

David Doering wrote:

> Andy raised an interesting point about how to describe our style of costume
> activity. While Costume-Con welcomes the professional costumer, it is
> primarily focused on those of us who do it for the love of costumes. We’ve
> referred to this as being an “avocational” (vs. professional) costumer on
> the CC23 website.
>
> However, is this clear?
>
> When we thought about this, here were our notes:
>
> Amateur costumer–Doesn’t really convey the level of expertise of many
> costumers. Often used to contrast a high-quality production vs. a less
> careful one.
> Hobbyist–Sounds like a dilettante, again not quite reflecting the efforts
> seen in anime, furry, or historical costumes.
> Recreational costumer–Conveys a less serious tone. Might be confusing with
> “recreation” vs. “re-creation”
> Leisure costumer–Discounts the enormous amount of work put into a good
> costume
> Avocational–Might suggest pretentiousness. (Andy says it is “a touch too
> clever”)
>
> We opted for the latter term because it carried less baggage than the
> others.
>
> Ideas?
>
> Dave Doering
> CC23
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1292ojo57/M=298184.5022502.6152625.3001176/D=groups/S=1707300337:HM/EXP=1088627852/A=2197946/R=0/SIG=11elgumq7/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60183367>
>
>
> ————————————————————————
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 698 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist
Betsy,
I think you nailed the spirit of it all in a nutshell. I can remember
having some great fabric conversations at a local Rendezvous.
We shouldn’t try to label who comes to CC’s. At most, we should offer
examples of who shows up.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 699 From: David Doering Date: 6/29/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

>Henry wrote: “We shouldn’t try to label who comes to CC’s.”

Betsy wrote: “I don’t think we should even try to reduce the kind of people
Costume-Con attracts to one label…”

Don’t get me wrong. I too want every kind of costumer–Royal Court, Middle
Eastern, Furry, Anime, Historical–to come. I also don’t want to label any
group as “the chosen ones” versus the “groundlings.” Hence our “crossroads”
theme for CC23.

However, when we need to be brief, such as with the mundane press, on a
flyer, or in an ad, what would be most appropriate?

Dave D.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 700 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: Re: Avocational vs. Hobbyist

Not to plagiarize, but here’s what the ICG lists on their site:

“We welcome everyone with an interest in the art of costuming – from
concept to assembly to display and all stages in between – in all areas
of costume. Our members include historic reenactors, professional,
educational and community theatrical costumers, science fiction
fans,renaissance festival participants, and a vast array of others who
are interested in the making, wearing and display of costume.”

It isn’t the shortest sentence in the world, but it does convey the
important stuff. Some tweaking to allow for “original” text might be
good, and it could, in theory, be shortened, but if you’re sending out a
press release, that’s how I’d phrase it.

I recall sitting in the lobby at the Lord Baltimore talking to a
reporter just after the Fashion Show at CCXV, explaining who we were. It
took quite some time. Fortunately, I had Bridget Landry and Vicki Warren
wander by – a rocket scientist and nuclear physicist respectively. It
was a prime example of the reach we have, and the ecclectic composition
of our crowd.

I’d emphasize the crossroads theme when talking about the different
aspects of our community, to bring focus to that theme. And for a deeper
explanation, you can always point them to your web site and to mine,
which contains an excellent explanation of our history at:

http://www.Costume-Con.org/genesis.shtml

-b

David Doering wrote:

>
> >Henry wrote: “We shouldn’t try to label who comes to CC’s.”
>
> Betsy wrote: “I don’t think we should even try to reduce the kind of people
> Costume-Con attracts to one label…”
>
> Don’t get me wrong. I too want every kind of costumer–Royal Court, Middle
> Eastern, Furry, Anime, Historical–to come. I also don’t want to label any
> group as “the chosen ones” versus the “groundlings.” Hence our “crossroads”
> theme for CC23.
>
> However, when we need to be brief, such as with the mundane press, on a
> flyer, or in an ad, what would be most appropriate?
>
> Dave D.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> *Yahoo! Groups Sponsor*
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129j4fok1/M=298184.5022502.6152625.3001176/D=groups/S=1707300337:HM/EXP=1088643671/A=2164339/R=0/SIG=11e2d64in/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60183348>
>
>
> ————————————————————————
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 13 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 13 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 601 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 602 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 603 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 604 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Archons awesome too.
Group: runacc Message: 605 From: Tina Connell Date: 4/30/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 606 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/30/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 607 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 608 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 609 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 610 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 611 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 612 From: martingear Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 613 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/4/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 614 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Pointer Revision
Group: runacc Message: 615 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 616 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 617 From: martingear Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 618 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 619 From: David Doering Date: 5/12/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 620 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/13/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 621 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/13/2004
Subject: CC26? at BayCon, 5/28/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 622 From: davedoering Date: 5/17/2004
Subject: Installment Plans
Group: runacc Message: 623 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/17/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 624 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Installment Plans
Group: runacc Message: 625 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
Group: runacc Message: 626 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Installment Plans
Group: runacc Message: 627 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: CC Multi-Flyer Prototype suggestion
Group: runacc Message: 628 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/25/2004
Subject: Email Pointer Revisions
Group: runacc Message: 629 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/4/2004
Subject: CC26? at Reno Coronation, 6/19/2004, 12:00 am
Group: runacc Message: 630 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/8/2004
Subject: Fwd: [cc23] ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 631 From: David Doering Date: 6/8/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 632 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/9/2004
Subject: Re: Big convetions, was: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 633 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/9/2004
Subject: Re: Big convetions, was: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 634 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 635 From: David Doering Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 636 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 637 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 638 From: martingear Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 639 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/11/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 640 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/12/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 641 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/12/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount
Group: runacc Message: 642 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/13/2004
Subject: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 643 From: Karen Heim Date: 6/13/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 644 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 645 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 646 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 647 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! Nora’s Flyer
Group: runacc Message: 648 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 649 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Group: runacc Message: 650 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/15/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 601 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Ah. John’s a good choice. I was very imipressed with his knowledge when I
first saw him at a panel at Chicon in 1991(?)

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Costuming GOHs

> On Apr 28, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > I was Fan GOH of WesterCon in 1989 based mainly on my costuming. Does
> > that
> > mean they should count? (Andy probably has a better grasp of how
> > costumer-friendly the con is now.)
>
> WesterCon, like WorldCon, depends entirely upon the committee putting
> it on. There is the strong traditional support for Masquerade, but some
> years that might be it. This year the head of programming just happens
> to be the president of SWCG and the FanGOH is John Hertz, so it’s going
> to be a very costume-friendly con.
>
> As for the Fan GOH question… regardless of the membership, any
> convention that picks costumers as FanGOHs regularly is worth
> cultivating a relationship with.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
> http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
> “Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
> — Donna Barr
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 602 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

I would assume so. The key is finding out if they’re still bringing in
costuming-type GOHs.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Costuming GOHs

> Arisia and Lunacon do, but it varies from year to year, depending on who’s
> on the committee and pushing for it.
>
> Ditto Balticon.
>
> I was Fan GOH of WesterCon in 1989 based mainly on my costuming. Does that
> mean they should count? (Andy probably has a better grasp of how
> costumer-friendly the con is now.)
>
> –Karen
>
> At 06:07 PM 4/28/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> >That one we knew. What other cons (in any state) regularly have Costuming
> >GOHs? Our regional, Archon, has for several years now. What others?
> >
> >Nora
> >—– Original Message —–
> >From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> > > Julie Zetterberg is Costume GOH at MarCon (Memorial Day Weekend) this
> > > year. She’s going to be taking some of our fliers and award ribbons
> > > with her.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 603 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

On Apr 29, 2004, at 6:05 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I think that Andy’s probably right about the whole FGOH vx. CGOH
> thing. So
> the question becomes, outside of having a friendly commmittee, how do
> we
> get more cons to recognize the value of a costuming guest?

Fan GoH selection is perhaps the most mystical of committee processes.
Damned if I know how it really works.

In the really old days (and I’m going on hearsay here) it was often
based on a desire to bring in some big name fanzine writer/publisher
from outside the area, ‘cuz cons were a way for fanzine fans to get
together.

These days, it seems to be more about one’s service to the convention,
the regional community or fandom as a whole. Some conventions
(WorldCon, particularly) have arcane traditions surrounding
eligibility. Some conventions pick their Fan GoH by random drawing.
Some conventions are only concerned about a candidate’s SMOF resume.

So to answer the original question: “Ask committee members (more than
one, ideally) how the con selects a Fan GoH, and what criteria are
important.”

If you can get a straight answer on this (and I’m not going to
guarantee that’s going to happen, some committees don’t want people to
know how they make these decisions) you may be able to suggest
candidates that are to their liking.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 604 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Archons awesome too.
Hammer away,
we’ve never heard anything but good news about Archon.

As soon as it’s not in the Halloween season, we’ll be there 🙂

Ricky

Halloween season definition, Sept15th to November 15th
sept 15th to oct fist weekend, finish building and going gray.
first weekend till Nov 1 open and perform,
Nov 2nd till Nov 15th, drink, sleep, lather rinse repeat.

 

Group: runacc Message: 605 From: Tina Connell Date: 4/30/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Betsy said:
I heard a hot rumor (unsubstantiated) that the Hunt Valley will be
taking Balticon back in the near future. If that’s the case, we may
start attending on a regular basis again.

The move downtown was a significant factor in Byron & me deciding to drop
Balticon from our con list. It’s a longish drive for us anyway, now that
we’re not as young as we were, and we typically used to get to Maryland at
around rush hour, so the move added at least an hour to the drive. We also
have no great desire to stay at the Omni – we never have stayed there, but
the feedback we have heard from others is discouraging, to say the least.
On the other hand, we really liked the Hunt Valley venue, and a move back
there might lure us, especially if the author GOH is interesting (who says
costumers don’t read?).

Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 606 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/30/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

In a message dated 4/29/2004 8:37:30 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> but you ain’t been to Archon yet….

Ditto!
The Archon crew was also the crew at the last ChiCon.

And what is dumbfounding to me is that Archon is about the same size as
WindyCon in Chicago, and the attitudes towards the masquerade from one to the other
is light day to night. The Archon Masquerade rocks! Whereas WindyCon . . .

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 607 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

These are all very logical ideas, which I think we should work to implement.
I know that we already carry multiple fliers to every con we attend, and
fliers covering multiple cons is an even better use of our luggage space.

Elaine

>
>Still on the theme of PR:
>I’ve got the germ of an idea that I’d like to put out here and get some
>help
>refining.
>Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
>geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the same
>cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones? Couldn’t
>a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs
>
>PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more extensive
>interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and efforts.
>Here’s some thoughts:
>1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the
>others;
>maybe bids as well.
>2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
>Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”
>3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
>expensive.
>
>In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using each
>other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event. Obviously
>each
>group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why not
>piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider
>benefits.
>Nora
>

_________________________________________________________________
Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 608 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

We have begun targeting period dance groups. Also, don’t forget living
history groups and college/high school drama groups.

Elaine

>> > Now, what further steps can we take to attract costumers from venues
>>other
> > than SF cons?
>

_________________________________________________________________
Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 609 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Betsy,

PLEASE don’t refer to costumers as “non-readers!” I think Bob Silverberg
learned that lesson the hard way!!

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.

>I think that you’re right – the perception is frequently that costumers
>aren’t “real” fen, because they devote their free time to something
>other than reading.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page � FREE
download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 610 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

This cross marketing is something Karen and I were talking about with a
few on this list at CC-22.

We will asap be starting to brand the CC name in general. CC as an umbrella
org type thing will have it’s own logo, images etc ( That each con com can
use or not use as they see fit as part of the licensing)

Our goal is to increase awareness of the con as an entity regardless of
location, but to send people to the website, which then also directs them
to each individual convention.

Ricky

At 10:04 AM 5/3/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>These are all very logical ideas, which I think we should work to implement.
> I know that we already carry multiple fliers to every con we attend, and
>fliers covering multiple cons is an even better use of our luggage space.
>
>Elaine
>
> >
> >Still on the theme of PR:
> >I’ve got the germ of an idea that I’d like to put out here and get some
> >help
> >refining.
> >Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
> >geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the same
> >cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones? Couldn’t
> >a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs
> >
> >PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more extensive
> >interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and efforts.
> >Here’s some thoughts:
> >1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the
> >others;
> >maybe bids as well.
> >2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
> >Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”
> >3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
> >expensive.
> >
> >In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using each
> >other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event. Obviously
> >each
> >group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why not
> >piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider
> >benefits.
> >Nora
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 611 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Sorry – that isn’t *my* attitude. Check my library sometime for reasons
why *I* don’t think this applies.

You’re preaching to the choir here.

-b

Elaine Mami wrote:

> Betsy,
>
> PLEASE don’t refer to costumers as “non-readers!” I think Bob Silverberg
> learned that lesson the hard way!!
>
> Elaine
>
> Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>I think that you’re right – the perception is frequently that costumers
>>aren’t “real” fen, because they devote their free time to something
>>other than reading.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – FREE
> download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 612 From: martingear Date: 5/3/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

This will, of course, help to establish the “National Organization”
whose contract we are submitting to hotels. 😉

^M^

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>This cross marketing is something Karen and I were talking about with a
>few on this list at CC-22.
>
>We will asap be starting to brand the CC name in general. CC as an umbrella
>org type thing will have it’s own logo, images etc ( That each con com can
>use or not use as they see fit as part of the licensing)
>
>Our goal is to increase awareness of the con as an entity regardless of
>location, but to send people to the website, which then also directs them
>to each individual convention.
>
>Ricky
>
>
>
>
>At 10:04 AM 5/3/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>These are all very logical ideas, which I think we should work to implement.
>> I know that we already carry multiple fliers to every con we attend, and
>>fliers covering multiple cons is an even better use of our luggage space.
>>
>>Elaine
>>
>>
>>
>>>Still on the theme of PR:
>>>I’ve got the germ of an idea that I’d like to put out here and get some
>>>help
>>>refining.
>>>Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
>>>geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the same
>>>cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones? Couldn’t
>>>a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs
>>>
>>>PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more extensive
>>>interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and efforts.
>>>Here’s some thoughts:
>>>1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the
>>>others;
>>>maybe bids as well.
>>>2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
>>>Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”
>>>3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
>>>expensive.
>>>
>>>In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using each
>>>other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event. Obviously
>>>each
>>>group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why not
>>>piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider
>>>benefits.
>>>Nora
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 613 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/4/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

On Apr 28, 2004, at 5:01 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using
> each
> other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event.

I’ve uploaded my CC26 flyer updates.
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/CC26.Fliers.pdf
(warning… adding the 4-up layouts kicked it to 3.5mb, so it’s going
to take a bit to download)

There are a few color changes (black-outlined gray text in the headline
for better contrast when printed in b/w).

There are several fliers that focus on the history and continuity of
Costume-Con, and all fliers emphasize this is Costume-Con ###26###
we’re bidding for. We usually bring copies of one focused and one
general flier to a convention, and carry a pocketful of the
quarter-pages to give out when we give out ribbons.

Last page is the cover-letter for our hotel/organization resume.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 614 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Pointer Revision
Hi, folks!

You may get this message more than once – I’ll try not to spam too many
times, but I’m trying to get the word out.

This is our first official announcement: We’re moving!

On May 17, 2004 we settle on our new house. Please revise your pointers
as follows:

Dan, Betsy, Erin and Katie Delaney
Hawkeswood House
13213 D’Angelo Drive
Bowie, MD 20720-4727
301-464-1511 (h)
301-922-1865 (w- Betsy)
703-428-4795 (w- Dan)

Our PO Box address will also change soon, but I don’t have the info yet.

The majority of our stuff moves in on 5/21 (courtesy of Beltway Movers).

Anyone with time to spare for un/packing assistance will be received
gratefully. We shouldn’t need moving help this time. We think…

Thanks!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 615 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Uh-oh
I’m scrambling now, after I receive this today. I’m still hoping we can
work something out:

Dear Mr. Mai:

Thank you for your interest in securing space for “Costume Con 25” at the
Holiday Inn Southwest & Viking Conference Center in March of 2007. We all
certainly appreciate the opportunity to do so.

After our initial meetings, we determined that the Holiday Inn Southwest
would be able to accommodate your group based on number of guest rooms
required and the amount of meeting space needed. After reviewing the sample
contract, we have determined that we will not be able to accommodate
“Costume Con 25”. There were several contract issues that the Holiday Inn
Southwest cannot fulfill, such as 24 hour restaurant/room service, amount of
power required in the main ballroom, party and non-party floors, dress code
for Sunday Brunch, 24 hour maintenance personnel on site, ability to control
the price and stocking of Coca Cola’s soda machines, congregating in
corridors, plus a few other minor points. The “ConSuite” would not be
available for Sunday due to the Sunday Brunch Buffet that needs to be set in
that room.

Again, all of us here at the Holiday Inn Southwest appreciate the
opportunity. I would certainly assist in helping you locate another
facility in St. Louis if you would like. If you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to contact me or my General Manager, Bill Banmiller at
314-821-6600.

 

Group: runacc Message: 616 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

On May 11, 2004, at 4:51 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> There were several contract issues that the Holiday Inn
> Southwest cannot fulfill, such as 24 hour restaurant/room service

Negotiable. Late restaurant hours and room service may be sufficient.

> amount of power required in the main ballroom

Probably not negotiable, but review with your tech crew; they may offer
a revision. On the other hand, we saw what a blown circuit breaker did
at ChiCon 2k.

> party and non-party floors

Probably negotiable; CC doesn’t usually have room parties outside the
ConSuite, but physical blocking of convention members would be very
valuable anyway.

> dress code for Sunday Brunch

Bullshit. Negotiable, though, if regular restaurant service is
available at full staffing levels too.

> 24 hour maintenance personnel on site

Negotiable, but only so far. Electrician on site while tech is set up
and during the shows is necessary. 24 hour maintenance on call with a
30 minute response time, including a backup electrician in case the
on-site electrician has a heart attack. Penalties for late response.
Kevin can tell you about hotwiring the Santa Clara Marriott at CC12
because one of their electricians was in the hospital and the other was
out of town.

> ability to control the price and stocking of Coca Cola’s soda machines

Negotiable. Price isn’t probably within your reach, but stocking could
be. Ask them to take the stocking request to their Coca Cola
distributor to sign off on.

> congregating in corridors, plus a few other minor points.

Not negotiable; include when talking about the physical blocking
request.

> The “ConSuite” would not be available for Sunday due to the Sunday
> Brunch Buffet that needs to be set in that room.

Not negotiable, assuming there isn’t a different suitable room
available. Are they only considering ballroom space? Is there a
boardroom or suite that would work?

You’ve still got talking points, so it could still be a go. Power,
consuite, and physical blocking could all be deal-killers, though.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 617 From: martingear Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

Dear Bruce –
Obviously some of their concerns could have been negotiated away e.g.
the 24 hour restaurant/room service or the coke machines, but isn’t it
good to know that they couldn’t give you the power you need, or the con
suite, or the ability to “gather”, now instead of at the con? I’m sorry
that your first choice of hotels didn’t work out, but you have shown why
something like the draft contract is so important for conventions such
as Costume Con..

Marty

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>I’m scrambling now, after I receive this today. I’m still hoping we can
>work something out:
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 618 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/11/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

At 06:51 PM 5/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>I’m scrambling now, after I receive this today. I’m still hoping we can
>work something out.

Bruce, are there any other suitable hotels in the area? Sounds like you
need a backup plan.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 619 From: David Doering Date: 5/12/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

>Bruce:

Andy wrote: “Power, consuite, and physical blocking could all be
deal-killers, though.”

I agree. Painful as it is to consider right now, it is better to find out
about what the hotel really has to offer before you get too far down the road.

How well you can do the masquerades, having a con suite on Sunday, and such
are all things that your members are going to remember a long time. If they
go wrong, you get the blame. Things like coke machines not working are seen
as the hotel’s problem and less the fault of the con.

Dave Doering

 

Group: runacc Message: 620 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/13/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

In a message dated 5/11/2004 6:50:51 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> I’m scrambling now, after I receive this today. I’m still hoping we can
> work something out:

Bruce,
That’s falls into my “Oh cr-p” category. The first hotel we had lined
up for CC21 told us that they couldn’t hold the ballrooms for more than a day,
plus the airport limo was $25 or so, one way, if it was there!
Good luck!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 621 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/13/2004
Subject: CC26? at BayCon, 5/28/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at BayCon


Friday May 28, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.


Event Location: San Jose, CA

Notes:
Bid Party Friday night, award ribbons



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 622 From: davedoering Date: 5/17/2004
Subject: Installment Plans
I was looking at Noreascon’s membership installment plan, which they
say has proven popular (no surprise with memberships running $180.00
right now).

Although our <$100 memberships aren’t as large as WorldCon’s, what is
everyone’s opinion on offering a CC installment plan? Would this
attract more memberships?

Or is it just another hassle?

Dave Doering

 

Group: runacc Message: 623 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/17/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh
I believe we are back on track now — at least until we can acutally sit
down with the Sales Manager and see if we can work out an arrangement, but a
backup plan is in order….

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 624 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Installment Plans

In a message dated 5/17/2004 9:06:27 PM Central Daylight Time,
dave@techvoice.com writes:

> what is
> everyone’s opinion on offering a CC installment plan?

Dave,
I think we were asked if we, meaning CC21, would do that. We said
sure. We didn’t advertise it, but if someone asked, we would. We thought money is
money. There are some people, like myself, who get lucky and manage to scrape
the money together to go to CC.
One other thing that we considered was enabling membership payment via
PayPal. I can’t remember why we didn’t do it, but we didn’t.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 625 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Uh-oh

In a message dated 5/17/2004 9:59:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> I believe we are back on track now

Bruce,
Yippee for your CC!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 626 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: Re: Installment Plans

At 08:59 PM 5/17/2004, you wrote:

>I was looking at Noreascon’s membership installment plan, which they
>say has proven popular (no surprise with memberships running $180.00
>right now).
>
>Although our <$100 memberships aren’t as large as WorldCon’s, what is
>everyone’s opinion on offering a CC installment plan? Would this
>attract more memberships?
>
>Or is it just another hassle?

I don’t know that we really need to worry about this unless you’re getting
requests or rumors that people can’t afford the rate at one time. If we
start getting over $100 per membership, it might be in order. Otherwise I
think it is a hassle. (and we’re fans of the concept for Worldcon though we
don’t use it ourselves. )

P&S

>Dave Doering

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 627 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2004
Subject: CC Multi-Flyer Prototype suggestion
I’ve uploaded a file to the files portion for this group. Please check it
out. It is a starting point only, but a suggestion as to how we might
feasibly generate a multi-convention flyer for CCs.
Pierre has pointed out to us that there are a large number of conventions
upcoming for the Memorial Day weekend that he feels we might want to send
flyers to. But at 3 years out we find it hard to justify the cost of sending
flyers to all of them for the next three years (as well as all the other
cons throughout the year) even if we only sent 20 – 25 per con.
A group flyer would benefit all planned CCs and planned bids as well as
supply general info to a larger audience.
Thoughts?

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 628 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/25/2004
Subject: Email Pointer Revisions
Hi, folks!

We’re almost done with the move (and an ugly one it has been, too!).

In the process, I’ve determined that my “betsy” account has got to go
away. I’m being spammed to death.

If you want our new snail contact info, send me email. You can reach
me at brdelaney at hawkeswood, instead of betsy. Repeat the address as a
real email address in email at your peril! Really. I used to include my
address in my .sig. No more. Note that the r isn’t a typo. If you want
me to really see your email fast, use the r.

And watch this space for an announcement of the next ICG Newsletter
collating party, coming soon to a mailing list (and a new house in Bowie
MD) near you!

See some of you at Balticon on Saturday (though I have *no* idea what
I’m going to wear!)

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 629 From: runacc@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/4/2004
Subject: CC26? at Reno Coronation, 6/19/2004, 12:00 am

Reminder Reminder from
the Calendar of runacc

CC26? at Reno Coronation


Saturday June 19, 2004
All Day

This event does not repeat.

Notes:
Award Ribbons & Fliers



Yahoo! Greetings

Send a Yahoo! Greeting.

Birthday Reminders

Set up birthday reminders!

Copyright ©
2004
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

 


 
Group: runacc Message: 630 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/8/2004
Subject: Fwd: [cc23] ICG Discount

(sent to CC23-staff, but forwarded here for obvious reasons)

On Jun 7, 2004, at 4:01 PM, David Doering wrote:
> 2. Since Costume Con is ostensibly for _all_ costumers, offering an
> exclusive to the ICG would appear biased against other, just as worthy,
> costuming groups.

Let’s see if I can comment on this in a clear fashion, and in a much
more generic sense…

Member discounts are usually offered when the conference is being put
on by a sponsoring club.

Large national conferences and regional conferences where there aren’t
other organizations putting on complimentary or competing conferences
in the same area often offer discounted fees to their members, and only
their members.

In this case, there are two reasons for offering the discounts. The
first, marketing the conference to club members, is usually the lesser.
The second, marketing club membership to non-member attendees, is
usually the big deal. It’s almost always about increasing club
membership.

Regional and local events often offer “reciprocal member discounts”
where a group of clubs agree to offer discounts to members of all clubs
in the group. This is particularly common when multiple organizations
in an area offer complimentary events.

Again the reasons: Marketing to club members, but again not that big of
a deal. Marketing the club to non-member attendees is still a big deal.
Fostering goodwill with other clubs and marketing to their members is
the really big deal, though. Reciprocal discounts is a way to get
different clubs working together and supporting each others’ events.

So here’s a few examples:
The SCA offers steep member discounts to attend Pennsic war. This is a
tool to increase membership (you can buy a membership on-site for less
than the discount rate) and manage liability (since some of the
insurance is paid for out of membership fees).

Here in the Bay Area, PEERS (a vintage dance group) offers reciprocal
discounts to GBACG members for their events. There are a ton of costume
events around here, and a lot of work goes into ensuring that clubs
support one another’s events.

Costume-Con doesn’t necessarily fit either of these models well.
Costume-Con may be sponsored by a guild chapter, or it may not be.
Costume-Con may take place in a region where lots of clubs organize
costume events, or it may not.

I don’t see ICG member discounts at CC increasing CC attendance. It’s
also much trickier selling ICG memberships at a CC since the
organization is structured geographically (SiW notwithstanding), though
you could just sell Utah memberships to folks who wanted the discount
on-site (but the non-member surcharge would have to be enough to make
this desirable).

There’s also the basic accounting issue. Complicating the registration
fee options is just that, and requires additional cost accounting to
review and adjust the basic price points. Last thing you need right
now, particularly if you’ve already published rates.

I’m with Karen and Ricky on this one. I say give everybody a quality
conference at a low price, and screw the discounts.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 631 From: David Doering Date: 6/8/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

>Andy wrote: “Costume-Con doesn’t necessarily fit either of these models well.
>Costume-Con may be sponsored by a guild chapter, or it may not be.
>Costume-Con may take place in a region where lots of clubs organize
>costume events, or it may not.”

The contrast between how Costume-Con and Costume College works (both with
discounts and with marketing) is quite similar to a comparison of the
WorldCon with the San Diego Comic-Con.

I have had a very similar discussion about this issue with John Rogers who
heads up the Comic-Con. John’s event far surpasses any other fannish
gathering in size, programming, and impact, even though the WorldCon
purports to be THE event for SF/F fandom. So I asked him why. He thinks
that World Con is so small in comparison because it is poorly run and promoted.

His remedy? Have the same committee run the event year-to-year and host it
in only a few select sites.

This would please dealers, movie studios, and book publishers who would all
welcome such a change (and the professionalism that such a permanent
committee would bring to the event).

As you might imagine, though, fandom is not amenable to letting some type
of WorldCon, Inc. take charge of the event.

In the same way I do not believe that we will have a central “Costume Con,
Inc.” to run the event. Given the volunteer nature of each year’s con-com,
it is a challenge to put together a “quality conference at a low price”.

Andy wrote: “Last thing you need right now, particularly if you’ve already
published rates.”

But not necessarily a bad idea for CC25 or 26 to consider.

>Andy wrote: “I say give everybody a quality conference at a low price…”

Ultimately, this IS the answer to CCs succeeding in the future. Given a
great venue, good competitions, and such, and people will attend. The
challenge for us is how to balance this.

Dave Doering
CC23

 

Group: runacc Message: 632 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/9/2004
Subject: Re: Big convetions, was: ICG Discount

I think Comic-Con is something different than just a big-well-run SF con. (although I have not been there.) First off, World-con IS pretty well known, inside fandom, so I don’t think it has a publicity problem. And fans and vendors don’t avoid World-con because it is not well organized. (Well, they still seem to be able to get vendors.) But Comic Con does two things — it manages to tap into media fandom, and it is located in a large metropolitan area. I don’t think Comic-con would be as successful if it were located in Utah, even if it were run the same. I also think the media con in Denver, is larger than Denver’s SF con.

There may be ways to improve World-con, and perhaps make it larger in the process, but I agree that it is not likely to be by the method suggested.

Charles
CC23

—– Original Message —–
From: David Doering
<snip>
His remedy? Have the same committee run the event year-to-year and host it
in only a few select sites.
<snip>

Dave Doering
CC23

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 633 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/9/2004
Subject: Re: Big convetions, was: ICG Discount

We’re talking pro-run vs. fan-run conventions here, which are two VERY
different animals.

And that on top of one convention staying in one place with committee
continuity from year to year and the other convention changing
cities/countries and committees every year. Has to have an impact.

As a side note, I worked registration for the San Diego Comic-Con in 1973
and 1974, back when they were hard-pressed to draw 300 people, LOL!

–Karen

At 09:39 AM 6/9/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>I think Comic-Con is something different than just a big-well-run SF
>con. (although I have not been there.) First off, World-con IS pretty
>well known, inside fandom, so I don’t think it has a publicity
>problem. And fans and vendors don’t avoid World-con because it is not
>well organized. (Well, they still seem to be able to get vendors.) But
>Comic Con does two things — it manages to tap into media fandom, and it
>is located in a large metropolitan area. I don’t think Comic-con would be
>as successful if it were located in Utah, even if it were run the same. I
>also think the media con in Denver, is larger than Denver’s SF con.
>
>There may be ways to improve World-con, and perhaps make it larger in the
>process, but I agree that it is not likely to be by the method suggested.
>
>Charles
>CC23
> —– Original Message —–
> From: David Doering
> <snip>
> His remedy? Have the same committee run the event year-to-year and host it
> in only a few select sites.
> <snip>
>
> Dave Doering
> CC23
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>——————————————————————————
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 634 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

At 08:44 PM 6/8/2004, you wrote:

It should also be noted that most of the SMOFS (which make up a large part
of the Permanent Rotating Worldcon Committee) are utterly opposed to
increasing the size of Worldcon. For them it is philosophical. The large
size of Comic-Con or Dragon-Con is antithetical to their underlying
convention mentality.

Many fans have complained about the cost of membership in a Worldcon. Not
long ago, Kevin Standlee noted that if Worldcon could increase its
membership to just 10,000, the same facilities we use now would be able to
handle the membership and membership cost could drop by 33-50%. He was
practically howled off the SMOF list for the temerity.

Pierre

>I have had a very similar discussion about this issue with John Rogers who
>heads up the Comic-Con. John’s event far surpasses any other fannish
>gathering in size, programming, and impact, even though the WorldCon
>purports to be THE event for SF/F fandom. So I asked him why. He thinks
>that World Con is so small in comparison because it is poorly run and
>promoted.
>
>His remedy? Have the same committee run the event year-to-year and host it
>in only a few select sites.
>
>This would please dealers, movie studios, and book publishers who would all
>welcome such a change (and the professionalism that such a permanent
>committee would bring to the event).
>
>As you might imagine, though, fandom is not amenable to letting some type
>of WorldCon, Inc. take charge of the event.

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 635 From: David Doering Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

>Pierre wrote: “…to increasing the size of Worldcon. For them it is
>philosophical.”

Exactly my point. The decision has been made to keep the Con as it is,
rather than morph it into something other. Hence Costume College is what it
is and Costume Con is something different.

We do NOT want a permanent CC, Inc. controlling the event nor do we want to
fix it to one city.

Given that, we face in microcosm the problem the WorldCon faces–being too
small to attract the better hotels/convention centers–hence having to go
to suburban cities which are less populated with costumers, thus having
less of a budget to try to build the event, etc.

Dave D.

 

Group: runacc Message: 636 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

At 05:18 PM 6/9/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>Not long ago, Kevin Standlee noted that if Worldcon could increase its
>membership to just 10,000, the same facilities we use now would be able to
>handle the membership and membership cost could drop by 33-50%. He was
>practically howled off the SMOF list for the temerity.

Is this where I mention that running a 10,000+ person event has its own
peculiar set of logistical problems, even though it might occupy the same
facilities? I’ve never been to Dragoncon, but have experienced the San
Diego Comic Con as it first started to experience explosive growth, the
1984 Worldcon in Los Angeles, and a whole bunch of STAR TREK and STAR WARS
conventions in the ’70’s that totally overwhelmed their facilities.

I also don’t see why we are discussing this here, as I strongly doubt
Costume-Con will EVER reach that size due to its specialized nature and
other factors (geographic rotation and new committee each year) we have
discussed here and on the CC-23 list. I would be thrilled to see consistent
attendance of 500 at CC, let alone 1,000 or more.

Yes, Costume-Con, like many fannish conventions, takes a lot of function
space in proportion to its membership size. That’s the nature of the beast,
and something each committee wrestles with each year. But its small size
gives it a personalized feel and a sense of community (and being able to
know everyone) that you would not get with a HUGE convention.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 637 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

On Jun 10, 2004, at 8:24 AM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I also don’t see why we are discussing this here, as I strongly doubt
> Costume-Con will EVER reach that size due to its specialized nature and
> other factors (geographic rotation and new committee each year) we have
> discussed here and on the CC-23 list. I would be thrilled to see
> consistent
> attendance of 500 at CC, let alone 1,000 or more.

I don’t think anybody is worried about the 10k issue specifically.

I’m interested in examining the decisions that different cons made to
be/remain the size they are, and what they gained or lost by those
decisions.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 638 From: martingear Date: 6/10/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

Andrew T Trembley wrote:
<snip>

>I’m interested in examining the decisions that different cons made to
>be/remain the size they are, and what they gained or lost by those
>decisions.
>
>I don’t think anybody is worried about the 10k issue specifically.
>

Because Yahoo Groups was playing games again, I missed out on the
beginning of this discussion, but I think that the problem is that
beyond a certain size you cannot run a successful convention only with
volunteer help working on a part time basis. That means that at some
point someone has to make the decision to make the convention a
commercial venture so that it can have at least a core staff of full
time paid workers. Once that decision is made you have a “whole ‘nother
animal” and the most practical way to do this is with a For Profit
(anathema to most fans) corporation. Once you decide that, the
character of the event changes (not always for the worst.)

I have no idea what that magic size is, but I know that the Baltimore
Worldcon in 1998 had about 5,000 people. I was in charge of
“Facilities” (hotels & convention center) with the volunteer assistance
of two lawyers, one who works for the IRS and the other who is a
Baltimore real estate lawyer, and three of the most competent young
ladies that I have ever known. I also know that I personally lost in
excess of $20,000 a year in commercial business because of the time
that I had to spend on the Worldcon Facilities activities in 1997 and
1998. If you think that I’d be willing to do that again, the answer is
not unless I win a majorly big lottery, or a con were willing to pay me
at least that amount plus my expenses. Multiply that by the various
other major activities (programming, registration, publications etc.)
and you can see you are beginning to talk really large amounts of money
to do a large con professionally and successfully.

On the other hand, I’ve already volunteered to do Facilities for a
Costume Con that will probably top out at 500 people, and I really don’t
expect that it will cost me 1/20th of what BucCONeer did. I handled
facilities for Balticon for about 10 years, and after the first year
spent establishing a good working relationship with the hotel I don’t
think that I spent over about 30 or 40 hours a year total , and a good
part of that was beating up on the con committee to get me their
information in a timely manner. That was for a 1,500-1,800 person
convention, held in a single hotel in the same city each year.

my $0.02

Marty

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 639 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/11/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

In a message dated 6/10/2004 6:16:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> I’m interested in examining the decisions that different cons made to
> be/remain the size they are, and what they gained or lost by those
> decisions.

Andy,
Some of the cons I have either seen or gone to have either plateaued
and just stayed there, or made a decision to be a certain size, which I view as
silly. Some others have not tried hard enough to be bigger. I wish I had
worked harder at making CC21 bigger. Some cons have a good reputation, like a
WorldCom in L.A. They always have a larger than normal for a WorldCom attendance.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 640 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/12/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

At 10:24 AM 6/10/2004, you wrote:

>I also don’t see why we are discussing this here, as I strongly doubt
>Costume-Con will EVER reach that size due to its specialized nature and
>other factors (geographic rotation and new committee each year) we have
>discussed here and on the CC-23 list. I would be thrilled to see consistent
>attendance of 500 at CC, let alone 1,000 or more.

Actually, my point was only in reference to the “suggestion” from the
Comic-Con person that a paid staff and limited sites would help us keep
numbers up. Mostly it was an anecdote on this general topic.

I think increasing the size of CCis a good thing, up to about 600 or so.
The near 900 @ CC8 was impressive, but a bit overwhelming. I remember being
a bit perturbed at not recognizing a majority of the membership.

I think we should learn things from the marketing angle that have resulted
in very populous CCs, though watch ourselves that we’re not overwhelmed.

Pierre

>Yes, Costume-Con, like many fannish conventions, takes a lot of function
>space in proportion to its membership size. That’s the nature of the beast,
>and something each committee wrestles with each year. But its small size
>gives it a personalized feel and a sense of community (and being able to
>know everyone) that you would not get with a HUGE convention.
>
>–Karen

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 641 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/12/2004
Subject: Re: ICG Discount

At 03:46 PM 6/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>I think increasing the size of CCis a good thing, up to about 600 or so.

The 500 and 600 person CC’s seem to be less financial wear and tear on
their committees, which would be a Good Thing.

>The near 900 @ CC8 was impressive, but a bit overwhelming. I remember being
>a bit perturbed at not recognizing a majority of the membership.

I didn’t mind seeing the new faces so much, but the hotel was chosen on the
basis of CC-6’s membership 2 years prior, and was completely overwhelmed by
the influx of so many additonal people. If memory serves me, they
eventually had to close registration because the panel rooms were so badly
overcrowded.

Although CC-8 wasn’t as bad as the first STAR TREK convention I went to
(1973). They were expecting 1500 people and got 10,000. Talk about a
logistics nightmare!

>I think we should learn things from the marketing angle that have resulted
>in very populous CCs, though watch ourselves that we’re not overwhelmed.

Another factor may be that the very populous cons are held in very populous
states / cities, so there are more interested people to draw from. And
fannish costumers have always seemed to be more active on both coasts vs.
the MidWest, even before Costume-Con was formed, especially with media
recreation cotumes. The new fad would hit (Battlestar Galactica uniforms,
for example), and the Californians would have copies of it within weeks,
and the Boston and Baltimore crowd would have it 6 months later…and then
2 years later, it would finally trickle down to the center of the country.

–Karen

There’s definitely something to be said for a good marketing campaign,
though. Unfortunately, we also have negative examples (Costume-Cons who
bailed out early on publicity and paid a heavy price in attendance numbers.)

 

Group: runacc Message: 642 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/13/2004
Subject: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
All this theory is interesting discussion, but frankly, it’s a little ahead
of the game. Unless we begin promoting CC on a national level, attendance
is NOT going to get any better. Past CC attendance proves that.

Taking the initiative, Nora proposed a national flyer and posted it to the
Yahoo files more than three weeks ago. We’re both a bit puzzled by the lack
of ANY response by this list. C’mon folks, let’s stay stay focused.
Costume-Con is never going to GET any bigger if you don’t promote it. And I
don’t mean each of our cons doing it seperately.

If no one wants to do the work, then we’d better admit that
upfront and lower our expectations.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 643 From: Karen Heim Date: 6/13/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

As an addition to that, I continue to lament the lack of heavy promotion
and push for the Future Fashion Folio. This publication could be a
major marketing tool, but continues to be hampered by lack of support
WITHIN the current ICG community, much less getting the word out in a
timely manner to other groups.

Some people have stated in print that they do not approve of the way the
Folio has been evolving over the past few years. I have a number of
comments regarding that, but my bottom line is this: TOO BAD. If we
persist in old and inflexible notions about what “future fashions” look
like, we will drive away large sources of new people. Future fashion
isn’t just next century; it’s next month, next year. If we don’t intend
to adapt to make our venues appealing to more people, we should just
admit it and accept that we’re another marginalized geek clique. I
don’t accept it, and I will continue to fight that image.

Karen

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> All this theory is interesting discussion, but frankly, it’s a little
> ahead
> of the game. Unless we begin promoting CC on a national level, attendance
> is NOT going to get any better. Past CC attendance proves that.
>
> Taking the initiative, Nora proposed a national flyer and posted it to the
> Yahoo files more than three weeks ago. We’re both a bit puzzled by
> the lack
> of ANY response by this list. C’mon folks, let’s stay stay focused.
> Costume-Con is never going to GET any bigger if you don’t promote it.
> And I
> don’t mean each of our cons doing it seperately.
>
> If no one wants to do the work, then we’d better admit that
> upfront and lower our expectations.
>
> Bruce
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 644 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)
Bruce & Nora,
I’m sorry I missed that you posted the flyer. I will look at it this
morning.
I agree on your sentiment about attendance at CC’s. It does stay about
the same amount every year, within a certain variance. I believe that one of
the concepts of having a convention solely about costuming is to attract new
people and new ideas. The only way we are going to do that is by increasing the
number of people showing up. I believe that all the CC’s lined up in the
future could easily handle even 50 more people showing up. Of course, 100 would be
great, but even 50 is good.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 645 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

In a message dated 6/13/2004 5:43:54 PM Central Daylight Time,
axejudge@accessus.net writes:

> If we
> persist in old and inflexible notions about what “future fashions” look
> like, we will drive away large sources of new people.

Hear, Hear! Well put, Karen!

When I first got into the costuming crowd, I said that its biggest lesson is
“The world is malleable. Things can be changed.” Admittedly, I am still new on
the scene, but I still love doing things that people don’t think about.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 646 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

On Jun 13, 2004, at 2:44 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Taking the initiative, Nora proposed a national flyer and posted it to
> the
> Yahoo files more than three weeks ago. We’re both a bit puzzled by
> the lack
> of ANY response by this list. C’mon folks, let’s stay stay focused.
> Costume-Con is never going to GET any bigger if you don’t promote it.
> And I
> don’t mean each of our cons doing it seperately.

We’ve been passing out our “Mark Your Calendar” flyer that lists info
for CC23, CC24, CC25 and our proposed date for CC26 at every convention
we go to.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 647 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! Nora’s Flyer
I have downloaded it and looked it over. The basic form is good. A bunch of
fill-in-the-spot spots, but the basic layout is good.

Andy, have you made a tweaked up version?

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 648 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

On Jun 13, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Karen Heim wrote:

> As an addition to that, I continue to lament the lack of heavy
> promotion
> and push for the Future Fashion Folio. This publication could be a
> major marketing tool, but continues to be hampered by lack of support
> WITHIN the current ICG community, much less getting the word out in a
> timely manner to other groups.

We are where we are right now, but I personally would like to see the
Des Moines folio directors ramping up now to accept entries immediately
after the Utah folio entry period closes. It would be nice to include
in the Utah folio information on entering in the Des Moines contest. I
would like to see the Des Moines folio directors at Utah soliciting
entries in person, and at any other conventions afterwards they can
afford to make it to.

Folio release and CC are both times that there’s a lot of excitement
about the design competition, and may be a rich time to get new
entries.

We also need releases that make the folio and designs within easier to
use for marketing.

‘course, this has been said before and there’s every chance it’s
already in the works.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 649 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/14/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

Yes, and it has been pointed out that in doing FFF, that you are working with artists — Send the information out too early, and it gets lost, send it out too late, and there will not be enough time. So it turns out that the trick is to send out info early, send a reminder months before the dead-line, and then again, with enough weeks for the artists to finish. It is the process of matching the muse, with deadlines.

And in working with FFF for CC-23, it was again realized that there can be a number of issues involved, with artist’s protections, and publication, on-line, and in-print.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

On Jun 13, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Karen Heim wrote:
> As an addition to that, I continue to lament the lack of heavy
> promotion
> and push for the Future Fashion Folio. This publication could be a
> major marketing tool, but continues to be hampered by lack of support
> WITHIN the current ICG community, much less getting the word out in a
> timely manner to other groups.

We are where we are right now, but I personally would like to see the
Des Moines folio directors ramping up now to accept entries immediately
after the Utah folio entry period closes. It would be nice to include
in the Utah folio information on entering in the Des Moines contest. I
would like to see the Des Moines folio directors at Utah soliciting
entries in person, and at any other conventions afterwards they can
afford to make it to.

Folio release and CC are both times that there’s a lot of excitement
about the design competition, and may be a rich time to get new
entries.

We also need releases that make the folio and designs within easier to
use for marketing.

‘course, this has been said before and there’s every chance it’s
already in the works.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 650 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/15/2004
Subject: Re: PROMOTION!! (was Re: [runacc] ICG Discount)

At 07:36 PM 6/14/2004, you wrote:

>On Jun 13, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Karen Heim wrote:
> > As an addition to that, I continue to lament the lack of heavy
> > promotion
> > and push for the Future Fashion Folio. This publication could be a
> > major marketing tool, but continues to be hampered by lack of support
> > WITHIN the current ICG community, much less getting the word out in a
> > timely manner to other groups.
>
>We are where we are right now, but I personally would like to see the
>Des Moines folio directors ramping up now to accept entries immediately
>after the Utah folio entry period closes. It would be nice to include
>in the Utah folio information on entering in the Des Moines contest. I
>would like to see the Des Moines folio directors at Utah soliciting
>entries in person, and at any other conventions afterwards they can
>afford to make it to.

Actually, Andy, the CC24 folio rules have already been published. We can
take designs now, but obviously won’t be heavily promoting until after the
cc23’s folio ceases to accept entries. Sandy is the folio director for 24
and is planning some things for 23.

Pierre

>Folio release and CC are both times that there’s a lot of excitement
>about the design competition, and may be a rich time to get new
>entries.
>
>We also need releases that make the folio and designs within easier to
>use for marketing.
>
>’course, this has been said before and there’s every chance it’s
>already in the works.
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 12 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 12 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 551 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts
Group: runacc Message: 552 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Releases
Group: runacc Message: 553 From: martingear Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Releases
Group: runacc Message: 554 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 555 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Releases
Group: runacc Message: 556 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations
Group: runacc Message: 557 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations
Group: runacc Message: 558 From: martingear Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations
Group: runacc Message: 559 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 560 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 561 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Historical and Historical (was Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 562 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/20/2004
Subject: Re: Historical and Historical
Group: runacc Message: 563 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/20/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 564 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Group: runacc Message: 565 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Oh, so you’re not lost on this Imperial Court thing…
Group: runacc Message: 566 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Group: runacc Message: 567 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden
Group: runacc Message: 568 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden
Group: runacc Message: 569 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Group: runacc Message: 570 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Group: runacc Message: 571 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 572 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 573 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 574 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 575 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 576 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 577 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 578 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 579 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 580 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 581 From: martingear Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 582 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 583 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 584 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 585 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 586 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 587 From: martingear Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 588 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 589 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 590 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 591 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 592 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 593 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 594 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 595 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 596 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 597 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 598 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Group: runacc Message: 599 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Group: runacc Message: 600 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 551 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts

Good thoughts. I think what Dave siad was helpful, as well.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “martingear” <MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hotel Contracts

> Bruce –
> I’d be happy to read what the hotel has given you and give you my
> comments. Andy and David have pretty much given you the magic words.
> Telling the hotel that this is a national organization’s model contract
> tells the hotel that someone has dealt with hotels before and has gotten
> that agreement accepted. (True!) If the hotel balks then suggest that
> you start with the national contract and “tweak it” where necessary
> incorporating their concerns, but imply that you expect that the
> necessary changes will be minor. The contract is actually written
> fairly for both parties, and it does cover many of things that most
> hotels don’t even think about, but are very important to Costume Cons.
> If the hotel refuses absolutely to start with your contract then be
> afraid, very afraid. The fact that they have given you a proposal and
> you are now bringing in your own contract can be explained by telling
> the hotel that you have just returned from CC-22 where you won the bid
> and were given the model contract by the national organization. (O.K.,
> so you got it from me… pretend this once that I represent the national
> organization 🙂 )
>
> Marty
>
> Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
>
> >We have a CC25 committee meeting coming up this Saturday, and one of the
> >things we’ll be discussing with them is the hotel contract. I have the
> >hotel’s version (4 pages) and Marty’s epic <g>. I’d like to run the
> >proposal past Marty and others here who have had hotel experience and get
> >pointers. One of my main questions is: how do I work the CC contract
> >smoothly into the mix at this point, since we haven’t signed anything
yet,
> >but have their proposal in hand? If possible, I’d like to get feedback
> >before tomorrow Saturday evening.
> >
> >Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 552 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Releases
Have CCs in the past used general releases for entire convention or just the
masquerades?

Does anyone have any realiable info on people refusing to sign safety and
photography releases? How high an incidence is there?

Has there ever been a plan for dealing with anyone refusing to sign?

How appropriate would it be to state a release policy ahead of the
convention so that members know what they’re going to encounter (safety,
photography, video, etc.). Has this ever been done? Is it even nedessary?

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 553 From: martingear Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Releases

I believe that there was a group at CC-7 who refused to allow their hall
costumes to be photographed although I don’t remember their reasons
why. For all the convention masquerades that I have run, the policy has
been if you don’t sign the release (one for both photo and safety) you
don’t enter the masquerade and you don’t set foot on the stage. I can’t
remember anyone ever challanging that, although I do remember someone
who forged some signatures from her group. When we discovered that, we
caught them in the Green Room and had all group members sign which they
were quite willing to do.

In particular you have to have them sign the “hold harmless” or you are
leaving the con open for a massive law suit and it could well affect
your insurance coverage. No release protects you in cases of gross
negligence or deliberate unsafe practices, but it does prevent one from
sueing the convention or the venue if he steps blindly off the stage.
(He writes, speaking from experience.)

Marty

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>Have CCs in the past used general releases for entire convention or just the
>masquerades?
>
>Does anyone have any realiable info on people refusing to sign safety and
>photography releases? How high an incidence is there?
>
>Has there ever been a plan for dealing with anyone refusing to sign?
>
>How appropriate would it be to state a release policy ahead of the
>convention so that members know what they’re going to encounter (safety,
>photography, video, etc.). Has this ever been done? Is it even nedessary?
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 554 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

No problem, Marty–thanks for bringing this up. I guess it should be on the
“list of stuff to discus with the hotel.” I’m just trying to think of ways
we can conserve function space at future cons, as I know we are extremely
space intensive for the size of the con.

We’re looking at a Mariiott as a possibility for 30, so that’s a good
heads-up, too.

–Karen

At 05:50 PM 4/17/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>While I think that the concept of a “Dealers’ Row” is wonderful. (Love
>it at Arisia) some hotels will not approve. I ran into that at the
>Baltimore Marriott when we were looking at the possibility of moving
>Balticon there several year ago. I don’t want to throw cold water on
>the idea, just giving everyone a heads up.
>
>^M^
>
>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> >As a costume / corset dealer, I LOVE it. With a room with a bathroom,
> >people can try on stuff and not leave the dealer’s domain. (I still
> >recommend having more than one set of eyes to watch the room at any given
> >time.) I also like being able to set our own hours.
> >
> >I don’t know Devra all that well–anybody else have a closer relationship
> >where they could possibly ask?
> >
> >–Karen
> >
> >At 08:57 AM 4/17/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>And one further consideration in favor of this arrangement:
> >>
> >>Security becomes the problem of the dealers, not the conference.
> >>
> >>In a shared Dealer Room area, someone has to be sure that nothing walks
> >>overnight. You can plant someone in the room overnight for security, or
> >>hire someone to watch the space. I know we had some issues at CCXV, and
> >>I think there were also some problems with locks on the doors at CC22.
> >>
> >>I’d be interested in hearing what Devra Langsam might have to say about
> >>such an arrangement, since Poison Pen Press is more or less a fixture at
> >>CCs.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>Betsy
> >>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Future concoms should give some thought to handling dealers the way some
> >>>East Coast S/F and clown conventions are doing it lately: hotel rooms are
> >>>blocked into a “Dealer’s Row” on the same floor as, and preferably near,
> >>>the con suite. Dealers deal out of their hotel rooms, so they can set
> >>>
> >>>
> >>their
> >>
> >>
> >>>own hours (and maybe a dealer such as AlterYears would be able to get a
> >>>suite in order to maximize their space). Charge is a nominal fee over the
> >>>price of the hotel room so the con gets its cut.
> >>>
> >>>Most of these conventions have a regular dealer’s room as well, but I can
> >>>see advantages to going 100% to the Dealer’s Row format–it frees up
> >>>breakout rooms or ballroom space for other con programming. Since space is
> >>>usually at a premium at CC, this could be a Very Good Thing.
> >>>(Also solves the eternal problem of finding a space large enough for
> >>>AlterYears.)
> >>>
> >>>Ricky and I did the “Dealer’s Row” thing at Arisia and LunaCon this year,
> >>>and it was very successful, especially considering we were frequently
> >>>closed because we were on programming, in competitions, etc. It also gives
> >>>conventioneers something else to do late at night besides hanging out in
> >>>the con suite (sort of spreads the party around).
> >>>
> >>>Just a thought, as we’re all thinking about hotel contracts and trying to
> >>>get enough space, etc.
> >>>
> >>>–Karen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >>>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>–
> >>–
> >>Betsy R. Delaney
> >>Web Mistress at large
> >>
> >>************************************************************************
> >> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> >> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> >> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
> >>************************************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 555 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: Releases
Bruce,
We had a general release for all pictures at the taken at the con by
anybody. I can e-mail you a copy of it, if you would like.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 556 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations

Might this topic be appropriate on runacc?

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “J Price” <taknflyte@yahoo.com>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations

> I have to disagree with you, Karen. Key people do not
> need to be co-located, they just need to do their
> homework about the area, know what they’re doing and
> how to coordinate from a distance. That’s not to say
> the committee is running with whatever the pig in the
> poke ends up being. Consistent and regular contact is
> mandated and site visits are a necessity. Probably
> wouldn’t be a hardship though, expecially if one were
> looking at locations like Las Vegas or New Orleans or
> similar.
>
> However, I think it’s a better discussion off list
> between people who might have an interest. =)
>
> JP
>
> — Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com> wrote:
> > I’m with Carole, and I’ve mostly seen it be a total
> > disaster. You need some
> > key people on the ground in the area (hotel liaison,
> > exhibit room, dealer
> > room, and an events coordinator)–other departments
> > are plug-and-play
> > (green room, fashion folio/show).
> >
> > –Karen
> >
> > At 11:27 PM 4/16/2004 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Definitely not quoting the Worldcon
> > > > model but I’ve been involved in successful
> > smaller
> > > > conventions where members of the committee did
> > not
> > > > live anywhere near the actual site.
> > >
> > >I’ve seen that work, and I’ve seen it be a total
> > disaster. For it to
> > >work really requires the right people.
> > >
> > >Until later–
> > >
> > >Carole

 

Group: runacc Message: 557 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations

I know that I disagree with Sharon Trembley over this point, but I would be
extremely worried about an attempt to hold a CC in Las Vegas with no local
committee members at all. So far as I am aware, there is nothing to
indicate that the city is at all costumer friendly.

BTW, as a native New Yorker, I’d feel the same way about an attempt to run a
CC in New York City; it is a terribly difficult venue in which to hold a
convention unless you have 5,000+ attendees or Donald Trump’s money. I have
a feeling that Las Vegas poses similar challenges that would demand people
on the ground and familiar with the city’s culture and economy.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Scott & JoAnn Abbott” <bubblemum@comcast.net>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations

> Las Vegas….just to drool at the Liberace museum would be nice…then
there
> is the Star Trek experience and all kinds of other neat places to see and
> play.
>
> Might wind up missing the con though, having too much fun in the rest of
the
> town!
>
> JoAnn in VA

 

Group: runacc Message: 558 From: martingear Date: 4/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Upcoming CostumeCon Locations

Having been involved in several business and techie type conventions in
L-V, I’d like to make several comments.
1- The LV Convention & Business Association advertises that you can book
1 Million hotel rooms with a single telephone call.
2- Most LV hotels get the bulk of their revenue from gambling and aren’t
particularly interested in groups that don’t gamble heavily.
3- I have yet to visit a Las Vegas hotel that was non-smoking. Even if
they offer non-smoking rooms, they are usually set up so that you have
to go through the casino to get from the sleeping rooms to function
space, and the casinos are heavy smoking areas.
4- Las Vegas is one of the most heavily unionized cities that I have
ever work in, and this includes the hotels.
5- NetWorld/Interop brought 50,000 visitors into Las Vegas and had to
pay for the hotel function space that they used in addition to the
Convention Center rental.
6- Unless you have a local group in Las Vegas that wants to run a CC and
can work around or through the above, don’t even think about that city
as a location. If you want to go to Atlantic City, or Reno, or Las
Vegas go on vacation or on business when someone else is paying for it,
but don’t try to combine it with costume con.

Marty

Byron Connell wrote:

>I know that I disagree with Sharon Trembley over this point, but I would be
>extremely worried about an attempt to hold a CC in Las Vegas with no local
>committee members at all. So far as I am aware, there is nothing to
>indicate that the city is at all costumer friendly.
>
>BTW, as a native New Yorker, I’d feel the same way about an attempt to run a
>CC in New York City; it is a terribly difficult venue in which to hold a
>convention unless you have 5,000+ attendees or Donald Trump’s money. I have
>a feeling that Las Vegas poses similar challenges that would demand people
>on the ground and familiar with the city’s culture and economy.
>
>Byron
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 559 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

>I don’t have an argument with people basing designs on bogus period
>sources; the source itself is legitimately historical even if the
>garment it describes never existed. I doubt I’d ding somebody in that
>case. I’d actually probably give extra credit to somebody who
>identified that a real historical source had bogus content and entered
>something based on it as a recreation of a historical fantasy.
>
>I’m more concerned (and I know this is nitpicking) with bogus
>out-of-period sources, such as discredited pop anthropologists.

Andy,

I hate to be annoying, but there are lots of us out here who haven’t a clue
how to know if the source was a discredited pop-anthropologist! Lots of us
want to try wetting our toes in historicals, but you, quite frankly, can
scare us away!

I am a costumer who happens to want to reproduce some of the wonderful
garments I have seen pictures of. I have looked in books and pattern
sources. I have asked friends for advice. I have gotten the courage to
make said garment – which (as we all know) is much harder than I had
anticipated! I have screwed up the courage to go through rigourous
pre-judging. I have done all of this, but you say I also need to find out
if my sources were bogus!?

Fageddaboudit! I’ll go back to the F/SF. Judging criteria like those are
the big reason why I continue to do only humorous entries in historical –
but I got to be a Master that way!

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 560 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Elaine,
ANy historical costume needs more than one source to coroborate the info,
just like the weekly world news or the enquirer does.
But serouosly, your first source is the thing that inspired you to make it.
You don’t necc. need tons of info on that dress itself, but a couple of
other overviews of the time period would make your’ first source seem resonable

For example, My Baseball Player from CC-9. was inspired by the statue of
Casey at the Bat in Cooperstown. So it’s like any other art piece. (
although in this case a fictional one)

So easily whithin the same library, I found pic’s of REAL players of the time,
then I found a sporting goods catalog with fabric descriptions, and a few
samples
I also found out that the statue was WRONG about some things.
So I changed them for my costume.

So if you have a pic or a painting of something you like, it seems logical
to just study the period in general and find more than one book that seems
to tell you the same things generally, and use it as an overlaying guide to
building the costume.

> Judging criteria like those are
>the big reason why I continue to do only humorous entries in historical –
>but I got to be a Master that way!

Well, you know you’re preaching to the choir here. After the ass-munching
that I got as CC-6,
I chose never to compete the Baseball uniform, even though I actually did
all the research.
So I have my 3 Historical wins as The Motown group, ( cc4)The Hobo
Clowns,(cc10)and now the Beatniks.(cc21)
And if there’s a cool dress you want, just make it and enjoy.

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 561 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/19/2004
Subject: Historical and Historical (was Re: CC22 review

On Apr 19, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:

> I am a costumer who happens to want to reproduce some of the wonderful
> garments I have seen pictures of. I have looked in books and pattern
> sources. I have asked friends for advice. I have gotten the courage
> to
> make said garment – which (as we all know) is much harder than I had
> anticipated! I have screwed up the courage to go through rigourous
> pre-judging. I have done all of this, but you say I also need to find
> out
> if my sources were bogus!?

There is plenty of room for this in the historical interpretation
category. It is generally accepted that a historical interpretation
entry only need show that it’s based on historical sources, and all you
really need for that is a picture or two. I’ve specifically been
talking about historical recreation and that’s a whole different
animal. Part of this is informed by my observations of SCA
arts-and-sciences judging where research skills are valued a skill as
actual technique.

And in any case, I expect that you would be smart enough to steer clear
of sources like Erich von Daniken (unless, of course, that were part of
your joke).

You know, now you’ve got me thinking about next year and doing a
historical Egyptian based on old Rosicrucian sources…

😉

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 562 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/20/2004
Subject: Re: Historical and Historical

OK, Andy, that’s the best answer for Elaine-now. Now what about the answer
for Elaine-who wants to do Recreation? What about anyone who wants to try
recreation? Are you saying that everyone MUST have knowledge of bogus
sources? How are we to do that without training? And what about the vast
numbers of us who are not SCAdians?

And, while I am smart, I just may not know who Erich von Daniken is. What
may seem obvious to you is not always obvious to everyone else. My major
was nursing; not art, history, religion or fashion. I’ll just bet the same
would apply to many other costumers, as well.

I think the judges should rely, again, on the documentation presented,
instead of what they “know” about the source of the documentation. They
might want, at another time, to let the costumer know more about their
sources – which will educate them a bit for future research. I look at the
historical in general as a whole new field of education for myself, and
welcome information. However, I am not interested in taking formal studies
just to participate.

Sorry, but I have to continue to disagree with you on this one. Please do
not summarily consign everyone who is less knowlegeable than yourself to
Interp.

Elaine

>
>There is plenty of room for this in the historical interpretation
>category. It is generally accepted that a historical interpretation
>entry only need show that it’s based on historical sources, and all you
>really need for that is a picture or two. I’ve specifically been
>talking about historical recreation and that’s a whole different
>animal. Part of this is informed by my observations of SCA
>arts-and-sciences judging where research skills are valued a skill as
>actual technique.
>
>And in any case, I expect that you would be smart enough to steer clear
>of sources like Erich von Daniken (unless, of course, that were part of
>your joke).
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar � FREE!
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 563 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/20/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Ricky,

>And if there’s a cool dress you want, just make it and enjoy.

That is exactly what I do, as I’m sure you have seen. I was playing Devil’s
Advocate here. Someone has to speak up for the wannabees. I want to
encourage people to wade in and test the waters, because we need them! And
I WAS thinking about CC 6, and about Kathy & Drew’s “The Rape of the Lock,”
which was a bead-for-bead recreation of the painting – but not historically
perfect – according to the judges, who “knew.”

But I thank you for the encouragement!

Elaine

_________________________________________________________________
Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN
Premium!
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/mlb&pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 564 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Kevin and I just got back from Denver Coronation, where we hung out
with folks from The Imperial Rainbow Court of Northern Utah (Ogden) and
The Imperial Court of Iowa (Des Moines). Showed them WorldCon and CC
masquerade pictures after the ball. Those queens just went ape. None of
them had any idea anything like this happens.

Go to their coronations. These are events where folks from around the
country and particularly within the region come to congratulate the
local Empress and Emperor on their successful year raising money for
charity. Dress for the theme. Hand out fliers and award ribbons if you
have them. Think about “walking as an in-town organization” (and if you
decide to, email me and ask how protocol works). These folks live to
dress finely and look spectacular. You’ll get members, particularly
from the in-region folks.

http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/ogden.html
Ogden’s coronation is November 19, 2004. They’ve got a crap theme: “An
Evening of Diversity, Worldwide Celebration” — not much inspiration to
make something specific for it, but just about any formal or ethnic
costume would be appropriate.

http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/desmoines.html
http://www.imperialcourtofia.org/Coronation%20XI.htm
Iowa coronation is September 25, 2004, and there’s a tiny chance we
might be there. Now they’ve got a theme… “Vampires, Witches and
Warlocks: A Nocturnal Journey into Magic, Voodoo and Beyond.” The
fancier and gothier the better.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 565 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Oh, so you’re not lost on this Imperial Court thing…
This is the message I sent to our new court members in San Jose the
beginning of this reign. For more information about what Imperial
Courts do these days, check out our website at http://www.irlm.org/

Begin forwarded message:
Subject: [IRLM-R34] Court History in a nutshell 1

Chapter 1: When dirt was new, and some drag queen decided it might make
a nice facial mask

It’s not all about Mama José, but great parts might as well be. Mama
José really is a legend in her own time. If only a quarter of the
stories she tells were true, she would still be a formidable queen.
There’s plenty to back all of them up, though. Even the really crazy
ones.

Back in the 40’s and 50’s, a young gay man named José Sarria made a
name for himself hosting and doing drag at a gay bar/restaurant in San
Francisco called “The Black Cat.” The Black Cat closed when the staff
and ownership finally got tired of fighting with the state, city and
county regulators, which is what it took to keep a gay bar open at the
time. Afterwards, José still kept his hand in and stayed in contact
with the fledgling Tavern Guild, an association of SF gay bar owners
that formed in the early sixties. He also ran for County Supervisor in
1961, the first openly gay man (and definitely the first drag queen) to
run for public office anywhere.

In 1965, the Tavern Guild sponsored a drag ball where José was offered
the crown of queen of the ball. She took it, saying something to the
effect of “I’ve been a queen all of my life,” put the crown on her own
head and declared herself “Empress of San Francisco.” The Tavern Guild
turned this into an annual ball, electing and crowning a new Empress
every year.

There’s some parallel stuff going on in Portland at this time, too. In
1958, Queen Samuel of the Court of Transylvania declared herself
Monarch of Portland. Only lasted a little over a year, but in 1966 they
started electing “Rose Queens” twice a year.

Note: This was all pre-Stonewall. There was gay life before Stonewall.

San Jose comes into the picture in 1970, electing our first Empress (or
“Reina” as we referred to them back then) of Casa de San Jose, the
first “new” Imperial Court to follow San Francisco. Shortly after that,
Portland elected its first “Rose Empress” and Vancouver, BC elected the
first Empress of Canada (well, after Queen Victoria). Amongst protocol
wonks you’ll hear arguments (pretty much worn out by now) who has the
oldest court. Don’t worry too much about it. The nice thing is at
coronations where courts are presented in order of first reign
(sometimes jokingly referred to as “age before beauty”) we walk really
early.

But let’s get back to Mama José. By 1974, Empress José had declared
herself José, Empress Norton I, the Widow Norton, wife to the late
Joshua Norton, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico.

So here’s your ancient history lesson. Joshua Abraham Norton was a San
Francisco businessman who lost his fortune in a bad business deal in
the 1850s. He went a bit crazy, hid away from the world for 5 years,
and when he re-emerged proclaimed himself Norton I, Emperor of the
United States (he added “Protector of Mexico” later). Emperor Norton
was a classy nutcase, though. Breezing through San Francisco high
society, dressed to the nines in a military uniform appropriate to an
Emperor, and without a dime to his name most of the time, he was loved
by the city. He was loved to the point that many businesses accepted
his personal currency. He died in 1880, some forty years before José’s
birth.

The Sunday morning after San Francisco Coronation 1974, Mama José and a
few other drag queens got into a limo with their escorts and were
chauffeured to Woodlawn Cemetery in Colma to visit the grave of Emperor
Norton, beginning a 30 year tradition. Not to buck a trend, the
cemetery directors (including a former Mayor of SF and a California
Superior Court Judge) quietly welcomed them back after the first year,
providing coffee, danish, and a place for the visitors to assemble
before walking up the hill to the grave-site.

Keep that ever in mind.

We’re playing an old and very silly game here. We’re following the
vision of a short little hispanic drag queen with unbelievable
chutzpah, walking in the footsteps of a nearly 200 year old San
Francisco street person. Whatever you might say of either of them, both
have made their place in the world with grace and style. It’s up to us
to maintain a sense of both the ridiculous and sublime.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 566 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines
Andy,
Actually, it’s a good idea for any upcoming CC.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 567 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden

On Apr 26, 2004, at 6:52 PM, Andrew T Trembley wrote:

> http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/ogden.html
> Ogden’s coronation is November 19, 2004. They’ve got a crap theme: “An
> Evening of Diversity, Worldwide Celebration” — not much inspiration to
> make something specific for it, but just about any formal or ethnic
> costume would be appropriate.

‘k, the theme isn’t as dire as I though; it’s just schitzophrenic. I
found their flyer.

Coronations take part in “acts” and they’re doing a different theme for
each act (I assume in this order)
A Journey to Cirque du Soleil
Party Down Bourbon Street
Celebrate A Chinese New Year

Oh, and it’s at… Ta Da! the Ogden Marriot. Good chance to look over
the hotel while a function is going on. Also good chance to get the
scuttlebutt on how the hotel is to work with.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 568 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden
Forgot one for y’all

Memorial Day Weekend (assuming you’re not going to BayCon or something
else scheduled then) is Salt Lake City’s coronation.
Saturday, May 29, 2004
Hilton Salt Lake City Center
http://www.rcgse.org/calendar/2004-05-Coronation.html

Now these folks have a theme… “Namaste,” a celebration of India’s
golden age. Salt Lake Coronation is also one of those destinations that
imperials from all over the continent go to. It’s a chance to do some
nationwide marketing within an hour’s drive of home.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 569 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines

What about St. Louis?

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: “Sallie Abba” <srabba@worldnet.att.net>; “David Doering”
<dave@techvoice.com>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: [runacc] Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines

> Kevin and I just got back from Denver Coronation, where we hung out
> with folks from The Imperial Rainbow Court of Northern Utah (Ogden) and
> The Imperial Court of Iowa (Des Moines). Showed them WorldCon and CC
> masquerade pictures after the ball. Those queens just went ape. None of
> them had any idea anything like this happens.
>
> Go to their coronations. These are events where folks from around the
> country and particularly within the region come to congratulate the
> local Empress and Emperor on their successful year raising money for
> charity. Dress for the theme. Hand out fliers and award ribbons if you
> have them. Think about “walking as an in-town organization” (and if you
> decide to, email me and ask how protocol works). These folks live to
> dress finely and look spectacular. You’ll get members, particularly
> from the in-region folks.
>
> http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/ogden.html
> Ogden’s coronation is November 19, 2004. They’ve got a crap theme: “An
> Evening of Diversity, Worldwide Celebration” — not much inspiration to
> make something specific for it, but just about any formal or ethnic
> costume would be appropriate.
>
> http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/desmoines.html
> http://www.imperialcourtofia.org/Coronation%20XI.htm
> Iowa coronation is September 25, 2004, and there’s a tiny chance we
> might be there. Now they’ve got a theme… “Vampires, Witches and
> Warlocks: A Nocturnal Journey into Magic, Voodoo and Beyond.” The
> fancier and gothier the better.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
> 2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
> hand
> Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 570 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing opportunity for Ogden and Des Moines

On Apr 27, 2004, at 4:29 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> What about St. Louis?

St. Louis doesn’t have an Imperial Court. Sorry. Doesn’t mean that the
Des Moines and Ogden folks can’t put out your fliers there if they go,
though.

You can check the chapter listing
http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/index.html for what’s near, but
it looks like Des Moines, Chicago, Lexington (KY) and maybe Omaha are
the nearest courts to you. Probably a bit too much of a trek for the
return.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 571 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Cross-Marketing
Still on the theme of PR:
I’ve got the germ of an idea that I’d like to put out here and get some help
refining.
Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the same
cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones? Couldn’t
a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs

PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more extensive
interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and efforts.
Here’s some thoughts:
1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the others;
maybe bids as well.
2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”
3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
expensive.

In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using each
other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event. Obviously each
group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why not
piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider benefits.
Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 572 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Costuming GOHs
How many and which Cons have Costuming GOHs regularly?
I don’t know the whole list but think those would definitely be the ones to
focus on for PR. To me, that would be an indicator that they have an active
costuming community.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 573 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

On Apr 28, 2004, at 5:01 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
> geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the
> same
> cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones?
> Couldn’t
> a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs

Yes.

> PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more
> extensive
> interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and
> efforts.
> Here’s some thoughts:
> 1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the
> others;
> maybe bids as well.

We do color flyers. I looked into having them printed at a copy shop,
but it’s cheaper for me to buy a cheap inkjet printer, paper and ink
for 1000 flyers, run the job and throw out everything at the end and
start over. Keeping the printer for another run, of course, saves a bit
of money 😉

I used to run a pack of 200 flyers for a big con, but I’ve found most
of them go to waste (unless we pick the extras up at the end of the
con). These days I keep a stack of about 100 on hand (unless it’s a
really big costume-heavy con) and put out 20 or so at a time,
restocking if they run low.

Mail us a pack of fliers, we’ll put them out at the cons we go to.
Email me a PDF, and we’ll print and put out a few dozen. Next stops
are:
May 8: Imperial Dove Court de Fresno/Madera Coronation
May 28-31: BayCon
June 19: Silver Dollar Court of Reno Coronation
July 2-5: WesterCon
August 7: Imperial Court de San Diego Coronation
September 2-6: Noreascon4 (WorldCon)
September 18: Chicago Coronation (probably)

> 2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
> Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”

One of our fliers is “Mark your calendar for Costume-Con” with seated
committees’ and our bid’s dates. As soon as St. Louis has a published
date and venue, I’ll be updating your information on it.

> 3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
> expensive.

I’m not sure of the value of program book ads for marketing to the
general membership. They’re very valuable in terms of building
connections with other convention committees.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 574 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

On Apr 28, 2004, at 4:37 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> How many and which Cons have Costuming GOHs regularly?
> I don’t know the whole list but think those would definitely be the
> ones to
> focus on for PR. To me, that would be an indicator that they have an
> active
> costuming community.

Julie Zetterberg is Costume GOH at MarCon (Memorial Day Weekend) this
year. She’s going to be taking some of our fliers and award ribbons
with her.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 575 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

On Apr 28, 2004, at 5:01 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using
> each
> other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event.
> Obviously each
> group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why
> not
> piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider
> benefits.

So here’s a starting point:
We’ve got a calendar on the RunaCC yahoogroup.
Log your events into the calendar with a subject format like
“CC26? at BayCon”
and the start-date of the event
Include in the notes what activities are planned for the event.
Set a reminder for 14 days in advance. That will give people time to
mail out fliers to you.

At least we know then who will be where and when


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 576 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing
Think of applying some of the cross-marketing schemes to some of the big
sewing and Fiber Arta magazines, too–if several CC’s could get a display
ad together, it might cost everybody a lot less.

We really need to keep pushing CC to markets outside of fandom–think
design schools, sewing magazines, bead groups, art-to-wear folks, etc. I
wouldn’t go nuts pushing the con to schools and clubs outside the
aforementioned 500-mile radius of a given con, but I would try to hit as
many nationally circulated magazines as possible that appeal to creative
type people–Threads, Belle Armoire, etc. (Is Theater Crafts still around?
I haven’t had a subscription for years.)

The con needs to grow, and we need “new blood” from whereever we can get it.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 577 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

That one we knew. What other cons (in any state) regularly have Costuming
GOHs? Our regional, Archon, has for several years now. What others?

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> Julie Zetterberg is Costume GOH at MarCon (Memorial Day Weekend) this
> year. She’s going to be taking some of our fliers and award ribbons
> with her.

 

Group: runacc Message: 578 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

Inserted comments below.

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> We do color flyers. I looked into having them printed at a copy shop,
> but it’s cheaper for me to buy a cheap inkjet printer, paper and ink
> for 1000 flyers, run the job and throw out everything at the end and
> start over. Keeping the printer for another run, of course, saves a bit
> of money 😉
> I used to run a pack of 200 flyers for a big con, but I’ve found most
> of them go to waste (unless we pick the extras up at the end of the
> con). These days I keep a stack of about 100 on hand (unless it’s a
> really big costume-heavy con) and put out 20 or so at a time,
> restocking if they run low.

Yes, we’ve noted that color is cheaper to do at home, as well. And we’ve
also observed that re-stocking flyers is much cheaper.

> Mail us a pack of fliers, we’ll put them out at the cons we go to.
> Email me a PDF, and we’ll print and put out a few dozen.

Both ideas could work but which might be better? I see this as a
co-dependency thing – “You take mine, I’ll take yours” – so nobody loses and
you don’t have to worry about whether your flyers got there or ended up in
the trash because someone reliable is handling them for you.
FYI: PDF creation is not accessible to the average Joe. Would other formats
work for you? I’d be willing to accept Word docs and .rtfs (which
conicidentally is what I’d be able to send).

> One of our fliers is “Mark your calendar for Costume-Con” with seated
> committees’ and our bid’s dates. As soon as St. Louis has a published
> date and venue, I’ll be updating your information on it.

Yeah, that’s kind of the idea. We have info & links about past and future
CCs on CC25’s website. My thoughts on this would be to ‘share the wealth’.
if someone’s interested but can’t make a particular location, they’ll have
an easy list of upcoming sites. It will also reinforce that CC is a
traveling con and they’ll have future opportunities to attend if the
immediate ones aren’t in their area.

> I’m not sure of the value of program book ads for marketing to the
> general membership. They’re very valuable in terms of building
> connections with other convention committees.

So a collective ad would still build good will with the con committees and
yet cover more areas with less cost per con. We’ll still be supporting the
cons and get more PR coverage.

Anybody else?

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 579 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

On Apr 28, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> FYI: PDF creation is not accessible to the average Joe. Would other
> formats
> work for you? I’d be willing to accept Word docs and .rtfs (which
> conicidentally is what I’d be able to send).

Depends on what software and system you’re using. There is almost
always some way in which PDF creation is available to the average joe.

I do have full Adobe Acrobat, and use it to create PDFs, but I know not
everybody can afford it. Educational Discount (and indulgent management
at work) is nice.

If you’re on a Mac using OS X, you can create a PDF from any program;
it’s a standard printing feature of the system.

Some packages like Corel Draw and just about anything from Adobe offer
a “save as PDF” option.

There is also free PDF software available for windows:
http://www.primopdf.com/

The reason I ask for PDF is because then I don’t have to worry about
fonts and layout. PDF displays and prints consistently everywhere.
Can’t say that about MS Office doctypes, whether you’re talking .doc,
.xls or .rtf


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 580 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Arisia and Lunacon do, but it varies from year to year, depending on who’s
on the committee and pushing for it.

Ditto Balticon.

I was Fan GOH of WesterCon in 1989 based mainly on my costuming. Does that
mean they should count? (Andy probably has a better grasp of how
costumer-friendly the con is now.)

–Karen

At 06:07 PM 4/28/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>That one we knew. What other cons (in any state) regularly have Costuming
>GOHs? Our regional, Archon, has for several years now. What others?
>
>Nora
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> > Julie Zetterberg is Costume GOH at MarCon (Memorial Day Weekend) this
> > year. She’s going to be taking some of our fliers and award ribbons
> > with her.
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 581 From: martingear Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

><snip>
>
>FYI: PDF creation is not accessible to the average Joe. Would other formats
>work for you? I’d be willing to accept Word docs and .rtfs (which
>conicidentally is what I’d be able to send).
>
>

If Adobe is too rich for your blood, and it is for mine, I can recommend
the following program:

PDF Creation, Tools and 100+ Templates for Office
One step creation & emailing of PDF files and yes you get pw protection,
hyperlinks, TOC, encryption and much more.
WOW special – Reg $39.95 – Just $19.95

http://www.templatezone.com/pdf-writer/officeready-pdf.asp?CID=153

It’s an add-on to Word & Excel and so far it has worked seamlessly for me. WordPerfect comes with a built-in “Save to PDF” and the above program seems to work equally well from Word. As usual, YMMV. I don’t have any business relationship with the company, but I’m always happy to recommend cheap software that does what it is supposed to do.

Marty

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 582 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

On Apr 28, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I was Fan GOH of WesterCon in 1989 based mainly on my costuming. Does
> that
> mean they should count? (Andy probably has a better grasp of how
> costumer-friendly the con is now.)

WesterCon, like WorldCon, depends entirely upon the committee putting
it on. There is the strong traditional support for Masquerade, but some
years that might be it. This year the head of programming just happens
to be the president of SWCG and the FanGOH is John Hertz, so it’s going
to be a very costume-friendly con.

As for the Fan GOH question… regardless of the membership, any
convention that picks costumers as FanGOHs regularly is worth
cultivating a relationship with.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 583 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

Sounds like an idea! It might work best in terms of program book ads, which
can be too costly for an individual concom.

Flyers get cluttered up on freebee tables or racks; a flyer advertising
several CCs would need a VERY prominent headline to grab fannish attention
in the chaos of competing flyers (but that’s not impossible to devise).

Certainly, it would be good to bring/send to a con flyers for seated (and
therefore noncompetitive) CCs. I distributed CC 22 con and CC 26 bid flyers
at Arisia and Lunacon this year. If possible, have the flyers available at
masquerade registration and in the masquerade green room.

Now, what further steps can we take to attract costumers from venues other
than SF cons?

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 8:01 AM
Subject: [runacc] Cross-Marketing

> Still on the theme of PR:
> I’ve got the germ of an idea that I’d like to put out here and get some
help
> refining.
> Since all CCs are aiming at the same general market, no matter what the
> geographic area, shouldn’t we at least have all of our flyers at the same
> cons? Particularly the hot-bed, costuming friendly/intensive ones?
Couldn’t
> a shared mass-marketing scheme be devised to promote all CCs
>
> PR can be expensive. By sharing PR efforts we can generate more extensive
> interest while reducing overall costs by pooling our resources and
efforts.
> Here’s some thoughts:
> 1. If one CC is sending flyers to a Con, include flyers from all the
others;
> maybe bids as well.
> 2. Collective flyers for smaller cons? Something like “Interested in
> Costuming? Upcoming CCs are…”
> 3. Collective ads; similar content to #2 above. Program ads can be
> expensive.
>
> In other words, instead of marketing as individual cons, start using each
> other’s sources and promote Costume-Con as a recurring event. Obviously
each
> group would devote more of their resources to their own effort but why not
> piggyback? Share the work and the cost, and possibly produce wider
benefits.
> Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 584 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Inclusion of a costume GoH seems to has been a growing phenomenon in recent
years — a good thing! Arisia and Lunacon have added one recently; I do not
know about other East Coast cons right now. This could reflect the presence
in their areas of active ICG chapters interested in competition costuming.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:37 AM
Subject: [runacc] Costuming GOHs

> How many and which Cons have Costuming GOHs regularly?
> I don’t know the whole list but think those would definitely be the ones
to
> focus on for PR. To me, that would be an indicator that they have an
active
> costuming community.
>
> Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 585 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Very good point.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Costuming GOHs

> As for the Fan GOH question… regardless of the membership, any
> convention that picks costumers as FanGOHs regularly is worth
> cultivating a relationship with.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen

 

Group: runacc Message: 586 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

At 09:43 PM 4/28/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Arisia and Lunacon have added one recently; I do not
>know about other East Coast cons right now.

Balticon had Carol Salemi as Costume GOH in 2002, but there has been no
follow-up since.

Ricky sez you typically have to have a costumer-friendly con chair to get a
Costumer GOH to happen.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 587 From: martingear Date: 4/28/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

I have very deliberately NOT pushed for Balticon to have a “Costumer
GoH”. Andrew Bergestrom (the con-chair that we fired) was the one who
decided to have a CGoH, and while the con was very happy to have Carol,
there was a good deal of unhappy talk afterward about were we trying to
turn Balticon into Costumecon. Given that I have been able to convince
Balticon to spend much more money on tech for the masquerade then it
really deserves (given the number of entries lately), as well as having
a costume programming track, providing a large function room (free) for
a Costumers’ party, and permitting a costumers’ guild fund raising
auction, I think that Balticon is sufficiently “Costumer Friendly” that
I don’t need to irritate anyone in the club by pushing for a CGoH. If a
future con chair decides to do it again, I won’t vote against it, but
neither will I propose it, and no, I’m not going to run another Balticon.

Marty

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>At 09:43 PM 4/28/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>Arisia and Lunacon have added one recently; I do not
>>know about other East Coast cons right now.
>>
>>
>
>Balticon had Carol Salemi as Costume GOH in 2002, but there has been no
>follow-up since.
>
>Ricky sez you typically have to have a costumer-friendly con chair to get a
>Costumer GOH to happen.
>
>–Karen
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 588 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

Byron Connell wrote:

> Now, what further steps can we take to attract costumers from venues other
> than SF cons?

Well, first we need to identify those other venues.

My take on this is…

Imperial Courts (well, it’s what I’m stuck with this year, but it’s also
something I participate in anyway).

Local SCA chapters

Ethnic heritage societies

College art and drama programs

Local conventions (of all sorts)

I’ve imported my marketing database into the databases section of the
RunaCC yahoogroup so you can look it over. Right now it’s only about 2
dozen entries, and I haven’t started making heavy use of it, but it’s
something.

Feel free to enter your own marketing targets.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 589 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs
Wow Marty, thats interesting.
Was it general fandom who made the costume-con statements?
or was it con-com types?
was there a perception that anything Andy Bergstrom wanted must be tainted?

The “turn Balticon into Costume -Con” quote seems so illogical.
Imagine what they’d think if it was still drawing 50-60 entries like in the
old days.

I’m in no way questioning your message of what’s going on there, just, as
an outsider, I always viewed Balticon as the warmest fuzzyest place for
costumers anywhere.
Perhaps thats more because of you and Bobbi than the con-coms themselves?

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 590 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

martingear wrote:

> I have very deliberately NOT pushed for Balticon to have a “Costumer
> GoH”. Andrew Bergestrom (the con-chair that we fired) was the one who
> decided to have a CGoH, and while the con was very happy to have Carol,
> there was a good deal of unhappy talk afterward about were we trying to
> turn Balticon into Costumecon.

I’m assuming that the Balticon in question ran sometime near when CC ran
in the area.

I’ve got to wonder, though, what drugs people were taking when they
concluded that adding a Costume GoH was an attempt to turn Balticon into
Costume-Con. It’s not like having a Costume GoH takes anything away
(besides a bit of budget, which had to have been there in the first
place) from the convention being a general con.

It’s a perception thing. There will always be “trufen” who believe that
their fandom is the only fandom, and anything different is a dangerous
distraction (the worst examples seem to be found in fanzine fandom).
There will always be people who assume that folks involved in fannish
niches (gaming, art, costuming) aren’t interested in anything else.

The former can go to hell. The latter… I can forgive. A costumer out
of costume doesn’t look any different than any other fan, much like a
gamer away from the gaming table does. Considering how often my friends
don’t recognize me in costume, I can understand when folks who don’t
know me don’t realize when I’m doing a more general panel that they’ve
seen me on stage.

So where does this leave the question of Costume GoH’s?

I guess I like the idea of Costume GoH’s. I’d rather, though, see more
conventions considering costumers for Fan GoH candidates. Costume GoH’s
reinforce the idea that we’re something different from other fans (and
since for most of us this isn’t a profession, that isn’t true; even for
the professionals it often isn’t). Costumers as Fan GoH’s reinforce that
we’re part of the happy fannish family. It may mean less chances for
costumers to travel and enjoy a con on a committee’s nickel, but I think
it would help show that costume fandom is in the heart of general fandom.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 591 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Andrew Trembley wrote:

> I guess I like the idea of Costume GoH’s. I’d rather, though, see more
> conventions considering costumers for Fan GoH candidates. Costume GoH’s
> reinforce the idea that we’re something different from other fans (and
> since for most of us this isn’t a profession, that isn’t true; even for
> the professionals it often isn’t). Costumers as Fan GoH’s reinforce that
> we’re part of the happy fannish family. It may mean less chances for
> costumers to travel and enjoy a con on a committee’s nickel, but I think
> it would help show that costume fandom is in the heart of general fandom.
>
> andy

Hear, Hear!!!

I think that you’re right – the perception is frequently that costumers
aren’t “real” fen, because they devote their free time to something
other than reading. Sadly, the same perception at Balticon has occurred
for other niches as well (not just costume).

While it isn’t (and never will be) as bad as Boskone for the
not-readers, there have been times in the fairly recent past where
members of the Balticon concom have been less than friendly towards the
“other” fen, and the con has suffered a reduction in attendance as a
result. Many of the people who took their toys and went elsewhere are
showing up now at the Anime cons.

There are other factors as well. The con used to be Easter Weekend, and
now occurs on Memorial Day weekend. Sadly, that puts it in direct
competition with about a half a dozen other major events (including
MediaWest), which draw long-time masquerade participants away from the area.

Add to that the number of local costumers who have burned out, are
dealing with health/financial issues, or who just don’t get to cons
anymore, and you have a substantially smaller field of entries in the
masquerade.

I don’t think that this is Costume-Con’s fault, but I can understand the
perception problem.

And I’m one of the ones to blame for not competing. I really *hate* the
Omni (or whatever it goes by these days), and commuting does not go with
costuming for competition. Now that we have a van, things might be a
little different, but with a new baby, it will likely still be some time
before I get up on stage with a presentation again.

I heard a hot rumor (unsubstantiated) that the Hunt Valley will be
taking Balticon back in the near future. If that’s the case, we may
start attending on a regular basis again.

YMMV!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 592 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

In a message dated 4/28/2004 8:43:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> Inclusion of a costume GoH seems to has been a growing phenomenon in recent
> years — a good thing!

I just remembered that you were the Costuming GoH at Archon some years ago,
Byron. I was happy to see you there, but then again, I’m happy to bump into you
at any con!

I think that the reason that more cons are having a C GoH is because they
realize that the masquerade IS a major drawing event on Saturday night. At least
the smart conventions. At WindyCon in Chicago, getting them to treat the
masquerade more than just an after thought has been a struggle for ten years. They
seem to think that their long and windy art auction, which doesn’t sell as
much art as it should because its long and windy, is much more important.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 593 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

In a message dated 4/28/2004 9:03:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> Ricky sez you typically have to have a costumer-friendly con chair to get a
>
> Costumer GOH to happen.

Hmmm. That would explain the troubles at WindyCon.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 594 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Andrew Trembley wrote:

><snip>
>
> I’m assuming that the Balticon in question ran sometime near when CC
> ran in the area.

Actually, no. Because Balticon is Costumer Friendly, and has supported
the three CC’s that we have held in the area, we have been careful not
to step on their weekend.

See my answer to Ricky.

><snip>
>
>I guess I like the idea of Costume GoH’s. I’d rather, though, see more
>conventions considering costumers for Fan GoH candidates. Costume GoH’s
>reinforce the idea that we’re something different from other fans (and
>since for most of us this isn’t a profession, that isn’t true; even for
>the professionals it often isn’t). Costumers as Fan GoH’s reinforce that
>we’re part of the happy fannish family. It may mean less chances for
>costumers to travel and enjoy a con on a committee’s nickel, but I think
>it would help show that costume fandom is in the heart of general fandom.
>
>andy
>

I am in total agreement with you here. I’ve been Fan (or Fang) GoH at
three large regional conventions and while I’m sure that the reason had
something to do with my costuming, I hope that wasn’t the only reason.

Marty

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 595 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Betsy Delaney wrote:

><snip>
>There are other factors as well. The con used to be Easter Weekend, and
>now occurs on Memorial Day weekend. Sadly, that puts it in direct
>competition with about a half a dozen other major events (including
>MediaWest), which draw long-time masquerade participants away from the area.
>

The reason that Balticon changed weekends is that attendance had been
dropping steadily and people kept telling us that it was because Easter
or Passover was a family time, and if we’d change the weekend they would
come. We did and they didn’t.

><snip>
>And I’m one of the ones to blame for not competing. I really *hate* the
>Omni (or whatever it goes by these days), and commuting does not go with
>costuming for competition. Now that we have a van, things might be a
>little different, but with a new baby, it will likely still be some time
>before I get up on stage with a presentation again.
>

Excuses, excuses, excuses .

>I heard a hot rumor (unsubstantiated) that the Hunt Valley will be
>taking Balticon back in the near future. If that’s the case, we may
>start attending on a regular basis again.
>

Betsy, you can always ask a member of the Board of Directors. It is not
unsubstantiated, the contract has been signed, and it will happen two
years from now (2006). The reason that we haven’t gone back to Hunt
Valley sooner is that the convention was being blackballed by a
saleswoman at Hunt Valley who got caught, by us, trying to stick the
convention with $10,000 worth of false charges. She lost a promotion
for getting caught (not for the padded bill) and kept us out of Hunt
Valley until she finally moved out of the area.

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 596 From: martingear Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

Ricky –
It was a couple of the older con com members, and I think that in part
their concern was financial/ “GoH creep” rather than being
“anti-costumer.” The fear was that if we had a Costumer GoH as a
standard thing then pretty soon there would be demands for a Gaming GoH,
a Media GoH, Anime GoH etc. each year and Balticon can’t afford that.
Balticon has to support BSFS (pay for a building etc.) and vice versa,
and both are run by pretty much the same committee. We do our best to
make compromises so that we can all work comfortably with each other.
I’m sure that part of the problem was Andrew and his attempt to
run/micromanage every aspect of the con. The con chair has the ability
to choose 1 special guest in addition to choosing the Writer GoH and the
Art GoH (the filk Czar chooses the Filking GoH). This is not to say
that there won’t be a Costuming GoH at some time in the future, just
that it probably won’t be an every year thing.

Marty

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>Wow Marty, thats interesting.
>Was it general fandom who made the costume-con statements?
>or was it con-com types?
>was there a perception that anything Andy Bergstrom wanted must be tainted?
>
>The “turn Balticon into Costume -Con” quote seems so illogical.
>Imagine what they’d think if it was still drawing 50-60 entries like in the
>old days.
>
>I’m in no way questioning your message of what’s going on there, just, as
>an outsider, I always viewed Balticon as the warmest fuzzyest place for
>costumers anywhere.
>Perhaps thats more because of you and Bobbi than the con-coms themselves?
>
>Ricky
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 597 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

There is a directory of all 245 public and private colleges and universities
in New York State on the New York State Education Department’s Web site, at
www.highered.nysed.gov/ocue/. It is downloadable as either an HTML or a
Word file, as well as printable as a PDF document.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Cross-Marketing
>
> College art and drama programs

>
> andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 598 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Cross-Marketing

On Apr 29, 2004, at 4:56 PM, Byron Connell wrote:

> There is a directory of all 245 public and private colleges and
> universities
> in New York State on the New York State Education Department’s Web
> site, at
> www.highered.nysed.gov/ocue/. It is downloadable as either an HTML or
> a
> Word file, as well as printable as a PDF document.

A good start. I’ve actually been combing local university and college
websites to get contact info specifically for the theater and art &
design departments. From an inside perspective, I can tell you that
results are much more forthcoming if you can actually contact the
person responsible for correspondence in the department rather than
chancing that a general inquiry gets properly routed.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 599 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

I hate to keep hammering this in, but you ain’t been to Archon yet….

Bruce

>
> I’m in no way questioning your message of what’s going on there, just, as
> an outsider, I always viewed Balticon as the warmest fuzzyest place for
> costumers anywhere.
> Perhaps thats more because of you and Bobbi than the con-coms themselves?
>
> Ricky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 600 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2004
Subject: Re: Costuming GOHs

I think that Andy’s probably right about the whole FGOH vx. CGOH thing. So
the question becomes, outside of having a friendly commmittee, how do we
get more cons to recognize the value of a costuming guest?

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “martingear” <MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Costuming GOHs

> Ricky –
> It was a couple of the older con com members, and I think that in part
> their concern was financial/ “GoH creep” rather than being
> “anti-costumer.” The fear was that if we had a Costumer GoH as a
> standard thing then pretty soon there would be demands for a Gaming GoH,
> a Media GoH, Anime GoH etc. each year and Balticon can’t afford that.
> Balticon has to support BSFS (pay for a building etc.) and vice versa,
> and both are run by pretty much the same committee. We do our best to
> make compromises so that we can all work comfortably with each other.
> I’m sure that part of the problem was Andrew and his attempt to
> run/micromanage every aspect of the con. The con chair has the ability
> to choose 1 special guest in addition to choosing the Writer GoH and the
> Art GoH (the filk Czar chooses the Filking GoH). This is not to say
> that there won’t be a Costuming GoH at some time in the future, just
> that it probably won’t be an every year thing.
>
> Marty
>
> Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> >Wow Marty, thats interesting.
> >Was it general fandom who made the costume-con statements?
> >or was it con-com types?
> >was there a perception that anything Andy Bergstrom wanted must be
tainted?
> >
> >The “turn Balticon into Costume -Con” quote seems so illogical.
> >Imagine what they’d think if it was still drawing 50-60 entries like in
the
> >old days.
> >
> >I’m in no way questioning your message of what’s going on there, just, as
> >an outsider, I always viewed Balticon as the warmest fuzzyest place for
> >costumers anywhere.
> >Perhaps thats more because of you and Bobbi than the con-coms themselves?
> >
> >Ricky
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 11 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 11 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 501 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/21/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 502 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/22/2004
Subject: CC22 ads
Group: runacc Message: 503 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/23/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 504 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/25/2004
Subject: Changes to the Costume-Con ConStitution
Group: runacc Message: 505 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Group: runacc Message: 506 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Group: runacc Message: 507 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Group: runacc Message: 508 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Group: runacc Message: 509 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Group: runacc Message: 510 From: betsy Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Offline
Group: runacc Message: 511 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/9/2004
Subject: CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 512 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Changing the deadline for bidding for all future bids…
Group: runacc Message: 513 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Participants and awards (incomplete) for CC22
Group: runacc Message: 514 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Bruce’s comments on Ricky’s review
Group: runacc Message: 515 From: Karen Heim Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Re: Participants and awards (incomplete) for CC22
Group: runacc Message: 516 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Re: CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 517 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/11/2004
Subject: Re: CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 518 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/12/2004
Subject: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 519 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 520 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 521 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 522 From: martingear Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 523 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 524 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 525 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 526 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 527 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 528 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 529 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 530 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 531 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 532 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 533 From: martingear Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 534 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review
Group: runacc Message: 535 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 536 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 537 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 538 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 539 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Hotel Contracts
Group: runacc Message: 540 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review
Group: runacc Message: 541 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts
Group: runacc Message: 542 From: David Doering Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts
Group: runacc Message: 543 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/16/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Group: runacc Message: 544 From: martingear Date: 4/16/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts
Group: runacc Message: 545 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 546 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 547 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 548 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 549 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Group: runacc Message: 550 From: martingear Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 501 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/21/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

Thank you, Eileen. To quote Rhett Butler, “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a
damn!”

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [runacc] RE: CC20

> Byron,
>
> I can understand your frustration, because like you, the ICG to me is a
> group of people I know. However to anyone who has never traveled to
outside
> cons, the ICG is a faceless organization.
>
> Many Calgary members also were very bitter against the faceless ICG after
> CC19. Calgary was encouraged by a certain large west coast chapter to bid
> for a CC, and then due to events in the intervening years, the members of
> that chapter stayed away en masse. Despite the fact that many east coast
> members came to CC19, many locals who worked on the con felt let down by
> “the ICG”. (Ironically, the members who did not work on the con are more
> friendly to the ICG because of meeting the people who came.) A year after
> CC19, a vote held by our chapter on following the ACG out of the ICG was a
> tie.
>
> I think in Australia the problem was even more intense. They had worked
for
> several years to throw a party, and the number of North Americans who came
> could be counted without taking off your shoes.
>
> By the way, I did not know that CC23 never received the site selection
fees.
> I deducted the voting fee when I sent in my membership and was never told
> otherwise.
>
> I will be out of town for the next five days, so if anyone replies to
this,
> I am not ignoring you.
>
> Eileen
>
> —–Original Message—–
>
> Why did CC 20 lead to animosity against the ICG? The ICG had nothing to
do
> with the con, except that, as ICG President, I heavily promoted CC 20 here
> in North America. I feel like I was bitten on the hand that I was using
to
> feed the con!
>
> Resentfully,
>
> Byron>

 

Group: runacc Message: 502 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/22/2004
Subject: CC22 ads
Sorry to do this to you, guys, but I don’t have everyone’s individual
address.

This is the last call for ads for the CC22 Program Book. If you are
interested in taking an ad, please contact me for rates, and send ad copy to
brownatl@earthlink.net by Wednesday. We start printing this weekend, and
although we will make every effort to include your ad, there has to be a
cutoff date. Wednesday, March 24 is it.

Thank you for your time,

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
Check out MSN PC Safety & Security to help ensure your PC is protected and
safe. http://specials.msn.com/msn/security.asp

 

Group: runacc Message: 503 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/23/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

At 11:25 PM 3/17/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>Other than the bitterness against the ICG that was fostered in Australia,
>why do you consider CC20 to have been a failure?
>
>Eileen Capes

(1) CC20 committee utterly ignored their obligation to send required
materials (one copy of all publications) to me per the CC ConStitution.
[They did pay their $1 licensing fee.]

(2) Committee utterly failed to communicate with me when I emailed them
(specifically Chris Ballis) with questions regarding the con.

(3) Committee significantly changed venue without bothering to tell me
(also see (2), above).

(4) Committee utterly botched the site selection process.

(6) The convention, for whatever reason, was very poorly attended, and the
“Big Three” events had very poor low participation, or were eliminated
entirely (Fashion Show). As CC’s “mom,” having a 20th anniversary
convention with one of the lowest attendances in CC history is just plain SAD.

Having said that, I just saw CC20’s F&S/F competition last night for the
first time (thanks to Carl Mami), and while it was extremely small, the
costumes and presentations were all of very high quality.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 504 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/25/2004
Subject: Changes to the Costume-Con ConStitution
Hi, folks!

In response to recent conversations concerning what Costume-Con is and
isn’t, the Service Mark Holders have provided a clarification to the
required events. This change is in effect for all bids after CC25, since
their bid was accepted prior to the clarification.

If you have any questions about the language of the change, please
contact Karen Dick.

Text follows. For the entire document, visit:

http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/ccconstitution.shtml

Thanks!

Betsy Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist

-snip-

1.4 Conference Activities

As tradition has established, each Costume-Con conference must have the
following program items: (a) staged costume events, including Science
Fiction/Fantasy themed competition, Historical themed competition, and
Future Fashion themed fashion show (based on a pre-conference future
fashion design competition); (b) at least ten (10)
instructional/educational presentations of some sort (which can take the
form of lectures, panel discussions, seminars, hands-on workshops,
etc.); (c) Site Selection voting for a future Costume-Con conference
(see Article 2); and (d) at least two hours and a meeting area provided
for the Annual Meeting of the International Costumers’ Guild (as
dictated by their By-laws).

Traditionally, conference activities have also included: (a) a Social
(party) on the first night of the conference; (b) costume exhibit, and
(c) a dealer/merchant area. Other events and competitions have been
added now and then at the committee’s discretion. Some of these
activities are: The Single Pattern Contest, $1.98 Contest, Iron Costumer
competition, and Doll Contest.

The Service Mark Holders reserve the right to reject any bid that does
not, in their opinion, uphold the competitive staged events and overall
high standards set by the long history of the conference. [Amended
Thursday, March 25, 2004.]


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 505 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
Hi, folks!

For those of us who will be at CC22, we seem to have come to a consensus
that we should meet for dinner on Friday. I’ll probably be running to
Burger King for Erin, so I’m game to find a good place to hang out and
chat. If people really want a sit-down dinner before the party, we might
be able to find someplace reasonable outside the hotel, once we get there.

I don’t know how late the dealer room is open, but it seems to me that
6ish is a good time to meet and still have some time to get dressed for
the party. Or should we try for 5 – 5:30?

I’m not doing a lot of costuming this year (for some obvious and some
not so obvious reasons), so I’m going to go about the party prep fairly
casually.

I’m on the road (with the computer!) starting Wednesday morning,
stopping at Greensboro that night. If there’s a reason to reach me (and
who knows – there might be…) feel free to call my cell phone at
301.922.1865. I’m not allergic to having it on and accepting calls on it.

Note that I’m not presently planning to bring the archive stuff I
brought with me last time. I’m working on the CC10 photos, and I’ll have
the site available (I hope) for casual tours.

I am hoping to run another raffle, to replace some more of the funds
I’ve spent out of pocket for photos and videos, too.

See folks there!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 506 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

If we’re going to a restaurant, we’d prefer something reasonable to cheap
price-wise.
And are we sure a discussion can be had in a restaurant setting? Always
seems a littl difficult to me.
What happened to the idea about Thursday night at the consuite?

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <costume-con@costume-con.org>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: [runacc] Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

> Hi, folks!
>
> For those of us who will be at CC22, we seem to have come to a consensus
> that we should meet for dinner on Friday. I’ll probably be running to
> Burger King for Erin, so I’m game to find a good place to hang out and
> chat. If people really want a sit-down dinner before the party, we might
> be able to find someplace reasonable outside the hotel, once we get there.
>
> I don’t know how late the dealer room is open, but it seems to me that
> 6ish is a good time to meet and still have some time to get dressed for
> the party. Or should we try for 5 – 5:30?
>
> I’m not doing a lot of costuming this year (for some obvious and some
> not so obvious reasons), so I’m going to go about the party prep fairly
> casually.
>
> I’m on the road (with the computer!) starting Wednesday morning,
> stopping at Greensboro that night. If there’s a reason to reach me (and
> who knows – there might be…) feel free to call my cell phone at
> 301.922.1865. I’m not allergic to having it on and accepting calls on it.
>
> Note that I’m not presently planning to bring the archive stuff I
> brought with me last time. I’m working on the CC10 photos, and I’ll have
> the site available (I hope) for casual tours.
>
> I am hoping to run another raffle, to replace some more of the funds
> I’ve spent out of pocket for photos and videos, too.
>
> See folks there!
>
> Betsy
> —
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Costume-Con Archivist
> Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 507 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

5:30 – 6-ish sounds good to me.

Elaine

>
>For those of us who will be at CC22, we seem to have come to a consensus
>that we should meet for dinner on Friday. I’ll probably be running to
>Burger King for Erin, so I’m game to find a good place to hang out and
>chat. If people really want a sit-down dinner before the party, we might
>be able to find someplace reasonable outside the hotel, once we get there.
>
>I don’t know how late the dealer room is open, but it seems to me that
>6ish is a good time to meet and still have some time to get dressed for
>the party. Or should we try for 5 – 5:30?

_________________________________________________________________
Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar � FREE!
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 508 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

I don’t see why we can’t get together then, too, but I suspect there are
some people who would like to participate who won’t be in until Friday.
I know Marty and Bobby aren’t coming in until then.

I also know Karen and Ricky are tied up with the dealer table, and I’m
hoping they can be there too.

And I’m right there with you on the Cheap plan. I just got a $980
estimate to fix the cosmetic stuff we need to on our current house, and
we are about to spend a metric ton of money on a new house (and we still
don’t know where, yet), so any money I can save on this trip will be a
good thing down the road.

See you folks Thursday!

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> If we’re going to a restaurant, we’d prefer something reasonable to cheap
> price-wise.
> And are we sure a discussion can be had in a restaurant setting? Always
> seems a littl difficult to me.
> What happened to the idea about Thursday night at the consuite?
>
> Nora
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Betsy Delaney” <costume-con@costume-con.org>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:23 PM
> Subject: [runacc] Reminder – Dinner on Friday?
>
>
>
>>Hi, folks!
>>
>>For those of us who will be at CC22, we seem to have come to a consensus
>>that we should meet for dinner on Friday. I’ll probably be running to
>>Burger King for Erin, so I’m game to find a good place to hang out and
>>chat. If people really want a sit-down dinner before the party, we might
>>be able to find someplace reasonable outside the hotel, once we get there.
>>
>>I don’t know how late the dealer room is open, but it seems to me that
>>6ish is a good time to meet and still have some time to get dressed for
>>the party. Or should we try for 5 – 5:30?
>>
>>I’m not doing a lot of costuming this year (for some obvious and some
>>not so obvious reasons), so I’m going to go about the party prep fairly
>>casually.
>>
>>I’m on the road (with the computer!) starting Wednesday morning,
>>stopping at Greensboro that night. If there’s a reason to reach me (and
>>who knows – there might be…) feel free to call my cell phone at
>>301.922.1865. I’m not allergic to having it on and accepting calls on it.
>>
>>Note that I’m not presently planning to bring the archive stuff I
>>brought with me last time. I’m working on the CC10 photos, and I’ll have
>>the site available (I hope) for casual tours.
>>
>>I am hoping to run another raffle, to replace some more of the funds
>>I’ve spent out of pocket for photos and videos, too.
>>
>>See folks there!
>>
>>Betsy
>>–
>>–
>>Betsy R. Delaney
>>Costume-Con Archivist
>>Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 509 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Re: Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

Betsy —

Dinner on Friday sounds OK to me. An Indian place would be nice, if there’s
someplace reasonably near. (We’ll have a car, too.)

I owe you a write-up on the Green Room for the CC runners’ guide. It’s
almost done. However, if I can’t get it off tomorrow (unlikely), I’ll get
it to you shortly (I hope) after the con.

See you at CC

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <costume-con@costume-con.org>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:23 AM
Subject: [runacc] Reminder – Dinner on Friday?

> Hi, folks!
>
> For those of us who will be at CC22, we seem to have come to a consensus
> that we should meet for dinner on Friday. I’ll probably be running to
> Burger King for Erin, so I’m game to find a good place to hang out and
> chat. If people really want a sit-down dinner before the party, we might
> be able to find someplace reasonable outside the hotel, once we get there.
>
> I don’t know how late the dealer room is open, but it seems to me that
> 6ish is a good time to meet and still have some time to get dressed for
> the party. Or should we try for 5 – 5:30?
>
> I’m not doing a lot of costuming this year (for some obvious and some
> not so obvious reasons), so I’m going to go about the party prep fairly
> casually.
>
> I’m on the road (with the computer!) starting Wednesday morning,
> stopping at Greensboro that night. If there’s a reason to reach me (and
> who knows – there might be…) feel free to call my cell phone at
> 301.922.1865. I’m not allergic to having it on and accepting calls on it.
>
> Note that I’m not presently planning to bring the archive stuff I
> brought with me last time. I’m working on the CC10 photos, and I’ll have
> the site available (I hope) for casual tours.
>
> I am hoping to run another raffle, to replace some more of the funds
> I’ve spent out of pocket for photos and videos, too.
>
> See folks there!
>
> Betsy
> —
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Costume-Con Archivist
> Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 510 From: betsy Date: 3/30/2004
Subject: Offline
Hi, folks!

I won’t have time to check my email tomorrow before getting in the car and
going. If people want/need to get ahold of me, try my cell at 301.922.1865.

Note to the Run A CC folks: I’ve goofed. I really want to go on the puppet
museum tour, and I don’t think I’ll be able to go until Friday. If that’s the
case, I’m not sure when I’ll be back at the hotel for dinner before the party.

OOPS!

I’m going to try Really Hard to get down there in time for the Thursday tour,
but I’m not holding my breath.

If all else fails, we can try and catch each other during the weekend.

Sigh.

See you Real Soon Now!

Betsy
Your Site Selection Commissioner

(ps: Traveling with one small child was interesting. Two? I’ve got chills…)

Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large
WebInvent.com, Inc.

************************************************************************
www.WebInvent.com * www.Costume-Con.org * www.hawkeswood.com
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 511 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/9/2004
Subject: CC-22
Hope everyone is recovering nicely.
seems we’re working on getting colds now.
Trudy and Fiona, you did a wonderful job on the con, and I for one had a
great time.

As I comment on things, my intention is just to give ideas to future
con-coms, not pick on you.

Hotel- for the size of the con, it was fine.
we could have fit another 100 people in it just fine.
I really liked the central area layout.
yes I know exhibits were far off, as was one panel room, but overall it was
much better layout than some.
It made it easy to get between panels, ditch out from a panel to see if
it’s your tech time yet, etc..

It seems these days that amenities once you get to the con are more
important than closeness to the airport.
yes there are many folks who don’t drive, and a $35.00 cab ride stinks, but
the availability of food and other stuff outside the hotel within walking
or 5 min. drive, seems like a fair trade-off. and while I don’t like paying
to park where I rent a room, it sure as heck beats the 24.00 per day at
Arisia to park.

Dealers- If there had been more space, more would have been nice, but for
the attendance size, it was good as is.
I’m sure people would like a million dealers there, but then the dealers
don’t make money and it’s not worth it. Trust me, if Janet thought there
was gonna be 600 people there, she’d have been there and paid for the extra
security. but with a small con, there’s only so much pocket money walking
around these days.

Programming.
I know they had trouble getting everything straight till the last minute,
but it worked out all right.
Having panelists know what they’re doing 2-3 months out would be nice, though.
I can talk for an hour about anything whether I have a clue or not; most
people would like to be more prepared than that.
On the good side, once the schedule was set, we found everyone very
accommodating as far as any changes we needed. so much so that I could be
on panels that friends wanted help with, that weren’t originally on my
schedule. And thanks to Kevin for doing the basic makeup, so I could just
do the advanced, which freed me up to help others.

Masquerades- as a percentage of attendance all 3 events were up to snuff,
if you lump in single patterns with the FFS.

Half time- I assume that the con got a deal on the radio folks being there,
since it was so many con-com folks performing. That’s not a comment I would
make on the ICG list, I only make it here as we talk about budgets so
often, and I personally feel that money can be spent elsewhere before live
entertainment, unless it’s too good a deal to pass up. At a regular con,
half time entertainment is important only if you want the crowd to stick
around for awards. That’s not a problem at a CC.
On one hand, it was great to see what all our friends are like as
performers away from us, on the other, it might have been too long. So
what, I guess, the folks who liked it stayed and watched, the folks who
didn’t could spend time relaxing and drinking .
I REALLY liked having fan photography as part of half-time. Sad it won’t
happen like that next year due to the logistics of the stage. Here’s hoping
that even if it’s not on stage, Dan and Charles can organize basically the
same thing out in the theater lobby or somewhere, before we all walk back
to the hotels.

Social- What a blast. It was a theme that was easy to deal with. If you
wanted to go to extremes and make something, great (you know that ol’
pressure to make costumes bit, LOL) or you could just muggle out and look
bewildered. Great atmosphere.
The band was funny. Hard to hang out inside and enjoy your friends with
them playing, but because of the hotel layout, you could be nearby . I hope
that didn’t cost them much $$ and I hope future cons aren’t going to think
that live entertainment is expected.

Con Suite- Everybody enjoyed how overstocked the con suite was. I hope this
wasn’t a budget buster. It was way more than necessary, and again, I hope
that future cons don’t feel obligated to try to have hot food and so much
up there if it’s a money concern. I’m hoping that so many folks sponsoring
the suite helped out with this and it seems that each sponsor left the
leftovers, and we just accrued more food as we went throughout the weekend.

It was only too small because people wanted to watch the videos in the
evenings. Trying to be polite so all can see takes up a bunch of space.
In and out all day, there was plenty of room. not worth paying for a third
room; just for space for the two evenings.

Tech.–Enough bucks for a spot and it would have all been just fine. Sound
worked well, rehearsals weren’t too bad. Odd to not have the MC there for
the SF tech , but I assume he was on panels and such and couldn’t clone
himself, so it’s understandable. He made the effort to talk to everyone
back stage, and I think he did a very good job.

Historic pre-judging. seems like we need X amount of minutes scheduled per
PERSON, not per entry, or some formula in between 5 minutes a group and 5
minutes a person, or something. We gave up and told them we’d be in the
dealer room, call us if you want us.
Deb Salisbury did a GREAT job as the clerk, running around keeping track of
a schedule gone wacky and letting folks know what’s up.

Hope this is taken as constructive ideas, we had a great time overall. On
the personal fun scale, it’s in our top 5

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 512 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Changing the deadline for bidding for all future bids…
Hi, folks!

I just checked the site, and I never posted the deadline for CC26’s bid.
After discussing the ramifications with Karen and Ricky, it’s my feeling
that we’re making it too hard on ourselves for figuring out the date of
deadline for bid materials. Setting the date at September 30 of each
year gives every bid at least 90 days prior to the start of the con to
circulate its information so that when bidding occurs the site selection
materials reach everyone. And the date is fixed, so each year the
deadline will be the same. Since we’re hearing about bids another five
years out (at least!), this should simplify the process some.

To that end, the ConStitution will be updated shortly to reflect this
change.

I’ve already talked to Kevin and Andy, to warn them.

I’ve also just uploaded what I have so far for CC22, but I have a few
more things to change – which may be done tonight or in the next day or so.

I’m up too late again tonight.

Questions? Fire away!

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 513 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Participants and awards (incomplete) for CC22
Hi, folks!

You can now find the info on the masquerades (no pictures yet) on the
Costume-ConNections site.

As always, if you notice an omission, error or other, please let me know
ASAP!

See: http://www.costume-con.org/CClink/lists.shtml

(Yes, I know this is just a URL – I’ll post the lists in plain text
sometime after I get the Fashion Folio/Single Pattern stuff!

Right now, I gotta go to BED!

Thanks!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 514 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Bruce’s comments on Ricky’s review

I’ve got my own con-goer’s review in the works (contributed to by a number
of people — not just my viewpoint), but I thought I’d add my experience to
Ricky’s for this list.

> Hotel- for the size of the con, it was fine.
> we could have fit another 100 people in it just fine.
> I really liked the central area layout.

I noticed this too. CC25’s will be laid out this way as well. I also made
a mental note to perhaps try to put all the various bid tables,
registration, etc, closer together, somewhat like at CC21. I think having
them all out there in the central area, along with all the costumed people
passing each other back and forth, would lend more of a sense of creative
energy, if you know what I mean.

> It seems these days that amenities once you get to the con are more
> important than closeness to the airport.

Yes, well, there’s that whole thing about having to pay more at a hotel
that’s close to the airport….

> yes there are many folks who don’t drive, and a $35.00 cab ride stinks,

but

> the availability of food and other stuff outside the hotel within walking
> or 5 min. drive, seems like a fair trade-off. and while I don’t like

paying

> to park where I rent a room, it sure as heck beats the 24.00 per day at
> Arisia to park.

Ow. Yeah. Our only beef was that it would have been nice to have the $5 a
day info sooner than the last PR.

>
> Dealers- If there had been more space, more would have been nice, but for
> the attendance size, it was good as is.
> I’m sure people would like a million dealers there, but then the dealers
> don’t make money and it’s not worth it. Trust me, if Janet thought there
> was gonna be 600 people there, she’d have been there and paid for the

extra

> security. but with a small con, there’s only so much pocket money walking
> around these days.

Well, the potential for Chicago being bigger must have been the driving
factor, because I don’t think 21 was much bigger. Just an observation.

> Programming.
> I know they had trouble getting everything straight till the last minute,
> but it worked out all right.
> Having panelists know what they’re doing 2-3 months out would be nice,

though.

> I can talk for an hour about anything whether I have a clue or not; most
> people would like to be more prepared than that.

Yeah, we found out we were on panels and no one told us until we mentioned
that we noticed it. And then I forgot about responding (this was a couple
of weeks out, mind you). We probably would have been more than willing to
do more panels if we’d been contacted about what we could do, rather than
just someone looking over the previous year’s programming and sliding us in
that way.

> I personally feel that money can be spent elsewhere before live
> entertainment, unless it’s too good a deal to pass up. At a regular con,
> half time entertainment is important only if you want the crowd to stick
> around for awards. That’s not a problem at a CC.
> On one hand, it was great to see what all our friends are like as
> performers away from us, on the other, it might have been too long. So
> what, I guess, the folks who liked it stayed and watched, the folks who
> didn’t could spend time relaxing and drinking .

No insult intended to the folks involved, but for us personally, the
halftime entertainment
after the Historical was WAY too long. I found out why later, during the
con post-mortem, but
nonetheless, it was an interminably long time with the fan photos AND the
show. At least the fans had something to do, taking pictures, so they were
on their feet. the saving grace is, like any genre, people were more
forgiving and seemed to enjoy the show because it was people they knew.

> I REALLY liked having fan photography as part of half-time.

Unless I’m mistaken, Trudy and Fiona borrowed this concept from Archon, and
yes, it seems to go over very well. The only problem one can encounter is
if the stage is very high. Archon’s is raised rather high, so the angle is
not as good as it was here.

> Social- What a blast. It was a theme that was easy to deal with. If you
> wanted to go to extremes and make something, great (you know that ol’
> pressure to make costumes bit, LOL) or you could just muggle out and look
> bewildered. Great atmosphere.

Even though I “muggled it” (didn’t really have anything appropriate, so I
was one of the few Muggles there), this was probably one of the most
successful Socials I seen, participation-wise.

> The band was funny. Hard to hang out inside and enjoy your friends with
> them playing, but because of the hotel layout, you could be nearby . I

hope

> that didn’t cost them much $$ and I hope future cons aren’t going to think
> that live entertainment is expected.

Chances are we won’t, but it does point to the importance of having music of
some sort to lend a little atmosphere to the theme.

> Con Suite- Everybody enjoyed how overstocked the con suite was. I hope

this

> wasn’t a budget buster. It was way more than necessary, and again, I hope
> that future cons don’t feel obligated to try to have hot food and so much
> up there if it’s a money concern. I’m hoping that so many folks sponsoring
> the suite helped out with this and it seems that each sponsor left the
> leftovers, and we just accrued more food as we went throughout the

weekend.

This definitely raised the bar on quality of hospitality. I can tell you
having protein (wings, pizza rolls, mostaccioli, cheese, etc.) served was
appreciated by a number of people. While I don’t think we’ll be going that
far, I have passed on to our Hospitality guy that he has a challenge.

> Tech.–Enough bucks for a spot and it would have all been just fine. Sound
> worked well, rehearsals weren’t too bad. Odd to not have the MC there for
> the SF tech , but I assume he was on panels and such and couldn’t clone
> himself, so it’s understandable. He made the effort to talk to everyone
> back stage, and I think he did a very good job.

> Historic pre-judging. seems like we need X amount of minutes scheduled per
> PERSON, not per entry, or some formula in between 5 minutes a group and 5
> minutes a person, or something. We gave up and told them we’d be in the
> dealer room, call us if you want us.

I can tell you what happened here and cover two subjects at once. I was
being judged early-on on Saturday, so I missed the first hour or two. I was
there at the rehearsals almost all of the rest of the time. Sorry I missed
you guys. One of the main reasons for the judging delays was because we had
such a large group.

I’ll hit this a little more on the general review, but here are the bullets:

1. Assign a schedule for the judges.

2. Judges shouldn’t blame the participants for delays. Pre-registration
should have helped anticipate problems.

3. The judges didn’t follow the format regarding awards for workmanship,
documentation and presentation. We thought the precedent was set at 18.
Was this a one time event?

That’s it from me/us.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 515 From: Karen Heim Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Re: Participants and awards (incomplete) for CC22

Note on Historical Masquerade – After the Rain: the two Hillens are
Rachel and Genie (you perhaps heard her proper first name, which is
Eugenia – but definitely NOT Jeanine). Also, Karen McFerran constructed
an outfit, but did not appear in the presentation.

Note on Doll Show: I know Steve and Cathy can look a bit stiff, but I
assure you they were the creators of the outfits for the Jedi Mouster
and Pandawan Learner, not vice versa.

Karen

Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Hi, folks!
>
> You can now find the info on the masquerades (no pictures yet) on the
> Costume-ConNections site.
>
> As always, if you notice an omission, error or other, please let me know
> ASAP!
>
> See: http://www.costume-con.org/CClink/lists.shtml
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 516 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/10/2004
Subject: Re: CC-22

Ricky (and others who post reviews here) –

With your permission, I would like to pass these on to the folks on the rest
of the committee (who aren’t already on this list).

I’m either getting a cold of the pollen is really getting to me. Since I
went out and worked in the yard yesterday and have been hanging laundry out
everyday since we go home, I’m betting on the pollen. The front porch floor
is yellow…

Some comments in reply –

The band on Friday night were friends and former collegues of Fiona and
Alton’s from the Georgia Renaissance Festival. They agreed to play in
exchange for the chance to sell tapes and CD’s.

The Radio Theatre group also performed for free in exchange for the right to
sell tapes and CD’s. We had originally planned a two-part play performed
during each half-time. When our writer died unexpectedly, we decided to go
with Fiona’s play and do it on Sunday because of the theme. Since people
had objected last year to having the winners announced during breaks of Iron
Costumer, we waited until it was over to annouce them. Also, as actors, you
don’t want to break the flow of the play. Of course, we were also trying to
fit in Fan Photo and the auctions to benefit the archives. Probably too
much, in retrospect. We didn’t feel that we had anyone with the time and
energy to do something like Iron Costumer, so we went with what we had. We
were very pleased with the audience response, but understand that the
contestants were anxious for the results.

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] CC-22
>Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 22:42:39 -0400
>
>Hope everyone is recovering nicely.
>seems we’re working on getting colds now.
>Trudy and Fiona, you did a wonderful job on the con, and I for one had a
>great time.
>
>As I comment on things, my intention is just to give ideas to future
>con-coms, not pick on you.
>
>Hotel- for the size of the con, it was fine.
>we could have fit another 100 people in it just fine.
>I really liked the central area layout.
>yes I know exhibits were far off, as was one panel room, but overall it was
>much better layout than some.
>It made it easy to get between panels, ditch out from a panel to see if
>it’s your tech time yet, etc..
>
>It seems these days that amenities once you get to the con are more
>important than closeness to the airport.
>yes there are many folks who don’t drive, and a $35.00 cab ride stinks, but
>the availability of food and other stuff outside the hotel within walking
>or 5 min. drive, seems like a fair trade-off. and while I don’t like paying
>to park where I rent a room, it sure as heck beats the 24.00 per day at
>Arisia to park.
>
>Dealers- If there had been more space, more would have been nice, but for
>the attendance size, it was good as is.
>I’m sure people would like a million dealers there, but then the dealers
>don’t make money and it’s not worth it. Trust me, if Janet thought there
>was gonna be 600 people there, she’d have been there and paid for the extra
>security. but with a small con, there’s only so much pocket money walking
>around these days.
>
>Programming.
>I know they had trouble getting everything straight till the last minute,
>but it worked out all right.
>Having panelists know what they’re doing 2-3 months out would be nice,
>though.
>I can talk for an hour about anything whether I have a clue or not; most
>people would like to be more prepared than that.
>On the good side, once the schedule was set, we found everyone very
>accommodating as far as any changes we needed. so much so that I could be
>on panels that friends wanted help with, that weren’t originally on my
>schedule. And thanks to Kevin for doing the basic makeup, so I could just
>do the advanced, which freed me up to help others.
>
>Masquerades- as a percentage of attendance all 3 events were up to snuff,
>if you lump in single patterns with the FFS.
>
>Half time- I assume that the con got a deal on the radio folks being there,
>since it was so many con-com folks performing. That’s not a comment I would
>make on the ICG list, I only make it here as we talk about budgets so
>often, and I personally feel that money can be spent elsewhere before live
>entertainment, unless it’s too good a deal to pass up. At a regular con,
>half time entertainment is important only if you want the crowd to stick
>around for awards. That’s not a problem at a CC.
>On one hand, it was great to see what all our friends are like as
>performers away from us, on the other, it might have been too long. So
>what, I guess, the folks who liked it stayed and watched, the folks who
>didn’t could spend time relaxing and drinking .
>I REALLY liked having fan photography as part of half-time. Sad it won’t
>happen like that next year due to the logistics of the stage. Here’s hoping
>that even if it’s not on stage, Dan and Charles can organize basically the
>same thing out in the theater lobby or somewhere, before we all walk back
>to the hotels.
>
>Social- What a blast. It was a theme that was easy to deal with. If you
>wanted to go to extremes and make something, great (you know that ol’
>pressure to make costumes bit, LOL) or you could just muggle out and look
>bewildered. Great atmosphere.
>The band was funny. Hard to hang out inside and enjoy your friends with
>them playing, but because of the hotel layout, you could be nearby . I hope
>that didn’t cost them much $$ and I hope future cons aren’t going to think
>that live entertainment is expected.
>
>Con Suite- Everybody enjoyed how overstocked the con suite was. I hope this
>wasn’t a budget buster. It was way more than necessary, and again, I hope
>that future cons don’t feel obligated to try to have hot food and so much
>up there if it’s a money concern. I’m hoping that so many folks sponsoring
>the suite helped out with this and it seems that each sponsor left the
>leftovers, and we just accrued more food as we went throughout the weekend.
>
>It was only too small because people wanted to watch the videos in the
>evenings. Trying to be polite so all can see takes up a bunch of space.
>In and out all day, there was plenty of room. not worth paying for a third
>room; just for space for the two evenings.
>
>Tech.–Enough bucks for a spot and it would have all been just fine. Sound
>worked well, rehearsals weren’t too bad. Odd to not have the MC there for
>the SF tech , but I assume he was on panels and such and couldn’t clone
>himself, so it’s understandable. He made the effort to talk to everyone
>back stage, and I think he did a very good job.
>
>Historic pre-judging. seems like we need X amount of minutes scheduled per
>PERSON, not per entry, or some formula in between 5 minutes a group and 5
>minutes a person, or something. We gave up and told them we’d be in the
>dealer room, call us if you want us.
>Deb Salisbury did a GREAT job as the clerk, running around keeping track of
>a schedule gone wacky and letting folks know what’s up.
>
>Hope this is taken as constructive ideas, we had a great time overall. On
>the personal fun scale, it’s in our top 5
>
>Ricky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page � FREE
download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 517 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/11/2004
Subject: Re: CC-22
Just a few quick, personal comments:

1. The Social was the most fun I’ve had (watching and participating) in
quite some time. I was very impressed, not just with the layout of the
room, but with the effort the majority of participants put into their
party attire.

2. To the hotel’s credit, when we pointed out that it took less than
five minutes to unstop our toilet once Engineering made it to our room
in the morning, they graciously removed two nights from our bill. And
when we checked out, the desk clerk failed to charge us for parking.
Yeah, we didn’t get our extra towels – apparently they’re running on
very short supply.

3. I only noticed two tech glitches (one light, one sound), and neither
one affected the show.

4. Yeah, the radio show timing might have been better. It’s my
suggestion that if you choose to run a main tent show during half time,
delaying the start of it for the fan photos may not be the best choice.
I’d have reversed the process, and allowed the photos after the show, or
out in the hall during it.

5. While I’m very grateful to the con for arranging the second Puppetry
tour, we were the only ones to attend it (Barb, Erin, Katie and I). I’m
sorry that the information about the change in date of my panel wasn’t
communicated – I only had two people attend and they weren’t planning to
do it originally. A method for announcing changes to the program should
be established before the start of the con to avoid that sort of
problem. (It wasn’t a big deal – I don’t know if people were planning to
attend the panel in the original slot.)

6. Dan sez he was disappointed that the Regency Dance was cancelled, but
I have to be honest that I didn’t miss it myself, and…well…Dan
wasn’t actually “there” for the weekend…

I’d be fishing for an official review of the con for the newsletter, but
I won’t have room to print it until the July issue at the earliest. If
someone wants to provide me with something in the 400-500 word range for
that issue, that’d be cool.

It’s a tribute to the quality of the weekend that by Sunday night I was
SOOO exhausted I couldn’t stay up to SMOC. In fact, I think this is the
first time in almost 20 years of CCs that I hit the bed before 11:30pm
on a Sunday, and I’ve been known in the past to greet the dawn. (Right,
Pierre?)

In fact, I’m still recovering – it’s a good thing I haven’t had much in
the way of billable work to do (in a quirky sort of way) because I
really needed to catch up on sleep.

Oh, and one more comment: I LOVE having the ICG meeting on Friday. If I
had a choice, I’d like to see it stay that way.

Thanks for a GREAT TIME!

Cheers,

Betsy



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 518 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/12/2004
Subject: CC22 review
This is the version of the SLUT review more tailored for the Runacc list.
You will find different info on this one, so you might want to read the
ICG-D version also. I preface this review by saying that I’m the
mouthpiece — the review reflects an group opinion. No malice is meant, but
if it was a totally glowing report, everyone would suspect something.

So.

Let’s start at the beginning with the CC22 website. There was some
disappointments here. As of this year, a larger percentage of people were
finding out about the con or seeking info via the Internet. Yet, the
convention website was not being regularly updated. Also, all the
masquerade entry forms were formatted in PDF. Since you couldn’t register
online with them, there didn’t seem to be much point to them.

A few glaring errors in regards to the Folio: The list of Folio members was
not kept up to date online — thereby defeating its purpose. Apparently
the contact address for Nora, the Folio Show Director, was not correct, nor
were the sponsors of the prizes for the show. I believe corrections were
sent via e-mail in January, but they were not posted on the website until
the beginning of this month.

Once we got to the con:

We understand there were serious problems with the site location. We were
willing to cut a lot of slack on this factor. As a convention facility, it
was pretty good. Having the meeting rooms all in one area was a plus. I
made a mental note that perhaps having the various registration and bid
tables etc., closer together might be better from a creative energy level
standpoint. Something for CC25 to consider. It would have been nice to
have more lounge furniture in that area. The hotel’s location was good,
with plenty of places to eat within easy walking distance. As others have
mentioned, towels and toilet paper were a somewhat rare commodity at times.
We also understand that some guests had the locks on their doors
re-configured in the middle of the weekend, so they couldn’t get into their
rooms. What was up with that?

“Housekeeping has gone home” (after 6:00 pm?) was apparently the excuse du
jour for the shortage of towels and toilet paper. Great cost cutting
measure, there, guys. Oh, and the little $1.80 charge we had on our bill
(mentioned on the D list)? We had to go to the gift shop to get the person
to take it off. Sadly, either she was clueless or was not real good on
English. There were hand-written notes of charges (??) and quite plainly the
$1.80 we couldn’t account for was right there, credited to room 555, not
533, but this was apparently not a concept she could quite grasp. She even
turned the pages back to February at one point (say what?). Nonetheless,
once we went back to the front desk and said it was wrong, the charge was
taken off. Not a big deal, just the principle of the thing.

We were pleased to see the Con Suite open on Thursday evening. It allowed
us to unwind and pick up most of our membership packets.

Friday:

Holding the ICG meeting on Friday morning was perceived by many to be a good
thing, rather than waiting to hold it on Monday. The only down side to this
was we were there way too long. Combined with the Board meeting beforehand
for an hour, that meant a total of 3 hours of discussions. My ears only
stopped bleeding a day or so ago.

Registration for the con seemed well organized and adequately staffed. The
computer database they were using for membership appeared to work well.
The Dealers Room, while small, was open on time. Exhibits were not.

The Friday Night Social:

Of all the socials we’ve attended, this appeared to be one of the most
successful on record. It allowed everyone to participate, even if one came
as a Muggle. The refreshments were plentiful – always a plus. There were
very few negatives:
While most liked the band, it interfered with the “social” aspect of the
event, forcing people either to yell at each other or leave the room. Also,
the lights were so low that it was hard to see people’s costumes.

Saturday:

Tech rehearsals for the SF & F masq were well organized and ran smoothly.
The SF & F masquerade ran relatively smoothly, also. The crew pretty much
knew what they were doing. It was good to see Sue Kulinyi and Eric Cannon
again, after having last worked with them at CC16.

I saw only minor problems – the speakers were a bit loud at times. I
understand that people were fairly pleased with my turn as MC. There could
have been more ninjas, but this was just indicative of the lightly attended
convention. Some said that perhaps the ninjas were inexperienced and not
very helpful at times with getting people off-stage.

In both the SF & F and Historical masqs, it was observed that the Stage
Manager was behind on some cues, causing a few late sound and/or light cues
along the way. It seems that during the planning, no one had given thought
to wrangling the individual costumers onto the stage for their fan photog
moments. I was pleased to be asked to do it. Also, the handing out of the
awards hadn’t quite been worked out, so I suggested that Fiona and I
tag-team handing them to the winners.

The Green Room was cramped, but we understand it was the only space
available. Nonetheless, I’ve been told that the dens could have been better
arranged, and there would have been some room to place a den or so behind
the official photography area. Also, while we realize that they are
necessary for parents, baby strollers should be kept out of the aisles where
people are trying to get back and forth in the room. The Green Room for
both nights of the masqs was run with the usual professionalism, but the
repair table was blocked by the narrow aisles full of people and a single
large den. There were not enough mirrors, and they were frequently hogged
by a few people. Good grub, though.

Too bad about the stage problems, including the pipe and drape (see other
review).

A suggestion has been made that the video people be given some sort of
paperwork in the future to allow them to know where and when entries are
made, so things aren’t missed.

Sunday:

A thumbs up to the committee for publishing a reminder about daylight
savings time in the program, as well as making announcements repeatedly the
night before.

One nice thing about having the tech rehearsal and then having the costumers
stay in the Green Room until the Folio show was that it allowed people to
relax a bit before actually going on stage. Folks might want to take note
of this in the future.

Thoughts on the Single Pattern contest: This was not as well organized. The
person in charge did not have good communications, and then we understand
they could not come at the last minute. Apparently we got a notification
via email on the day we left – after we’d already taken our computer to the
repair shop – so we had no clue tthere was a problem until we got to
Atlanta. A little sooner notification would have been nice.

Historical judging suggestions:

1. The Masquerade Director should assign a schedule for the judges, rather
than depend on them to finish in a timely manner. With that in mind.

2. Be realistic about the time required for judging each participant, not
each entry. Sometimes the judges didn’t take very long, but others took
longer.

3. the Masq Director shouldn’t blame the participants for delays. We know
our group, the Rainbow Cavaliers, took a lot of time and it set the judging
back a bit (forcing some judging to be done in a central room), but this
should have been anticipated when we pre-registered. And even though our
group took roughly 90 minutes to get through, with 14 people that only
averaged 7-8 minutes each.

4. The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re: Workmanship,
Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation award a
one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.

On the plus side, we were really glad to be able to be judged in our rooms,
even if it was a group of us in a room at a time. It was less like a Board
Exam. Also, the judges were quite thorough, asking good questions.

Taking myself completely out of these next comments, I have been told the MC
seemed less confident and made several mispronunciation mistakes. I don’t
know whose fault it was, but one or two names were left off the credits for
our presentation, even though we took pains to make sure that they weren’t.

The biggest gripe for us was intermission between the masquerade and the
awards. While the radio play was apparently of high caliber, it was way too
long for the amount of time involved. People in corsets or other
restrictive clothing shouldn’t kept waiting that long. Sure, you can tell
them to feel free to change, but the audience likes to see the costume that
won. If it were me, while it might have caused problems, the play should
have been truncated at the very least, or completely stricken when it was
obvious how long it would be before awards would be read. And let’s not
forget the accompanying announcements, which added even more time.

The Con Suite: We understand that there was some sort of bait-and-switch
with the hotel so that it wasn’t very big. Not the concom’s fault. The
guys who ran this raised the bar for standards of supply. Real food with
protein (like chicken wings!) was greatly appreciated. We would have liked
to have seen more vegetables, though.

Showing costume movies as entertainment background in the con suite has
certain drawbacks. While it’s a good idea on paper, it tends to suck
attention spans and conversation right out of the room. This is especially
so when the audio is up very loud. So, if you wanted to have a nice
conversation in that room, you (and the person who you are conversing with)
had to talk over the audio and fight getting distracted by what was on TV.
I have a suggestion if future cons continue this idea – how about a video of
BIS or highlights of either past International entries or of the host city’s
regional masquerade?

Finally, we were a bit uncomfortable with the way the presentation of the
ICG Lifetime Achievement Award was handled. Yes, there are people who have
been overlooked for this recognition, but to say so publicly lessened the
honor to both of this year’s recipients. In addition, since these mentions
closely followed the subject of a posthumous award, at least one person
gasped aloud because they thought the implication was that one or the other
of these deserving people had died. We know that was not the intention.
Anyone who wasn’t familiar with the presenter and the intent of the
posthumous award might not have understood the context.

Overall, we had a pretty good time, even if some of us didn’t get to see
many of the panels, due to certain commitments. We welcome those organizers
to the “Never Again” club and look forward to the day when the do it again.

 

Group: runacc Message: 519 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>As others have mentioned, towels and toilet paper were a somewhat rare
>commodity at times.

This did not happen to us personally, but we know others had problems.

Because we have long hair, and because I have severe skin allergies to the
detergents used to wash hotel linens, we always bring at least one bath
towel each in self-defense.

But it shouldn’t be a problem to get toilet paper or towels, agreed.

>We also understand that some guests had the locks on their doors
>re-configured in the middle of the weekend, so they couldn’t get into their
>rooms. What was up with that?

This has happened at other conventions many times. It’s the just the
irritation of getting the cards re-programmed.

I was at one LunaCon where the battery in the card reader in the door
failed, and hotel security had to break us into our room with a crowbar.
Then we had to leave somebody in the room at all times because the door was
broken and the hotel had no rooms available for a transfer. So it could
have been worse.

>One nice thing about having the tech rehearsal and then having the costumers
>stay in the Green Room until the Folio show was that it allowed people to
>relax a bit before actually going on stage. Folks might want to take note
>of this in the future.

Only one comment here. Cait and I had to miss Tech Rehearsal for the
Historical because we were getting into hair, makeup, and costume for the
Future Fashion Show dress rehearsal. And neither Cait nor I could sit down
in our FFS entries without getting (as my 8th grade Home Ec teacher would
have called it) “rump-sprung,” so we stood from the time we got into
costume until the FFS was over. I would rather have done the FFS rehearsal
to get the blocking, then gone back to my room and changed, then come back
and done the show. Just MHO.

Maybe most people don’t do both the FFS and the Historical (but both Ricky
and I have, multiple times), but keep in mind that this could be an issue.

>Be realistic about the time required for judging each participant, not
>each entry.

Amen.

>And even though our
>group took roughly 90 minutes to get through, with 14 people that only
>averaged 7-8 minutes each.

Not unreasonable for detailed costumes.

>The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re: Workmanship,
>Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation award a
>one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.

The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either masquerade.
Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.

It is my understanding that awards for documentation are at the discretion
of the judges.
I wasn’t a judge, so I can’t speak for them. I’m sure they would be happy
to comment re documentation if someone would ask them.

It is also the judges’ discretion to roll Workmanship and Presentation into
one set of awards if they so choose. The Historical has always been an odd
animal in that Workmanship (and documenting what you’re doing) has always
been weighted more heavily than on-stage presentation (at least since
Costume-Con 1, where a flamboyant stage presentation trumped thousands of
hours of research and handwork, and after the howls of protest died down,
the whole process got re-thought). Therefore, an extremely accurate costume
with a very mediocre presentation may end up being Best-In-Show. The
Historical has always been very hard to gauge from an audience point of
view, as the audience does not get to see the documentation and costumes up
close the way the judges do.

>Taking myself completely out of these next comments, I have been told the MC
>seemed less confident and made several mispronunciation mistakes. I don’t
>know whose fault it was, but one or two names were left off the credits for
>our presentation, even though we took pains to make sure that they weren’t.

As a first-time MC, the MC is allowed some mistakes as part of the learning
process.
If the same mistakes are being made by the same MC after several
masquerades, then it is time to make radical course corrections.

Without first-time MCs, we will never have trained replacements for other
popular MCs when they retire.

>The guys who ran this raised the bar for standards of supply. Real food with
>protein (like chicken wings!) was greatly appreciated. We would have liked
>to have seen more vegetables, though.

To me, anything beyond drinks and chips is gravy. Greatly appreciated (like
chicken wings!), but not expected.

Larger conventions can afford to have “real food” in the con suite and feed
their staff out of it all weekend. Costume-Con just hasn’t been that large
lately.

At CC-6, once we had gotten LOTS of walk-in memberships, we immediately
upgraded con suite fare and asked the hotel to put out coffee and tea
services on the con floor as a “thank you” and immediate benefit to our
members.

–Karen (and Ricky)

 

Group: runacc Message: 520 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC22 review

>
> As a first-time MC, the MC is allowed some mistakes as part of the
learning
> process.
> If the same mistakes are being made by the same MC after several
> masquerades, then it is time to make radical course corrections.
>
> Without first-time MCs, we will never have trained replacements for other
> popular MCs when they retire.

As a second-timer, I agree, although the impressin I got is that this was
not his first time. I stand corrected if I’m wrong.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 521 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, casamai (Bruce, I think) wrote:
>> The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re:
>> Workmanship,
>> Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation
>> award a
>> one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.
>
> The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either
> masquerade.
> Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.

The MD should provide judging instructions to the panel. These should
be clear, short and simple. I concur that the instructions should not
mandate or dictate anything more than that the judges are expected to
be fair and impartial in their deliberations.

> It is my understanding that awards for documentation are at the
> discretion
> of the judges.
> I wasn’t a judge, so I can’t speak for them. I’m sure they would be
> happy
> to comment re documentation if someone would ask them.

I know the judges considered giving a “Best Documentation” award but
chose not to. I probably shouldn’t have admitted knowing this, but I
think in this group we can keep to the general discussion. If anybody
wants any more specific information, they need to speak to the judges
(I don’t have more specific information, so don’t ask me). Don’t
expect, though, to get any comments from the judges on anything but
your own entry.

From an MD’s perspective, I would include a line in the judging
instructions encouraging the judges to award a “Best Documentation”
award (as I did for BIS for last year’s F&SF), but nothing stronger.

> It is also the judges’ discretion to roll Workmanship and Presentation
> into
> one set of awards if they so choose. The Historical has always been an
> odd
> animal in that Workmanship (and documenting what you’re doing) has
> always
> been weighted more heavily than on-stage presentation (at least since
> Costume-Con 1, where a flamboyant stage presentation trumped thousands
> of
> hours of research and handwork, and after the howls of protest died
> down,
> the whole process got re-thought). Therefore, an extremely accurate
> costume
> with a very mediocre presentation may end up being Best-In-Show. The
> Historical has always been very hard to gauge from an audience point of
> view, as the audience does not get to see the documentation and
> costumes up
> close the way the judges do.

I’m going to go simpler on this one.

In F&SF competition there are two panels of judges. Workmanship judges
grant workmanship awards. Presentation judges grant presentation
awards.

In Historical competition, one panel of judges does both pre-judging
(workmanship) and show judging (presentation). Makes it much more
difficult for the judges to compartmentalize their opinions on
workmanship separately from presentation.

They’re also judging to two different standards. In historical
recreation, workmanship and documentation must weigh very heavily when
choosing a best-in-show. In historical interpretation, workmanship and
documentation may weigh equally with presentation.

Rather than mandating separate workmanship and presentation awards, MDs
need to give historical judges the freedom to grant awards not just for
workmanship and presentation, but also for a combination of the two
since they are directly observing both. Again, something for the
judging instructions…

“If an entry’s merit is primarily found in workmanship or presentation,
the award name should include ‘workmanship award’ or ‘presentation
award.’ If an entry shows excellence in both spheres, please do not
include ‘workmanship’ or ‘presentation’ in the name.”

“Since the goal of a historical recreation entry should be the faithful
recreation of an actual garment using period materials and techniques,
workmanship and documentation are of paramount importance when
selecting Best Recreation in Division/Show.”


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 522 From: martingear Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
>
>
>>At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, casamai (Bruce, I think) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re:
>>>Workmanship,
>>>Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation
>>>award a
>>>one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.
>>>
>>>
>>The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either
>>masquerade.
>>Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.
>>
>>
>
>The MD should provide judging instructions to the panel. These should
>be clear, short and simple. I concur that the instructions should not
>mandate or dictate anything more than that the judges are expected to
>be fair and impartial in their deliberations.
>
>

<snip>

The only area in which I disagree with Andy is that as MD for the
Historical I would, and did, insist that the judges base their ratings
of the costumes (particularly the recreations) on the documentation
submitted… not what they “know” about the source period, place, etc.
Having watched three panels of Historic judges (not recently) play
oneupsmanship with each other to the detriment of the contestants that
is one area in which I feel strongly the MD has the right to insist.

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 523 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

On Apr 13, 2004, at 6:38 PM, martingear wrote:

> The only area in which I disagree with Andy is that as MD for the
> Historical I would, and did, insist that the judges base their ratings
> of the costumes (particularly the recreations) on the documentation
> submitted… not what they “know” about the source period, place, etc.
> Having watched three panels of Historic judges (not recently) play
> oneupsmanship with each other to the detriment of the contestants that
> is one area in which I feel strongly the MD has the right to insist.

Point taken. That’s definitely a situation to avoid.

We almost need a handbook for historical judging alone. Between
ensuring the judges know how to interpret footnotes and identify
primary and secondary sources (after all, an Elizabethan based on Janet
Arnold would likely be more accurate than an Elizabethan based on a
Victorian reference source or a theatrical costuming book) and the
issue of avoiding personal knowledge bugaboos, it’s definitely tricky.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 524 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/13/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

>Bruce, You may not be wrong, tho I’m pretty sure it was his first CC at least.

I’m usually more nervous doing a historic as MC than anything else. Names
of contestants would hopefully be easy compared to the different languages
and odd names of techniques or other outdated verbage I’m not used to.

My High School German teacher would be amazed at some of the stuff I’ve
managed to get through.

Yes anybodies names messed up is painful and to be avoided, but I thought
Ron did a nice job overall. ( as did you)

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 525 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review
Andy–

Good comments re the Historical.

This year’s judges also commented that they would like to see a panel on
what constitutes good Historical Masquerade documentation, with examples
given, but I’m not sure it would do any good if it were held at the same
convention where people were competing with their documentation already set
(and no way to make changes). Maybe there eventually needs to be something
on-line that potential competitors could view in advance to get ideas…?

I really hope someone solicits the CC22 judges for their comments re
documentation, because I had a conversation with two of them on Monday
morning while they were waiting to leave for the train station, and they
could readily describe several types of common documentation flaws using
only a couple of sentences for each.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 526 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

I’ve never before directed a Historical and have agreed to do so at both CC
24 and 25. Consequently, I am taking particular interest in this
discussion.

I believe the award of separate documentation, presentation, and workmanship
awards originated at CC 16. I believe that this was a decision by the
judges’ panel, not the Masquerade Director. I do not recall whether more
recent panels have followed that pattern in awards at the Historical but, in
any event, the pattern is fairly new — no more than six years old in an
event that now is 22 years old.

Some patterns persist and become custom; others wither for one reason or
another. This is a good time to discuss the pros and cons of which way this
pattern should go, especially since the discussion is likely to affect the
Historical at two of the next three CCs!

Please continue,

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC22 review

>
> On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> > At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, casamai (Bruce, I think) wrote:
> >> The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re:
> >> Workmanship,
> >> Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation
> >> award a
> >> one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.
> >
> > The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either
> > masquerade.
> > Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.
>
> The MD should provide judging instructions to the panel. These should
> be clear, short and simple. I concur that the instructions should not
> mandate or dictate anything more than that the judges are expected to
> be fair and impartial in their deliberations.
>
> > It is my understanding that awards for documentation are at the
> > discretion
> > of the judges.
> > I wasn’t a judge, so I can’t speak for them. I’m sure they would be
> > happy
> > to comment re documentation if someone would ask them.
>
> I know the judges considered giving a “Best Documentation” award but
> chose not to. I probably shouldn’t have admitted knowing this, but I
> think in this group we can keep to the general discussion. If anybody
> wants any more specific information, they need to speak to the judges
> (I don’t have more specific information, so don’t ask me). Don’t
> expect, though, to get any comments from the judges on anything but
> your own entry.
>
> From an MD’s perspective, I would include a line in the judging
> instructions encouraging the judges to award a “Best Documentation”
> award (as I did for BIS for last year’s F&SF), but nothing stronger.
>
> > It is also the judges’ discretion to roll Workmanship and Presentation
> > into
> > one set of awards if they so choose. The Historical has always been an
> > odd
> > animal in that Workmanship (and documenting what you’re doing) has
> > always
> > been weighted more heavily than on-stage presentation (at least since
> > Costume-Con 1, where a flamboyant stage presentation trumped thousands
> > of
> > hours of research and handwork, and after the howls of protest died
> > down,
> > the whole process got re-thought). Therefore, an extremely accurate
> > costume
> > with a very mediocre presentation may end up being Best-In-Show. The
> > Historical has always been very hard to gauge from an audience point of
> > view, as the audience does not get to see the documentation and
> > costumes up
> > close the way the judges do.
>
> I’m going to go simpler on this one.
>
> In F&SF competition there are two panels of judges. Workmanship judges
> grant workmanship awards. Presentation judges grant presentation
> awards.
>
> In Historical competition, one panel of judges does both pre-judging
> (workmanship) and show judging (presentation). Makes it much more
> difficult for the judges to compartmentalize their opinions on
> workmanship separately from presentation.
>
> They’re also judging to two different standards. In historical
> recreation, workmanship and documentation must weigh very heavily when
> choosing a best-in-show. In historical interpretation, workmanship and
> documentation may weigh equally with presentation.
>
> Rather than mandating separate workmanship and presentation awards, MDs
> need to give historical judges the freedom to grant awards not just for
> workmanship and presentation, but also for a combination of the two
> since they are directly observing both. Again, something for the
> judging instructions…
>
> “If an entry’s merit is primarily found in workmanship or presentation,
> the award name should include ‘workmanship award’ or ‘presentation
> award.’ If an entry shows excellence in both spheres, please do not
> include ‘workmanship’ or ‘presentation’ in the name.”
>
> “Since the goal of a historical recreation entry should be the faithful
> recreation of an actual garment using period materials and techniques,
> workmanship and documentation are of paramount importance when
> selecting Best Recreation in Division/Show.”
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen

 

Group: runacc Message: 527 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Thanks, Byron! I was trying to recall at which CC the decision was made.
If it wasn’t CC16 then it was CC17. Janet Wilson Anderson was part of
the panel of judges.

It’s been in my list of things to do to reproduce the competition rules
from all the CCs on the list. I’m near to the end of the process of
adding competition photos. Perhaps I should concentrate on the rules next?

In any case, I have the programs from all but one – CC4 – and can
provide viewing time or copies (with a small fee for reproducing and
mailing them) to anyone who asks prior to having the data online.

One word of caution – we’re taking steps to pack up our house in advance
of putting it on the market, and while the materials are here, they may
be packed up temporarily, and thus unavailable for viewing until after
we move.

Just an FYI: We’ve already written one contract (beaten out by an
escalation clause of $3k, when ours was only $2.1k, so moving may take
some time…).

Cheers,

Betsy

Byron Connell wrote:

> I’ve never before directed a Historical and have agreed to do so at both CC
> 24 and 25. Consequently, I am taking particular interest in this
> discussion.
>
> I believe the award of separate documentation, presentation, and workmanship
> awards originated at CC 16. I believe that this was a decision by the
> judges’ panel, not the Masquerade Director. I do not recall whether more
> recent panels have followed that pattern in awards at the Historical but, in
> any event, the pattern is fairly new — no more than six years old in an
> event that now is 22 years old.
>
> Some patterns persist and become custom; others wither for one reason or
> another. This is a good time to discuss the pros and cons of which way this
> pattern should go, especially since the discussion is likely to affect the
> Historical at two of the next three CCs!
>
> Please continue,
>
> Byron
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] CC22 review
>
>
>
>>On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, casamai (Bruce, I think) wrote:
>>>
>>>>The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re:
>>>>Workmanship,
>>>>Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation
>>>>award a
>>>>one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.
>>>
>>>The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either
>>>masquerade.
>>>Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.
>>
>>The MD should provide judging instructions to the panel. These should
>>be clear, short and simple. I concur that the instructions should not
>>mandate or dictate anything more than that the judges are expected to
>>be fair and impartial in their deliberations.
>>
>>
>>>It is my understanding that awards for documentation are at the
>>>discretion
>>>of the judges.
>>>I wasn’t a judge, so I can’t speak for them. I’m sure they would be
>>>happy
>>>to comment re documentation if someone would ask them.
>>
>>I know the judges considered giving a “Best Documentation” award but
>>chose not to. I probably shouldn’t have admitted knowing this, but I
>>think in this group we can keep to the general discussion. If anybody
>>wants any more specific information, they need to speak to the judges
>>(I don’t have more specific information, so don’t ask me). Don’t
>>expect, though, to get any comments from the judges on anything but
>>your own entry.
>>
>> From an MD’s perspective, I would include a line in the judging
>>instructions encouraging the judges to award a “Best Documentation”
>>award (as I did for BIS for last year’s F&SF), but nothing stronger.
>>
>>
>>>It is also the judges’ discretion to roll Workmanship and Presentation
>>>into
>>>one set of awards if they so choose. The Historical has always been an
>>>odd
>>>animal in that Workmanship (and documenting what you’re doing) has
>>>always
>>>been weighted more heavily than on-stage presentation (at least since
>>>Costume-Con 1, where a flamboyant stage presentation trumped thousands
>>>of
>>>hours of research and handwork, and after the howls of protest died
>>>down,
>>>the whole process got re-thought). Therefore, an extremely accurate
>>>costume
>>>with a very mediocre presentation may end up being Best-In-Show. The
>>>Historical has always been very hard to gauge from an audience point of
>>>view, as the audience does not get to see the documentation and
>>>costumes up
>>>close the way the judges do.
>>
>>I’m going to go simpler on this one.
>>
>>In F&SF competition there are two panels of judges. Workmanship judges
>>grant workmanship awards. Presentation judges grant presentation
>>awards.
>>
>>In Historical competition, one panel of judges does both pre-judging
>>(workmanship) and show judging (presentation). Makes it much more
>>difficult for the judges to compartmentalize their opinions on
>>workmanship separately from presentation.
>>
>>They’re also judging to two different standards. In historical
>>recreation, workmanship and documentation must weigh very heavily when
>>choosing a best-in-show. In historical interpretation, workmanship and
>>documentation may weigh equally with presentation.
>>
>>Rather than mandating separate workmanship and presentation awards, MDs
>>need to give historical judges the freedom to grant awards not just for
>>workmanship and presentation, but also for a combination of the two
>>since they are directly observing both. Again, something for the
>>judging instructions…
>>
>>”If an entry’s merit is primarily found in workmanship or presentation,
>>the award name should include ‘workmanship award’ or ‘presentation
>>award.’ If an entry shows excellence in both spheres, please do not
>>include ‘workmanship’ or ‘presentation’ in the name.”
>>
>>”Since the goal of a historical recreation entry should be the faithful
>>recreation of an actual garment using period materials and techniques,
>>workmanship and documentation are of paramount importance when
>>selecting Best Recreation in Division/Show.”
>>
>>–
>>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 528 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/14/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Marty —

I agree with you. The documentation should be the basis for decisions, not
what a judge believes he or she is expert on. I know of some “expert”
opinions about uniforms that bear little relation to either the official
uniform requirements or the reality of uniforms as actually worn .

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “martingear” <MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC22 review

> Andrew T Trembley wrote:
>
> >On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>At 08:55 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, casamai (Bruce, I think) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>The MD needs to enforce the Historical judging format (re:
> >>>Workmanship,
> >>>Documentation and Presentation). Was the idea of a documentation
> >>>award a
> >>>one-time thing? I thought a precedent had been set.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The MD should not be dictating anything to any judges in either
> >>masquerade.
> >>Judging the masquerade is not in the MD’s job description.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The MD should provide judging instructions to the panel. These should
> >be clear, short and simple. I concur that the instructions should not
> >mandate or dictate anything more than that the judges are expected to
> >be fair and impartial in their deliberations.
> >
> >
> <snip>
>
> The only area in which I disagree with Andy is that as MD for the
> Historical I would, and did, insist that the judges base their ratings
> of the costumes (particularly the recreations) on the documentation
> submitted… not what they “know” about the source period, place, etc.
> Having watched three panels of Historic judges (not recently) play
> oneupsmanship with each other to the detriment of the contestants that
> is one area in which I feel strongly the MD has the right to insist.
>
> ^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 529 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

In a message dated 4/14/04 6:32:40 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> This year’s judges also commented that they would like to see a panel on
> what constitutes good Historical Masquerade documentation, with examples
> given, but I’m not sure it would do any good if it were held at the same
> convention where people were competing with their documentation already set
> (and no way to make changes). Maybe there eventually needs to be something
> on-line that potential competitors could view in advance to get ideas…?

Karen,
That is great idea! Especially since I have Historical Masq ideas. I
hope its not too late to see this added for CC23.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 530 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> This year’s judges also commented that they would like to see a panel
> on what constitutes good Historical Masquerade documentation, with
> examples given, but I’m not sure it would do any good if it were held
> at the same convention where people were competing with their
> documentation already set (and no way to make changes). Maybe there
> eventually needs to be something on-line that potential competitors
> could view in advance to get ideas…?

Let’s see… what would I like to see in documentation for a Historical
recreation entry?

I’d like to see a picture or two of the garment being recreated,
whether we’re talking a photos of garments in museums or reproductions
of period artworks.

I’d like to see a paragraph or two on period materials (fabric, thread,
and ornaments) used to make this sort of garment, or that was used in
the original garment. This ought to also include differences between
modern and period names for materials (taffeta being a good example).

I’d like to see a paragraph or two about patterning and cutting in
period, including whether pieces were cut on-grain, against-grain or on
the bias in period garments.

I’d like to see a paragraph or two (with supporting pictures, if
possible) about period construction techniques; i.e. what sort of
stitching and tailoring techniques were used.

In some cases, supporting documentation about sumptuary laws (if such
existed) help explain the nature of a period garment.

In some cases, supporting documentation about international trade at
the time can help explain the nature of a period garment.

What would you like to see in historical recreation documentation?

>


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 531 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Byron Connell wrote:

> Marty —
> I agree with you. The documentation should be the basis for
> decisions, not
> what a judge believes he or she is expert on. I know of some “expert”
> opinions about uniforms that bear little relation to either the
> official
> uniform requirements or the reality of uniforms as actually worn .

There are things to watch for in documentation.

The most important thing is proper identification of source material.
While one may not know much about a particular period or culture, it’s
often easy to identify dubious sources.

Primary sources, of course, are preferred. Judy Mitchell’s exhaustive
research of actual garments in Scandanavia is the prime example, but
not within reach of everybody. Art from within period is another easy
one (assuming that realistic art was period), and anybody with access
to a library can find exhibit and collection catalogs from museums
around the world.

Secondary sources are trickier. While some of us know how to identify
dubious secondary sources, in most cases that’s within particular
areas. I’m always suspicious of Victorian sources used to document
previous periods.

The question, though, is how to judge this.

If as a judge, I believe that source material isn’t reliable, do I
still judge the costume based on the docs and hold my concerns for
documentation judging? This is an important question when judging a
historical recreation.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 532 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Byron Connell wrote:

> Marty —
> I agree with you. The documentation should be the basis for
> decisions, not
> what a judge believes he or she is expert on. I know of some “expert”
> opinions about uniforms that bear little relation to either the
> official
> uniform requirements or the reality of uniforms as actually worn .

There are things to watch for in documentation.

The most important thing is proper identification of source material.
While one may not know much about a particular period or culture, it’s
often easy to identify dubious sources.

Primary sources, of course, are preferred. Judy Mitchell’s exhaustive
research of actual garments in Scandanavia is the prime example, but
not within reach of everybody. Art from within period is another easy
one (assuming that realistic art was period), and anybody with access
to a library can find exhibit and collection catalogs from museums
around the world.

Secondary sources are trickier. While some of us know how to identify
dubious secondary sources, in most cases that’s within particular
areas. I’m always suspicious of Victorian sources used to document
previous periods.

The question, though, is how to judge this.

If as a judge, I believe that source material isn’t reliable, do I
still judge the costume based on the docs and hold my concerns for
documentation judging? This is an important question when judging a
historical recreation.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 533 From: martingear Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

><snip>
>

The question, though, is how to judge this.

>If as a judge, I believe that source material isn’t reliable, do I
>still judge the costume based on the docs and hold my concerns for
>documentation judging? This is an important question when judging a
>historical recreation.
>

I’m going to preface this by saying that the following is strictly my
opinion, and other Historic MD’s are under no obligation to even
consider it in any other light. (No flames please!)

Unless the judges have, in their opinions, a good reason to believe that
the documentation was faked, Yes! Everyone has not been taught how to
do proper research and if the costumer believes that the research was
accurate and the garment is constructed in accord with the research
presented, then the garment should be judged strictly against the
documentation. This is why I favor strongly a separate judging and
award for documentation in the historic masquerade. (And why we gave
Dany a documentation award in the F&S-F masquerade.)

In the two most egregious examples of bad judging that spring to mind,
both entries were extremely well documented citing multiple reputable
sources and at least one of them went to primary source materials (I
can’t remember if the other did or not… it was 19 years ago but we
could ask Jacqui Ward) In both cases, the judges involved “knew”
something that wasn’t so, and the costumers suffered as a result. This
is why if I ever were to run a historic masquerade again (ghod forbid) I
would insist on the above.

YMMV –

Marty

PS – I too would like to see the things that Andy asked for in
documentation, but were we to get all that regularly, we should look
into becoming a degree granting university.

 

Group: runacc Message: 534 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review

Bruce —

Do you know whether they were referring to ninjas back stage or to green
room crew? The green room was short staffed for both the SF&F and
Historical masquerades (especially the latter), for which everyone has my
apology. Some persons I thought I had recruited for Saturday night never
showed up. The size of the Historical took me by surprise, on the other
hand; I had not worked to recruit additional green room staff for it. Not
only were there no mothers’ helpers for either green room but we actually
were short of den moms for both of them. I didn’t even have a check-in
clerk for the Historical; I did the job myself. Fortunately, virtually
everybody in that masquerade arrived promptly, so I didn’t have to worry
about the possibly of scratching entries.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review

> I’ll have to leave that to those who made the comment. I’m just relaying
> said message.
>
> Bruce
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: <ACatelli@manafortbrothers.com>
> To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:37 AM
> Subject: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review
>
>
> >
> > > From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> > >
> > > As usual, the SLUTs on the “Short Bus” put
> > > together our annual (or at least when we can get to a CC) review of
the
> > > convention while on our way back home. I preface this review by
saying
> > that
> > > I’m the mouthpiece — the review reflects the aggregate opinions of
> those
> > > present at the time, along with a few other folks at the end of the
> > convention.
> > >
> > > There could have been more ninjas, but this was just indicative of the
> > lightly
> > > attended convention.
> >
> > How so, more ninjas?
> >
> > No, seriously, I was head ninja (such a surprise to regular CC
> > attendees-not).
> >
> > The only place I thought I could’ve put ninjas that I didn’t was in back
> of
> > stage so no one fell off the back, since curtains don’t do much to
prevent
> > falls.
> >
> >
> > Six-seven ninjas on a crew seemed fine to me.
> >
> >
> > and, of course, in the ever-popular evaluation–no one fell off, so they
> > were good shows.
> > : )
> >
> > Ann in CT

 

Group: runacc Message: 535 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

I agree with Marty, especially about the idea that costumers might not have
the research skills to ferret out poor, not to mention totally bogus,
sources. For Napoleonic era uniforms, there are the highly accurate
contemporary drawings and paintings of Charles Hamilton Smith (for the
British) and Carle Vernet (for the French). But there also are “authentic”
contemporary depictions by artists (especially in France) who had a ready
market and vivid imaginations but who had never seen any of the troops they
were depicting!

Joe Costumer may not be able to separate these “sources” from Hamilton Smith
and Vernet. After all, they’re all contemporaries. Consequently, he would
wind up reproducing a garment that never existed, except in the artist’s
contemporary depiction. In that case, the documentation would provide
evidence of the faithfulness of the costume to the work of art and that’s
what the entry should be judged on, IMHO.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “martingear” <MartinGear@comcast.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC22 review

> Andrew T Trembley wrote:
>
> ><snip>
> >
> The question, though, is how to judge this.
>
> >If as a judge, I believe that source material isn’t reliable, do I
> >still judge the costume based on the docs and hold my concerns for
> >documentation judging? This is an important question when judging a
> >historical recreation.
> >
>
> I’m going to preface this by saying that the following is strictly my
> opinion, and other Historic MD’s are under no obligation to even
> consider it in any other light. (No flames please!)
>
> Unless the judges have, in their opinions, a good reason to believe that
> the documentation was faked, Yes! Everyone has not been taught how to
> do proper research and if the costumer believes that the research was
> accurate and the garment is constructed in accord with the research
> presented, then the garment should be judged strictly against the
> documentation. This is why I favor strongly a separate judging and
> award for documentation in the historic masquerade. (And why we gave
> Dany a documentation award in the F&S-F masquerade.)
>
> In the two most egregious examples of bad judging that spring to mind,
> both entries were extremely well documented citing multiple reputable
> sources and at least one of them went to primary source materials (I
> can’t remember if the other did or not… it was 19 years ago but we
> could ask Jacqui Ward) In both cases, the judges involved “knew”
> something that wasn’t so, and the costumers suffered as a result. This
> is why if I ever were to run a historic masquerade again (ghod forbid) I
> would insist on the above.
>
> YMMV –
>
> Marty
>
> PS – I too would like to see the things that Andy asked for in
> documentation, but were we to get all that regularly, we should look
> into becoming a degree granting university.

 

Group: runacc Message: 536 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

On Apr 15, 2004, at 5:31 PM, Byron Connell wrote:

> I agree with Marty, especially about the idea that costumers might not
> have
> the research skills to ferret out poor, not to mention totally bogus,
> sources. For Napoleonic era uniforms, there are the highly accurate
> contemporary drawings and paintings of Charles Hamilton Smith (for the
> British) and Carle Vernet (for the French). But there also are
> “authentic”
> contemporary depictions by artists (especially in France) who had a
> ready
> market and vivid imaginations but who had never seen any of the troops
> they
> were depicting!

That’s actually a risk with any visual representation that isn’t a
photograph of an actual period garment with very clear provenance. Many
renaissance nobles appeared in portraits “wearing” clothes created by
the artist that never existed other than as oil paint.

I don’t have an argument with people basing designs on bogus period
sources; the source itself is legitimately historical even if the
garment it describes never existed. I doubt I’d ding somebody in that
case. I’d actually probably give extra credit to somebody who
identified that a real historical source had bogus content and entered
something based on it as a recreation of a historical fantasy.

I’m more concerned (and I know this is nitpicking) with bogus
out-of-period sources, such as discredited pop anthropologists.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 537 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

At 05:55 PM 4/15/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>I’d actually probably give extra credit to somebody who
>identified that a real historical source had bogus content and entered
>something based on it as a recreation of a historical fantasy.

Kayta Martz always wanted to make some of the Victorian fancy dress ball /
theatrical representations of Queen Elizabeth, Tudor Ladies, etc. that bore
NO resemblance to the actual period garments they were representing (1890
in underpinnings and silhouette vs. 1500’s). Actually kind of an
interesting idea, and could be documented from several sources.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 538 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

On Apr 15, 2004, at 6:12 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> At 05:55 PM 4/15/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>> I’d actually probably give extra credit to somebody who
>> identified that a real historical source had bogus content and entered
>> something based on it as a recreation of a historical fantasy.
>
> Kayta Martz always wanted to make some of the Victorian fancy dress
> ball /
> theatrical representations of Queen Elizabeth, Tudor Ladies, etc. that
> bore
> NO resemblance to the actual period garments they were representing
> (1890
> in underpinnings and silhouette vs. 1500’s). Actually kind of an
> interesting idea, and could be documented from several sources.

Deb Salisbury at CC17 did a Victorian Fancy Dress Ball Harem Girl.
Totally wrong harem girl (complete with bustle) but perfect victorian
interpretation.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 539 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Hotel Contracts
We have a CC25 committee meeting coming up this Saturday, and one of the
things we’ll be discussing with them is the hotel contract. I have the
hotel’s version (4 pages) and Marty’s epic <g>. I’d like to run the
proposal past Marty and others here who have had hotel experience and get
pointers. One of my main questions is: how do I work the CC contract
smoothly into the mix at this point, since we haven’t signed anything yet,
but have their proposal in hand? If possible, I’d like to get feedback
before tomorrow Saturday evening.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 540 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review

I’ll have to ask. I think backstage, particularly.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>; <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:19 PM
Subject: [runacc] Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review

> Bruce —
>
> Do you know whether they were referring to ninjas back stage or to green
> room crew? The green room was short staffed for both the SF&F and
> Historical masquerades (especially the latter), for which everyone has my
> apology. Some persons I thought I had recruited for Saturday night never
> showed up. The size of the Historical took me by surprise, on the other
> hand; I had not worked to recruit additional green room staff for it. Not
> only were there no mothers’ helpers for either green room but we actually
> were short of den moms for both of them. I didn’t even have a check-in
> clerk for the Historical; I did the job myself. Fortunately, virtually
> everybody in that masquerade arrived promptly, so I didn’t have to worry
> about the possibly of scratching entries.
>
> Byron
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review
>
>
> > I’ll have to leave that to those who made the comment. I’m just
relaying
> > said message.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > —– Original Message —–
> > From: <ACatelli@manafortbrothers.com>
> > To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:37 AM
> > Subject: [ICG-D] Ninjas? re: CC22 Review
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> > > >
> > > > As usual, the SLUTs on the “Short Bus” put
> > > > together our annual (or at least when we can get to a CC) review of
> the
> > > > convention while on our way back home. I preface this review by
> saying
> > > that
> > > > I’m the mouthpiece — the review reflects the aggregate opinions of
> > those
> > > > present at the time, along with a few other folks at the end of the
> > > convention.
> > > >
> > > > There could have been more ninjas, but this was just indicative of
the
> > > lightly
> > > > attended convention.
> > >
> > > How so, more ninjas?
> > >
> > > No, seriously, I was head ninja (such a surprise to regular CC
> > > attendees-not).
> > >
> > > The only place I thought I could’ve put ninjas that I didn’t was in
back
> > of
> > > stage so no one fell off the back, since curtains don’t do much to
> prevent
> > > falls.
> > >
> > >
> > > Six-seven ninjas on a crew seemed fine to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > and, of course, in the ever-popular evaluation–no one fell off, so
they
> > > were good shows.
> > > : )
> > >
> > > Ann in CT
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 541 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts

On Apr 15, 2004, at 7:19 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> One of my main questions is: how do I work the CC contract
> smoothly into the mix at this point, since we haven’t signed anything
> yet,
> but have their proposal in hand? If possible, I’d like to get feedback
> before tomorrow Saturday evening.

Magic words:

“This is our national organization’s model contract.”


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 542 From: David Doering Date: 4/15/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts

>
>On Apr 15, 2004, at 7:19 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > One of my main questions is: how do I work the CC contract
> > smoothly into the mix at this point, since we haven’t signed anything
> > yet,
> > but have their proposal in hand? If possible, I’d like to get feedback
> > before tomorrow Saturday evening.

I also received Marty’s disc at Atlanta, long after we had started our
contract negotiations with the Marriott. Our sales manager had no problem
looking at our model contract when we said the magic words “this is the
national organization’s model contract which we want to work from. Would
you look it over to see if it meets our needs?”

I actually think our sales manager was grateful to get a well-written
document. The stuff she had to work from looked like a butcher job from a
dozen different kinds of events and quite different styles of writing. She
seemed actually embarrassed when I pointed out how one of her
“cut-and-paste” contract provisions _prohibited_ us from showing the hotel
_map_ to anyone!

Dave Doering
Chair
CC23: Utah
www.cc23.org
REMEMBER: April 24th is the last day for the $65 rate!

 

Group: runacc Message: 543 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/16/2004
Subject: Re: CC22 review

We just had this discussion a couple of days ago with a local costumer
who hasn’t competed in the Historical before. There was confusion over
what made an interpretation different from a reproduction (a discussion
that’s cropped up from time to time over the history of the con).

The way I learned it, the only primary source is the garment itself.
Anything not actually a garment or piece of costume is an artistic
representation. Even a photo can be deceptive, or misrepresent “history.”

Seeing the way the rules are worded for the Historical Masquerades over
time, it’s clear that the subject is wide open to interpretation, at the
whim of the masquerade director. I don’t know that this is a bad thing,
but it sure makes it hard to determine consistent guidelines for
directors to use when creating the rules.

When judges then have to interpret the rules, it can get even more
confusing.

As I recall (fuzzy though my memory might be) at the CC during which the
judges first decided to split the awards into documentation, workmanship
and presentation, they simply chose to ignore the rules of the
masquerade, opting to award as they saw fit.

Which leads me to think that it’s most important for the director to
select judges who can be trusted to understand and interpret the rules
as set forth, since that’s what the entrants expect to comply with.

How detailed should we be with providing guidance on the subject?

(Trying to draw the conversation back to producing a public document…)

Betsy

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

> Primary sources, of course, are preferred. Judy Mitchell’s exhaustive
> research of actual garments in Scandanavia is the prime example, but
> not within reach of everybody. Art from within period is another easy
> one (assuming that realistic art was period), and anybody with access
> to a library can find exhibit and collection catalogs from museums
> around the world.



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 544 From: martingear Date: 4/16/2004
Subject: Re: Hotel Contracts

Bruce –
I’d be happy to read what the hotel has given you and give you my
comments. Andy and David have pretty much given you the magic words.
Telling the hotel that this is a national organization’s model contract
tells the hotel that someone has dealt with hotels before and has gotten
that agreement accepted. (True!) If the hotel balks then suggest that
you start with the national contract and “tweak it” where necessary
incorporating their concerns, but imply that you expect that the
necessary changes will be minor. The contract is actually written
fairly for both parties, and it does cover many of things that most
hotels don’t even think about, but are very important to Costume Cons.
If the hotel refuses absolutely to start with your contract then be
afraid, very afraid. The fact that they have given you a proposal and
you are now bringing in your own contract can be explained by telling
the hotel that you have just returned from CC-22 where you won the bid
and were given the model contract by the national organization. (O.K.,
so you got it from me… pretend this once that I represent the national
organization 🙂 )

Marty

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>We have a CC25 committee meeting coming up this Saturday, and one of the
>things we’ll be discussing with them is the hotel contract. I have the
>hotel’s version (4 pages) and Marty’s epic <g>. I’d like to run the
>proposal past Marty and others here who have had hotel experience and get
>pointers. One of my main questions is: how do I work the CC contract
>smoothly into the mix at this point, since we haven’t signed anything yet,
>but have their proposal in hand? If possible, I’d like to get feedback
>before tomorrow Saturday evening.
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 545 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
Future concoms should give some thought to handling dealers the way some
East Coast S/F and clown conventions are doing it lately: hotel rooms are
blocked into a “Dealer’s Row” on the same floor as, and preferably near,
the con suite. Dealers deal out of their hotel rooms, so they can set their
own hours (and maybe a dealer such as AlterYears would be able to get a
suite in order to maximize their space). Charge is a nominal fee over the
price of the hotel room so the con gets its cut.

Most of these conventions have a regular dealer’s room as well, but I can
see advantages to going 100% to the Dealer’s Row format–it frees up
breakout rooms or ballroom space for other con programming. Since space is
usually at a premium at CC, this could be a Very Good Thing.
(Also solves the eternal problem of finding a space large enough for
AlterYears.)

Ricky and I did the “Dealer’s Row” thing at Arisia and LunaCon this year,
and it was very successful, especially considering we were frequently
closed because we were on programming, in competitions, etc. It also gives
conventioneers something else to do late at night besides hanging out in
the con suite (sort of spreads the party around).

Just a thought, as we’re all thinking about hotel contracts and trying to
get enough space, etc.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 546 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

And one further consideration in favor of this arrangement:

Security becomes the problem of the dealers, not the conference.

In a shared Dealer Room area, someone has to be sure that nothing walks
overnight. You can plant someone in the room overnight for security, or
hire someone to watch the space. I know we had some issues at CCXV, and
I think there were also some problems with locks on the doors at CC22.

I’d be interested in hearing what Devra Langsam might have to say about
such an arrangement, since Poison Pen Press is more or less a fixture at
CCs.

Cheers,

Betsy
Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Future concoms should give some thought to handling dealers the way some
> East Coast S/F and clown conventions are doing it lately: hotel rooms are
> blocked into a “Dealer’s Row” on the same floor as, and preferably near,
> the con suite. Dealers deal out of their hotel rooms, so they can set their
> own hours (and maybe a dealer such as AlterYears would be able to get a
> suite in order to maximize their space). Charge is a nominal fee over the
> price of the hotel room so the con gets its cut.
>
> Most of these conventions have a regular dealer’s room as well, but I can
> see advantages to going 100% to the Dealer’s Row format–it frees up
> breakout rooms or ballroom space for other con programming. Since space is
> usually at a premium at CC, this could be a Very Good Thing.
> (Also solves the eternal problem of finding a space large enough for
> AlterYears.)
>
> Ricky and I did the “Dealer’s Row” thing at Arisia and LunaCon this year,
> and it was very successful, especially considering we were frequently
> closed because we were on programming, in competitions, etc. It also gives
> conventioneers something else to do late at night besides hanging out in
> the con suite (sort of spreads the party around).
>
> Just a thought, as we’re all thinking about hotel contracts and trying to
> get enough space, etc.
>
> –Karen
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 547 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers
I was working a one-time con in Chicago that did it Dealers like that. I
thought it was pretty neat. It was kind of weird going through them to get to my
hotel room, though. Especially since it was an Adult SF con!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 548 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

As a costume / corset dealer, I LOVE it. With a room with a bathroom,
people can try on stuff and not leave the dealer’s domain. (I still
recommend having more than one set of eyes to watch the room at any given
time.) I also like being able to set our own hours.

I don’t know Devra all that well–anybody else have a closer relationship
where they could possibly ask?

–Karen

At 08:57 AM 4/17/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>And one further consideration in favor of this arrangement:
>
>Security becomes the problem of the dealers, not the conference.
>
>In a shared Dealer Room area, someone has to be sure that nothing walks
>overnight. You can plant someone in the room overnight for security, or
>hire someone to watch the space. I know we had some issues at CCXV, and
>I think there were also some problems with locks on the doors at CC22.
>
>I’d be interested in hearing what Devra Langsam might have to say about
>such an arrangement, since Poison Pen Press is more or less a fixture at
>CCs.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Betsy
>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> > Future concoms should give some thought to handling dealers the way some
> > East Coast S/F and clown conventions are doing it lately: hotel rooms are
> > blocked into a “Dealer’s Row” on the same floor as, and preferably near,
> > the con suite. Dealers deal out of their hotel rooms, so they can set
> their
> > own hours (and maybe a dealer such as AlterYears would be able to get a
> > suite in order to maximize their space). Charge is a nominal fee over the
> > price of the hotel room so the con gets its cut.
> >
> > Most of these conventions have a regular dealer’s room as well, but I can
> > see advantages to going 100% to the Dealer’s Row format–it frees up
> > breakout rooms or ballroom space for other con programming. Since space is
> > usually at a premium at CC, this could be a Very Good Thing.
> > (Also solves the eternal problem of finding a space large enough for
> > AlterYears.)
> >
> > Ricky and I did the “Dealer’s Row” thing at Arisia and LunaCon this year,
> > and it was very successful, especially considering we were frequently
> > closed because we were on programming, in competitions, etc. It also gives
> > conventioneers something else to do late at night besides hanging out in
> > the con suite (sort of spreads the party around).
> >
> > Just a thought, as we’re all thinking about hotel contracts and trying to
> > get enough space, etc.
> >
> > –Karen
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>–
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 549 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

She’ll be at Balticon, and I’ve agreed to be there for Marty, so I can
try to remember and ask her then.

-b

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> I don’t know Devra all that well–anybody else have a closer relationship
> where they could possibly ask?
>
> –Karen



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 550 From: martingear Date: 4/17/2004
Subject: Re: Dealers

While I think that the concept of a “Dealers’ Row” is wonderful. (Love
it at Arisia) some hotels will not approve. I ran into that at the
Baltimore Marriott when we were looking at the possibility of moving
Balticon there several year ago. I don’t want to throw cold water on
the idea, just giving everyone a heads up.

^M^

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>As a costume / corset dealer, I LOVE it. With a room with a bathroom,
>people can try on stuff and not leave the dealer’s domain. (I still
>recommend having more than one set of eyes to watch the room at any given
>time.) I also like being able to set our own hours.
>
>I don’t know Devra all that well–anybody else have a closer relationship
>where they could possibly ask?
>
>–Karen
>
>At 08:57 AM 4/17/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>And one further consideration in favor of this arrangement:
>>
>>Security becomes the problem of the dealers, not the conference.
>>
>>In a shared Dealer Room area, someone has to be sure that nothing walks
>>overnight. You can plant someone in the room overnight for security, or
>>hire someone to watch the space. I know we had some issues at CCXV, and
>>I think there were also some problems with locks on the doors at CC22.
>>
>>I’d be interested in hearing what Devra Langsam might have to say about
>>such an arrangement, since Poison Pen Press is more or less a fixture at
>>CCs.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Betsy
>>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Future concoms should give some thought to handling dealers the way some
>>>East Coast S/F and clown conventions are doing it lately: hotel rooms are
>>>blocked into a “Dealer’s Row” on the same floor as, and preferably near,
>>>the con suite. Dealers deal out of their hotel rooms, so they can set
>>>
>>>
>>their
>>
>>
>>>own hours (and maybe a dealer such as AlterYears would be able to get a
>>>suite in order to maximize their space). Charge is a nominal fee over the
>>>price of the hotel room so the con gets its cut.
>>>
>>>Most of these conventions have a regular dealer’s room as well, but I can
>>>see advantages to going 100% to the Dealer’s Row format–it frees up
>>>breakout rooms or ballroom space for other con programming. Since space is
>>>usually at a premium at CC, this could be a Very Good Thing.
>>>(Also solves the eternal problem of finding a space large enough for
>>>AlterYears.)
>>>
>>>Ricky and I did the “Dealer’s Row” thing at Arisia and LunaCon this year,
>>>and it was very successful, especially considering we were frequently
>>>closed because we were on programming, in competitions, etc. It also gives
>>>conventioneers something else to do late at night besides hanging out in
>>>the con suite (sort of spreads the party around).
>>>
>>>Just a thought, as we’re all thinking about hotel contracts and trying to
>>>get enough space, etc.
>>>
>>>–Karen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>–
>>–
>>Betsy R. Delaney
>>Web Mistress at large
>>
>>************************************************************************
>> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
>> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
>> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>>************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 10 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 10 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 451 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 452 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 453 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 454 From: srabba Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 455 From: martingear Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 456 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 457 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 458 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 459 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 460 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 461 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 462 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 463 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 464 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/13/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 465 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Group: runacc Message: 466 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Formats & Fees
Group: runacc Message: 467 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 468 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 469 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 470 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 471 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 472 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 473 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 474 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 475 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 476 From: martingear Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 477 From: Karen Heim Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 478 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 479 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 480 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: clarification
Group: runacc Message: 481 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 482 From: martingear Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 483 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 484 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 485 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 486 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 487 From: martingear Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 488 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: clarification
Group: runacc Message: 489 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: clarification
Group: runacc Message: 490 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 491 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 492 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: clarification
Group: runacc Message: 493 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: clarification
Group: runacc Message: 494 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 495 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 496 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 497 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Group: runacc Message: 498 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 499 From: Charles Galway Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Group: runacc Message: 500 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 451 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
For the record, I’m actually planning on arriving Wednesday. This Cheesehead
aint never been farther south than St. Louis and Champaign, Illinois!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 452 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Friday morning, breakfast or after the ICG meeting. Either one is fine.
Sunday is jam-packed, but Monday breakfast is possible.

Elaine

_________________________________________________________________
Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar � includes FREE pop-up blocking!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 453 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

I’m flying, and won’t arrive until about 10 p.m. on Thurs.

Elaine

>
>How many of us are arriving Thursday night? An informal chat session was
>really what I had in mind, nothing “programmed” or official.
>
>I don’t know what time we’ll be getting in to the hotel – we’re probably
>stopping somewhere around Raleigh/Durham on the way down, so the days
>are broken into two three-hundred mile chunks.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get business advice and resources to improve your work life, from bCentral.
http://special.msn.com/bcentral/loudclear.armx

 

Group: runacc Message: 454 From: srabba Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Greetings,

Even though CC-24 is still two years off we are busy making plans. I
would very much like to part of a get together. Words of wisdom from
those who’ve been there done that is always valuable. I arrive late
Friday morning and leave Monday evening. Monday breakfast would work
well for me. However, I plan to be a sponge all weekend soaking up
all I can so please share your thoughts and ideas with me anytime.

Sallie Abba
Co-Chair CC-24

 

Group: runacc Message: 455 From: martingear Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22
Bobby and I are driving down but don’t expect to arrive before Friday
afternoon, and we need to leave shortly after breakfast on Monday. That
said, I will be bringing CDs with an annotated version of the Draft
Costume Con hotel contract with me for anyone who wants them (only 11
month late).

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 456 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

On Mar 11, 2004, at 9:57 AM, Elaine Mami wrote:

> I’m flying, and won’t arrive until about 10 p.m. on Thurs.

Flying, hit the airport around 8:30 thursday

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 457 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

Thanks, Marty! I should be able to put your stuff up on the site shortly
after the con, if not before I leave (with my handy, dandy laptop),
making it available to anyone on this list at the very least.

How’s dinner time Friday (brown bag or otherwise) prior to the Friday
Night Social grab people? Or we could try to make several “dates” and
see what develops from that…

If we can’t all meet, I would still like to make sure that the writing
progresses (it hasn’t) so that we can release the document to the public
this spring/summer. This is a VERY USEFUL mailing list, but it isn’t
public, and I’d like to see our work get out there.

If members of the list are willing to take on various sections of the
document for writing, that would make the process easier. I would still
compile it, and make it sound consistent throughout.

Any volunteers? Buehler?

Cheers,

Betsy

martingear wrote:

> Bobby and I are driving down but don’t expect to arrive before Friday
> afternoon, and we need to leave shortly after breakfast on Monday. That
> said, I will be bringing CDs with an annotated version of the Draft
> Costume Con hotel contract with me for anyone who wants them (only 11
> month late).
>
> Marty
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 458 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

In a message dated 3/11/2004 1:25:31 PM Central Standard Time,
gsabba@worldnet.att.net writes:

>
> Even though CC-24 is still two years off we are busy making plans.

Sallie,
You will be suprised how fast those years will fly!
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 459 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

In a message dated 3/11/2004 1:47:42 PM Central Standard Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> I will be bringing CDs with an annotated version of the Draft
> Costume Con hotel contract with me for anyone who wants them (only 11
> month late).

Marty,
Put me down for one!
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 460 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

Friday dinner sound possible.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] RE: Meeting at CC-22

> Thanks, Marty! I should be able to put your stuff up on the site shortly
> after the con, if not before I leave (with my handy, dandy laptop),
> making it available to anyone on this list at the very least.
>
> How’s dinner time Friday (brown bag or otherwise) prior to the Friday
> Night Social grab people? Or we could try to make several “dates” and
> see what develops from that…
>
> If we can’t all meet, I would still like to make sure that the writing
> progresses (it hasn’t) so that we can release the document to the public
> this spring/summer. This is a VERY USEFUL mailing list, but it isn’t
> public, and I’d like to see our work get out there.
>
> If members of the list are willing to take on various sections of the
> document for writing, that would make the process easier. I would still
> compile it, and make it sound consistent throughout.
>
> Any volunteers? Buehler?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Betsy
>
> martingear wrote:
> > Bobby and I are driving down but don’t expect to arrive before Friday
> > afternoon, and we need to leave shortly after breakfast on Monday. That
> > said, I will be bringing CDs with an annotated version of the Draft
> > Costume Con hotel contract with me for anyone who wants them (only 11
> > month late).
> >
> > Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 461 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

Amen.

Trudy

>From: henryosier@cs.com
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] RE: Meeting at CC-22
>Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:29:52 EST
>
>In a message dated 3/11/2004 1:25:31 PM Central Standard Time,
>gsabba@worldnet.att.net writes:
> >
> > Even though CC-24 is still two years off we are busy making plans.
>Sallie,
> You will be suprised how fast those years will fly!
>Henry W. Osier,
>Co-Chair, CC21
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech
Hacks & Scams. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/techsafety.armx

 

Group: runacc Message: 462 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

In a message dated 3/11/2004 7:21:20 PM Central Standard Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> Friday dinner sound possible.

I’ll second that menu!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 463 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/12/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

Sounds good to me, too.

Elaine

> > Friday dinner sound possible.
>I’ll second that menu!

_________________________________________________________________
Frustrated with dial-up? Lightning-fast Internet access for as low as
$29.95/month. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 464 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/13/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

Don’t know exactly when we’ll be available but we arrive Thursday evening
and leave Tuesday Morning. We’ll try and make whatever time is convenient
for everybody else.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Elaine Mami” <ecmami@hotmail.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] RE: Meeting at CC-22

>
>
> Sounds good to me, too.
>
> Elaine
>
> > > Friday dinner sound possible.
> >I’ll second that menu!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Frustrated with dial-up? Lightning-fast Internet access for as low as
> $29.95/month. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 465 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC-22

I posted the following to the ICG-D list in response to Carole’s remarks;
any thoughts here?

Charging to enter the Folio would cost us designers; after all we don’t
charge to enter any of the other masquerades.
The only way to save money on the Folio is in format. I anticipate having to
go to a CD format at some point, and offering a hard copy at an additional
cost to the attendee. I don’t entirely like this idea ’cause I like having a
hard copy to thumb through as much as anyone, but…
Pro:
1. CDs are cheaper to produce & mail.
2. Can store more info, including color!
3. People can print off what they need; individual designs or the entire
thing if they choose.
4. Offering hard-copy at additional cost [outside of membership] would cover
additional cost of producing it.
Cons:
1. Not everyone has computer access in their home. And even if you can
access another computer (such as work or library) they may not have a CD
drive or allow you to use it. [I feel obligated to point out that almost
everyone knows someone with a computer, though].
2. Many people prefer hard-copy, myself included.
Discussion, anyone?

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Carole Parker” <mscip@inreach.com>
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
> I agree that the FFF is important. Something to consider as a
> possibility is to have an “entry fee” for the FFF that would be enough
> to cover the anticipated printing costs. Maybe something like $3-5?
> Would that be enough? I do not honestly think we could go over $10
> without losing too many people and/or designs, though.
>
> Just playing around with the idea. Either that, or we could put a
> paragraph on the entry form that says that the FFF costs so much $$$ to
> print, and would you please make a donation? That way, the people who
> are just squeaking by could enter, and those doing well could send in a
> contribution. Maybe get a tax deduction for anything over $X?

 

Group: runacc Message: 466 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: FFF Formats & Fees
Nora, and all,
The CD idea does have its benefits. The first one that springs to mind
is that it is cheaper. For some reason, the cost of printing them and mailing
them is still stuck in my head. I know that CD blanks are dirt cheap. And
mailing them would also be cheaper. The color drawing element would be
interesting, as well.
A nominal fee of, say, one dollar per entry, would help defer the cost
of producing the folio in any format. Again, I remember the shock of hearing
from Sandy & Pierre the cost of producing ours. Not griping about the cost, I
just wish some had told me really early on to expect it.
I agree with you about your computer access comment. I am always
suprised when my little chug-chug machine does what it supposed to do. Everyone
knows someone with a computer, but going over to someone else’s house just to
cruise a CD can be an inconvenience to the someone else.
The advantage of the hard copy is that you can look at it where and
when you want to do so. You really can’t go out for a relaxing picnic and
casually glance through a CD and write in the margins.
I’d say, to cut costs, put the folio out on CD primarily, with a hard
copy available upon request. That way, a smaller number of Folios would need
to be printed.

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 467 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF

I am cross-posting this because this group needs to consider this (and some
other ideas being raised on ICG-D).

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Carole Parker” <mscip@inreach.com>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

> On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 02:04 PM, Pierre & Sandy Pettinger
> wrote:
>
> > The CC21 folio cost $1300 to print and I had to search for quite
> > awhile to
> > find that good a rate. For awhile it looked like it was going to be
> > $2000.
> > I don’t recall the postage totals since that was split up over time.
> >
> > All that said, I think the Folio is a very important item.
>
> I agree that the FFF is important. Something to consider as a
> possibility is to have an “entry fee” for the FFF that would be enough
> to cover the anticipated printing costs. Maybe something like $3-5?
> Would that be enough? I do not honestly think we could go over $10
> without losing too many people and/or designs, though.
>
> Just playing around with the idea. Either that, or we could put a
> paragraph on the entry form that says that the FFF costs so much $$$ to
> print, and would you please make a donation? That way, the people who
> are just squeaking by could enter, and those doing well could send in a
> contribution. Maybe get a tax deduction for anything over $X?
>
> Until later–
>
> Carole

 

Group: runacc Message: 468 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

> Charging to enter the Folio would cost us designers; after all we don’t
> charge to enter any of the other masquerades.
> The only way to save money on the Folio is in format. I anticipate having
to
> go to a CD format at some point, and offering a hard copy at an additional
> cost to the attendee. I don’t entirely like this idea ’cause I like having
a
> hard copy to thumb through as much as anyone, but…
> Pro:
> 1. CDs are cheaper to produce & mail.
> 2. Can store more info, including color!
> 3. People can print off what they need; individual designs or the entire
> thing if they choose.
> 4. Offering hard-copy at additional cost [outside of membership] would
cover
> additional cost of producing it.
> Cons:
> 1. Not everyone has computer access in their home. And even if you can
> access another computer (such as work or library) they may not have a CD
> drive or allow you to use it. [I feel obligated to point out that almost
> everyone knows someone with a computer, though].
> 2. Many people prefer hard-copy, myself included.
> Discussion, anyone?
>
> Nora
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Carole Parker” <mscip@inreach.com>
> Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
> > I agree that the FFF is important. Something to consider as a
> > possibility is to have an “entry fee” for the FFF that would be enough
> > to cover the anticipated printing costs. Maybe something like $3-5?
> > Would that be enough? I do not honestly think we could go over $10
> > without losing too many people and/or designs, though.
> >
> > Just playing around with the idea. Either that, or we could put a
> > paragraph on the entry form that says that the FFF costs so much $$$ to
> > print, and would you please make a donation? That way, the people who
> > are just squeaking by could enter, and those doing well could send in a
> > contribution. Maybe get a tax deduction for anything over $X?
> >
> > Until later–
> >
> > Carole

 

Group: runacc Message: 469 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Fw: [ICG-D] FFF

—– Original Message —–
From: <victoriandiva@aol.com>
To: <ICG-D@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

> In a message dated 3/14/2004 8:41:54 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> 1. Not everyone has computer access in their home. And even if you can
> access another computer (such as work or library) they may not have a CD
> drive or allow you to use it. [I feel obligated to point out that almost
> everyone knows someone with a computer, though].
> 2. Many people prefer hard-copy, myself included.
> To counter the cons….
>
> 1. According to the last tech survey I saw (from one of the big tech
> nonprofits – NYSIIA I think?), 65% of American homes have computers. Since
2 out of 3
> homes have this technology, it’s pretty safe to discount the issue of
computer
> access as being an “issue” since if you can afford to costume and go to
> costume cons, you probably have a computer. Whether you like to USE it is
a
> different question, as many don’t, but that shouldn’t be a consideration
in
> considering if the technology is widely and readily available (it is).
>
> 2. Vanity publishing on-line is on the rise. Work out a deal with one of
the
> many e-book vanity publishers who specialize in very limited hardcopy
print
> runs, give everyone a code to use in ordering their copy, and those who
want
> the hardcopy version can pay for it directly to the printer. This shifts
the
> financial burden from those who don’t value the hardcopy as much to those
who do
> want to keep the hardcopy version, which is an equitable solution. You can
> even do pre-orders and use those pre-orders to negotiate a lower rate from
the
> publisher and/or take some of the budget and partially underwrite the
print run,
> which will help keep the costs down to the end purchaser. I believe some
of
> these JIT printers do print in color.
>
> my 2 cents
> -shenlei
>
>
> Shenlei Winkler, Executive Director
> New York City Tea Society
> www.nycteasociety.com
> Service Through Playfulness! tm
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 470 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/14/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
It’s been up in the air for a while, but unfortunately, no, I won’t be at
CC22 after all.
To the rest of you, have a great time.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–

Eileen,
Thanks for the reply, even if after all this time! See you in
Atlanta?
Henry

 

Group: runacc Message: 471 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

Eileen –

I’m sorry to hear that you can’t come. Do you need for us to try and sell
your membership? I will miss seeing you again.

Trudy

>From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request
>Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:21:17 -0700
>
>It’s been up in the air for a while, but unfortunately, no, I won’t be at
>CC22 after all.
>To the rest of you, have a great time.
>
>Eileen
>
>
>—–Original Message—–
>
>Eileen,
> Thanks for the reply, even if after all this time! See you in
>Atlanta?
> Henry
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar � includes FREE pop-up blocking!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 472 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

Cliff and I are willing to donate our memberships to the con. If you want
to give them away to someone deserving who otherwise would not be able to
afford to come, you have our blessing.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–
From: Trudy Leonard [mailto:georgialei@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:58 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request

Eileen –

I’m sorry to hear that you can’t come. Do you need for us to try and sell
your membership? I will miss seeing you again.

Trudy

>From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request
>Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:21:17 -0700
>
>It’s been up in the air for a while, but unfortunately, no, I won’t be at
>CC22 after all.
>To the rest of you, have a great time.
>
>Eileen
>
>
>—–Original Message—–
>
>Eileen,
> Thanks for the reply, even if after all this time! See you in
>Atlanta?
> Henry
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar – includes FREE pop-up blocking!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 473 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/15/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

Thank you, guys. That’s very sweet. I hope you can make it to Utah, and
I’ll see you there.

Trudy

>From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request
>Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:21:36 -0700
>
>Cliff and I are willing to donate our memberships to the con. If you want
>to give them away to someone deserving who otherwise would not be able to
>afford to come, you have our blessing.
>
>Eileen
>
>—–Original Message—–
>From: Trudy Leonard [mailto:georgialei@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:58 PM
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request
>
>
>Eileen –
>
>I’m sorry to hear that you can’t come. Do you need for us to try and sell
>your membership? I will miss seeing you again.
>
>Trudy
>
>
> >From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: RE: [runacc] Information Request
> >Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:21:17 -0700
> >
> >It’s been up in the air for a while, but unfortunately, no, I won’t be at
> >CC22 after all.
> >To the rest of you, have a great time.
> >
> >Eileen
> >
> >
> >—–Original Message—–
> >
> >Eileen,
> > Thanks for the reply, even if after all this time! See you in
> >Atlanta?
> > Henry
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar � includes FREE pop-up blocking!
>http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech
Hacks & Scams. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/techsafety.armx

 

Group: runacc Message: 474 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

At 07:33 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:

>Charging to enter the Folio would cost us designers; after all we don’t
>charge to enter any of the other masquerades.
>The only way to save money on the Folio is in format. I anticipate having to
>go to a CD format at some point, and offering a hard copy at an additional
>cost to the attendee. I don’t entirely like this idea ’cause I like having a
>hard copy to thumb through as much as anyone, but…
>Pro:
>1. CDs are cheaper to produce & mail.
>2. Can store more info, including color!
>3. People can print off what they need; individual designs or the entire
>thing if they choose.
>4. Offering hard-copy at additional cost [outside of membership] would cover
>additional cost of producing it.
>Cons:
>1. Not everyone has computer access in their home. And even if you can
>access another computer (such as work or library) they may not have a CD
>drive or allow you to use it. [I feel obligated to point out that almost
>everyone knows someone with a computer, though].
>2. Many people prefer hard-copy, myself included.

(note: the word “you” below is a generic “you”)

Another con. What format are you going to put it in? About the only
universal format will be pdfs. How many of us have the software to create
pdfs? Otherwise you need some type of imbedded program to display the pages.

Again, we, as a group, must be assured that the pages are in a sufficient
resolution to print well.

Also, an advantage of printing is once the folio is compiled, you take it
to the printer to do the work. With CD, someone is going to have to produce
a couple of hundred CDs, with cases. To look at least marginally
professional you will also need to print a jewel case insert and possibly
impress an image on the CD to identify it. All this adds to the cost. I
don’t know that you really gain anything in the long run. In my view its
better to budget the folio into your membership rates just like everything
else.

Pierre

>Discussion, anyone?
>
>Nora
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Carole Parker” <mscip@inreach.com>
>Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
> > I agree that the FFF is important. Something to consider as a
> > possibility is to have an “entry fee” for the FFF that would be enough
> > to cover the anticipated printing costs. Maybe something like $3-5?
> > Would that be enough? I do not honestly think we could go over $10
> > without losing too many people and/or designs, though.
> >
> > Just playing around with the idea. Either that, or we could put a
> > paragraph on the entry form that says that the FFF costs so much $$$ to
> > print, and would you please make a donation? That way, the people who
> > are just squeaking by could enter, and those doing well could send in a
> > contribution. Maybe get a tax deduction for anything over $X?
> >
> > Until later–
> >
> > Carole

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 475 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

More points, comments inserted below;

—– Original Message —–
>From: “Pierre & Sandy Pettinger” <costumrs@radiks.net>
> Another con. What format are you going to put it in? About the only
> universal format will be pdfs.
Jpg’s, rtf’s. Pdf’s are not universal, nor should they be.

>How many of us have the software to create pdfs?
Moot point, bu tmany businesses have it if you have a generous boss who
would let you use their software.

>Otherwise you need some type of imbedded program to display the pages.
Most VCD programs do have embedded encoding to enable play and print
capabilities.

> Again, we, as a group, must be assured that the pages are in a sufficient
> resolution to print well.
Not a problem, a CD can hold very high -res images and in quantity.

> Also, an advantage of printing is once the folio is compiled, you take it
> to the printer to do the work. With CD, someone is going to have to
produce
> a couple of hundred CDs, with cases.
Once created they generally are something that can be inserted and burned
while you do something else, like laundry. Yes it would take some time but
the Folio does in any form.

>To look at least marginally professional you will also need to print a
jewel case >insert and possibly impress an image on the CD to identify it.
All this adds to >the cost. I don’t know that you really gain anything in
the long run. In my >view its better to budget the folio into your
membership rates just like >everything else.
Yeah, but again not too expensive and could be turned into a group activity.
More fun!

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 476 From: martingear Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

My comments –
Pierre & Sandy Pettinger wrote:

><snip>
>Another con. What format are you going to put it in? About the only
>universal format will be pdfs. How many of us have the software to create
>pdfs? Otherwise you need some type of imbedded program to display the pages.
>

The current version of WordPerfect will save documents as PDFs, and
recently I bought a $20.00 add on for MS Word 2000 that does the same
thing, so this should not be an issue.

><snip>
>
>Also, an advantage of printing is once the folio is compiled, you take it
>to the printer to do the work. With CD, someone is going to have to produce
>a couple of hundred CDs, with cases. To look at least marginally
>professional you will also need to print a jewel case insert and possibly
>impress an image on the CD to identify it. All this adds to the cost. I
>don’t know that you really gain anything in the long run. In my view its
>better to budget the folio into your membership rates just like everything
>else.
>
>

Once you have “camera ready” copy for a printer making a CD is trivial.
I don’t think that one would need to print a jewel case insert or for
that matter provide a jewel case. Name brand CDRs cost $0.30 each in
the quantities one would need. add $0.07 for blank labels, and another
$0.10 for paper envelopes (or $0.15 for tyvek) and you end up with a
cost for materials of $0.52 each tops. Add another $0.25 for the cost of
ink or toner and you are still less than $1.00 per folio. An additional
advantage is that you only have to produce the actual quantity that you
need, and each extra copy costs the same amount. Finally, the cost for
mailing a CD is significantly less than for a paper copy. For those
people who don’t own or have ready access to a computer and printer, the
con could provide a laser printed copy at an additional cost, but this
would save the con a significant lump sum early on and keep memberships
at a reasonable level.

Just my $0.02

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 477 From: Karen Heim Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:04:19 -0600
Pierre & Sandy Pettinger <costumrs@radiks.net> wrote:

> In my view its
> better to budget the folio into your membership rates
> just like everything
> else.
>
> Pierre

This is my feeling as well. I am STRONGLY opposed to a
separate entrance fee for Folio designers.

Why? Because the Folio is our introduction to the wider
world of costume/wearable art/fashion design. The internet
has made this competition visible to a large population who
never knew about it before.

Look at the most recent Folio. See how many of the
designers are first-timers? Many of them submitted
electronically. I had inquiries from Romania, Argentina,
and South Africa. We are truly *international*, folks. I
don’t want to lose them; they have brought fresh ideas and
energy into the Folio, and I’d like to see more.

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 478 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
YEA for Pierre and Karen Heim,
We here agree. no extra charges, and there’s gotta be ways to keep the
folio happening.
So when are the rest of you gonna convince Alix Jordan she can’t run a con,
and make her get on with her life.
She sure ain’t getting the hint from me.
On or off list.
everyone has the fair right to bid if they choose, but this is a train
wreck waiting to happen.

CC mom and Step Dad’s job is to protect the con as an ongoing thing, from
year to year. You individual folks deal with the specific years and have
all done great, but it’s up to us to be vigilant to make sure that another
australia doesn’t happen. It sure seems like a black hole in the flow of
the years of CC doesn’t it?
and to have it happen on the 20th just makes it worse.

Which is why we are so keen on supporting the Mai’s for 25, proven track
record, and obvious willingness to bust their butts working.

Ricky

and yes, it started as a joke, but my step dad title seems to work, CC
lives in my house, I have to help Karen be responsible for it, and I have
to help pay the bills for it, and there are plenty, with no income to
offset it, as we don’t charge anyone for the usage.

 

Group: runacc Message: 479 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF
Ok, so no fee for folio’ing.

What about the CD or/and print copy issue?

Yes, or no?

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 480 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: clarification
Just to be clear.

We Like Australia,
We like Christopher Ballis

A a trademark holder, ( goes for patents and copyrights as well)
you are charged with the constant defense of your holding.
We go through this monthly it seems with all of Karen’s Star Trek
Copyrights from her father.
If the look shape whatever of your holding is allowed to be infringed upon,
OR ( the important part) Changed so it could be argued it’s now different,
then legally, you could possibly either loose it, or have someone else make
a new claim on it, as they would argue its no longer the same thing.

So it is up to the holder to keep things the same.or at least recognizable.
The 3 major masq’s were not spelled out as demands in the ConStitution,
because it was assumed they were a ‘given’ and we all know what happens
when you assume:-)

But thats easily fixed, while still allowing con coms to be flexable enough
to be creative.

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 481 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

I would rather see it in print, but I’m very Old School.

Somehow, CC’s back in the Dark Ages (CC1-CC10)managed to print and
distribute a Folio *and* a Whole Costumer’s Catalogue back when photocopies
were MUCH more expensive than they are now, so we need a discussion as to
why the cost of producing and mailing a Folio is so insurmountable now. Is
it because of paying a copy shop to do the work vs. having a committee
member standing over the copying machine themselves? Is it because first
class postage is now ‘way more expensive? Is it because the con’s overall
membership is lower so there are less available funds? Is is because the
cost has not been amortized into the convention memberships?

Also, the fancy comb binding to get the pages to lay flat when the Folio is
opened is *very* nice (especially if you’re making up one of the designs
and need the booklet to lay open), but that’s an added expense for punching
and binding. One of those heavy-duty staplers and a box of extra-long
staples might be a more cost-effective solution.

The only way I will deal with a CD is if I have the ability to print images
from it.

I also HATEHATEHATE .pdf files. My computer takes *forever* to load them,
especially if they are large with lots of graphics, and sometimes, my
printer has refused to print them. I have never had these problems with any
other file type.

Also, remember that while 60+ pecent of American households have computers,
those computers may not necessarily be the latest and greatest in terms of
either hardware or software. (For example, I am on a 4-year-old Pentium III
650. There are people selling on eBay that are still using Pentium 166 and
266 machines that are 8+ years old. So while a household may have a
computer, that computer may not necessarily have a CD drive.)

Just my two cents.

–Karen

At 03:07 PM 3/16/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>Ok, so no fee for folio’ing.
>
>What about the CD or/and print copy issue?
>
>Yes, or no?
>
>Henry W. Osier,
>Co-Chair, CC21
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 482 From: martingear Date: 3/16/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>I would rather see it in print, but I’m very Old School.
>
>Somehow, CC’s back in the Dark Ages (CC1-CC10)managed to print and
>distribute a Folio *and* a Whole Costumer’s Catalogue back when photocopies
>were MUCH more expensive than they are now, so we need a discussion as to
>why the cost of producing and mailing a Folio is so insurmountable now. Is
>it because of paying a copy shop to do the work vs. having a committee
>member standing over the copying machine themselves? Is it because first
>class postage is now ‘way more expensive? Is it because the con’s overall
>membership is lower so there are less available funds? Is is because the
>cost has not been amortized into the convention memberships?
>

Come to think of it, I seem to remember standing at the copier for
several hours to “print” CC-3’s FF’s when we exceeded our original print
order.. (Yes, I owned the copier.)

>Also, the fancy comb binding to get the pages to lay flat when the Folio is
>opened is *very* nice (especially if you’re making up one of the designs
>and need the booklet to lay open), but that’s an added expense for punching
>and binding. One of those heavy-duty staplers and a box of extra-long
>staples might be a more cost-effective solution.
>

I’m not sure when the fancy bindings first started, but I agree that
they really aren’t necessary. Neither is color.

><snip>
>
>I also HATEHATEHATE .pdf files. My computer takes *forever* to load them,
>especially if they are large with lots of graphics, and sometimes, my
>printer has refused to print them. I have never had these problems with any
>other file type.
>

I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 483 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
copy, but someone else wants disc. Perhaps that might be worth considering.
I have no idea how much that would add to the work load, but I was just
wondering.

Elaine

> >
>I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
>but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
>printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
>couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
>couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
>sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
>producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar � FREE!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 484 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

Elaine, it may not double the workload, but it would definitely increase it
to try to produce a Folio in two different media.

Because CC-6 was a decent size con (400 pre-reg and another 200 at the
door), I think we got a bulk mail permit and did all of our mailings that
way, including the Folio. Meant there had to be a little more lead time on
PRs, etc., as bulk mail can take longer than First Class to get delivered,
but the $ savings was significant. I think the Folio would also qualify for
Media Mail if committees haven’t been mailing it that way. If what I’m
saying is stuff y’all are already doing, then we’ll have to look at other
alternatives. I’m just putting suggestions out there as I think of them.

Another way to save on pubs is if any of your committee members has access
to free copying (you typically have to supply your own paper) through
school or work. You spend some evenings/weekends having a couple of
committee people print the stuff themselves, and then have a
collating/stapling/addressing party at somebody’s house. (Kinda like the
Good Old Days of STAR TREK fanzines, LOL!)

To save time in producing the Folio for CC-9, RIcky and I pre-typed the
descriptions of anything we thought were “promising” designs into our
desktop publishing program. (We were NOT judges, and had no influence on
the judges’ decisions.) Then when it came time to produce the Folio, some
of the most tedious work was already done. Would work with scanning in
designs also–we didn’t at that time, as we didn’t have a scanner and had
to paste photocopies of the designs onto the master pages with the printed
descriptions. That would be different now with a scanner and a much
higher-rez laser printer.

–Karen

At 11:43 AM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
>copy, but someone else wants disc. Perhaps that might be worth considering.
> I have no idea how much that would add to the work load, but I was just
>wondering.
>
>Elaine
>
>
> > >
> >I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
> >but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
> >printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
> >couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
> >couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
> >sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
> >producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar ­ FREE!
>http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 485 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

In a message dated 3/17/2004 10:53:33 AM Central Standard Time,
ecmami@hotmail.com writes:

> How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
> copy, but someone else wants disc.

Elaine,
That’s my thought exactly!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 486 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

At 08:45 PM 3/16/2004, you wrote:

>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
>
> >
>I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
>but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
>printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
>couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
>couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
>sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
>producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.
>
>Marty

I don’t have a really strong objection to the CDs. The points I brought up
can all be solved, but I’ve heard the objections over and over ad
infinitum. (really want to see things explode on this type of issue, post a
suggestion on SMOFs that program books be issued on CDs. You won’t survive
the nuclear shock wave 🙂 )

I’m certainly not married to the comb bindings (spiral bindings are as
good). I don’t know if I can find the breakdown of CC21’s, but I don’t
recall the bindings being the major part of the printing costs.

I agree, color is certainly not necessary and would never consider it for a
print version. (unless Warren Buffet decided to pay for it. ) It would be a
nice perk for a CD.

I would, however, push for jewel cases for the CDs. I think it would
present a more professional product and I think that is important for
publicity and our public image.

Pierre

>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 487 From: martingear Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

Pierre & Sandy Pettinger wrote:
<snip>
I would, however, push for jewel cases for the CDs. I think it would

>present a more professional product and I think that is important for
>publicity and our public image.
>
>Pierre
>

OK, add $0.20 for the slim line style CD cases. BTW CD’s can be mailed
first class for a maximum of $0.60 postage.

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 488 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: clarification

Just so you know I’m paying attention to the discussion, should this be
codified? We need to review the ConStitution after CC22 anyway, so this
is something we should think about.

I’m presently working on the photos for CC10 (Finally!!!), and I just
got the remaining three tapes from CC21 from Carl, so I’ll be working on
CC21, CC22 and then CC12. As soon as I have the photos from Ken and
Vicki, I’ll be working on CC14. At that point, the only con left is
CC20. Based on the lack of response from them, I’ll be snapping stills
from Carl’s video for that. And when I’m done, all the CCs will have
photos for the masquerades, and I can concentrate my time on filling in
other holes in the site, like the guide we’re supposed to be writing. 😎

See you folks in just a few short weeks!

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> So it is up to the holder to keep things the same.or at least recognizable.
> The 3 major masq’s were not spelled out as demands in the ConStitution,
> because it was assumed they were a ‘given’ and we all know what happens
> when you assume:-)
>
> But thats easily fixed, while still allowing con coms to be flexable enough
> to be creative.
>
> Ricky



Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 489 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/17/2004
Subject: Re: clarification

You’re ready our minds, you should already have the changes to tighten
things up.

Ricky

At 10:43 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>Just so you know I’m paying attention to the discussion, should this be
>codified? We need to review the ConStitution after CC22 anyway, so this
>is something we should think about.

 

Group: runacc Message: 490 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

That’s what we had wanted to offer folks – the option. I know that I am
drowning in a sea of paper, so an opportunity to save some space, but still
have the Folio, seemed like a good thing.

Trudy

>From: henryosier@cs.com
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: [ICG-D] FFF
>Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:09:41 EST
>
>In a message dated 3/17/2004 10:53:33 AM Central Standard Time,
>ecmami@hotmail.com writes:
> > How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
> > copy, but someone else wants disc.
>Elaine,
> That’s my thought exactly!
> Henry
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get it now!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 491 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
While I have my own reservations about the London bid, I do not think that
the Australian CC was the disaster you imply. I enjoyed it a great deal.
It definitely wasn’t the worst CC I’ve been to.

It was certainly not the ACG’s fault that a few months prior to their con,
Americans would start to refuse air travel. Other than the chance to
socialize with the people you usually get to see at a CC, CC20 included all
the major activities expected. True, there was no Fashion Show, but there
was a Folio, as well as both SF&F and Historical Masquerades.

I am aware that some people were dismayed by the fact that CC20 was held on
a campus with dorm accommodations. I admit, this is not my favourite way to
sleep either, but there were also great advantages. A CC needs to be
flexible enough to accommodate its local potential membership (example,
CC18’s bellydancing track.) In the case of Australia the local membership
included a large number of recreationists. The open spaces of the campus
location allowed for the incredible historical tent camp, a Napoleonic
battle complete with gunfire as a programming item and (in my opinion at
least) a really fun Friday Night Social.

Other than the bitterness against the ICG that was fostered in Australia,
why do you consider CC20 to have been a failure?

Eileen Capes

—–Original Message—–

… it’s up to us to be vigilant to make sure that another
australia doesn’t happen. It sure seems like a black hole in the flow of
the years of CC doesn’t it?
and to have it happen on the 20th just makes it worse.

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 492 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: clarification

Hey, I’m good, but not perfect! Mindreading is still something I’m
working on. Just ask Erin or Dan.

Will work something up after the con, to submit for approval.

Cheers,

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> You’re ready our minds, you should already have the changes to tighten
> things up.
>
> Ricky
>
> At 10:43 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> >Just so you know I’m paying attention to the discussion, should this be
> >codified? We need to review the ConStitution after CC22 anyway, so this
> >is something we should think about.



Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 493 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: clarification

Ah.

Please disregard previous message. Instructions received and understood!

Cheers,

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> You’re ready our minds, you should already have the changes to tighten
> things up.
>
> Ricky
>
> At 10:43 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> >Just so you know I’m paying attention to the discussion, should this be
> >codified? We need to review the ConStitution after CC22 anyway, so this
> >is something we should think about.



Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 494 From: Elaine Mami Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

It is my understanding that bulk mail requires a minimum of 200 pieces. I’m
sure it will qualify for media mail rates if it is heavy enough and in an
envelope. We use that here in the office to send BIG brochures, and it
comes to $1.42 per piece. It also goes faster than bulk mail. Usually as
fast (or as slow) as regular mail.

Elaine

>
>Because CC-6 was a decent size con (400 pre-reg and another 200 at the
>door), I think we got a bulk mail permit and did all of our mailings that
>way, including the Folio. Meant there had to be a little more lead time on
>PRs, etc., as bulk mail can take longer than First Class to get delivered,
>but the $ savings was significant. I think the Folio would also qualify for
>Media Mail if committees haven’t been mailing it that way. If what I’m
>saying is stuff y’all are already doing, then we’ll have to look at other
>alternatives. I’m just putting suggestions out there as I think of them.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find a broadband plan that fits. Great local deals on high-speed Internet
access. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 495 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

To begin, the con asked me to run the historical masquerade and I agreed to
do so. The concom promised me a local costumer to handle arrangements for
me. It never made good on its promise.

By the fall of 2001, I intended to fly in, attend only the con because I was
committed to work on it, and fly out immediately afterwards. After the
November 2001 airliner crash in Queens, New York, on take-off from Kennedy,
however, I stopped flying. I immediately told Chris Ballis that I was not
coming. As full members, however, Tina and I have never received any of the
material provided to attendees — program book, folio, and so forth. The
con still owes those documents to us.

The con failed to arrange for ballots for CC23. The record shows that only
six ballots were cast at CC 20 for CC 23.. No site selection fees were
collected — money that is rightfully the property of the winning con, not
the con administering the ballot. Consequently, Tina and I were deprived of
a discount on our CC 23 memberships.

Why did CC 20 lead to animosity against the ICG? The ICG had nothing to do
with the con, except that, as ICG President, I heavily promoted CC 20 here
in North America. I feel like I was bitten on the hand that I was using to
feed the con!

Resentfully,

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:25 AM
Subject: [runacc] RE: CC20

> While I have my own reservations about the London bid, I do not think that
> the Australian CC was the disaster you imply. I enjoyed it a great deal.
> It definitely wasn’t the worst CC I’ve been to.
>
> It was certainly not the ACG’s fault that a few months prior to their con,
> Americans would start to refuse air travel. Other than the chance to
> socialize with the people you usually get to see at a CC, CC20 included
all
> the major activities expected. True, there was no Fashion Show, but there
> was a Folio, as well as both SF&F and Historical Masquerades.
>
> I am aware that some people were dismayed by the fact that CC20 was held
on
> a campus with dorm accommodations. I admit, this is not my favourite way
to
> sleep either, but there were also great advantages. A CC needs to be
> flexible enough to accommodate its local potential membership (example,
> CC18’s bellydancing track.) In the case of Australia the local membership
> included a large number of recreationists. The open spaces of the campus
> location allowed for the incredible historical tent camp, a Napoleonic
> battle complete with gunfire as a programming item and (in my opinion at
> least) a really fun Friday Night Social.
>
> Other than the bitterness against the ICG that was fostered in Australia,
> why do you consider CC20 to have been a failure?
>
> Eileen Capes
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
>
> … it’s up to us to be vigilant to make sure that another
> australia doesn’t happen. It sure seems like a black hole in the flow of
> the years of CC doesn’t it?
> and to have it happen on the 20th just makes it worse.
>
> Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 496 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

At 10:43 AM 3/17/2004, you wrote:

>How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
>copy, but someone else wants disc. Perhaps that might be worth considering.
> I have no idea how much that would add to the work load, but I was just
>wondering.
>
>Elaine

Its not insurmountable. The major issue involved, as I see it, is the
economies of scale. Generally, the larger your print order, the less you’re
paying per copy. If you’re talking about 96% CD and 5% print, that’s
probably not a big financial issue. If you’re talking 50/50 you may be
paying nearly as much for the 50% as you would for 100% split.

No I haven’t done a study to verify those numbers. They’re off the top of
my head. I do recall we slightly upped the order of CC21 Folios because we
would cross a threshold and pay less total.

Pierre

> > >
> >I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
> >but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
> >printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
> >couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
> >couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
> >sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
> >producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 497 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/18/2004
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] FFF

At 11:48 AM 3/17/2004, you wrote:

>Elaine, it may not double the workload, but it would definitely increase it
>to try to produce a Folio in two different media.
>
>Because CC-6 was a decent size con (400 pre-reg and another 200 at the
>door), I think we got a bulk mail permit and did all of our mailings that
>way, including the Folio. Meant there had to be a little more lead time on
>PRs, etc., as bulk mail can take longer than First Class to get delivered,
>but the $ savings was significant. I think the Folio would also qualify for
>Media Mail if committees haven’t been mailing it that way. If what I’m
>saying is stuff y’all are already doing, then we’ll have to look at other
>alternatives. I’m just putting suggestions out there as I think of them.
>
>Another way to save on pubs is if any of your committee members has access
>to free copying (you typically have to supply your own paper) through
>school or work. You spend some evenings/weekends having a couple of
>committee people print the stuff themselves, and then have a
>collating/stapling/addressing party at somebody’s house. (Kinda like the
>Good Old Days of STAR TREK fanzines, LOL!)

If you can get “free” copying this would change the financial dynamic
significantly.

>To save time in producing the Folio for CC-9, RIcky and I pre-typed the
>descriptions of anything we thought were “promising” designs into our
>desktop publishing program. (We were NOT judges, and had no influence on
>the judges’ decisions.) Then when it came time to produce the Folio, some
>of the most tedious work was already done. Would work with scanning in
>designs also–we didn’t at that time, as we didn’t have a scanner and had
>to paste photocopies of the designs onto the master pages with the printed
>descriptions. That would be different now with a scanner and a much
>higher-rez laser printer.

Actually, for CC21 every design submitted was scanned and the text entered
as they were received. After judging it then was a very simple matter to
plug everything into place in our publishing program.

Pierre and Sandy

>–Karen
>
>At 11:43 AM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >How difficult would it be to offer an “either/or” option? I prefer hard
> >copy, but someone else wants disc. Perhaps that might be worth considering.
> > I have no idea how much that would add to the work load, but I was just
> >wondering.
> >
> >Elaine
> >
> >
> > > >
> > >I don’t have problems with my slowest computer (P III 400) loading them,
> > >but now that you mention it, getting them to print is why I bought a
> > >printer with 256MB of memory. Prior to that I sometimes had to print a
> > >couple of pages at a time, still it could be done. You have raised a
> > >couple of excellent points that I hadn’t considered (so I geeked…
> > >sorry) but if the alternative is either charging the designers or not
> > >producing a FFF then CDs should be considered as a possible solution.

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 498 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20
Byron,

I can understand your frustration, because like you, the ICG to me is a
group of people I know. However to anyone who has never traveled to outside
cons, the ICG is a faceless organization.

Many Calgary members also were very bitter against the faceless ICG after
CC19. Calgary was encouraged by a certain large west coast chapter to bid
for a CC, and then due to events in the intervening years, the members of
that chapter stayed away en masse. Despite the fact that many east coast
members came to CC19, many locals who worked on the con felt let down by
“the ICG”. (Ironically, the members who did not work on the con are more
friendly to the ICG because of meeting the people who came.) A year after
CC19, a vote held by our chapter on following the ACG out of the ICG was a
tie.

I think in Australia the problem was even more intense. They had worked for
several years to throw a party, and the number of North Americans who came
could be counted without taking off your shoes.

By the way, I did not know that CC23 never received the site selection fees.
I deducted the voting fee when I sent in my membership and was never told
otherwise.

I will be out of town for the next five days, so if anyone replies to this,
I am not ignoring you.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–

Why did CC 20 lead to animosity against the ICG? The ICG had nothing to do
with the con, except that, as ICG President, I heavily promoted CC 20 here
in North America. I feel like I was bitten on the hand that I was using to
feed the con!

Resentfully,

Byron

 

Group: runacc Message: 499 From: Charles Galway Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

Eileen,
We do not have a problem with the discount for voting. It’s only six, and maybe less than that. We also thank the one or two CCs that gave some money, since by bidding against us, it upped their total income from voting fees.

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Cliff and Eileen

Byron,
<snip
By the way, I did not know that CC23 never received the site selection fees.
I deducted the voting fee when I sent in my membership and was never told
otherwise.

I will be out of town for the next five days, so if anyone replies to this,
I am not ignoring you.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 500 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/19/2004
Subject: Re: CC20

Point of honor here, CostumeCon is not the ICG and vice-versa; although they
do have a very loose affiliation. The ICG supports CostumeCon as much as it
is able considering it has no power what-so-ever (that’s how the general
membership seems to like it); obviously they can’t make anyone attend any
particular con.
If a certain chapter let you down, why hold it against the rest of the
organization? If the parent organization has actively (or neglectfully) done
something to harm your chapter, that’s something else. Our own chapter stuck
with the ICG for several years while our funds and records were being
consistently lost (maybe we’re just stubborn); we felt that it was worth the
effort and frustration for a group we believed in.
And it’s not like any of us enjoy having a tanking economy – I’d have loved
to go to Calgary and/or Australia, my finances do not allow that kind of
travel. Sometimes people just can’t come no matter how much they want to.
Would that make you think twice before bidding on a CC again? Absolutely.
Give up on costuming and all of your costuming clubs? I don’t think so.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
> Byron,
> Many Calgary members also were very bitter against the faceless ICG after
> CC19. Calgary was encouraged by a certain large west coast chapter to bid
> for a CC, and then due to events in the intervening years, the members of
> that chapter stayed away en masse. Despite the fact that many east coast
> members came to CC19, many locals who worked on the con felt let down by
> “the ICG”. (Ironically, the members who did not work on the con are more
> friendly to the ICG because of meeting the people who came.) A year after
> CC19, a vote held by our chapter on following the ACG out of the ICG was a
> tie.
> I think in Australia the problem was even more intense. They had worked
for
> several years to throw a party, and the number of North Americans who came
> could be counted without taking off your shoes.

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 9 of 67



Digest


Messages in runacc group. Page 9 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 401 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 402 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/13/2004
Subject: Re: Baptistown
Group: runacc Message: 403 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/28/2004
Subject: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 404 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 405 From: Charles Galway Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 406 From: Tina Connell Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 407 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 408 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 409 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 410 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 411 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 412 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 413 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 414 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 415 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 416 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 417 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Archive stuff
Group: runacc Message: 418 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff
Group: runacc Message: 419 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff
Group: runacc Message: 420 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 2/4/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff
Group: runacc Message: 421 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 2/9/2004
Subject: Hotel note for Trudy…
Group: runacc Message: 422 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/9/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff
Group: runacc Message: 423 From: axejudge Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: promoting via internet
Group: runacc Message: 424 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: Re: promoting via internet
Group: runacc Message: 425 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: Marketing in general (was Re: promoting via internet)
Group: runacc Message: 426 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/11/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing in general (was Re: promoting via internet)
Group: runacc Message: 427 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/11/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 428 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: internet marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 429 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 430 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 431 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 432 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 433 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Thought you might like to know…
Group: runacc Message: 434 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 2/19/2004
Subject: Re: Thought you might like to know…
Group: runacc Message: 435 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/19/2004
Subject: Re: Thought you might like to know…
Group: runacc Message: 436 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/20/2004
Subject: Compliance?
Group: runacc Message: 437 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/20/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?
Group: runacc Message: 438 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/21/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?
Group: runacc Message: 439 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 2/21/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?
Group: runacc Message: 440 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/22/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?
Group: runacc Message: 441 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 2/22/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 442 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/23/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request
Group: runacc Message: 443 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 444 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 445 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 446 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 447 From: Karen Heim Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 448 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 449 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?
Group: runacc Message: 450 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?


Group: runacc Message: 401 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

We deferred in honor of the long-standing ambition and perseverance of the
Baptistown Committee. We felt they had earned a chance to prove themselves
since they had bid so often with no reward (always a bridesmaid, never a
bride).
They, in turn, deferred the bid back to St. Louis for reasons which will
remain circumspectly private.
Will it happen again? Only if an equally deserving, unfulfilled committee
surfaces that the CC25 Committee really believes should get what's coming to
them.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: <s_trembley@yahoo.com>
> These mysterious folk sponsored a last minute bid for CC16 through
> their only known agent to the outside world, Toni Lay. The very
> mention of Baptistown had an odd effect on the established St. Louis
> bid and there was a deferral to Baptistown. Perhaps the CC25 group
> could elucidate on that historic decision – blackmail, bribery,
> favors of some sort … who could say if the secret is ready to be
> exposed?
> Don't worry, Henry, there's been an American Girl Store opened in
> Manhatten this past year so you will not have to go without 18 inch
> collectible dolls and their fashions if you decide to move east and
> decide to undermine someone else's CC bid. Could it happen to St.
> Louis twice???

Group: runacc Message: 402 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/13/2004
Subject: Re: Baptistown

However, they don't exist. Baptistown does! I've seen photos.

BTW, the Baptistown bid failed ONLY because Madame Beaujolais (and I do mean
that kind of madam) and the rest of the committee w/e/r/e j/a/i/l/e/d became
unavailable. (Or at least, so Toni claims.)

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: <henryosier@cs.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:44 PM
Subject: [runacc] Re: Baptistown

> Thank you, Sharon!
>
> I still would like to start a new joke bid. More along the lines of
Arkham,
> Gotham, Metropolis (either one), etc.
>
> Henry

Group: runacc Message: 403 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/28/2004
Subject: “Opt-in” mailing list

With CC22 coming up, it occurred to us that perhaps it's time to re-visit
the discussion of building the Costume Con mailing list. Looking at the
Ballot for CC25 site selection, we noticed that there isn't a "opt-in" to be
notified about future CCs.

We are considering putting the following as a required field on our
membership form:

"Circle 1 (one) option below;
YES I would like to receive mailings from future CostumeCons
NO I don't want to receive mailings about future CostumeCons"

I believe it was also suggested that anyone who votes on future site
selections would automatically be put on a mailing list (names were not
passed on to following cons, previously). We support the idea of
maintaining a central membership database. Therefore, if we want to
continue to build our base, we need to have some continuity from year to
year. Can we start this discussion up again and get people's opinions?

Bruce

Group: runacc Message: 404 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

We did take the ballots and send CC22 flyers to everyone who voted at
Calgary. However, we ran into a problem with the fact that not everyone
filled in an address on the ballots. I didn't know if we could make that a
required field or not. We used the ballot template from the
Costume-Conections web-site for the CC25 ballots, but I know that Calgary
used a slightly different form. Should there be a standard form that each
CC comittee is required to use?

Trudy

>From: "Bruce & Nora Mai" <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [runacc] "Opt-in" mailing list
>Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:29:31 -0600
>
>With CC22 coming up, it occurred to us that perhaps it's time to re-visit
>the discussion of building the Costume Con mailing list. Looking at the
>Ballot for CC25 site selection, we noticed that there isn't a "opt-in" to
>be
>notified about future CCs.
>
>We are considering putting the following as a required field on our
>membership form:
>
>"Circle 1 (one) option below;
>YES I would like to receive mailings from future CostumeCons
>NO I don't want to receive mailings about future CostumeCons"
>
>I believe it was also suggested that anyone who votes on future site
>selections would automatically be put on a mailing list (names were not
>passed on to following cons, previously). We support the idea of
>maintaining a central membership database. Therefore, if we want to
>continue to build our base, we need to have some continuity from year to
>year. Can we start this discussion up again and get people's opinions?
>
>
>Bruce
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
There are now three new levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Learn more.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1

Group: runacc Message: 405 From: Charles Galway Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

I would like to see a demographic, of attendance, state by state, of each costume con. A mailing list could be nice to have as well, if the membership were willing to have that data collected. A state by state demographic at least give an idea of how far folks are willing to trave. (of course air-fare is not always based on distance.)

Charles

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:29 PM
Subject: [runacc] "Opt-in" mailing list

<snip>
We are considering putting the following as a required field on our
membership form:
<snip>
Bruce

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 406 From: Tina Connell Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

I think that the most important factor for members/voters being willing to allow their addresses to be passed on would be the assurance that only CC committees would receive them. Not sponsors (if any), con photographers/ videographers, etc. At least one costumer has been stalked and is understandably wary of having her address or other personal information available.

Speaking of demographics, it's not something CC could reasonably ask for on the registration form, but an at-con survey (without names or other identifying information – perhaps at registration) of information such as age and personal interests, costuming or otherwise, could also be of interest and be helpful for future programming. Something along the lines of "I am presently interested in: quilting, fabric embellishment, dyeing, beadwork, embroidery, design, leatherwork, chainmail, fill in the blanks. I would like to see/go to programming on: ditto, ditto, fill in the blanks." An anonymous drop-box would take care of the identification factor.

As someone who works with pass-down lists from previous events (our hospital's annual 5K road race) future CCs would need to be aware that as much as 25% of a year-old address list can be obsolete. Used to be, the Post Awful would forward mail for as much as a year — not anymore. The notation on the mailing envelope of Address Correction Requested (I think that wording may have been slightly changed) will bring out-of-date addressed envelopes back to you (for a small fee) with the new address. Depends on whether updated addresses are wanted badly enough by a committee to add "returned-mail fees" as a budget line.

Tina

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 407 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

The fee for returned mail from an Address Correction Requested mailing
is $0.70 if they have to send you a separate mailing piece for the
notification. Returned items with address corrections are free but must
be resent (preferably in a clean envelope) at the current rate of
postage.

This I know because that's what I'm dealing with for The ICG Newsletter.
Every issue is mailed this way, since we can't rely on the chapters to
keep their membership addresses current with us.

Note that after the initial mailing I sent, I got a bunch of newsletters
back. Since then, I can expect one or two returns each issue. I've only
received three postage due notices (tht's how they arrive) since I
started producing the newsletter over a year ago.

With this issue I'm taking the time to find the plus-four zips, which
has the added benefit of confirming that the addresses we have are
actually correct. I've already found five that aren't being found in the
Post Office search. The Post Office provides an online search engine for
finding the plus-fours, which can be tedious but is still beneficial.

-betsy

Tina Connell wrote:

>
> As someone who works with pass-down lists from previous events (our hospital's annual 5K road race) future CCs would need to be aware that as much as 25% of a year-old address list can be obsolete. Used to be, the Post Awful would forward mail for as much as a year — not anymore. The notation on the mailing envelope of Address Correction Requested (I think that wording may have been slightly changed) will bring out-of-date addressed envelopes back to you (for a small fee) with the new address. Depends on whether updated addresses are wanted badly enough by a committee to add "returned-mail fees" as a budget line.
>
> Tina


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 408 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

Two things on this subject:

1. There is a standard ballot now – I think we have made adjustments
over time to accommodate known flaws in the process, but these ballots
take time to work through the system.

2. Address collection is supposed to be required, but that requirement
is in the control of the Site Selection Commissioner. Last year, our
Site Selection Commissioner needed some instruction prior to the con,
and she didn't get it. Thus, when collection of ballots occurred, there
were problems with the recordkeeping. Fortunately, I was there at the
con and was around to help with the ballot count when it took place, so
we could fix some of the omissions. I'll be in Atlanta, and should be
able to help this year's Site Selection Commissioner as well.

3. Site Selection has to be a supervised process, otherwise, people will
randomly fill out whatever they think should be on the form. Because
funds are collected and passed on to the next CC, it's essential to make
sure that the responsible person(s) know what information has to be
collected, including the dollar amounts collected and the method of
payment. All of this should be provided for in the ballots.

(I don't have mine yet – they're mailed to the PO Box, and I don't visit
it more than once a week, and less often if the weather is bad. I'm not
inclined to move the car when the snow is more than three inches deep
around it, and Dan's not particularly good about shoveling….)

Trudy, if your Site Selection Commissioner needs the help, just let me
know. I'll be pinned down for at least some of the con with the baby and
with Erin, and having a place to park (like the voting area) would be a
nice thing to have.

Cheers,

Betsy

Trudy Leonard wrote:

>
> We did take the ballots and send CC22 flyers to everyone who voted at
> Calgary. However, we ran into a problem with the fact that not everyone
> filled in an address on the ballots. I didn't know if we could make that a
> required field or not. We used the ballot template from the
> Costume-Conections web-site for the CC25 ballots, but I know that Calgary
> used a slightly different form. Should there be a standard form that each
> CC comittee is required to use?
>
> Trudy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 409 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

Betsy –

Thank you for the offer. When you do get your ballot, would you look it
over and make sure I did everything correctly? Thanks,

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] "Opt-in" mailing list
>Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:33:45 -0500
>
>Two things on this subject:
>
>1. There is a standard ballot now – I think we have made adjustments
>over time to accommodate known flaws in the process, but these ballots
>take time to work through the system.
>
>2. Address collection is supposed to be required, but that requirement
>is in the control of the Site Selection Commissioner. Last year, our
>Site Selection Commissioner needed some instruction prior to the con,
>and she didn't get it. Thus, when collection of ballots occurred, there
>were problems with the recordkeeping. Fortunately, I was there at the
>con and was around to help with the ballot count when it took place, so
>we could fix some of the omissions. I'll be in Atlanta, and should be
>able to help this year's Site Selection Commissioner as well.
>
>3. Site Selection has to be a supervised process, otherwise, people will
>randomly fill out whatever they think should be on the form. Because
>funds are collected and passed on to the next CC, it's essential to make
>sure that the responsible person(s) know what information has to be
>collected, including the dollar amounts collected and the method of
>payment. All of this should be provided for in the ballots.
>
>(I don't have mine yet – they're mailed to the PO Box, and I don't visit
>it more than once a week, and less often if the weather is bad. I'm not
>inclined to move the car when the snow is more than three inches deep
>around it, and Dan's not particularly good about shoveling….)
>
>Trudy, if your Site Selection Commissioner needs the help, just let me
>know. I'll be pinned down for at least some of the con with the baby and
>with Erin, and having a place to park (like the voting area) would be a
>nice thing to have.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Betsy
>
>Trudy Leonard wrote:
> >
> > We did take the ballots and send CC22 flyers to everyone who voted at
> > Calgary. However, we ran into a problem with the fact that not everyone
> > filled in an address on the ballots. I didn't know if we could make
>that a
> > required field or not. We used the ballot template from the
> > Costume-Conections web-site for the CC25 ballots, but I know that
>Calgary
> > used a slightly different form. Should there be a standard form that
>each
> > CC comittee is required to use?
> >
> > Trudy
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed
experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1

Group: runacc Message: 410 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

On Jan 28, 2004, at 8:29 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> With CC22 coming up, it occurred to us that perhaps it's time to
> re-visit
> the discussion of building the Costume Con mailing list. Looking at
> the
> Ballot for CC25 site selection, we noticed that there isn't a "opt-in"
> to be
> notified about future CCs.

Having just returned from FurtherConfusion (the whole 7 mile drive),
I've got to say that they've got a decent solution as part of their
registration form.

—–
( ) FurtherConfusion may share my email address with other furry
conventions
( ) FurtherConfusion may share my postal address with other furry
conventions
—–

If we look at Costume-Con as a whole, I'm less worried about address
lists being passed forward to seated Costume-Con committees. There is a
clear business relationship with Costume-Con by which that can be
justified. That said, I'd suggest the following on all registration
forms and ballots:

——–
Privacy Statement
By registering/voting you agree that your contact information may be
used by Costume-Con to contact you about this and future events.

I prefer to be contacted via (please check at least one)
[ ] postal mail
[ ] email
[ ] I wish to be added to future Costume-Con email discussion lists

Your contact information will be kept confidential to Costume-Con and
seated Costume-Con conference committees unless you chose otherwise.
Any outside organization receiving information we collect must agree
not to further distribute your contact information without your
explicit permission.

Costume-Con may share my contact information with (check as many as you
wish)
[ ] Costume-Con Bid Committees
[ ] The International Costumers' Guild and its chapters
[ ] Other non-profit costume, needlework and costume-craft organizations

——–

Gives us a ton of flexibility while maintaining what ought to be a
reasonable level of trust.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
(Kevin's)
"It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

Group: runacc Message: 411 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Information Request

Hello!
Could all previous CostumeCon chairs mention how many upcoming CostumeCons
they passed money along to, as well as which CostumeCon they chaired? I know
that this topic has been brought up before, but this information is needed again.
Thanks in advance!

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 412 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

Looks pretty good to me.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: "Andrew T Trembley" <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] "Opt-in" mailing list

> On Jan 28, 2004, at 8:29 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > With CC22 coming up, it occurred to us that perhaps it's time to
> > re-visit
> > the discussion of building the Costume Con mailing list. Looking at
> > the
> > Ballot for CC25 site selection, we noticed that there isn't a "opt-in"
> > to be
> > notified about future CCs.
>
> Having just returned from FurtherConfusion (the whole 7 mile drive),
> I've got to say that they've got a decent solution as part of their
> registration form.
>
> —–
> ( ) FurtherConfusion may share my email address with other furry
> conventions
> ( ) FurtherConfusion may share my postal address with other furry
> conventions
> —–
>
> If we look at Costume-Con as a whole, I'm less worried about address
> lists being passed forward to seated Costume-Con committees. There is a
> clear business relationship with Costume-Con by which that can be
> justified. That said, I'd suggest the following on all registration
> forms and ballots:
>
> ——–
> Privacy Statement
> By registering/voting you agree that your contact information may be
> used by Costume-Con to contact you about this and future events.
>
> I prefer to be contacted via (please check at least one)
> [ ] postal mail
> [ ] email
> [ ] I wish to be added to future Costume-Con email discussion lists
>
> Your contact information will be kept confidential to Costume-Con and
> seated Costume-Con conference committees unless you chose otherwise.
> Any outside organization receiving information we collect must agree
> not to further distribute your contact information without your
> explicit permission.
>
> Costume-Con may share my contact information with (check as many as you
> wish)
> [ ] Costume-Con Bid Committees
> [ ] The International Costumers' Guild and its chapters
> [ ] Other non-profit costume, needlework and costume-craft organizations
>
> ——–
>
> Gives us a ton of flexibility while maintaining what ought to be a
> reasonable level of trust.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
> (Kevin's)
> "It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
> 2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
> hand
> Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Group: runacc Message: 413 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

Betsy (Marks) Delaney
Chair: Costume-Con Fifteen (CCXV)
We passed the funds to CC16-CC18 inclusive, though not in even amounts.

When we were done refunding membership fees to our staff members, we
cleaned out the remainder of our bank account by passing the funds
through to the next three CCs.

Note that we gave our staff members the option of donating their
membership fees to future cons – and that at least six of them declined
their refunds for this purpose.

Cheers,

Betsy

henryosier@cs.com wrote:

>
> Hello!
> Could all previous CostumeCon chairs mention how many upcoming CostumeCons
> they passed money along to, as well as which CostumeCon they chaired? I know
> that this topic has been brought up before, but this information is needed again.
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Henry W. Osier,
> Co-Chair, CC21
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 414 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

CC16; gave money to all actual following CC committees – 17, 18 & 19 (which
was voted on at CC16).

Nora Mai

—– Original Message —–
From: <henryosier@cs.com>
> Could all previous CostumeCon chairs mention how many upcoming CostumeCons
> they passed money along to, as well as which CostumeCon they chaired? I
know
> that this topic has been brought up before, but this information is needed
again.

Group: runacc Message: 415 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

We figured a statement to the effect of it being for the exclusive use of
CostumeCon(s) should be included. With the option for a future opt-out if
the individual so desired. If future CCs included the same options on their
forms, the list could be expanded and those who change their mind could have
their name removed from the list.
Possibly it could be created and stored in a e-spreadsheet format that could
be passed along with a master copy kept by Karen D (as trademark holder).
Thoughts?

Nora

Group: runacc Message: 416 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 1/29/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

I have to admit I like the flexibility it gives, although something was
bothering me about the wording of the Privacy Statement, but I can't put my
finger on it. Nonetheless, we do need to have the disclaimer about it not
being shared with anyone outside the CC organization(s).

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: "Andrew T Trembley" <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] "Opt-in" mailing list

> On Jan 28, 2004, at 8:29 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > With CC22 coming up, it occurred to us that perhaps it's time to
> > re-visit
> > the discussion of building the Costume Con mailing list. Looking at
> > the
> > Ballot for CC25 site selection, we noticed that there isn't a "opt-in"
> > to be
> > notified about future CCs.
>
> Having just returned from FurtherConfusion (the whole 7 mile drive),
> I've got to say that they've got a decent solution as part of their
> registration form.
>
> —–
> ( ) FurtherConfusion may share my email address with other furry
> conventions
> ( ) FurtherConfusion may share my postal address with other furry
> conventions
> —–
>
> If we look at Costume-Con as a whole, I'm less worried about address
> lists being passed forward to seated Costume-Con committees. There is a
> clear business relationship with Costume-Con by which that can be
> justified. That said, I'd suggest the following on all registration
> forms and ballots:
>
> ——–
> Privacy Statement
> By registering/voting you agree that your contact information may be
> used by Costume-Con to contact you about this and future events.
>
> I prefer to be contacted via (please check at least one)
> [ ] postal mail
> [ ] email
> [ ] I wish to be added to future Costume-Con email discussion lists
>
> Your contact information will be kept confidential to Costume-Con and
> seated Costume-Con conference committees unless you chose otherwise.
> Any outside organization receiving information we collect must agree
> not to further distribute your contact information without your
> explicit permission.
>
> Costume-Con may share my contact information with (check as many as you
> wish)
> [ ] Costume-Con Bid Committees
> [ ] The International Costumers' Guild and its chapters
> [ ] Other non-profit costume, needlework and costume-craft organizations
>
> ——–
>
> Gives us a ton of flexibility while maintaining what ought to be a
> reasonable level of trust.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
> (Kevin's)
> "It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
> 2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
> hand
> Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Group: runacc Message: 417 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Archive stuff

Hi, folks!

This is going to all the future CC concoms, so we can try to stop
getting permission on the fly or after the fact…

You all know I maintain the Costume-Con Archives (separate from the ICG
Archives). They contain a huge number of photos, many of which will
never be included on the site, because I don't have permission to
publish them. In fact, I have only the merest permission to publish most
of what I have, because people signed releases (in theory) before they
competed.

I don't have the permissions in my hands, and if I'm asked, I have to
remove the photos. One costumer has already asked me to do this.

Now, here's the thing:

I've been asking concoms to provide the Archives with a set of videos
and photos either at the con or just prior to. I already fund the web
site and domain out of my pocket and the goodness of my heart. I can't
afford to pay for the photos and videos too. And I turn over the
publications I receive as a member to the archives as well. Someday,
when someone else is doing this job, all the stuff I've collected will
be going to them for storage.

I'm telling you this because I would like to see us add the donation of
these things automatically to the archives as a requirement for running
a CC. And I would like to see requests for permission to publish
resulting photos and Fashion Folio designs on the site as a part of the
releases and in the rules published in PRs and program books, so that
people who participate in the competitions and at the cons know that
their images may be reproduced online.

Note several things:

1. Karen Dick is working to acquire retroactive permission to publish
designs as a part of the site, so that we can add the line drawings to
the Fashion Show sections for each con. I'd personally like to see the
whole Fashion Folio reproduced, but will settle for the designs that
were made into costumes.

2. We would need to make it clear to the costumers/designers that the
images go online in a reasonably unprintable format. I store the images
in nothing larger than 150dpi, at 400 pixels max width or height. To
print such images, people would need to increase the dpi to 300 minimum,
and at that size, the images would be tiny in print.

Before we get to Atlanta, I'd like to know if I'll be getting a complete
set of the photos and videos. I'd also appreciate it if releases include
some sort of publication statement. And I'd like the remaining CC's to
commit to the same, if possible.

Comments? Questions? Flames?

Thanks!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

Group: runacc Message: 418 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff

Betsy, and all,
I have a bunch of photos from CC21 that I and one of my staff, Mike
Vande Bunt, took and them uploaded to a website that anyone can post pictures
up to. The "albums" are private and cannot be gotten into by just anyone. I
started working on organizing and captioning them all last fall, but then got
busy with other stuff.
Betsy's e-mail has spurred me to complete this effort. Once done,
I'll figure out the linkage so anyone can see them. I think you can down load
them from that site, also.
I have no problem giving them to the archive. I'll e-mail Mike and
ask him if he would like his photos in the archive as well.
Of course, being photos that he and I took while working the con,
most of them are not serious, but very fun. As soon as I hear back from Mike,
I'll let you know what he says.

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 419 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/3/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff

On Feb 3, 2004, at 9:13 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Before we get to Atlanta, I'd like to know if I'll be getting a
> complete
> set of the photos and videos. I'd also appreciate it if releases
> include
> some sort of publication statement. And I'd like the remaining CC's to
> commit to the same, if possible.
>
> Comments? Questions? Flames?

Well…

I know Karen is loathe to constitutional/regulatory growth, but…

I think we need a section or subsection in the constitution listing a
committee's obligation to the CC archives.

(yeah, it's legalistic, but…)
——

1. It's the committee's responsibility to provide an organized and
complete visual record of all contest entries in competition to the
Costume-Con archivist within 3 months of the end of the conference.
This must include still photographs and design reproductions, and may
also include video taken by committee staff.

2. All contest entrants in competition must grant license to the
Costume-Con trademark holders to reproduce, display and publish images
of the entries in Costume-Con official documents. Copies of these
license releases must be turned over to the Costume-Con archivist as
part of the record of contest entries.

3. Individuals who do not wish to grant license for use of their image
to Costume-Con may enter competitions in exhibition class.
Exhibition-only entrants should be asked, but not required, to sign the
same grant of license as a competitor.

4. The sponsor of a special category or award may request a grant of
license from the competitors and/or winners in that category, but that
grant of license may not supersede or interfere with the license
granted to the Costume-Con trademark holders. Should a committee accept
sponsorship for a special category or award, it is the committee's
responsibility to negotiate and satisfy any license agreements. Such
agreements are not explicitly covered under the standard grant of
license.
——–

Now I know we have a few prolific designers and a costumer or two who
will balk at this.
I've heard the arguments. I think letting them hold the whole
reproduction/publishing question hostage isn't acceptable. Our history
is just that: *our* history. If they want to participate in a communal
activity such as competition at a convention they need to accept that
the community and the organization demand an accessible record of the
events.

But stepping back from that, there's the simple requirement of Point
#1. A committee needs somebody (possibly the committee secretary) to
act as a recorder for the weekend and ensure that records are
collected, prepared and submitted to the archivist.

I would love to not only see the competition records collected, but
also photographs of any costume exhibits and (if the waiver were
extended to all attendees) photos of socials, panels and other
interesting goings-on.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
(Kevin's)
"It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

Group: runacc Message: 420 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 2/4/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff

At 03:54 PM 2/3/2004, you wrote:

>On Feb 3, 2004, at 9:13 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:
> > Before we get to Atlanta, I'd like to know if I'll be getting a
> > complete
> > set of the photos and videos. I'd also appreciate it if releases
> > include
> > some sort of publication statement. And I'd like the remaining CC's to
> > commit to the same, if possible.
> >
> > Comments? Questions? Flames?
>
>Well…
>
>I know Karen is loathe to constitutional/regulatory growth, but…
>
>I think we need a section or subsection in the constitution listing a
>committee's obligation to the CC archives.
>
>(yeah, it's legalistic, but…)

I largely agree with Betsy & Andy. I have been approached by some
individuals asking that they not get official photos (or not allow them to
be sold) or have the video cameras turned off during their presentations.
My response to anyone who wants to compete in an event I run is: no photo
and video, no stage. I understand reasonable attempts to protect one's work
and image, but the events we run need to have their historical integrity
protected. One wonders what the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences
would say if a presenter or winner demanded that there be no photos or the
video cameras be turned off while they are on stage.

Pierre

>——
>
>1. It's the committee's responsibility to provide an organized and
>complete visual record of all contest entries in competition to the
>Costume-Con archivist within 3 months of the end of the conference.
>This must include still photographs and design reproductions, and may
>also include video taken by committee staff.
>
>2. All contest entrants in competition must grant license to the
>Costume-Con trademark holders to reproduce, display and publish images
>of the entries in Costume-Con official documents. Copies of these
>license releases must be turned over to the Costume-Con archivist as
>part of the record of contest entries.
>
>3. Individuals who do not wish to grant license for use of their image
>to Costume-Con may enter competitions in exhibition class.
>Exhibition-only entrants should be asked, but not required, to sign the
>same grant of license as a competitor.
>
>4. The sponsor of a special category or award may request a grant of
>license from the competitors and/or winners in that category, but that
>grant of license may not supersede or interfere with the license
>granted to the Costume-Con trademark holders. Should a committee accept
>sponsorship for a special category or award, it is the committee's
>responsibility to negotiate and satisfy any license agreements. Such
>agreements are not explicitly covered under the standard grant of
>license.
>——–
>
>Now I know we have a few prolific designers and a costumer or two who
>will balk at this.
>I've heard the arguments. I think letting them hold the whole
>reproduction/publishing question hostage isn't acceptable. Our history
>is just that: *our* history. If they want to participate in a communal
>activity such as competition at a convention they need to accept that
>the community and the organization demand an accessible record of the
>events.
>
>But stepping back from that, there's the simple requirement of Point
>#1. A committee needs somebody (possibly the committee secretary) to
>act as a recorder for the weekend and ensure that records are
>collected, prepared and submitted to the archivist.
>
>I would love to not only see the competition records collected, but
>also photographs of any costume exhibits and (if the waiver were
>extended to all attendees) photos of socials, panels and other
>interesting goings-on.
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/

"Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro'hm
"The Illusion of Historical Fact"
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

Group: runacc Message: 421 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 2/9/2004
Subject: Hotel note for Trudy…

So you probably saw Dana's note on ICG-D about the rate difference
before and during CC22.

Probably ought to check out the hotel website and call in and get room
rates without using the conference code for CC22 weekend. If they quote
you a lower rate, call your sales agent and get the conference rate dropped.

andy

Group: runacc Message: 422 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/9/2004
Subject: Re: Archive stuff

Sorry I haven't been more prompt about answering posts. Have been dealing
with Real Life stuff.

(1) I don't see what good it's going to do to mandate photos and video for
the Archives, when some CC's have not even fulfilled their obligation to
send me a copy of all of their PRs and other publications.

(2) As for photo and video releases, I think it's a good idea and pretty
much standard operating procedure for other conventions. If you're dressing
up and going to a public event, then people should have the ability to
photograph of video you.

(3) As for the "opt-in" mailing list, I think it's a good idea, but am
unsure what wording is the best to use. If we had such a mailing list, it
would be MUCH easier to track down members from earlier cons and get
permissions to use design sketches, etc. on the archival web site.

Back at you,

–Karen

Group: runacc Message: 423 From: axejudge Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: promoting via internet

Considering how steamed I just got making my last 2 posts on ICG-D, I
guess I'd better bring up the topic here.

"Using the Internet Effectively as a Promotion Tool"

Quite frankly, we don't. Information is not put up early enough, and
it isn't kept regularly updated. Excuse me for not sugarcoating it,
but that's just dumb.

We say we want fresh blood; new, excited people to build the ranks of
what is, to be frank, a stagnant group in terms of membership.
Creatively, we're fine; but as far as getting new people involved
we're mostly spinning our wheels.

Where are the new recruits? They're at the cons – the teenagers and
twentysomethings. Those people we can meet face to face. However,
there are many, many more out there, and maybe they haven't found a
group of like-minded people to hang with. Where do they find out
about people who share their interests? Noodling around on the
Internet, that's where. They don't see us. They aren't where our
flyers are.

Here in cyberspace, here is where we need to be making contact – and
time and again, we squander our opportunities.

We give them virtually no information. If a website isn't regularly
updated, they stop checking it. If the information that is there
isn't accurate, they stop believing it.

We don't crosspost on a wide enough variety of group lists of people
who might be interested.

And, in spite of the fact that we are all very supportive of one
another, there isn't enough out there to encourage and reassure a new
person that there is a place for them with us, that there's no need to
feel they wouldn't be welcome because their work doesn't compare to
what is (occasionally) advertised on the site. I've had people tell
me they weren't sure whether to come to a convention, because they
were scared people would laugh at them if they asked questions, or
mock their meager costuming skills.

I use the Internet a lot. I think any group or business that doesn't
is foolish. I think any group or business that uses it poorly is
stupid, because it is a bigger PR tool than they realize. If they
have a crappy website, to my mind that indicates they don't care – and
if they don't, why should I?

Look; I'm not a great PR person. I don't have that cheery,
enthusiastic vibe (search your feelings; you know this to be true). I
also don't have the range of fannish connections many of the rest of
you have. Sometimes, though, that is an advantage. I can see things
from the outside as well as the inside. I think, "If I were a new
person, and I just happened upon this group's site, would I be
interested? Would I feel intimidated? Would I laugh when I saw how
seriously they take themselves for a group that shows little to back
it up? Would I be disgusted, because they didn't seem to really be
interested in me, although that's what they claimed?"

*pant pant pant*

*climbs off soapbox*

Next?

Karen

Group: runacc Message: 424 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: Re: promoting via internet

Sorry I've been missing for so long. Computer problems.

Karen, you're right. What would you do to make these changes/corrections?

I am as nearly Internet Illiterate as anyone can be, so I have nothing to
offer here, myself. However, I come from the corporate world, where stating
the problem is not much help without a few suggested solutions. (Being at
work right now doesn't help!)

Having recently noticed a large lack of information on the LunaCon website,
I contacted the ConChair, who is very computer geekish, and he is working on
those things we (Carl, Dora & I) pointed out. Being a costumer, he was able
to understand what we were concerned about; being ConChair he is in a
position to fix it.

That's how I work. I go to someone who can understand what I mean, and who
is in a position to have it fixed. One ConCom at a time.

So, what do you suggest?

Elaine

>
>Considering how steamed I just got making my last 2 posts on ICG-D, I
>guess I'd better bring up the topic here.
>
>"Using the Internet Effectively as a Promotion Tool"
>
>Quite frankly, we don't. Information is not put up early enough, and
>it isn't kept regularly updated. Excuse me for not sugarcoating it,
>but that's just dumb.
>
>We say we want fresh blood; new, excited people to build the ranks of
>what is, to be frank, a stagnant group in terms of membership.
>Creatively, we're fine; but as far as getting new people involved
>we're mostly spinning our wheels.
>
>Where are the new recruits? They're at the cons – the teenagers and
>twentysomethings. Those people we can meet face to face. However,
>there are many, many more out there, and maybe they haven't found a
>group of like-minded people to hang with. Where do they find out
>about people who share their interests? Noodling around on the
>Internet, that's where. They don't see us. They aren't where our
>flyers are.
>
>Here in cyberspace, here is where we need to be making contact – and
>time and again, we squander our opportunities.
>
>We give them virtually no information. If a website isn't regularly
>updated, they stop checking it. If the information that is there
>isn't accurate, they stop believing it.
>
>We don't crosspost on a wide enough variety of group lists of people
>who might be interested.
>
>And, in spite of the fact that we are all very supportive of one
>another, there isn't enough out there to encourage and reassure a new
>person that there is a place for them with us, that there's no need to
>feel they wouldn't be welcome because their work doesn't compare to
>what is (occasionally) advertised on the site. I've had people tell
>me they weren't sure whether to come to a convention, because they
>were scared people would laugh at them if they asked questions, or
>mock their meager costuming skills.
>
>I use the Internet a lot. I think any group or business that doesn't
>is foolish. I think any group or business that uses it poorly is
>stupid, because it is a bigger PR tool than they realize. If they
>have a crappy website, to my mind that indicates they don't care – and
>if they don't, why should I?
>
>Look; I'm not a great PR person. I don't have that cheery,
>enthusiastic vibe (search your feelings; you know this to be true). I
>also don't have the range of fannish connections many of the rest of
>you have. Sometimes, though, that is an advantage. I can see things
>from the outside as well as the inside. I think, "If I were a new
>person, and I just happened upon this group's site, would I be
>interested? Would I feel intimidated? Would I laugh when I saw how
>seriously they take themselves for a group that shows little to back
>it up? Would I be disgusted, because they didn't seem to really be
>interested in me, although that's what they claimed?"
>

_________________________________________________________________
Choose now from 4 levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage – no more account
overload! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/

Group: runacc Message: 425 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/10/2004
Subject: Marketing in general (was Re: promoting via internet)

On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:51 PM, axejudge wrote:

> Where are the new recruits? They're at the cons – the teenagers and
> twentysomethings. Those people we can meet face to face.

That's assuming we're out at conventions promoting. We need to.

> However,
> there are many, many more out there, and maybe they haven't found a
> group of like-minded people to hang with. Where do they find out
> about people who share their interests? Noodling around on the
> Internet, that's where. They don't see us. They aren't where our
> flyers are.

This is true. Any event like this needs a marketing plan.

A lot comes down to branding.

A bid or con needs to be recognizable, both on the web and in person.
This starts with a theme or brand. CC26?'s theme is "Adventures in the
Costume Continuum" which is all good and fine for inclusiveness (a
battle we need to fight with the reputation California has for
historical bias), but while associated logo is popular the theme isn't
that inspiring…

…which is why we tapped the "Evil Genius" bid theme and tied it back
to the time-travel concept and base our in-person marketing on it. The
"Evil Genius" theme is very popular and inspiring; every bid party we
have people asking how they can join the League of Evil Geniuses.

Brand basics:
It's got to be recognizable and inspiring.

So once we've got a brand, how do we implement it? Well, we've got to
get that brand out there, and make sure that people connect it to the
event.

Read "The Imagineering Way" by the Disney Imagineers
http://tinyurl.com/2lh57
Nobody does end-to-end design like Disney does. Everything in a Disney
venue is designed; nothing is left to chance. There's a lot they can
teach you about creative attention to detail.

We have the parties, of course. Not a lot of people connect them in
their minds to the bid yet, but that's because we haven't done much
besides having CC26? fliers at them. We've mostly been establishing the
brand the last year and a half. The coordinated portraits, music and
decor really capture peoples attention.

We just added the CC26? name and URL to the disposable party posters
last month at FurCon. Since we expect people to swipe the posters off
the walls after the party (and are rarely disappointed), it's a good
bit of marketing.

Our next outing (this weekend at Gallifrey) we're adding 4 big CC26?
posters to the permanent gallery of portraits to create a tighter link
between the party and the con.

So that mostly covers things about parties. What else can we do to
promote our new brand in-person? Take advantage of what we do well.
We're talking a Costume-Con, so we should market through costumes where
we can.

A lesson from ConJose: a "uniform" for committee members attracts a lot
of attention.

When ConJose was bidding and promoting, they had an "alien tourists"
theme going ("do you know the way to ConJose?"). Committee members all
had matching bird-of-paradise print tropical shirts they wore when
bidding. A few dozen people being seen regularly at cons all over the
world (even just by themselves sometime) built their brand image.

We're starting on a "uniform kit" for committee members. The committee
members will be asked (if they want to participate) to purchase a lab
coat in their size. We'll provide an embroidered breast-pocket patch
with the "League of Evil Geniuses" bid logo and an iron-on transfer for
the back with the "Persistence of Stitchery" con logo. Again, something
to tie the two brand identities together.

Another thing is (as Atlanta did at CC21) to do brand-based Masquerade
entries at conventions the committee attends. I'm not sure how well
Atlanta's tied back to any brand identity they have (sorry, Trudy), but
it was something. We're not planning a bid entry for CC22 or for
Noreascon, but we probably will do one for CC23's F&SF masquerade
(since voting doesn't normally close until Sunday, right?). It will
definitely tie back to our brand identity. We're also looking at doing
theme-based masquerade entries at as many cons as we can for 2006-2008.

It doesn't hurt to offer to run a costume exhibit at local conventions
either, particularly if you can get costumes for the exhibit that
dovetail with your theme. Just make sure you've got an agreement that
you can have a nice "Brought to you by CC??" sign there.

It doesn't hurt to offer to work masquerades at local conventions,
particularly if you can politely let folks know that your group brought
a bunch of staff. It's a good place to wear the con uniform and be
seen.

And of course, one can't discount fan tables and dealers-room tables
(as much as I hate sitting at them). Make sure that the brand identity
is out in front there too.

So that pretty much covers at-con marketing (well, I left out fliers,
but I'll get back to them). There is also non-con in-person marketing
that can be done. It's just a matter of finding local costume-centric
organizations and contacts. Work the historical recreation groups, the
textile arts groups (and schools), the theater groups (and schools).
Offer to do co-op fundraisers with costume-centric non-profit arts
organizations (we do know how to organize events, don't we?). Offer to
sponsor or help with competitions with those same organizations (lots
of people like to compete) and particularly with art and theater
schools. I'm looking at organizing things with the Lace Guild Museum
and the San Jose Museum of Quilts and Textiles in the future. I'm also
trying to get my local bid/concom involved with the local Imperial
Court chapters (drag queens raising money for charity). Again, remember
to use this to promote brand-recognition.

Finally, print/mail/email/web communications. These are ultimately all
the same. We're really talking text marketing and ways of distributing
it, and again, it all comes back to brand identity.

Decide whether or not you want standard header/footer boilerplate on
all official communications (trust me, you do). Use these in print, in
email and on the web.

Put together some design standards that will work well both in print
and on the web (forget HTML mail; people hate it, just stick with the
standard text there). Keep the brand identity going. Ensure all
documentation follows these standards (not just bid and marketing
documentation, but also folio, program, awards and certificates). You
want prospective members to get a consistent message. Plan to make all
official documents available both in print and on the web (as web pages
and/or PDF format) and get releases to do so if necessary.

BTW, while I'm not sure what the Chicago "blocks" logo had to do with
the Mobsters theme, I did like that it was consistently applied across
official materials. It (and the associated color scheme) was clear and
recognizable.

Put together an organized web site. Buy and read Morville & Rosenfeld's
"Information Architecture for the World Wide Web"
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/infotecture2/
Nobody should be allowed to design and publish a website without
reading this. It's not a technical book. Morville & Rosenfeld are
librarians. It's a no-nonsense book about how to make your information
easy to reach.

Ensure your web pages are rich with text references to things people
might search for, and get other people and groups with web pages to
link to them. Both have a great deal of impact on search-engine
placement.

If you're low on geek resources, look into some of the available free
content-management systems, such as Drupal, Mambo, phpNuke and postNuke
(I hate Nuke), OpenCMS and others that will make updating the website
easy for your committee members. Sign up with a web-hosting company
that will support the tool of your choice.

Consider tailored marketing materials for different audiences.

Plan a distribution schedule. Here's our projected schedule (forgive
the formatting, please):
Now: Start distributing fliers in person everywhere
Throw bid parties everywhere
CC22: Ask Trudy (before) if we can include our "PR -2" in the member
packets for CC22
CC23: Ask Utah (before) if we can include "PR -1" in member packets for
CC23
Keep throwing parties, they're just not bid parties anymore
CC24: Mail out PR 1 just before CC24
Plan quarterly updates to website
Start emailing out quarterly updates to costume mailing lists
Start emailing (and mailing) out quarterly updates to contacts at
local orgs and schools
Start distributing Fashion Folio contest fliers at convention art
shows and masquerades
CC25: Mail out PR 2 just before CC25
Plan monthly updates to website
Start emailing out monthly updates to costume mailing lists
Start emailing (and mailing) out monthly updates to contacts at local
orgs and schools
Start distributing "show" competition fliers at convention masquerades
Schedule PR 3 to coincide with folio mailing
Schedule PR 4 (last) to coincide with ballot mailing deadline
CC26: Marketing is done, just remaining pubs that are distributed at
the con

Match up the distribution schedule with staff deadlines, and make
adjustments as necessary. If possible, move up staff deadlines rather
than sliding the distribution schedule.

Stick to the schedule. Make sure people understand how others will
suffer if their deadlines slide.

That's all I can think of now.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
(Kevin's)
"It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

Group: runacc Message: 426 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/11/2004
Subject: Re: Marketing in general (was Re: promoting via internet)

Oh, come on, Andy. Surely you can't have run out of ideas so quickly.

Elaine
Who is biting the tongue that is firmly in cheek

>That's all I can think of now.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find great local high-speed Internet access value at the MSN High-Speed
Marketplace. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

Group: runacc Message: 427 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/11/2004
Subject: Re: “Opt-in” mailing list

I like this wording.

–Karen

At 12:12 PM 1/29/2004 -0800, you wrote:

>>——–
>>Privacy Statement
>>By registering/voting you agree that your contact information may be
>>used by Costume-Con to contact you about this and future events.
>>
>>
>>I prefer to be contacted via (please check at least one)
>>[ ] postal mail
>>[ ] email
>>[ ] I wish to be added to future Costume-Con email discussion lists
>>
>>
>>Your contact information will be kept confidential to Costume-Con and
>>seated Costume-Con conference committees unless you chose otherwise.
>>Any outside organization receiving information we collect must agree
>>not to further distribute your contact information without your
>>explicit permission.
>>
>>
>>Costume-Con may share my contact information with (check as many as you
>>wish)
>>[ ] Costume-Con Bid Committees
>>[ ] The International Costumers' Guild and its chapters
>>[ ] Other non-profit costume, needlework and costume-craft organizations
>>
>>
>>——–
>>
>>
>>Gives us a ton of flexibility while maintaining what ought to be a
>>reasonable level of trust.

Group: runacc Message: 428 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: internet marketing…

so I expect some of you have noticed that I'm trolling for costume
mailing lists, particularly the ones that get good recommendations from
people.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
"Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to"
— Donna Barr

Group: runacc Message: 429 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…

I saw, and wondered why you did not include this list. It makes sense now.
Good idea! Not much in the way of pats or pans so far, but it's early days
yet.

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.

>
>so I expect some of you have noticed that I'm trolling for costume
>mailing lists, particularly the ones that get good recommendations from
>people.
>
>andy
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
>"Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to"
> — Donna Barr
>

_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage.
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/

Group: runacc Message: 430 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…

On Feb 18, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:

> I saw, and wondered why you did not include this list. It makes sense
> now.
> Good idea! Not much in the way of pats or pans so far, but it's early
> days
> yet.

Mind you, if you want to post here what costume email lists you're on,
that wouldn't be a bad thing.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It's the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

Group: runacc Message: 431 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…

Only this and ICG-D. Got no time for any more, and I'm on these mostly from
work!

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.

>From: Andrew T Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>

>Mind you, if you want to post here what costume email lists you're on,
>that wouldn't be a bad thing.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Group: runacc Message: 432 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Re: internet marketing…

Happier to do it here, because of the spam possibilities…

* ICG-D

* ICG-BOD

* CostumeDC (a Washington-centric list for costume announcements – note
the moderator is fairly strict on posting events outside of the
Balt-Wash area)

* TF (not costume per se, but it does cover a lot of ground re
masquerades when the TechnoFandom crowd is involved. I got on the list
because of CCXV, and they haven't kicked me off yet…8-) )

* TuesdayNite Costumers (a regular sewing group meeting in NoVa and Md –
Sometimes even at my house, though not since the baby arrived.)

Note also that Susan de G. is working on setting up a mailing list
specifically for the Sick Pups, since I'm presently too busy to do it
myself.

There's also F-Costume (if it's still active), but I haven't been a
member of it or H-Costume in quite some time.

The highest volume lists by far are ICG-D and TF.

Cheers,

Betsy

(And if you compile the list of ways to subscribe to these lists, I'll
post them on the CC links page.)

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>
> On Feb 18, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:
> > I saw, and wondered why you did not include this list. It makes sense
> > now.
> > Good idea! Not much in the way of pats or pans so far, but it's early
> > days
> > yet.
>
> Mind you, if you want to post here what costume email lists you're on,
> that wouldn't be a bad thing.
>
> —
> Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
> The Bovine Illuminati (It's the Cows, Inc.)
> http://www.bovil.com/
> Moo!
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 433 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 2/18/2004
Subject: Thought you might like to know…

That I've been approached by a programmer (again) to cause the content
of the main guts of the CC site to be dynamically driven by a database
and PHP. She contacted me out of the blue about two weeks ago, and she's
working now on the initial input tables for creating the "new and
improved" new and improved site.

She's hoping to have something to look at by the time CC22 starts.

I'll be bringing my new "toy" (my laptop) with me to the con. Will there
be a scanner available? I can easily transfer a lot of stuff to the
machine either by plugging directly into another Windows box
(ethernet-capable) or by CD-ROM.

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 434 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 2/19/2004
Subject: Re: Thought you might like to know…

Betsy –

We were thinking of bringing the new all-in-one (scanner, printer, copier)
with us.

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: Run a Costume-Con Mailing List <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [runacc] Thought you might like to know…
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:52:34 -0500
>
>That I've been approached by a programmer (again) to cause the content
>of the main guts of the CC site to be dynamically driven by a database
>and PHP. She contacted me out of the blue about two weeks ago, and she's
>working now on the initial input tables for creating the "new and
>improved" new and improved site.
>
>She's hoping to have something to look at by the time CC22 starts.
>
>I'll be bringing my new "toy" (my laptop) with me to the con. Will there
>be a scanner available? I can easily transfer a lot of stuff to the
>machine either by plugging directly into another Windows box
>(ethernet-capable) or by CD-ROM.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Betsy
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage.
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/

Group: runacc Message: 435 From: Elaine Mami Date: 2/19/2004
Subject: Re: Thought you might like to know…

Betsy,

Check with Carl. I think he has plans to bring the scanner, since he will
be driving down.

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused.

>I'll be bringing my new "toy" (my laptop) with me to the con. Will there
>be a scanner available? I can easily transfer a lot of stuff to the
>machine either by plugging directly into another Windows box
>(ethernet-capable) or by CD-ROM.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Say �good-bye� to spam, viruses and pop-ups with MSN Premium — free trial
offer! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200359ave/direct/01/

Group: runacc Message: 436 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/20/2004
Subject: Compliance?

So I was thinking…

(I know, a dangerous occupation)

…about how Karen mentioned that past CC's hadn't necessarily met all
of their obligations to her or the archives.

I think I can see a root of that problem.

The con-chair has a ton of responsibility, but it's his/her
responsibility to the committee and the membership to produce a good
con that's most important. Little details of compliance that won't get
noticed by anybody but Betsy and Karen tend to get pushed to the side
in favor of big items that the membership will notice.

Each CC committee needs some sort of "compliance officer" who isn't the
con-chair to make sure that Karen and Betsy get sent the documentation
they need, and that the committee meets the requirements of the
Con-Stitution.

Job responsibilities would include:
Keeping current on Con-Stitutional and traditional obligations
Keeping the con-chair and department heads appraised of their
responsibilities to CC
Collecting and delivering copies of all official documentation
Documenting and/or collecting records of competitions
Collecting and submitting all waivers and releases


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
"It's not pink; it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky." –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

Group: runacc Message: 437 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/20/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?

Andy —

This is the first message from a yahoogroups group that I have received in
days! Road Runner is my ISP. Road Runner's new spam filter rejects all
mail posted from a yahoogroups address because it believes that yahoogroups
is guilty of spam. I was just about to resign from all my yahoogroups
groups and change my ISP when your message came in.

How the ____ did it get through the spam filter?

You have given me new hope.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: "Andrew T Trembley" <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:31 PM
Subject: [runacc] Compliance?

> So I was thinking…
>
> (I know, a dangerous occupation)
>
> …about how Karen mentioned that past CC's hadn't necessarily met all
> of their obligations to her or the archives.
>
> I think I can see a root of that problem.
>
> The con-chair has a ton of responsibility, but it's his/her
> responsibility to the committee and the membership to produce a good
> con that's most important. Little details of compliance that won't get
> noticed by anybody but Betsy and Karen tend to get pushed to the side
> in favor of big items that the membership will notice.
>
> Each CC committee needs some sort of "compliance officer" who isn't the
> con-chair to make sure that Karen and Betsy get sent the documentation
> they need, and that the committee meets the requirements of the
> Con-Stitution.
>
> Job responsibilities would include:
> Keeping current on Con-Stitutional and traditional obligations
> Keeping the con-chair and department heads appraised of their
> responsibilities to CC
> Collecting and delivering copies of all official documentation
> Documenting and/or collecting records of competitions
> Collecting and submitting all waivers and releases
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
> http://www.bovil.com/
> "It's not pink; it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky." –Manfred Pfirsich
> Marie Rommel

Group: runacc Message: 438 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/21/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?

Andy, most concoms have difficulty filling the standard positions, with
some committee members pulling double- and triple- duty. So inventing yet
another position is NOT a solution.

How hard is it to just write into the job description of Pubs that they owe
one copy of everything to the Trademark Holder and the Archivist, and how
hard is it to write into the job description of the photographer /
videographer that they need to provide a copy of everything to the Archivist?

–Karen

At 05:31 PM 2/20/2004 -0800, you wrote:

>So I was thinking…
>
>(I know, a dangerous occupation)
>
>…about how Karen mentioned that past CC's hadn't necessarily met all
>of their obligations to her or the archives.
>
>I think I can see a root of that problem.
>
>The con-chair has a ton of responsibility, but it's his/her
>responsibility to the committee and the membership to produce a good
>con that's most important. Little details of compliance that won't get
>noticed by anybody but Betsy and Karen tend to get pushed to the side
>in favor of big items that the membership will notice.
>
>Each CC committee needs some sort of "compliance officer" who isn't the
>con-chair to make sure that Karen and Betsy get sent the documentation
>they need, and that the committee meets the requirements of the
>Con-Stitution.
>
>Job responsibilities would include:
>Keeping current on Con-Stitutional and traditional obligations
>Keeping the con-chair and department heads appraised of their
>responsibilities to CC
>Collecting and delivering copies of all official documentation
>Documenting and/or collecting records of competitions
>Collecting and submitting all waivers and releases
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>http://www.bovil.com/
>"It's not pink; it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky." –Manfred Pfirsich
>Marie Rommel
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Group: runacc Message: 439 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 2/21/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?

Karen Dick wrote:

> How hard is it to just write into the job description of Pubs that they owe
> one copy of everything to the Trademark Holder and the Archivist, and how
> hard is it to write into the job description of the photographer /
> videographer that they need to provide a copy of everything to the Archivist?

And write into the job description of the masquerade directors that they
owe a copy of the results and the waivers

And write into the job description of reg that they owe the rosters.

And a bunch of other departments too.

Nearly every department has obligations which can be lost in favor of
more immediate concerns even if they're written into the job
descriptions. It's not just a matter of making sure things get done
after the fact; it's making sure that things are properly set up in
advance so it's easy to do them.

andy

Group: runacc Message: 440 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/22/2004
Subject: Re: Compliance?

In a message dated 2/20/2004 7:33:08 PM Central Standard Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> Each CC committee needs some sort of "compliance officer" who isn't the
> con-chair to make sure that Karen and Betsy get sent the documentation
> they need, and that the committee meets the requirements of the
> Con-Stitution.

Andy,
Believe it or not, I have been thinking that IF I ever would run a CC
again, I would create a position of Co-Chair In Charge Of Making Sure The I's
Are Dotted And The T's Are Crossed. But your title is much shorter than mine.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 441 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 2/22/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

I'm sorry for the late reply to this. I've been in the year-end back hole
at work since Jan. and am only now getting caught up on my e-mails.

CC19 received money from CC's 15, 16, and 17. (We received money from CC15
only because CC16 had already happened by the time CC15's books were
closed.) My memory tells me we also received money from CC18, but I can't
find the record of it at the moment.

We passed money onto CC20, 21 and 22, and also made a donation to the ICG
archives.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–
From: henryosier@cs.com [mailto:henryosier@cs.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 5:49 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Cc: gboettcher1@wi.rr.com; jakelley@jennifarse.com; LteBear@aol.com;
Bawsews@aol.com
Subject: [runacc] Information Request

Hello!
Could all previous CostumeCon chairs mention how many upcoming CostumeCons
they passed money along to, as well as which CostumeCon they chaired? I know
that this topic has been brought up before, but this information is needed
again.
Thanks in advance!

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Group: runacc Message: 442 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 2/23/2004
Subject: Re: Information Request

Eileen,
Thanks for the reply, even if after all this time! See you in Atlanta?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 443 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Meeting at CC22?

Hey!

I'm thinking we should do this in Atlanta, while we have the chance.

Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet? I'll be arriving
Thursday at some point, involved in the ICG meeting Friday, and leaving
Monday.

I'm not presently scheduled for anything – no panels, no masquerades, no
nada.

Comments?

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 444 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

In a message dated 3/10/2004 3:31:44 PM Central Standard Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:

> Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet?

I suggest either Friday or Sunday breakfast. I'd say Saturday breakfast, but
I'm running the Fashion Police Precinct Party in the ConSuite.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Group: runacc Message: 445 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

Other than the ICG meeting and the times I'm running the green rooms, I am
available.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: "Betsy Delaney" <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
To: "Run a Costume-Con Mailing List" <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: [runacc] Meeting at CC22?

> Hey!
>
> I'm thinking we should do this in Atlanta, while we have the chance.
>
> Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet? I'll be arriving
> Thursday at some point, involved in the ICG meeting Friday, and leaving
> Monday.
>
> I'm not presently scheduled for anything – no panels, no masquerades, no
> nada.
>
> Comments?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Betsy
> —
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Web Mistress at large

Group: runacc Message: 446 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 3/10/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

On Mar 10, 2004, at 1:37 PM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:

> In a message dated 3/10/2004 3:31:44 PM Central Standard Time,
> betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
>> Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet?
> I suggest either Friday or Sunday breakfast. I'd say Saturday
> breakfast, but
> I'm running the Fashion Police Precinct Party in the ConSuite.
> Henry Osier

I prefer brunch to breakfast myself.

Saturday night Kevin and I are hosting ConSuite, so that's right out 😉

Other times are pretty open right now.

Friday or Sunday morning would probably be OK, with Friday being
preferred by me.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
(Kevin's)
"It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

Group: runacc Message: 447 From: Karen Heim Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

So Friday would either be: before the ICG meeting (ugh)
or after the ICG meeting (OK).

Sunday morning? Oh no. No no no. Bruce, Nora, and I are all involved
with the Future Fashion Show; that will be our focus Sunday morning. We
are also all involved with the Historical Masquerade; Sunday is *full*.

Karen

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

> On Mar 10, 2004, at 1:37 PM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 3/10/2004 3:31:44 PM Central Standard Time,
> > betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> >> Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet?
> > I suggest either Friday or Sunday breakfast. I'd say Saturday
> > breakfast, but
> > I'm running the Fashion Police Precinct Party in the ConSuite.
> > Henry Osier
>
> I prefer brunch to breakfast myself.
>
> Saturday night Kevin and I are hosting ConSuite, so that's right out 😉
>
> Other times are pretty open right now.
>
> Friday or Sunday morning would probably be OK, with Friday being
> preferred by me.
>

Group: runacc Message: 448 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

I have NO time at CC-22. I'm in all 3 events, plus judging the SP, plus
having a dealer's table.

Plus I have NO $$ for restaurant food. (Can you say $$$,$$$ in debt since
9/11 and contemplating bankruptcy? I knew you could.)

–Karen

At 06:18 PM 3/10/2004 -0800, you wrote:

>On Mar 10, 2004, at 1:37 PM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 3/10/2004 3:31:44 PM Central Standard Time,
> > betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> >> Anyone have a suggestion for a good time to meet?
> > I suggest either Friday or Sunday breakfast. I'd say Saturday
> > breakfast, but
> > I'm running the Fashion Police Precinct Party in the ConSuite.
> > Henry Osier
>
>I prefer brunch to breakfast myself.
>
>Saturday night Kevin and I are hosting ConSuite, so that's right out 😉
>
>Other times are pretty open right now.
>
>Friday or Sunday morning would probably be OK, with Friday being
>preferred by me.
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – '72 R75/5 '86 R100 (mine) – '92 K75sa '03 R1150R
>(Kevin's)
> "It's not pink, it's peach-colored. Pink is tacky."
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
>read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
>read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
>read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Group: runacc Message: 449 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

How many of us are arriving Thursday night? An informal chat session was
really what I had in mind, nothing "programmed" or official.

I don't know what time we'll be getting in to the hotel – we're probably
stopping somewhere around Raleigh/Durham on the way down, so the days
are broken into two three-hundred mile chunks.

Thoughts?

Betsy



Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Group: runacc Message: 450 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 3/11/2004
Subject: Re: Meeting at CC22?

Betsy –

We will have the Con-Suite open on Thursday night for people to pick up
their memberships, and some socializing. You guys are welcome to hang out
in there.

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Meeting at CC22?
>Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:58:20 -0500
>
>How many of us are arriving Thursday night? An informal chat session was
>really what I had in mind, nothing "programmed" or official.
>
>I don't know what time we'll be getting in to the hotel – we're probably
>stopping somewhere around Raleigh/Durham on the way down, so the days
>are broken into two three-hundred mile chunks.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Betsy
>
>–
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Find things fast with the new MSN Toolbar � includes FREE pop-up blocking!
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/


Yahoo Archive: Page 8 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 8 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 351 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 352 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 353 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 354 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 355 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 356 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 357 From: Tina Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 358 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 359 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 360 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 361 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 362 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 363 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 364 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: CC21 certificates
Group: runacc Message: 365 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 366 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 367 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 368 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 369 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 370 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 371 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 372 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 10/31/2003
Subject: CC23
Group: runacc Message: 373 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 10/31/2003
Subject: previous message
Group: runacc Message: 374 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 375 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 376 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 377 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 378 From: Byron Connell Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 379 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 11/20/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 380 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 11/20/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 381 From: Charles Galway Date: 11/22/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC
Group: runacc Message: 382 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 383 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 384 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 385 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 386 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 387 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 388 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 389 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 390 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 391 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 392 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 393 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 394 From: Tina Connell Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 395 From: Kevin Roche Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 396 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 397 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 398 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 399 From: s_trembley@yahoo.com Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
Group: runacc Message: 400 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: Baptistown

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 351 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

It was my impression that a significant reason for Worldcon moving to a three-year cycle was because major venues expected to be reserved at least three years in advance and concoms were finding it difficult to hire the space only two years out. That might not apply to a smaller CC, however. In addition, times may have changed, since this apparently was not a significant concern for the business meeting at Torcon.

There does seem to be a real problem of holding a concom together for three years, as well as a problem of having little if anything to tell the members during the first 12 to 18 months after winning the bid on a three-year cycle.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] worldcon fallout…

At 12:14 AM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>In a message dated 09/27/2003 4:34:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>attrembl@bovil.com writes:
>
> > The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years to
> > 2 years. This will not take effect unless the amendment is ratified at
> > Noreascon 4.
> >

Andy, was a reason given why Worldcon wants to change to a shorter cycle?

At the time they went to 3 years, it was because Worldcon had gotten so
huge that it took more time, logistics, etc. to get a committee together
and prepare all the necessary stuff.

I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted a
bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their potential
hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.

Discussion, anyone?

–Karen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 352 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

Actually that’s Bruce & Pierre as co-chairs – I’m Pubs & stuff this time.
Since we’ve never been able to get a hotel to want to lock in 3+years out
and have certainly gone through the personnel carousel that Trudy describes,
2 years might be more funcitonal.
I also agree with Andy (I think it was Andy) that it is hard to maintain the
enthusiasm and excitement 6-8 years.
Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
> I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted a
> bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
> they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their
potential
> hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.

 

Group: runacc Message: 353 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

That’s a very valid point, Byron.

But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
Guide is up and running?

Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document, guaranteed.

–Karen

At 07:56 PM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>I do not agree. The ConStitution is the framework under which CCs are
>run. As such, I believe that it should not include nonmandatory
>suggestions. A list of possible activities would be appropriate for a CC
>Runners’ Guide.
>
>Byron
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition
>
>
> At 11:26 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
> >I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
> >Competition”.
> >
> >Marty
>
>
> I also would vote for (b). A listing of possible activities, none of which
> are required, seems to me to be a good guideline for future committees.
> We’ve been experimenting with different activities, displays and
> competitions throughout the history of C-C. Such a list can spark the
> creativity of a committee while re-inforcing the Costume-centric nature of
> C-C’s
>
> Pierre
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 354 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

You’re right–I shoulda said Bruce & Pierre.

–Karen

At 07:08 PM 9/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>Actually that’s Bruce & Pierre as co-chairs – I’m Pubs & stuff this time.
>Since we’ve never been able to get a hotel to want to lock in 3+years out
>and have certainly gone through the personnel carousel that Trudy describes,
>2 years might be more funcitonal.
>I also agree with Andy (I think it was Andy) that it is hard to maintain the
>enthusiasm and excitement 6-8 years.
>Nora
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
> > I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted a
> > bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
> > they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their
>potential
> > hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 355 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 05:39 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> That’s a very valid point, Byron.
>
> But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
> Guide is up and running?
>
> Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document,
> guaranteed.

Well, once we’ve got a guide, we can add to the bid paperwork
requirement a copy of the constitution and the guide with signature
blanks indicating that the principals have read and understand them or
they don’t get on the ballot 😉


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 356 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

>A. A brief history
>Costume-Con was born out of the vision of Adrienne Martinez (Adrienne
>Martine-Barnes),

Does anyone have a current address for Adrienne? Her PR for CC22 was
returned by the post office.

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE!
http://msnmessenger-download.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 357 From: Tina Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

She’s almost certainly a SFWA (SF Writers Ass’n.) member. One of us must know a SFWA member who would be willing to help us out with the address – I believe that they used to send all members an annual address list.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Trudy Leonard
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] section 1 outline/draft

>A. A brief history
>Costume-Con was born out of the vision of Adrienne Martinez (Adrienne
>Martine-Barnes),

Does anyone have a current address for Adrienne? Her PR for CC22 was
returned by the post office.

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE!
http://msnmessenger-download.com

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 358 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Ok – two things:

Karen, I tried to write this in the most diplomatic, least
“finger-pointing” way possible, but if I got something wrong or left
something out, or if it’s simply too much information, PLEASE correct
the copy below! 1997/98 was a LOOOOONNNNNGGGGG time ago!

Thanks!

Betsy

Andrew Trembley wrote:

>
> Sec 1 should be easy, and relatively short…
>
> B. The process in a nutshell…

[Don’t forget, when we get to the guts of this doc, we’ve got a live
“How to Bid doc that should be incorporated into this one. The link to
this doc is:

http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/howtobid.shtml ]

> C. The ConStitution
> <When was the constitution originally drafted? Insert capsule history
> here.>

Costume-Con is (and always has been) an event independent of, but
coexisting with, the International Costumers’ Guild, Inc. (ICG). In the
mists of time, this distinction was lost.

When Costume-Con 10 was bid on by more than one committee for the first
time, the board and officers of the ICG determined that guidance of site
selection and establishment of procedures for managing committees was
necessary. Procedures were subsequently incorporated into the ICG’s
Standing Rules, where they remained until April, 2003, when the last of
the rules were extracted.

At Costume-Con Fifteen, in May, 1997, a series of problems and issues
with one of the existing committees was discovered. By the WorldCon in
1997 [insert location and subtitle here], further investigation,
including conversations with the Costume-Con Service Mark Holders, made
it clear that the conference needed its own set of governing documents,
and that the erroneous rules established in the ICG’s Standing Rules
were not appropriate.

In April, 1998, Karen Dick provided a draft for what is now the
Costume-Con ConStitution, based on the Westercon Constitution, to a
group of readers for comment and improvement. This committee, comprised
of the following individuals: Karen Dick, Kevin Standlee, Betsy R.
Delaney, Joy Day, Byron Connell, Ken Warren, Pierre Pettinger, Susan de
Guardiola, Alys Hay, John Trimble, Bjo Trimble and Lora Boehm, worked
for approximately five months to draft and correct the document, which
was released to the public in late September, 1998.

Since its original release, the ConStitution has been adjusted
repeatedly to ensure that it covers all potential issues raised during
the course of a Costume-Con committee’s activities. All Costume-Con
committees agree to abide by and uphold the ConStitution as part of
their agreement for using the name Costume-Con and are also responsible
for enforcing the provisions of the ConStitution.


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 359 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Reads fine to me.

–Karen

At 12:19 PM 9/30/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Ok – two things:
>
>Karen, I tried to write this in the most diplomatic, least
>”finger-pointing” way possible, but if I got something wrong or left
>something out, or if it’s simply too much information, PLEASE correct
>the copy below! 1997/98 was a LOOOOONNNNNGGGGG time ago!
>
>Thanks!
>
>Betsy
>
>Andrew Trembley wrote:
> >
> > Sec 1 should be easy, and relatively short…
> >
> > B. The process in a nutshell…
>
>[Don’t forget, when we get to the guts of this doc, we’ve got a live
>”How to Bid doc that should be incorporated into this one. The link to
>this doc is:
>
> http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/howtobid.shtml ]
>
> > C. The ConStitution
> > <When was the constitution originally drafted? Insert capsule history
> > here.>
>
>Costume-Con is (and always has been) an event independent of, but
>coexisting with, the International Costumers’ Guild, Inc. (ICG). In the
>mists of time, this distinction was lost.
>
>When Costume-Con 10 was bid on by more than one committee for the first
>time, the board and officers of the ICG determined that guidance of site
>selection and establishment of procedures for managing committees was
>necessary. Procedures were subsequently incorporated into the ICG’s
>Standing Rules, where they remained until April, 2003, when the last of
>the rules were extracted.
>
>At Costume-Con Fifteen, in May, 1997, a series of problems and issues
>with one of the existing committees was discovered. By the WorldCon in
>1997 [insert location and subtitle here], further investigation,
>including conversations with the Costume-Con Service Mark Holders, made
>it clear that the conference needed its own set of governing documents,
>and that the erroneous rules established in the ICG’s Standing Rules
>were not appropriate.
>
>In April, 1998, Karen Dick provided a draft for what is now the
>Costume-Con ConStitution, based on the Westercon Constitution, to a
>group of readers for comment and improvement. This committee, comprised
>of the following individuals: Karen Dick, Kevin Standlee, Betsy R.
>Delaney, Joy Day, Byron Connell, Ken Warren, Pierre Pettinger, Susan de
>Guardiola, Alys Hay, John Trimble, Bjo Trimble and Lora Boehm, worked
>for approximately five months to draft and correct the document, which
>was released to the public in late September, 1998.
>
>Since its original release, the ConStitution has been adjusted
>repeatedly to ensure that it covers all potential issues raised during
>the course of a Costume-Con committee’s activities. All Costume-Con
>committees agree to abide by and uphold the ConStitution as part of
>their agreement for using the name Costume-Con and are also responsible
>for enforcing the provisions of the ConStitution.
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 360 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

Epiphany time: We could temporarily include the info in the How to Bid
doc, until that get’s incorporated into the total document.

Thoughts?

-B

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> That’s a very valid point, Byron.
>
> But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
> Guide is up and running?
>
> Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document, guaranteed.
>
> –Karen
>
> At 07:56 PM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >I do not agree. The ConStitution is the framework under which CCs are
> >run. As such, I believe that it should not include nonmandatory
> >suggestions. A list of possible activities would be appropriate for a CC
> >Runners’ Guide.
> >
> >Byron
> >
> >
> > —– Original Message —–
> > From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger
> > To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition
> >
> >
> > At 11:26 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
> > >I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
> > >Competition”.
> > >
> > >Marty
> >
> >
> > I also would vote for (b). A listing of possible activities, none of which
> > are required, seems to me to be a good guideline for future committees.
> > We’ve been experimenting with different activities, displays and
> > competitions throughout the history of C-C. Such a list can spark the
> > creativity of a committee while re-inforcing the Costume-centric nature of
> > C-C’s
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 361 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

How about posting the list on the CostumeCon-nections web site? It — and any other nonmandatory ideas Betsy is willing to add — could be noted promptly on the table of contents in a file that is separate from the ConStitution.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition

That’s a very valid point, Byron.

But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
Guide is up and running?

Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document, guaranteed.

–Karen

At 07:56 PM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>I do not agree. The ConStitution is the framework under which CCs are
>run. As such, I believe that it should not include nonmandatory
>suggestions. A list of possible activities would be appropriate for a CC
>Runners’ Guide.
>
>Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 362 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

Good idea.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 05:39 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> That’s a very valid point, Byron.
>
> But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
> Guide is up and running?
>
> Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document,
> guaranteed.

Well, once we’ve got a guide, we can add to the bid paperwork
requirement a copy of the constitution and the guide with signature
blanks indicating that the principals have read and understand them or
they don’t get on the ballot 😉


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 363 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

That would work.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition

Epiphany time: We could temporarily include the info in the How to Bid
doc, until that get’s incorporated into the total document.

Thoughts?

-B

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> That’s a very valid point, Byron.
>
> But where do we put the list of possible activities until the Runner’s
> Guide is up and running?
>
> Then again, some newbie committees will not read *either* document, guaranteed.
>
> –Karen
>
> At 07:56 PM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >I do not agree. The ConStitution is the framework under which CCs are
> >run. As such, I believe that it should not include nonmandatory
> >suggestions. A list of possible activities would be appropriate for a CC
> >Runners’ Guide.
> >
> >Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 364 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/30/2003
Subject: CC21 certificates
Andy –

Certificates arrive in Atlanta sometime this weekend. Thank you very much,
and I will distribute them to all parties involved.

Trudy

PS – Are you guys coming to Atlanta and, if so, do you want to do a bid
party? Also, did you want to put an ad in either the PR or Program Book?
I’m about to have Lonnie put some new information up on the website,
including ad rates and Con Suite sponsorships. It occured to me that you
weren’t getting the PR’s and there might be information that you would need.

_________________________________________________________________
Help protect your PC. Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

 

Group: runacc Message: 365 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document) but I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: [runacc] section 1 outline/draft

Sec 1 should be easy, and relatively short…

A. A brief history
Costume-Con was born out of the vision of Adrienne Martinez (Adrienne
Martine-Barnes), and first realized in 1983 by Karen Dick, Kelly Turner
and a crew of amateur and professional science fiction and historical
costumers in southern California. It began as (and still is) a
costume-centered weekend of competitions, classes, panel discussions
and social events. At Costume-Con 3 (1985) in Columbia, Maryland, the
International Costumers’ Guild was founded, bringing together costume
organizations from around the world; Costume-Con and the ICG have
enjoyed a symbiotic relationship ever since.

In the last two decades, Costume-Con has grown and adapted to the needs
and interests of its members. Committees have introduced new seminars,
social activities and competitions. Some have failed, some have
succeeded and a few have developed into new “traditional” activities.

For a detailed history of Costume-Con, please see the timeline at
http://www.costume-con.org/CClink/index.shtml.

B. The process in a nutshell…
If you’re reading this, you’re probably interested in putting together
a Costume-Con. Costume-Con is not operated year-to-year by the same
organization and staff. It is overseen by Karen Dick and Kelly Turner,
the holders of the “Costume-Con” trademark, but each year planning and
operations are the responsibility of a conference committee.

Putting together a Costume-Con is a multi-year process, so there are
always at least 3 seated conference committees active, and often
several “bid committees” exploring the possibility of running a
Costume-Con or actively campaigning to be selected to run a Costume-Con.

A conference committee starts, as mentioned above, with bidding. During
the bid phase, the conference committee develops its business
structure, obtains hotel/facilities agreements, and campaigns to get
people to attend or support the costume-con where their bid is voted
upon. This is at minimum a 6-month process (the deadline to be placed
on the ballot is 6 months before the vote) but is often done over a
period of 1-2 years.

After a conference committee has won their bid, they’re described as a
“seated conference committee” and have approximately 3 years to
complete the planning for their conference. During this time, the
marketing and promotion of the conference continues.

All of this culminates in the actual conference: panel discussions,
seminars, social events and competitions. It’s not over, though, when
the conference is done. It often takes a few weeks (sometimes a few
months) to wind up final business after the conference.

All in all, that’s 4-6 years from start to finish. A long time, yes,
but enough time to spread the workload out if you and your committee
pace things carefully.

C. The ConStitution
<When was the constitution originally drafted? Insert capsule history
here.>

Minimum performance standards and responsibilities are laid out in the
ConStitution. Note that carefully: Minimum performance standards and
responsibilities. The ConStitution isn’t a recipe for how to run a
Costume-Con.

As a conference committee member, you should be intimately familiar
with the contents of the ConStitution, and what it requires of you.
Conversely, when somebody tells you something is required, you should
review the ConStitution for yourself and determine whether that is
still true or not.

The ConStitution is a living document and is amended on a regular
basis. For the convenience and sanity of conference committees,
revisions will generally be made in the 60 days immediately following
the annual conference and not made in the 6 months leading up to the
next conference. Still, it is best to review the Constitution on a
regular basis.

If you have any questions about expectations or responsibilities of
your committee, ask them.

For more information, including contact information, see the
ConStitution at
http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/ccconstitution.shtml

D. The ICG Masquerade Guidelines
Several years ago, Costume-Con agreed to operate its costume
competitions in accordance with the ICG Masquerade Guidelines.

As the name says, these are guidelines. Their purpose is to help
competition directors write their rules and operate their competitions
in a manner that is fair and impartial. While they’re framed for
competition masquerades, there are aspects of the guidelines which may
be applicable to other competitions. Committee chairpersons and
competition directors should review the guidelines on a regular basis.

If you are uncertain about how to interpret any part of the guidelines,
the best course of action is to talk with past competition directors
and ask them how they interpreted the guidelines in the past, and how
their interpretations worked for them.

For more information, see the ICG Masquerade Guidelines at
http://www.costume.org/documents/guidelines.html

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 366 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Tina, Costume-Con is a registered trademark (R in the circle). I gave up
$$$ and most of a year of my life to accomplish this.

–Karen

At 07:04 AM 10/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document) but
>I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”
>
>Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 367 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

You’re probably thinking of the “SM” because it was there as a placeholder
until the “R” was completed. Didn’t mean to be snippy.

–Karen

At 07:04 AM 10/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document) but
>I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”
>
>Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 368 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 04:04 AM, Tina Connell wrote:

> Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document)
> but I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”

A “service mark” is a class of trademark; “service mark” describes the
way in which the mark is used.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 369 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

That’s all right, it’s cool. I think that I was rememberring back to CC18 (for which I had the “privilege” of doing all the publications) in which I remembered typing Service Mark over and over again for the PR’s and program book. That was undoubtedly before you had your TM finalized. A gen-u-wine TM is much better!.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] section 1 outline/draft

You’re probably thinking of the “SM” because it was there as a placeholder
until the “R” was completed. Didn’t mean to be snippy.

–Karen

At 07:04 AM 10/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document) but
>I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”
>
>Tina

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 370 From: Tina Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Note my reply to Karen – I was in error. Sorry!

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] section 1 outline/draft

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 04:04 AM, Tina Connell wrote:
> Andy, I’m not certain (without going back and looking at the document)
> but I think that “trademark” should probably be “service mark.”

A “service mark” is a class of trademark; “service mark” describes the
way in which the mark is used.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 371 From: Byron Connell Date: 10/2/2003
Subject: Re: section 1 outline/draft

Looks to me like a good way to start.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: [runacc] section 1 outline/draft

Sec 1 should be easy, and relatively short…

A. A brief history
Costume-Con was born out of the vision of Adrienne Martinez (Adrienne
Martine-Barnes), and first realized in 1983 by Karen Dick, Kelly Turner
and a crew of amateur and professional science fiction and historical
costumers in southern California. It began as (and still is) a
costume-centered weekend of competitions, classes, panel discussions
and social events. At Costume-Con 3 (1985) in Columbia, Maryland, the
International Costumers’ Guild was founded, bringing together costume
organizations from around the world; Costume-Con and the ICG have
enjoyed a symbiotic relationship ever since.

In the last two decades, Costume-Con has grown and adapted to the needs
and interests of its members. Committees have introduced new seminars,
social activities and competitions. Some have failed, some have
succeeded and a few have developed into new “traditional” activities.

For a detailed history of Costume-Con, please see the timeline at
http://www.costume-con.org/CClink/index.shtml.

B. The process in a nutshell…
If you’re reading this, you’re probably interested in putting together
a Costume-Con. Costume-Con is not operated year-to-year by the same
organization and staff. It is overseen by Karen Dick and Kelly Turner,
the holders of the “Costume-Con” trademark, but each year planning and
operations are the responsibility of a conference committee.

Putting together a Costume-Con is a multi-year process, so there are
always at least 3 seated conference committees active, and often
several “bid committees” exploring the possibility of running a
Costume-Con or actively campaigning to be selected to run a Costume-Con.

A conference committee starts, as mentioned above, with bidding. During
the bid phase, the conference committee develops its business
structure, obtains hotel/facilities agreements, and campaigns to get
people to attend or support the costume-con where their bid is voted
upon. This is at minimum a 6-month process (the deadline to be placed
on the ballot is 6 months before the vote) but is often done over a
period of 1-2 years.

After a conference committee has won their bid, they’re described as a
“seated conference committee” and have approximately 3 years to
complete the planning for their conference. During this time, the
marketing and promotion of the conference continues.

All of this culminates in the actual conference: panel discussions,
seminars, social events and competitions. It’s not over, though, when
the conference is done. It often takes a few weeks (sometimes a few
months) to wind up final business after the conference.

All in all, that’s 4-6 years from start to finish. A long time, yes,
but enough time to spread the workload out if you and your committee
pace things carefully.

C. The ConStitution
<When was the constitution originally drafted? Insert capsule history
here.>

Minimum performance standards and responsibilities are laid out in the
ConStitution. Note that carefully: Minimum performance standards and
responsibilities. The ConStitution isn’t a recipe for how to run a
Costume-Con.

As a conference committee member, you should be intimately familiar
with the contents of the ConStitution, and what it requires of you.
Conversely, when somebody tells you something is required, you should
review the ConStitution for yourself and determine whether that is
still true or not.

The ConStitution is a living document and is amended on a regular
basis. For the convenience and sanity of conference committees,
revisions will generally be made in the 60 days immediately following
the annual conference and not made in the 6 months leading up to the
next conference. Still, it is best to review the Constitution on a
regular basis.

If you have any questions about expectations or responsibilities of
your committee, ask them.

For more information, including contact information, see the
ConStitution at
http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/ccconstitution.shtml

D. The ICG Masquerade Guidelines
Several years ago, Costume-Con agreed to operate its costume
competitions in accordance with the ICG Masquerade Guidelines.

As the name says, these are guidelines. Their purpose is to help
competition directors write their rules and operate their competitions
in a manner that is fair and impartial. While they’re framed for
competition masquerades, there are aspects of the guidelines which may
be applicable to other competitions. Committee chairpersons and
competition directors should review the guidelines on a regular basis.

If you are uncertain about how to interpret any part of the guidelines,
the best course of action is to talk with past competition directors
and ask them how they interpreted the guidelines in the past, and how
their interpretations worked for them.

For more information, see the ICG Masquerade Guidelines at
http://www.costume.org/documents/guidelines.html

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 372 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 10/31/2003
Subject: CC23
I know that some of you are on the ICG-D list and already know this, but for
those who aren’t – the membership rates go up today for us and for Utah.
Ours go from $65 if purchased by today, to $75 until the convention ($85 at
door). Utah’s is $50 through today, not sure what it goes up to. You can
download a membership form for them at www.crossroadsutah.org.

If you have friends who are planning to attend either Con, you might want to
remind them to get it in today.

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 373 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 10/31/2003
Subject: previous message
Oops, sorry. That message was suppposed to go to the CC22 committee members.
Apologies.

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded
its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage!
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

 

Group: runacc Message: 374 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Utah CC
Has anyone heard anything from the Utah bid lately? Their website hasn’t
changed in months. Any info?

Nora Mai

 

Group: runacc Message: 375 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 04:21 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Has anyone heard anything from the Utah bid lately? Their website
> hasn’t
> changed in months. Any info?

I got an email from Keri confirming my registrations.

As for the website not changing in months, well, I think many of us
have that problem. Kevin and I haven’t got back to the CC26 website in
months, and I’ve still got a lot of material to add.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 376 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
Subject: Re: [runacc] Utah CC

> I got an email from Keri confirming my registrations.

When? Recently?

> As for the website not changing in months, well, I think many of us
> have that problem. Kevin and I haven’t got back to the CC26 website in
> months, and I’ve still got a lot of material to add.

Yeah, but you’re still a bid. They’re an official Con and only a year and a
half out. The website is a quick and useful tool for established CC
attendees and newbies to get the latest info.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 377 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 03:56 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Utah CC
>> I got an email from Keri confirming my registrations.
>
> When? Recently?

earlier this week.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 378 From: Byron Connell Date: 11/19/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

I have not heard anything recently.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:21 AM
Subject: [runacc] Utah CC

Has anyone heard anything from the Utah bid lately? Their website hasn’t
changed in months. Any info?

Nora Mai

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 379 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 11/20/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

I also received a confirmation of my membership which I sent in on Oct. 31.
I haven’t heard anything else, though. At the moment, I don’t think that
anyone on their committee is registered as a member for CC22. We did put a
plug in PR#3 for them, but no one has contacted us about advertising or
con-suite sponsorships.

Trudy

>From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Utah CC
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:33:27 -0800
>
>On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 04:21 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Has anyone heard anything from the Utah bid lately? Their website
> > hasn’t
> > changed in months. Any info?
>
>I got an email from Keri confirming my registrations.
>
>As for the website not changing in months, well, I think many of us
>have that problem. Kevin and I haven’t got back to the CC26 website in
>months, and I’ve still got a lot of material to add.
>
>andy
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>http://www.bovil.com/
>”It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
>Marie Rommel
>

_________________________________________________________________
Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment,
video game reviews, and more here.
http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx

 

Group: runacc Message: 380 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 11/20/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

In a message dated 11/20/2003 7:56:21 AM Central Standard Time,
georgialei@hotmail.com writes:

> At the moment, I don’t think that
> anyone on their committee is registered as a member for CC22. We did put a
> plug in PR#3 for them, but no one has contacted us about advertising or
> con-suite sponsorships.

I had the same thing with CC21 and the folks from Utah. I sent some e-mails
back and forth right after CC21, but not a peep since.

Oh, Trudy, e-mail me privately about your CC.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 381 From: Charles Galway Date: 11/22/2003
Subject: Re: Utah CC

Ack!, my e-mail is down for a few days, and then everyone starts talking about us.

Thanks for all the registrations. Keri has the total number, but I think it’s between 5 and 10 new ones that just came in (before Oct. 31)

Nothing new on the web-site, because not much has actually changed. I do have the “year-and-a-half” alarm-bell going off in my head. I also had some local distractions going on this summer with CONduit (re-work of the BoD), but that’s settled down, and so we can get back to CC.

I should say that my (and others) economics have been a bit rough recently, so, aside from the personal distraction that entails, it has also affected my planning of the CC-23 budget. Some of the details have been in a holding pattern, while we see what the market can bear, and who-all’s coming out. We should be able to have the basic convention as planned, but I wanted to make sure we did not over-commit in some areas.

The economics did cut into our traveling, so I really appreciate the support folks have extended to us for the past few cons. We have not registered for Atlanta yet, but will try to get someone out there.

We are getting the vendors lined up. And I figure the future-fashion-folio is the next critical item, (along with all the internal work that now is required).

Some of you have had some contact with us in the past, and we should be getting back to you shortly, about volunteering. Anyone else that wants to help, either in advance, or at the con, please email me directly.

Thanks,

Charles Galway CC-23
cgalway@xmission.com

—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>

On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 04:21 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> Has anyone heard anything from the Utah bid lately? Their website
> hasn’t
> changed in months. Any info?

I got an email from Keri confirming my registrations.

As for the website not changing in months, well, I think many of us
have that problem. Kevin and I haven’t got back to the CC26 website in
months, and I’ve still got a lot of material to add.

andy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 382 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: More marketing…
So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us if
we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said “yes.”
It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and also
a good way to build a relationship with the con.

It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I hate
sitting at fan tables.

Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
programming room for a hour for what is essentially an advertisement,
but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on “costuming
year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
costumes at conventions might be interested in.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 383 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

On this coast, we’re fortunate that both Arisia and Lunacon normally run full (or at least sizable) costume program tracks, which gives us similar exposure. I will bring CC 26 flyers to both cons and expect to hand them to the masquerade entrants as they check in at the respective green rooms. As the green room manager, I certainly won’t object to such blatant marketing and I doubt that the MD (Carl Mami) will. (Arisia is this month, in Boston; Lunacon is in March outside New York.)

I expect to do the same thing at Noreascon 4.

I also hope to give out many costume award ribbons at the cons. I arranged to have one given to every entrant at the Albacon masquerade last October, plus key masquerade gophers, but I still have a fair number to give away.

At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:25 PM
Subject: [runacc] More marketing…

So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us if
we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said “yes.”
It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and also
a good way to build a relationship with the con.

It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I hate
sitting at fan tables.

Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
programming room for a hour for what is essentially an advertisement,
but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on “costuming
year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
costumes at conventions might be interested in.

andy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 384 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

In a message dated 1/6/2004 7:57:20 PM Central Standard Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!

I have been debating starting a new joke bid. Is this my cue?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 385 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/6/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

On Tuesday, January 6, 2004, at 05:46 PM, Byron Connell wrote:

> At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!

The word is marketing. I’m going to assume that in the next 10 months
another bid isn’t going to jump out of a hat, so it’s not about
campaigning, it’s about early marketing.

Bidding CC26 heavily gets people asking about what’s coming up sooner
and/or nearer. One of our fliers includes dates and locations for 22,
23 and 24.

Bidding CC26 heavily (I hope) will result in higher attending and
supporting memberships for Utah from folks who want to vote for us.

Bidding CC26 heavily (I hope) will boost the vote count and voting fees
from Utah, giving our committee more seed money.

But on a more basic level, I think CC generally can benefit.

I think we want to grow our core constituency (the folks who find a way
to come to CC 2 out of every 3 years). I think we also need to build
interest amongst the folks who assume costume-Con isn’t for them. Heavy
bidding, particularly the awards and talking with folks in cool hall
costumes, is a way to let folks know that they’re welcome at a CC.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 386 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Andy –

Would you like some flyers for CC22 to have at the panel? It does sound
like a good opportunity to get the word out to some folks who might not be
aware of Costume-Cons.

Trudy

>From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] More marketing…
>Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:25:51 -0800
>
>So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
>this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us if
>we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said “yes.”
>It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and also
>a good way to build a relationship with the con.
>
>It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I hate
>sitting at fan tables.
>
>Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
>programming room for a hour for what is essentially an advertisement,
>but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
>costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
>programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on “costuming
>year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
>local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
>costumes at conventions might be interested in.
>
>andy
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
>hand
>Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>

_________________________________________________________________
Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work � and
yourself. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx

 

Group: runacc Message: 387 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Byron –

Would you like flyers for CC22?

Trudy

>From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:46:41 -0500
>
>On this coast, we’re fortunate that both Arisia and Lunacon normally run
>full (or at least sizable) costume program tracks, which gives us similar
>exposure. I will bring CC 26 flyers to both cons and expect to hand them
>to the masquerade entrants as they check in at the respective green rooms.
>As the green room manager, I certainly won’t object to such blatant
>marketing and I doubt that the MD (Carl Mami) will. (Arisia is this month,
>in Boston; Lunacon is in March outside New York.)
>
>I expect to do the same thing at Noreascon 4.
>
>I also hope to give out many costume award ribbons at the cons. I arranged
>to have one given to every entrant at the Albacon masquerade last October,
>plus key masquerade gophers, but I still have a fair number to give away.
>
>At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
>unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!
>
>Byron
>
>
>—– Original Message —–
> From: Andrew Trembley
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:25 PM
> Subject: [runacc] More marketing…
>
>
> So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
> this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us if
> we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said “yes.”
> It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and also
> a good way to build a relationship with the con.
>
> It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I hate
> sitting at fan tables.
>
> Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
> programming room for a hour for what is essentially an advertisement,
> but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
> costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
> programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on “costuming
> year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
> local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
> costumes at conventions might be interested in.
>
> andy
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access � limited
time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup

 

Group: runacc Message: 388 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

You’re moving to Baptistown?

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…

In a message dated 1/6/2004 7:57:20 PM Central Standard Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:
> At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!
I have been debating starting a new joke bid. Is this my cue?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 389 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Trudy —

Yes. I’ll be happy to give away a bunch of them.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: “Trudy Leonard” <georgialei@hotmail.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…

> Byron –
>
> Would you like flyers for CC22?
>
> Trudy
>
>
> >From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
> >Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:46:41 -0500
> >
> >On this coast, we’re fortunate that both Arisia and Lunacon normally run
> >full (or at least sizable) costume program tracks, which gives us similar
> >exposure. I will bring CC 26 flyers to both cons and expect to hand them
> >to the masquerade entrants as they check in at the respective green
rooms.
> >As the green room manager, I certainly won’t object to such blatant
> >marketing and I doubt that the MD (Carl Mami) will. (Arisia is this
month,
> >in Boston; Lunacon is in March outside New York.)
> >
> >I expect to do the same thing at Noreascon 4.
> >
> >I also hope to give out many costume award ribbons at the cons. I
arranged
> >to have one given to every entrant at the Albacon masquerade last
October,
> >plus key masquerade gophers, but I still have a fair number to give away.
> >
> >At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> >unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!
> >
> >Byron
> >
> >
> >—– Original Message —–
> > From: Andrew Trembley
> > To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:25 PM
> > Subject: [runacc] More marketing…
> >
> >
> > So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
> > this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us if
> > we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said “yes.”
> > It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and
also
> > a good way to build a relationship with the con.
> >
> > It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I
hate
> > sitting at fan tables.
> >
> > Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
> > programming room for a hour for what is essentially an advertisement,
> > but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
> > costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
> > programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on
“costuming
> > year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
> > local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
> > costumes at conventions might be interested in.
> >
> > andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 390 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

On Wednesday, January 7, 2004, at 06:02 AM, Trudy Leonard wrote:

> Andy –
>
> Would you like some flyers for CC22 to have at the panel? It does
> sound
> like a good opportunity to get the word out to some folks who might
> not be
> aware of Costume-Cons.

If you’ve got e-copy, I can print a stack for the panel and for the
con…


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 391 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Andy –

I’ll send you the file tomorrow. Thanks!

Trudy

>From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:36:43 -0800
>
>
>On Wednesday, January 7, 2004, at 06:02 AM, Trudy Leonard wrote:
>
> > Andy –
> >
> > Would you like some flyers for CC22 to have at the panel? It does
> > sound
> > like a good opportunity to get the word out to some folks who might
> > not be
> > aware of Costume-Cons.
>
>If you’ve got e-copy, I can print a stack for the panel and for the
>con…
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
>http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
>”Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
> — Donna Barr
>

_________________________________________________________________
Have fun customizing MSN Messenger � learn how here!
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_customize

 

Group: runacc Message: 392 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 1/7/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Byron –

I will get those into the mail for you. Any estimate on how many you’d like
me to send?

Thanks,

Trudy

>From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:07:10 -0500
>
>Trudy —
>
>Yes. I’ll be happy to give away a bunch of them.
>
>Byron
>
>
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Trudy Leonard” <georgialei@hotmail.com>
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:03 AM
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>
>
> > Byron –
> >
> > Would you like flyers for CC22?
> >
> > Trudy
> >
> >
> > >From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
> > >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
> > >Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:46:41 -0500
> > >
> > >On this coast, we’re fortunate that both Arisia and Lunacon normally
>run
> > >full (or at least sizable) costume program tracks, which gives us
>similar
> > >exposure. I will bring CC 26 flyers to both cons and expect to hand
>them
> > >to the masquerade entrants as they check in at the respective green
>rooms.
> > >As the green room manager, I certainly won’t object to such blatant
> > >marketing and I doubt that the MD (Carl Mami) will. (Arisia is this
>month,
> > >in Boston; Lunacon is in March outside New York.)
> > >
> > >I expect to do the same thing at Noreascon 4.
> > >
> > >I also hope to give out many costume award ribbons at the cons. I
>arranged
> > >to have one given to every entrant at the Albacon masquerade last
>October,
> > >plus key masquerade gophers, but I still have a fair number to give
>away.
> > >
> > >At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> > >unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!
> > >
> > >Byron
> > >
> > >
> > >—– Original Message —–
> > > From: Andrew Trembley
> > > To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:25 PM
> > > Subject: [runacc] More marketing…
> > >
> > >
> > > So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
> > > this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us
>if
> > > we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said
>”yes.”
> > > It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and
>also
> > > a good way to build a relationship with the con.
> > >
> > > It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I
>hate
> > > sitting at fan tables.
> > >
> > > Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
> > > programming room for a hour for what is essentially an
>advertisement,
> > > but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
> > > costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
> > > programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on
>”costuming
> > > year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
> > > local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
> > > costumes at conventions might be interested in.
> > >
> > > andy
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory
offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup

 

Group: runacc Message: 393 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

At 08:30 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote:

>But on a more basic level, I think CC generally can benefit.
>
>I think we want to grow our core constituency (the folks who find a way
>to come to CC 2 out of every 3 years). I think we also need to build
>interest amongst the folks who assume costume-Con isn’t for them. Heavy
>bidding, particularly the awards and talking with folks in cool hall
>costumes, is a way to let folks know that they’re welcome at a CC.

I agree. Many new costumers or one time costumers I’ve talked to seem to
think C-C is only for experienced costumers and will be too complex for
them. Whatever we can do to shoot down that misconception is to be pursued.

Pierre

>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
>hand
>Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 394 From: Tina Connell Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…
I couldn’t agree more. I am a case in point. My first CC was CC3, Baltimore. Except for a couple of hall-costume type things when I was young and foolish (No, I will NOT let anyone see photos of the leather bikini top and loincloth!) I hadn’t done anything; however, I didn’t have any silly ideas about “only for Masters” and wanted to go a) because a bunch of people I knew were going, and b) because I wanted to see a bunch of neat costumes.

However, once I was there, what I mostly did was go to panels & demonstrations. That really saved my ass a few weeks later when my daughter came to me wanting me to make her prom gown, because all the stuff in the stores that year was Ghod-awful. The “How to custom fit a commercial pattern” demo gave me everything I needed to pull it off. When your daughter is 6′ tall and slender with long showgirl legs, fluffy frilly stuff in tacky pink-and-silver lace doesn’t cut it anywhere nearly as well as strapless almost-skin-fit black matte satin. (Pierre, were you and Sandy at CC7, in Albany? If so she was wearing it there. I have a photo of Marty “putting the bite” on her and her girlfriend.)

The beadwork I did on Corwin was immeasurably aided by the many “How to bead” demos and workshops I have attended over the years. The same for tailoring panels, corset making demos, etc. We may have a lot of FUN at CC’s but they and the ICG do really fulfill the “educational” function that our IRS tax-exempt status calls for. We need to convince the newbies, and the not-so-newbies who are still uncertain of their skills, that this is a great resource for them. I think would like to see a “Basics” program track at CC’s which would offer panels/demos which many attendees would consider “the same old thing again” but which newer costumers and wanna-bes could benefit from. Beading 101, Tailoring/Fitting 101, Corsetry 101, etc.

I know that the cost of a membership may seem like a lot (buy early and often, while the rates are low), but as someone who also has to keep a 140 yr. old house repaired, I can safely say that if you want to go to any kind of major rehabbers show or historic preservation conference, it’s pricey, and they charge plenty extra (not just “cost of materials”) for the workshops and specialty meetings as well. I understand that the same thing is true in other specialty areas, such as computing, also.

Now we have to figure out how to get this across to people.

Tina

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 395 From: Kevin Roche Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Tina —

I continue to be astonished and exhilarated by the response our cc26 bid
parties and costume ribbons generate.

The Evil Genius parties have been very effective because they have a fun
hook that brings people into the room. Once they are there, they
discover that costumers can actually be fun socially, and they stick
around and actually get around to asking questions about the con. I
thought it was the free champagne, but we couldn’t afford it at TorCon
and the party was still a huge hit.

With the ribbons, we’ve been spreading the word not only at cons and
costume events, but at drag events, and the response continues to be
strong. Imagine a drag queen in an imperial Russian military-inspired
dress *simpering* because you gave her a ribbon for “taking the time to
dress the part”, thinking for a moment, then saying “That sounds like a
wonderful weekend. I should go!”.

If you can make the connection with something they already love to do,
folks seem to “get it” faster. Especially in the Bay Area, where, alas,
so many people hear “costume guild” and think “stuffy victorian
recreationist”. If you have fun with your marketing, I think your
marketing dollars go a lot further, too.

I knew we were on to something when the FurCon chair sought us out at
BayCon to ask how FC could help our bid.

I’m rambling. I hope there’s a shred or two of coherent stuff in here
that might be of use to y’all.

Kevin

>
> Now we have to figure out how to get this across to people.
>
> Tina
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 396 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

In a message dated 1/7/2004 7:13:18 PM Central Standard Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> You’re moving to Baptistown?

Okay, would someone explain to me this Baptistown thing? I’ve only been doing
this since ’97 and only knows about its existence, but not the whole story.
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 397 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

In a message dated 1/8/2004 4:55:25 PM Central Standard Time,
costumrs@radiks.net writes:

> Whatever we can do to shoot down that misconception is to be pursued.

Hi! My name is Henry. I have been to only three CC’s, I’m still a novice, and
I finally got my own sewing machine last August.

(Or, in other words, feel free to use me as an example of people who got to
CC’s.)
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 398 From: Byron Connell Date: 1/8/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

E-mail it to me and I’ll run copies.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Trudy Leonard
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…

Byron –

I will get those into the mail for you. Any estimate on how many you’d like
me to send?

Thanks,

Trudy

>From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:07:10 -0500
>
>Trudy —
>
>Yes. I’ll be happy to give away a bunch of them.
>
>Byron
>
>
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Trudy Leonard” <georgialei@hotmail.com>
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:03 AM
>Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
>
>
> > Byron –
> >
> > Would you like flyers for CC22?
> >
> > Trudy
> >
> >
> > >From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
> > >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [runacc] More marketing…
> > >Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:46:41 -0500
> > >
> > >On this coast, we’re fortunate that both Arisia and Lunacon normally
>run
> > >full (or at least sizable) costume program tracks, which gives us
>similar
> > >exposure. I will bring CC 26 flyers to both cons and expect to hand
>them
> > >to the masquerade entrants as they check in at the respective green
>rooms.
> > >As the green room manager, I certainly won’t object to such blatant
> > >marketing and I doubt that the MD (Carl Mami) will. (Arisia is this
>month,
> > >in Boston; Lunacon is in March outside New York.)
> > >
> > >I expect to do the same thing at Noreascon 4.
> > >
> > >I also hope to give out many costume award ribbons at the cons. I
>arranged
> > >to have one given to every entrant at the Albacon masquerade last
>October,
> > >plus key masquerade gophers, but I still have a fair number to give
>away.
> > >
> > >At times, however, I wonder why we’re bidding so hard, since we’re
> > >unopposed for CC 26, so far as I know!
> > >
> > >Byron
> > >
> > >
> > >—– Original Message —–
> > > From: Andrew Trembley
> > > To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:25 PM
> > > Subject: [runacc] More marketing…
> > >
> > >
> > > So we were already planning a bid party at FurtherConfusion (end of
> > > this month) when the Fursuit Programming Track coordinator asked us
>if
> > > we wanted to do a panel about Costume-Con. We, of course, said
>”yes.”
> > > It’s a reasonable way to access the folks who don’t do parties and
>also
> > > a good way to build a relationship with the con.
> > >
> > > It’s also an excellent alternative to long hours at a fan table. I
>hate
> > > sitting at fan tables.
> > >
> > > Now I don’t expect every convention to be so ready to hand us a
> > > programming room for a hour for what is essentially an
>advertisement,
> > > but I have a sneaking suspicion that at costume-heavy or
> > > costume-friendly cons (particularly where one knows people in
> > > programming) that it wouldn’t be difficult to get a panel on
>”costuming
> > > year-round” or something the like that covers all sorts of different
> > > local, regional and national/international events that folks doing
> > > costumes at conventions might be interested in.
> > >
> > > andy
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory
offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

——————————————————————————
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 399 From: s_trembley@yahoo.com Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: More marketing…

Baptistown is the legendary epicenter of costuming smofs that has
been compared to the equally elusive Area 51.

To most people, it’s a sedate town in western New Jersey with a post
office that postmarks anonymous fishy letters to the CostumAPA
manually rather than sending them to a USPS distribution center where
they could be mistakenly associated with costumers we actually know.

These mysterious folk sponsored a last minute bid for CC16 through
their only known agent to the outside world, Toni Lay. The very
mention of Baptistown had an odd effect on the established St. Louis
bid and there was a deferral to Baptistown. Perhaps the CC25 group
could elucidate on that historic decision – blackmail, bribery,
favors of some sort … who could say if the secret is ready to be
exposed?

Don’t worry, Henry, there’s been an American Girl Store opened in
Manhatten this past year so you will not have to go without 18 inch
collectible dolls and their fashions if you decide to move east and
decide to undermine someone else’s CC bid. Could it happen to St.
Louis twice???

Sharon
central oceanview NJ, not even remotely close to Baptistown

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, henryosier@c… wrote:
> In a message dated 1/7/2004 7:13:18 PM Central Standard Time,
> bconnel1@n… writes:
> > You’re moving to Baptistown?
> Okay, would someone explain to me this Baptistown thing? I’ve only
been doing
> this since ’97 and only knows about its existence, but not the
whole story.
> Henry
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 400 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 1/12/2004
Subject: Re: Baptistown
Thank you, Sharon!

I still would like to start a new joke bid. More along the lines of Arkham,
Gotham, Metropolis (either one), etc.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 7 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 7 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 301 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 302 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 303 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 304 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 305 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 306 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 307 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 308 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 309 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 310 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 311 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Budgets & Marketing (was Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…)
Group: runacc Message: 312 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Other Marketing/Budget (was Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…)
Group: runacc Message: 313 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/27/2003
Subject: there are days…
Group: runacc Message: 314 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/30/2003
Subject: Bid (marketing) Update…
Group: runacc Message: 315 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/1/2003
Subject: An Announcement from the CC21 Co-Chair
Group: runacc Message: 316 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Canadian Conferences…
Group: runacc Message: 317 From: Elaine Mami Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Re: Canadian Conferences…
Group: runacc Message: 318 From: martingear Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Award Certificates
Group: runacc Message: 319 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/7/2003
Subject: Re: Award Certificates
Group: runacc Message: 320 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/23/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Re: ribbons and certificates
Group: runacc Message: 321 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/23/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Re: ribbons and certificates
Group: runacc Message: 322 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/24/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 323 From: Karen Heim Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 324 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 325 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 326 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/26/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 327 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 328 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 329 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 330 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 331 From: martingear Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 332 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: A stab at the introduction…
Group: runacc Message: 333 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 334 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 335 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…
Group: runacc Message: 336 From: Tina Connell Date: 9/28/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…
Group: runacc Message: 337 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 9/28/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 338 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 339 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 340 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 341 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 342 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 343 From: martingear Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 344 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Group: runacc Message: 345 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…
Group: runacc Message: 346 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 347 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…
Group: runacc Message: 348 From: Marc Gordon Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
Group: runacc Message: 349 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: section 1 outline/draft
Group: runacc Message: 350 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 301 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 10:19 PM, Cliff and Eileen wrote:

> If the amount to be passed forward to future conventions is a budgeted
> amount that a committee tries to meet, there is the possibility that
> at some
> point a convention might have to hold back or even cut spending on
> extras to
> make sure the targeted donations are made.

I would like to differentiate between pledging (promising, announcing,
publicizing, whatever) target donations and budgeting target donations.

If the committee would choose to pledge target donations (and I think
any CC committee would be fools to do so based on historical data) then
yes, the convention might have to cut back on other expenses to meet
that pledge.

If the committee would choose to budget targeted donations (which is
what I’m suggesting) then those target donations would be (in my
opinion at least) the first things that should be cut if something goes
haywire.

Bruce mentioned the issue of “appearing to make a profit.” Last I
looked, a non-profit isn’t denied the right to make a profit in its
operations, it’s just restricted on how that profit can be distributed.
It makes sense to me to plan a small profit (cushion, margin for error,
call it what you wish) into the budget and have plans to distribute it
appropriately. It doesn’t make sense to me to budget to break-even and
have no margin for error.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 302 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

CC22 thinks that passing funds forward is a lovely idea and appreciates
greatly the contribution that CC19 made to us. If we can, we plan to do
something similar, but we would also like to make at least a token
reimbursement to our volunteers, program participants, and staff. (Is that
OK? Anything in the rules that I missed that would prohibit that?)

I suspect that Salt Lake could use the funds since I’m not sure how much
they ended up with from the voting fees, so we do feel an obligation to try
and pass them something.

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…
>Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:25:20 -0400
>
>Hi, folks!
>
>I want to clarify something concerning CCXV’s passthrough funds, sent to
>CCs 16, 17 and 18:
>
>The decision to clean out the bank account at the conclusion of payment
>of everyone was made by the committee, with my primary influence. Our
>sponsor, the GCFCG, provided us with a 501(c)(3) umbrella, but no
>operating funds whatsoever. While a few of the GCFCG members argued that
>we should keep the funds, it was my belief that the funds should be put
>back into Costume-Cons, and since I was hearing that the next few were
>lower in number than ours was, they could probably use the extra cash. I
>was also President of the chapter at the time, and it was finally an
>executive decision made to disperse the funds.
>
>We didn’t have a mandate to do so. I think we received a donation from
>at least one prior CC, which is where I got the idea to do it. I’d have
>to look up the details to know which one gave it to us, but I think it
>was one of the CA CCs. The main thing was, we wanted to zero out our
>bank account.
>
>History Lesson: The GCFCG had a big problem at the time the ICG was
>incorporated (just prior to 1992), because of its original status as the
>founding ICG chapter as well as sponsor of CC3. The con made so much
>extra money, the IRS had a problem believing the chapter was non-profit.
>It took years (and an expensive accountant bill) to straighten out the
>finances as a result.
>
>We didn’t want to cause any questions to happen with the IRS. The con
>pulled in just over 20k over the entire course of its existence, but not
>all in the same year, and we very carefully documented where every penny
>went.
>
>I had hoped to start a tradition, but I don’t know how long it lasted. I
>know that at least CC16 passed on some funds, and I understand that CC19
>did as well. Without the financial records/budgets from the other CCs, I
>don’t know for sure what happened with the rest.
>
>If we do address the subject in the Run a CC document, it should be as
>historic data (what other con coms have done) and not as a requirement.
>We certainly didn’t budget for the funds. I was hoping there would be
>more, but an expensive hotel bill and extra video editing requirements
>put paid to the largest quantity of profits. We were lucky we had the
>extra to pass forward, in the end.
>
>Note: I’m finishing with putting the Summer issue of The ICG Newsletter
>sometime this weekend/early next week. I just finished labeling all the
>envelopes – now have to collate and fold all the copies (some 550 or
>so). When I’m done, I plan to spend time looking at the outline on the
>site with an eye to making the changes we discussed at the meeting at
>CC21. I would really appreciate feedback about this subject in
>particular, so we can get to writing the content. I can write a lot of
>it, but I’m not expecting to write everything!
>
>Hint.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Talk to you soon,
>
>Betsy
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 

Group: runacc Message: 303 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Trudy Leonard wrote:

> CC22 thinks that passing funds forward is a lovely idea and appreciates
> greatly the contribution that CC19 made to us. If we can, we plan to
> do
> something similar, but we would also like to make at least a token
> reimbursement to our volunteers, program participants, and staff. (Is
> that
> OK? Anything in the rules that I missed that would prohibit that?)

Karen has said (unless I interpreted her email wrong) there is nothing
in the Constitution that speaks to distribution of any profit from the
convention.

Personally, if I were you, I would work something into the con budget
to forecast and account for those reimbursements if you wanted to make
sure they happen. Better to have it in the budget and cut it if
necessary than to depend on chance.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 304 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

At 05:03 PM 6/25/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>Karen has said …there is nothing in the Constitution that speaks to
>distribution of any profit from the convention.

This is absolutely correct.

Historically, excess funds have been used for:

Bailout funds for previous CC’s that fell into the red;
Pass-forward funds to future CC’s;
Printing of Memory Books for the attendees of the con that made the profit;
Printing and distribution of photo enlargements for Fashion Show designers
/ constructors / models and Masquerade winners of the con that made the profit;
Extra amenities (food & drink services put out during the day for the con
membership at large) at the con itself;
Reimbursements to con staff, volunteers, lecturers, etc.

I’m sure there are other equally worthy uses, which is why I don’t want to
mandate how any con’s excess funds (if any) should be used.

Trudy, there’s nothing in the rules to tell you what to do with your
profits. Pass-forward funds to other CC’s would be fine, and I’m sure CC-23
could use the $$$.
I’m also sure reimbursements to worthy staff, volunteers, etc. also would
be greatly appreciated. (At CC-6, we made our committee buy memberships so
we would have startup $$$, and then refunded then as soon as we were
assured the con would be in the black.)

Andy, I’m just not sure how to budget a CC for the current economy. If
anything, budget for “worst case” attendance numbers and then do the Happy
Dance when you exceed them. At CC-6, we budgeted for 400, had 500 going in,
and 100 registrations at the door (this is NOT typical for at-the-door
registrations, so don’t use these numbers for your estimates!!!). I think
CC-8 budgeted for 600 (based on CC-6), and had to shut down registration at
900+ because the hotel would not hold any more bodies. On the other hand,
other CC’s have budgeted for reasonable numbers (300), and done their
darndest to get the word out, and ended up with less than stellar
attendance. So the important message here is NOT to overextend. And if you
have to cut budget items, DO NOT CUT advertising.

I would hope that CC-26 would draw at least as well as CC-6, but I just
don’t know. All I can tell y’all is that as far as I know, the
best-attended CC’s ever were in California, but that was during the “boom”
years of Corporate jobs (80’s and early 90’s) and I don’t know if those
numbers are valid any more.

I’d like to see the attendance ?’s filled in on the CC website, but that
info needs to be supplied by the concoms in question.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 305 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
CC19 received donations from CC15, CC16, & CC17 (the CC15 donation was
received after CC16 had occurred.) We passed on donations to CC20, CC21 &
CC22, as well as to a local convention.

We are heading out tomorrow to do the family thing in B.C., so I will be
away from my computer for the next two weeks.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–
From: Betsy Delaney

I had hoped to start a tradition, but I don’t know how long it lasted. I
know that at least CC16 passed on some funds, and I understand that CC19
did as well. Without the financial records/budgets from the other CCs, I
don’t know for sure what happened with the rest.

 

Group: runacc Message: 306 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

Hi!

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Historically, excess funds have been used for:
>
> Bailout funds for previous CC’s that fell into the red;
> Pass-forward funds to future CC’s;
> Printing of Memory Books for the attendees of the con that made the profit;
> Printing and distribution of photo enlargements for Fashion Show designers
> / constructors / models and Masquerade winners of the con that made the profit;
> Extra amenities (food & drink services put out during the day for the con
> membership at large) at the con itself;
> Reimbursements to con staff, volunteers, lecturers, etc.

And this is just the sort of information I think we should include in
the final document, for reference.

> I’m also sure reimbursements to worthy staff, volunteers, etc. also would
> be greatly appreciated. (At CC-6, we made our committee buy memberships so
> we would have startup $$$, and then refunded then as soon as we were
> assured the con would be in the black.)

We did this only after we were sure all of our bills were covered. We
were able to refund all staff who wished to receive refunds. Several
chose to make donations of their money, and that was part of what we
passed on to the next three CCs. It took over a year to straighten out
everything and pay for everything. The hotel bill in particular was in
dispute for well over four months after the conclusion of the con, and
video needed extra time as well (almost a year, by my hazy reconing).

The biggest thing to remember – you can’t close the books until you are
dead sure there are no more bills to be paid, and that can take a
considerable amount of time post-con.

Even with our budget, which was set up with three breaks (200 members,
300 members and 400 members), and with careful tracking of
income/expenditure, what our budget doesn’t show is that we modified the
numbers during the process – sometimes more than once a week as we got
close to the event – the numbers shown in the version that’s online
really doesn’t reflect the changes we made over the course of time.

It was really clear, as we crossed a deadline (raise in fees, calendar
timeline) that some of the numbers were going to shift from changeable
to fixed. We broke our numbers down into finer detail than some might
have wanted, but we knew exactly what we could afford to pay for as a
result.

We treated our budget much more like a guideline than a fixed
requirement. We simply had to be flexible. If we needed more for tech or
the con suite at the last minute, that money was going to have to come
from somewhere else.

We did have a larger than usual number of walk-ins at the last minute.
We also had some found income by offering event-only donations to family
members and Disclave members who wanted to see a masquerade but who
weren’t interested in attending the panels.

> I’d like to see the attendance ?’s filled in on the CC website, but that
> info needs to be supplied by the concoms in question.

Actually, so would I. I think I’ve asked for the data before from some
of the different chairs, but some were much easier to talk to than
others. And there are some for which I don’t think we’ll ever have
complete information.

It would be a GOOD THING(tm) to get at least the current and most recent
CCs to give us those numbers when they’re done.

And frankly, personally, I’d love to see the Whole Costumers’ Catalog
budgeted for in one of the upcoming CCs. It’s a benefit that disappeared
with CC18, but it’s a valuable resource that (if Karen actually has the
time to resurrect) all the members of the con would certainly
appreciate. Memory books are nice to have, but having that resource
guide available has been a lifesaver on several occasions.

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 307 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

In a message dated 6/25/2003 7:08:36 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> Personally, if I were you, I would work something into the con budget
> to forecast and account for those reimbursements if you wanted to make
> sure they happen. Better to have it in the budget and cut it if
> necessary than to depend on chance.

Andy,
Putting something like that into a budget can be a real hard thing to
do. CC21 did make money, which was a huge weight of relief for me. You might
remember another con in this part of the universe in the mid 90’s. It’s first
year it did alright. So much so that it gave the ConCom, me included, visions
of grandeur. The second year was just the opposite, due to bad weather. The
ConCom had to pay con bills out of our pockets.
At best, I’d advise a 50/75/100% system. I am still trying to figure
out which end of that the next CC should be on. In my opinion, and
experience, it is nicer to have a big chunk of money early on.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 308 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

At 11:09 AM 6/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>And this is just the sort of information I think we should include in
>the final document, for reference.

Absolutely.

>The biggest thing to remember – you can’t close the books until you are
>dead sure there are no more bills to be paid, and that can take a
>considerable amount of time post-con.

Many CC’s have left their books open for at least a year after the con.

>And frankly, personally, I’d love to see the Whole Costumers’ Catalog
>budgeted for in one of the upcoming CCs. It’s a benefit that disappeared
>with CC18, but it’s a valuable resource that (if Karen actually has the
>time to resurrect) all the members of the con would certainly
>appreciate. Memory books are nice to have, but having that resource
>guide available has been a lifesaver on several occasions.

I am willing to do a WCC again in conjunction with a CC.

However, that being said, the decision to do a WCC or not needs to be made
at least two years out from the convention, and preferably the moment a
convention wins its CC bid.

First, I need “advance warning” so I have time to get the manuscript
together. Doing a WCC is a very time and labor intensive undertaking, which
is why there hasn’t been one in so long.

Second, and most importantly, the price of the book needs to be amortized
into the membership fees FROM THE START, or the convention simply can’t
afford the cost of the book on top of its other expenses. [CC’s receive
discount pricing on the book (at least 50% off retail).] I’m sure members
would be happy to pay an additional $10 in membership fees if they are
receiving a $20 reference book as part of their overall convention package.

Third, I will not do a new WCC for two consecutive CC’s, as it is too
exhausting.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 309 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Utah bid three years in a row, and won on the third try, in Australia. I don’t think we got any money from that vote. But since we did help push up the voting count in our first two bids, Atlanta has already seen that we could use some money and sent us $50. Which is very nice, since right now they are on the low end of their income balance. Thanks.

We were very concerned early on in our bid/hotel selection with CC attendance. Early information would have had us expecting too high a turn-out. (we can still hope…) But after getting more detailed information (attendee count and location), we suspect that our local area can figure on about 250. Unless we get lots of West Coast attendance (we do hope) We do have lots of hotel and masquerade space. But it was a challenge to find a hotel with lots of space, and still have less than 200 rooms per night expected.

In our license bylaws, we specifically state what information we will report to the license holders. So that info will be availabe to future bids. I expect this group to help draft such guidelines for future CCs. For us (who did not know a lot about CC, it was very important information.) Also, our bylaws state that our extra profits go to the next three CCs. This does not mean that we can’t also offer some refund to staff, but that I did see the importance of seed money for CC.
Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Trudy Leonard <georgialei@hotmail.com>

I suspect that Salt Lake could use the funds since I’m not sure how much
they ended up with from the voting fees, so we do feel an obligation to try
and pass them something.

Trudy

.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 310 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

>From: “Charles Galway” <cgalway@xmission.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…
>
>Utah bid three years in a row, and won on the third try, in Australia. I
>don’t think we got any money from that vote. But since we did help push up
>the voting count in our first two bids, Atlanta has already seen that we
>could use some money and sent us $50. Which is very nice, since right now
>they are on the low end of their income balance. Thanks.

Charles –

Since none of us could attend the Australian Con, we just sent you what our
usual contingent would have spent in voting fees, had we been able to vote.
We hope to have more for you later.

Contact me off list and let me know if you want to advertise in one of the
PR’s or the Program book.
The next PR will have at least a list of upcoming CC’s. I realized too late
that I had left them out of the most recent one.

Trudy

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 311 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Budgets & Marketing (was Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…)

On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 08:19 AM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/25/2003 7:08:36 PM Central Daylight Time,
> attrembl@bovil.com writes:
>> Personally, if I were you, I would work something into the con budget
>> to forecast and account for those reimbursements if you wanted to make
>> sure they happen. Better to have it in the budget and cut it if
>> necessary than to depend on chance.
> Andy,
> Putting something like that into a budget can be a real hard
> thing to
> do. CC21 did make money, which was a huge weight of relief for me. You
> might
> remember another con in this part of the universe in the mid 90’s.
> It’s first
> year it did alright. So much so that it gave the ConCom, me included,
> visions
> of grandeur.

Oh, yeah, I remember that con. 40 below. I also remember a committee
member or two (not present here or involved in CC) who screwed around
with things. That didn’t hurt the con’s bottom line, but may have
prevented the con from happening again regardless.

And yeah, it can be difficult to budget reimbursements in, particularly
if it’s not done very early. Betsy is right, early budgets are really
just guesses; they don’t solidify entirely until right before or
sometimes after the con. Karen’s right, large-ticket items like the
Whole Costumers’ Catalog need to be included in those early budgets.
Early budgets may be guesses, but they’ve got to include everything
because they’re the only tool for setting membership rates at a level
that will pay for the con.

Karen is also dead-on about advertising and marketing.

Last year the LA WesterCon was only about 1000 people. Insane? Yes.
Ridiculous? Yes. It should have been twice that size. But they did an
atrocious job marketing the convention. They didn’t have a marketing
person until 6 months before the con. They’re lucky they broke 600.

For the last three years Kevin and I have worked on a 400-600 person
BDSM conference that drew membership from all over the country. It sold
out (hit membership cap and went over) every year in spite of craziness
and stupidity within the committee (worse than in the convention you
didn’t name). We’ve recruited the same marketing person for our CC bid.

Right now we’re covering our marketing out of personal funds (what with
not being incorporated or having a revenue stream) but that’s what I
figure we’ve got to do. We need momentum, both locally and
internationally. We really want to get folks to Utah (or at least get
folks to buy supporting memberships) so they can vote for us. Votes may
be a hit on our bottom line (particularly if the voting fee doesn’t
cover all the expenses associated with a supporting membership), but
they’re a sign of commitment on the part of members.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 312 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/26/2003
Subject: Other Marketing/Budget (was Re: [runacc] pass-forward funds…)

On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 10:10 AM, Charles Galway wrote:

> But after getting more detailed information (attendee count and
> location), we suspect that our local area can figure on about 250.
> Unless we get lots of West Coast attendance (we do hope)

We hope too 🙂

For that to happen, though, you need to market out here. In the 18
months leading up to your con, we’re going to need to see you and your
folks out on the coast, and in Arizona. Colorado, St. Louis and Iowa
(and maybe as far east as Chicago) may be fertile turf for you too (tho
Chicago to Salt Lake is about a 2 day drive).

We’re starting to work on a master list of costume organizations in our
marketing sphere. When it’s better fleshed out (right now I’ve got a
few college theater and art departments and local orgs) I’ll make sure
you get access to it.

Just a suggestion: Look up your local drag court. If you don’t mind
hanging out with drag queens who drink a lot, your local coronations
and events should be a great place to market. There’s an imperial court
both in Salt Lake and in Ogden.

Ogden’s Coronation ball is in November, and this year’s theme is “An
Evening of Movies, Movie Stars and Awards From Harlow to Streisand”
http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/ogden.html
Don’t know much about this; your court is fairly new, this is the
fourth coronation in Ogden.

Salt Lake City’s Coronation ball is Memorial Day Weekend, and next
year’s theme is “Namaste: An Evening in the Majestic Ruins of the
Maharaja”
http://www.impcourt.org/icis/chapters/saltlake.html
Salt Lake Coronation is huge and draws folks from all over the country.
It’s got the reputation of being a great and rowdy party. We’ve got
friends here who attend every year. If you’re interested in following
up these opportunities, we’ll talk.

> In our license bylaws, we specifically state what information we
> will report to the license holders. So that info will be available to
> future bids. I expect this group to help draft such guidelines for
> future CCs.

I would like to see a standard reporting format suggested in the guide
even if it’s not required by the constitution. I think that would
benefit the archives and upcoming conventions and bids.

> For us (who did not know a lot about CC, it was very important
> information.) Also, our bylaws state that our extra profits go to the
> next three CCs. This does not mean that we can’t also offer some
> refund to staff, but that I did see the importance of seed money for
> CC.

Oh, that’s easy. Membership refunds are expenses and are subtracted
from the gross.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 313 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/27/2003
Subject: there are days…
…when I really get reminded what a good marketing person is, and why
we picked the one we’ve got.

We’re cleaning up and getting ready for dinner (Lance has dinner with
us every Wednesday) and he says “you know, the only place I don’t have
fliers is in my saddlebags on the bike. By the way, do you have any
quarter-page fliers?”

I haven’t the foggiest how I spaced quarter-page fliers. Probably
because everybody does full-page fliers at cons. It’s not like we don’t
do quarter-pages for all sorts of other events.

The other thing is the Quilt Museum (2 blocks from work) is part of a
quilter’s “shop hop” this weekend so they’ve got representatives out
drumming up business and greeting folks. I’m going to print proofs of
our marketing packet and take them over to them.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 314 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/30/2003
Subject: Bid (marketing) Update…
So along with this weekend’s plans to do a party at Westercon, I’ve
been working on some of our marketing docs…

Lance and I were talking at dinner last week, he said we needed a
quarter-page flier. I’ve crunched two fliers down to quarter-page size
and also created two new quarter-page fliers to fill out the layout.
The current flier pack can be downloaded from the group file section at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cc26sv-staff/files/
It’s a pretty big download at 4.5mb, but it’s also 12 pages of text and
artwork. The 4-ups are page 12.

We’re planning to run out the current batch of ribbons at Westercon and
afterwards order a new batch that’s more graphically consistent (namely
in fonts used) with the paper fliers. They’re also going to read
“Pre-con Costume Award” rather than “Pre-con Hall Costume Award” so
they’re more versatile. If you’ve been patiently awaiting a ribbon
refresh, this is why we haven’t sent them yet (namely, we had to
survive June).

Kevin has done a new set of “ask me about CC26?” badge hangers. These
are again more consistent with the paper fliers, and (as tested at
BayCon) much more visible and likely to attract attention. We’ll be
distributing these when we run into folks. It’s a good idea to carry a
pack of quarter-page fliers with you when wearing this badge… lots of
folks do ask about it.

Another thing we’re planning for the 4-up fliers is to stake out the
door for the contestant meeting and hand fliers to folks as contestants
arrive. We’re also looking for folks to help us canvas the masquerade
line Saturday evening and hand out award ribbons (assuming we still
have some) and 4-up fliers to folks who are interested.

I’ve been adding to the marketing database
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cc26sv-staff/database
It now includes local SCA chapters with contact information on the web
and local Imperial Court chapters. The SCA chapters don’t have USnail
addresses; they don’t seem to post any of this on their websites. If
you have groups who you think ought to be on the list, please add them.

I’m going to get back to work on the calendar. Please add calendar
entries for events you believe are of interest to the bid. Set a 2-week
and 1-day reminder if you do.

You’ve probably recently received a “profile request” from Yahoo that I
sent. This is part of what I’m doing to keep track of whether folks do
or don’t know how to sign in to the web services of the group. Please
do a profile (even if it’s not too detailed… don’t want to give away
too much to the marketers).

Speaking of marketers (and not the good kind) when you sign in to do
your profile, also check your account information (it’s the “account
info” link in the group title bar). It’s nice to have real names
associated, but it’s also useful to go in and click on the “edit your
marketing preferences.” By default Yahoo assumes you want to give away
all your information, so go in and switch that off.

Finally, I’d appreciate it if you would update your entry in either the
bid committee database or the conference committee database.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 315 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 7/1/2003
Subject: An Announcement from the CC21 Co-Chair
This is to inform everyone that, at this time, I have no plans to bid on
another Costume Con. This is not due to CC21 being an utterly terrible experience,
or anything like that. I have made this decision because I do not know what
my life will be like in six or seven years. It would be unfair to the costumers
in the Chicago &Milwaukee areas if I were to bid on another that far out, and
then to have my life have me move out of the area.

Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21
<A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes You!</A>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 316 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Canadian Conferences…
So the whole WorldCon (Toronto) customs & immigration debate going on
over on ICG-D had me thinking, and had Kevin digging things up on the
web.

Turns out there is a whole booklet from the Canadian government
concerned with bringing international conferences to Canada. It covers:
Immigration
Customs
Taxes (besides import duties)
Work permits

Read it at http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/cp/rc4032/README.html

Canada is very serious about attracting international conferences and
making it easy for organizers/delegates/members/participants to get the
information they need to cross the border. I’m wondering if the US
government has anything documents like this. If nothing else, it’s a
valuable resource to identify the kinds of things we should research to
help our foreign members enter the US for CC’s here.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 317 From: Elaine Mami Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Re: Canadian Conferences…

That’s an excellent idea!

Elaine

> So the whole WorldCon (Toronto) customs & immigration debate going on
> over on ICG-D had me thinking, and had Kevin digging things up on the
> web.
>
> Turns out there is a whole booklet from the Canadian government
> concerned with bringing international conferences to Canada. It covers:
> Immigration
> Customs
> Taxes (besides import duties)
> Work permits
>
> Read it at http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/cp/rc4032/README.html
>
> Canada is very serious about attracting international conferences and
> making it easy for organizers/delegates/members/participants to get the
> information they need to cross the border. I’m wondering if the US
> government has anything documents like this. If nothing else, it’s a
> valuable resource to identify the kinds of things we should research to
> help our foreign members enter the US for CC’s here.

 

Group: runacc Message: 318 From: martingear Date: 8/6/2003
Subject: Award Certificates
Andy –
Where the hell are the award certificates from CC21? Don’t pull an
“Animal” on us!

Marty

 

Group: runacc Message: 319 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/7/2003
Subject: Re: Award Certificates

On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 03:07 PM, martingear wrote:

> Andy –
> Where the hell are the award certificates from CC21? Don’t pull an
> “Animal” on us!

I’ll give you the same answer publicly that I gave the short list of
folks who asked privately:

I’ve got the paper stock, I’ve got the stamps and envelopes, I’ve got
the
data, I’ve got the design, I’ve got the signatures, now all I need is
time.

It’s currently in the “my fault” zone, and has been since mid-June
(when I received the last thing I needed from others).


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 320 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/23/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Re: ribbons and certificates

On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 05:57 AM, rookwoods wrote:

> — In ICG-D@yahoogroups.com, Lisa A Ashton <lisa58@j…> wrote:
>> What I do, as soon as I return home from the con (if not sooner) is to
>> write on the back of the ribbons in ink, what it won, the date and
>> what
>> con (which is sometimes not printed on the front ribbon).
>
> I’ve tried to do that with my ribbons as well, but again: I didn’t
> always “hear” what I won, so I”m not sure if I wrote correctly on the
> ribbon – I keep figuring that I’ll get the actually working on the
> certificate.
>
> But what do you do for wins at a con that did not hand out ribbons?
> recent example: this year’s CC. Lovely etched glasses if you won Best
> in Something, but no ribbons for anyone. (I’m not trying to pick on
> this year’s CC, it’s just the most recent. I understand that other CCs
> and other cons haven’t handed out ribbons as well).

‘k, so now that mine are mailed I’m going to talk…

First of all, there is a group (somewhat inactive, probably in need of
a kick in the pants) working on a “Costume-Con Runner’s Handbook” which
will include checklists for masquerade runners. Much of the masquerade
section, I’m sure, is going to be based on the Kennedy Compendium and
JW-A/Devereaux. This handbook will be available (I believe) on the
costume-con website once it’s in a draft that is presentable.

as to the meat:

Ribbons are nice. They’re also a tricky item to budget and order. It’s
really bad to under-order ribbons and have some winners go without.
It’s really difficult to estimate the number of ribbons actually needed
even when there’s a high level of preregistration. Unless you’re really
lucky the only safe bet is to over-order, and considering how tight
most CC budgets are, that’s not a good choice. I love ribbons (which is
why we’re giving them out to promote CC26?) but in certain budget or
planning situations they may not be feasible.

Home-crafted prizes can be cool, just look at the CC16 medallions (even
with the cure issues), but may not be any more cost-effective than
ordering ribbons in, and are going to be just as difficult to estimate.
Time is also an issue there.

As to how to tag the “special” prizes, a sticker on the underside of
the foot of the glass or on the back of the plaque is often a good
solution for an item like that.

Calligraphed certificates are insane. Printed certificates can be very
nice.

So on to “What I learned from CC21:”

We’ve both got laptops; copies of everything for the masquerade will be
on both of them.

I’m buying a portable printer this weekend. Canon i70, if you care.
Good print speed, sturdier and smaller than the average desktop inkjet
printer. The main reason is to be able to print party posters at cons,
but it’s also useful to have for printing certificates, obviously.

I’m buying a portable scanner too. Probably the Ambir Travelscan Pro
(maybe Ambir Visigo A4 or A6). Very important for scanning judge’s
signatures for certificates (so the judges don’t get tendonitis signing
tons of certificates). I will get judges’ signatures early in the
weekend, too.

I will have a database or spreadsheet set up to transcribe entry sheets
right away instead of working from paper packets that have to be
heavily manipulated.

All entrant forms will be printed from the database and reviewed with
the contestants instead of using handwritten forms for the tech crew.

Certificates will be designed before the convention and the merge
process will be tested.

Certificate paper will be chosen before the convention. Generic 20lb
bond just doesn’t make for nice certificates. High-brightness 47lb
stock is fabulous.

I think that covers everything.

For the moment, at least.

Kevin and I are running the Masquerade for ConJecture 2003 (a little
convention in San Diego, 10/3-5) and I’m starting on the certificates
for that now. Got a request in to the con to identify the fonts they’re
using in pubs and for a copy of the logo in hi-res format. Could
probably use the same spreadsheet and merge, but may want to work up
something different. Rules are done. Best guess is about 10 entrants at
most.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 321 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/23/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Re: ribbons and certificates

At 04:58 PM 9/23/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>Calligraphed certificates are insane. Printed certificates can be very
>nice.

Printed certificates definitely seem like the way to go.

The ribbons are really cool to wear on your belt with your street clothes
like scalps on the day after the competition at the convention, but they
become a storage problem once they go home.

And some folks don’t like the ribbons because they look like the same ones
handed out to the 4-H livestock at the county fair.

Other “special” prizes are greatly appreciated, but should be in addition
to the certificate.

Sounds like you have the certificate situation well under control for
future masquerades that you and Kevin run. 🙂

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 322 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/24/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 01:39 PM, Alix Jordan wrote:

> Gentlebeings:
>
> Properly, from the dollmakers perspective, CostumeCon does not
> have a
> doll competition. In a doll competition the entire doll counts; how
> you
> made it; what you made it from; how you present it. Judging at a doll
> show
> is like presenting a costume at a masquerade…everything counts. And
> you
> can’t buy the doll, just as you can’t buy a costume. You need to
> start from
> scratch, and you aren’t allowed to adapt a commercial pattern unless
> the
> competiton rules allow it and that is only done for rank beginners and
> to be
> honest, I’ve only seen it listed once. And at a competition clothing
> is
> secondary, unless the competion rules declare that all dolls must be
> wearing
> clothing. (Big scandal one year when one of the American competitions
> disqualified an accurate reproduction of a Native American
> woman…because
> it did not have underwear!) There have been some very big prize
> winners in
> doll competitions that have been nudes. (Check out “Anatomy of a
> Doll” by
> Susan Oroyon.)
> On the other hand, the competions at CostumeCon emphasis the
> costume
> over the doll. While you can make a doll from scratch and enter it, a
> person who goes out, buys a Barbie doll and makes a costume to fit the
> doll;
> adapting doll patterns; has an equal chance of winning.

I don’t know if this is reflected in the rules, but doll contest awards
are often segregated by “scratch-made doll” and “costumed commercial
doll” awards.

They aren’t necessarily judged, though, by doll specialists.

Both are things for future committees and the RunACC group to consider


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 323 From: Karen Heim Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Andrew Trembley wrote:

>
> I don’t know if this is reflected in the rules, but doll contest awards
> are often segregated by “scratch-made doll” and “costumed commercial
> doll” awards.
>

If it’s a scratch-made doll, then it’s judged there. Does it get fewer
points because it doesn’t have clothes? Possibly, but not necessarily,
depending on the quality of the construction. Are clothes required? I
wouldn’t think so.

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 324 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

At 06:05 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:

>I don’t know if this is reflected in the rules, but doll contest awards
>are often segregated by “scratch-made doll” and “costumed commercial
>doll” awards.
>
>They aren’t necessarily judged, though, by doll specialists.
>
>Both are things for future committees and the RunACC group to consider

While Alix’s comments are undoubtedly accurate, I don’t think we should
promote changing the basic form of our doll competitions. All competitions
at Costume-Cons, regardless of their form or other emphasis, should be
solidly biased to the costume. That is the purpose of the convention and I
don’t think we should bow to the Doll Associations any more than school
theater competitions should bow to our emphases when being judged.

Pierre

>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
>hand
>Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 325 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/25/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Pierre, I agree completely.

Costume-Con should be more about what the doll is wearing than about the
doll (or stuffed animal) itself.

Betsy, can you scan through the ConStitution and make sure any references
to “doll competition” read “doll _costume_ competition” so we can further
clarify this?

Thanks,

–Karen

At 03:50 PM 9/25/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>At 06:05 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:
>
>
> >I don’t know if this is reflected in the rules, but doll contest awards
> >are often segregated by “scratch-made doll” and “costumed commercial
> >doll” awards.
> >
> >They aren’t necessarily judged, though, by doll specialists.
> >
> >Both are things for future committees and the RunACC group to consider
>
>
>While Alix’s comments are undoubtedly accurate, I don’t think we should
>promote changing the basic form of our doll competitions. All competitions
>at Costume-Cons, regardless of their form or other emphasis, should be
>solidly biased to the costume. That is the purpose of the convention and I
>don’t think we should bow to the Doll Associations any more than school
>theater competitions should bow to our emphases when being judged.
>
>Pierre
>
>
> >–
> >andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> >San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> >(Kevin’s)
> > “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> > –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
> >
> >2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
> >hand
> >Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
>
>”Those Who Fail To Learn History
>Are Doomed To Repeat It;
>Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
>Why They Are Simply Doomed.”
>
>Achemdro’hm
>”The Illusion of Historical Fact”
>– C.Y. 4971
>
>Andromeda
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 326 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/26/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Will do!

And it seems to me that the rules posting should probably be the next
big project after I get the photos done.

I am really serious when I say that I could use the help in processing
the information for posting. With three months to go before delivery,
and a TON of stuff going on here, I’m finding that my time is becoming
more and more limited for working on the site and the big projects. The
fall is generally my worst time, schedule-wise: Three birthdays, two
major holidays, and last minute wrap up of work stuff before December
are all contributing to the situation. And I am presently scheduled to
deliver January 2 – subject to continued good progress in the pregnancy,
of course!

I’d be more than happy to see other people on this list volunteer to
take over particular projects – Management of the Run a CC doc comes
instantly to mind. Just because it’s on the web site I manage doesn’t
mean that I feel it’s absolutely necessary for me to personally manage
the entire process!

I’ve posted what we have so far, and have received virtually no feedback
whatsoever to any of the stuff I’ve posted. I know WorldCon interfered
with schedules and free time, but I’m not sure where we’re going if I
don’t hear back from people who’ve promised to do work.

Hint…

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Pierre, I agree completely.
>
> Costume-Con should be more about what the doll is wearing than about
> the
> doll (or stuffed animal) itself.
>
> Betsy, can you scan through the ConStitution and make sure any
> references
> to “doll competition” read “doll _costume_ competition” so we can
> further
> clarify this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> –Karen
>
> At 03:50 PM 9/25/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >At 06:05 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >I don’t know if this is reflected in the rules, but doll contest
> awards
> > >are often segregated by “scratch-made doll” and “costumed
> commercial
> > >doll” awards.
> > >
> > >They aren’t necessarily judged, though, by doll specialists.
> > >
> > >Both are things for future committees and the RunACC group to
> consider
> >
> >
> >While Alix’s comments are undoubtedly accurate, I don’t think we
> should
> >promote changing the basic form of our doll competitions. All
> competitions
> >at Costume-Cons, regardless of their form or other emphasis, should
> be
> >solidly biased to the costume. That is the purpose of the convention
> and I
> >don’t think we should bow to the Doll Associations any more than
> school
> >theater competitions should bow to our emphases when being judged.
> >
> >Pierre
> >
> >
> > >–
> > >andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> > >San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> > >(Kevin’s)
> > > “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> > > –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
> > >
> > >2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my
> right
> > >hand
> > >Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet
> >
> >”Those Who Fail To Learn History
> >Are Doomed To Repeat It;
> >Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
> >Why They Are Simply Doomed.”
> >
> >Achemdro’hm
> >”The Illusion of Historical Fact”
> >– C.Y. 4971
> >
> >Andromeda
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> [click here]
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 327 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Hi, Karen!

Ok, here’s the deal:

[snip]

1.4 Conference Activities

Each Costume-Con conference is required to have the following program
items: (a) at
least one (1) staged costume competition of some sort; (b) at least ten
(10)
instructional/educational presentations of some sort (which can take the
form of
lectures, panel discussions, seminars, hands-on workshops, etc.); (c)
Site Selection
voting for a future Costume-Con conference (see Article 2); and (d) at
least two hours
and a meeting area provided for the Annual Meeting of the International
Costumers’
Guild (as dictated by their By-laws).

Traditional conference activities include: (a) a Social (party) on the
first night of the
conference; (b) a Science-Fiction/Fantasy costume competition; (c) a
Historical
costume competition; (d) a Fashion Design contest (held before the
conference); and
(e) a Fashion Show featuring some of the winning designs from the
Fashion Design
contest.

[snip]

This is the *only* mention that there are competitions at Costume-Con at
all. The Doll Competition/Contest is not addressed. We could:

a. leave this section as is, and leave it up to the committees to
determine what their competitions should be
b. provide a list of “Other/Additional/Alternative Conference
Activities” (competitions held in the past as a suggestion of additional
activities)
c. add the Doll Costume Competition to the second paragraph as (f),
since it has become a tradition. (I don’t think we’ve missed it more
than a year or two since Animal started them (at CC5?))

I’m easy either way, but as soon as we make the decision to amend the
ConStitution, I want to post the change to the list so that we don’t
have any more discussion on that particular topic. Alix is WAAAAYYY too
rabid on the subject.

I’ll be gone all weekend – just trying to tie up some loose ends before
I leave – so I can take care of whatever changes are necessary on
Monday.

Thanks!!!

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Betsy, can you scan through the ConStitution and make sure any references
> to “doll competition” read “doll _costume_ competition” so we can further
> clarify this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> –Karen


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 328 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Any of your suggestions work from my point of view but I kind of like the
inclusiveness of suggestion b:

> b. provide a list of “Other/Additional/Alternative Conference
> Activities” (competitions held in the past as a suggestion of additional
> activities)

It could serve as a guide of what is possible within the CC framework while
demonstrating its flexibility.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 329 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

My first thought is (a). My second thought is (b).

The Doll Costume Competition has never been mandatory at CC, so if it’s not
mentioned in the ConStitution, it shouldn’t be. I thought, if anything, it
might be mentioned as an example of other sorts of possible competitions.

The Single Pattern Competition has taken place at a lot of CC’s, but it
isn’t mandatory, either.

I really want to leave individual committees room to maneuver once they
have covered the Big Four (Social, F&S/F, Historical, Fashion Show) events
at the con. Some committees may not have the time/space/energy/personnel to
deal with a doll costume competition, or they may want to try some other
sort of competition that has not been tried before (such as Iron Costumer).

I just wanted the language about the Doll Costume Competition cleaned up if
it was mentioned by name anywhere in the ConStitution. I guess that isn’t
necessary if it isn’t mentioned, although current and future CC committees
should strongly consider referring to it as the “Doll COSTUME Competition.”

I agree that Alix is out of hand on the ICG list. I tried shutting her up
with the message about “CC is about the costumes, not the dolls,” but she
seems to have tuned that right out. Gak.

–Karen

At 07:11 AM 9/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Hi, Karen!
>
>Ok, here’s the deal:
>
>[snip]
>
>1.4 Conference Activities
>
>Each Costume-Con conference is required to have the following program
>items: (a) at
>least one (1) staged costume competition of some sort; (b) at least ten
>(10)
>instructional/educational presentations of some sort (which can take the
>form of
>lectures, panel discussions, seminars, hands-on workshops, etc.); (c)
>Site Selection
>voting for a future Costume-Con conference (see Article 2); and (d) at
>least two hours
>and a meeting area provided for the Annual Meeting of the International
>Costumers’
>Guild (as dictated by their By-laws).
>
>Traditional conference activities include: (a) a Social (party) on the
>first night of the
>conference; (b) a Science-Fiction/Fantasy costume competition; (c) a
>Historical
>costume competition; (d) a Fashion Design contest (held before the
>conference); and
>(e) a Fashion Show featuring some of the winning designs from the
>Fashion Design
>contest.
>
>[snip]
>
>This is the *only* mention that there are competitions at Costume-Con at
>all. The Doll Competition/Contest is not addressed. We could:
>
> a. leave this section as is, and leave it up to the committees to
>determine what their competitions should be
> b. provide a list of “Other/Additional/Alternative Conference
>Activities” (competitions held in the past as a suggestion of additional
>activities)
> c. add the Doll Costume Competition to the second paragraph as (f),
>since it has become a tradition. (I don’t think we’ve missed it more
>than a year or two since Animal started them (at CC5?))
>
>I’m easy either way, but as soon as we make the decision to amend the
>ConStitution, I want to post the change to the list so that we don’t
>have any more discussion on that particular topic. Alix is WAAAAYYY too
>rabid on the subject.
>
>I’ll be gone all weekend – just trying to tie up some loose ends before
>I leave – so I can take care of whatever changes are necessary on
>Monday.
>
>Thanks!!!
>
>Betsy
>
>Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
> >
> > Betsy, can you scan through the ConStitution and make sure any references
> > to “doll competition” read “doll _costume_ competition” so we can further
> > clarify this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > –Karen
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 330 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

I’m starting to lean toward (b) myself. Anybody else care to give an opinion?

As long as it’s a list of possible activities and none of them are
mandatory, I’m OK with it.

–Karen

At 07:40 AM 9/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>Any of your suggestions work from my point of view but I kind of like the
>inclusiveness of suggestion b:
> > b. provide a list of “Other/Additional/Alternative Conference
> > Activities” (competitions held in the past as a suggestion of additional
> > activities)
>It could serve as a guide of what is possible within the CC framework while
>demonstrating its flexibility.
>
>Nora
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 331 From: martingear Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
Competition”.

Marty

>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 332 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: A stab at the introduction…
‘k, I went back to Betsy’s outline document from back in may:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/message/100

Thoughts & Opinions?

—–
Costume-Con is an artistic endeavour.

Costume-Con is a business endeavour.

Both are true. To be a successful artistic endeavour for its members,
Costume-Con must be a smooth-running business operation behind the scenes.

That’s why this handbook exists. Our goal is to provide conference
committees with advice, resources, checklists and timelines to better
organize, bid and run a Costume-Con.

The handbook is organized in three major sections.

Section 1 is an introduction to Costume-Con; a review of the official
operating documents and obligations that a conference committee must meet.

Section 2 looks at the organization of the conference, both from the
perspective of the events that happen and the jobs and people required
to make those events happen.

Section 3 is a very rough timeline. It breaks out conference planning
into the following phases:
I. Preparing to bid
II. Bidding
III. Frome vote to conference…
IV. Conference Operations (at-con)
V. Closing (post-con)
…and lists which responsibilities fall due during those times.

 

Group: runacc Message: 333 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: worldcon fallout…
So this has nothing to do with TorCon reviews.

Something interesting came out of the business meeting.

The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years to
2 years. This will not take effect unless the ammendment is ratified at
Noreascon 4.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 334 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

This is Karen’s call, but I don’t see a need to add to the required activities and thereby constrain a concom, which might not have a viable doll costume competition one year. In comparison, the WSFS constitution requires only that the concom host the business meeting and award the Hugos. All other activities are at the concom’s discretion.

Leave it the way it is, for now, if my advice.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

Hi, Karen!

Ok, here’s the deal:

[snip]

1.4 Conference Activities

Each Costume-Con conference is required to have the following program
items: (a) at
least one (1) staged costume competition of some sort; (b) at least ten
(10)
instructional/educational presentations of some sort (which can take the
form of
lectures, panel discussions, seminars, hands-on workshops, etc.); (c)
Site Selection
voting for a future Costume-Con conference (see Article 2); and (d) at
least two hours
and a meeting area provided for the Annual Meeting of the International
Costumers’
Guild (as dictated by their By-laws).

Traditional conference activities include: (a) a Social (party) on the
first night of the
conference; (b) a Science-Fiction/Fantasy costume competition; (c) a
Historical
costume competition; (d) a Fashion Design contest (held before the
conference); and
(e) a Fashion Show featuring some of the winning designs from the
Fashion Design
contest.

[snip]

This is the *only* mention that there are competitions at Costume-Con at
all. The Doll Competition/Contest is not addressed. We could:

a. leave this section as is, and leave it up to the committees to
determine what their competitions should be
b. provide a list of “Other/Additional/Alternative Conference
Activities” (competitions held in the past as a suggestion of additional
activities)
c. add the Doll Costume Competition to the second paragraph as (f),
since it has become a tradition. (I don’t think we’ve missed it more
than a year or two since Animal started them (at CC5?))

I’m easy either way, but as soon as we make the decision to amend the
ConStitution, I want to post the change to the list so that we don’t
have any more discussion on that particular topic. Alix is WAAAAYYY too
rabid on the subject.

I’ll be gone all weekend – just trying to tie up some loose ends before
I leave – so I can take care of whatever changes are necessary on
Monday.

Thanks!!!

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> Betsy, can you scan through the ConStitution and make sure any references
> to “doll competition” read “doll _costume_ competition” so we can further
> clarify this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> –Karen


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 335 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…

Andy —

Nice intro.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: [runacc] A stab at the introduction…

‘k, I went back to Betsy’s outline document from back in may:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/message/100

Thoughts & Opinions?

—–
Costume-Con is an artistic endeavour.

Costume-Con is a business endeavour.

Both are true. To be a successful artistic endeavour for its members,
Costume-Con must be a smooth-running business operation behind the scenes.

That’s why this handbook exists. Our goal is to provide conference
committees with advice, resources, checklists and timelines to better
organize, bid and run a Costume-Con.

The handbook is organized in three major sections.

Section 1 is an introduction to Costume-Con; a review of the official
operating documents and obligations that a conference committee must meet.

Section 2 looks at the organization of the conference, both from the
perspective of the events that happen and the jobs and people required
to make those events happen.

Section 3 is a very rough timeline. It breaks out conference planning
into the following phases:
I. Preparing to bid
II. Bidding
III. Frome vote to conference…
IV. Conference Operations (at-con)
V. Closing (post-con)
…and lists which responsibilities fall due during those times.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 336 From: Tina Connell Date: 9/28/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…

I agree.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Byron Connell
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] A stab at the introduction…

Andy —

Nice intro.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: [runacc] A stab at the introduction…

‘k, I went back to Betsy’s outline document from back in may:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/message/100

Thoughts & Opinions?

—–
Costume-Con is an artistic endeavour.

Costume-Con is a business endeavour.

Both are true. To be a successful artistic endeavour for its members,
Costume-Con must be a smooth-running business operation behind the scenes.

That’s why this handbook exists. Our goal is to provide conference
committees with advice, resources, checklists and timelines to better
organize, bid and run a Costume-Con.

The handbook is organized in three major sections.

Section 1 is an introduction to Costume-Con; a review of the official
operating documents and obligations that a conference committee must meet.

Section 2 looks at the organization of the conference, both from the
perspective of the events that happen and the jobs and people required
to make those events happen.

Section 3 is a very rough timeline. It breaks out conference planning
into the following phases:
I. Preparing to bid
II. Bidding
III. Frome vote to conference…
IV. Conference Operations (at-con)
V. Closing (post-con)
…and lists which responsibilities fall due during those times.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 337 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 9/28/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

At 11:26 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:

>I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
>Competition”.
>
>Marty

I also would vote for (b). A listing of possible activities, none of which
are required, seems to me to be a good guideline for future committees.
We’ve been experimenting with different activities, displays and
competitions throughout the history of C-C. Such a list can spark the
creativity of a committee while re-inforcing the Costume-centric nature of
C-C’s

Pierre

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 338 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Doll competition

In a message dated 09/27/2003 12:37:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
> Competition”.
>
> Marty

Guidelines/checkoff-lists are good references.
What the ICG constitution doesn’t mandate, we could amend to show
CostumeCon activities that may also be included. (did you know the WSFS constitution
also only mandates site selection and Hugo awards at Worldcons – everything
else is just gravy)
As for the doll contest, I vote for (b), with the wording “doll costumer
competition”, because WE are costumers.

Joni Dashoff

 

Group: runacc Message: 339 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

In a message dated 09/27/2003 4:34:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years to
> 2 years. This will not take effect unless the amendment is ratified at
> Noreascon 4.
>

Proposed amendments to the WSFS constitution have been know to fail at
the second, ratification vote.
Serious opposers will ensure they are present at that meeting, because
they will know not to be scheduled elsewhere.
I would have had to give up my only program item at Torcon (costuming
with your child) to attend Saturday’s WSFS meeting; I won’t allow this to happen
to me next year.
Joni Dashoff

 

Group: runacc Message: 340 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

At 12:14 AM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>In a message dated 09/27/2003 4:34:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>attrembl@bovil.com writes:
>
> > The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years to
> > 2 years. This will not take effect unless the amendment is ratified at
> > Noreascon 4.
> >

Andy, was a reason given why Worldcon wants to change to a shorter cycle?

At the time they went to 3 years, it was because Worldcon had gotten so
huge that it took more time, logistics, etc. to get a committee together
and prepare all the necessary stuff.

I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted a
bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their potential
hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.

Discussion, anyone?

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 341 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition
Sounds like almost everybody likes (b): a listing of possible activities,
none of which
are required.

I like having an example there so “newbie” committees have something to
look at.

Perhaps we’d also better emphasize that each CC has only done 2 or 3
additional items from the list (lest some overly ambitious committee try to
do them ALL).

Maybe there could be some kind of “tally” next to each item as to how many
CC’s have had that event? (Doll Costume Contest and Single Pattern Contest
would probably have pretty high rankings.)

How good are the records? Do we actually *know* what additional contests
were run at which CC so this kind of information can be compiled?

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 342 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

Karen –

I know that when we obtained our hotel contract the rep was very
enthusiastic, very excited. Since then we’ve changed reps three times and I
am about to go and explain once again who we are and what we’re doing. I
don’t know if shortening the time would eliminate some of that or not. I do
know that some of the other SF and Anime conventions in town who haven’t
locked in their hotels to a long-term contract are having to shop around on
a yearly basis for space.

Hotels may also be holding out in hopes of an improvement in the economy,
since they are having to offer fire sale rates right now, which is actually
not a bad thing for the groups who are booking for this year. Tourism is
way down and a lot of the chains are really feeling the pinch. They may not
even be confident that they will be open three years from now.

I don’t know if you would want to change the lead time just yet. You might
want to amend the rules to specificaly allow for “date and hotel to be
announced later”.

Trudy

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] worldcon fallout…
>Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:29:07 -0400
>
>At 12:14 AM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >In a message dated 09/27/2003 4:34:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> >attrembl@bovil.com writes:
> >
> > > The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years
>to
> > > 2 years. This will not take effect unless the amendment is ratified
>at
> > > Noreascon 4.
> > >
>
>Andy, was a reason given why Worldcon wants to change to a shorter cycle?
>
>At the time they went to 3 years, it was because Worldcon had gotten so
>huge that it took more time, logistics, etc. to get a committee together
>and prepare all the necessary stuff.
>
>I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted a
>bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
>they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their potential
>hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.
>
>Discussion, anyone?
>
>–Karen
>

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 343 From: martingear Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

According to Elspeth Kovar who was at the business meeting, the feeling
was that by having a three year lead the committees were burning out, so
to save the committees stress they want to change it to a two year
lead. IMHO this is a play by some of the SMOFs to insure that WorldCons
go only to second or third tier cities. I don’t know of any of the even
second tier cities that could accept a two year lead. BucCONeer had to
change off of Labor Day weekend because we couldn’t put up a $10K
deposit 42 months out. I hope that Joni is correct and that this gets
killed next year, but as usual there is a group within smofdom that
wants the WorldCon to be run for their convenience and screw the attendees.

Marty

>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 344 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

I’m thinking I’m in favor of “B” myself – I just wanted to give all the
possible options, considering the existing language.

Not so sure about the tally – I think that may be a pain to manage over
time (one more thing to remember to update annually…).

OTOH, I can (or should be able to) glean from the PRs and other
paperwork in my possession what competitions took place at each CC. I
think I may have most of them posted already under each CC summary page,
but I can go back and doublecheck the contents of each PR/Program Book
to be sure. (I think I have all of them, now, with a very few possible
exceptions.)

Dolls started earlier by at least four years (I think) than the SP. And
the single item (Codpiece, Bra, etc) started after that, and then sort
of petered out afterwards.

I’ll see what I can do to compile the list for doublechecking here this
week.

Thanks!

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Sounds like almost everybody likes (b): a listing of possible
> activities,
> none of which
> are required.
>
> I like having an example there so “newbie” committees have something
> to
> look at.
>
> Perhaps we’d also better emphasize that each CC has only done 2 or 3
> additional items from the list (lest some overly ambitious committee
> try to
> do them ALL).
>
> Maybe there could be some kind of “tally” next to each item as to how
> many
> CC’s have had that event? (Doll Costume Contest and Single Pattern
> Contest
> would probably have pretty high rankings.)
>
> How good are the records? Do we actually *know* what additional
> contests
> were run at which CC so this kind of information can be compiled?
>
> –Karen


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 345 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…

Thanks, Andy!

Here’s my original version:

http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/intro.shtml

I think adding Andy’s language to clarify the structure of the doc is a
Very Good Idea, TM.

Here’s my suggestion: Throw out everything I wrote (since Andy says it
better than I do).

Then add after his outline (at the bottom):

This publication draws heavily on several sources, including a reading
committee (listed
in Acknowledgements), the WorldCon Runner’s Guide, the Kennedy
Masquerade
Compendium, and documentation available from previous Costume-Cons,
including
Costume-Cons Fifteen and 16.

We expect that we will leave something out. It is nearly impossible to
cover all bases, but with the help of future con committees, we hope to
fill the holes as this publication evolves.

If you have any questions concerning the contents of this publication,
please contact the
editorial team.

Thanks, and have a successful Costume-Con!

Betsy Delaney
Managing Editor

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>
> ‘k, I went back to Betsy’s outline document from back in may:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/message/100
>
> Thoughts & Opinions?
>
> —–
> Costume-Con is an artistic endeavour.
>
> Costume-Con is a business endeavour.
>
> Both are true. To be a successful artistic endeavour for its members,
> Costume-Con must be a smooth-running business operation behind the
> scenes.
>
> That’s why this handbook exists. Our goal is to provide conference
> committees with advice, resources, checklists and timelines to better
> organize, bid and run a Costume-Con.
>
> The handbook is organized in three major sections.
>
> Section 1 is an introduction to Costume-Con; a review of the official
> operating documents and obligations that a conference committee must
> meet.
>
> Section 2 looks at the organization of the conference, both from the
> perspective of the events that happen and the jobs and people required
>
> to make those events happen.
>
> Section 3 is a very rough timeline. It breaks out conference planning
> into the following phases:
> I. Preparing to bid
> II. Bidding
> III. Frome vote to conference…
> IV. Conference Operations (at-con)
> V. Closing (post-con)
> …and lists which responsibilities fall due during those times.


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 346 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 06:29 AM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> At 12:14 AM 9/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> In a message dated 09/27/2003 4:34:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> attrembl@bovil.com writes:
>>
>>> The business meeting voted to change their voting cycle from 3 years
>>> to
>>> 2 years. This will not take effect unless the amendment is ratified
>>> at
>>> Noreascon 4.
>>>
>
> Andy, was a reason given why Worldcon wants to change to a shorter
> cycle?

Neither the WSFS Business Meeting minutes nor any position papers have
been posted anywhere that I know of, so I’m going off of what I heard
from folks who were there…

Marty has the “official position” of the folks promoting the amendment
correct: the length of the bid/plan/produce process is putting a lot of
strain on the people bidding and winning site selection. A shorter site
selection cycle would result in a shorter time commitment, less stress,
and more cohesive committees.

I’m not sure I entirely agree with this argument, but I see (looking at
our CC schedule, and the way recent CCs have run) an issue with
maintaining momentum on a committee for 6-8 years. There’s definitely
an excitement cycle that surrounds a bid; high at kick-off, fading
until submission deadlines are near, high at site selection, fading
until convention deadlines come due, and possibly partial-burn-out by
the time the con happens.

I’m also not sure that I agree with the “evil smof” argument against
the amendment. While I’m certain there are backers of this change who
think it will result in smaller, easier-to-run WorldCons in smaller
cities, I think they’re going to be sorely disappointed (at least in
that it will result in WorldCon naturally scaling back or becoming
easier to run because of that).

There are people I know and trust who support the amendment, but do not
support changing the complexion of WorldCon.

I definitely agree that the impact on facilities negotiation is a big
deal, and must be more closely examined.

The 3-year vote cycle was also interestingly related to the 3-zone
cycle; since WorldCon is now in no-zone bidding that opens up a lot of
new possibilities. There is an argument against the amendment that more
time is needed to let no-zone bidding shake out before other changes to
the voting cycle is changed.

> I am also wondering how this affects CC. Bruce and Nora just submitted
> a
> bid for CC-25 where they could not 100% lock in a venue or date because
> they could not get a commitment this far out from either of their
> potential
> hotels. So maybe we should reconsider a 2-year cycle as well.

Well, this doesn’t directly affect CC in any way.

From a facilities standpoint (one of the arguments), WorldCon does
share our need for a very large amount of function space relative to
the number of hotel guests/convention members, but it’s also an
entirely different animal because it’s an order of magnitude larger.
We’re not negotiating multiple hotels and municipal convention centers.

I believe CC could operate on a 2-year cycle; WesterCon does
successfully and it’s a much larger convention. I’m not going to
suggest, though, that we change our cycle. Right now we’ve got to work
on building better momentum with the attendees, and I think active bid
committees for different bids and conventions around the country can
help do that in their regions. With a longer bid/vote cycle, we’re more
likely to have more groups spread further across the continent actively
promoting their bid/conference and Costume-Con in general. I do think
that committees need to work, though, to maintain their own momentum;
it’s no good if momentum builds with the attendees but the committees
end up crashing.

Since our Constitution is based at least in part on the WSFS
constitution, it behooves us to watch what’s happening in WSFS, at
least with regards to how it regulates WorldCon. If people are asking
questions or proposing changes there, it’s something we can learn from.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 347 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: A stab at the introduction…

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 08:27 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Thanks, Andy!
>
> Here’s my original version:
>
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/intro.shtml
>
> I think adding Andy’s language to clarify the structure of the doc is a
> Very Good Idea, TM.
>
> Here’s my suggestion: Throw out everything I wrote (since Andy says it
> better than I do).
>
> Then add after his outline (at the bottom):
>
> This publication draws heavily on several sources, including a reading
> committee (listed
> in Acknowledgements), the WorldCon Runner’s Guide, the Kennedy
> Masquerade
> Compendium, and documentation available from previous Costume-Cons,
> including
> Costume-Cons Fifteen and 16.
>
> We expect that we will leave something out. It is nearly impossible to
> cover all bases, but with the help of future con committees, we hope to
> fill the holes as this publication evolves.
>
> If you have any questions concerning the contents of this publication,
> please contact the
> editorial team.
>
> Thanks, and have a successful Costume-Con!

I lost track of your original docs on costume.org. I think this wraps
up the introduction quite nicely.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 348 From: Marc Gordon Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: worldcon fallout…
I attended the business meeting this year. A number of people, in
discussing the history of the lead time, stated that the move from two
years to three years was done because people believed it would help
worldcon secure facilities that would otherwise be rented.

The problem is that there isn’t any evidence, after 15+ years, that this
is true. The big conventions make their decisions more than three years
out, often much more. As Marty pointed out, Bucconeer lost its original
date 42 months before labor day 1998. That’s 3 1/2 years. To have saved
that date worldcon would have to move to a 4 year cycle. Worldcon can’t
compete against organizations that can put up the hard cash 4-8 years out.

I don’t think that the change will have much of an effect on the cities
that bid for worldcons. I think it may have a continuing effect on the
date of worldcon, as it did for Bucconeer. In the big cities worldcons do
not take the entire convention center. In Baltimore we had half. In
Boston N4 is renting 2/3 of the Hynes. Worldcon will get those off
weekends where there isn’t a major convention taking the whole space.
This has its positive and negative implications. A lot of fans with
children (or who are teachers) want worldcon to be earlier in August. A
lot of fans prefer worldcon to be over a holiday weekend (Labor Day).

I think the change will have a positive effect on committees. It doesn’t
take three years to put on a worldcon. It takes a year of work (in the
last year), preceded by a year of planning and recruitment. Most
committees I’ve been involved with have done precious little useful work
in the first year after the bid was won other than bicker and fracture.

-Marc

<edmond@radix.net>
After ecstasy, the laundry. — Zen koan

 

Group: runacc Message: 349 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: section 1 outline/draft
Sec 1 should be easy, and relatively short…

A. A brief history
Costume-Con was born out of the vision of Adrienne Martinez (Adrienne
Martine-Barnes), and first realized in 1983 by Karen Dick, Kelly Turner
and a crew of amateur and professional science fiction and historical
costumers in southern California. It began as (and still is) a
costume-centered weekend of competitions, classes, panel discussions
and social events. At Costume-Con 3 (1985) in Columbia, Maryland, the
International Costumers’ Guild was founded, bringing together costume
organizations from around the world; Costume-Con and the ICG have
enjoyed a symbiotic relationship ever since.

In the last two decades, Costume-Con has grown and adapted to the needs
and interests of its members. Committees have introduced new seminars,
social activities and competitions. Some have failed, some have
succeeded and a few have developed into new “traditional” activities.

For a detailed history of Costume-Con, please see the timeline at
http://www.costume-con.org/CClink/index.shtml.

B. The process in a nutshell…
If you’re reading this, you’re probably interested in putting together
a Costume-Con. Costume-Con is not operated year-to-year by the same
organization and staff. It is overseen by Karen Dick and Kelly Turner,
the holders of the “Costume-Con” trademark, but each year planning and
operations are the responsibility of a conference committee.

Putting together a Costume-Con is a multi-year process, so there are
always at least 3 seated conference committees active, and often
several “bid committees” exploring the possibility of running a
Costume-Con or actively campaigning to be selected to run a Costume-Con.

A conference committee starts, as mentioned above, with bidding. During
the bid phase, the conference committee develops its business
structure, obtains hotel/facilities agreements, and campaigns to get
people to attend or support the costume-con where their bid is voted
upon. This is at minimum a 6-month process (the deadline to be placed
on the ballot is 6 months before the vote) but is often done over a
period of 1-2 years.

After a conference committee has won their bid, they’re described as a
“seated conference committee” and have approximately 3 years to
complete the planning for their conference. During this time, the
marketing and promotion of the conference continues.

All of this culminates in the actual conference: panel discussions,
seminars, social events and competitions. It’s not over, though, when
the conference is done. It often takes a few weeks (sometimes a few
months) to wind up final business after the conference.

All in all, that’s 4-6 years from start to finish. A long time, yes,
but enough time to spread the workload out if you and your committee
pace things carefully.

C. The ConStitution
<When was the constitution originally drafted? Insert capsule history
here.>

Minimum performance standards and responsibilities are laid out in the
ConStitution. Note that carefully: Minimum performance standards and
responsibilities. The ConStitution isn’t a recipe for how to run a
Costume-Con.

As a conference committee member, you should be intimately familiar
with the contents of the ConStitution, and what it requires of you.
Conversely, when somebody tells you something is required, you should
review the ConStitution for yourself and determine whether that is
still true or not.

The ConStitution is a living document and is amended on a regular
basis. For the convenience and sanity of conference committees,
revisions will generally be made in the 60 days immediately following
the annual conference and not made in the 6 months leading up to the
next conference. Still, it is best to review the Constitution on a
regular basis.

If you have any questions about expectations or responsibilities of
your committee, ask them.

For more information, including contact information, see the
ConStitution at
http://www.costume-con.org/procedure/ccconstitution.shtml

D. The ICG Masquerade Guidelines
Several years ago, Costume-Con agreed to operate its costume
competitions in accordance with the ICG Masquerade Guidelines.

As the name says, these are guidelines. Their purpose is to help
competition directors write their rules and operate their competitions
in a manner that is fair and impartial. While they’re framed for
competition masquerades, there are aspects of the guidelines which may
be applicable to other competitions. Committee chairpersons and
competition directors should review the guidelines on a regular basis.

If you are uncertain about how to interpret any part of the guidelines,
the best course of action is to talk with past competition directors
and ask them how they interpreted the guidelines in the past, and how
their interpretations worked for them.

For more information, see the ICG Masquerade Guidelines at
http://www.costume.org/documents/guidelines.html

 

Group: runacc Message: 350 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/29/2003
Subject: Re: Doll competition

I do not agree. The ConStitution is the framework under which CCs are run. As such, I believe that it should not include nonmandatory suggestions. A list of possible activities would be appropriate for a CC Runners’ Guide.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Doll competition

At 11:26 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
>I vote for (b) for what it is worth, with the wording, “Doll Costume
>Competition”.
>
>Marty

I also would vote for (b). A listing of possible activities, none of which
are required, seems to me to be a good guideline for future committees.
We’ve been experimenting with different activities, displays and
competitions throughout the history of C-C. Such a list can spark the
creativity of a committee while re-inforcing the Costume-centric nature of
C-C’s

Pierre

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 6 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 6 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 251 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 252 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 253 From: Martin Gear Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 254 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 255 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: DRAFT CC26 packet…
Group: runacc Message: 256 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Da Packet-content listing revised
Group: runacc Message: 257 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 258 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 259 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 260 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 261 From: Tina Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 262 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 263 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Packet 0.2
Group: runacc Message: 264 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 265 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 266 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.2
Group: runacc Message: 267 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 268 From: Karen Heim Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 269 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 270 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 271 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 272 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Packet 0.3
Group: runacc Message: 273 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 274 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 275 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3
Group: runacc Message: 276 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3
Group: runacc Message: 277 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 278 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 279 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3
Group: runacc Message: 280 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3
Group: runacc Message: 281 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 282 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/7/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 283 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 284 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 285 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 286 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 287 From: martingear Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 288 From: Les Roth Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 289 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 290 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/11/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 291 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/17/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 292 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/18/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 293 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/18/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Group: runacc Message: 294 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/23/2003
Subject: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 295 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 296 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 297 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 298 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 299 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Group: runacc Message: 300 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 251 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
We have collected a lot of info from our Visitor and Convention Bureau. It’s not all useful, but it does help.
Charles CC-23

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 252 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 07:21 PM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:

> With a little modification, this would be a good thing to hand to the
> hotel
> staff so they know what we are all about.

That may just be a matter of writing up a “hotel info” sheet to include
for sales visits.

andy

andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 253 From: Martin Gear Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

Trust me, taking pictures from past Costume Cons (both S&S-F and
Historical Masquerades) to show to the hotels when you make your visits
can be very educational. Watch for the sales droids reactions and body
language. It can save you from signing with a property that will be
hostile to the convention once it gets there, and possibly point you to
a hotel that will be thrilled to have us.

Marty who’s been there and done that.

Andrew Trembley wrote:

> On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 07:21 PM, henryosier@cs.com wrote:
>
>>With a little modification, this would be a good thing to hand to the
>>hotel
>>staff so they know what we are all about.
>
> That may just be a matter of writing up a “hotel info” sheet to include
> for sales visits.
>
> andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 254 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Venue question…
…or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?

I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
“Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better title).
It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and one
of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 255 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: DRAFT CC26 packet…
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf

take a look, give me your comments. This is the “pre-vote” packet.
First page is cover-letter, next two sides are marketing/campaign
report, last two sides are hotel introduction. Doesn’t include photo
portfolio pages.

Once we’ve got a hotel agreement, the marketing/campaign report will be
expanded, and the hotel introduction won’t be as important (and
obviously won’t be sent out to anybody but the hotel we’ve got). Post
vote expect more details on panels and other such things.

I’m running this by my hotel and marketing people too, of course…

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 256 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Da Packet-content listing revised

On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 03:53 PM, Andrew Trembley wrote:

> So what really needs to go into the packet?

1. A cover letter
2. A 2- or 4-side report with more detailed information about the
conference
3. A 2-side report tailored to hotel sales staff
4. A 1-4 page “portfolio” showing examples of masquerade and contest
entries
5. Copies of event fliers relevant to the organization

All can go into a simple pocket folder with the conference name and
logo stickered on to the front.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 257 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Not to my knowledge. The only one I know of that might have come close
to having trouble with paying the hotel was CC7, since I recall there
were a lot of financial issues with the Kennedys’ con. I think that CCs
which came after took the lessons of CC7 to heart and most or all came
out ahead in some way.

CCXV got stung at the end by problems with our hotel’s electric bill,
and so didn’t make as much as we expected to, and we had to pay for
video editing that wasn’t originally budgeted (which came directly out
of the income from the video sales), but we were still able to pass on
somewhere between two and three thousand dollars to future CCs.

-Betsy

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>
> …or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
>
> meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?
>
> I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
> “Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better
> title).
> It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and
> one
> of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
> and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 258 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

CC7 paid the hotel in full at the end of the con. The “financial trouble” was a result of Pat and Peggy writing a personal check to the hotel instead of a check on the con’s account! We then had the difficulty of justifying why a not-for-profit organization was paying a sizable sum to them.

No one on the committee knew what they had done until it was too late.

The CC7 treasurer (Tina) was not amused. The mere appearance of self-dealing between a not-for-profit corporation and its officers could lead to audit disallowances, revocation of recognition of tax-exempt status, and both civil and criminal prosecution. Fortunately, that didn’t happen in the case of CC7; the fiscal agent for the con was LASTsfa, the local science fiction club, of which Pat and Peggy were not even members (thank Ghod!). The lesson to be learned is that ALL members of the concom need to exercise self-discipline.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…

Not to my knowledge. The only one I know of that might have come close
to having trouble with paying the hotel was CC7, since I recall there
were a lot of financial issues with the Kennedys’ con. I think that CCs
which came after took the lessons of CC7 to heart and most or all came
out ahead in some way.

CCXV got stung at the end by problems with our hotel’s electric bill,
and so didn’t make as much as we expected to, and we had to pay for
video editing that wasn’t originally budgeted (which came directly out
of the income from the video sales), but we were still able to pass on
somewhere between two and three thousand dollars to future CCs.

-Betsy

Andrew T Trembley wrote:
>
> …or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
>
> meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?
>
> I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
> “Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better
> title).
> It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and
> one
> of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
> and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 259 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Did CC17 have problems? I thought I remembered Rob Himmelsbach saying
something about financial problems with the hotel, but perhaps they got
settled out OK at the end.

Trudy

>From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…
>Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:20:25 -0400
>
>CC7 paid the hotel in full at the end of the con. The “financial trouble”
>was a result of Pat and Peggy writing a personal check to the hotel instead
>of a check on the con’s account! We then had the difficulty of justifying
>why a not-for-profit organization was paying a sizable sum to them.
>
>No one on the committee knew what they had done until it was too late.
>
>The CC7 treasurer (Tina) was not amused. The mere appearance of
>self-dealing between a not-for-profit corporation and its officers could
>lead to audit disallowances, revocation of recognition of tax-exempt
>status, and both civil and criminal prosecution. Fortunately, that didn’t
>happen in the case of CC7; the fiscal agent for the con was LASTsfa, the
>local science fiction club, of which Pat and Peggy were not even members
>(thank Ghod!). The lesson to be learned is that ALL members of the concom
>need to exercise self-discipline.
>
>Byron
>
>
>—– Original Message —–
> From: Betsy Delaney
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…
>
>
> Not to my knowledge. The only one I know of that might have come close
> to having trouble with paying the hotel was CC7, since I recall there
> were a lot of financial issues with the Kennedys’ con. I think that CCs
> which came after took the lessons of CC7 to heart and most or all came
> out ahead in some way.
>
> CCXV got stung at the end by problems with our hotel’s electric bill,
> and so didn’t make as much as we expected to, and we had to pay for
> video editing that wasn’t originally budgeted (which came directly out
> of the income from the video sales), but we were still able to pass on
> somewhere between two and three thousand dollars to future CCs.
>
> -Betsy
>
> Andrew T Trembley wrote:
> >
> > …or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
> >
> > meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?
> >
> > I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
> > “Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better
> > title).
> > It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and
> > one
> > of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
> > and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.
> >
> > —
> > andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> > San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> > (Kevin’s)
> > “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> > –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Costume-Con Archivist
> Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 

Group: runacc Message: 260 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/3/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Byron, it was my understanding that the con was $$$$ over budget (mostly
due to the hotel bill), and that was why Pat & Peggy had to kick in their
personal funds…? But I was not on the committee and don’t know the whole
story.

–Karen

At 09:20 PM 6/3/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>CC7 paid the hotel in full at the end of the con. The “financial trouble”
>was a result of Pat and Peggy writing a personal check to the hotel
>instead of a check on the con’s account! We then had the difficulty of
>justifying why a not-for-profit organization was paying a sizable sum to them.
>
>No one on the committee knew what they had done until it was too late.
>
>The CC7 treasurer (Tina) was not amused. The mere appearance of
>self-dealing between a not-for-profit corporation and its officers could
>lead to audit disallowances, revocation of recognition of tax-exempt
>status, and both civil and criminal prosecution. Fortunately, that didn’t
>happen in the case of CC7; the fiscal agent for the con was LASTsfa, the
>local science fiction club, of which Pat and Peggy were not even members
>(thank Ghod!). The lesson to be learned is that ALL members of the concom
>need to exercise self-discipline.
>
>Byron
>
>
>—– Original Message —–
> From: Betsy Delaney
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…
>
>
> Not to my knowledge. The only one I know of that might have come close
> to having trouble with paying the hotel was CC7, since I recall there
> were a lot of financial issues with the Kennedys’ con. I think that CCs
> which came after took the lessons of CC7 to heart and most or all came
> out ahead in some way.
>
> CCXV got stung at the end by problems with our hotel’s electric bill,
> and so didn’t make as much as we expected to, and we had to pay for
> video editing that wasn’t originally budgeted (which came directly out
> of the income from the video sales), but we were still able to pass on
> somewhere between two and three thousand dollars to future CCs.
>
> -Betsy
>
> Andrew T Trembley wrote:
> >
> > …or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
> >
> > meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?
> >
> > I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
> > “Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better
> > title).
> > It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and
> > one
> > of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
> > and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.
> >
> > —
> > andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> > San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> > (Kevin’s)
> > “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> > –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
>
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Costume-Con Archivist
> Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 261 From: Tina Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Since I was probably closest to that one (aside from the dear departed – SIGH!) I think it is safe to say that the hotel got paid O.K., it was the Kennedy’s who took the hit. I don’t believe that the hotel had any inkling that there were financial issues, so there wouldn’t be anything in “the record” that would cause a problem that way for future CC’s.

The real problem there was that the hotel kept the housing and banquet departments separate. The banquet (i.e., function space) dept. didn’t really give a **** how many rooms we filled. They wanted their department’s budget to make a bundle, regardless. That’s something to look out for in doing a hotel search.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…

Not to my knowledge. The only one I know of that might have come close
to having trouble with paying the hotel was CC7, since I recall there
were a lot of financial issues with the Kennedys’ con. I think that CCs
which came after took the lessons of CC7 to heart and most or all came
out ahead in some way.

CCXV got stung at the end by problems with our hotel’s electric bill,
and so didn’t make as much as we expected to, and we had to pay for
video editing that wasn’t originally budgeted (which came directly out
of the income from the video sales), but we were still able to pass on
somewhere between two and three thousand dollars to future CCs.

-Betsy

Andrew T Trembley wrote:
>
> …or not. Anybody know if any past Costume-Cons have had any problems
>
> meeting their financial obligations to the hotel?
>
> I’ve taken Marty and Henry’s comments to heart and am working on a
> “Costume-Con Venue Information Guide” (and looking for a better
> title).
> It’s based on the briefing list in the WorldCon runners’ guide, and
> one
> of the things they suggest emphasizing is the con’s financial history
> and creditworthiness in the eyes of hotels.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 262 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
Having the banquet and rooms sales separate seems to be the exception. Usually the hotels seem to have “sales and catering” which are very aware of the combined income of rooms and function space. The odd case of a hotel just opening seems to break those rules. They seem to have a sales agent that is willing to say anything, and then let the hotel sort it out later. Be cautious of deals that look “too good to be true” it that situation. This is just my local experience.
Charles

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 263 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Packet 0.2
http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf

I’ve made revisions. Still no portfolio pics, just the reports. I would
particularly like to hear what folks who have done hotel negotiations
have to say about the last two pages (venue information guide).

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 264 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Unfortunately, that wasn’t true in New York’s Capital District at the time, nor, I believe, today. All our major hotels have split catering/functions as a separate profit center from rooms. This may be a local headache caused by demand for function space for events unrelated to the need for sleeping rooms that results from our government/academic/research economic mix, but other state capitals with similar needs might find similar hotel policies.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Charles Galway
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…

Having the banquet and rooms sales separate seems to be the exception. Usually the hotels seem to have “sales and catering” which are very aware of the combined income of rooms and function space. The odd case of a hotel just opening seems to break those rules. They seem to have a sales agent that is willing to say anything, and then let the hotel sort it out later. Be cautious of deals that look “too good to be true” it that situation. This is just my local experience.
Charles

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 265 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show
I was just over on the Costume-Con site, compiling a list of designers
whose work has appeared in the Costume-Con Fashion Show over the last 21
years. This is part of a side project I am doing to try to track down all
these designers and get permissions (or definite refusals) to use the line
art for their designs next to the photos of the Fashion Show pieces
displayed on the CC website.

Anyway, since I was in and out of ALL the Fashion Show stuff in one sitting
tonight, I noticed a very interesting pattern in the number of participants
and felt I should comment on it here.

The Fashion Show was a very strong part of Costume-Con 1-11, with the
smallest show being 16 entries (CC-2), the largest show being 49 entries
(CC-8), and the average being around 28 entries (with 8 of the 11
conventions having Fashion Shows of 20+ entries).

The numbers drop DRAMATICALLY at Costume-Con 12 (from 24 entries in the
show the year before to only 9 entries at CC-12). They continue to be low
thoughout the next 8 Costume-Cons, with the smallest show being 4 (CC-19),
and the largest show being 14 (CC-15). I kept asking myself why the Fashion
Show would be so small, especially at CC-12 and CC-15, which were
well-attended cons in large cities.

Then it hit me. CC-12 was the first CC to try the Single Pattern Contest.
The dropping numbers in the Fashion Show indicate to me that CC attendees
have only so much time/energy/$$$ to devote to preparing for CC, so when
further competitions are added that require advance preparation (and are
run on the same day as the Fashion Show), the Fashion Show numbers suffer.

I don’t think Iron Costumer impacted CC-21 in quite the same way, as the
teams did not have to prepare anything in advance. [Although I would be
interested in hearing the Swopes’ comments on being on one of the teams for
Iron Costumer AND trying to compete in the Historical on the same
night(!).] [I also would STRONGLY suggest running Iron Costumer in a
different time slot so it does not impact the Historical Masquerade awards.]

CC-21’s Fashion Show, at a respectable 19 entries, was the largest in the
last 9 years.

Trudy, I know CC-22 is running a Single Pattern Contest, and you have
selected some really cool patterns. However, if there is any way to
schedule the modeling of items for the Single Pattern Contest so it is not
essentially in the same time slot as the Fashion Show, it might help to
increase participation in the Fashion Show. Just a thought.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 266 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.2

Andy —

While I can’t speak as someone who has been involved recently in hotel negotiations, generally speaking, I like the draft very much. Good job!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Lance Moore
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:57 PM
Subject: [runacc] Packet 0.2

http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf

I’ve made revisions. Still no portfolio pics, just the reports. I would
particularly like to hear what folks who have done hotel negotiations
have to say about the last two pages (venue information guide).

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 267 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/4/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Karen,

I have to agree with you on all points. It is impossible (or nearly so) to
enter the FFF and Single Pattern contest at the same time. Doing Iron
Costumer and competing in the Historical was also a real challenge. The
Swopes partially changed between events, and I just charged through without
changing. (We were on the same team.). Also, although we were directly
below the MC, I have practically no memory of any of the Historical awards,
because we were so totally concentrated in our event.

Elaine

> I was just over on the Costume-Con site, compiling a list of designers
> whose work has appeared in the Costume-Con Fashion Show over the last 21
> years. This is part of a side project I am doing to try to track down all
> these designers and get permissions (or definite refusals) to use the line
> art for their designs next to the photos of the Fashion Show pieces
> displayed on the CC website.
>
> Anyway, since I was in and out of ALL the Fashion Show stuff in one

sitting

> tonight, I noticed a very interesting pattern in the number of

participants

> and felt I should comment on it here.
>
> The Fashion Show was a very strong part of Costume-Con 1-11, with the
> smallest show being 16 entries (CC-2), the largest show being 49 entries
> (CC-8), and the average being around 28 entries (with 8 of the 11
> conventions having Fashion Shows of 20+ entries).
>
> The numbers drop DRAMATICALLY at Costume-Con 12 (from 24 entries in the
> show the year before to only 9 entries at CC-12). They continue to be low
> thoughout the next 8 Costume-Cons, with the smallest show being 4 (CC-19),
> and the largest show being 14 (CC-15). I kept asking myself why the

Fashion

> Show would be so small, especially at CC-12 and CC-15, which were
> well-attended cons in large cities.
>
> Then it hit me. CC-12 was the first CC to try the Single Pattern Contest.
> The dropping numbers in the Fashion Show indicate to me that CC attendees
> have only so much time/energy/$$$ to devote to preparing for CC, so when
> further competitions are added that require advance preparation (and are
> run on the same day as the Fashion Show), the Fashion Show numbers suffer.
>
> I don’t think Iron Costumer impacted CC-21 in quite the same way, as the
> teams did not have to prepare anything in advance. [Although I would be
> interested in hearing the Swopes’ comments on being on one of the teams

for

> Iron Costumer AND trying to compete in the Historical on the same
> night(!).] [I also would STRONGLY suggest running Iron Costumer in a
> different time slot so it does not impact the Historical Masquerade

awards.]

>
> CC-21’s Fashion Show, at a respectable 19 entries, was the largest in the
> last 9 years.
>
> Trudy, I know CC-22 is running a Single Pattern Contest, and you have
> selected some really cool patterns. However, if there is any way to
> schedule the modeling of items for the Single Pattern Contest so it is not
> essentially in the same time slot as the Fashion Show, it might help to
> increase participation in the Fashion Show. Just a thought.
>
> –Karen
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 268 From: Karen Heim Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Nora and I did this at a CC. The Single Pattern contest was first (the
one with the Irish dress), followed immediately by the FFS. We had to
be scheduled early in the Single Pattern show so that we could change.
We ran back to the green room, literally stripped down to nothing, and
got our FFS outfits on. If a lot of people tried to do that, scheduling
everyone so that they would have enough time to change is doubtful.

Karen

Elaine wrote:

> Karen,
>
> I have to agree with you on all points. It is impossible (or nearly
> so) to
> enter the FFF and Single Pattern contest at the same time.

 

Group: runacc Message: 269 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Since the Single Pattern Contest and Iron Costumer were both first produced
by me, I’m going to address them both in one response. My apologies for the
mild bits of ranting that will occur. There are many bits of strong and
not-so-humble opinion herein.

> Then it hit me. CC-12 was the first CC to try the Single Pattern Contest.
> The dropping numbers in the Fashion Show indicate to me that CC attendees
> have only so much time/energy/$$$ to devote to preparing for CC, so when
> further competitions are added that require advance preparation (and are
> run on the same day as the Fashion Show), the Fashion Show numbers suffer.

The SPC was started because for several years in a row I heard from people
who were afraid to make anything for the Future Fashion show because they
were afraid to try to draft the patterns.

CC-12 also very definitely restricted accepted designs for the FFF to
FASHION. If you review the FF show photos for the years immediately prior to
CC-12, you will note that there was a huge swing towards making the
“theatrical” designs in the folio. In other words, making a STAGE COSTUME
that didn’t have to compete in a masquerade. After having to follow the
“Goth Vampire Queen Elizabeth Opera Dress” (or whatever it was actually
called) on stage I was personally *sick to death* of having really cool
*fashion* being upstaged by stage diva chic. And I had also noticed a
disturbing sameness (to me) developing in the designs appearing in the
Folios in those years — there wasn’t a whole lot that felt *new* from year
to year.

This year I suggested to Pierre and Sandy a modified Single Pattern Contest:
that instead of having a competition of constructed garments, they roll the
SPC into the DESIGN contest that creates the folio. In other words, the
single pattern designs would go into the folio and any garments made from
those designs would be part of the regular Future Fashion Show. I came up
with the idea too late, but I offer it as a recommendation to other CCs. The
fear of scratch pattern drafting is a very real one; knowing what pattern a
design is based on could actually further increase participation in the
show.

So while there is definitely a synchronicity with CC 12, the single pattern
contest, and reduced number of FF designs being made, don’t discount the
fact that the content of the folio will also have a strong effect. (Also, at
CC12 we had the wearable art display as part of the runway show, too. All
three were combined and mixed into a single “Dimensions in Design” show on
Sunday — we put 40-odd designs down that runway in 45 minutes)

> night(!).] [I also would STRONGLY suggest running Iron Costumer in a
> different time slot so it does not impact the Historical Masquerade

awards.]

Now — as to this. I agree that we screwed up the impact of the historical
awards at I.C. Give me a break — no one had tried this as a real production
(meaning staged, narrated, the works) before.

I had thought we would actually be bringing the house lights down and stage
lights up for each of those commercial breaks, so that they would have far
greater dramatic impact. I failed to realize until too late that we would
need task lighting for the work tables to do that. In hindsight, the correct
decision would have been, as others have suggested, holding all the
historical awards until after Iron Costumer was finished.

As to finding another time slot: THERE WEREN’T ANY. The stage and tech were
not installed until Saturday, so we couldn’t do it as a Friday night
entertainment. Saturday afternoon was tech rehearsal for F&SF. Sunday day
was the Fashion Show. Sunday night was the Historical masquerade — and then
it occurred to me to ask if Nancy had any half-time entertainment scheduled.
She didn’t, and so I offered Iron Costumer as that entertainment.

For those who commented that IC seemed to be designed to keep everyone in
the room while the judges deliberated: duh. That’s what half-time
entertainment is SUPPOSED to do.
And for the record — we finished just as the judges returned with the final
awards.

OK, I’m off my soapbox now. Sorry for the rant.

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 270 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Karen –

If you don’t mind, I’m going to forward your comments on over to Nora Mai
who is running both the FFF and Single Pattern shows. We have not yet
settled on a time and day for them, although I know that Sunday is
traditional. I hate to admit that I haven’t even seen the Single Pattern
and FFF for the past couple of years. In Chicago, it was the same time as
when we were hosting the Con-suite, but I have noticed previously that the
numbers on both seemed to be dropping from the first CCs that we attended.
Thanks for your comments,

Trudy

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Fashion Show
>Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:10:20 -0400
>
>I was just over on the Costume-Con site, compiling a list of designers
>whose work has appeared in the Costume-Con Fashion Show over the last 21
>years. This is part of a side project I am doing to try to track down all
>these designers and get permissions (or definite refusals) to use the line
>art for their designs next to the photos of the Fashion Show pieces
>displayed on the CC website.
>
>Anyway, since I was in and out of ALL the Fashion Show stuff in one sitting
>tonight, I noticed a very interesting pattern in the number of participants
>and felt I should comment on it here.
>
>The Fashion Show was a very strong part of Costume-Con 1-11, with the
>smallest show being 16 entries (CC-2), the largest show being 49 entries
>(CC-8), and the average being around 28 entries (with 8 of the 11
>conventions having Fashion Shows of 20+ entries).
>
>The numbers drop DRAMATICALLY at Costume-Con 12 (from 24 entries in the
>show the year before to only 9 entries at CC-12). They continue to be low
>thoughout the next 8 Costume-Cons, with the smallest show being 4 (CC-19),
>and the largest show being 14 (CC-15). I kept asking myself why the Fashion
>Show would be so small, especially at CC-12 and CC-15, which were
>well-attended cons in large cities.
>
>Then it hit me. CC-12 was the first CC to try the Single Pattern Contest.
>The dropping numbers in the Fashion Show indicate to me that CC attendees
>have only so much time/energy/$$$ to devote to preparing for CC, so when
>further competitions are added that require advance preparation (and are
>run on the same day as the Fashion Show), the Fashion Show numbers suffer.
>
>I don’t think Iron Costumer impacted CC-21 in quite the same way, as the
>teams did not have to prepare anything in advance. [Although I would be
>interested in hearing the Swopes’ comments on being on one of the teams for
>Iron Costumer AND trying to compete in the Historical on the same
>night(!).] [I also would STRONGLY suggest running Iron Costumer in a
>different time slot so it does not impact the Historical Masquerade
>awards.]
>
>CC-21’s Fashion Show, at a respectable 19 entries, was the largest in the
>last 9 years.
>
>Trudy, I know CC-22 is running a Single Pattern Contest, and you have
>selected some really cool patterns. However, if there is any way to
>schedule the modeling of items for the Single Pattern Contest so it is not
>essentially in the same time slot as the Fashion Show, it might help to
>increase participation in the Fashion Show. Just a thought.
>
>–Karen
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 

Group: runacc Message: 271 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Kevin–

Wasn’t trying to pick on you or contests you started; just trying to figure
out whattheheck happened to the Fashion Show (which has been a personal
favorite of mine since I was attending cons in the early 70’s with Fashion
Shows run by Bjo Trimble) and figure out if there is some hope of fixing it.

At 11:32 PM 6/4/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>The SPC was started because for several years in a row I heard from people
>who were afraid to make anything for the Future Fashion show because they
>were afraid to try to draft the patterns.

That doesn’t explain why the Fashion Show numbers held so uniformly for 11
years and then dropped off. (It also doesn’t explain the large fashion
shows at the Equicons in the 70’s.) If people couldn’t draft patterns, it
should have been a problem from the beginning.

With so many costume patterns on the market now from Simplicity and other
sources, it seems to me that someone making a design for the Fashion Show
could find something *close* and go from there. A savvy designer might even
suggest potential patterns for someone wanting to make up the design.

Now that I think about it, I’m wondering if the Historical Masquerade is
impacting the Fashion Show as well, as the Historical has grown in size and
complexity (and pre-judging) over the years and more people are
participating in that.

>CC-12 also very definitely restricted accepted designs for the FFF to
>FASHION.

But Fashion always has included stage, theatrical, and ceremonial costume.

>If you review the FF show photos for the years immediately prior to
>CC-12, you will note that there was a huge swing towards making the
>”theatrical” designs in the folio. In other words, making a STAGE COSTUME
>that didn’t have to compete in a masquerade.

I think part of the appeal of the Fashion Show was that you could make a
cool costume that had ALREADY WON something on the strength of its design.
So there was no competition pressure.

And yes, there were some grandiose designs that got made up.

And some less overblown stuff that got made up as well.

>After having to follow the “Goth Vampire Queen Elizabeth Opera Dress” (or
>whatever it was actually called) on stage I was personally *sick to death*
>of having really cool
>*fashion* being upstaged by stage diva chic.

And fashion shows by real runway designers today have always included some
theatrical/grandiose designs (and presentations!) that were *never*
intended for street wear. Witness Thierry Mugler, Alexander McQueen, and
Jean Paul Gaultier. And the excessive Oscar de la Renta sows in the 80’s.

>And I had also noticed a disturbing sameness (to me) developing in the
>designs appearing in the
>Folios in those years — there wasn’t a whole lot that felt *new* from
>year to year.

There was a trend for designers to resubmit their designs that hadn’t made
it into the Folio in one year until they got in.

There was a dwindling pool of designers. The traditional designers were
going through Life stuff or whatever and not submitting new stuff, and the
FFF was not attracting new designers for whatever reason.

I haven’t gone through the actual Folios, but of the stuff that got made up
for the Fashion Show, only 123 designers are represented over 21 years.
That isn’t very many names, if you think about it. That means there’s a lot
of the same names participating from year to year.

>This year I suggested to Pierre and Sandy a modified Single Pattern Contest:
>that instead of having a competition of constructed garments, they roll the
>SPC into the DESIGN contest that creates the folio. In other words, the
>single pattern designs would go into the folio and any garments made from
>those designs would be part of the regular Future Fashion Show. I came up
>with the idea too late, but I offer it as a recommendation to other CCs. The
>fear of scratch pattern drafting is a very real one; knowing what pattern a
>design is based on could actually further increase participation in the
>show.

This is an interesting idea and worth pursuing.

Also sounds like CC could use some panels/workshops on scratch pattern
drafting so people can get over their fears and get on with making cool
costumes, LOL!

>All three were combined and mixed into a single “Dimensions in Design” show on
>Sunday — we put 40-odd designs down that runway in 45 minutes)

Ricky, playing Devil’s Advocate, says if there are 20+ costumes of *any*
variety on stage on Sunday afternoon, then I shouldn’t complain, so Trudy,
you should take his dissenting opinion under advisement as well…Maybe
people don’t care about the source of what’s on stage as long as it’s a
good show.

But, personally, I would like to see more participation in the Fashion
Show. And I freely admit I have been one of the laggards who hasn’t been
making anything lately.

>[Re Iron Costumer] I agree that we screwed up the impact of the historical
>awards at I.C. Give me a break — no one had tried this as a real production
>(meaning staged, narrated, the works) before.

Wasn’t your fault. I.C. had never been tried before. Only reason I’m
commenting on it is to try to figure out solutions for next time, because,
overall, I.C. was a hoot.

>As to finding another time slot: THERE WEREN’T ANY. The stage and tech were
>not installed until Saturday, so we couldn’t do it as a Friday night
>entertainment.

But maybe Friday Night might be a possibility at Future CC’s that care to
run I.C.?

Other events have been run successfully at the same time as the Social (I
think the original $1.98 competition was, and at least one “retro” Fashion
Show), so this is a possibility if the Social is being run in the same
ballroom space as the other staged events.

>OK, I’m off my soapbox now. Sorry for the rant.

Again, not picking on the events…just trying to figure out ways we can
have all these events and let as many people as possible participate in them.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 272 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Packet 0.3
I’ve made a few changes to the text based on comments I’ve received,
and I’ve pulled a few pictures from the archives to make up sample
portfolio pages. If I can get permissions from folks, they may end up
being my final portfolio pages.

Warning: the PDF is pretty big now that the photos have been added, so
it may take a while to download if you’re on dial-up.
http://www.bovil.com/Posters/Packet.pdf

andy

andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 273 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

It’s not impossible. With a lot of green room help — and a little bit of luck — it can be done! The green room needs to know what the sequence of both sets of entries is and be prepared to assist in lightning changes. If I knew what was needed, I’d be willing to do it.

Otherwise, the FFS/SPC usually is a walk in the park for the green room crew.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Karen Heim
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Fashion Show

Nora and I did this at a CC. The Single Pattern contest was first (the
one with the Irish dress), followed immediately by the FFS. We had to
be scheduled early in the Single Pattern show so that we could change.
We ran back to the green room, literally stripped down to nothing, and
got our FFS outfits on. If a lot of people tried to do that, scheduling
everyone so that they would have enough time to change is doubtful.

Karen

Elaine wrote:

> Karen,
>
> I have to agree with you on all points. It is impossible (or nearly
> so) to
> enter the FFF and Single Pattern contest at the same time.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 274 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Kevin,

After all of that, I still would enter I.C. again. It was a blast from
start to finish! The hungry hovering over select stacks-o-stuph before we
could begin grabbing, the fruitless search for a rotary cutter – which led
us to resort to an exacto knife, the feverish working with unfamiliar
machines…………….I loved it! PLEASE put me in for the next one!

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!

> Since the Single Pattern Contest and Iron Costumer were both first

produced

> by me, I’m going to address them both in one response. My apologies for

the

> mild bits of ranting that will occur. There are many bits of strong and
> not-so-humble opinion herein.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 275 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/5/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3

Andy, I’m getting a “404 Not Found” for this URL.

???

–Karen

At 04:14 PM 6/5/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>Warning: the PDF is pretty big now that the photos have been added, so
>it may take a while to download if you’re on dial-up.
>http://www.bovil.com/Posters/Packet.pdf
>
>andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 276 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3

On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 08:18 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Andy, I’m getting a “404 Not Found” for this URL.

That would be because I botched it…

http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 277 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

At 09:10 PM 6/4/2003, you wrote:

Karen,

CC21’s not having a Single Pattern competition was largely because Sandy
and I strongly opposed it precisely because we thought it was having an
effect on Show entries. Also of concern was the lateness of many folios,
though I don’t have a list of release dates. That was one of the reasons we
were strongly committed to getting the folio out by mid-November to allow
everyone at least 5 months for construction.

Pierre

>I was just over on the Costume-Con site, compiling a list of designers
>whose work has appeared in the Costume-Con Fashion Show over the last 21
>years. This is part of a side project I am doing to try to track down all
>these designers and get permissions (or definite refusals) to use the line
>art for their designs next to the photos of the Fashion Show pieces
>displayed on the CC website.
>
>Anyway, since I was in and out of ALL the Fashion Show stuff in one sitting
>tonight, I noticed a very interesting pattern in the number of participants
>and felt I should comment on it here.
>
>The Fashion Show was a very strong part of Costume-Con 1-11, with the
>smallest show being 16 entries (CC-2), the largest show being 49 entries
>(CC-8), and the average being around 28 entries (with 8 of the 11
>conventions having Fashion Shows of 20+ entries).
>
>The numbers drop DRAMATICALLY at Costume-Con 12 (from 24 entries in the
>show the year before to only 9 entries at CC-12). They continue to be low
>thoughout the next 8 Costume-Cons, with the smallest show being 4 (CC-19),
>and the largest show being 14 (CC-15). I kept asking myself why the Fashion
>Show would be so small, especially at CC-12 and CC-15, which were
>well-attended cons in large cities.
>
>Then it hit me. CC-12 was the first CC to try the Single Pattern Contest.
>The dropping numbers in the Fashion Show indicate to me that CC attendees
>have only so much time/energy/$$$ to devote to preparing for CC, so when
>further competitions are added that require advance preparation (and are
>run on the same day as the Fashion Show), the Fashion Show numbers suffer.
>
>I don’t think Iron Costumer impacted CC-21 in quite the same way, as the
>teams did not have to prepare anything in advance. [Although I would be
>interested in hearing the Swopes’ comments on being on one of the teams for
>Iron Costumer AND trying to compete in the Historical on the same
>night(!).] [I also would STRONGLY suggest running Iron Costumer in a
>different time slot so it does not impact the Historical Masquerade awards.]
>
>CC-21’s Fashion Show, at a respectable 19 entries, was the largest in the
>last 9 years.
>
>Trudy, I know CC-22 is running a Single Pattern Contest, and you have
>selected some really cool patterns. However, if there is any way to
>schedule the modeling of items for the Single Pattern Contest so it is not
>essentially in the same time slot as the Fashion Show, it might help to
>increase participation in the Fashion Show. Just a thought.
>
>–Karen

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 278 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

At 05:01 PM 6/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>CC21’s not having a Single Pattern competition was largely because Sandy
>and I strongly opposed it precisely because we thought it was having an
>effect on Show entries.

And CC-21’s Fashion Show was the strongest in the last 10 years. Good work!

I like the Single Pattern Contest, but we need to find a way to not have it
impact the Fashion Show so badly.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 279 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3

Andy–

Looks good!

Two very minor corrections:

Forgot to note the page number, but Costume-Con 1 was held in 1983, not 1982.

And on the page showing examples of Historical costume (pg .7?), it says
CC_15 in St. Louis, MO. Should be CC-16.

This took FOREVER to load on my pitiful dial-up connection. Had to leave
the room and go watch TV for awhile, LOL!

–Karen

At 09:54 PM 6/5/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 08:18 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:
>
> > Andy, I’m getting a “404 Not Found” for this URL.
>
>That would be because I botched it…
>
>http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf
>
>
>–
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
>San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
>(Kevin’s)
>…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 280 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Packet 0.3

On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 11:15 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> Forgot to note the page number, but Costume-Con 1 was held in 1983,
> not 1982.

Got it. 2 spots.

> And on the page showing examples of Historical costume (pg .7?), it
> says
> CC_15 in St. Louis, MO. Should be CC-16.

Either I corrected this before you sent me this message, or one of us
was hallucinating.

> This took FOREVER to load on my pitiful dial-up connection. Had to
> leave
> the room and go watch TV for awhile, LOL!

This packet is intended only for print distribution, so I’m not worried
about the size or download time.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 281 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/6/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

OK. If we just eliminate sleeping and bathroom breaks
altogether…………….

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!

>
> I like the Single Pattern Contest, but we need to find a way to not have

it

> impact the Fashion Show so badly.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 282 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/7/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

At 08:16 PM 6/6/2003, you wrote:

>OK. If we just eliminate sleeping and bathroom breaks
>altogether…………….

You mean you haven’t got that down yet?

Pierre and Sandy

>Elaine
>
>Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!
> >
> > I like the Single Pattern Contest, but we need to find a way to not have
>it
> > impact the Fashion Show so badly.
> >
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 283 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fashion Show

Well, I have learned to sleep in the bathroom. It’s a start.

Elaine

> At 08:16 PM 6/6/2003, you wrote:
> >OK. If we just eliminate sleeping and bathroom breaks
> >altogether…………….
>
>
> You mean you haven’t got that down yet?
>
> Pierre and Sandy

 

Group: runacc Message: 284 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…
CC17 was one of the conventions which passed a donation on to us from its
profits, so I would have to assume that their hotel bill was covered.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–
From: Trudy Leonard

Did CC17 have problems? I thought I remembered Rob Himmelsbach saying
something about financial problems with the hotel, but perhaps they got
settled out OK at the end.

Trudy

 

Group: runacc Message: 285 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Then I think that pretty much answers the question: No, we’ve never had
a hotel that didn’t get paid. It just cost us more than we budgeted for
on a number of occasions. Now we just need to identify what happened, so
we can try to stop the problem from happening again in the future.

Agreed?

Cheers,

Betsy

Cliff and Eileen wrote:

>
> CC17 was one of the conventions which passed a donation on to us from
> its
> profits, so I would have to assume that their hotel bill was covered.
>
> Eileen


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 286 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 01:42 PM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Then I think that pretty much answers the question: No, we’ve never had
> a hotel that didn’t get paid. It just cost us more than we budgeted for
> on a number of occasions. Now we just need to identify what happened,
> so
> we can try to stop the problem from happening again in the future.

I added (if you haven’t looked recently) a paragraph about how CC’s are
run by different groups but what we all have in common has been a
history of fiscal responsibility, and creditworthiness. Glad to hear
that if anybody decides to check up on it, we’re in the clear.

http://www.cc26.info/Posters/Packet.pdf
(warning, 7.6mb file, will take long time to download over dial-up)

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 287 From: martingear Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

A new “Gotcha!” to look out for. Hotels have started charging a
“service charge” (around 15%) on the rental for the function space, and
they are hiding it in some part of the agreement that is not directly
related to the function space charges. You may be able to negotiate it
away or at least a smaller percentage as you are also going to be
charged for set-ups beyond the initial one, but even if you can’t get
rid of it, you had better be prepared for it in your budgeting. This
has just become prevalent in the past couple of years.

Marty

Betsy Delaney wrote:

>Then I think that pretty much answers the question: No, we’ve never had
>a hotel that didn’t get paid. It just cost us more than we budgeted for
>on a number of occasions. Now we just need to identify what happened, so
>we can try to stop the problem from happening again in the future.
>
>Agreed?
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 288 From: Les Roth Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Service charges became common in Iowa quite some time ago. Currently
the range from 18% – 21%. You need to add up all of the costs: base
price, service charge, and sales tax when figuring out what your hotel
is costing you.

Les

On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 04:26 PM, martingear wrote:

> A new “Gotcha!” to look out for. Hotels have started charging a
> “service charge” (around 15%) on the rental for the function space, and
> they are hiding it in some part of the agreement that is not directly
> related to the function space charges. You may be able to negotiate it
> away or at least a smaller percentage as you are also going to be
> charged for set-ups beyond the initial one, but even if you can’t get
> rid of it, you had better be prepared for it in your budgeting. This
> has just become prevalent in the past couple of years.
>
> Marty
>
> Betsy Delaney wrote:
>
>> Then I think that pretty much answers the question: No, we’ve never
>> had
>> a hotel that didn’t get paid. It just cost us more than we budgeted
>> for
>> on a number of occasions. Now we just need to identify what happened,
>> so
>> we can try to stop the problem from happening again in the future.
>>
>> Agreed?
>>
>>
>
>
> ———————— Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ———————~–>
> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life’s Important
> Questions.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/xX1wlB/TM
> ———————————————————————
> ~->
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Les

Live, never to be ashamed if everything you do is published around the
world. Even if what is published is not true. — Richard Bach

 

Group: runacc Message: 289 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/10/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

We really do need to build the Tucker Inn!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: martingear
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…

A new “Gotcha!” to look out for. Hotels have started charging a
“service charge” (around 15%) on the rental for the function space, and
they are hiding it in some part of the agreement that is not directly
related to the function space charges. You may be able to negotiate it
away or at least a smaller percentage as you are also going to be
charged for set-ups beyond the initial one, but even if you can’t get
rid of it, you had better be prepared for it in your budgeting. This
has just become prevalent in the past couple of years.

Marty

Betsy Delaney wrote:

>Then I think that pretty much answers the question: No, we’ve never had
>a hotel that didn’t get paid. It just cost us more than we budgeted for
>on a number of occasions. Now we just need to identify what happened, so
>we can try to stop the problem from happening again in the future.
>
>Agreed?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 290 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/11/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 02:26 PM, martingear wrote:

> A new “Gotcha!” to look out for. Hotels have started charging a
> “service charge” (around 15%) on the rental for the function space, and
> they are hiding it in some part of the agreement that is not directly
> related to the function space charges. You may be able to negotiate it
> away or at least a smaller percentage as you are also going to be
> charged for set-ups beyond the initial one, but even if you can’t get
> rid of it, you had better be prepared for it in your budgeting. This
> has just become prevalent in the past couple of years.

Well, (and maybe I’m naive) it would be worth getting the hotel to sign
off on a spreadsheet that details all line items including service
charges before signing the final contract. If they sign off and say
there are no service charges, it’s great grounds to have the service
charges stricken from whatever areas they’re hidden in, or ammo to push
the salescritter on other areas if he won’t give up the service charges.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 291 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/17/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

Re-reading this, I recall we sent money to the next 3 CCs. We felt and
obligation, since CC15 had sent us (16) some seed money, as I recall.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:22 PM
Subject: RE: [runacc] Venue question…

> CC17 was one of the conventions which passed a donation on to us from its
> profits, so I would have to assume that their hotel bill was covered.
>
> Eileen
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Trudy Leonard
>
> Did CC17 have problems? I thought I remembered Rob Himmelsbach saying
> something about financial problems with the hotel, but perhaps they got
> settled out OK at the end.
>
> Trudy
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 292 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 6/18/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

We (CC22) received funds from Calgary. Thanks again, guys.

Trudy

>From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Venue question…
>Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:33:25 -0500
>
>Re-reading this, I recall we sent money to the next 3 CCs. We felt and
>obligation, since CC15 had sent us (16) some seed money, as I recall.
>
>Bruce
>
>—– Original Message —–
>From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:22 PM
>Subject: RE: [runacc] Venue question…
>
>
> > CC17 was one of the conventions which passed a donation on to us from
>its
> > profits, so I would have to assume that their hotel bill was covered.
> >
> > Eileen
> >
> > —–Original Message—–
> > From: Trudy Leonard
> >
> > Did CC17 have problems? I thought I remembered Rob Himmelsbach saying
> > something about financial problems with the hotel, but perhaps they got
> > settled out OK at the end.
> >
> > Trudy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 293 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/18/2003
Subject: Re: Venue question…

CCXV sent money (whatever was remaining after paying all bills and
refunding memberships to staff who wished the refunds) to CC16, CC17 and
CC18. As soon as the checks were cashed, and our bank balance was zero,
we closed our bank account and our books. It was the final act in
bookkeeping.

We divided the total amount between the three, roughly evenly.

I don’t know how long the practice continued after CCXV, but it only
made sense to me, since our books were entirely separate from the
GCFCG’s, and we didn’t want to muddy the bookkeeping waters for them,
after the accounting mess from CC3. As we got no cash from the chapter
at all, it seemed the logical thing to do, to keep it in the CC family.

Just an FYI.

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Re-reading this, I recall we sent money to the next 3 CCs. We felt and
> obligation, since CC15 had sent us (16) some seed money, as I recall.
>
> Bruce
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Cliff and Eileen” <capsam@nucleus.com>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:22 PM
> Subject: RE: [runacc] Venue question…
>
> > CC17 was one of the conventions which passed a donation on to us from its
> > profits, so I would have to assume that their hotel bill was covered.
> >
> > Eileen
> >
> > —–Original Message—–
> > From: Trudy Leonard
> >
> > Did CC17 have problems? I thought I remembered Rob Himmelsbach saying
> > something about financial problems with the hotel, but perhaps they got
> > settled out OK at the end.
> >
> > Trudy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 294 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/23/2003
Subject: pass-forward funds…
So this discussion of pass-forward funds has got me thinking…

(between the discussion of CC’s that have passed forward and reading in
my last TorCon PR where they said that they’ve received their
pass-forward funds from ChiCon2k, MilPhil and ConJose)

WorldCon committees commonly have budget line-items for estimated
pass-forward funds to successive cons. Also budget line-items for
membership reimbursements. This allows them to set goals for
pass-forward funds, and gives them a bit of cushion should membership
forecasts go drastically wrong.

Granted, I’ve only seen CCXV’s budget spreadsheets (because that’s all
that’s posted) so this may have started happening in CC budgets
already. If it hasn’t, I think it should. We should be setting goals
for pass-forward funds.

On a tangent, I would like to suggest that we include in the
pass-forward funds a line item to support the Costumers’ Suite at
WorldCon. This is not a convention-run activity. It’s rarely even a
convention-supported activity.

The Costumers’ Suite is (or at least should be) and “embassy to fandom”
for the costume community at WorldCon, and (if well-run) a great venue
to promote Costume-Con. I’m kind of concerned that at TorCon it’s going
to be shuffled off to some hotel other than the main hospitality hotel,
primarily for budget reasons. That’s not something that can be fixed
this year, but it’s something we could help avoid in the future.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 295 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

Uhhhh, Andy, while your ideas are good ones, I’m not real comfortable with
setting “goals” in budgets for what you mention below. Beyond the whole
notion of appearing like having to make a profit (doesnt’ mean we have to be
poor), Things are usually too dicey money-wise , and I don’t want other
cons to feel pressured that they have to make some sort of goal. I’d rather
con-coms make their own decisions.as to how much to give. Expectations
might become an issue.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:58 PM
Subject: [runacc] pass-forward funds…

> So this discussion of pass-forward funds has got me thinking…
>
> (between the discussion of CC’s that have passed forward and reading in
> my last TorCon PR where they said that they’ve received their
> pass-forward funds from ChiCon2k, MilPhil and ConJose)
>
> WorldCon committees commonly have budget line-items for estimated
> pass-forward funds to successive cons. Also budget line-items for
> membership reimbursements. This allows them to set goals for
> pass-forward funds, and gives them a bit of cushion should membership
> forecasts go drastically wrong.
>
> Granted, I’ve only seen CCXV’s budget spreadsheets (because that’s all
> that’s posted) so this may have started happening in CC budgets
> already. If it hasn’t, I think it should. We should be setting goals
> for pass-forward funds.
>
> On a tangent, I would like to suggest that we include in the
> pass-forward funds a line item to support the Costumers’ Suite at
> WorldCon. This is not a convention-run activity. It’s rarely even a
> convention-supported activity.
>
> The Costumers’ Suite is (or at least should be) and “embassy to fandom”
> for the costume community at WorldCon, and (if well-run) a great venue
> to promote Costume-Con. I’m kind of concerned that at TorCon it’s going
> to be shuffled off to some hotel other than the main hospitality hotel,
> primarily for budget reasons. That’s not something that can be fixed
> this year, but it’s something we could help avoid in the future.
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
>
> read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
> read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
> read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
> read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 296 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

At 05:58 PM 6/23/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>We should be setting goals for pass-forward funds.

As CC founder/owner, I don’t think it is prudent to mandate pass-forward funds.

Many CC’s have had NO excess funds after the convention.

Others have chosen to use excess funds for other items benefitting their
own membership, such as CC-6’s Memory Book, which was compiled and mailed
to its members after the convention.

I think there can be some language about suggested ways of using excess
funds, including, but not limited to pass-along funds, but I am STRONGLY
opposed to anything else. As each committee is financially responsible for
their own CC, good or bad, it is NOT OUR BUSINESS to be telling them what
to do with their money. They earned it–it is up to them to decide what to
do with it. Period. If they choose to help out another CC that’s in
financial trouble, or pass forward funds to one or more future CC’s, that’s
really nice, but we cannot force them to do it.

>On a tangent, I would like to suggest that we include in the
>pass-forward funds a line item to support the Costumers’ Suite at
>WorldCon. This is not a convention-run activity. It’s rarely even a
>convention-supported activity.

Andy, I think we need to be taking care of our own business before we are
mandating ANYTHING having to do with WorldCon. Costume-Cons draw most of
their membership from the locality they are held in, with maybe two dozen
people following CC around the country. Therefore, the needs of a
Costume-Con in Moose Crotch, MN are probably NOT filled by sponsoring a
con suite at a WorldCon in Dallas, TX or Miami, FL. [If WorldCon was in
Minneapolis, maybe…]

Also, after 20 years, Costume-Con is still a VERY small convention,
probably averaging 300 members (with highs around 800 and lows around 150).
You are asking for inclusion of budgetary line items better suited for a
large regional. That’s just not practical or affordable for Costume-Con.

>The Costumers’ Suite is (or at least should be) and “embassy to fandom”
>for the costume community at WorldCon, and (if well-run) a great venue
>to promote Costume-Con.

WorldCon is not the be-all and end-all of promoting costuming. We’d be
better off doing “grassroots” marketing (or sponsoring parties) at
conventions in the same geographic area as an upcoming Costume-Con. For
example, I’m pretty sure in stating that CC-22 will probably have more of
its membership derived from the attendees of DragonCon than TorCon.

>I’m kind of concerned that at TorCon it’s going to be shuffled off to some
>hotel other than the main hospitality hotel, primarily for budget reasons.
>That’s not something that can be fixed
>this year, but it’s something we could help avoid in the future.

Andy, plain and simple, Costume-Con cannot afford to be the one “upgrading”
the Costumer’s Suite to the hotel *you* think it should be in. If you want
to pay for it out of your own funds, that’s fine, but Costume-Con doesn’t
have that kind of deep pockets.

I hope I am making myself crystal clear here.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 297 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

I agree. That should be listed (if at all) as a good thing to do, but don’t
lose sight of other needs in the meantime.
Elaine
“Sit potentia tecum”
…..Yoda

> Uhhhh, Andy, while your ideas are good ones, I’m not real comfortable with
> setting “goals” in budgets for what you mention below. Beyond the whole
> notion of appearing like having to make a profit (doesnt’ mean we have to

be

> poor), Things are usually too dicey money-wise , and I don’t want other
> cons to feel pressured that they have to make some sort of goal. I’d

rather

> con-coms make their own decisions.as to how much to give. Expectations
> might become an issue.
>
> Bruce
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
> To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:58 PM
> Subject: [runacc] pass-forward funds…
>
>
> > So this discussion of pass-forward funds has got me thinking…
> >
> > (between the discussion of CC’s that have passed forward and reading in
> > my last TorCon PR where they said that they’ve received their
> > pass-forward funds from ChiCon2k, MilPhil and ConJose)
> >
> > WorldCon committees commonly have budget line-items for estimated
> > pass-forward funds to successive cons. Also budget line-items for
> > membership reimbursements. This allows them to set goals for
> > pass-forward funds, and gives them a bit of cushion should membership
> > forecasts go drastically wrong.
> >
> > Granted, I’ve only seen CCXV’s budget spreadsheets (because that’s all
> > that’s posted) so this may have started happening in CC budgets
> > already. If it hasn’t, I think it should. We should be setting goals
> > for pass-forward funds.
> >
> > On a tangent, I would like to suggest that we include in the
> > pass-forward funds a line item to support the Costumers’ Suite at
> > WorldCon. This is not a convention-run activity. It’s rarely even a
> > convention-supported activity.
> >
> > The Costumers’ Suite is (or at least should be) and “embassy to fandom”
> > for the costume community at WorldCon, and (if well-run) a great venue
> > to promote Costume-Con. I’m kind of concerned that at TorCon it’s going
> > to be shuffled off to some hotel other than the main hospitality hotel,
> > primarily for budget reasons. That’s not something that can be fixed
> > this year, but it’s something we could help avoid in the future.
> >
> > —
> > andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> > San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> > (Kevin’s)
> > “It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
> > –Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel
> >
> > read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
> > read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
> > read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
> > read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> >
> >
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 298 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/24/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 07:27 AM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> At 05:58 PM 6/23/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>> We should be setting goals for pass-forward funds.
>
> As CC founder/owner, I don’t think it is prudent to mandate
> pass-forward funds.

I was imprecise in my phrasing. The “we” I’m speaking of here is “we
concom members,” not “we RunACC folks.” I agree that pass-forward funds
should not be mandated by the constitution or guide.

If a convention committee wishes to give pass-forward funds or do
something else “for the public benefit” it’s a good idea to define
those as line items in the convention’s budget. That makes it much more
likely that such funds will exist when the con is over, and provides a
bit of cushion where the budget can be cut if something drastic happens.

>> On a tangent, I would like to suggest that we include in the
>> pass-forward funds a line item to support the Costumers’ Suite at
>> WorldCon. This is not a convention-run activity. It’s rarely even a
>> convention-supported activity.
>
> Andy, I think we need to be taking care of our own business before we
> are
> mandating ANYTHING having to do with WorldCon.

Again, I’m sorry if I made it look like I’m suggesting mandating
something here. I was thinking more in terms of including it in a list
of uses of “public benefit funds” that concoms could look to for
guidance.

> Costume-Cons draw most of
> their membership from the locality they are held in, with maybe two
> dozen
> people following CC around the country.

I’d set that number a bit higher, 50-100 folks who attend 3-4
Costume-Cons within a 5 year period.

> Therefore, the needs of a
> Costume-Con in Moose Crotch, MN are probably NOT filled by sponsoring
> a
> con suite at a WorldCon in Dallas, TX or Miami, FL. [If WorldCon was in
> Minneapolis, maybe…]

This is true, but it’s also a matter of perspective. There are a lot of
myths and urban legends floating around about Costume-Con, and WorldCon
is not a bad place to address them. There are a lot of costume fans
that travel to every WorldCon, and many of them could afford to travel
to Costume-Con too.

From a purely selfish perspective, it’s the folks who are done who are
giving the donation. They’re probably not bidding another CC for a few
years, so it doesn’t matter to them if they’re supporting something a
continent away.

> Also, after 20 years, Costume-Con is still a VERY small convention,
> probably averaging 300 members (with highs around 800 and lows around
> 150).

It’s hard to make numbers on this; there are so many “?”
membership/attendance figures in the published timeline. I do notice in
the first decade that when CC was in a major metro area memberships
were often above 400, and afterwards it dropped more to the 200 member
range in the same sorts of areas at least from the numbers I can read
or estimate from memory.

> You are asking for inclusion of budgetary line items better suited for
> a
> large regional. That’s just not practical or affordable for
> Costume-Con.

I don’t agree. We’re not talking $20k line items like a WorldCon; we’re
talking $250-500 line items (or whatever the concom thinks is prudent).

>> The Costumers’ Suite is (or at least should be) and “embassy to
>> fandom”
>> for the costume community at WorldCon, and (if well-run) a great venue
>> to promote Costume-Con.
>
> WorldCon is not the be-all and end-all of promoting costuming. We’d be
> better off doing “grassroots” marketing (or sponsoring parties) at
> conventions in the same geographic area as an upcoming Costume-Con. For
> example, I’m pretty sure in stating that CC-22 will probably have more
> of
> its membership derived from the attendees of DragonCon than TorCon.

I’m way ahead of you here. We’re working heavily with local
conventions, hosting parties here and at the cons we travel to. In the
last year we put in an appearance at last year’s Fanime. were landlords
for Costumers’ Suite at ConJose, hosted ConSuite at CC21, and hosted
parties at SiliCon, YaoiCon, FurtherConfusion, Gallifrey (LA), DemiCon
(Des Moines) and BayCon, WesterCon is coming up July 4 weekend, and
we’re going to be having a party there too.

We’re looking beyond the fannish costuming community, though.

We’ve got plans in place to heavily promote within the historical
reenactment organizations and other costume groups. We’ve got 3
imperial coronations and 2 ducal coronations in the Bay Area that we
can walk at as an “in-town organization.” That’s just the beginning of
non-fannish outreach.

>> I’m kind of concerned that at TorCon it’s going to be shuffled off to
>> some
>> hotel other than the main hospitality hotel, primarily for budget
>> reasons.
>> That’s not something that can be fixed
>> this year, but it’s something we could help avoid in the future.
>
> Andy, plain and simple, Costume-Con cannot afford to be the one
> “upgrading”
> the Costumer’s Suite to the hotel *you* think it should be in. If you
> want
> to pay for it out of your own funds, that’s fine, but Costume-Con
> doesn’t
> have that kind of deep pockets.

I’m doing my part.

Last year my Fairmont bill was $3k. I got some donations from folks,
but most of the cost of the Costumers’ Suite at ConJose came out of my
pocket.

This year Kevin and I have committed (I think) C$300 to the suite (cost
of 1 night) and we will continue to support the suite at WorldCons in
the future.

I agree that this kind of thing is something that not every CC could
afford, and not every CC would choose to do, but I still think it’s
something worth keeping on the radar.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 299 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
If the amount to be passed forward to future conventions is a budgeted
amount that a committee tries to meet, there is the possibility that at some
point a convention might have to hold back or even cut spending on extras to
make sure the targeted donations are made.

I would argue that a committee’s first responsibility is to the members who
have paid to support that committee’s convention. It is nice to be able to
pass on any funding that wasn’t needed to other committees, but they should
come last.

If the society formed to hold a CC intends to continue to exist after the CC
is over, the committee may choose to set a policy about how much it may pass
forward, conditional on a profit being made. However I don’t think the
possibility should be allowed to influence decisions about the current CC.
(If a society intends to dissolve after the convention, then all remaining
funds will need to be passed on to someone, regardless of whether there was
a budgeted amount or not.)

Eileen Capes

—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew Trembley

If a convention committee wishes to give pass-forward funds or do
something else “for the public benefit” it’s a good idea to define
those as line items in the convention’s budget. That makes it much more
likely that such funds will exist when the con is over, and provides a
bit of cushion where the budget can be cut if something drastic happens.

 

Group: runacc Message: 300 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/25/2003
Subject: Re: pass-forward funds…
Hi, folks!

I want to clarify something concerning CCXV’s passthrough funds, sent to
CCs 16, 17 and 18:

The decision to clean out the bank account at the conclusion of payment
of everyone was made by the committee, with my primary influence. Our
sponsor, the GCFCG, provided us with a 501(c)(3) umbrella, but no
operating funds whatsoever. While a few of the GCFCG members argued that
we should keep the funds, it was my belief that the funds should be put
back into Costume-Cons, and since I was hearing that the next few were
lower in number than ours was, they could probably use the extra cash. I
was also President of the chapter at the time, and it was finally an
executive decision made to disperse the funds.

We didn’t have a mandate to do so. I think we received a donation from
at least one prior CC, which is where I got the idea to do it. I’d have
to look up the details to know which one gave it to us, but I think it
was one of the CA CCs. The main thing was, we wanted to zero out our
bank account.

History Lesson: The GCFCG had a big problem at the time the ICG was
incorporated (just prior to 1992), because of its original status as the
founding ICG chapter as well as sponsor of CC3. The con made so much
extra money, the IRS had a problem believing the chapter was non-profit.
It took years (and an expensive accountant bill) to straighten out the
finances as a result.

We didn’t want to cause any questions to happen with the IRS. The con
pulled in just over 20k over the entire course of its existence, but not
all in the same year, and we very carefully documented where every penny
went.

I had hoped to start a tradition, but I don’t know how long it lasted. I
know that at least CC16 passed on some funds, and I understand that CC19
did as well. Without the financial records/budgets from the other CCs, I
don’t know for sure what happened with the rest.

If we do address the subject in the Run a CC document, it should be as
historic data (what other con coms have done) and not as a requirement.
We certainly didn’t budget for the funds. I was hoping there would be
more, but an expensive hotel bill and extra video editing requirements
put paid to the largest quantity of profits. We were lucky we had the
extra to pass forward, in the end.

Note: I’m finishing with putting the Summer issue of The ICG Newsletter
sometime this weekend/early next week. I just finished labeling all the
envelopes – now have to collate and fold all the copies (some 550 or
so). When I’m done, I plan to spend time looking at the outline on the
site with an eye to making the changes we discussed at the meeting at
CC21. I would really appreciate feedback about this subject in
particular, so we can get to writing the content. I can write a lot of
it, but I’m not expecting to write everything!

Hint.

Thanks!

Talk to you soon,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 5 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 5 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 201 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served
Group: runacc Message: 202 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 203 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 204 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served
Group: runacc Message: 205 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Space assignments and other things of note.
Group: runacc Message: 206 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Space assignments and other things of note.
Group: runacc Message: 207 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Exhibits/Dealers (was Re: Dealers Room)
Group: runacc Message: 208 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room
Group: runacc Message: 209 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room
Group: runacc Message: 210 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet
Group: runacc Message: 211 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Space assignments and other things of note.
Group: runacc Message: 212 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Newbies
Group: runacc Message: 213 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet
Group: runacc Message: 214 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies
Group: runacc Message: 215 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies
Group: runacc Message: 216 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet
Group: runacc Message: 217 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 218 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 219 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 220 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 221 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 222 From: Les Roth Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 223 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies stuff from Tina
Group: runacc Message: 224 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/23/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 225 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/23/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room and discussion progress
Group: runacc Message: 226 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/25/2003
Subject: photography
Group: runacc Message: 227 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/26/2003
Subject: Re: photography
Group: runacc Message: 228 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/26/2003
Subject: Re: photography
Group: runacc Message: 229 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: photography – more comments
Group: runacc Message: 230 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: photography
Group: runacc Message: 231 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 232 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/28/2003
Subject: Re: photography
Group: runacc Message: 233 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 234 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 235 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Costume-ConNections going down momentarily. Drum roll, please!
Group: runacc Message: 236 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 237 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 238 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 239 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Draft invite/job description for CC26 Bid Committee members
Group: runacc Message: 240 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 241 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Group: runacc Message: 242 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: DRAFT monthly reminder
Group: runacc Message: 243 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: Oh, just to clarify…
Group: runacc Message: 244 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/1/2003
Subject: Drum roll, please! Costume-ConNections Relaunched!
Group: runacc Message: 245 From: Tina Connell Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Fabric dealer (re: dealers room discussion a couple of weeks ago)
Group: runacc Message: 246 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 247 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 248 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 249 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
Group: runacc Message: 250 From: betsy Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 201 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served

Most of the juried dealer’s rooms I’ve come across have been to avoid
duplication in products, not to keep out non-themed dealers.

When we were in the clown world, most conventions limited their dealer
rooms to two of any given type of dealer. So: two shoe dealers tops, two
costume dealers tops, two wig dealers tops, etc. This SUCKED for us,
because we were a costume company on a convention circuit where there were
already two established costume companies that were deeply entrenched at
the lion’s share of conventions. There were also conventions where we were
not allowed to sell socks, or wigs, or shoes, or whatever subset of our
regular inventory, because those “rights” were held by another dealer for
that convention. That sucked, too, as we were diversified in order to
maximize our potential earnings at any given convention.

I would like to see Costume-Con avoid the kind of dealer politics we
encountered on a regular basis in the clown world. (One of the many reasons
we are NOT on the clown convention circuit any more.)

I would like to see Costume-Con handle its dealers the way other
professional trade shows do: You pay your money, and you get a space. If
you pay late, you might not end up with quite the space you wanted (up
against a wall vs. out on the floor; next to your friends, whatever), or a
space at all. No politics. No preferential treatment.

Sorry, but speaking as someone who’s been out in the trenches for 10+
years, this is a “hot button” for me.

–Karen

At 11:50 AM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>The reason that we went with the juried approach was to eliminate dealers
>with the table full of action figures and ones with stuff that wasn’t
>costuming orientated. We felt that this was fair to the dealers, who want to
>make money, and the attendees.
>Henry Osier
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 202 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Here’s my problem. We are in a very small convention center. Bigggg
ballroom, nice sized rooms on either side that can be split in two or made
one decent sized room (Dealer’s room and workshops/greenroom) and a small
theatre. I can also close off the back half of the ballroom for workshops,
dances, etc. during the day. That’s it, guys. We also have use of the hotel
boardroom, which is on the other side of the building from the main
convention area, which we had considered setting up as a “stitch’n bitch”
area. The room that I might be able to get for Janet would be off the hotel
lobby, not the convention center lobby, and was a small cafe at one time, so
it has booths and tables in it (which might not be bad for displaying
stuff). I could put the dolls and costume displays in the boardroom, but the
traffic might not be that great, and it would require a constant attendant.
We had the tradeoff of having the convention in an area with plenty of
amenities and have a somewhat small space (but that we have all of), or
having it in a gigantohotel downtown, where they charge $18 a day to park,
we’d be sharing with lots of other folks, and it’s not a place you really
want to walk around in a lot.

Trudy

>From: “Tina Connell” <cvconnel@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room
>Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:16:25 -0400
>
>Well, for starters, what would Janet think about being put in a room away
>from the other dealers’ room? Or are you saying that there is a larger
>room off the lobby which would accommodate bothe Alter Years and the other
>dealers as well? Off the lobby could have its advantages. BTW, I looked
>pretty closely at the books offered by both Poison Pen and Alter Years (as
>did Byron) and there really wasn’t a lot of overlap. It was nice having
>the extra variety. I bought books from both of them. And speaking of
>variety, FABRIC! We hardly ever see it in dealers rooms. If you can get a
>fabric dealer in, that would be a good thing! (Assuming the dealer has
>decent stuff.)
>
>Incidentally, if I were making the decision I wouldn’t put the dolls in
>Dealers. Too much chance for them to get damaged, and if they’re near a
>popular dealer, not very accessible after all.
>
>Tina
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Trudy Leonard
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room
>
>
>
> I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has
> indicated an interest in bring her truck full of stuff to Atlanta. At
>the
> moment, I don’t really have anywhere to put her. Our space is at a
>premium.
> Even though we have the entire convention area, it ain’t that big. I
>can
> fit 14 tables and the doll exhibit into our dealer’s room. I could fit
>more
> if I put tables down the middle of the room, but I am hoping to have
>enough
> space for people to move comfortably. There is another space that I
>might
> be able to get from the hotel, but it won’t be in the convention area,
>but
> will be just off the hotel lobby. I would love for the folks here who
>don’t
> have access to a G Street, or Alter Years or some other source for all
>the
> historical patterns, accessories, etc, to have a chance to buy some of
>these
> things. On the other hand, Poison Pen is already booked as one of the
> dealers, and I hate to lessen her sales (even if it is “business”).
>
> I’m not too keen on the “selling out of a hotel room” idea. I don’t
>think
> you would do as well if folks had to find you and not have you right
>there
> in the traffic flow. One of the reasons, besides space, that we are
>putting
> the dolls in the dealers room is to increase the traffic for both.
>
> Trudy
>
> >From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
> >Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:15:03 -0500
> >
> >This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of
>you.
> >
> >Henry:
> >
> >Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> >dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason
>feels
> >very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if
>she’s
> >willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not?
>How
> >important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much
>she
> >brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables
>inherently
> >fair?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 203 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

I don’t think Janet would have a problem being away from the other dealers
if it means she gets the kind of space she needs (but you’d have to ask
her). AlterYears is always a draw, so I think your convention attendees
will find her no matter where you put her. Are the boardroom and cafe of
comparable size, and would it make sense to swap AlterYears and the
dolls/exhibits?
Or put out the call for volunteers to sit at the entrance of the exhibits
in 2- or 3-hour shifts so it is constantly attended?

–Karen

At 02:25 PM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Here’s my problem. We are in a very small convention center. Bigggg
>ballroom, nice sized rooms on either side that can be split in two or made
>one decent sized room (Dealer’s room and workshops/greenroom) and a small
>theatre. I can also close off the back half of the ballroom for workshops,
>dances, etc. during the day. That’s it, guys. We also have use of the hotel
>boardroom, which is on the other side of the building from the main
>convention area, which we had considered setting up as a “stitch’n bitch”
>area. The room that I might be able to get for Janet would be off the hotel
>lobby, not the convention center lobby, and was a small cafe at one time, so
>it has booths and tables in it (which might not be bad for displaying
>stuff). I could put the dolls and costume displays in the boardroom, but the
>traffic might not be that great, and it would require a constant attendant.
>We had the tradeoff of having the convention in an area with plenty of
>amenities and have a somewhat small space (but that we have all of), or
>having it in a gigantohotel downtown, where they charge $18 a day to park,
>we’d be sharing with lots of other folks, and it’s not a place you really
>want to walk around in a lot.
>
>Trudy
> >From: “Tina Connell” <cvconnel@nycap.rr.com>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room
> >Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:16:25 -0400
> >
> >Well, for starters, what would Janet think about being put in a room away
> >from the other dealers’ room? Or are you saying that there is a larger
> >room off the lobby which would accommodate bothe Alter Years and the other
> >dealers as well? Off the lobby could have its advantages. BTW, I looked
> >pretty closely at the books offered by both Poison Pen and Alter Years (as
> >did Byron) and there really wasn’t a lot of overlap. It was nice having
> >the extra variety. I bought books from both of them. And speaking of
> >variety, FABRIC! We hardly ever see it in dealers rooms. If you can get a
> >fabric dealer in, that would be a good thing! (Assuming the dealer has
> >decent stuff.)
> >
> >Incidentally, if I were making the decision I wouldn’t put the dolls in
> >Dealers. Too much chance for them to get damaged, and if they’re near a
> >popular dealer, not very accessible after all.
> >
> >Tina
> > —– Original Message —–
> > From: Trudy Leonard
> > To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has
> > indicated an interest in bring her truck full of stuff to Atlanta. At
> >the
> > moment, I don’t really have anywhere to put her. Our space is at a
> >premium.
> > Even though we have the entire convention area, it ain’t that big. I
> >can
> > fit 14 tables and the doll exhibit into our dealer’s room. I could fit
> >more
> > if I put tables down the middle of the room, but I am hoping to have
> >enough
> > space for people to move comfortably. There is another space that I
> >might
> > be able to get from the hotel, but it won’t be in the convention area,
> >but
> > will be just off the hotel lobby. I would love for the folks here who
> >don’t
> > have access to a G Street, or Alter Years or some other source for all
> >the
> > historical patterns, accessories, etc, to have a chance to buy some of
> >these
> > things. On the other hand, Poison Pen is already booked as one of the
> > dealers, and I hate to lessen her sales (even if it is “business”).
> >
> > I’m not too keen on the “selling out of a hotel room” idea. I don’t
> >think
> > you would do as well if folks had to find you and not have you right
> >there
> > in the traffic flow. One of the reasons, besides space, that we are
> >putting
> > the dolls in the dealers room is to increase the traffic for both.
> >
> > Trudy
> >
> > >From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> > >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
> > >Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:15:03 -0500
> > >
> > >This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of
> >you.
> > >
> > >Henry:
> > >
> > >Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> > >dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason
> >feels
> > >very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if
> >she’s
> > >willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not?
> >How
> > >important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much
> >she
> > >brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables
> >inherently
> > >fair?
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > >Bruce
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> > >
> > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 204 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served

In a message dated 5/20/2003 12:16:14 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> I don’t think any Costume-Con has ever had non-costuming oriented dealers
> apply for space.

We did.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 205 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Space assignments and other things of note.
Some general thoughts on space allotments, including Dealer areas and
exhibits…

1. At CC9, not only were the exhibits in the dealer room, but so were
the dolls. Dealers were in the perimiter, and exhibits took up the
center of the room. Ricky, am I remembering correctly that you were
involved in the dealer room then?

I was a dealer at the time, and had a table or two. I was also the
exhibit coordinator. I recall (again, perhaps incorrectly) that there
wasn’t a flow issue, since the dealer space was sufficiently big enough,
for people to look at the dolls and costumes in the room. Since the
space was shared, security was limited to a single space. OTOH, we had
to borrow/rent stanchions (uprights with rope) to keep people from
wandering too close to costumes on display. Several of the people who
loaned costumes for exhibit required this, and were fairly unhappy until
I assured them that we would have protection for the space. Also of note
(while I’m thinking about it), we had to insure the space as well, to
get some of the costumes we did for display.

2. At CCXV, the dolls were in their own separate room from both the
dealers and the exhibits. The dealer area was in Versailles, off the
main lobby. The dealer space was very tight, and had to be redrawn at
the absolute last minute, because we didn’t have the firecode
information available when the first dealer room coordinator drew out
the plan. I recall that it took three tries for an equitable layout that
didn’t block essential doors in the room. I don’t recall comments
concerning the doll space. I do know that the space was way
underutilized.

Timeless Textiles was indeed there, and did a bang-up job of sales. We
sold space on a first come-first served basis, and I marketed the space
very heavily after our original coordinator bailed out. There was only
one issue with set-up location inside the room (making sure similar
goods weren’t sitting right next to each other). Security slept in the
room overnight. The doll contest room was locked each night, and the
entire program floor, which was only available by elevator, was also
locked off in the evening, but also (I think) had security sleeping
over.

I think we had a couple of dealers who were interested in selling
weapons (not exactly costume), and I don’t know how they did after all
that. I can honestly say that I didn’t spend much time in the dealer
area after everyone got set up (I delegated that responsibility as soon
as I could), until Monday, and then only after I got mad during the
annual meeting.

3. Were I to do it again, I would strongly recommend the first come,
first served method for selecting dealers, for one real good reason: A
dealer in the hand is worth a considerable amount of money, especially
if the cost of tables is part of how you’re paying for the space.

We were supposed to have several other rooms set aside for “corporate
sponsors” to have all to themselves. The theory was that we could get
someone like Bernina, or a pattern company, to display in that single,
exclusive, room. They could bring as much as they wanted to display, and
do whatever they wanted in the room. For the privilege, they were paying
an extra amount. I’d have to dig through my pre-con paperwork to
remember exactly what we wanted to get for that privilege, but $300-400
seems like the right figure. I believe the tables were $125 each, or
something similar.

I don’t recall if we were successful in pushing the sponsor space. I
still need to boil down the data from the con paperwork to publish on
the site, and that’s going to wait a little. I recall that it wasn’t
particularly useful, and that we wound up using one of the set-aside
rooms for something else in the long run.

4. Several things I might have done differently concerning CC21’s
layout:

a. I think I would have swapped the Registration and the Ops room, to
put registration a lot closer to the action. I might also have moved the
other activities being handled inside of Registration to the hallway
outside, on folding tables. In that room were: Information, Site
Selection, Masquerade Registration and the Costume-Con Archives spaces.
It created a real flow problem, especially at the height of masquerade
registration. Too much chaos!

And when the room closed permanently, early on Sunday because
registration was over, I had to move all my Archives stuff to the
counter on the other side of the hall from Ops anyway. Plus which, that
meant the room was unusable after registration closed.

Just another comment, concerning fan tables: I was also expecting Carl
to have a space for his ICG Archives, but I gather that this never
actually materialized. If it did, I never figured out where the display
ended up. And there wasn’t enough room in the registration space to
allow for it. There also wasn’t enough space for future CC con coms to
set up membership sales tables during the con.

b. I would probably have swapped one of the meeting spaces above ground
with the exhibits and doll contest, placing them a lot closer to the
dealer area. Workshops could easily have shifted into the room where the
exhibits were housed, and would not necessarily have suffered for it.

In general, the flow issue is a fairly big one. Keeping that flow
logical and cohesive makes it easier for people to find what they’re
looking for, especially if they’re new to CCs and already bewildered.

5. PROVIDE A MAP!!! In the Program Book! Please! With spaces identified,
clearly marked, so that people can find what they’re looking for. And
have signs printed well in advance of arrival, so that they can be
posted as soon as the con com arrive on the scene.

There’s more to come, but this is enough for now…..

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 206 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Space assignments and other things of note.

Betsy,

You’re right about CC-9.
I ran both in the room, exhibits and dealers.

Of course it was a pretty nifty trick that one of the dealers just happened
to be the exhibit person. YOU LOL!

so that made everybodys life easier.

That was the con where dealers that had never sent in money or anything,
just showed up, as they are/were staples of all Baltimore cons.
yikes.

I played shape shifter and through some quantum mechanics changed the size
and the shape of the room, but we got them in.
Trouble for me to be sure, but the con chairs sure liked me handing them
more money on opening day
Byron mentioned not combining things into one room so you can get the $$
for more tables, true, but it’s a matter of how much space is even
available to you.

well either way, it’s how many tables can you sell, and how can they pay
for other con space.
In columbia for sure, extra display space was limited , so merging the two
was the only way.

AT other hotels if space is cheap, then you can have three seperate rooms
if you want.

This goes to Trudy’s dilema.
Limited space, and the need for dealers, dolls, and exhibits.
and I hope somehow, everyone will know that she has this trouble, because
she was trying to keep the attendees costs down.
I mean, 18 dollars parking,if we were in the city, well for Canadians,
thats like a months pay or something.;-)

You just have to decide what percentage of available space you want for the
3 things.

once you decide on your dealers percentage ( whatever it is) you figure out
how many tables that will fit.
Thats life, thats all you got. Unless after the math, you decide to do less
something and more dealers cause cash flow is never a bad thing.

now, what is that space costing you.
lets say you put the dolls in the room for info and reg, makeing the
assumption that every body goes there at least once or twice over the
weekend, so it’ll be cool.

then your dealers and exhibits need to share space.

pretty simple.
take the cost of the room and divide it by the number of tables for dealers
you want to sell.
you need to charge that much or more.

now, you can be nice and throw in a reg with it to take the sting out if
you want, but you don’t have to.
This is supply and demand. they want to come, they pay.

If you find an extra area you want to use for a special dealer. I have no
problem with that.
just be sure to charge them at least what the hotel wants from you.

so they want 500.00 for the weekend for the old cafe space.
Alteryears needs to pay at least that.
they could get away with only paying that, cause it’s off the beaten track,
no one was going to use it anyway, etc… instead of my usual rule of pay
double what the space cost.

On the other hand, I wonder with booths and tables what displays or dolls
would be like in there……..

The tough thing about dealers room is this,

How do we balance the need and knowledge that they and we are a business,
and tough decisions need to be made on a worth it financially basis, with
the other side, how much of the dealers being there is us as a con com
doing a service to our attendees.

Thats where it gets tricky, and thats where the supply and demand thing
needs to be addressed again.
Henry and Kym had too many people for the availible space. so they didn’t
take the action figure people.

COOL!

>

but let me tell you, if I go into a hotel, and I have so much space I can’t
fill it, it’s gonna get filled with whomever has the check book.
I would never pick action figures over fabric, but if I had a huge empty
second ballroom for dealers for some reason?
well, anybody can come and take their chances, and I can use that extra
cash to fill the con suite or something.

Ricky

At 06:29 PM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Some general thoughts on space allotments, including Dealer areas and
>exhibits…
>
>1. At CC9, not only were the exhibits in the dealer room, but so were
>the dolls. Dealers were in the perimiter, and exhibits took up the
>center of the room. Ricky, am I remembering correctly that you were
>involved in the dealer room then?
>
>I was a dealer at the time, and had a table or two. I was also the
>exhibit coordinator. I recall (again, perhaps incorrectly) that there
>wasn’t a flow issue, since the dealer space was sufficiently big enough,
>for people to look at the dolls and costumes in the room. Since the
>space was shared, security was limited to a single space. OTOH, we had
>to borrow/rent stanchions (uprights with rope) to keep people from
>wandering too close to costumes on display. Several of the people who
>loaned costumes for exhibit required this, and were fairly unhappy until
>I assured them that we would have protection for the space. Also of note
>(while I’m thinking about it), we had to insure the space as well, to
>get some of the costumes we did for display.
>
>2. At CCXV, the dolls were in their own separate room from both the
>dealers and the exhibits. The dealer area was in Versailles, off the
>main lobby. The dealer space was very tight, and had to be redrawn at
>the absolute last minute, because we didn’t have the firecode
>information available when the first dealer room coordinator drew out
>the plan. I recall that it took three tries for an equitable layout that
>didn’t block essential doors in the room. I don’t recall comments
>concerning the doll space. I do know that the space was way
>underutilized.
>
>Timeless Textiles was indeed there, and did a bang-up job of sales. We
>sold space on a first come-first served basis, and I marketed the space
>very heavily after our original coordinator bailed out. There was only
>one issue with set-up location inside the room (making sure similar
>goods weren’t sitting right next to each other). Security slept in the
>room overnight. The doll contest room was locked each night, and the
>entire program floor, which was only available by elevator, was also
>locked off in the evening, but also (I think) had security sleeping
>over.
>
>I think we had a couple of dealers who were interested in selling
>weapons (not exactly costume), and I don’t know how they did after all
>that. I can honestly say that I didn’t spend much time in the dealer
>area after everyone got set up (I delegated that responsibility as soon
>as I could), until Monday, and then only after I got mad during the
>annual meeting.
>
>3. Were I to do it again, I would strongly recommend the first come,
>first served method for selecting dealers, for one real good reason: A
>dealer in the hand is worth a considerable amount of money, especially
>if the cost of tables is part of how you’re paying for the space.
>
>We were supposed to have several other rooms set aside for “corporate
>sponsors” to have all to themselves. The theory was that we could get
>someone like Bernina, or a pattern company, to display in that single,
>exclusive, room. They could bring as much as they wanted to display, and
>do whatever they wanted in the room. For the privilege, they were paying
>an extra amount. I’d have to dig through my pre-con paperwork to
>remember exactly what we wanted to get for that privilege, but $300-400
>seems like the right figure. I believe the tables were $125 each, or
>something similar.
>
>I don’t recall if we were successful in pushing the sponsor space. I
>still need to boil down the data from the con paperwork to publish on
>the site, and that’s going to wait a little. I recall that it wasn’t
>particularly useful, and that we wound up using one of the set-aside
>rooms for something else in the long run.
>
>4. Several things I might have done differently concerning CC21’s
>layout:
>
> a. I think I would have swapped the Registration and the Ops room, to
>put registration a lot closer to the action. I might also have moved the
>other activities being handled inside of Registration to the hallway
>outside, on folding tables. In that room were: Information, Site
>Selection, Masquerade Registration and the Costume-Con Archives spaces.
>It created a real flow problem, especially at the height of masquerade
>registration. Too much chaos!
>
>And when the room closed permanently, early on Sunday because
>registration was over, I had to move all my Archives stuff to the
>counter on the other side of the hall from Ops anyway. Plus which, that
>meant the room was unusable after registration closed.
>
>Just another comment, concerning fan tables: I was also expecting Carl
>to have a space for his ICG Archives, but I gather that this never
>actually materialized. If it did, I never figured out where the display
>ended up. And there wasn’t enough room in the registration space to
>allow for it. There also wasn’t enough space for future CC con coms to
>set up membership sales tables during the con.
>
> b. I would probably have swapped one of the meeting spaces above
> ground
>with the exhibits and doll contest, placing them a lot closer to the
>dealer area. Workshops could easily have shifted into the room where the
>exhibits were housed, and would not necessarily have suffered for it.
>
>
>In general, the flow issue is a fairly big one. Keeping that flow
>logical and cohesive makes it easier for people to find what they’re
>looking for, especially if they’re new to CCs and already bewildered.
>
>5. PROVIDE A MAP!!! In the Program Book! Please! With spaces identified,
>clearly marked, so that people can find what they’re looking for. And
>have signs printed well in advance of arrival, so that they can be
>posted as soon as the con com arrive on the scene.
>
>There’s more to come, but this is enough for now…..
>
>Cheers,
>
>Betsy
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 207 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Exhibits/Dealers (was Re: Dealers Room)

Except to say what you just did about the alternate effects.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:57 PM
Subject: [runacc] Exhibits/Dealers (was Re: Dealers Room)

If there’s tons of space, putting exhibits in the same room as dealers
can increase traffic through exhibits, and that’s a good thing. If
space is tight, putting exhibits in the same room as dealers will
result in confusion and a traffic jam, which is a bad thing.

I don’t think this is something we can answer in anything more than the
vaguest terms in our CC Runner’s Guide.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 208 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room

I didn’t like it. Granted, we had quality dealers, but I would rather not
let the selection of which dealers to sell space to be open for discussion
by the whole staff. Surely there must be a better way.

I’ve never been involved in running a dealers’ room (and don’t want to
volunteer!) so I have no suggestions. Sorry. However, Devra (Poison Pen
Press) has run the Lunacon dealers’ room for a while now, and might be
willing to share some of her knowledge with us.

Elaine

>
> As a self-employed businessperson (as most dealers are), money is always
> tight. There was NO WAY I was going to pay for dealer space in advance and
> then wait *months* for the committee to decide if I actually could vend at
> the con or not.
>
> Anybody else have thoughts on a “juried” vs. “first come, first served”
> approach?

 

Group: runacc Message: 209 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room

Gee, I never considered “jury-ing” the dealers room. I just want to have
dealers. I might warn someone if they are carrying the same sort of stuff as
someone that I already have and let them decide if they still want to come,
but, at this point, I don’t think that I’d turn someone down. Our natural
limiter will be space.

Trudy

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers’ Room
>Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:45:26 -0400
>
>The only thing I didn’t like about the CC-21 dealer’s room took place
>before the con: the “juried” method of selecting dealers.
>
>As a self-employed businessperson (as most dealers are), money is always
>tight. There was NO WAY I was going to pay for dealer space in advance and
>then wait *months* for the committee to decide if I actually could vend at
>the con or not.
>
>Anybody else have thoughts on a “juried” vs. “first come, first served”
>approach?
>
>–Karen
>
>At 11:33 AM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >Hello!
> > I got this response from Kyym Kimple, the guy who ran our
>Dealers’
> >Room at CC21.
> > Henry Osier
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 210 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet
Some good info here, and thanks to Henry /Kyym for the feedback. Does
anyone
else have any other thoughts reagarding fairness, Janet, space, etc.? And
just out of curiosity, are there any other large dealers in the same league
with Janet?

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 211 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Space assignments and other things of note.
FWIIW –
My rule of thumb has been the same as Ricky’s i.e. if someone is going
to be in a position to make money then the charge should be twice the
actual space cost so that they can help to pay for the money pit that is
a fan run con. For profit cons like Creations and DragonCon, charge
quite a bit more both for memberships and for dealers.

I seem to recall that for CC-3 the upper ballroom was about half dealer
tables and half exhibits so the table cost was the room rental divided
by the number of tables. I’m sure that someone will correct me if I am
not remembering correctly.

^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 212 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Newbies
I tried sending this as an attachmentb but Yahoo stripped it off. I think my second attempt may have only gone to Les, in response to his note. Let’s try it again.

This is somewhat dated, at least the info regarding sound media for presentations, and also doesn’t cover a lot of things, but I was trying, at CC18, to give a quick overview of the costume competition situation that might help a real newbie. At this year’s CC, there were a couple of total novices in the Green Room who were getting serious cold feet at the idea of going on stage (they had nice costumes). I especially tried to address the myth of the stand-offish big-shot costumer (as in, they’re not stuck up, they’re simply jet lagged, hungry and nervous about their presentation later in the con). It was also necessary to get it onto a single piece of paper – “War & Peace” would just scare them off. Frankly, a nice little handbook for newbies would be a nice thing to have as a handout not just at CC’s, but also at the Masq. sign-up desk at other cons. Not just the stuff below, but also a brief and not overly technical description of the tech side of things. Because I primarily do Green Room, I’m a bit vague on Stage Right/Stage Left and lighting options other than Fred, myself (and “Fred” should be explained as well, both the tech “Fred” and “The Ambassador from the planet Fred”). The more accessible we make things, the more new blood we are apt to attract.

Tina

Frequently Asked Questions: A brief primer for the new (and not-so-new) costumer

I’m new to this. I feel really nervous about…

… appearing in costume on stage.

A: We all had to start sometime. Yes, it can be scary going up on stage the first few times. Probably, every person you see up there felt that way at first (some of them who have been doing costumes for years still feel that way), but try to remember that you’re among friends at this convention.

… talking to these strangers in costume, talking to experienced costumers who may look down on me as a newbie, etc.

A: Costume fans are one of the friendliest groups of people around. Most of them love to talk to other people about costuming and costumes, especially their own costumes. On the other hand, don’t decide that someone is terminally stuck-up if they don’t want to talk to you just then: they may be on a serious sleep deficit, need caffeine or food desperately, be jet-lagged and not feeling very functional, or they may just be really, seriously, nervous about their presentation a bit later in the con and have a major set of butterflies distracting them. Just as you sometimes don’t feel like talking to people, you may also be catching the other person at a bad time.

… competing against more experienced costumers.

A: This is why the Division system was created. What is the Division system, you may ask? It is a means of separating the new or inexperienced costumers from the more experienced costumers, for purposes of judging. The judges (and audience) will recognize that a Novice costumer is likely to have less experience, and (in some cases) less well honed skills than a Journeyman, Craftsman, or Master costumer. Novices are judged in relation to other Novices, Journeymen in relation to Journeymen, and so forth. A Novice costume is not an inferior costume — on a number of occasions, Novice costumes have won Best In Show, over costumes made and presented by experienced Masters.

What do all of these things regarding the Masquerades/Competitions mean?

What is the tech (technical) rehearsal and why do I have to go to it?:

A: The tech rehearsal is very important to you. At many larger conventions, and definitely at WorldCon or Costume-Con, it is required for all entrants. It ensures that you actually see the stage you will be appearing on. Hopefully, you will also Awalk@ the stage, as well. If you have a “feel” for the space you will have available, your presentation will look better, and you are less likely to fall off the front, back or side of the stage — this is also a safety factor.

The “tech” crew really want to make you look good on stage. Unfortunately, this is harder if they have no idea what you have in mind. By going to the tech rehearsal, you will have a chance to explain to them what you want to do in terms of sound (if you brought a sound effects tape), lighting, and any other special effects they may have available. They may even make suggestions that could make your costume or presentation look better.

The MC (Master of Ceremonies/Narrator), who will be announcing your costume, will also be there. You will have a chance to talk to him or her about your presentation. If your costume introduction text has any exotic words in it, you should plan to spell them out phonetically for the MC. Any text you want read should be CLEARLY printed or typed.

Above all, no matter how much you want to surprise the audience and your fellow costumers, never, ever, surprise the masquerade director. He or she will not divulge anything about your planned presentation, but the director needs to know about anything that may be unusual or potentially unsafe. This includes things like flash powder, smoke bombs, fog machines, stuff you plan to throw around on the stage, etc., as well as any unusual props (accessories) or weapons, or unusual moves (such as leaping off the stage). Note: throwing objects out at the judges and audience is a no-no!

What is the Green Room?

A: The Green Room is the backstage area where the contestants gather as they prepare to go on stage. Check-in time usually is at least two hours before the expected curtain time. The costumers can finish getting into their costumes (if they haven=t already done so in their rooms), test their props one last time, and maybe put on or touch up their makeup. Contestants should not bring friends or family members (especially children) backstage, unless they are also going to be on stage B the Green Room is chaotic enough as it is without non-contestants milling about! Contestants are grouped in “dens,” with a Den Mom or Den Dad, who helps the costumers in his or her group. This may include helping you get into your costume, trying to calm jittery nerves, fetching water/snacks for you if your costume is bulky or awkward to get around in, and generally doing his/her best to make sure you are ready to go on stage and look great! The Green Room Manager is the overall backstage person who keeps the chaos from getting out of hand. He or she keeps track of which costumes have checked in (or not checked in yet), and makes sure that the “dens” go up on stage in the proper sequence.

Also customary in the Green Room (at least at larger conventions) is a Repair Table. It offers basic equipment to effect repairs to a costume which has developed problems. It is not there for the purpose of building/assembling/creating your costume — it is only for repairs. Typically, the repair table offers needles, threads of various colors, safety pins, bobby pins, hot glue guns, small hand tools such as pliers, adhesives, tapes, string and wire, etc., and may also include a makeup mirror and some basic makeup repair materials (again, this is for repairs or touch-ups, not to create a full makeup job). For

(Over ¸ ¸)

health/sanitary reasons, you should plan to bring your own special colors of lipstick and eye makeup. Sometimes the repair table person will have some experience with stage makeup, but you cannot rely upon this for sure. Please note: the equipment and supplies on the repair table are usually the personal property of the person at the repair table, who has kindly donated the use of them to the con; you should make every effort to return tools, etc. when you are finished using them.

Stage Aninjas@ will help you get on and off of the stage safely. If you hear someone out there in the dark say ASTOP!@, or feel a slap on your leg or ankle as you are about to leave the stage, you should stop. It probably means that you aren=t lined up for the stairs and were about to fall off the stage, because the lights were in your eyes. When you walk the stage during tech rehearsal, check to see about how many steps you can take forward (or backward) safely.

What is Workmanship Judging? Do I have to be judged for Workmanship?

A: The workmanship judge does exactly that. He or she gets “up close and personal,” looking at the special details, such as applique, beadwork, leather or metalwork, special design and construction of interest, and the many other facets that comprise superior workmanship on a costume. You do not have to present yourself to the workmanship judge. However, if there is some aspect of your costume that you feel exhibits special workmanship or ingenuity on your part, this is your opportunity to have it recognized. You do not need to have your entire costume judged for workmanship — you may elect to have just a tiny facet of your costume judged — a beaded bodice, a lovingly-hand-hammered breastplate, the cleverly designed mechanism you invented to make your wings open and close, or the gloves or shoes you made from scratch. If your costume is held together with spit and baling wire, don’t even consider it! If there are bits of detail you are really proud of, you definitely should give workmanship judging serious consideration.

What should I do about a sound track?

A: Hopefully, you already gave this some thought before you arrived at the con. The perfect bit of music can help to “make” a so-so costume, just as a poor choice of music can be jarring and may detract from an otherwise great presentation. Preferably, your sound should be on tape, not CD, for ease of cueing. It should not be recorded in “stereo” (right side different from left side), as the sound system available may not be able to play both Atracks@ — you might end up with a vital bit of your sound un-played. It should be clearly labeled with your name and your costume’s title. It should also be labeled “right side” and “wrong side”, so the tech knows which side of the tape has your sound on — there=s nothing worse than going out on stage expecting music or voice-over, only to find that your tape got put in upside down because of poor labeling. (The easiest way to avoid this is to record your sound on both sides of the tape.) The tape you hand in to the masquerade director should be already cued-up (on the Aright@ side) to the point at which you want it to start. It is best to start with a clean tape, rather than taping over an old one (which could lead to embarrassing bits of inappropriate sound-track). Put on it just what you need for your presentation, rather than an entire song/piece of music, to also ensure that what you want will be played. If your tape is properly labeled, it should be easy to get it back to you after the masquerade. If you didn’t bring a tape with you, sometimes “tech” can help you out — frequently, they have a variety of suitable sound bits that they can play, if you work with them (see “Tech Rehearsal,” above).

What’s all this about “Presentation”?

A: How you look and move on stage helps you show your costume to the audience and judges, and helps to convey the costume=s mood or story. Yes, you can just walk on stage, and then walk off the other side, but this won=t show off the work you put into your costume (see also, Tech Rehearsal – walking the stage). Your movements on stage should be planned to let the judges and audience see the back of the costume as well as the front, and show off any special decoration or details. At the very least, plan to move in a circle on stage, to show the back and sides of your costume as well as the front. Stay in character: if you’re a warrior, stomp; if you’re a princess, be regal; if you=re a cat, slink and prowl. Your movements will set the tone of your costume. Think of it as Amethod acting.@ One more thing — remember that the judges are sitting with their eyes at about the level of your ankles or knees B don=t forget to hem your costume and wear appropriate footgear.

Why is there a time limit on stage?

A: It may not seem like it, but when you=re up there on stage, a minute is a LOOONNNGGG time! Unless you have a sizable group, it only takes half or three-quarters of a minute to do a little Astage business@ and go off. The longer you stay on stage, the better a Astory@ you should have your costume and presentation tell; if you bore the audience/judges, you lose them. Dances or martial arts displays that go on forever are booorrring! One of the sayings in costume fandom is Ashort is good; funny is better; short and funny is best.@ While that isn=t always the case (there are plenty of serious costumes), it does express the general idea.

I just saw someone walk up to another costumer and say AI hate you!!@ That doesn=t sound very friendly to me!

A: It may seem strange, but that phrase is one of the ultimate accolades in costume fandom, along with AYou=re despicable!!@ What it really means is AYou=ve got a killer costume that I can=t possibly win against, and I should be jealous, but it=s SO great that I love it!@ Costumers enjoy and respect a great costume and great workmanship, even when it=s not their own B that=s what this is all about!

NOW, most important of all, go out and have FUN!!! Oh, and don=t forget to eat something and get some sleep!!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 213 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet

I would imagine that the most likely dealers in the “large space needed”
category would be fabric dealers. Especially if they are going to cut
fabric.

Elaine

> just out of curiosity, are there any other large dealers in the same

league

> with Janet?
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 214 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies
Great document, Tina. Going back to Allison’s letter (seem to be
referencing her a lot these days) we’re missing something important at
the beginning.

“What is a Masquerade?”

It’s probably not what you think. It’s not a masked ball or costume
ball. It’s an opportunity to present your costume and compete for
awards. It’s an opportunity to watch others present costumes.

Masquerades, as we know them, are born out of a long history of
costuming at science fiction conventions, and have evolved greatly over
the last few decades. You may participate as an audience member, an
entrant, or volunteer to be a member of the crew.

<rules> (basically, instructions to find them and read them)

<presentation info>
<styles>
<music>
<time limit>

<judging info>
<divisions>
<workmanship>

<at-con requirements and services>
<registration>
<tech rehearsal>
<green room>
<stage crew>


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 215 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies
Really good, Tina, and not as outdated as you think. Very little work will
bring it up-to-date.

Elaine

 

Group: runacc Message: 216 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/21/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room — back to Janet

While they’re not necessarily in the same league as AlterYears, most dealers in fabric need a lot of space by virtue of the nature of their wares. Fabric dealers would seem to be prime candidates for a CC dealers’ room.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers’ Room — back to Janet

Some good info here, and thanks to Henry /Kyym for the feedback. Does
anyone
else have any other thoughts reagarding fairness, Janet, space, etc.? And
just out of curiosity, are there any other large dealers in the same league
with Janet?

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 217 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
As a convention attendee, I much prefer to see all the dealers in one
location.

On the issue of having Alter Years take up half the space, it was not an
issue for the customers, but I did get the impression at CC21 that some of
the dealers were grumbling. (I think in fact Janet was in competition with
almost everyone in the other room.)

This might seem less pronounced if Alter Years is as far away from the other
dealers as Trudy is suggesting. They may seem like a different feature
entirely. The real test will be whether or not it becomes difficult to
convince other dealers to come in future years if they feel Alter Years’
presence will make it financially not worth their trip.

CC19 had intentionally tried to balance the dealers’ room by having only one
of each type of dealer. The room was not “juried” but it was a case of
“first come” for each type of vendor, due to space limitations. (I think
this system would have worked if the dealers’ room had not been hit by a
black hole of bad luck. We actually had almost twice as many dealers pull
out due to personal or professional disasters than we had present in the
final dealers’ room.)

Therefore we moved the dolls into that room to fill the space, although that
had not originally been the intended home for them. In the end we had a
much larger doll competition than expected so the original space would have
been inadequate. I believe in our case the combination worked both to show
off the doll competition and to draw customers into the room. It only
worked though because we had a big enough room (and few enough remaining
dealers) to accommodate both without crowding.

Eileen

 

Group: runacc Message: 218 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Timeless Textiles were one of the dealers who had to back out of CC19. (My
memory is hazy on this one but I think that their disaster was a theft from
their warehouse.) In general they seem eager to do CC’s, and were not even
afraid of crossing the border with their stock.

Local fabric stores, who are not used to a CC, are not very willing to
commit a staffperson to a weekend convention, even less than their stock.

Eileen

—–Original Message—–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick [mailto:castleb@pulsenet.com]

CCXV had Timeless Textiles (also somebody with vintage “ethnic” textiles)
and I think they did a boffo business.

Obviously, fabric can take up a LOT of space in a very short time, and
local fabric stores may not be keen on packing up their inventory to schlep
to a con. But fabric always does well.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 219 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

I think Timeless Textiles did such a bang-up business at CCXV that
they’ve tried to make a point of showing up when they could. OTOH, I’m
not sure if they’re still in business. Their web site went down last
year, and I haven’t checked to see if they’re back again.

Fabric (especially unusual stuff or natural fiber stuff) generally sells
well. Put that with a trim dealer and Janet’s stuff, and you’ve got
costume on the hoof, right there at the source of the inspiration.

Less successful accessories include ready-made costumes. Better stuff:
trims, notions and findings.

YMMV.

Betsy

Cliff and Eileen wrote:

>
> Timeless Textiles were one of the dealers who had to back out of CC19. (My
> memory is hazy on this one but I think that their disaster was a theft from
> their warehouse.) In general they seem eager to do CC’s, and were not even
> afraid of crossing the border with their stock.
>
> Local fabric stores, who are not used to a CC, are not very willing to
> commit a staffperson to a weekend convention, even less than their stock.
>
> Eileen


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 220 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 03:15 PM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Fabric (especially unusual stuff or natural fiber stuff) generally
> sells
> well. Put that with a trim dealer and Janet’s stuff, and you’ve got
> costume on the hoof, right there at the source of the inspiration.

So the sick thing to do would be to ask the dealers if they would be
willing to spend an extra $10/table to throw into an award pot, the
contest being to make a costume entirely at the con only from materials
bought in the dealer’s room.

Assuming the dealers’ room has enough tables and dealers to support
this sort of thing.

andy


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 221 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

At 06:15 PM 5/22/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>I think Timeless Textiles did such a bang-up business at CCXV that
>they’ve tried to make a point of showing up when they could. OTOH, I’m
>not sure if they’re still in business. Their web site went down last
>year, and I haven’t checked to see if they’re back again.

If they aren’t, a former employee, Brad Dunn, gets his stock from the same
mills and would probably be happy to deal at cons if they don’t conflict
with his schedule. He deals every year at Pennsic and is very reliable
(this after we had MAJOR problems with mail delivery from TT–they were
fine at cons, but trying to mailorder stuff from them was a nightmare).

I have his address and phone # if any concoms are interested.

>Less successful accessories include ready-made costumes. Better stuff:
>trims, notions and findings.

But people WILL buy accessories if they are *accessories* and not full
costumes. Jewelry, greaves/bracers, headbands, corsets, etc. Impulse items
that are cool, but not a whole costume and not necessarily things they
would make for themselves.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 222 From: Les Roth Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Betsy,

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 05:15 PM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> I think Timeless Textiles did such a bang-up business at CCXV that
> they’ve tried to make a point of showing up when they could. OTOH, I’m
> not sure if they’re still in business. Their web site went down last
> year, and I haven’t checked to see if they’re back again.
>

According to the website at :
http://www.houseofanoria.com/Timeless_Fabrics.htm

“House Of Anoria Has Joined Forces With Timeless Fabrics – aka Timeless
Textiles & The Fabric Finders For ALL your costuming needs”

I don’t know if it’s the same people, but their stock looks like it
might be.

Les

Live, never to be ashamed if everything you do is published around the
world. Even if what is published is not true. — Richard Bach

 

Group: runacc Message: 223 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/22/2003
Subject: Re: Newbies stuff from Tina

I’ll hav eto see if I can dig up a copy of the first-timers doc I created.
Might be useful to throw this into a mix.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: “Tina Connell” <cvconnel@nycap.rr.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: [runacc] Newbies

I tried sending this as an attachmentb but Yahoo stripped it off. I think
my second attempt may have only gone to Les, in response to his note. Let’s
try it again.

 

Group: runacc Message: 224 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/23/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Oooo! That’s a neat idea. Most of the dealers would like it, because it would encourage sales. Enough costumers should like it for it to work – there’s always somebody who decided not to make a costume for “this year”, or whose costume wasn’t ready or someone in their group couldn’t make it. When would they display them/be judged? Since they’d need a reasonable amount of time, perhaps adjacent to the last otherwise-scheduled competition (usually the Historical), or the Folio, since (unlike this year) that’s usually a bit sparse for entries? You would need to have at least one dealer who had fabric or some equivalent (leather, plastic, whatever), though now that I think about it, it shouldn’t be too difficult (if somewhat on the pricey side) to make something completely out of trims.

Is anyone keeping a side-list of suggested program items (such as this) that could be included in an appendix to “How to Run a CC”?

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 03:15 PM, Betsy Delaney wrote:
> Fabric (especially unusual stuff or natural fiber stuff) generally
> sells
> well. Put that with a trim dealer and Janet’s stuff, and you’ve got
> costume on the hoof, right there at the source of the inspiration.

So the sick thing to do would be to ask the dealers if they would be
willing to spend an extra $10/table to throw into an award pot, the
contest being to make a costume entirely at the con only from materials
bought in the dealer’s room.

Assuming the dealers’ room has enough tables and dealers to support
this sort of thing.

andy


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 225 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/23/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room and discussion progress

I’m not throwing out any of the messages we’re passing around, but I’m
not compiling anything yet.

I’m down to CC17 and CC19, plus compiling the awards and participant
lists for CC20 and 21. As soon as I’m done (and CC19 is being worked on
right now), I’m going to upload the new site. Then I need to go through
the links page and dump the cobwebs (Thanks, Les, for the new link), at
which point I can concentrate some time on drafting text for the
document.

There has been a TON of good discussion on this list so far. I’m
thankful that people are participating so well and exchanging such
useful information. Now, we need to start drafting stuff for the
document.

Tina, that FAQ is terrific!

There’s already a Dealer doc up on the draft. Would someone care to
compile the comments and suggestions and edit the existing content?

Thanks!

Betsy

Tina Connell wrote:

>
> Is anyone keeping a side-list of suggested program items (such as this) that could be included in an appendix to “How to Run a CC”?
>
> Tina


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 226 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/25/2003
Subject: photography
Another issue to address is photography. Sandy and I just spent an
inordinate amount of time ordering photographs from the official
photographer from CC21. It quite literally took us 3 days to do. The photos
were arranged by photographer, not by costume and covered 14 pages on the
website. What we had to do was print all 14 pages of thumbnails, mark the
back of each thumbnail with the page number, then cut them out and group
them by costume so we could select which shots we wanted.

The cost, as well, was prohibitive to most people. We’re lucky to be flush
enough to drop over $300 on a set with at least one view of each
competition costume. Most aren’t.

We did, by the way, purchase the CD with all the photos. We got it awhile
ago and put it in to see if it would help us choose the best shots. It was
arranged as an Adobe PDF slide show, which also requires that you have the
Adobe Image Player software installed. Granted, it’s free, but if you
don’t want to (or can’t) download new software, you’re SOL. As far as we
can tell, there is no way to select individual shots. You can only play the
slide show. So the photos only stay on the screen for a short time. You can
only start at the beginning. And you can only stop by pressing CNTL-ALT-DEL.

It should be strongly recommended in the future that photography’s goals are

1. A production of archival material easily available for storage and access

2. Availability of photographs for the attendees at a reasonable cost
(reasonable is ~$1.00-1.50 per 4×6 print)

3. Availability of a portfolio of all photographs taken for a cost
significantly less than (price per single print) x (number of total shots)

Similar issues involve video though we haven’t had such a situation with
video yet thanks to folks like Carl, Rusty Dawe and others.

Pierre

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 227 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/26/2003
Subject: Re: photography

Ahh, a subject I must address.
The photographers at CC21 were quite good and thorough but their prices and
ordering system were less than ideal.
I agree with all of Pierre’s points.
Personally we haven’t actually ordered any photos yet (although I intend to
order at least a few) because we discovered a little quirk in the pricing on
the site.
I sent the following message to Henry on May 21st (haven’t heard back yet
but it is the holiday weekend).

>The Digital Focus link (provided by Glen) is actually DotPhoto.
>The prices on the actual link page are $2.50 per 4 x 6 but if you use the
>’contact us’ link it goes further onto the DotPhoto site where 4 x 6’s are
>only $.29 each.
>If you put something in the Cart it totals up at $2.50 per, but the sidebar
>still says $.29 each.
>So which is it? I think you really need to quiz these people because I

think

>many people will hesitate to order until this is a little clearer.

Nora
Also, we were told $2 each for a 4×6 at the con (which was bad enough) and
then it said $2.50 on the site. Blatant misrepresentation.

 

Group: runacc Message: 228 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/26/2003
Subject: Re: photography

Ken Warren is the official photographer for CC22. Having seen Ken’s
work at many other cons, I’ve always been pretty pleased with his work, and
unless he’s changed the way he does things, I think he wiil be closer to
your recommendations.

Trudy

>From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger <costumrs@radiks.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] photography
>Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 09:05:50 -0500
>
>Another issue to address is photography. Sandy and I just spent an
>inordinate amount of time ordering photographs from the official
>photographer from CC21. It quite literally took us 3 days to do. The photos
>were arranged by photographer, not by costume and covered 14 pages on the
>website. What we had to do was print all 14 pages of thumbnails, mark the
>back of each thumbnail with the page number, then cut them out and group
>them by costume so we could select which shots we wanted.
>
>The cost, as well, was prohibitive to most people. We’re lucky to be flush
>enough to drop over $300 on a set with at least one view of each
>competition costume. Most aren’t.
>
>We did, by the way, purchase the CD with all the photos. We got it awhile
>ago and put it in to see if it would help us choose the best shots. It was
>arranged as an Adobe PDF slide show, which also requires that you have the
>Adobe Image Player software installed. Granted, it’s free, but if you
>don’t want to (or can’t) download new software, you’re SOL. As far as we
>can tell, there is no way to select individual shots. You can only play the
>slide show. So the photos only stay on the screen for a short time. You can
>only start at the beginning. And you can only stop by pressing
>CNTL-ALT-DEL.
>
>It should be strongly recommended in the future that photography’s goals
>are
>
>1. A production of archival material easily available for storage and
>access
>
>2. Availability of photographs for the attendees at a reasonable cost
>(reasonable is ~$1.00-1.50 per 4×6 print)
>
>3. Availability of a portfolio of all photographs taken for a cost
>significantly less than (price per single print) x (number of total shots)
>
>
>Similar issues involve video though we haven’t had such a situation with
>video yet thanks to folks like Carl, Rusty Dawe and others.
>
>
>Pierre
>
>
>
>”Those Who Fail To Learn History
>Are Doomed To Repeat It;
>Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
>Why They Are Simply Doomed.”
>
>Achemdro’hm
>”The Illusion of Historical Fact”
>– C.Y. 4971
>
>Andromeda
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 

Group: runacc Message: 229 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: photography – more comments

It’s my suggestion that whenever a relationship is established with a
“vendor” who is serving your con, you make a paper agreement with the
“vendor.” This includes video, photo or any other service you’re
eventually going to offer to your members.

I’ve got a version of the agreement I had with Ken Warren for the photo
package he offered buried somewhere in my paperwork for CCXV. I’ll need
to dig it up. We did something similar for video.

That way, you’re clear on what the service provider is going to give you
and what you’re going to have to pay for.

Things to consider when arranging for archival recording of events:

1. There are two archives and they are completely separate: The Pat and
Peggy Kennedy Memorial Archives (attached to the ICG), and the
Costume-Con Archives (maintained by me). In the past few years, I’ve
made a personal arrangement with each CC to provide a set of photos and
videos for the CC Archives. Until last year, I didn’t have a problem
with getting a complete set of photos (though the photos were not always
prints – CC19 or Greg Bradt donated a free CD-ROM of the photos).

2. There are more things that should be photographed than just the
Friday Night Social and the costume competitions. For CC17, 18 and 21, I
personally photographed the doll contest and exhibits. At CC19, the
dolls were photographed by Greg (I think). These things should also be
photographed for archival purposes. So should any other static
competitions. The need to have them photographed must be communicated to
the official photographer. Don’t make assumptions. There are no official
shots of the CCXV doll contest, and so there are no photos to go with
the competition list.

3. We had to spend an unanticipated amount of money to have our video
for CCXV edited by someone other than the videographer. We made the
dollar amount back in the sale of the videos, but what could have been
an additional income maker for future CCs instead became a
near-liability. Be sure that you’ve got the complete outline of costs
associated with producing anything out of your own CC’s pocket. If the
videographer is taking care of the whole thing then you have less to
worry about, but it’s still a good idea to get the expectations down in
writing.

4. I’ve also been promised a complete set of digital disks from all of
the photographs, separate from the disk they were sending to people who
ordered them. If worse comes to worst, I’ll be using the prints and
scanning them in. Not a lovely prospect. And if they’re so concerned
about copyright and copy protection, it could well be that the digital
disks won’t be of any use to me for the web site. It also needs to be
made clear to the photographers that the photos will be published, and
to be sure that rights to publish those photos have been allowed for
your conference and for the Archive site.

Regarding CC21: I’m still not clear on what I’m ultimately going to get.
I’ve purchased about a third of the complete set of photos available
online. (I agree completely that the method by which the costume shots
were displayed was completely unacceptable, but in talking to the
photographer, I’ve been told that it was the only way they could put up
the shots so fast.) Most of the photos are okay, but I had very little
time to make the decision on which photos I wanted. I’m still waiting
for reimbursement from the con com, though I’ve been told that it’s on
the way.

Betsy

Trudy Leonard wrote:

>
> Ken Warren is the official photographer for CC22. Having seen Ken’s
> work at many other cons, I’ve always been pretty pleased with his work, and
> unless he’s changed the way he does things, I think he wiil be closer to
> your recommendations.
>
> Trudy
>
> >From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger <costumrs@radiks.net>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [runacc] photography
> >Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 09:05:50 -0500
> >
> >Another issue to address is photography. Sandy and I just spent an
> >inordinate amount of time ordering photographs from the official
> >photographer from CC21. It quite literally took us 3 days to do. The photos
> >were arranged by photographer, not by costume and covered 14 pages on the
> >website. What we had to do was print all 14 pages of thumbnails, mark the
> >back of each thumbnail with the page number, then cut them out and group
> >them by costume so we could select which shots we wanted.
> >
> >The cost, as well, was prohibitive to most people. We’re lucky to be flush
> >enough to drop over $300 on a set with at least one view of each
> >competition costume. Most aren’t.
> >
> >We did, by the way, purchase the CD with all the photos. We got it awhile
> >ago and put it in to see if it would help us choose the best shots. It was
> >arranged as an Adobe PDF slide show, which also requires that you have the
> >Adobe Image Player software installed. Granted, it’s free, but if you
> >don’t want to (or can’t) download new software, you’re SOL. As far as we
> >can tell, there is no way to select individual shots. You can only play the
> >slide show. So the photos only stay on the screen for a short time. You can
> >only start at the beginning. And you can only stop by pressing
> >CNTL-ALT-DEL.
> >
> >It should be strongly recommended in the future that photography’s goals
> >are
> >
> >1. A production of archival material easily available for storage and
> >access
> >
> >2. Availability of photographs for the attendees at a reasonable cost
> >(reasonable is ~$1.00-1.50 per 4×6 print)
> >
> >3. Availability of a portfolio of all photographs taken for a cost
> >significantly less than (price per single print) x (number of total shots)
> >
> >
> >Similar issues involve video though we haven’t had such a situation with
> >video yet thanks to folks like Carl, Rusty Dawe and others.
> >
> >
> >Pierre
> >
> >
> >
> >”Those Who Fail To Learn History
> >Are Doomed To Repeat It;
> >Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
> >Why They Are Simply Doomed.”
> >
> >Achemdro’hm
> >”The Illusion of Historical Fact”
> >– C.Y. 4971
> >
> >Andromeda
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 230 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: photography

TRudy, Ken is an excellent choice.

We just re ran in exibit only the 5 center costumes from Crimson King, at
Balticon, not only to try to help fill their Masq., but mainly to have Ken
take photos of us.

Not only did they come out great, we had some to take home with us.

Ricky
At 07:44 PM 5/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:

> Ken Warren is the official photographer for CC22. Having seen Ken’s
>work at many other cons, I’ve always been pretty pleased with his work, and
>unless he’s changed the way he does things, I think he wiil be closer to
>your recommendations.
>
>Trudy
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 231 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/27/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Trudy, and all,
One thing that we asked our dealers was if they wanted tables, or
just the space. It was a combination, but a good question to ask. I also suggest
that when your dealers’ room person comes up with the layout, get it to the
hotel ASAP, and possibly in your contract.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 232 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/28/2003
Subject: Re: photography

At 06:44 PM 5/26/2003, you wrote:

> Ken Warren is the official photographer for CC22. Having seen Ken’s
>work at many other cons, I’ve always been pretty pleased with his work, and
>unless he’s changed the way he does things, I think he wiil be closer to
>your recommendations.
>
>Trudy

Ken has always been superb and I have no qualms with him as the C-C22
official photographer

Pierre

> >From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger <costumrs@radiks.net>
> >Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [runacc] photography
> >Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 09:05:50 -0500
> >
> >Another issue to address is photography. Sandy and I just spent an
> >inordinate amount of time ordering photographs from the official
> >photographer from CC21. It quite literally took us 3 days to do. The photos
> >were arranged by photographer, not by costume and covered 14 pages on the
> >website. What we had to do was print all 14 pages of thumbnails, mark the
> >back of each thumbnail with the page number, then cut them out and group
> >them by costume so we could select which shots we wanted.
> >
> >The cost, as well, was prohibitive to most people. We’re lucky to be flush
> >enough to drop over $300 on a set with at least one view of each
> >competition costume. Most aren’t.
> >
> >We did, by the way, purchase the CD with all the photos. We got it awhile
> >ago and put it in to see if it would help us choose the best shots. It was
> >arranged as an Adobe PDF slide show, which also requires that you have the
> >Adobe Image Player software installed. Granted, it’s free, but if you
> >don’t want to (or can’t) download new software, you’re SOL. As far as we
> >can tell, there is no way to select individual shots. You can only play the
> >slide show. So the photos only stay on the screen for a short time. You can
> >only start at the beginning. And you can only stop by pressing
> >CNTL-ALT-DEL.
> >
> >It should be strongly recommended in the future that photography’s goals
> >are
> >
> >1. A production of archival material easily available for storage and
> >access
> >
> >2. Availability of photographs for the attendees at a reasonable cost
> >(reasonable is ~$1.00-1.50 per 4×6 print)
> >
> >3. Availability of a portfolio of all photographs taken for a cost
> >significantly less than (price per single print) x (number of total shots)
> >
> >
> >Similar issues involve video though we haven’t had such a situation with
> >video yet thanks to folks like Carl, Rusty Dawe and others.
> >
> >
> >Pierre
> >
> >
> >
> >”Those Who Fail To Learn History
> >Are Doomed To Repeat It;
> >Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
> >Why They Are Simply Doomed.”
> >
> >Achemdro’hm
> >”The Illusion of Historical Fact”
> >– C.Y. 4971
> >
> >Andromeda
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 233 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
Dear all,
Bobbi Gear mentioned that she had several neos as staff/den mommies in
the Green Room this year. It does not appear to have been much of a problem
except…
Very few entrants went to see the workmanship judges. And for entrants
who arrived late, it was not a priority. The workmanship judges expressed the
regret that more of the entrants had not come to see them, since they believe
from what they did see at a distance that they could have given more awards.
This year’s Arisia also had several neo-mommies. I had been a den mommy
before so I took the initiative to write a check list for the two or three
neos and it seemed to have helped.
First, each den parent should have a list by entry number and title of
every one in their den. The check-in person usually prepares this.
My list included the status checks a den parent should remind/enforce an
entrant to do.
It included official photography, and details for the ninjas like an odd
entrance or exit that the rest of the staff need.
Gentle reminders for their own health and safety like drinks and snacks,
bathroom, repair table, no anachronisms (give me your watch, eyeglasses,
convention badge to hold for you).
And the strong encouragement to see the workmanship judge(s), because
after putting all your effort into constructing the costume, there must be some
part you are especially proud of making happen.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten something.

I heard reports the work aprons for the den mommies were useful at
Lunacon to identify the mommies/dens to the participants. I believe Balticon used
sign posts with the den numbers. Could someone else speak to this?
Joni Dashoff

PS Andy, you’re right ..if you tell the MD you’re available, they can act
(or not) and appoint you a judge. Of course, it helps to have all the masters on
site involved in a masquerade (re)presentation. Thank you to Karen and Ricky,
et al. that glimpse of wonder.

 

Group: runacc Message: 234 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room
RE Joani’s comments on the Balticon Green Room –
The group that screamed the loudest about not being judged for
workmanship arrived in the Green Room after the Workmanship Judges had
left to be introduced. This group is experienced enough to know that if
they want workmanship judging they need to get down to the green room
more than 3 minutes before the start of the masquerade. On the other
hand, there were several neos who did not know that workmanship judging
is optional and that they have to go to the workmanship judges on their
own. We plan to make some changes to the sign-up forms and include a
Workmanship Judging form with instructions for next year.

Bobby had the bright pink den signs and I know that she had borrowed
Vivki’s bright green Den Mom aprons, but since I wasn’t in the green
room I don’t know if they got used or not.

One bit of kvetch — If we don’t get more than 15 entries in our
masquerade, I’m not sure that the expense for tech and green room can be
justified to the con. Does anybody out there have any constructive
thoughts about how we can get more people to compete?

^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 235 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Costume-ConNections going down momentarily. Drum roll, please!
Hi, folks!

This message is being crossposted for widest dispersal. If you want to
forward this message offlist, please feel free, as long as you send the
whole darn thing.

In just a few short minutes, I’m going to replace the current home page
of http://www.Costume-Con.org/ with a place-holder. Then, when I’m done
doublechecking links, I’m going to reload all 5,000 or so files in the
current site.

When I’m done, you will notice:

* Links to all participants and awards from every page, including
complete photo indices for each CC that has photos available online
* Updated information on CC21 and CC20 (including masquerade
participants for both)
* Updated information on the Timeline, including official information on
CC24 and unofficial bids through CC26
* A wider format for all pages, allowing for better display on larger
monitors

FYI: Digital versions of the photos have been requested for CC21 and
prints are already in my hands. CC21 video should be in my hands
shortly. CC10 and CC12 photos are also in my hands. All will be added
AFTER the new site launches.

If you notice anything weird (broken pages, missing content, malformed
stuff) AFTER I announce the relaunch, please contact me ASAP!

Thanks in advance for your patience and understanding.

Cheers,

Betsy

Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 236 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room

>Marty,

in addition to the things we chatted about at the con,
Does the con com care about whether the entries are for show or for
exhibiton? Do they just care about how many entries overall?
hopefully they just want a big masq and a good show to warrant the budget.

For us, we’ll be happy to display something for you each year if we can’t
get something new done.

Most of that is because of the switch in Balticon to After most costume cons.
I would have been happy to compete the 5 characters of Crimson King at
Balticon, then take the whole unfair large group professional entry to
costume con.
But that isn’t possible anymore.

I know that for myself, and at least Carol Salemi, we view Balticon as
‘home’ and will gladly exhibit something to help fill the masq if it will help.

and if it will, then do we need to start making calls to any known
costumers attending Balticon, asking them to just help fill out the show if
there’s nothing new to compete.

I was also wondering about folks bringing display costumes that might not
have ever seen a Balticon, even if they don’t fit anymore.
I know that our 2 den moms are brand new, and would have loved to go on
stage for a fiorst time with no win pressure or even , my first costume is
being judged pressure, as it would be a display of someone else work.

an example, at CC11 Karen sold off a bunch of her old stuff.
all con worn, and most won something out in California.
Faith Baker has one or two.
Would it be cool if she wore it in display and it was announced that it was
from the Equicon Fashion Show 1975 in LA?

And I hope this is okay on this list.
Balticon was always a BIG feeder con for CC costumes, and if we loose it,
CCon the east coast is in trouble.

I’m sure Andy and Kevin will be trying to seed as much of Baycon between
now and CC-26 for the same reason.

Ricky

>One bit of kvetch — If we don’t get more than 15 entries in our
>masquerade, I’m not sure that the expense for tech and green room can be
>justified to the con. Does anybody out there have any constructive
>thoughts about how we can get more people to compete?
>
>^M^
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 237 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room

>
> I’m sure Andy and Kevin will be trying to seed as much of Baycon between
> now and CC-26 for the same reason.
>

Thanks to our friends the Stitchin’ Babes, our anime contacts, our Furry
contacts, andsoforthandsoforth…

1) The BayCon masquerade may have grown enough that the concom will finally
have to let go of its repressed hostility towards on-stage masquerades and
improve the support system… plus get rid of the gawd-awful names “Novice”
and “Professional” for their two divisions. We’ve got a very
audience-conscious MD in place now who knows costumers and is asking for our
advice, so cross your fingers. We’re trying to help Hilary stay true to the
Baycon concom’s professed wish to run a “beginner-friendly” masquerade,
while coaxing them away from the “costumer-unfriendly” habits they’ve
developed. The last couple of years are really putting the pressure on the
concom to put their money where their mouths are.

2) We’re going to work hard with our friends keeping the costume programming
high profile and high quality at BayCon, and keep some coverage for the year
that CC is Memorial Day weekend (the source of much of the concom oft-denied
hostility)

3) We’ve got groups (see above) coming out of the woodwork asking what they
can do to make sure our bid comes off. A very good sign.

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 238 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>> Marty,
>

<snip>

> Does the con com care about whether the entries are for show or for
> exhibiton? Do they just care about how many entries overall?
> hopefully they just want a big masq and a good show to warrant the
> budget.
>

That’s basically it. The masquerade is the BIG attraction for Saturday
night as well as being where we get most of the money for R.I.F. If we
can keep people entertained for 2 to 2-1/2 hours, then I don’t think
that there will be any bitching from the con com. Figure half an hour
for the Young Writers’ and Compton Crook awards, 45 minutes to an hour
for the RIF auction /(Judging), and 15 minutes for the Masquerade
awards, that means that I need 45 minutes to an hour worth of costumes
going across the stage at a minimum.

> For us, we’ll be happy to display something for you each year if we
> can’t get something new done.

This would be fine. Hell, you could even repeat something that you did
five years before at a Balticon. (Classic Costume? Best of the Oldies?)

<snip>

> and if it will, then do we need to start making calls to any known
> costumers attending Balticon, asking them to just help fill out the
> show if there’s nothing new to compete.

This would probably be a good idea. The “Best in Class – Journeyman” was
Diane Kovalsin’s Jedi group who worked out a presentation over dinner
when we told her that we were getting desperate for entries.

> I was also wondering about folks bringing display costumes that might
> not have ever seen a Balticon, even if they don’t fit anymore. I know
> that our 2 den moms are brand new, and would have loved to go on
> stage for a first time with no win pressure or even , my first
> costume is being judged pressure, as it would be a display of someone
> else work.
> an example, at CC11 Karen sold off a bunch of her old stuff. all con
> worn, and most won something out in California. Faith Baker has one
> or two. Would it be cool if she wore it in display and it was
> announced that it was from the Equicon Fashion Show 1975 in LA?

One of the things that we talked about in the hall would be to do a
$1.98 Costume Panel on Saturday and then show the efforts at the
Masquerade, and also to have a show us your hall costume parade. I’m all
in favor of making newbies comfortable and I really like your
suggestion. (Hell, we could have had someone show off my chorus costume
from Crimson King if I had thought about it.)

> And I hope this is okay on this list. Balticon was always a BIG
> feeder con for CC costumes, and if we loose it, CCon the east coast
> is in trouble.
>

It works for me. There were a bunch of the GCFCG members at the con who
weren’t in costume and I/we need to nag them.

Thanks for your suggestions —
^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 239 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Draft invite/job description for CC26 Bid Committee members
so this is my draft intro letter for people invited to join our bid
committee. So far no bid committee members have been added to the
cc26sv-staff mailing list, at least not until I could have this
document and a few supporting documents written up.

——-
Welcome to the CC26? Bid Committee. Before you accept our invitation,
we would like you to look over this description of the responsibilities
you are accepting.

As a member of the CC26? Bid Committee, it’s your job to help market
Costume-Con 26 in Silicon Valley in your region and in the costume
organizations and communities you participate in. What does this really
mean?

1. We’re building a list of costume organizations to distribute fliers
and progress reports to. We need your help in collecting names.
2. We’re building a calendar of costume events that bid committee
members are planning to attend. We need your help in telling us where
you’re going to be.
3. We’re distributing event fliers at costume events. We need your help
in taking fliers to your events. An Adobe PDF including all fliers is
available for downloading and may be printed in either color or
black-and-white.
4. We’re giving out “CC26? Pre-Con Costume Award” ribbons at costume
events. We need your help in giving out these awards. Drop us a note
with your mailing address and we’ll send you a packet of them.
5. We’re hosting “League of Evil Geniuses” parties at costume-heavy
conventions. If you would like to host a party at your local
convention, we’ll provide you with the information you’ll need to do so.

This is not a convention with deep pockets. The conference can’t fund a
lot of this activity. The Bid Chair will fund printing and shipping of
award ribbons (so we can maintain consistency). As to the rest, we’re
working on a mechanism where you can submit expense reports and be
receipted so you can deduct those expenses from your taxes as a
donation to the Unconventional Foundation. More detailed information
will be available as we complete our incorporation paperwork and work
with our accountant.

If you’re willing to take on this responsibility and the occasional
printing expense, then once again, welcome to the CC26? Bid Committee


andy trembley, CC26? Bid Chair
http://www.cc26.info/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 240 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/29/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room

I agree with Joni. It is important that all entries have official photos taken and that all are encouraged to go for (optional) workmanship judging. If possible, I assign neos as mother’s helpers rather than den moms, but often have had no choice, since the number of volunteers has been sparse. I try to give my green room staff a thorough briefing on the several aspects of their responsibility — with any luck, before too many entrants arrive. I have found that this is helpful to first-time den moms. This is one of the reasons the green room manager needs to be there first and to have the staff arrive before the contestants do.

In my green rooms, the check-in clerk hands each entrant a 3×5 entry card upon arrival with the direction to give it to the den mom. The den mom already has a list of entry numbers (at least); the card provides a way for the den mom to check that all entries are present and to let me know if someone has not shown up. The den mom also can use the card to record official photography and workmanship judging, if he or she wishes.

It would be very helpful if entry forms included a request for information on the direction of stage entries and exits. In the absence of such information, I ask the den moms to check whether any entrant(s) may be entering or leaving the stage counter to the default path. To meet such needs, the green room manager may need to provide a mother’s helper on the other side of the stage, pre-position some members of an entry, and/or warn the back stage crew about two-way traffic!

If space permits, I like to arrange dens in semi-circles of chairs, so that each den is distinct, rather than simply lining chairs up along the walls of the green room. In either case, it is essential to provide a sign identifying each den by number (as well as signs for check-in, food and water, repairs, workmanship judging, and photography). We usually print up sets of such signs to use in the green room; I’d be happy to make the computer files available. (I think they’re in WordPerfect but maybe in Word.).

Tabards or similar garb to make green room staff visible can be valuable. I have used headbands, ribbons, and similar devices to identify green room staff; this primarily was for security purposes. ConFrancisco provided aprons to den moms. This year, we used identifying tabards at Lunacon for the first time. They certainly made the Den Moms’ visible! The ones we used had been made by Vicki Warren for use at Philcon, They’re in an absolutely horrible bright green that is hard to miss in the chaos of a green room. I have a similar set on order from another costumer.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: JBdashoff@aol.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:39 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Green Room

Dear all,
Bobbi Gear mentioned that she had several neos as staff/den mommies in
the Green Room this year. It does not appear to have been much of a problem
except…
Very few entrants went to see the workmanship judges. And for entrants
who arrived late, it was not a priority. The workmanship judges expressed the
regret that more of the entrants had not come to see them, since they believe
from what they did see at a distance that they could have given more awards.
This year’s Arisia also had several neo-mommies. I had been a den mommy
before so I took the initiative to write a check list for the two or three
neos and it seemed to have helped.
First, each den parent should have a list by entry number and title of
every one in their den. The check-in person usually prepares this.
My list included the status checks a den parent should remind/enforce an
entrant to do.
It included official photography, and details for the ninjas like an odd
entrance or exit that the rest of the staff need.
Gentle reminders for their own health and safety like drinks and snacks,
bathroom, repair table, no anachronisms (give me your watch, eyeglasses,
convention badge to hold for you).
And the strong encouragement to see the workmanship judge(s), because
after putting all your effort into constructing the costume, there must be some
part you are especially proud of making happen.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten something.

I heard reports the work aprons for the den mommies were useful at
Lunacon to identify the mommies/dens to the participants. I believe Balticon used
sign posts with the den numbers. Could someone else speak to this?
Joni Dashoff

PS Andy, you’re right ..if you tell the MD you’re available, they can act
(or not) and appoint you a judge. Of course, it helps to have all the masters on
site involved in a masquerade (re)presentation. Thank you to Karen and Ricky,
et al. that glimpse of wonder.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 241 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: Re: Green Room

Oh, I think this information is pertinent. Many of the CCs (most, if not
all) are managed by people who are also managing regional or local cons.
I assume that much of what we learn on the local level will be applied
to management when we get to Costume-Con. If we are noticing issues
locally, that aren’t established in the how-to yet, I can’t see a reason
why we wouldn’t want to discuss them here.

That’s all the input I have at the moment. More next week, I hope!

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>

[snip]

> And I hope this is okay on this list.
> Balticon was always a BIG feeder con for CC costumes, and if we loose it,
> CCon the east coast is in trouble.

[snip]


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 242 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: DRAFT monthly reminder
This is your monthly reminder from CC26SV-Staff, the email list for Bid
Committee and Conference Committee members working on Costume-Con 26:
Adventures in the Costume Continuum.

There are a few ground-rules on this list:
1. This is not a chat-list. We’re focusing on conference business here.
2. Everybody should have a job description. If you don’t have one or
don’t know what yours is, contact chair@cc26.info to work on it.
3. If you see aan area that isn’t being covered, don’t just take it on.
Contact chair@cc26.info first, and work with the chairman to determine
where the responsibility should really lie.
4. If you have a suggestion that’s in somebody else’s area of
responsibility, take it directly (offlist) to them first.
5. On-list brainstorming sessions are the exception to rule #4, but
those should be called by the person responsible.
6. If negotiating with other departments off-list, results must be
posted on-list as soon as possible. Other folks can benefit from your
results.
7. Monthly status reports will at some point in the future be
requested. We’ll post the format when the time comes.

There are also a bunch of resources available in this group:

The Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cc26sv-staff/files/
contains documents and files of use to committee members.

The Database section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cc26sv-staff/database
contains tables of contact information for BidCom and ConCom members.
Please update your contact information here. If you have contact
information for organizations we should be marketing to, add those to
the “Marketing Mailing List” table.

The Links section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cc26sv-staff/links
contains links to other websites of interest to the committee.

If you have problems accessing these sections, contact bid@cc26.info
for assistance.

 

Group: runacc Message: 243 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/30/2003
Subject: Oh, just to clarify…
I’ve been working on the support docs for our CC26 bid. I’m posting
copies of some that are pertinent to runacc over here too.

andy


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 244 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/1/2003
Subject: Drum roll, please! Costume-ConNections Relaunched!
Hi, folks!

Roughly 5,500 files and several days later, I’m pleased as punch to
announce the unveiling of the new and improved Costume-ConNections web
site at:

http://www.Costume-Con.org/

The new site (which has some major and some minor changes) is live now.

You will notice at the top of each page that you can now reach the lists
for all competiton participants and awards recipients (for which I have
data). This data now includes both Costume-Con 20 and Costume-Con 21.

As always, if you notice an error in a listing, please bring it to my
attention by sending email to my Costume-Con.org address.

The Links page still needs to be overhauled, but that’s going to wait a
little while. I expect to be working on the photos for CC21 shortly, and
the remaining four CCs after that.

Thanks to all of you for your continued support, compliments and
suggestions!!!

Happy costuming,

Betsy Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 245 From: Tina Connell Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Fabric dealer (re: dealers room discussion a couple of weeks ago)

When the subject of fabric dealers came up, I tried to look up Timeless Textiles on-line, and came up dry — apparently their website went bye-bye. Undeterred, I sent them an e-mail to the address I had, and finally today (weeks later) got the attached response. This is FYI, for anyone who would like the update. They do have a nice selection.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Ttextiles@aol.com
To: cvconnel@nycap.rr.com
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: Are you still there?

Yes, we are still in business. Our fabrics can be found on a friends web site at www.houseofanoria.com
Note the new address below:

Timeless Fabrics
PO Box 476
Hershey, PA 17033
pH (717) 930-0928
fax (717) 531-2434
Ttextiles@aol.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 246 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Da Packet…
As I started to put together our master marketing list, I asked myself
“What the hell are we going to mail out to colleges and clubs once
we’ve got their addresses?”

I looked back (or rather dug through my memory) and came up with
Australia’s bid packet. Now I doubt that we (CC26) can get our CVB to
put together that sort of thing for us (tho I could be wrong), and we
can’t afford to put together quite so fancy a packet on our own, but we
can still use it as a model. There are cheaper ways to put together a
packet than glossy printing and wire binding.

So what really needs to go into the packet?
1. A cover letter
2. A 2- or 4-side report with more detailed information about the
conference
3. A 1-4 page “portfolio” showing examples of masquerade and contest
entries
4. Copies of event fliers relevant to the organization
All can go into a simple pocket folder with the conference name and
logo stickered on to the front.

This sort of packet will probably come out to a few bucks each,
depending on cost of the folders, cost of printing the portfolio sheets
and associated mailing costs. It’s probably worth it, though, for
promoting to organizations outside of the fannish (and recreationist)
worlds; some folks need to equate “good” with “professional” when
looking at conference materials.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 247 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

Andy,

Good start, but you should also include something about the panels,
workshops, etc. We do have an educational function, too, remember.

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!

> As I started to put together our master marketing list, I asked myself
> “What the hell are we going to mail out to colleges and clubs once
> we’ve got their addresses?”
>
> I looked back (or rather dug through my memory) and came up with
> Australia’s bid packet. Now I doubt that we (CC26) can get our CVB to
> put together that sort of thing for us (tho I could be wrong), and we
> can’t afford to put together quite so fancy a packet on our own, but we
> can still use it as a model. There are cheaper ways to put together a
> packet than glossy printing and wire binding.
>
> So what really needs to go into the packet?
> 1. A cover letter
> 2. A 2- or 4-side report with more detailed information about the
> conference
> 3. A 1-4 page “portfolio” showing examples of masquerade and contest
> entries
> 4. Copies of event fliers relevant to the organization
> All can go into a simple pocket folder with the conference name and
> logo stickered on to the front.
>
> This sort of packet will probably come out to a few bucks each,
> depending on cost of the folders, cost of printing the portfolio sheets
> and associated mailing costs. It’s probably worth it, though, for
> promoting to organizations outside of the fannish (and recreationist)
> worlds; some folks need to equate “good” with “professional” when
> looking at conference materials.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 248 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 07:13 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:

> Andy,
>
> Good start, but you should also include something about the panels,
> workshops, etc. We do have an educational function, too, remember.

My thoughts were that should be part of the detailed report on the
conference.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 249 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…
With a little modification, this would be a good thing to hand to the hotel
staff so they know what we are all about.

Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 250 From: betsy Date: 6/2/2003
Subject: Re: Da Packet…

I’ll be interested to see what you come up with, content-wise. Feel free to
run it through here, if you want, for additional feedback.

Some of the material could come from the Costume-ConNections FAQ. I just
answered a question that I get infrequently about who can attend a CC and how
membership works.

I’ll be posting the data to the FAQ sometime this week. I’ve got the Guestbook
and FAQ to update, and the Links page to revisit for cobwebs.

Cheers,

Betsy

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 19:18:08 -0700, Andrew Trembley wrote

> On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 07:13 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:
>
> > Andy,
> >
> > Good start, but you should also include something about the panels,
> > workshops, etc. We do have an educational function, too, remember.
>
> My thoughts were that should be part of the detailed report on the
> conference.
>
> andy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large
WebInvent.com, Inc.

************************************************************************
www.WebInvent.com * www.Costume-Con.org * www.hawkeswood.com
************************************************************************

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 4 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 4 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 151 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 152 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 153 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 154 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions
Group: runacc Message: 155 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions
Group: runacc Message: 156 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Fiddling around with names…
Group: runacc Message: 157 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions
Group: runacc Message: 158 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: Fiddling around with names…
Group: runacc Message: 159 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/14/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 160 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 161 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 162 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 163 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 164 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Fwd: [ICG-D] CCXV
Group: runacc Message: 165 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: [ICG-D] CCXV
Group: runacc Message: 166 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 167 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/17/2003
Subject: Fw (from a new CC attendee): CC21 and ICG questions
Group: runacc Message: 168 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/17/2003
Subject: Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 169 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 170 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Historical Masq
Group: runacc Message: 171 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 172 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Historical Masq
Group: runacc Message: 173 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 174 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 175 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 176 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 177 From: Karen Heim Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 178 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 179 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 180 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 181 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 182 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 183 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Historical Masq
Group: runacc Message: 184 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 185 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 186 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 187 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 188 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 189 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 190 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Exhibits/Dealers (was Re: Dealers Room)
Group: runacc Message: 191 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 192 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 193 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 194 From: Les Roth Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 195 From: betsy Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 196 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Dealers’ Room
Group: runacc Message: 197 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room
Group: runacc Message: 198 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 199 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served
Group: runacc Message: 200 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 151 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

Dear Betsy and the rest of the list,
I’m on AOL, but I don’t use the IM option, although my younger son could
educate me if necessary.
I asked to be on this list because, although I am only a journeyman
costumer, I have been very active in fandom. I have extensive experience in
both convention running and creating forms and rules. I acquired this being
an art show director, co-revisor of ASFA’s Art Show Guidelines, and treasurer
for PSFS, ASFA, and for my sins, the recent Philly Worldcon.
Joni Brill Dashoff

In a message dated 04/25/2003 10:25:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:

> Hi, folks!
>
> There are now 21 members of this list.
>
> Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
> bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 152 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

Welcome to the list, Joni, and nice seeing you at LunaCon.

–Karen

At 12:28 AM 5/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Dear Betsy and the rest of the list,
> I’m on AOL, but I don’t use the IM option, although my younger son
> could
>educate me if necessary.
> I asked to be on this list because, although I am only a journeyman
>costumer, I have been very active in fandom. I have extensive experience in
>both convention running and creating forms and rules. I acquired this being
>an art show director, co-revisor of ASFA’s Art Show Guidelines, and treasurer
>for PSFS, ASFA, and for my sins, the recent Philly Worldcon.
> Joni Brill Dashoff
>
>In a message dated 04/25/2003 10:25:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
>
> > Hi, folks!
> >
> > There are now 21 members of this list.
> >
> > Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
> > bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.
> >
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 153 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

Joni —

Don’t worry about the division in which you compete. When I do compete, I do so in the Novice division. This list is about running Costume-Cons, not about competing in their masquerades. Your experience makes you especially qualified to participate.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: JBdashoff@aol.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] My AIM Account — FYI

Dear Betsy and the rest of the list,
I’m on AOL, but I don’t use the IM option, although my younger son could
educate me if necessary.
I asked to be on this list because, although I am only a journeyman
costumer, I have been very active in fandom. I have extensive experience in
both convention running and creating forms and rules. I acquired this being
an art show director, co-revisor of ASFA’s Art Show Guidelines, and treasurer
for PSFS, ASFA, and for my sins, the recent Philly Worldcon.
Joni Brill Dashoff

In a message dated 04/25/2003 10:25:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:

> Hi, folks!
>
> There are now 21 members of this list.
>
> Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
> bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 154 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/12/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions

A follow-up to my message of a few minutes ago. It’s not terribly hard to learn any of the jobs in running a masquerade. Usually, you can do so by volunteering to take various positions in the masquerade staff. Successful experience leads to increased responsibility. Beyond that, there are two pre-eminent books on running masquerades: The Kennedy Compendium, by the late Peggy Kennedy, and The Masquerade Handbook, by Cat Devereaux and other CGW members. To a considerable extent, I learned what I do by reading the two and internalizing their (sometimes contradictory) advice. Tina and I have copies available of the Compendium. Cat may be able to help you locate copies of the Handbook.

Yet, as they stand, neither work is up-to-date or appropriate for an International-level competition; they are a decade old and have to be adapted for that stage. A number of us are working on the preparation of a Costume-Con Runners’ Guide, the equivalent of the Worldcon Runners’ Guide. I expect that a great deal of the discussion under this thread on ICG-D will help to shape our work.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 10:42 PM
Subject: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions

> Becoming a judge means the MD has asked you. I think it’s arrogant and
> presumptuous to go around to MDs going, “I’m available to judge. Pick
> me!” What if they don’t *want* you?

Karen Heim had a number of good questions from an earlier post regarding
judges

And this leads me to a whole list of questions for those of you who have
been doing the costuming and con thing longer than I have. This is a
subject I want to understand thoroughly. I’ve been saving some letters
posted earlier in regards to the other issues I raised. This is gonna take
some time, so pull up a chair.

First, foremost and central: How does one become a judge? It’s obvously
not just because you’ve costumed for years. We have any number of judges
who have little, if any, costume construction experience, but it’s obvious
they know their stuff.

Karen feels uncomfortable volunteering. I can understand that. One has to
have a certain amount of confidence to volunteer, because you don’t know if
someone feels you “worthy” or not. So, I assume it’s not just a matter of
“you have to know someone”.

Veterans: Who typically selects the judges? Those of you who have picked
the judges for your masquerades, what are your criteria?

(And by the way, how are masquerade directors themselve chosen, for that
matter?)

Bruce

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Enter:

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ICG-D-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 155 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions

For the record, I’ve got copies of both publications, so we should be
covered in that section.

Regarding Bruce’s questions – I haven’t read the original yet. My ICG-D
box stands at 140 unread messages, and it’s likely to stay that way for
at least the next few days.

I can answer some of the questions concerning CCXV, since I selected the
MDs.

Later,

Betsy

Byron Connell wrote:

>
> A follow-up to my message of a few minutes ago. It’s not terribly hard to learn any of the jobs in running a masquerade. Usually, you can do so by volunteering to take various positions in the masquerade staff. Successful experience leads to increased responsibility. Beyond that, there are two pre-eminent books on running masquerades: The Kennedy Compendium, by the late Peggy Kennedy, and The Masquerade Handbook, by Cat Devereaux and other CGW members. To a considerable extent, I learned what I do by reading the two and internalizing their (sometimes contradictory) advice. Tina and I have copies available of the Compendium. Cat may be able to help you locate copies of the Handbook.
>
> Yet, as they stand, neither work is up-to-date or appropriate for an International-level competition; they are a decade old and have to be adapted for that stage. A number of us are working on the preparation of a Costume-Con Runners’ Guide, the equivalent of the Worldcon Runners’ Guide. I expect that a great deal of the discussion under this thread on ICG-D will help to shape our work.
>
> Byron
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Bruce & Nora Mai
> To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 10:42 PM
> Subject: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions
>
> > Becoming a judge means the MD has asked you. I think it’s arrogant and
> > presumptuous to go around to MDs going, “I’m available to judge. Pick
> > me!” What if they don’t *want* you?
>
> Karen Heim had a number of good questions from an earlier post regarding
> judges
>
> And this leads me to a whole list of questions for those of you who have
> been doing the costuming and con thing longer than I have. This is a
> subject I want to understand thoroughly. I’ve been saving some letters
> posted earlier in regards to the other issues I raised. This is gonna take
> some time, so pull up a chair.
>
> First, foremost and central: How does one become a judge? It’s obvously
> not just because you’ve costumed for years. We have any number of judges
> who have little, if any, costume construction experience, but it’s obvious
> they know their stuff.
>
> Karen feels uncomfortable volunteering. I can understand that. One has to
> have a certain amount of confidence to volunteer, because you don’t know if
> someone feels you “worthy” or not. So, I assume it’s not just a matter of
> “you have to know someone”.
>
> Veterans: Who typically selects the judges? Those of you who have picked
> the judges for your masquerades, what are your criteria?
>
> (And by the way, how are masquerade directors themselve chosen, for that
> matter?)
>
> Bruce
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> Enter:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ICG-D-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 156 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Fiddling around with names…

If you haven’t been reading ICG-D there’s a big discussion (mostly
instigated by myself and Kevin this afternoon) raging over changing the
division names, and replacing Master/Journeyman/Novice with
Open/Intermediate/Beginner. I went to the guidelines draft I’ve been
working on and did a careful find-and-replace on the division names.

(forwarded from ICG-D)

> You can see (if you can read word documents) what it looks like at
> http://www.bovil.com/icg/GuidelinesRewrite4.doc
>
> Just scroll down to the second half (the new draft) and find the skill
> division section.
>
> Forgive a few spots where the phrasing is clumsy; the change in names
> does necessitate a bit of tweaking of the surrounding language that I
> didn’t take the time to do. For the most part, though, a simple
> plug-replace worked pretty well.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 157 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Judging — many new questions

On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 10:19 PM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> Regarding Bruce’s questions – I haven’t read the original yet. My ICG-D
> box stands at 140 unread messages, and it’s likely to stay that way for
> at least the next few days.

you couldn’t be so lucky…

> I can answer some of the questions concerning CCXV, since I selected
> the
> MDs.

I think this sort of discussion will be very valuable in defining a
more standard “job description” for the position.

andy


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

read the FAQ… Ridicule: http://www.idiots-r-us.org/
read the FAQ… IBMWR: http://www.ibmwr.org/faq-files/
read the FAQ… AirList: http://www.airheads.org/faq.html
read the FAQ… Hoaxes & Urban Legends: http://urbanlegends.about.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 158 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/13/2003
Subject: Re: Fiddling around with names…

Andy,

While I agree that Master is not a great name, I dread the thought of
another 6 years of fighting. It was a very long and grizzly fight, and the
local meetings were as aggravating as the annual meetings – which went on
for hours. Those fights are what cost us many members, who dropped out of
the ICG because of the politiking. They kept Karen out for a long time, as
well!

IMHO, perhaps we could think of just changing the one “title” to
Experienced, rather than swamp the entire boat with one tsunami.

And discussions in my own house are now several decibels higher already!

Elaine

> If you haven’t been reading ICG-D there’s a big discussion (mostly
> instigated by myself and Kevin this afternoon) raging over changing the
> division names, and replacing Master/Journeyman/Novice with
> Open/Intermediate/Beginner. I went to the guidelines draft I’ve been
> working on and did a careful find-and-replace on the division names.

 

Group: runacc Message: 159 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/14/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

In a message dated 05/04/2003 6:59:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.

The Delaware Valley Costumers Guild hosted CostumeCon in Cherry Hill, NJ
(across the river from Philly) a few years back and found…
(1) the Californians were scared of snow (and this year we did have a
sufficient snow amounts during President’s Day weekend to scare even the East
Coasters).
(2) President’s Day weekend is also Valentine’s Day; our hotel restaurant
gave all its Saturday dinner tables to reserved couples and saved NONE for
hotel guests (the hotel restaurant was a subcontract).

I think Easter weekend weather and Sunday brunches are a lot less
conflict for a CostumeCon.
Joni Dashoff

 

Group: runacc Message: 160 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

In a message dated 05/05/2003 1:26:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> Sorry Betsy, but according to my records, we’ve held all three Baltimore
> area CC’s over Memorial Day weekend. That was Disclave’s weekend, and
> since Disclave did not generally do a masquerade, we offered a special
> rate to Disclave members who wanted to come to Costume Con just for the
> masquerades.

(snipped)

> We held CC-15
> in downtown Baltimore over Memorial Day weekend because all of the
> suburban hotels were now booked solid because of soccer tournaments in
> the area.

That’s correct. Betsy, you and your husband even gave me directions to
the nearest gas station and then how to get back to Disclave on Saturday
after theSF/F Masquerade..
I arrived at three AM, counted heads and coming up short went to the
Discave to yank Alan from his Social Class game with Hal Haag et al.
We got to bed at 3:30AM The fire alarms started at 5:30AM aand went on
for an hour (Alan slept through them all). Yes, that was the year of water in
which Disclave sunk.

> Given that, and the fact that BaltiCon [very costumer friendly
> for those of you who never been] is now on Memorial Day weekend, I would
> doubt that we will see any East Coast CC’s using that weekend.
>
> ^M^
>

Long live Balticon and Caplave.

As for CostumeCon, last week of April/first week of May sounds like nice
weather, no religious conflicts, no major con conflicts, and if the kids are
stuck in school, its a great reason to get to travel alone!

BTW, SFWA has gone through the same discussion after holding its Nebulas
weekend over Easter/Passover this year. There were some members who had
religious conflicts but more who had major regional SF/F con conflicts, a
real drag when your membership base is the SF/F authors.
Joni

 

Group: runacc Message: 161 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

From: <JBdashoff@aol.com>

> The Delaware Valley Costumers Guild hosted CostumeCon in Cherry Hill, NJ
> (across the river from Philly) a few years back and found…
> (1) the Californians were scared of snow (and this year we did have a
> sufficient snow amounts during President’s Day weekend to scare even the

East

> Coasters).

“The Californians” (by which I mean everybody but myself, Kevin and Jess
Miller) haven’t traveled east for anything in years. The last CC with any
significant California presence was CC16. There were 6 of us (ourselves,
Janet Anderson, Deb Salisbury and the MacDermotts) if I remember correctly.
Granted Kevin and I skipped CC20, 19 and 18 (money/conflict, conflict and
conflict) but at this point I’d call the snow an excuse, not a reason.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 162 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

From: “Andrew T Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>

> “The Californians” (by which I mean everybody but myself, Kevin and Jess
> Miller) haven’t traveled east for anything in years. The last CC with any
> significant California presence was CC16. There were 6 of us (ourselves,
> Janet Anderson, Deb Salisbury and the MacDermotts) if I remember

correctly.

Sorry, forgot to finish that sentence. There were only 6 of us at CC21.

CC16 included Bridget Landry, Bruce Briant, Kate Morgenstern, Jess Miller,
Darla Krueger and more folks I’m spacing at the moment. Of course, I wasn’t
a Californian at that point.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 163 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

I’m sorry, but that is not correct. CC 9 was February 15-18, 1991. We drove through a snow storm in northeastern Pennsylvania to get to it. It snowed during the con and I recall CGW members dancing out in the snow as it fell.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: JBdashoff@aol.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Date ideas

In a message dated 05/05/2003 1:26:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> Sorry Betsy, but according to my records, we’ve held all three Baltimore
> area CC’s over Memorial Day weekend. That was Disclave’s weekend, and
> since Disclave did not generally do a masquerade, we offered a special
> rate to Disclave members who wanted to come to Costume Con just for the
> masquerades.
(snipped)
> We held CC-15
> in downtown Baltimore over Memorial Day weekend because all of the
> suburban hotels were now booked solid because of soccer tournaments in
> the area.
That’s correct. Betsy, you and your husband even gave me directions to
the nearest gas station and then how to get back to Disclave on Saturday
after theSF/F Masquerade..
I arrived at three AM, counted heads and coming up short went to the
Discave to yank Alan from his Social Class game with Hal Haag et al.
We got to bed at 3:30AM The fire alarms started at 5:30AM aand went on
for an hour (Alan slept through them all). Yes, that was the year of water in
which Disclave sunk.

> Given that, and the fact that BaltiCon [very costumer friendly
> for those of you who never been] is now on Memorial Day weekend, I would
> doubt that we will see any East Coast CC’s using that weekend.
>
> ^M^
>
Long live Balticon and Caplave.

As for CostumeCon, last week of April/first week of May sounds like nice
weather, no religious conflicts, no major con conflicts, and if the kids are
stuck in school, its a great reason to get to travel alone!

BTW, SFWA has gone through the same discussion after holding its Nebulas
weekend over Easter/Passover this year. There were some members who had
religious conflicts but more who had major regional SF/F con conflicts, a
real drag when your membership base is the SF/F authors.
Joni

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 164 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Fwd: [ICG-D] CCXV

pertinent to our discussion…

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Catelli <catelli@rcn.com>
> Date: Thu May 15, 2003 4:46:24 AM US/Pacific
> To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [ICG-D] CCXV
> Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>
> One thing that slipped at CCXV, was that no one considered Ninjas to be
> their department.
>
> I looked to sign up to be a ninja. There was no sign-up sheet, even.
>
> So I panicked at everyone I ran into & gathered together a crew.
> Betsy modestly backed away from the lectern & fell off the stage during
> an awards ceremony.
>
>
> I did have some issues with the Green Room staff–the postage stamp
> room
> was filled with tables, and the heads of Green Room laughed at my
> suggestion that we strike the tables before anyone arrived. In the
> event, they waited until the room was full of costumers, and then
> struck
> them, for only 1/2-1/3 of the entrants had arrived at that point.
>
> Ann in CT


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
…remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio

 

Group: runacc Message: 165 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: [ICG-D] CCXV

You betcha!

Concerning this issue: It was my impression that once the MDs took over,
they were responsible for collecting these names. That it fell through
the cracks is news to me, six years after the fact, but it would explain
the dearth of catchers at the con.

The fall I took brings up two points. First, the stage was set with a
very large hole behind the podium, to bring the MC away from the stage.
I think that this is a Very Bad Idea ™ for the obvious reason that
falls can happen. I was VERY careful while walking around the stage at
CC21 for that very reason. Having cracked ribs once, at the con I was
running, I was disinclined to do so again at a con for which I was not
responsible.

Since my fall, I have advocated, when asked, that anyone who expects to
have something to do with a stage should be signing a release form
holding the con harmless should an injury occur during the weekend. This
should include judges, techies, MCs and competition coordinators as
well.

Liability releases were not available at CC21 until I asked about them
for our group. By then, the text we used for CCXV was safely at home, in
my archives. While a blanket release for photography was a good idea,
missing the other can get the con committee into a great deal of hot
water if anyone is actually hurt during an event. Just ask the con com
from Magicon.

While we’re thinking about things to add to the document, I think that
we should consider providing sample releases. We should also consider
generating some sort of at-con checklist for committees to use, so that
they can have an easy reference for management holes in their staff.

Finally, I can’t speak for why Ann was poo-pooed (if this was the case)
in the greenroom, but I don’t think anyone really thought about the
amount of necessary personal space 105 contestant bodies would actually
take up in the space allotted. This was something that should probably
have been identified by the MD as a potential problem before the
greenroom call occurred. Again, we should consider providing guidance on
the subject.

Sometimes there’s nothing you can do with the greenroom space because of
the configuration of the hotel. We saw that with CC21. Improvisation is
necessary. So is patience and understanding. Blowing someone off without
good reason is never a good idea, at any time.

If anyone has questions about decisions made during that weekend, just
ask. I promise to answer to the best of my ability (and memory).

Meanwhile, I expect to be away from the computer a substantial amount
over the next several days – my sister and her family are in town until
Tuesday, and we have a wedding this weekend in which we are heavily
involved. After they leave, I have the remains of our family room floor
to paint, and everything to put back into its proper place, as well as
the last five CCs to reconfigure, and CC21’s data to add. So if you have
a question and I don’t get back to you immediately, now you know why.

Cheers,

Betsy

Andrew Trembley wrote:

>
> pertinent to our discussion…
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Catelli <catelli@rcn.com>
> > Date: Thu May 15, 2003 4:46:24 AM US/Pacific
> > To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [ICG-D] CCXV
> > Reply-To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > One thing that slipped at CCXV, was that no one considered Ninjas to be
> > their department.
> >
> > I looked to sign up to be a ninja. There was no sign-up sheet, even.
> >
> > So I panicked at everyone I ran into & gathered together a crew.
> > Betsy modestly backed away from the lectern & fell off the stage during
> > an awards ceremony.
> >
> >
> > I did have some issues with the Green Room staff–the postage stamp
> > room
> > was filled with tables, and the heads of Green Room laughed at my
> > suggestion that we strike the tables before anyone arrived. In the
> > event, they waited until the room was full of costumers, and then
> > struck
> > them, for only 1/2-1/3 of the entrants had arrived at that point.
> >
> > Ann in CT
>
> —
> andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
> San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
> (Kevin’s)
> …remaining .sig trimmed for better message/.sig ratio
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 166 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/15/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

It’s true. They danced in the flakes, then the Pups did our tribute to The
Ring Cycle.

Elaine

> I’m sorry, but that is not correct. CC 9 was February 15-18, 1991. We

drove through a snow storm in northeastern Pennsylvania to get to it. It
snowed during the con and I recall CGW members dancing out in the snow as it
fell.

>
> Byron
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 167 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/17/2003
Subject: Fw (from a new CC attendee): CC21 and ICG questions

forwarded with Allison’s permission

—– Original Message —–
From: “Allison Pace” <allivox@comcast.net>
> On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 09:03 PM, ICG-D@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
> > I think perhaps we need a “Newcomer’s guide to Costume-Con” (oy…

> Hear hear!

> > Speaking of questions, I wrote one of those rule sets. I’m curious
> > about the bits that you found confusing. Can you drop me a note at
> > attrembl@bovil.com with your specific comments on the rules?

> Since I’ve got CC21 behind me, I “get it.” So NOW I can re-read the
> Progress Reports and see what they meant. But I would’ve been more on
> top of things (no jokes please – I’ve checked out your website, and
> Kevin’s :-)) if I had had someone explain to me thusly: “Okay, Allison
> – Costume Con is an event based on the model of Science Fiction/Fantasy
> events that have been going on for decades, and this particular event
> includes the category of Historical Costuming, too.” <and then they’d
> have to ‘splain to me what SF/F Cons were…> “It’s not anything
> ‘official’ – it’s just a motley collection of people who are willing to
> put a lot of organization and effort into their hobby.” The event I
> especially didn’t understand was the “Future Fashion Folio.” I thought
> it was some competition for up-and-coming designers so that fashion
> apparel manufacturers might sponsor so as to find new designs and new
> talent. But the categories were too funky for that, so I really had no
> idea what that was all about. And the masquerades were a bit
> confusing, because there was mention of staging and lighting and other
> production elements. So the actress in me thought – “Oh – not just
> showing off your work, but a whole mini-production! Too much tech for
> me before seeing how it works! ” But like I said above, now that I’ve
> been to my first CC, I feel much more comfy with what goes on and I’m
> willing to schlep (schlepp? how many p’s?) a bunch of stuff with me and
> not feeling like I’ve overdone it.
>
> Bottom line is this: the Progress Reports do exactly what they need to
> for those who have been there. But for someone as completely in the
> dark as I was, they seem to be written for those who are already a part
> of the “in crowd.” Maybe there is no solution, maybe each newcomer
> needs to go through this, to figure out for themselves how they will
> participate.

 

Group: runacc Message: 168 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/17/2003
Subject: Newcomers
Nora and I do some of our best brainstorming in the car while running
errands. Nora had a couple of very good ideas I think folks ought to
consider in the future:

1. Create a position like “Newbie Liason”. It’s sort of the same idea that
Betsy mentined of the “ambassadors”, only having one person specificaly
charged iwth coming up with ideas to bring the vifgins more quickly into the
community.

We had a new person from our group speak of how “exclusinve” the ICG felt to
her in her first CC experience (never mind that a lot of the CC attendees
aren’t even ICG — she doesn’t understand the format yet). Well, I think
she was expecting people to seek her out, and that’s generally not what
people do as a rule. Sure, there are individuals who try to make an effort,
but they ususally can’t find them all or have the time because they’re
con-goers themselves.

For CC16, we had a ribbon or something to identify new people, and
encouraged all the con-goers to approach them. Not sure how successful that
was specifically, but people liked the con. I had any number of people I
didn’t know that stopped me to say they were having a great time.

Anyway, expanding upon this idea, the Liason could maybe actually give a
tour of the con. They would maybe start with a panel (find out who they
are, where they come from, their backgrouind), then take them around and
show them the Exhibits, the Dealers room, where the masqs and Green Room
are, the Con Suite, what to expect at panels, etc. Also included would be
some sort of “Meet the Vets” session, or at least buttonhole the “names” of
Costuming and introduce them to folks so they would have at least passing
familiarity with people we all mention often in a group. And, that would
include most of you here, like Ricky and Karen, Marty, the Hylls, Carl &
Elaine, Jacqui, the Pettingers, the MacDermotts — people like that.
Maybe the Liason could have a photo album with sample works, just in case.
I think this would work better than a panel, because I just don’t think
people would go to a panel of people telling all about themselves. Maybe
this part could be done in the Con Suite at some point.

I think this could be a fun job!

2. The other idea I wish we’d thought of before CC21, but maybe we can do
it in the future. Frequently, the CC chairs will give away a membership or
two at various masq competitions to BIS winner(s) and/or the Most Promising
Novice (I love that award title). But they pretty much are a nobody when
they come to a CC if they’ve never been before. So why not introduce them
onstage at some point — like during the half-tim? We could could give a
brief bio about them, what year, what they did, maybe even show a picture or
have them bring a part of their outfits if they aren’t competing.

If we’re going to make a big deal about the fact that they won a membership
to a CC, let’s make sure it’s a big deal that they’re there.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 169 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Dealers Room
This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.

Henry:

Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
fair?

Thanks.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 170 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Historical Masq
Does anyone have a list yet of the Historical Masq participants?

Thanks.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 171 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>

> Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
> very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
> willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not?

Business isn’t necessarily fair, that’s why it’s business.

Juried dealers rooms are unfair to the folks who don’t make it through the
jury process. Lotteried dealers rooms are unfair to the folks who lose out
in the lottery. Business is in general unfair to folks who have less
desirable products.

On the theoretical end of things, I agree with your position. If a dealer is
willing to pay for the space and is capable of filling the space, sell the
space to her or him.

AlterYears brings a broad and desirable line of products. Part of Janet’s
product line was in direct competition with Poison Pen Press. Her trims were
not directly in competition with the trim merchant; they had greatly
differing styles and stocks. The rest of the dealers didn’t really carry the
same product lines as Janet, so it was really no more competition to them
than any of the other dealers who carried different product lines. Is it any
more or less fair to the other dealers that AlterYears filled that room than
it would have been if 6 separate dealers filled that room?

Dealers make up a small portion of convention attendees. They do bring
something very important to the con, but their needs and desires need to be
balanced with the needs and desires of the rest of the membership.

I couldn’t have cared less that AlterYears was in that dealers’ room (even
if I did buy 2 books from Janet) because I see them at cons all the time.
That’s not the case for midwest and east-coast attendees who don’t and may
only know them through mail-order. At that point members of the con-com
could have said “we’d like to see AlterYears here, and we think other
attendees would too.”

You can set hard-and-fast rules, but sometimes it’s best to acknowledge that
bending them will result in a better show or a better con for the attendees.
As long as you’re honest that you are bending the rules and have a good
reason why, most folks will accept that.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 172 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Historical Masq

That would be me. As soon as my sister is gone, I’m working on getting
all the participants and awards up on the site.

Henry or Jennifer: Please, please, please!!! Send me the doll contest
names and awards. REALLY!!!

Thanks,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Does anyone have a list yet of the Historical Masq participants?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 173 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Bruce,
I was dealers room guy for CC-5 & 9

I feel the con and everyone are better serve by one big dealers room with
all dealers in it. It increases traffic flow for everyone concerned.
It also allows at least the chance that one new dealer with one little
table of worthwhile stuff doesn’t get ignored.

If thats the case, I really don’t have a big problem with how many tables
one dealer gets as long as there is a fair cross section of items availible .
For instance, lets say there are 30 tables in a room.Janet wants 10
that other trim guy that was there this time wants 5.
half the room is gone. maybe you should think twice before selling another
5 to a new trim guy.

It looked like there was no chance of one big room in Chicago, and I would
have probably handled it just as they did, IF I’m assuming they weren’t
turning down dozens of dealers.

I was talking to Nora in Chicago, and she mentioned Janet wanting her own room.
My thought then and now is that con space costs alot. I would hope that she
would be charged a price that would pay for twice the price of what the
hotel is charging, that way you’re paying for some of the other functions
space.
I always ran a dealers room to make money for the con.
At CC- 5 we put the exhibits into the dealer room to increase traffic flow.
I sold the tables at a cost to totally pay for the room, and that way our
exhibit space was essentially free.

How impotant is it for Alteryears to be there? I assume you mean to the con?
it’s not, there are other companies that can fill the bill, but there
should at least be a nod at loyalty to a long time dealer at CC and friend
of the con.

Of course if it’s a well attended CC, then it’s much more important TO
Alteryears to be there ( lets not forget the real reason Costume College
was founded) so a committee shouldn’t sell itself short.
She’s a smart business person, when its not worth it to her, she won’t be
there.

Ricky

it

>This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.
>
>Henry:
>
>Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
>dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
>very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
>willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
>important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
>brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
>fair?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 174 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

My personal opinion here:

I think my recommendation would be to limit tables based on the number
of available spaces, and only give exceptions to dealers who are already
signed up (first come, first served) for expansion when the con is
within a month or so of the date. Why? Because if you can’t fill the
room, you can then give the dealers the opportunity to expand. If you’re
overrun with dealers who want the space, a variety is a good thing.

I think we played it by ear for CC, and then when we got to the con and
several dealers were unable to show, we gave other dealers the
opportunity to expand into the spaces left open. I didn’t hear any
complaints from anyone at the con concerning the change.

My suggested limit would be based on the total size of the room. I would
be tempted (and I think we did this at CCXV) to limit to two per dealer
unless special arrangements were requested. Three was the absolute
maximum.

Note that my recollection is fuzzy, and that my dealer room coordinator
bailed out on me less than six months prior to the con, leaving me with
the icky task of following up on the work she didn’t do myself. I
learned more than I ever want to know about how to run a dealer room
after that little fiasco.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.
>
> Henry:
>
> Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
> very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
> willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
> important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
> brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
> fair?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bruce


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 175 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

For Janet to bring that much stuff, and the people to staff the room, it had
to be costly. I feel that any dealer who has the where-withall to
transport, and the quality and variety of merchandise, should be allowed to.
The attendees benefit!

I personally would have preferred to see all the dealers in one room, but it
isn’t always possible to get a room big enough. Knowing that a CC will be
having a kick-ass dealers’ room(s) can be a big draw.

Elaine

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room

> This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of
you.
>
> Henry:
>
> Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
> very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
> willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
> important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
> brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
> fair?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 176 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Has CC ever considered doing what other S/F conventions have done–book a
block of rooms on one floor of the hotel and turn them into Dealer’s Row?

This has the advantage of (1) not limiting dealer space, (2) letting
dealers set their own hours, (3) dealers with clothing items have built-in
“dressing rooms” (bathroom). It also frees up regular convention function
space for panels and displays.

Thoughts?

–Karen

At 09:47 PM 5/18/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>For Janet to bring that much stuff, and the people to staff the room, it had
>to be costly. I feel that any dealer who has the where-withall to
>transport, and the quality and variety of merchandise, should be allowed to.
>The attendees benefit!
>
>I personally would have preferred to see all the dealers in one room, but it
>isn’t always possible to get a room big enough. Knowing that a CC will be
>having a kick-ass dealers’ room(s) can be a big draw.
>
>Elaine
>
>—– Original Message —–
>From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 6:15 PM
>Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
>
>
> > This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of
>you.
> >
> > Henry:
> >
> > Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
> > dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
> > very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
> > willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
> > important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
> > brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
> > fair?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 177 From: Karen Heim Date: 5/18/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Elaine Mami wrote:

> Knowing that a CC will be
>having a kick-ass dealers’ room(s) can be a big draw.
>

It is for me (even if I don’t end up spending a lot – my money is kinda
tight). Especially when buying books, I REALLY want to see what’s in it
before forking over $20+, so I can make wise decisions.

And Karen Dick wrote:

Has CC ever considered doing what other S/F conventions have done–book a
block of rooms on one floor of the hotel and turn them into Dealer’s Row?

This has the advantage of (1) not limiting dealer space, (2) letting
dealers set their own hours, (3) dealers with clothing items have built-in
“dressing rooms” (bathroom). It also frees up regular convention function
space for panels and displays.

I’ve seen this, and I have mixed feelings. I like the idea in concept,
but want to be sensitive to other hotel patrons. It could get rather noisy.

At one convention, the rooms have rear sliding doors that open up into a
central atrium, where the games and pool are located. I like this,
because you expect that area to be noisier.

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 178 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has
indicated an interest in bring her truck full of stuff to Atlanta. At the
moment, I don’t really have anywhere to put her. Our space is at a premium.
Even though we have the entire convention area, it ain’t that big. I can
fit 14 tables and the doll exhibit into our dealer’s room. I could fit more
if I put tables down the middle of the room, but I am hoping to have enough
space for people to move comfortably. There is another space that I might
be able to get from the hotel, but it won’t be in the convention area, but
will be just off the hotel lobby. I would love for the folks here who don’t
have access to a G Street, or Alter Years or some other source for all the
historical patterns, accessories, etc, to have a chance to buy some of these
things. On the other hand, Poison Pen is already booked as one of the
dealers, and I hate to lessen her sales (even if it is “business”).

I’m not too keen on the “selling out of a hotel room” idea. I don’t think
you would do as well if folks had to find you and not have you right there
in the traffic flow. One of the reasons, besides space, that we are putting
the dolls in the dealers room is to increase the traffic for both.

Trudy

>From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:15:03 -0500
>
>This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.
>
>Henry:
>
>Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
>dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
>very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
>willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
>important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
>brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
>fair?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

 

Group: runacc Message: 179 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>

> Has CC ever considered doing what other S/F conventions have done–book a
> block of rooms on one floor of the hotel and turn them into Dealer’s Row?

I’ve been on the dealers’-table side of this.

It rots.

It rots big time.

I would never deal at a convention under these conditions again.

Having to turn one’s room into dealer space is bad. Folks knocking at all
hours makes it worse.

It’s a bad thing.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 180 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

I can see a good question here. It sounds like you are considering a space for Dealers similar to the size we were considering. And then I met one of our prospective dealers in action, and realized that a fabric vendor can take up twice the room I had figured.

We can expand into a larger space (the ballroom), which we may do, but it would be significantly more $. And I think we will try to limit the number of vendors while still trying to keep a good variety. (Since many of the vendors are probably coming in from out of area, they risk more. Local vendors at a local con have lower costs, and can use the exposure for publicity.)

And I think putting exhibits in/close to vendors is a good idea.

What’s the square footage of the room you were considering?

Charles

Message—–
From: Trudy Leonard <georgialei@hotmail.com>

I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has

>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 181 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers

I think that both of these ideas are quite good. As most (if not all) of
you are aware, I seldom costume, and mostly work backstage in the Green
Room. Therefore, even though I’ve been to most CC’s from CC3 onward, as
well as many Worldcons and East Coast regionals, my perspective isn’t quite
the same as that of people who have been seasoned costumers for lo – these
many years. I thought that the newbie ribbons at CC16 were a GREAT idea,
and in fact have been rather surprised that it hasn’t been done (in any
organized sense) since.

For CC18 (I got stuck with doing all of the publications except the FFF) I
created a sort of “Hello new costumers” FAQ sheet. It did not,
unfortunately, address all aspects of CC’s, and at this point is somewhat
dated (for instance, the information regarding tape vs. CD for sound track),
and does not explain any of the jargon, such as stage right/stage left and
lighting terminalogy, but it was an attempt to answer a lot of the most
basic questions on one double-sided page. I’m attaching it, in both
WordPerfect and MSWord (ptooey!) formats, FYI. It might serve as a jumping
off point, or you may find bits of it worth including in a new and improved
equivalent.

Allison Pace’s comments, forwarded by Andy Trembley, were also quite
illuminating, and indeed, some sort of overview would also help to remind
the old guard what CC is all about — perhaps an inserted “Intro to CC”
sheet tucked inside the front cover of Progress Report 1 (and handed out
with later publications to new members who join after later PR’s are out).
There are, I am sure, other CC hangers-on such as myself who seldom appear
on stage and whose grasp of the more technical aspects is weak, at best.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: “Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: [runacc] Newcomers

> Nora and I do some of our best brainstorming in the car while running
> errands. Nora had a couple of very good ideas I think folks ought to
> consider in the future:
>
> 1. Create a position like “Newbie Liason”. It’s sort of the same idea
that
> Betsy mentined of the “ambassadors”, only having one person specificaly
> charged iwth coming up with ideas to bring the vifgins more quickly into
the
> community.
>
> We had a new person from our group speak of how “exclusinve” the ICG felt
to
> her in her first CC experience (never mind that a lot of the CC attendees
> aren’t even ICG — she doesn’t understand the format yet). Well, I think
> she was expecting people to seek her out, and that’s generally not what
> people do as a rule. Sure, there are individuals who try to make an
effort,
> but they ususally can’t find them all or have the time because they’re
> con-goers themselves.
>
> For CC16, we had a ribbon or something to identify new people, and
> encouraged all the con-goers to approach them. Not sure how successful
that
> was specifically, but people liked the con. I had any number of people I
> didn’t know that stopped me to say they were having a great time.
>
> Anyway, expanding upon this idea, the Liason could maybe actually give a
> tour of the con. They would maybe start with a panel (find out who they
> are, where they come from, their backgrouind), then take them around and
> show them the Exhibits, the Dealers room, where the masqs and Green Room
> are, the Con Suite, what to expect at panels, etc. Also included would be
> some sort of “Meet the Vets” session, or at least buttonhole the “names”
of
> Costuming and introduce them to folks so they would have at least passing
> familiarity with people we all mention often in a group. And, that would
> include most of you here, like Ricky and Karen, Marty, the Hylls, Carl &
> Elaine, Jacqui, the Pettingers, the MacDermotts — people like that.
> Maybe the Liason could have a photo album with sample works, just in case.
> I think this would work better than a panel, because I just don’t think
> people would go to a panel of people telling all about themselves. Maybe
> this part could be done in the Con Suite at some point.
>
> I think this could be a fun job!
>
> 2. The other idea I wish we’d thought of before CC21, but maybe we can do
> it in the future. Frequently, the CC chairs will give away a membership
or
> two at various masq competitions to BIS winner(s) and/or the Most
Promising
> Novice (I love that award title). But they pretty much are a nobody when
> they come to a CC if they’ve never been before. So why not introduce them
> onstage at some point — like during the half-tim? We could could give a
> brief bio about them, what year, what they did, maybe even show a picture
or
> have them bring a part of their outfits if they aren’t competing.
>
> If we’re going to make a big deal about the fact that they won a
membership
> to a CC, let’s make sure it’s a big deal that they’re there.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

———-

WPCX

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 182 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Bruce, and all,
I believe that Jennifer Kelley is part of this group, but I will
forward your question to her, as well as Kyym Kimple, the guy who ran our
Dealers’ Room.
In my opinion, if dealer wants to “buy” half the area, so what?
Janet/AlterYears had a nice variety of stuff, so it worked out well. I’d have
a problem with a dealer buying so much space if the only had one item to
sell. One of the perks of having AlterYears there is that I have heard that
they sometimes have problems getting mail orders out, so you could buy it and
get it in your hands. I also remember Janet mentioning that CC21 was the
first CC she had been to in some time, but that is aside to the issue of the
Dealers’ Room.
The biggest thing that we, the CC21 staff, was concerned about was
having a balance of dealers. We didn’t want wall-to-wall garb dealers, all
with the same garb. That would be unfair to both dealers and attendees.
If I hear from Jennifer or Kyym about the subject, I’ll forward
their comments to the list.
Henry
PS Bruce & Nora, on a personal note, after going to your CC, the
Milwaukee CC21 staff really wanted to get Clearwater Hats, but they had
something else going that weekend!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 183 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Historical Masq

In a message dated 5/18/2003 5:15:58 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> Does anyone have a list yet of the Historical Masq participants?

I have it stowed away in some file. I believe it also went out via the ICG
e-group as well. I’ll look around for it and send it out, unless someone else
beats me to it!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 184 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

We’ve done this at regular cons, clown cons, and magic cons, and hopefully
will be doing it at Arisia this year.

We love.

We love it big time

I would always be willing to consider this

>Having to turn one’s room into dealer space is bad.

Turning youre room into a dealers room is great. makes your own hours, and
the more they partied at night the more they spent.

>Folks knocking at all
>hours makes it worse.

so we hung a sign on the door to explain things, but since we’re night owls
it wasn’t a problem.

>It’s a bad thing.

It’s wonderful

however, one big dealers room is still best, this is a way to expand if
you’re short on space.

Ricky

 

Group: runacc Message: 185 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

In a message dated 5/18/2003 9:12:30 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> Has CC ever considered doing what other S/F conventions have done–book a
> block of rooms on one floor of the hotel and turn them into Dealer’s Row?

I worked a convention in the Chicagoland area that only ran one year. It did
that. All those things you mentioned, like dealers set their own hours,
dressing rooms, bathrooms, were nice. But, on the down-side, they are limited
to area, and the con’s income suffers because of it. We set up our Dealers’
Room prices so that those rooms pay for themselves. A dealer like AlterYears
needed the space we had. Also, I know that the dealers like to socialize
amongst themselves and some we had lived close by, so they went home every
night and saved money.
At best, I see the Dealers’ Room vs. Dealers’ Row/Floor question as
a six-of-one,-half-dozen-of-the-other situation.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 186 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
Re Dealers’ Row versus Dealers’ Room –
Arisia does this and many of the dealers love it for all of the reasons
that Ricky mentioned. Those who don’t like it either go into the “main”
dealers’ room or don’t go to Arisia. Arisia is very lucky in that they
have the Park Plaza which is large enough that they can turn over half a
floor (or more) to a dealers’ row and then throw in a con suite and/or
green room and not disturb anyone who is not part of the convention. On
the other hand many hotels have said, “Absolutely NOT!” so it really
depends upon venue.

^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 187 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room
The only time I’ve seen the Dealer’s Row work well from a buyer perspective
(i.e’ not having to hunt down the section of the hotel they’re in) is as
KarenH mentioned before.
The rooms at the hotel in question has sliding glass doors on one side
(standard entrance at the other) which open out onto a boradwalk alongside
an enclosed pool/recreation atrium with a bar and tables. This worked well
because people were strolling through that area to get to other function
rooms and it worked a little like an open-air (albeit covered) bazaar. Very
nice, actually. But in most hotels it doesn’t seem to work very well.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 188 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

My subjective impression is that CC dealers’ rooms have gotten smaller over the years and have come to have less variety of wares than they used to. I certainly hope that you can reverse that. The ability to list AlterYears in PRs as one of the confirmed dealers can be a very good draw, especially in an area that has less access to major costume supply sources.

I believe that, on the East Coast, Arisia is the only SF con that consistently has a dealers’ row of hotel rooms as well as a dealers’ room. While this arrangement certainly is convenient for dealers who can set their own hours, such dealers may have a disadvantage in comparison to those in the dealers’ room. I do know that there have been years when I have never gotten to Arisia’s dealers’ row but have concentrated on the dealers’ room. I wonder if others have had similar experiences.

I don’t know about putting the doll exhibit in the same room with the dealers. I would prefer to keep them separate, if possible, and put the dolls elsewhere, perhaps in thee same space as a costume exhibit, as CC 21 did. I say this because I am concerned that the dolls may get lost in the hubbub of a dealers’ room while, at the same time, eating up space the con otherwise could rent to additional dealers. The doll display may be an attraction that will bring in members, but the dealers’ room is one of the con’s few income centers and every available inch should be rented to dealers.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Trudy Leonard
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room

I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has
indicated an interest in bring her truck full of stuff to Atlanta. At the
moment, I don’t really have anywhere to put her. Our space is at a premium.
Even though we have the entire convention area, it ain’t that big. I can
fit 14 tables and the doll exhibit into our dealer’s room. I could fit more
if I put tables down the middle of the room, but I am hoping to have enough
space for people to move comfortably. There is another space that I might
be able to get from the hotel, but it won’t be in the convention area, but
will be just off the hotel lobby. I would love for the folks here who don’t
have access to a G Street, or Alter Years or some other source for all the
historical patterns, accessories, etc, to have a chance to buy some of these
things. On the other hand, Poison Pen is already booked as one of the
dealers, and I hate to lessen her sales (even if it is “business”).

I’m not too keen on the “selling out of a hotel room” idea. I don’t think
you would do as well if folks had to find you and not have you right there
in the traffic flow. One of the reasons, besides space, that we are putting
the dolls in the dealers room is to increase the traffic for both.

Trudy

>From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:15:03 -0500
>
>This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.
>
>Henry:
>
>Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
>dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
>very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
>willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
>important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
>brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
>fair?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 189 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

At 08:01 PM 5/19/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>I don’t know about putting the doll exhibit in the same room with the
>dealers. I would prefer to keep them separate, if possible, and put the
>dolls elsewhere, perhaps in thee same space as a costume exhibit, as CC 21
>did. I say this because I am concerned that the dolls may get lost in the
>hubbub of a dealers’ room while, at the same time, eating up space the con
>otherwise could rent to additional dealers. The doll display may be an
>attraction that will bring in members, but the dealers’ room is one of the
>con’s few income centers and every available inch should be rented to dealers.

Another comment along these same lines–

CC-4 mixed exhibits and dealers, and I was always afraid attendees wouldn’t
understand what was for sale and what wasn’t (this applies to the doll
contest also). Best to keep sales stuff and not for sale stuff separate.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 190 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/19/2003
Subject: Exhibits/Dealers (was Re: Dealers Room)

On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 06:09 PM, Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

> CC-4 mixed exhibits and dealers, and I was always afraid attendees
> wouldn’t
> understand what was for sale and what wasn’t (this applies to the doll
> contest also). Best to keep sales stuff and not for sale stuff
> separate.

CC17 had the doll exhibit at one end of the dealers’ room. It was
fairly small, and obviously wasn’t connected to the dealers’ tables. Of
course, the dealers weren’t tightly packed into that space.

It was rather nice because the doll exhibit was very prominent, but I
can understand that how well this works is greatly dependent on the
space and the people.

If there’s tons of space, putting exhibits in the same room as dealers
can increase traffic through exhibits, and that’s a good thing. If
space is tight, putting exhibits in the same room as dealers will
result in confusion and a traffic jam, which is a bad thing.

I don’t think this is something we can answer in anything more than the
vaguest terms in our CC Runner’s Guide.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 191 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

I have to agree with Byron, from the shoppers’ point of view. At CC17, the
dolls were in the dealers’ room, and I saw many people pass them with a
glance while heading for the tables. Others, like myself, were in the way
of the shoppers as we tried to stand still and enjoy the display.

At CCs 16 & 21, I was able to enjoy the dolls and the exhibits in the
relative calm that the dealers’ room lacked.

Elaine

> My subjective impression is that CC dealers’ rooms have gotten smaller

over the years and have come to have less variety of wares than they used
to. I certainly hope that you can reverse that. The ability to list
AlterYears in PRs as one of the confirmed dealers can be a very good draw,
especially in an area that has less access to major costume supply sources.

>
> I believe that, on the East Coast, Arisia is the only SF con that

consistently has a dealers’ row of hotel rooms as well as a dealers’ room.
While this arrangement certainly is convenient for dealers who can set their
own hours, such dealers may have a disadvantage in comparison to those in
the dealers’ room. I do know that there have been years when I have never
gotten to Arisia’s dealers’ row but have concentrated on the dealers’ room.
I wonder if others have had similar experiences.

>
> I don’t know about putting the doll exhibit in the same room with the

dealers. I would prefer to keep them separate, if possible, and put the
dolls elsewhere, perhaps in thee same space as a costume exhibit, as CC 21
did. I say this because I am concerned that the dolls may get lost in the
hubbub of a dealers’ room while, at the same time, eating up space the con
otherwise could rent to additional dealers. The doll display may be an
attraction that will bring in members, but the dealers’ room is one of the
con’s few income centers and every available inch should be rented to
dealers.

>
> Byron

 

Group: runacc Message: 192 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

Well, for starters, what would Janet think about being put in a room away from the other dealers’ room? Or are you saying that there is a larger room off the lobby which would accommodate bothe Alter Years and the other dealers as well? Off the lobby could have its advantages. BTW, I looked pretty closely at the books offered by both Poison Pen and Alter Years (as did Byron) and there really wasn’t a lot of overlap. It was nice having the extra variety. I bought books from both of them. And speaking of variety, FABRIC! We hardly ever see it in dealers rooms. If you can get a fabric dealer in, that would be a good thing! (Assuming the dealer has decent stuff.)

Incidentally, if I were making the decision I wouldn’t put the dolls in Dealers. Too much chance for them to get damaged, and if they’re near a popular dealer, not very accessible after all.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: Trudy Leonard
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Dealers Room

I’m very interested in hearing everyone’s thoughts on this. Janet has
indicated an interest in bring her truck full of stuff to Atlanta. At the
moment, I don’t really have anywhere to put her. Our space is at a premium.
Even though we have the entire convention area, it ain’t that big. I can
fit 14 tables and the doll exhibit into our dealer’s room. I could fit more
if I put tables down the middle of the room, but I am hoping to have enough
space for people to move comfortably. There is another space that I might
be able to get from the hotel, but it won’t be in the convention area, but
will be just off the hotel lobby. I would love for the folks here who don’t
have access to a G Street, or Alter Years or some other source for all the
historical patterns, accessories, etc, to have a chance to buy some of these
things. On the other hand, Poison Pen is already booked as one of the
dealers, and I hate to lessen her sales (even if it is “business”).

I’m not too keen on the “selling out of a hotel room” idea. I don’t think
you would do as well if folks had to find you and not have you right there
in the traffic flow. One of the reasons, besides space, that we are putting
the dolls in the dealers room is to increase the traffic for both.

Trudy

>From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Dealers Room
>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:15:03 -0500
>
>This is a question for Henry, but I’d like hear input from the rest of you.
>
>Henry:
>
>Can you ask your Liason about any feedback they got about how the other
>dealers felt about Janet having a room all to herself? Our Liason feels
>very strongly that this was very unfair to them. My position is, if she’s
>willing to come with all her stuff, and pay appropriately, why not? How
>important is it for AlterYears to be part of a mix, no matter how much she
>brings? Is limiting all dealers to a certain number of tables inherently
>fair?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 193 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers

I attached the files, but they went off into Never-Never Land, so I’m trying
again.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: “Tina Connell” <cvconnel@nycap.rr.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Newcomers

(snip)

For CC18 (I got stuck with doing all of the publications except the FFF) I
created a sort of “Hello new costumers” FAQ sheet. It did not,
unfortunately, address all aspects of CC’s, and at this point is somewhat
dated (for instance, the information regarding tape vs. CD for sound track),
and does not explain any of the jargon, such as stage right/stage left and
lighting terminalogy, but it was an attempt to answer a lot of the most
basic questions on one double-sided page. I’m attaching it, in both
WordPerfect and MSWord (ptooey!) formats, FYI. It might serve as a jumping
off point, or you may find bits of it worth including in a new and improved
equivalent.

———-

WPCX

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 194 From: Les Roth Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers

Tina,

I’m not sure that Yahoo groups will permit enclosures. Note the
“Non-Text” message below.

Les

Live, never to be ashamed if everything you do is published around the
world. Even if what is published is not true. — Richard Bach

On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 06:46 AM, Tina Connell wrote:

> I attached the files, but they went off into Never-Never Land, so I’m
> trying
> again.
>
> Tina
>
>

> ———-
>
> ÿWPCX
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ———————— Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ———————~–>
> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life’s Important
> Questions.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/xX1wlB/TM
> ———————————————————————
> ~->
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 195 From: betsy Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Newcomers

That’s correct. There is, however, a file transfer/upload facility available
through the main page of Yahoo Groups.

Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/ and you will find all the options
available to the members of this list on the left side of the window.

You may create folders, upload files and do all sorts of other nifty stuff
right there.

The system will even let people know when a file has been uploaded to the
system.

Cool, huh?

Betsy

On Tue, 20 May 2003 07:57:06 -0500, Les Roth wrote

> Tina,
>
> I’m not sure that Yahoo groups will permit enclosures. Note the
> “Non-Text” message below.
>
> Les


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large
WebInvent.com, Inc.

************************************************************************
www.WebInvent.com * www.Costume-Con.org * www.hawkeswood.com
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 196 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Dealers’ Room
Hello!
I got this response from Kyym Kimple, the guy who ran our Dealers’
Room at CC21.
Henry Osier

Henry
The Dealers at CC 21 were some of the nicest people I have encountered
in my convention career. I can honestly say that no dealer had any problem
with how the dealers area was set up. The truth be known many of the dealers
were happy to have AlterYears in attendances. Most of the if not all of the
dealers showed a profit from the convention.I believe if convention
organizers would consider what’s good for the attendees and treat the dealers
they have in attendance as the valuable commodity that they are than they
will have as good a convention as we had. The only feedback that I received
from any of the dealers was positive, during and after the convention. So if
the people observing from the outside feel that the dealers room should have
allowed equality in the number of tables each dealer is allowed instead of
quality of vendors perhaps they should consider who the convention is being
done for the attendees or the poltically correct non-attendees.

Kyym

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 197 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room

The only thing I didn’t like about the CC-21 dealer’s room took place
before the con: the “juried” method of selecting dealers.

As a self-employed businessperson (as most dealers are), money is always
tight. There was NO WAY I was going to pay for dealer space in advance and
then wait *months* for the committee to decide if I actually could vend at
the con or not.

Anybody else have thoughts on a “juried” vs. “first come, first served”
approach?

–Karen

At 11:33 AM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Hello!
> I got this response from Kyym Kimple, the guy who ran our Dealers’
>Room at CC21.
> Henry Osier

 

Group: runacc Message: 198 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers Room

At 07:16 AM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

> And speaking of variety, FABRIC! We hardly ever see it in dealers
> rooms. If you can get a fabric dealer in, that would be a good
> thing! (Assuming the dealer has decent stuff.)

CC-3 had two fabric dealers, and I bought from both of them.

CCXV had Timeless Textiles (also somebody with vintage “ethnic” textiles)
and I think they did a boffo business.

Obviously, fabric can take up a LOT of space in a very short time, and
local fabric stores may not be keen on packing up their inventory to schlep
to a con. But fabric always does well.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 199 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served
The reason that we went with the juried approach was to eliminate dealers
with the table full of action figures and ones with stuff that wasn’t
costuming orientated. We felt that this was fair to the dealers, who want to
make money, and the attendees.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 200 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/20/2003
Subject: Re: Dealers’ Room: Juried vs First-Come, First Served

At 11:50 AM 5/20/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>The reason that we went with the juried approach was to eliminate dealers
>with the table full of action figures and ones with stuff that wasn’t
>costuming orientated.

I don’t think any Costume-Con has ever had non-costuming oriented dealers
apply for space.

Anyone?

–Karen

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 3 of 67

Messages in runacc group. Page 3 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 101 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 102 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 103 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 104 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 105 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 106 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 107 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 108 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 109 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 110 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 111 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Group: runacc Message: 112 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 113 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 114 From: Sharon Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Volunteers (was Various Points)
Group: runacc Message: 115 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 116 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 117 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 118 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 119 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)
Group: runacc Message: 120 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 121 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 122 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 123 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers
Group: runacc Message: 124 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 125 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)
Group: runacc Message: 126 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points
Group: runacc Message: 127 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)
Group: runacc Message: 128 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 129 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 130 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)
Group: runacc Message: 131 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)
Group: runacc Message: 132 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)
Group: runacc Message: 133 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 134 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 135 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 136 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 137 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Handling explanations of what’s going on/welcoming newbies
Group: runacc Message: 138 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 139 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 140 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
Group: runacc Message: 141 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: CC23
Group: runacc Message: 142 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Hotel staff (and a electrical power story) was Restaurants, Val
Group: runacc Message: 143 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Hotel staff
Group: runacc Message: 144 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 145 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 146 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Group: runacc Message: 147 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23
Group: runacc Message: 148 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Quick adjustment in lighting, was Restaurants, Valentines
Group: runacc Message: 149 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23
Group: runacc Message: 150 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 101 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

CC 9 was February 15-18, 1991, according to the Costume-ConNections web site..

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Martin Gear
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Date ideas

Betsy Delaney wrote:
>
<snip>
> For example, here in Columbia, where two of the CCs were held (CC3 and
> CC9), we had Memorial Day and President’s Day weekends respectively. As
> I recall, the former was a major problem for our area because there’s an
> annual soccer tournament, and all the hotels are booked well in advance
> to accommodate all the out of town teams. (I’m certain Marty will
> correct me if I’m wrong, here.) I think that’s the main reason we chose
> to do CC9 in February. No soccer teams to worry about.

Sorry Betsy, but according to my records, we’ve held all three Baltimore
area CC’s over Memorial Day weekend. That was Disclave’s weekend, and
since Disclave did not generally do a masquerade, we offered a special
rate to Disclave members who wanted to come to Costume Con just for the
masquerades.

The soccer tournament was not a major problem for CC-3 although as Kathy
Sanders put it, “We were expecting (bass voice) SOCCER PLAYERS and we
got (falsetto voice) soccer players.” During that weekend the Hilton
was the headquarters hotel for the tournament and most of the teams
stayed with families in the area. By CC-9, the tournament has expanded
and we had a lot more soccer families staying at the Columbia Inn. Also
it became obvious that the Columbia Inn really did not have sufficient
function space for the size that Costume Con had become. We held CC-15
in downtown Baltimore over Memorial Day weekend because all of the
suburban hotels were now booked solid because of soccer tournaments in
the area. Given that, and the fact that BaltiCon [very costumer friendly
for those of you who never been] is now on Memorial Day weekend, I would
doubt that we will see any East Coast CC’s using that weekend.

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 102 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21
I said I’d post the org table from our bid plans. This is what we have
so far, with some names filled in (trimmed from my working web-page
document).

The Executive Committee
Chairman: Kevin Roche
Vice-Chairman: Karen Tully
Treasurer: Lisa Deutsch Harrigan
Secretary:

Administration
The business functions of the conference… making sure we have a place
to hold it, figuring out what needs to be done, seeing that there are
people to get things done, ensuring that you can register and attend.
Facilities:
Operations: Sarah Goodman
Registration:
Volunteering:
Program & Events Scheduler: Yvette Keller
CC29 Site Selection:
Accountant: Allison Reddington

Communications
If a conference happened in the woods, and there was nobody to attend
it, would it really happen? Of course not. Our communications group is
here to make sure you’re not in the dark about what’s happening before
and at the convention.
Communications Manager: Lance Moore
Publications:
Bid Chair: Andy Trembley
Bid Committee
Nancy Mildebrandt & Glen Boettcher
Henry Osier
Sandra & Jim Manning
Sandra Childress & Jim Briggs
Byron & Tina Connell
Jan Price
Elaine & Carl Mami

Hospitality
Providing the best welcome we can…
Friday Night Social:
Con Suite: Sandra Childress
Fairy Godfather:

Contests
Future Fashion Folio:
Doll Contest: Carolyn Kayta Barrows

Events
Fantasy & Science Fiction Masquerade:
Historical Masquerade:
Future Fashion Show:
Single Pattern Competition: (Part of Future Fashion Show)

Event Support
House Manager:
Stage Manager: John O’Halloran
Green Room Manager:
Tech Manager: Carl “Z!” Zwanzig
Tech Crew
Official Photography:
Official Video:
Lights:
Sound:

Fixed Exhibits
Exhibits Coordinator: Sally Norton
Dealers’ Room Coordinator:

Programming
Panel Discussions and workshops don’t just happen.
Program Developer: Hilary Ayer


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 103 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21

Betsy, the only thing I can add to your list at this time is, for the
“during” section, availability of water!

Elaine

>

 

Group: runacc Message: 104 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 05:40 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:

> Betsy, the only thing I can add to your list at this time is, for the
> “during” section, availability of water!

Well, the original idea was that the Bid/Before/During/After is a grid
showing responsibilities of each department and when they come due, so
water is:

Hotel/Before making sure water service is detailed out in the contract
Hotel/During making sure the hotel is living up to the contract

Consuite/Before including water in the shopping list and is purchased
Consuite/During ensuring that water remains cold and stocked.

I’d actually place water as a detail item in the general
responsibilities list for both Hotel and Consuite instead of in the
Bid/Before/During/After grid. It’s the kind of thing the WSFS
“Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee” takes care of at WorldCon. The
grid is more of a high-level planning calendar indicating when major
deadlines and responsibilities fall due.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 105 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates

Rather than an abstract idea of “reasonable,” you need to compare the shuttle rate against the alternatives, such as (1) the cost of renting a car at the airport/train station/bus station and driving to the hotel (and back), (2) the cab fare from the airport/etc. to the hotel, and (3) public transportation, if available. My original comment was that I found $20.00 better that the alleged $50.00 on the cab meter.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Charles Galway
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Shuttle rates

We had been getting prices quoted of about $26 one-way, with additional reductions for multiple passengers. While annoying, I considered this to be acceptable, IF the hotel, food, membership, air-fares were all at a reasonable rate. (Which we’re trying to do.) We plan to post current rates later, closer to one year out. (and maybe work out a group rate.)
Charles CC-23

—–Original Message—–
From: Byron Connell <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
<snip>
I have been happy to pay a flat $20 for a cab from O’Hare to an off-airport hotel in the Chicago area, compared to the about $50 I understand would be run up on the meter.

Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 106 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Byron & Betsy –
I stand corrected. Sorry about that.

Marty

Byron Connell wrote:

>
> CC 9 was February 15-18, 1991, according to the Costume-ConNections web site..
>
> Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 107 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 06:48 PM, Byron Connell wrote:

> Rather than an abstract idea of “reasonable,” you need to compare the
> shuttle rate against the alternatives, such as (1) the cost of renting
> a car at the airport/train station/bus station and driving to the
> hotel (and back), (2) the cab fare from the airport/etc. to the hotel,
> and (3) public transportation, if available. My original comment was
> that I found $20.00 better that the alleged $50.00 on the cab meter.

Exactly what I was trying to get to (but got distracted) in my earlier
note. There will be some sort of expense in getting to the con whether
you fly or drive.

This is not a cost the con can necessarily control, or should even have
responsibility for. If it’s not a controllable cost, agonizing over it
is pointless. Best to just list out alternatives.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 108 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21

That’s what I get for flying instead of attending the meeting. I was just
thinking of “in the halls, in the function rooms” instead of “planning for
and assuring placement of.”

Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!

> On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 05:40 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:
> > Betsy, the only thing I can add to your list at this time is, for the
> > “during” section, availability of water!
>
> Well, the original idea was that the Bid/Before/During/After is a grid
> showing responsibilities of each department and when they come due, so
> water is:
>
> Hotel/Before making sure water service is detailed out in the contract
> Hotel/During making sure the hotel is living up to the contract
>
> Consuite/Before including water in the shopping list and is purchased
> Consuite/During ensuring that water remains cold and stocked.
>
> I’d actually place water as a detail item in the general
> responsibilities list for both Hotel and Consuite instead of in the
> Bid/Before/During/After grid. It’s the kind of thing the WSFS
> “Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee” takes care of at WorldCon. The
> grid is more of a high-level planning calendar indicating when major
> deadlines and responsibilities fall due.
>
> —
> Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
> The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
> http://www.bovil.com/
> Moo!
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 109 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21

Actually, “water” is a fairly major item DURING the con for the members; therefore, it is an important item for inclusion in the guide. This is true not only in terms of set-ups for program items but more importantly in the masquerade green rooms, where it is a health and safety item. It may have to be specified in the hotel contract.

I do not know whether CC 21 had water set-ups for the green rooms. The absence of such set-ups for program items was very obvious, which suggests to me that it was not specified in the hotel contract.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Outline from the White Board at CC21

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 05:40 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:
> Betsy, the only thing I can add to your list at this time is, for the
> “during” section, availability of water!

Well, the original idea was that the Bid/Before/During/After is a grid
showing responsibilities of each department and when they come due, so
water is:

Hotel/Before making sure water service is detailed out in the contract
Hotel/During making sure the hotel is living up to the contract

Consuite/Before including water in the shopping list and is purchased
Consuite/During ensuring that water remains cold and stocked.

I’d actually place water as a detail item in the general
responsibilities list for both Hotel and Consuite instead of in the
Bid/Before/During/After grid. It’s the kind of thing the WSFS
“Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee” takes care of at WorldCon. The
grid is more of a high-level planning calendar indicating when major
deadlines and responsibilities fall due.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 110 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates

It may to some extent be a controllable cost, if the concom can negotiate the fee with the service provider. In that case, the concom needs to have some accurate benchmarks to use in determining whether or not this is a service worth contracting for.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Shuttle rates

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 06:48 PM, Byron Connell wrote:
> Rather than an abstract idea of “reasonable,” you need to compare the
> shuttle rate against the alternatives, such as (1) the cost of renting
> a car at the airport/train station/bus station and driving to the
> hotel (and back), (2) the cab fare from the airport/etc. to the hotel,
> and (3) public transportation, if available. My original comment was
> that I found $20.00 better that the alleged $50.00 on the cab meter.

Exactly what I was trying to get to (but got distracted) in my earlier
note. There will be some sort of expense in getting to the con whether
you fly or drive.

This is not a cost the con can necessarily control, or should even have
responsibility for. If it’s not a controllable cost, agonizing over it
is pointless. Best to just list out alternatives.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 111 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Outline from the White Board at CC21

Byron –

There were water set-ups in the greenroom, but there was a dearth of
glasses, so after the masquerade when I really needed a drink of water,
there were no clean glasses to be had. I’m not sure they expected as many
folks in the greenrooms as they had.

Trudy

>From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Outline from the White Board at CC21
>Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 23:51:18 -0400
>
>Actually, “water” is a fairly major item DURING the con for the members;
>therefore, it is an important item for inclusion in the guide. This is
>true not only in terms of set-ups for program items but more importantly in
>the masquerade green rooms, where it is a health and safety item. It may
>have to be specified in the hotel contract.
>
>I do not know whether CC 21 had water set-ups for the green rooms. The
>absence of such set-ups for program items was very obvious, which suggests
>to me that it was not specified in the hotel contract.
>
>Byron
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Andrew Trembley
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 9:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Outline from the White Board at CC21
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 05:40 PM, Elaine Mami wrote:
> > Betsy, the only thing I can add to your list at this time is, for the
> > “during” section, availability of water!
>
> Well, the original idea was that the Bid/Before/During/After is a grid
> showing responsibilities of each department and when they come due, so
> water is:
>
> Hotel/Before making sure water service is detailed out in the contract
> Hotel/During making sure the hotel is living up to the contract
>
> Consuite/Before including water in the shopping list and is purchased
> Consuite/During ensuring that water remains cold and stocked.
>
> I’d actually place water as a detail item in the general
> responsibilities list for both Hotel and Consuite instead of in the
> Bid/Before/During/After grid. It’s the kind of thing the WSFS
> “Nitpicking & Flyspecking Committee” takes care of at WorldCon. The
> grid is more of a high-level planning calendar indicating when major
> deadlines and responsibilities fall due.
>
> —
> Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
> The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
> http://www.bovil.com/
> Moo!
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

 

Group: runacc Message: 112 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Various Points
The following are my replies/comments to various issues brought up on this
list over the last couple of days. My apologies for not quoting the
sources, but I am already losing track.

Volunteers

I was one of the people who found volunteering at CC21 very difficult. In
this case, the volunteer co-ordinators had assumed that the MD’s for each
show had already put their entire staff together and the co-ordinators were
therefore only looking for general gophers. I am guessing this assumption
was based on local traditions. I think it also put a strain on the
masquerade staff who were expecting the traditional walk-in volunteers to
make up their numbers. This would be a communication issue because it looks
like both sides made assumptions based on prior experience.

Volunteering is a difficult challenge for all conventions. At CC’s it is
especially difficult to get walk-in volunteers for non-masquerade related
jobs, because the masquerade is what our members are used to being
volunteers for at all other conventions. Therefore it helps to have some
labour-intensive departments (such as registration and security) work at
pre-recruiting staff. This would also help get the instructions to the
volunteers before they start doing their jobs.

Date

We, (CC19) chose the Memorial day weekend (which is not a holiday in Canada)
specifically because of weather considerations. We were trying to market
Calgary and the surrounding area as an interesting place to visit, and
Calgary in February looks a lot less attractive than May. (Well, maybe not
May this year.) Locally, there was no problem with the non-holiday, but we
did run into conflict problems with some of the U.S. conventions the same
weekend.

CC18 in Hartford was in a great downtown location, but because it was a
holiday weekend, everything was closed.

Hotel

I would suggest that future committees provide specific room layouts to the
hotel well before the con. We established what risers were available back
when we first signed our hotel contract. Layouts for every room for every
hour of the convention had to be initialed both by myself and a hotel
representative a week before the convention. This included maps we provided
to the hotel of the expected layout for both the stage and the Dealers’
room.

We also specified water in the rooms, although there was no issue over this.
I would recommend including it though. It is one of those little things
that is far more noticeable in its absence than its presence.

For those upcoming cons on this list that have not yet signed a hotel
contract, the clause that saved us the most was the one we had removed. The
hotel originally included a clause that would have required us to pay for
the rooms in our block booking that were not filled. This is the issue we
chose to fight over and the clause was removed from the contract we signed.
(Two years later the hotel was bought by a new chain who wanted us to sign a
new contract, siting the extra room charges we would be liable for as the
reason we should renegotiate. By being able to stick to our original
contract, we saved a lot of the additional costs the new contract would have
forced on us.)

Dining guide

This is an excellent suggestion about a small but incredibly useful detail.
In most cases attendees are in a completely unknown location, and many have
no access to vehicles. A restaurant guide covering what is available nearby
is so useful. (Henry provided something like one on the internet before
CC21, but I don’t remember seeing one available at con.)

Site selection

I strongly agree with this one. I wish I had argued more for some sort of
receipt. Since U.S.$ cheques are not an option for me, I voted with cash
and have nothing to prove it.

From the point of view of the CC receiving the money, multiple layered
receipts are incredibly useful. First, there are two written records of the
names of the people that have voted, the ballot and the receipt. Many
people can be very sloppy even printing their own name. Second, you have
the peace of mind knowing that if someone comes up to you and waves a
receipt saying that you have a financial obligation to them, you have an
exact copy of the same receipt in your records. The accountant in me always
wants the future auditor of my records to be able to follow a reasonable
audit trail. (An audit is required of all Alberta non-profit organizations
to keep that status, although it is not required that the auditor be a
professional or be paid a fee. Is this also a requirement of U.S.
non-profit status groups?)

Eileen Capes

 

Group: runacc Message: 113 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

Eileen–

Thanks for your insights.

At 12:13 AM 5/7/2003 -0600, you wrote:

>This would be a communication issue because it looks
>like both sides made assumptions based on prior experience.

CC-21 had communication issues overall, so this does not surprise me in the
least.

>Therefore it helps to have some
>labour-intensive departments (such as registration and security) work at
>pre-recruiting staff. This would also help get the instructions to the
>volunteers before they start doing their jobs.

I don’t think I’ve ever had volunteers working Reg, unless they were locals
and I knew them well.

Pre-recruitment in these departments is an *excellent* idea.

>Locally, there was no problem with the non-holiday, but we
>did run into conflict problems with some of the U.S. conventions the same
>weekend.

Again, we’re bound to conflict with something somewhere because there are
so many other events out there, especially because Costume-Con has the
Historical component (so there are more events to conflict with than just
S/F conventions).

>CC18 in Hartford was in a great downtown location, but because it was a
>holiday weekend, everything was closed.

Ditto other Costume-Cons. DItto other S/F cons. I was grateful that many
restaurants were open around the CC-21 hotel for at east part of the day on
Easter Sunday.

>Hotel

Very good suggestions here.

>Dining guide

I know many larger S/F cons (particularly WorldCon) supply this to their
members, and it *is* a very handy item.

>(Henry provided something like one on the internet before
>CC21, but I don’t remember seeing one available at con.)

Again, we can’t rely 100% on the Internet to supply information to members.

>Site selection
>
>I strongly agree with this one. I wish I had argued more for some sort of
>receipt. Since U.S.$ cheques are not an option for me, I voted with cash
>and have nothing to prove it.

Yikes. I hope this does not cause you problems down the road.

Betsy, is there language in the Site Selection process that specifies
giving receipts? If not, it is an oversight and needs to be be there.

When voting for Site Selection at many a WesterCon and WorldCon, there was
either a separate receipt, or a portion of the ballot that was removable
and became a receipt.

> From the point of view of the CC receiving the money, multiple layered
>receipts are incredibly useful.

And a simple receipt book that makes carbon copies (available at any office
supply store) would suffice for this job–no need to print fancy NCR forms.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 114 From: Sharon Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Volunteers (was Various Points)
You’re right – there are some areas at a CC where the volunteers just
aren’t there so it will be CC staff, which may be needed elsewhere
depending on what else is going on.

Is it a possibility that this could be factored in, and some reward
(much like SF cons) be given to CC volunteers who volunteer for the
less glamorous work? Might have to strike a deal with other staff
members, like MDs, but this might get a larger pool of volunteers.

Although it’s sometimes nice to find the Con Chair working con reg,
it shouldn’t be something we expect to see for two solid days every
CC. I noticed this at a couple of earlier CCs.

Sharon

 

Group: runacc Message: 115 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

Cliff and Eileen wrote:

>

<snip>>

> Volunteers
>
> I was one of the people who found volunteering at CC21 very difficult.

Bobby was going crazy in the Green Room for the F&SF Masquerade because
she couldn’t get Den Moms. There should be a volunteer sign-up sheet at
Registration possibly with jobs/events listed.

> Hotel
>
> I would suggest that future committees provide specific room layouts to the
> hotel well before the con. We established what risers were available back
> when we first signed our hotel contract. Layouts for every room for every
> hour of the convention had to be initialed both by myself and a hotel
> representative a week before the convention. This included maps we provided
> to the hotel of the expected layout for both the stage and the Dealers’
> room.

This is a MUST DO or you have no recourse if the hotel doesn’t provide
what was promised.

>
> For those upcoming cons on this list that have not yet signed a hotel
> contract, the clause that saved us the most was the one we had removed. The
> hotel originally included a clause that would have required us to pay for
> the rooms in our block booking that were not filled. This is the issue we
> chose to fight over and the clause was removed from the contract we signed.
> (Two years later the hotel was bought by a new chain who wanted us to sign a
> new contract, siting the extra room charges we would be liable for as the
> reason we should renegotiate. By being able to stick to our original
> contract, we saved a lot of the additional costs the new contract would have
> forced on us.)

Except for a few flagship hotels, it seems that major city hotels change
ownership on the average of once every 5 years. It is for this reason
that the hotel contract must be almost anally detailed. When the hotel
is sold, your contract is one of the assets that the new owners
purchased, but frequently they don’t look at it this way and try to find
ways to squeeze extra money from the group and make it more profitable
by cutting back on the services promised. Once the hotel contract is
signed, the hotel liaison’s job just begins. He/She should contact the
hotel’s SMERF (Social, Military, Educational, Religious, Fraternal)
group person on a regular basis, at least quarterly during the years
leading up to the con and monthly for the 12 months immediately prior to
the con to make certain that nothing has changed e.g. that the hotel
hasn’t decided to do major renovations the week of the con, and that the
key people are still in place.

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 116 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

Toni Lay just posted this to the ICG-D list, and I thought it was worthy of
our attention.

There were an awful lot of newbies wandering around Thursday and Friday
night of CC-21, looking lost.

–Karen

>To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
>
>At 12:36 PM 5/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>I think the Friday Night Social is the best time to pull newcomers into the
>>fold. Thought they may have been to SF or Anime cons, which have certain
>>”procedures” they’re familiar with, Costume Con may be totally uncertain to
>>them. I think a nice gesture would be to have a table, prominently situated
>>at the party with a sign and two or three CC veterans seated there, and
>>newcomers could come over and chat, find out things, get a feel for the con.
>>
>>I remember my first Friday Night Social at my first CC. It was CC 3. I got
>>all dressed up in a caftan I made and was rather proud of it. I actually
>>got the print matched up. I got to the door of the function room and
>>stopped. The costumes some people were wearing was gorgeous. I was so
>>embarrased at my simple caftan, I immediately turned around, went back to my
>>room and changed back into my jeans and t-shirt, and went back to the party.
>>I’d never seen costumes of that quality at any of the SF and Trek cons I’d
>>previously attended. Obviously, CCs operated on a higher plane.
>>
>>Toni
>>
>>—–Original Message—–
>>From: MicheleSol@aol.com [mailto:MicheleSol@aol.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 11:20 PM
>>To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Digest Number 1080 sorry forgot question
>>
>>
>>After speaking with someone, I thought I’d ask, is there anything we can do
>>to help people new to CC’s to feel more included. So it’s not so
>>intimidating to be surrounded by “Costumers”. Maybe something for them in
>>terms of a panel etc? Get to know kind of thing?
>>
>>
>>Michele
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>ICG-D-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>ICG-D-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 117 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 11:13 PM, Cliff and Eileen wrote:

> Volunteers
>
> I was one of the people who found volunteering at CC21 very difficult.
> In
> this case, the volunteer co-ordinators had assumed that the MD’s for
> each
> show had already put their entire staff together and the co-ordinators
> were
> therefore only looking for general gophers. I am guessing this
> assumption
> was based on local traditions. I think it also put a strain on the
> masquerade staff who were expecting the traditional walk-in volunteers
> to
> make up their numbers. This would be a communication issue because it
> looks
> like both sides made assumptions based on prior experience.

This is probably an accurate assessment.

> Volunteering is a difficult challenge for all conventions. At CC’s it
> is
> especially difficult to get walk-in volunteers for non-masquerade
> related
> jobs, because the masquerade is what our members are used to being
> volunteers for at all other conventions. Therefore it helps to have
> some
> labour-intensive departments (such as registration and security) work
> at
> pre-recruiting staff. This would also help get the instructions to the
> volunteers before they start doing their jobs.

I’m going to agree with pre-recruitment for non-masquerade related
jobs. Of course, I’m going to encourage people to pre-recruit for all
jobs if possible. Having worked Folsom Fringe, we’re kind of blessed
with the culture of volunteering that is such a big part of con fandom.
For Fringe, we had to pre-recruit all volunteers and offer major
incentives just to get them to sign up, because we knew we couldn’t
depend on at-conference volunteers for much of anything.

As an answer to both issues, I’m going to suggest that masquerade
registration and the volunteer desk be placed near each other. This
would help in the following ways:
1. Masquerade staffing is the largest portion of volunteer use. Having
the Masq directors and the Volunteer Coordinator near each other can
make it much easier on the Masquerade director, both in checking in
volunteers and adding jobs to the list that need to be filled. I know
that checking in volunteers was less of a priority for me at the Masq
desk than checking in entrants.
2. Henry made the point at the Build-a-CC panel that a master personnel
scheduler would have been really valuable to determine who is on duty
when. It’s also important in determining when people are available for
jobs in the first place. And finally, it’s important if the con should
choose to reward volunteers for their hours served.

Related to that, Masquerade registration desk is busy, and it need not
be near con registration. The two together can really cause a traffic
jam. This wasn’t a problem for me at CC21, but it might have been for
reg.

> Site selection
>
> I strongly agree with this one. I wish I had argued more for some
> sort of
> receipt. Since U.S.$ cheques are not an option for me, I voted with
> cash
> and have nothing to prove it.

I like the WorldCon ballot format, and would heartily recommend it. As
I remember, this is how it works:

Each ballot is three pieces (one page folded in thirds). Each piece has
a control number on it. The top piece has the voter’s contact
information. The middle piece has the ballot itself. The third piece is
the voter’s receipt.

At the first station, the cashier validates and pulls the top (contact)
portion, takes the cash, and initials the receipt. At the second
station, the poll worker validates the ballot, initials the receipt,
separates the portions and places the ballot in the ballot box. The
final portion is returned to the voter.

The ballots are counted, and I believe retained by the site selection
commissioner. The vote is validated and the contact forms and funds are
given to the winning committee. The winning committee never receives
the actual ballots, so they don’t know who voted for, against, or no
preference.

The voter can, at any point, confirm with either the site selection
commissioner or with the concom that they voted because both have
records that have the same control number as their receipt.

Control numbers can be pre-printed on the sheets, or (in the case of
CC, where it’s a small vote) written in or stamped on by the cashier.

If you would like the official way of handling this, I know the Site
Selection Commissioner from ConJose and ConAgerie (Westercon). I’m sure
he can fill in the information that’s not in the WSFS Constitution or
the LASFS Constitution.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.bovil.com/
“It’s not pink; it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.” –Manfred Pfirsich
Marie Rommel

 

Group: runacc Message: 118 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
At CC21, I know that it was one of the things that was in our contract. They
told us that they had discontinued the airport shuttle service, but they did
that after it was in our contract.

Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 119 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)

In a message dated 5/7/2003 10:21:43 AM Central Daylight Time,
s_trembley@yahoo.com writes:

> Although it’s sometimes nice to find the Con Chair working con reg,
> it shouldn’t be something we expect to see for two solid days every
> CC.

Sharon,
I also did Pre-Reg, so logically, I should have done Reg at the Con.
I was too busy running around keeping an eye on everything.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 120 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

Karen —

At this point, I suggest that we include these ideas in the “CC Runners’ Guide” before you add any of them to the ConStitution. Let’s see which ones are appropriate for guidance and which ones have to be requirements. The danger is that you might make the ConStitution unwieldy.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Various Points

Eileen–

Thanks for your insights.

At 12:13 AM 5/7/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>This would be a communication issue because it looks
>like both sides made assumptions based on prior experience.

CC-21 had communication issues overall, so this does not surprise me in the
least.

>Therefore it helps to have some
>labour-intensive departments (such as registration and security) work at
>pre-recruiting staff. This would also help get the instructions to the
>volunteers before they start doing their jobs.

I don’t think I’ve ever had volunteers working Reg, unless they were locals
and I knew them well.

Pre-recruitment in these departments is an *excellent* idea.

>Locally, there was no problem with the non-holiday, but we
>did run into conflict problems with some of the U.S. conventions the same
>weekend.

Again, we’re bound to conflict with something somewhere because there are
so many other events out there, especially because Costume-Con has the
Historical component (so there are more events to conflict with than just
S/F conventions).

>CC18 in Hartford was in a great downtown location, but because it was a
>holiday weekend, everything was closed.

Ditto other Costume-Cons. DItto other S/F cons. I was grateful that many
restaurants were open around the CC-21 hotel for at east part of the day on
Easter Sunday.

>Hotel

Very good suggestions here.

>Dining guide

I know many larger S/F cons (particularly WorldCon) supply this to their
members, and it *is* a very handy item.

>(Henry provided something like one on the internet before
>CC21, but I don’t remember seeing one available at con.)

Again, we can’t rely 100% on the Internet to supply information to members.

>Site selection
>
>I strongly agree with this one. I wish I had argued more for some sort of
>receipt. Since U.S.$ cheques are not an option for me, I voted with cash
>and have nothing to prove it.

Yikes. I hope this does not cause you problems down the road.

Betsy, is there language in the Site Selection process that specifies
giving receipts? If not, it is an oversight and needs to be be there.

When voting for Site Selection at many a WesterCon and WorldCon, there was
either a separate receipt, or a portion of the ballot that was removable
and became a receipt.

> From the point of view of the CC receiving the money, multiple layered
>receipts are incredibly useful.

And a simple receipt book that makes carbon copies (available at any office
supply store) would suffice for this job–no need to print fancy NCR forms.

–Karen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 121 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

Especially since the person in the SMERF position is likely to change a minimum of three times over the three years until the con.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Martin Gear
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Various Points

Once the hotel contract is
signed, the hotel liaison’s job just begins. He/She should contact the
hotel’s SMERF (Social, Military, Educational, Religious, Fraternal)
group person on a regular basis, at least quarterly during the years
leading up to the con and monthly for the 12 months immediately prior to
the con to make certain that nothing has changed e.g. that the hotel
hasn’t decided to do major renovations the week of the con, and that the
key people are still in place.

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 122 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

Tina and I were wandering around on Thursday, looking lost, until she left on the shopping tour. I still was wandering around, looking lost, after she was gone!

Aside from that, I agree that it is desirable for a CC to have people who will reach out to neos. Some other Costume-Cons have done that; some of it has been reported to have been successful.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: [runacc] Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

Toni Lay just posted this to the ICG-D list, and I thought it was worthy of
our attention.

There were an awful lot of newbies wandering around Thursday and Friday
night of CC-21, looking lost.

–Karen

>To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers
>
>At 12:36 PM 5/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>I think the Friday Night Social is the best time to pull newcomers into the
>>fold. Thought they may have been to SF or Anime cons, which have certain
>>”procedures” they’re familiar with, Costume Con may be totally uncertain to
>>them. I think a nice gesture would be to have a table, prominently situated
>>at the party with a sign and two or three CC veterans seated there, and
>>newcomers could come over and chat, find out things, get a feel for the con.
>>
>>I remember my first Friday Night Social at my first CC. It was CC 3. I got
>>all dressed up in a caftan I made and was rather proud of it. I actually
>>got the print matched up. I got to the door of the function room and
>>stopped. The costumes some people were wearing was gorgeous. I was so
>>embarrased at my simple caftan, I immediately turned around, went back to my
>>room and changed back into my jeans and t-shirt, and went back to the party.
>>I’d never seen costumes of that quality at any of the SF and Trek cons I’d
>>previously attended. Obviously, CCs operated on a higher plane.
>>
>>Toni
>>
>>—–Original Message—–
>>From: MicheleSol@aol.com [mailto:MicheleSol@aol.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 11:20 PM
>>To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [ICG-D] Digest Number 1080 sorry forgot question
>>
>>
>>After speaking with someone, I thought I’d ask, is there anything we can do
>>to help people new to CC’s to feel more included. So it’s not so
>>intimidating to be surrounded by “Costumers”. Maybe something for them in
>>terms of a panel etc? Get to know kind of thing?
>>
>>
>>Michele

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 123 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers

When I run a green room, I depend on members volunteering on-site. I don’t think I ever have had more than one pre-assigned green room volunteer. I post a volunteer sign-up sheet at masquerade registration (or con registration at a Costume-Con) and check it regularly (about every five minutes).

There is a Great Floating North American Masquerade Crew and I depend on it. Generally, they come through, not merely in numbers but in terms of volunteers who have worked green rooms several times before and are very familiar with several of the jobs. I don’t even have to brief some of them! As Janet Anderson pointed out years ago, master costumers who are not in the masquerade have an obligation to help run it. We’ve surprised many novices whose den moms were masters.

I would trust several of these people to take over the green room — or even all of back stage — at any con (although a few of them are in denial about their competence to do so) — the list has grown over the past several years, I’m delighted to say. I’m more than happy to provide references for them. This is one area where we have been fairly successful in recruiting new blood.

Sometimes the number of volunteers is sparse because so many costumers are in the masquerade. If necessary, the green room manager adapts to the number at hand, supplemented, if possible, by untrained gophers from the con’s general pool of volunteers. That may mean fewer and larger dens, for example, or doing without mother’s helpers, or doubling jobs up, but we can cope.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Various Points

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 11:13 PM, Cliff and Eileen wrote:
> Volunteers
>
> I was one of the people who found volunteering at CC21 very difficult.
> In
> this case, the volunteer co-ordinators had assumed that the MD’s for
> each
> show had already put their entire staff together and the co-ordinators
> were
> therefore only looking for general gophers. I am guessing this
> assumption
> was based on local traditions. I think it also put a strain on the
> masquerade staff who were expecting the traditional walk-in volunteers
> to
> make up their numbers. This would be a communication issue because it
> looks
> like both sides made assumptions based on prior experience.

This is probably an accurate assessment.

> Volunteering is a difficult challenge for all conventions. At CC’s it
> is
> especially difficult to get walk-in volunteers for non-masquerade
> related
> jobs, because the masquerade is what our members are used to being
> volunteers for at all other conventions. Therefore it helps to have
> some
> labour-intensive departments (such as registration and security) work
> at
> pre-recruiting staff. This would also help get the instructions to the
> volunteers before they start doing their jobs.

I’m going to agree with pre-recruitment for non-masquerade related
jobs. Of course, I’m going to encourage people to pre-recruit for all
jobs if possible. Having worked Folsom Fringe, we’re kind of blessed
with the culture of volunteering that is such a big part of con fandom.
For Fringe, we had to pre-recruit all volunteers and offer major
incentives just to get them to sign up, because we knew we couldn’t
depend on at-conference volunteers for much of anything.

As an answer to both issues, I’m going to suggest that masquerade
registration and the volunteer desk be placed near each other. This
would help in the following ways:
1. Masquerade staffing is the largest portion of volunteer use. Having
the Masq directors and the Volunteer Coordinator near each other can
make it much easier on the Masquerade director, both in checking in
volunteers and adding jobs to the list that need to be filled. I know
that checking in volunteers was less of a priority for me at the Masq
desk than checking in entrants.
2. Henry made the point at the Build-a-CC panel that a master personnel
scheduler would have been really valuable to determine who is on duty
when. It’s also important in determining when people are available for
jobs in the first place. And finally, it’s important if the con should
choose to reward volunteers for their hours served.

Related to that, Masquerade registration desk is busy, and it need not
be near con registration. The two together can really cause a traffic
jam. This wasn’t a problem for me at CC21, but it might have been for
reg.

andy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 124 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

I agree with this statement for everything except the codification of
providing receipts for the Site Selection process. It is an oversight,
and needs to be corrected.

If you want, I’ll look into the existing language and make suggestions
for changes after I’m done with the web site overhaul. (I spent the
whole evening moving books and videos, and ripping up more carpet.)

Yuck.

Betsy

Byron Connell wrote:

>
> Karen —
>
> At this point, I suggest that we include these ideas in the “CC Runners’ Guide” before you add any of them to the ConStitution. Let’s see which ones are appropriate for guidance and which ones have to be requirements. The danger is that you might make the ConStitution unwieldy.
>
> Byron


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 125 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)
Henry —

No, you shouldn’t. There should have been someone — other than a co-chair — assigned to be in charge of registration. The co-chair should either (1) float and handle problems, as you did, or (2) stand around and look elegant.

This is part of the reason CC21 had too small a con-com, as I have mentioned already.

Byron

—- Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Volunteers (was Various Points)

I also did Pre-Reg, so logically, I should have done Reg at the Con.
I was too busy running around keeping an eye on everything.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 126 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Various Points

I want the receipts codified in the ConStitution. That’s the only thing
we’ve been discussing that I want there vs. in the Guide at the moment, as
giving receipts should be part of the process, and if it hasn’t been
spelled out, it should be.

–Karen

At 10:48 PM 5/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>I agree with this statement for everything except the codification of
>providing receipts for the Site Selection process. It is an oversight,
>and needs to be corrected.
>
>If you want, I’ll look into the existing language and make suggestions
>for changes after I’m done with the web site overhaul. (I spent the
>whole evening moving books and videos, and ripping up more carpet.)
>
>Yuck.
>
>Betsy
>
>Byron Connell wrote:
> >
> > Karen —
> >
> > At this point, I suggest that we include these ideas in the “CC
> Runners’ Guide” before you add any of them to the ConStitution. Let’s
> see which ones are appropriate for guidance and which ones have to be
> requirements. The danger is that you might make the ConStitution unwieldy.
> >
> > Byron
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 127 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/7/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (was Various Points)

First Rule of being Con Chair: Delegate, delegate, delegate!

Of course, you have to *have* Division Heads to delegate to…

Too few people wearing too many hats doth not a happy concom make.

–Karen

At 11:18 PM 5/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Henry —
>
>No, you shouldn’t. There should have been someone — other than a
>co-chair — assigned to be in charge of registration. The co-chair should
>either (1) float and handle problems, as you did, or (2) stand around and
>look elegant.
>
>This is part of the reason CC21 had too small a con-com, as I have
>mentioned already.
>
>Byron
>
>
>
>—- Original Message —–
> From: henryosier@cs.com
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 4:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Volunteers (was Various Points)
>
>
> I also did Pre-Reg, so logically, I should have done Reg at the Con.
> I was too busy running around keeping an eye on everything.
> Henry Osier
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Group: runacc Message: 128 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Every CC but one that was in February had weather/travel issues for us, and
it didn’t matter if we drove or flew. CC 6 and 8 we drove – had to detour
for snow both times. CC 9, 11, 12 our flights were messed up by weather
somewhere. CC18 we didn’t have weather issues, but there were food issues
(hotel restaurant not available because of Valentine’s day, nothing else
w/n walking distance but one Chinese place, which was also closed for
Chinese New Year).

P & S

>I clearly
>remember the President’s Day weekend snows messing up several cons due to
>travel conditions.
>
>Elaine

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 129 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Wrong year – not CC 18, but CC 17 (Philly/NJ).

P & S

At 10:53 PM 5/6/2003, you wrote:

>Every CC but one that was in February had weather/travel issues for us, and
>it didn’t matter if we drove or flew. CC 6 and 8 we drove – had to detour
>for snow both times. CC 9, 11, 12 our flights were messed up by weather
>somewhere. CC18 we didn’t have weather issues, but there were food issues
>(hotel restaurant not available because of Valentine’s day, nothing else
>w/n walking distance but one Chinese place, which was also closed for
>Chinese New Year).
>
>P & S

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 130 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)

For CC10, I think our con-com was 6 people, two of which were us. We did
hotel liaison, publications (because we were the only ones with a
computer), quartermaster, con chairs, etc., etc.

What saved our behinds at con reg was the Lincoln Convention and Visitors
Bureau. They provided the badges and badge holders at no charge, and 2-3
volunteers to run the registration desk every day of the con. Mostly they
were retired ladies and they had (AFAWK) a good time. We let them attend
whatever evening events they wanted as a reward. CVB also provided coupons,
maps, etc. I think this is a sometimes unexplored resource.

P & S

> > Although it’s sometimes nice to find the Con Chair working con reg,
> > it shouldn’t be something we expect to see for two solid days every
> > CC.
>Sharon,
> I also did Pre-Reg, so logically, I should have done Reg at the
> Con.
>I was too busy running around keeping an eye on everything.
>Henry Osier

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 131 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)

Another largely unexploited resource is the mundane or non-costuming
fannish friends of the concom. Most of ’em would be happy to work a shift
at the Registration table in exchange for free admission to the
masquerades, etc. in the evening.

I don’t think CC is large enough to absorb crash space for volunteers
(although the San Diego Comic-Con did when it was at the 500-1,000 person
size), but maybe there are other “perks” we can offer–special
volunteer-only t-shirts or other goodies.

–Karen

At 01:03 AM 5/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>What saved our behinds at con reg was the Lincoln Convention and Visitors
>Bureau. They provided the badges and badge holders at no charge, and 2-3
>volunteers to run the registration desk every day of the con. Mostly they
>were retired ladies and they had (AFAWK) a good time. We let them attend
>whatever evening events they wanted as a reward. CVB also provided coupons,
>maps, etc. I think this is a sometimes unexplored resource.
>
>P & S

 

Group: runacc Message: 132 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Volunteers (registration specifically)

We did just this at CCXV. My friend Laurie was willing to work the
registration table, which was good because our pre-con registrar wanted
to be able to go play. So, when they arrived at the con, they brought
pre-printed badge stock, blank stock for at-con registrants, printed
lists of members and what everyone had paid, and Laurie took over at
that point. I have faith in her ability to manage money. She’s currently
my company bookkeeper (as well as a very good friend). We took in over
$3000 in cash that weekend, so having someone reliable was very
important.

We only had one incident where money did not appear to be collected, in
all the at-door collection, and that appeared to be a treasurer problem.
Laurie was just fine with not going to panels since her only interest
was in the masquerades.

We did a very heavy recruiting job for volunteers and offered pubs to
people who worked more than a certain number of hours for the whole
weekend. Our security detail was offered crash space inside the dealer
room area. The upper floor, where displays and meeting rooms were
located, was locked off at night at the elevator.

The main thing is, if you’re going to recruit from outside the
community, you have to be willing to provide some gimmes, and some are
cheaper than others.

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Another largely unexploited resource is the mundane or non-costuming
> fannish friends of the concom. Most of ’em would be happy to work a shift
> at the Registration table in exchange for free admission to the
> masquerades, etc. in the evening.
>
> I don’t think CC is large enough to absorb crash space for volunteers
> (although the San Diego Comic-Con did when it was at the 500-1,000 person
> size), but maybe there are other “perks” we can offer–special
> volunteer-only t-shirts or other goodies.
>
> –Karen


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 133 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 08:53 PM, Pierre & Sandy Pettinger wrote:

> CC18 we didn’t have weather issues, but there were food issues
> (hotel restaurant not available because of Valentine’s day, nothing
> else
> w/n walking distance but one Chinese place, which was also closed for
> Chinese New Year).

I see you already caught yourself on the #.

Yeah, that was a hotel from hell from the members’ point of view. Not
only were there no restaurants within walking distance, but there were
also no sidewalks. I expect that for those of us working, the Skokie
Doubletree was worse, but what it did have was good and plentiful food
on-site and near off-site.

What was supposed to happen CC17 weekend was the basketball All-Star
game in Philadelphia. What happened instead was the basketball strike.
Hotel nights suddenly became available and the Philly area Chamber of
Commerce (I think, it might have been the CVB or some other group)
decided to market the crap out of hotels and hotel restaurants for
Valentines Day to make up for the loss.

Gets back to the restaurant service clause (and liquidated damages).
Either the hotel contract or the secondary agreement has to include
restaurant service requirements, and if the restaurant is operated
independently has to be signed by a representative of the restaurant.

Offsite food is a serious consideration, though.

One of the hotels we’re considering for CC26 is the San Jose
Doubletree. Great function space (two 9.000 sq.ft. ballrooms, one with
17′ ceilings), plentiful parking, and a great deal of con experience.
The downside is there are few off-site restaurants within walking
distance. The nearest are 3-5 blocks away, and that’s a Coco’s, a
Denny’s, a McDonald’s and the two restaurants at the SJ Hyatt (about 6
blocks away). On-site food isn’t spectacular, but both the quality and
service has been getting better over the last few years.

We’re also considering the Santa Clara Mariott (where CC12 was) because
it’s also got plentiful function space (11,000 sq.ft. California
Ballroom) and parking, and because it’s near Mission College and the
Mercado Mall (which means plentiful food). The classy on-site
restaurant is fabulous, and the sports-bar restaurant is decent. What
it doesn’t have is a nearly 20 year history of hosting conventions.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 134 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

> Tina and I were wandering around on Thursday, looking lost, until she left

on the shopping tour. I still was wandering around, looking lost, after she
was gone!

>
> Aside from that, I agree that it is desirable for a CC to have people who

will reach out to neos. Some other Costume-Cons have done that; some of it
has been reported to have been successful.

> Byron

There should be a welcoming or information point for <everyone> not just the
newbies. The location of whcih should be published in the last PR. I know
that a lot of people may spend their Thursday night sewing in their rooms
but having the registration packet or at least a pocket program at hand
let’s them plan ahead.

What neo-friendly ploys have people tried in the past? What worked?

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 135 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)
Andy, We have set our con in a no-history-of-fan-cons hotel. While it would help to have that history, it’s not essential. But it’s important that they at least get an idea of what’s coming up, and are accepting of that. (The still won’t REALLY know.)

I have also noticed a lot of cons here that I spend a year or two talking to sales mangagers, and then all I see on the week-end are banquet and set-up staff. And usually the have been told to be helpful. (even if they weren’t given wholly accurate directions for set-up.)

Setting up the masquerade in the hotel would require good cooperation with the hotel.
Usually you can tell how stuffy a hotel is after talking to them for awhile.

(Oh, but ask me again in two years, if what I’ve said needs to be modified.)
Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>

<snip> What it doesn’t have is a nearly 20 year history of hosting conventions.

andy

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 136 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

>What it doesn’t have is a nearly 20 year history of hosting conventions.

It was however, the hotel at which we held CC 12.

As I recall, the one really big facilities problem (I’m sure there were
assorted little ones) we had was that their electrical engineer/electrician
had a heart attack, and his backup was out of town and unreachable.

So there was a bunch of the concom along with the hotel management, staring
at the hookup panel where the ballroom electrical had to be connected for
the lights, sound etc, and there was *NO ONE* on the hotel staff qualified
and authorized to do so.

Suddenly the Goodrich Blimp floated down a nearby hallway, and when everyone
came back to the ballroom, the connections had magically appeared. (and of
course, since no one on the staff was authorized to touch the panel, no one
could disconnect them either).

So add “Making sure the hotel has backup staff plans for engineering” to our
to-do list for running a CC.

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 137 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Handling explanations of what’s going on/welcoming newbies

We lifted an idea from local LARPs and provided a “What’s Going On
Here?” sheet, cheerfully distributed throughout the hotel and at the
front desk. Anyone who happened on the paper could read about why people
in costume were wandering around at the hotel all weekend.

We also held a “What’s going on this weekend” panel each morning of the
three main days (Friday, Saturday and Sunday). We got the hotel early
enough Friday to start programming near to 10am, and did just that, but
I think the Friday panel occurred around mid afternoon. I could be wrong
– I’d have to look at the actual program (and the box is still
upstairs).

Finally, we designated several people as “ambassadors” who were told to
watch out for unfamiliar faces at various times and make conversation. I
know I did that a little this year on Friday night, but I was so
distracted waiting for Dan and Erin to arrive (which they did,
eventually, very late), I wasn’t much fun to talk to even with the
people I already know.

I think in general the outreach was well received. YMMV.

Cheers,

Betsy

Charles Galway wrote:

>
> Andy, We have set our con in a no-history-of-fan-cons hotel. While it would help to have that history, it’s not essential. But it’s important that they at least get an idea of what’s coming up, and are accepting of that. (The still won’t REALLY know.)
>
> I have also noticed a lot of cons here that I spend a year or two talking to sales mangagers, and then all I see on the week-end are banquet and set-up staff. And usually the have been told to be helpful. (even if they weren’t given wholly accurate directions for set-up.)
>
> Setting up the masquerade in the hotel would require good cooperation with the hotel.
> Usually you can tell how stuffy a hotel is after talking to them for awhile.
>
> (Oh, but ask me again in two years, if what I’ve said needs to be modified.)
> Charles


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 138 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 04:46 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> What neo-friendly ploys have people tried in the past? What worked?

well, there’s the one you guys tried at CC16 😉

Having the consuite open on Thursday night, and having that information
prominently posted was really nice. While I came with a major caravan
and knew a few other people, the vast majority of folks at the con I
hadn’t ever met before.

The extremely silly social theme was also very non-threatening.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen
http://www.irlm.org/ – mailto:webmaster@irlm.org
“Anybody who takes this seriously deserves to”
— Donna Barr

 

Group: runacc Message: 139 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 03:38 PM, Charles Galway wrote:

> Andy, We have set our con in a no-history-of-fan-cons hotel. While
> it would help to have that history, it’s not essential. But it’s
> important that they at least get an idea of what’s coming up, and are
> accepting of that. (The still won’t REALLY know.)

The thing is that we have a contender that does have a huge history of
hosting conventions, and that’s a big pro in it’s column.

> I have also noticed a lot of cons here that I spend a year or two
> talking to sales managers, and then all I see on the week-end are
> banquet and set-up staff. And usually the have been told to be
> helpful. (even if they weren’t given wholly accurate directions for
> set-up.)

Sales will often sell you the sky and leave both you and the hotel
operations people screwed when the time comes. This is why the WorldCon
runner’s guide suggests that you include in your hotel contract (or
secondary agreement) a clause that says your sales representative will
be staying onsite at the hotel during the convention.

It’s also worth it to request that banquet management is available
during at least some of the meetings you have with the hotel
(particularly when working out set-up details). It’s really worth it to
ask that the managers who will be on duty during your weekend be
present in the last few meetings with the hotel leading up to the con.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 140 From: Kevin Roche Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ICG-D] Welcoming Newcomers

> > What neo-friendly ploys have people tried in the past? What worked?
>
> well, there’s the one you guys tried at CC16 😉

For those of you who don’t know this, Andy and I met at the Thursday night
hospitality suite at CC16.

So it very definitely worked.

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 141 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: CC23
We just recently looked at the website and the maps, etc. Unless I missed
something, is the hotel 2 blocks from the theatre where the masqs will be?

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 142 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Hotel staff (and a electrical power story) was Restaurants, Val
I agree about trying to have both sales and set-up staff at a pre-event meeting.
I have also seen sales attempt to say yes to things they shouldn’t. They appear to come from a school that says “don’t say no to a customer”. But when it comes down to it, they might have to require so many extra fees, or some other problems, that the effective answer really should have been “no”. It helps to have experience, and a “sixth sense” what the hotel will be comfortable with.

An interesting situation about power at a con masquerade. One hotel had a big roll-out step-down transformer. Just plug it in the wall, and you get lots of twenty amp circuits. Just plug it in… It took about ten or twenty minutes for me to file off the high spots, in order to get it fully seated. (And the minimal set-up time clock was tickinig.) Be careful what you take for granted. The next year it had been replaced, and I double-checked it before the con.

Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>

<snip>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 143 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/8/2003
Subject: Re: Hotel staff

On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 04:51 PM, Charles Galway wrote:

> I agree about trying to have both sales and set-up staff at a
> pre-event meeting.
> I have also seen sales attempt to say yes to things they shouldn’t.
> They appear to come from a school that says “don’t say no to a
> customer”.

There is a variety of salescritter often found working in hotel sales
who will say anything to get the sale. This is followed up by, as you
mentioned, extra fees, trying to weasel out of the agreement, or just
dumping things on hotel operations. It’s not too unusual at a hotel to
find that the other departments hate the sales staff. Kyym (CC21’s
dealer coordinator) works in hotel operations and we had this
discussion over drinks at some point during the con.

Something that would be helpful I think would be a list of industry
standards and practices; i.e. what’s normally included gratis in the
costs of the hotel contract, what normally costs extra and price ranges.

With knowledge of industry standards and practices, it’s easier to go
in and press the sales person for costs and get them in the contract.
For example, if the contract says “risers to make the stage as
described in the secondary agreement included” then you can either
extort them into buying additional or new risers, or invoke the
liquidated damages clause and reduce your overall cost.


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 144 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

3-5 blocks isn’t walking distance, at least for me. 3 maybe, 5 definitely
not, especially with the time crunch we usually have for meals at CC.
Sandy

>One of the hotels we’re considering for CC26 is the San Jose
>Doubletree. Great function space (two 9.000 sq.ft. ballrooms, one with
>17′ ceilings), plentiful parking, and a great deal of con experience.
>The downside is there are few off-site restaurants within walking
>distance. The nearest are 3-5 blocks away, and that’s a Coco’s, a
>Denny’s, a McDonald’s and the two restaurants at the SJ Hyatt (about 6
>blocks away). On-site food isn’t spectacular, but both the quality and
>service has been getting better over the last few years.
>
>andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 145 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

Seems to me this wasn’t the first time we’ve “hot-wired” a hotel for a
CC. CC’s 6 and 8 come to mind also.

P & S

>As I recall, the one really big facilities problem (I’m sure there were
>assorted little ones) we had was that their electrical engineer/electrician
>had a heart attack, and his backup was out of town and unreachable.
>
>So there was a bunch of the concom along with the hotel management, staring
>at the hookup panel where the ballroom electrical had to be connected for
>the lights, sound etc, and there was *NO ONE* on the hotel staff qualified
>and authorized to do so.
>
>Suddenly the Goodrich Blimp floated down a nearby hallway, and when everyone
>came back to the ballroom, the connections had magically appeared. (and of
>course, since no one on the staff was authorized to touch the panel, no one
>could disconnect them either).
>
>So add “Making sure the hotel has backup staff plans for engineering” to our
>to-do list for running a CC.
>
>Kevin

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 146 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Restaurants, Valentines and CC17 (was Re: Date ideas)

At 10:59 PM 5/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>Seems to me this wasn’t the first time we’ve “hot-wired” a hotel for a
>CC. CC’s 6 and 8 come to mind also.
>
>P & S

Yupper. CC-6’s was pretty scary. DIdn’t know CC-8 had a similar problem.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 147 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23
Correct, but misleading. Those are considered half blocks.
http://www.marriott.com/dpp/map.asp?MarshaCode=SLCOG (for those that want to see the map)
The Ogden Marriott (con hotel) is in the middle of one block, along 24th Street. Head East from the hotel, cross one street, walk that half block, cross another street, and you are at the back door area of the Perry Egyptian Theater (and David Eccles Conference Center). (This Theater is along Highway 89 on the web-map, also called Washington Blvd.) It’s about a five minute walk from the Marriott.

While the transit is inconvient for rehearsals, and the evening shows, we thought it was worthwhile, due to the excellent facilities of the site. Tiered seating, stage lights, proscenium, good sound, great green room (big mirror, etc). The cost was reasonable compared to the cost and set-up of a hotel ballroom.

When we first bid for CC-21, we had not included the Theater, just the Ogden Marriott. Some costumers saw our bid materials, and suggested the the Egyptian Theater would be a good masquerade site. After thouroughly checking it out, it does seem to be a good idea, so we included it in our later bid materials (now CC-23)

It is close enough to walk, for a person, or a person with modest costuming, from the Marriott Hotel. For larger costumes, and other transit needs, we will need to supply a good transportation system.

To add to the considerations, a hotel (Ogden Plaza — sleeping room hotel) is now on the same block as the Theater, and even the David Eccles Conference Center. The Plaza Hotel was not available a few years ago, and the Coference center appeared to be too expensive.

I would be glad to hear additional comments on this issue. I’m sure that similar things have been tried with World-Con. I agree that this is an important point to work on, and I feel good about much of the rest of our site selection.
Charles CC-23

—–Original Message—–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>

We just recently looked at the website and the maps, etc. Unless I missed
something, is the hotel 2 blocks from the theatre where the masqs will be?

Bruce

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 148 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Quick adjustment in lighting, was Restaurants, Valentines

It does remind me of the art show one time at a CONduit. No switch on the wall for that room, just some bare wires — and it’s getting on to later Friday afternoon…
Somehow a wire nut found it’s way onto those wires.
Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>

At 10:59 PM 5/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>Seems to me this wasn’t the first time we’ve “hot-wired” a hotel for a
>CC. CC’s 6 and 8 come to mind also.
>
>P & S

Yupper. CC-6’s was pretty scary. DIdn’t know CC-8 had a similar problem.

–Karen

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 149 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23

It beats all hell out of the commute at NoLaCon! And the schlep through the
heat at Magicon couldn’t have been much fun, either.

Elaine

> Correct, but misleading. Those are considered half blocks.
> http://www.marriott.com/dpp/map.asp?MarshaCode=SLCOG (for those that want

to see the map)

> The Ogden Marriott (con hotel) is in the middle of one block, along 24th

Street. Head East from the hotel, cross one street, walk that half block,
cross another street, and you are at the back door area of the Perry
Egyptian Theater (and David Eccles Conference Center). (This Theater is
along Highway 89 on the web-map, also called Washington Blvd.) It’s about a
five minute walk from the Marriott.

>
> While the transit is inconvient for rehearsals, and the evening shows, we

thought it was worthwhile, due to the excellent facilities of the site.
Tiered seating, stage lights, proscenium, good sound, great green room (big
mirror, etc). The cost was reasonable compared to the cost and set-up of a
hotel ballroom.

>

 

Group: runacc Message: 150 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/9/2003
Subject: Re: Theater location Re: CC23

Having schlepped in costume on foot at Denvention, NolaCon, and MagiCon,
the distance from the hotel to the Egyptian Theatre does not seem
outrageous for what looks like a VERY “worth it” venue.

–Karen

At 03:16 PM 5/9/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>It beats all hell out of the commute at NoLaCon! And the schlep through the
>heat at Magicon couldn’t have been much fun, either.
>
>Elaine
>
> > Correct, but misleading. Those are considered half blocks.
> > http://www.marriott.com/dpp/map.asp?MarshaCode=SLCOG (for those that want
>to see the map)
> > The Ogden Marriott (con hotel) is in the middle of one block, along 24th
>Street. Head East from the hotel, cross one street, walk that half block,
>cross another street, and you are at the back door area of the Perry
>Egyptian Theater (and David Eccles Conference Center). (This Theater is
>along Highway 89 on the web-map, also called Washington Blvd.) It’s about a
>five minute walk from the Marriott.
> >
> > While the transit is inconvient for rehearsals, and the evening shows, we
>thought it was worthwhile, due to the excellent facilities of the site.
>Tiered seating, stage lights, proscenium, good sound, great green room (big
>mirror, etc). The cost was reasonable compared to the cost and set-up of a
>hotel ballroom.
> >
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 2 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 2 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 51 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 52 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Parts 1,2, & 3
Group: runacc Message: 53 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 54 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 55 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 56 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 57 From: Karen Heim Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 58 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)
Group: runacc Message: 59 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 60 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 61 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 62 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 63 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 64 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 65 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 66 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 67 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)
Group: runacc Message: 68 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 69 From: Christine Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Receipts for memberships
Group: runacc Message: 70 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Receipts for memberships/Site Selection Process
Group: runacc Message: 71 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 72 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 73 From: Sharon Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Holiday Weekends (was CC21 Review – Part III)
Group: runacc Message: 74 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)
Group: runacc Message: 75 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates
Group: runacc Message: 76 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 77 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 78 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 79 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 80 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Holiday Weekends (was CC21 Review – Part III)
Group: runacc Message: 81 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 82 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 83 From: Christine Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas
Group: runacc Message: 84 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 85 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 86 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: CC21 Review: Judges’ Perspective
Group: runacc Message: 87 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates
Group: runacc Message: 88 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
Group: runacc Message: 89 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 90 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates
Group: runacc Message: 91 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review: Judges’ Perspective
Group: runacc Message: 92 From: Sharon Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Group: runacc Message: 93 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
Group: runacc Message: 94 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 95 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 96 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 97 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates
Group: runacc Message: 98 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: CC23 and general questions (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review)
Group: runacc Message: 99 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC23 and general questions (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review)
Group: runacc Message: 100 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Outline from the White Board at CC21

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 51 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
Thank you to Bruce, Nora and Karen for a very well written review of the
con. From the “front” there isn’t much more to add.

There are several background issues which should be addressed here, but
I’m still deep in the CC site, and can’t take the time at the moment.

Bruce, would you please boil the three sections down (if possible) to a
single printed page, for inclusion in the next Newsletter?

Any discussion, comments, further remarks from the rest of this list?

Thanks again!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 52 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Parts 1,2, & 3
Bruce, Nora, & Karen:
Thank you for the detailed review of the convention. Give me a day
or two to re-read your e-mails and respond to them in a more complete manner.
I want to put as much thought as the three of you did into my response.

In a nutshell, I appreciate the views you expressed. Some you hit
right on the head, some are news to me, like things in the Green Room, and
some I’d like to explain. I feel that things said in this e-group are more
private and confidential than others.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 53 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

I strongly agree with almost everything they posted. I especially feel that
Easter and Passover should be avoided in future. While there may or may not
be an appreciably larger attendance, it would make for a more comfortable
con in general. Personally, I did not think to pack myself a box of matzoh
since I was sure there would be some at the con suite, as I have seen at
past (general SF/F) cons. My own fault, true, but most of the meat snacks
were of the pork family, so the lack of cheeses and veggies became a problem
for me, if not for others. Also, holiday air fares are higher.

Elaine

> Any discussion, comments, further remarks from the rest of this list?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Betsy
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 54 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

Elaine Mami wrote:
<snip>

> Also, holiday air fares are higher.

Here is where we run into a problem. Holiday air fares are frequently
higher, but holiday hotel rates are generally lower. Also, for a small
convention like CC, which can never hope to “own the hotel”, the only
way to get sufficient function space is probably going to be to schedule
on a holiday weekend in most parts of the country. FWIIW, early Spring
is usually the worst time of the year for hotel bookings and the hotels
are hungry for business, at the same time, the weather can be “iffy”
leaving some people unable to get to the con. There is no perfect
answer. Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.

Thanks –
^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 55 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

Well, considering that we had a major blizzard that weekend right here
this year….I’m not currently in favor of it.

I think if we had to choose a holiday weekend, I’d prefer revisiting
Memorial Day, except that with major regional SF cons having taken that
weekend as their own, we could also lose in draw from them. And with
many historic groups looking at that weekend as the first to get out and
do stuff outdoors, we lose the historic costumers as well.

It will be interesting to see how the next two CCs do, since they’re
both scheduled off-holiday.

Cheers,

Betsy

Martin Gear wrote:

>
> Elaine Mami wrote:
> <snip>
> > Also, holiday air fares are higher.
>

[snip]

Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments

> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.
>
> Thanks –
> ^M^
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 56 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

Well written and well balanced reviews that captured both the strengths and the problems! I agree with much of the comments.

The CC runners’ guide should remind committees to provide receipts for memberships, either in the form of the PR or, if PRs are not restricted to members (i.e., used for publicity), in some other form.

I agree with the comments so far about the advisability of avoiding Easter and Passover. When the CC 24 people asked about when to hold the con, our response was, “Not Easter weekend!”

More later, I hope.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III

Thank you to Bruce, Nora and Karen for a very well written review of the
con. From the “front” there isn’t much more to add.

There are several background issues which should be addressed here, but
I’m still deep in the CC site, and can’t take the time at the moment.

Bruce, would you please boil the three sections down (if possible) to a
single printed page, for inclusion in the next Newsletter?

Any discussion, comments, further remarks from the rest of this list?

Thanks again!

Betsy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 57 From: Karen Heim Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

Martin Gear wrote:

> There is no perfect
> answer. Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.
>

I know nothing of the hotel or travel costs.

However, since we are still strongly in the grip of winter, there is
always the danger of travel delays due to road conditions/airport
closures. Also, most of us like to wander around a little in the town,
try a restaurant, do some shopping. This becomes a much bigger hassle
in February.

Also, that weekend can be affected by Valentine’s Day or, depending on
the timing, the last weekend of partying before Lent.

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 58 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)

Martin Gear said:

> Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.

While I would love to go with a holiday weekend, we’re going to have to go
off-holiday for many reasons.

Easter is right out for numerous reasons. CC21 picked Easter because
Minicon (before they pulled a Boskone) used to be a major midwest costume
venue on Easter weekend and the theory is that it was an open space in
people’s schedules. It was a good working idea. Unfortunately, the
intervening four years kind of washed that tradition away.

CC26? isn’t planning for President’s Day weekend because there is an
established fan-run Dr. Who convention in LA then (and we like going to
it). Also, Sandy and Pierre asked us if we would consider scheduling later
spring so a drive over the rockies might be more reasonable.

CC26? also isn’t planning for Memorial Day weekend because that’s BayCon
and it would be stupid to schedule against our own big local, particularly
since we’re thinking about their hotel.

We’re aiming for the last weekend in April, which should be reasonable
weather (tail end of the rainy season and I-80 should be completely open).
I don’t think that conflicts with any major west coast cons. It should be
a reasonable choice.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 59 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
To all: We LIKED the con being over Easter (BaltiCon’s old weekend), as
Cait didn’t have to miss much school to attend the con. This is a REAL
issue for Maryland schools; too many absences, even for students with
otherwise high grades, and the school administration threatens to make the
student repeat the semester. I sure don’t remember it being this
authoritation when I was in junior high and high school 30+ years ago in
California.

To Henry: Ricky and I also agree with most of what Bruce, Nora, and the
other Karen have told you. Please don’t get defensive and feel you have to
explain everything. Much of what went wrong was invisible to your
attendees, especially the first-timers, who were having Big Fun. Take it as
constructive criticism from the veterans who have been in the trenches and
had their own learning experiences, because you WILL have to fix most of
these things if you expect to run another Costume-Con. [Your facility would
have been completely overwhelmed if you had drawn the attendance you
expected.] And those of you who are on current committees or bid committees
should take special note of the criticisms of CC-21, because you DON’T want
to have those same problems at your conventions.

My two cents, which also has relevance for future cons:

Re Hotel shuttle: There was a lack of shuttle service to the airport on
Thursday night. I had friends from California who made reservations for the
hotel shuttle (or so they thought) and ended up with a VERY expensive taxi
ride instead because there was NO hotel shuttle to be found when they
arrived at the airport. For those of you still in the process of selecting
hotels, PLEASE pick a facility that is close to transportation, as a
significant portion of your membership WILL fly in from out of state. Find
out if there is a hotel shuttle to and from the airport, and whether it is
“courtesy” or “complimentary” (one is free and one is not). I learned this
lesson on CC-1 (whose hotel was a $15 “courtesy” shuttle ride from the
nearest airport, which was a LOT of money in those days. If there is a fee,
PUBLISH IT in your PRs so your membership is not caught unawares.

Re PRs: Yes, I know we live in the Age of the Internet, but not everybody
is online (especially in an artsy-craftsy hobby such as ours), but you HAVE
to mail printed PRs to your membership, and not rely on their getting
information from off your website.

Also re PRs: Please publish a list of paid members at the back of your PRs,
and keep updating it each time you print a new PR. (Also would be prudent
to park it somewhere on the website.) Many people scan through these lists
and decide to go if they see their friends are going. Many of us do not see
each other other than Costume-Con, so it’s kind of a class reuinion type
mindset. Exploit that to its fullest.

Re Masquerades and other stage events:
(1) Get your stage locked in as early as possible, and then get the
information out there. I’m not sure what went wrong at CC-21, and I’m not
sure it was any one person’s fault, but this was a major point of
irritation for a whole lot of attendees who were competing. At CC-6, we
knew what our stage was going to be like (and how many more risers we had
to go rent from a local theatrical supply house to make it happen) before
we even signed a hotel contract, so there is NO excuse for this.
(2) Print award certificates in advance, and have your judges pre-sign a
whole bunch of them while they are waiting around for the masquerade to
start. There is no excuse not to have something to hand every winning entry
at the con. (Note: At the cons I ran, we also gave Certificates of
Appreciation to everyone who participated in the Fashion Show.)
(3) Have an odd number of judges (3 or 5) in order to avoid ties.

Re the convention’s being on a holiday weekend: For every person who
complains about higher airfares and missing out on family obligations,
there will be others who would prefer to have that “extra” day (typically a
paid holiday from work) in order to travel or extend their convention stay.
[I missed a whole lot of Easters to attend EquiCon and BaltiCon, and a
whole lot of Thanksgivings to attend LosCon–with the triple guilt trip
that my parents’ anniversary AND my mother’s birthday fell on Thanksgiving
most years.] Costume-Con was founded on a three-day weekend (Martin Luther
King Day), most of them have been run on three-day weekends, and this is
because the Historical runs so late on Sunday night and it is nice to have
the Monday as a paid day off from work. I can understand the problem with
putting Costume-Con on a religious holiday weekend.
I also understand that two earlier holiday weekends (Martin Luther King and
Presidents) typically have weather problems, particularly in the East (and
problems with Easterners getting to CCs in milder climates due to major
winter storms).

Re advertising: Send flyers to every convention you can think of, and not
just your local ones. WorldCon, WesterCon, BaltiCon, Arisia, LunaCon,
DragonCon, BayCon, Archon, San Diego Comic-Con, Toronto Trek, and the big
anime cons should get flyered for starters. (I’m sure there are others I’m
forgetting.) If you can’t be there in person, ask on this list and the
ICG-D list if anyone is going, and can take flyers for you, and maybe
“push” the con if they are doing panels.
Even if they’re not going themselves, most of them “know” somebody who can.
(Worst case, send a stack of flyers to the convention in care of the
committee member who’s in charge of coordinating fan clubs and special
interest groups at the con–they’ll see they get out on the flyer table. I
served this function for Comic-Con and StarCon for several years.) See if
your local fabric and bead stores will post or distribute flyers about your
event. Ditto any local schools with strong theatrical or fashion
departments. Ditto your local chapter of the SCA, RenFaire, and other
historical re-enactment groups. Send press releases about the con to
magazines such as Threads, Ornament, Belle Armoire, Sew News, etc. At
worst, you’ll get put in the calendar section. At best, they’ll do an
article about you. [David Coffin and a couple of other writers from Threads
attended CC-7 and had a good time, so there’s your “in” there.] Also send
press releases to your local paper(s) and news stations. Again, worst case,
you end up in the Calendar section; best case, they send a reporter to the
con. Many Costume-Cons cut their advertising budget about 6-9 months out
from the convention when the memberships are not rolling in and you’re
panicking over money (I understand about the panic mode, believe me). That
is absolutely the WORST thing you can do–if you don’t get the word out,
nobody knows to come. I’m saddened that Costume-Con only drew around 250
people when based in one of the largest cities in our country (and one that
has always drawn a good attendance for its WorldCon masquerade). Obviously,
the word did not get out.

Re hotel facilities: Costume-Con is a VERY space-intensive convention in
terms of panel rooms, competitions, vendor rooms, and displays. Typically,
a 500-person Costume-Con will need the same sort of facilities as a regular
S/F con drawing an attendance of 1,000 to 2,000. Which is the reason why
you need to cut the best hotel deal you can, and offset as many fees on
this space as possible with room nights. At CC-1, we did a food function (a
luncheon before the Fashion Show) to make the hotel happy. At CC-6, we
ordered coffee/tea services and snacks for the con suite and public areas
of the convention to make the hotel happy. You have to decide what
trade-offs you can make. I am no expert on hotel contracts (we paid $$$$
after CC-1, and our CC-6 contract was negotiated by Michael Siladi, who
negotiates regularly for BayCon and WesterCon), but Marty Gear has promised
to write a comprehensive guide for CC. YOUR HOTEL CONTRACT CAN MAKE YOU OR
BREAK YOU, so this is an area worthy of a lot of attention.

These are the major points I can think of at the moment. Again, let’s find
ways to get all of these ramblings codified so inexperienced committees
don’t have to keep reinventing the wheel. I’m sorry it has not gotten
codified before this. I’ve run 3 CC’s (with memberships ranging from 150 up
to 600 attendees) with NO instructions (and put 500 people through my house
and yard every night for 10 nights every October for the last 10 years,
also with no instructions), but I can understand the need for a blueprint
in order to ensure consistency and excellence from year to year.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 60 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Andy said…

> We’re aiming for the last weekend in April, which should be reasonable
> weather (tail end of the rainy season and I-80 should be completely open).
> I don’t think that conflicts with any major west coast cons. It should be
> a reasonable choice.

This is a valid point. To avoid conflict with any major cons in general,
and to have reasonable travelling weather as well, is the ideal. I clearly
remember the President’s Day weekend snows messing up several cons due to
travel conditions.

To the best of my knowledge, the end of April does not contain any major
East Coast cons either. Byron, Betsy, please correct me if I’m wrong. I’m
clueless about the rest of the country.

I hate to cause a problem here, but what are your thoughts about
establishing a more regular time for CCs? Is this even something worth
thinking about? (I am now ducking behind large furniture.)

Elaine

 

Group: runacc Message: 61 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

I think this is true, Elaine, and still a little early for the
re-enacting events to start kicking in as well.

Our social calendar exploded May 1, and won’t really stop until sometime
after the middle of June. We already have our choice of four different
events, including Balticon, on Memorial Day Saturday alone).

I’m not sure about the south, central or western parts of the country.

Regarding scheduling for a regular weekend: When attempting to get the
best price from the hotel, you kind of need to work with their already
booked schedule. Three (four, really) years out, you have much more
flexibility, but still depending on where you choose to bid your con,
you may run into other regularly scheduled events.

For example, here in Columbia, where two of the CCs were held (CC3 and
CC9), we had Memorial Day and President’s Day weekends respectively. As
I recall, the former was a major problem for our area because there’s an
annual soccer tournament, and all the hotels are booked well in advance
to accommodate all the out of town teams. (I’m certain Marty will
correct me if I’m wrong, here.) I think that’s the main reason we chose
to do CC9 in February. No soccer teams to worry about.

I do think we could try for a narrower window. Or for after Memorial Day
if the school issue is a problem (a valid concern, and one I’ll have to
deal with myself in about another three years). I think, without reading
the passage, that the ConStitution stipulates a tradition, not a
requirement in sticking with the Memorial Day cut-off for the con.

YMMV.

Cheers,

Betsy

Elaine Mami wrote:

>
> Andy said…
>
> To the best of my knowledge, the end of April does not contain any major
> East Coast cons either. Byron, Betsy, please correct me if I’m wrong. I’m
> clueless about the rest of the country.
>
> I hate to cause a problem here, but what are your thoughts about
> establishing a more regular time for CCs? Is this even something worth
> thinking about? (I am now ducking behind large furniture.)
>
> Elaine
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 62 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

I think the problem there would be that the “ideal date” (determined by
weather) would vary considerably depending on where a CC is being held.
Traditionally April has been fairly nice, consistent weather in St. Louis.
The last 2 years it’s been relatively nice in March, rainy and cold to hot
in April though early May. You see the dilemma.
Also having checked the holidays for 2007 (the year of CC25), Easter is
April 8th and Passover is the 2nd through 26th.

Nora

From: “Elaine Mami” <vze3zdpc@verizon.net>

> I hate to cause a problem here, but what are your thoughts about
> establishing a more regular time for CCs? Is this even something worth
> thinking about? (I am now ducking behind large furniture.)
> Elaine

 

Group: runacc Message: 63 From: Elaine Mami Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

> Also having checked the holidays for 2007 (the year of CC25), Easter is
> April 8th and Passover is the 2nd through 26th.

That’s not possible. Passover is only (!) 8 days long! Please check those
dates again.

Also, I am not advocating trying to totally avoid Passover. That’s not
logical, for one thing, and not necessary, either. My point re: Passover
was that the food options were limited, and I had not prepared for that.
Had I been planning better, I would have provided for myself. Also, I
totally avoided starving! However, the idea here is to gather enough
information for future concoms to avoid the same mistakes that have already
been made.

For instance, I remember Balticons always had notices of where Easter
services were being held, often had small Seders, and had a variety of foods
in the con suite to please most (but never all) attendees. I know Marty
will correct me if I’m mis-remembering.

How does this sound? – take a page or two from Balticon, and publish a list
of local churches and synagogues (with their service times), as well as a
comprehensive dining guide.

Elaine

 

Group: runacc Message: 64 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

From: “Elaine Mami” <vze3zdpc@verizon.net>

> > Also having checked the holidays for 2007 (the year of CC25), Easter is
> > April 8th and Passover is the 2nd through 26th.
> That’s not possible. Passover is only (!) 8 days long! Please check

those

> dates again.

Okay, so now the secret’s out – I don’t observe Passover.
I got that info from an online holiday calendar; obviously an inaccurate
one – I willdouble-check. (It did seem rather long to me, but what do I
know?)
Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 65 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

At 09:59 PM 5/4/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>I do think we could try for a narrower window. Or for after Memorial Day
>if the school issue is a problem (a valid concern, and one I’ll have to
>deal with myself in about another three years). I think, without reading
>the passage, that the ConStitution stipulates a tradition, not a
>requirement in sticking with the Memorial Day cut-off for the con.

Remember, folks, that *I* have to approve the bid. And if someone bids for
a date outside the “traditional” window for Costume-Con, I have every right
to deny them. The precedent is the Southern California bid for CC18 that
attempted to move CC to a July date and combine it with Costume College. As
Captain Hook would say, “Bad form.”

There is a broad “window” in the spring for Costume-Con specifically to try
to avoid conflicts with local events, and to try to give committees as much
flexibility as possible. The spring window is also to avoid running
Costume-Con up against WesterCon and WorldCon, for people who are trying to
make new competition costumes for those events.

As for avoiding holiday weekends to avoid conflicts with other cons, it’s
damn near impossible. There is a con with a masquerade going on somewhere
in the country (or in Canada) just about every weekend of the year. Or you
end up conflicting with SCA Twelfth Night. (We chose our dates for CC-2 so
as not to conflict with the local Twelfth Night, and then some other
royalty came into power, and changed the dates, so we ended up bending
ourselves all out of shape for nothing.) Or RenFaire. Or whatever. It’s
best to just pick a date somewhere within the specified range and go for it.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 66 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III
CONduit has printed a code on the mailing label indicating paid membership. Since the PRs are sent bulk mail (not likely for CC23), differing insertions are not permitted in bulk mail.
Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Byron Connell <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>

The CC runners’ guide should remind committees to provide receipts for memberships, either in the form of the PR or, if PRs are not restricted to members (i.e., used for publicity), in some other form.

More later, I hope.

Byron

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 67 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)
That reasoning is very similar to the date selected for CC-23 (Utah). One of our earlier bids was for late march/early april, but at CC-18, some folks were afraid of blizzards in the mountains. Some of our tentative West Coast vendors warned us of some major events on Holiday weekends. We also had a problem of bumping up against the major local CONduit, which was between Mother’s Day and Memorial (but has now moved to Memorial day).

So we have that same date (as the CC-26 bid — end of April-early may) for CC-23.

We may bump into an SCA event, but we learned from CONduit that trying to miss those events can be like the Twelth Night story mentioned elsewhere here.

(Hope you can make it over here Andy)
Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew Trembley <attrembl@bovil.com>
<snip>
We’re aiming for the last weekend in April, which should be reasonable
weather (tail end of the rainy season and I-80 should be completely open).
I don’t think that conflicts with any major west coast cons. It should be
a reasonable choice.

andy

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 68 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review
This brings up a few points:

Dave Doering has set up a on-line data file service, which I’m hoping will help our concom keep track of some communication. I’ll let you know about it’s effectiveness, as we progress.

I wondered if we should list paid members? It sounds like the answer is yes (unless they request we don’t).

Working on the masquerade for CONduit, we very rarely get the stage we thought we designed. Partly our fault, and partly the hotel. (I have worked both on masquerade, and on hotel liason.) This should not be a problem for CC-23 since we are planning on using a theater.

What is “A LOT” of money for a shuttle fare? We have shuttle service to our hotel, not complimentary. We are aware that can be a bit of a problem, but noticed other CC’s were outside the major city (Chicago, Atlanta) The costs per person drop for multiple riders, but we are still working on how to try to coordinate this.

The hotel costs are very scary for our CC, and I would be interested in learning more. We did have a choice of charging more per room, and getting a cut rate on convention space. We opted for cheap rooms, but boy, it makes the hotel cost intimidating. It could make a difference if there are lots of cheap rooms close by. It would not make sense to scare everyone away from the hotel, and then not make the room-count price-break. If no cheaper hotels a close by, then it is safer to let the room rates rise a bit.

I joined the Chicago Yahoo chat list. I thought I could learn something by eaves-dropping. Whatever happened at Chicago, did not happen on the list. (CONduit has a chat-list, and it’s used quite a bit, but is not considered official. Which is not to say the things don’t get turned into policy anyway.)

Charles

—–Original Message—–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 69 From: Christine Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Receipts for memberships
Receipts for paid con memberships are GOOD! However, what no one else noted
re: CC21 is that (at least when I went to hand in Byron’s and mine) the Site
Selection table was not giving out receipts for checks received with
ballots, and in fact the person there gave me a really blank look when I
said that I wanted one. I had to vigorously INSIST upon getting something
in writing. As it was, what I got was a torn-off scrap of lined paper from
a note pad. After a certain CC which shall remain nameless lost all record
of people who had site selected (and who therefore had a credit toward con
membership), I personally am not prepared to hand over my money without some
tangible proof that it was received. It’s like an umbrella – if you carry
it, it won’t rain; if you don’t, it’ll pour. The old “your cancelled check
will be your receipt” line doesn’t work any more, in these days when banks
charge you extra to get them back, and when you may not find out until many
months later that the con committee either lost your check or failed to
record it properly.

Also, CC committees who send representatives to other CC’s, as well as
WorldCon or large regionals, should always have a list of paid members at
their table with them, showing both supporting and attending members.

Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 70 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Receipts for memberships/Site Selection Process

This is a good point.

Although I offered to assist the process earlier (by at least a few
months) for CC24, there was no follow-through. When the time came to
count the ballots, I was asked to help by this year’s site selection
commissioner.

That’s when I found out the individuals who collected the money had
failed to record many of the individuals’ payment methods at all,
because the responsibility for collecting the funds was delegated
without giving instructions to the individuals who were collecting them.

This represented two problems:

1. Wasting an hour while we sorted through each ballot and certified the
method of payment.
2. Finding one travellers check made out to the ICG(!).

We spent so much time looking at the dollar amounts, it didn’t even
occur to me to check the address blocks for complete information. And
because CC21’s badges did not have membership numbers printed (as is
stipulated in the ConStitution), it’s going to be harder for CC24 to
match up for missing data.

I would have thought that the process Karen outlined in the ConStitution
would be enough for management of the site selection process. We’re
lucky that there was only one bid this year, since that makes the
management a little easier, but still, I’m not sure what happened there.

And concerning depositing of those funds: The checks need to be cleared
within 90 days, or the checks go stale. There were issues with
depositing the checks received from CC21 that should be avoided in the
future.

I think this needs to be addressed more fully.

Betsy

Christine Connell wrote:

>
> Receipts for paid con memberships are GOOD! However, what no one else noted
> re: CC21 is that (at least when I went to hand in Byron’s and mine) the Site
> Selection table was not giving out receipts for checks received with
> ballots, and in fact the person there gave me a really blank look when I
> said that I wanted one. I had to vigorously INSIST upon getting something
> in writing. As it was, what I got was a torn-off scrap of lined paper from
> a note pad. After a certain CC which shall remain nameless lost all record
> of people who had site selected (and who therefore had a credit toward con
> membership), I personally am not prepared to hand over my money without some
> tangible proof that it was received. It’s like an umbrella – if you carry
> it, it won’t rain; if you don’t, it’ll pour. The old “your cancelled check
> will be your receipt” line doesn’t work any more, in these days when banks
> charge you extra to get them back, and when you may not find out until many
> months later that the con committee either lost your check or failed to
> record it properly.
>
> Also, CC committees who send representatives to other CC’s, as well as
> WorldCon or large regionals, should always have a list of paid members at
> their table with them, showing both supporting and attending members.
>
> Tina


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 71 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Um… I know when WorldCon generally is. When is WesterCon? Just
curious….

Cheers,

Betsy

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> At 09:59 PM 5/4/2003 -0400, you wrote:

[snip]

> The spring window is also to avoid running
> Costume-Con up against WesterCon and WorldCon, for people who are trying to
> make new competition costumes for those events.


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 72 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

In a message dated 5/4/2003 6:15:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> hen the CC 24 people asked about when to hold the con, our response was,
> “Not Easter weekend!”

In quick response to that particular matter with CC21, I didn’t pick that
weekend. I would have moved it one week either way.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 73 From: Sharon Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Holiday Weekends (was CC21 Review – Part III)

The problem I saw was large hotels did not want to commit three years
in advance to a small gathering, such as CC, that wanted most of
their function space, weren’t going to take up an equivalent number
of guest rooms, and had little need for catered food because a better
group could come along in that time.

A holiday weekend in a town that thrives on tourism might hurt the
bid getting the best facilities that far in advance. The hotels
would much rather cut their best deal three to six months in advance
of the event – goes without saying, that’s impractical for our needs.

In a town that doesn’t have a lot of tourism, it would help getting a
large hotel, but then the bid would have to educate the rest of us
about the location’s offerings.

Another drawback is that some things are closed during some holidays,
but not others – like the American Girls Store was closed Sunday. In
case you didn’t know, Chicago is the only location of an American
Girls store. It’s probably open during ‘shopping’ holidays like
President’s Day, Columbus Day …

The only other thought I have is great location/atmosphere – poor
transportation or hotel options, could also hinder a CC.

Sharon

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, Martin Gear <MartinGear@c…> wrote in
part:

There is no perfect

> answer. Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.
>
> Thanks –
> ^M^

 

Group: runacc Message: 74 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)

CC22 went with an early April date to avoid con:
1. – avoid conflicts with the Holidays (Easter is the week after, and
Passover doesn’t start until the Wednesday after the Con, so even if you
stay until Tuesday, you should make it home in time. We will also have a
listing of all the local churches and synagogue, for those who might wish to
attend Palm Sunday services or Friday evening services)

2. – the weather in Atlanta at that time of year is usually pretty good, not
too hot, not too cold. The past three years it has been in the low 70’s on
our dates. We did worry a little bit about the folks coming from the West,
but we are hoping that it won’t be too awful for them. (of course, next year
we will undoubtedly have either a heat wave or a blizzard, just to spite us)

3. – it avoids most of the local festivals and conventions. RenFest doesn’t
start until the end of April, so the Rennies can come. The re-enactors also
don’t start gearing up until later in the month, so we hope they can make
it. The Dogwood Festival is usually that weekend, but in another part of
town, so you can pop outside and watch the hot air balloons go over without
dealing with the crowds.

4. – It’s just so darn pretty that time of year.

Trudy

>From: “Andrew Trembley” <attrembl@bovil.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Date ideas (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III)
>Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Martin Gear said:
> > Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> > regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.
>
>While I would love to go with a holiday weekend, we’re going to have to go
>off-holiday for many reasons.
>
>Easter is right out for numerous reasons. CC21 picked Easter because
>Minicon (before they pulled a Boskone) used to be a major midwest costume
>venue on Easter weekend and the theory is that it was an open space in
>people’s schedules. It was a good working idea. Unfortunately, the
>intervening four years kind of washed that tradition away.
>
>CC26? isn’t planning for President’s Day weekend because there is an
>established fan-run Dr. Who convention in LA then (and we like going to
>it). Also, Sandy and Pierre asked us if we would consider scheduling later
>spring so a drive over the rockies might be more reasonable.
>
>CC26? also isn’t planning for Memorial Day weekend because that’s BayCon
>and it would be stupid to schedule against our own big local, particularly
>since we’re thinking about their hotel.
>
>We’re aiming for the last weekend in April, which should be reasonable
>weather (tail end of the rainy season and I-80 should be completely open).
>I don’t think that conflicts with any major west coast cons. It should be
>a reasonable choice.
>
>andy
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 75 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates
In regard to the dates, in the Midwest area, I cannot recommend February at
all! I was involved with a convention here in Milwaukee back in ’95 that was
severely hurt that year by a cold snap and snow. It sank attendance to the
point that there was no next year and the ones in charge, including me, had
to pay out of our pockets for the hotel bill.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 76 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review

Just wanted to say that I am printing all this stuff out and hauling it to
the committee meeting this weekend. Keep going guys, you all were handing
out plenty of useful advice before and during the con, and I am really
appreciating all of it. There’s a lot of stuff that we may think that we
have covered, and then something else pops up that we have to consider. The
less of it that comes as a surprise, the happier I’ll be.

Trudy

>From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [runacc] CC21 Review
>Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 21:03:18 -0400
>
>To all: We LIKED the con being over Easter (BaltiCon’s old weekend), as
>Cait didn’t have to miss much school to attend the con. This is a REAL
>issue for Maryland schools; too many absences, even for students with
>otherwise high grades, and the school administration threatens to make the
>student repeat the semester. I sure don’t remember it being this
>authoritation when I was in junior high and high school 30+ years ago in
>California.
>
>To Henry: Ricky and I also agree with most of what Bruce, Nora, and the
>other Karen have told you. Please don’t get defensive and feel you have to
>explain everything. Much of what went wrong was invisible to your
>attendees, especially the first-timers, who were having Big Fun. Take it as
>constructive criticism from the veterans who have been in the trenches and
>had their own learning experiences, because you WILL have to fix most of
>these things if you expect to run another Costume-Con. [Your facility would
>have been completely overwhelmed if you had drawn the attendance you
>expected.] And those of you who are on current committees or bid committees
>should take special note of the criticisms of CC-21, because you DON’T want
>to have those same problems at your conventions.
>
>My two cents, which also has relevance for future cons:
>
>Re Hotel shuttle: There was a lack of shuttle service to the airport on
>Thursday night. I had friends from California who made reservations for the
>hotel shuttle (or so they thought) and ended up with a VERY expensive taxi
>ride instead because there was NO hotel shuttle to be found when they
>arrived at the airport. For those of you still in the process of selecting
>hotels, PLEASE pick a facility that is close to transportation, as a
>significant portion of your membership WILL fly in from out of state. Find
>out if there is a hotel shuttle to and from the airport, and whether it is
>”courtesy” or “complimentary” (one is free and one is not). I learned this
>lesson on CC-1 (whose hotel was a $15 “courtesy” shuttle ride from the
>nearest airport, which was a LOT of money in those days. If there is a fee,
>PUBLISH IT in your PRs so your membership is not caught unawares.
>
>Re PRs: Yes, I know we live in the Age of the Internet, but not everybody
>is online (especially in an artsy-craftsy hobby such as ours), but you HAVE
>to mail printed PRs to your membership, and not rely on their getting
>information from off your website.
>
>Also re PRs: Please publish a list of paid members at the back of your PRs,
>and keep updating it each time you print a new PR. (Also would be prudent
>to park it somewhere on the website.) Many people scan through these lists
>and decide to go if they see their friends are going. Many of us do not see
>each other other than Costume-Con, so it’s kind of a class reuinion type
>mindset. Exploit that to its fullest.
>
>Re Masquerades and other stage events:
>(1) Get your stage locked in as early as possible, and then get the
>information out there. I’m not sure what went wrong at CC-21, and I’m not
>sure it was any one person’s fault, but this was a major point of
>irritation for a whole lot of attendees who were competing. At CC-6, we
>knew what our stage was going to be like (and how many more risers we had
>to go rent from a local theatrical supply house to make it happen) before
>we even signed a hotel contract, so there is NO excuse for this.
>(2) Print award certificates in advance, and have your judges pre-sign a
>whole bunch of them while they are waiting around for the masquerade to
>start. There is no excuse not to have something to hand every winning entry
>at the con. (Note: At the cons I ran, we also gave Certificates of
>Appreciation to everyone who participated in the Fashion Show.)
>(3) Have an odd number of judges (3 or 5) in order to avoid ties.
>
>Re the convention’s being on a holiday weekend: For every person who
>complains about higher airfares and missing out on family obligations,
>there will be others who would prefer to have that “extra” day (typically a
>paid holiday from work) in order to travel or extend their convention stay.
>[I missed a whole lot of Easters to attend EquiCon and BaltiCon, and a
>whole lot of Thanksgivings to attend LosCon–with the triple guilt trip
>that my parents’ anniversary AND my mother’s birthday fell on Thanksgiving
>most years.] Costume-Con was founded on a three-day weekend (Martin Luther
>King Day), most of them have been run on three-day weekends, and this is
>because the Historical runs so late on Sunday night and it is nice to have
>the Monday as a paid day off from work. I can understand the problem with
>putting Costume-Con on a religious holiday weekend.
>I also understand that two earlier holiday weekends (Martin Luther King and
>Presidents) typically have weather problems, particularly in the East (and
>problems with Easterners getting to CCs in milder climates due to major
>winter storms).
>
>Re advertising: Send flyers to every convention you can think of, and not
>just your local ones. WorldCon, WesterCon, BaltiCon, Arisia, LunaCon,
>DragonCon, BayCon, Archon, San Diego Comic-Con, Toronto Trek, and the big
>anime cons should get flyered for starters. (I’m sure there are others I’m
>forgetting.) If you can’t be there in person, ask on this list and the
>ICG-D list if anyone is going, and can take flyers for you, and maybe
>”push” the con if they are doing panels.
>Even if they’re not going themselves, most of them “know” somebody who can.
>(Worst case, send a stack of flyers to the convention in care of the
>committee member who’s in charge of coordinating fan clubs and special
>interest groups at the con–they’ll see they get out on the flyer table. I
>served this function for Comic-Con and StarCon for several years.) See if
>your local fabric and bead stores will post or distribute flyers about your
>event. Ditto any local schools with strong theatrical or fashion
>departments. Ditto your local chapter of the SCA, RenFaire, and other
>historical re-enactment groups. Send press releases about the con to
>magazines such as Threads, Ornament, Belle Armoire, Sew News, etc. At
>worst, you’ll get put in the calendar section. At best, they’ll do an
>article about you. [David Coffin and a couple of other writers from Threads
>attended CC-7 and had a good time, so there’s your “in” there.] Also send
>press releases to your local paper(s) and news stations. Again, worst case,
>you end up in the Calendar section; best case, they send a reporter to the
>con. Many Costume-Cons cut their advertising budget about 6-9 months out
>from the convention when the memberships are not rolling in and you’re
>panicking over money (I understand about the panic mode, believe me). That
>is absolutely the WORST thing you can do–if you don’t get the word out,
>nobody knows to come. I’m saddened that Costume-Con only drew around 250
>people when based in one of the largest cities in our country (and one that
>has always drawn a good attendance for its WorldCon masquerade). Obviously,
>the word did not get out.
>
>Re hotel facilities: Costume-Con is a VERY space-intensive convention in
>terms of panel rooms, competitions, vendor rooms, and displays. Typically,
>a 500-person Costume-Con will need the same sort of facilities as a regular
>S/F con drawing an attendance of 1,000 to 2,000. Which is the reason why
>you need to cut the best hotel deal you can, and offset as many fees on
>this space as possible with room nights. At CC-1, we did a food function (a
>luncheon before the Fashion Show) to make the hotel happy. At CC-6, we
>ordered coffee/tea services and snacks for the con suite and public areas
>of the convention to make the hotel happy. You have to decide what
>trade-offs you can make. I am no expert on hotel contracts (we paid $$$$
>after CC-1, and our CC-6 contract was negotiated by Michael Siladi, who
>negotiates regularly for BayCon and WesterCon), but Marty Gear has promised
>to write a comprehensive guide for CC. YOUR HOTEL CONTRACT CAN MAKE YOU OR
>BREAK YOU, so this is an area worthy of a lot of attention.
>
>These are the major points I can think of at the moment. Again, let’s find
>ways to get all of these ramblings codified so inexperienced committees
>don’t have to keep reinventing the wheel. I’m sorry it has not gotten
>codified before this. I’ve run 3 CC’s (with memberships ranging from 150 up
>to 600 attendees) with NO instructions (and put 500 people through my house
>and yard every night for 10 nights every October for the last 10 years,
>also with no instructions), but I can understand the need for a blueprint
>in order to ensure consistency and excellence from year to year.
>
>–Karen
>

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 77 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review

In a message dated 5/4/2003 8:00:30 PM Central Daylight Time,
castleb@pulsenet.com writes:

> Please don’t get defensive and feel you have to
> explain everything.

Karen, and all,
Part of the reason that I decided to give myself a couple days to
respond was to let in sink in and not be defensive. I worked very hard on
CC21, to the point of putting my life on hold till now. I do admit that it
should have been better. My staff and I are con working vets, but, yes, there
are differences between SF cons and CC’s. There are similarities, also. I
still have a great deal of pride in CC21. And when I fully respond to the
criticism, I am going to try hard to put that aside, and acknowledge it when
it does creep up.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 78 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

Betsy Delaney wrote:

>

<snip>

> For example, here in Columbia, where two of the CCs were held (CC3 and
> CC9), we had Memorial Day and President’s Day weekends respectively. As
> I recall, the former was a major problem for our area because there’s an
> annual soccer tournament, and all the hotels are booked well in advance
> to accommodate all the out of town teams. (I’m certain Marty will
> correct me if I’m wrong, here.) I think that’s the main reason we chose
> to do CC9 in February. No soccer teams to worry about.

Sorry Betsy, but according to my records, we’ve held all three Baltimore
area CC’s over Memorial Day weekend. That was Disclave’s weekend, and
since Disclave did not generally do a masquerade, we offered a special
rate to Disclave members who wanted to come to Costume Con just for the
masquerades.

The soccer tournament was not a major problem for CC-3 although as Kathy
Sanders put it, “We were expecting (bass voice) SOCCER PLAYERS and we
got (falsetto voice) soccer players.” During that weekend the Hilton
was the headquarters hotel for the tournament and most of the teams
stayed with families in the area. By CC-9, the tournament has expanded
and we had a lot more soccer families staying at the Columbia Inn. Also
it became obvious that the Columbia Inn really did not have sufficient
function space for the size that Costume Con had become. We held CC-15
in downtown Baltimore over Memorial Day weekend because all of the
suburban hotels were now booked solid because of soccer tournaments in
the area. Given that, and the fact that BaltiCon [very costumer friendly
for those of you who never been] is now on Memorial Day weekend, I would
doubt that we will see any East Coast CC’s using that weekend.

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 79 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

At 10:24 AM 5/5/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Um… I know when WorldCon generally is. When is WesterCon? Just
>curious….

July 4 weekend.

It rotates around. Has been as far west as Hawaii and as far east as Denver.

In the day, it consistently drew attendance of 2,000 people and
consistently put 40 or 50 masquerade entries on stage. I’m sure the numbers
are down there, as they are down everywhere else.

–Karen

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 80 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Holiday Weekends (was CC21 Review – Part III)

At 03:41 PM 5/5/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>A holiday weekend in a town that thrives on tourism might hurt the
>bid getting the best facilities that far in advance.

Doesn’t even have to be a holiday wekeend.

San Diego, where the first two CC’s were held, is a tourist town with
fairly good weather all year (a cold winter is 50 degrees, LOL!). It was
very difficult to negotiate a decent hotel contract, because they could
always fill the space at non-convention rates, so why give us a break?

>The only other thought I have is great location/atmosphere – poor
>transportation or hotel options, could also hinder a CC.

You’re describing CC-7 in Albany, NY, which had a beautiful hotel, but was
in the middle of nowhere, no direct flights to it, airport that could only
handle small planes, etc. I had a *great* time, but the con was poorly
attended and lost money.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 81 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

CC 9: February, 15 – 18, 1991

I clearly remember Rusty Dawe and several other Californians going out
to play in the snow at the Con Suite that weekend.

It wasn’t a lot of snow, but it was definitely February.

Betsy

ps: If that wasn’t the logic, then I don’t remember why we chose to do
President’s Day.

pps: re: My suggestion for going past Memorial Day: I was thinking mid
June because students stood less chance of missing school. On the other
hand, while thinking about it at lunch, I realize that May 1 is also
frequently the start of peak season for tourist time, and hotels
generally charge more. Memorial Day is generally an exception.

I’m not opposed to Easter Weekend (Elaine raises some good points), and
since we’re not particularly religious, missing either Passover or
Easter isn’t that big a deal to us. Besides, I found a perfectly
acceptable “spring egg hunt” this year that was held the weekend before
Easter, taking it completely out of the realm of religion. I generally
prefer my holidays to be secular, anyway.

Finally: ppps: I meant to start the whole message with “Playing devil’s
advocate here…” Lack of sleep and too much housework and computerwork,
plus mommy-work at play here.

Carry on.

Cheers,

Betsy

Martin Gear wrote:

>
> Sorry Betsy, but according to my records, we’ve held all three Baltimore
> area CC’s over Memorial Day weekend. That was Disclave’s weekend, and
> since Disclave did not generally do a masquerade, we offered a special
> rate to Disclave members who wanted to come to Costume Con just for the
> masquerades.


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 82 From: Martin Gear Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review

Charles Galway wrote:
<snip>

> Working on the masquerade for CONduit, we very rarely get the stage we thought we designed. Partly our fault, and partly the hotel.

This should never happen! All the hotel contracts that I have negotiated
(3 Costume Cons, 12 BaltiCons and two WorldCon) have had the stage
drawings/specifications as a part of the contract signed off by both the
Sales Critter and the Hotel’s General Manager. This meant that I
personally examined the facility’s risers, determined if there were any
that were in such poor condition that they could not be used, and found
a source for renting additional risers if we needed to do so. For
CC-15, two of the hotel’s risers had been damaged and not replaced, and
I used the contract specs to convince the hotel that they needed to
rent/borrow additional risers from an adjacent hotel. Anyone
negotiating hotel contracts should become intimately familiar with the
term “Liquidated Damages Clause”.

I expect to have a copy of the “Draft WorldCon Hotel Contract” annotated
for Costume Cons available for this list by the end of this month.
Anyone who is bidding for a CC should read it and even if you have
signed a hotel contract it would be worth while to look it over to make
certain that you have the critical stuff included in your hotel contract
and if not, get an addendum to the contract that you already have to
prevent the problems mentioned.

Marty

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 83 From: Christine Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: Date ideas

I thought I remembered that also. I seem to remember hearing glad cries of
“look, it snowed!”

Actually, what I mostly remembered, unless I’m mixing it up with another
con, was the grueling trip down from Albany through the thick of a blizzard
in south-central NY and eastern PA. Byron doesn’t “do” snow if he can help
it, so I got to drive from somewhere around Oneonta (as I recall – it may
have been further south) down to southern PA, where the snow finally deigned
to change over to rain. There were semi-trailers off the road everywhere,
especially on the steep downhill grades in the mountains! Not to mention
the idiots who assume that if you have 4-wheel drive, you can go zipping
along at 60 on the snow! The drive down on the snow didn’t scare me; it was
the other drivers who scared me!

And then we got heavy fog in the mountains around Scranton – Wilkes Barre on
the way home. Byron doesn’t like to “do” fog either if he can help it.

PS: Somewhere, buried in a box, we may even have some photos of them
reveling in the snow. I vaguely recall snapping some pictures of the
occasion.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: “Betsy Delaney” <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Date ideas

> CC 9: February, 15 – 18, 1991
>
> I clearly remember Rusty Dawe and several other Californians going out
> to play in the snow at the Con Suite that weekend.
>
> It wasn’t a lot of snow, but it was definitely February.
>
> Betsy
>
>>

 

Group: runacc Message: 84 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

At present we have a CC “season” that runs from Presidents’ Day Weekend through Memorial Day Weekend. That gives concoms flexibility to pick the date for the con, which can be an advantage in terms of availability of hotel/facility. One disadvantage is that, because the con floats in time as well as space, costumers cannot rely on its being on a specific weekend. On the other hand, fixing the weekend for CC will put into competition with some sf con somewhere in North America, so the question is which approach results in the greater disadvantage.

Presidents’ Day Weekend is neither a traditional “family” holiday nor a major religious holiday, so it does not have the disadvantage of Easter/Passover. The major disadvantage is weather, but for much of North America that holds true for the rest of February and March. Albany has had snow in May!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC21 Review – Part III

Well, considering that we had a major blizzard that weekend right here
this year….I’m not currently in favor of it.

I think if we had to choose a holiday weekend, I’d prefer revisiting
Memorial Day, except that with major regional SF cons having taken that
weekend as their own, we could also lose in draw from them. And with
many historic groups looking at that weekend as the first to get out and
do stuff outdoors, we lose the historic costumers as well.

It will be interesting to see how the next two CCs do, since they’re
both scheduled off-holiday.

Cheers,

Betsy

Martin Gear wrote:
>
> Elaine Mami wrote:
> <snip>
> > Also, holiday air fares are higher.
>

[snip]

Keeping all this in mind, I’d be interested to see comments
> regarding the choice of “Presidents’ Day” weekend for a CC.
>
> Thanks –
> ^M^
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 85 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

At 08:51 PM 5/5/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>One disadvantage is that, because the con floats in time as well as space,
>costumers cannot rely on its being on a specific weekend.

On the other hand, the way site selection is now handled, potential members
will know three years out where and when a given CC will be so they can
make plans accordingly.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 86 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: CC21 Review: Judges’ Perspective
A few comments about the CC 21 SF&F masquerade from the judges’ perspective.

First, the judges’ table had no lights, just glow sticks for us to use as we wrote notes about the entries. The glow sticks were useless to provide enough illumination to see what we were writing. I would encourage concoms to provide lights for the judges’ table. If there is a concern about glare for the audience, the lights can be covered with a blue gel; I have judged at some cons where that was done and we had sufficient light to see by.

Second, as a judge I strongly prefer having my own set of judge’s forms rather than having only a single set either passed back and forth among the judges or kept in the hands of the judges’ clerk. At the CC 21 SF&F masquerade, there was only one set of the forms and we entrusted them to our clerk (Eileen Cates).

Third, I think the other two judges will agree with me that, from the judges’ perspective, the CC 21 SF&F masquerade MC’s performance was OK, but not great. He kept forgetting to announce the division in which an entry appeared. This was quite annoying, because judges look at an entry quite differently if it is in the Novice division than if it is in the Master division. At one point, we sent Eileen up to the podium to ask the MC to please announce the divisions. He started to do so but soon forgot our request and relapsed.

From a personal perspective, I note that the MC forgot to introduce the judges and would have not done so had we not prompted him from the table. He also did not make the usual opening comments about “no flash photography,” and so forth. Perhaps there may be less need for such announcements at a CC than at an sf con, but it only takes one ignorant neo with a camera and flash to cause a significant hazard for those on stage. Since Costume-Cons seek to attract members who had not attended CCs before, I urge that such announcements be a standard part of the instruction to the MC for opening comments (together with introduction of the judges).

Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 87 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates

> In regard to the dates, in the Midwest area, I cannot recommend February

at

> all! I was involved with a convention here in Milwaukee back in ’95 that

was

> severely hurt that year by a cold snap and snow. It sank attendance to the
> point that there was no next year and the ones in charge, including me,

had

> to pay out of our pockets for the hotel bill.
> Henry Osier

Granted February isn’t always great here either but there’s a world of
difference between “Midwest” Milwaukee (which I think of as North) and
“Midwest” St. Louis (considerably further South).

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 88 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/5/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review

—– Original Message —–
From: Charles Galway
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC21 Review

>I wondered if we should list paid members? It sounds like the answer is yes (unless request >we don’t).

Why would you give them a choice?

>What is “A LOT” of money for a shuttle fare? We have shuttle service to our hotel, not >complimentary. We are aware that can be a bit of a problem, but noticed other CC’s were >outside the major city (Chicago, Atlanta) The costs per person drop for multiple riders, but >we are still working on how to try to coordinate this.

I have been happy to pay a flat $20 for a cab from O’Hare to an off-airport hotel in the Chicago area, compared to the about $50 I understand would be run up on the meter.

Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 89 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates
We had been getting prices quoted of about $26 one-way, with additional reductions for multiple passengers. While annoying, I considered this to be acceptable, IF the hotel, food, membership, air-fares were all at a reasonable rate. (Which we’re trying to do.) We plan to post current rates later, closer to one year out. (and maybe work out a group rate.)
Charles CC-23

—–Original Message—–
From: Byron Connell <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>
<snip>
I have been happy to pay a flat $20 for a cab from O’Hare to an off-airport hotel in the Chicago area, compared to the about $50 I understand would be run up on the meter.

Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 90 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates

At 10:43 AM 5/5/2003, you wrote:

>In regard to the dates, in the Midwest area, I cannot recommend February at
>all! I was involved with a convention here in Milwaukee back in ’95 that was
>severely hurt that year by a cold snap and snow. It sank attendance to the
>point that there was no next year and the ones in charge, including me, had
>to pay out of our pockets for the hotel bill.
>Henry Osier

I take it you didn’t have an Act of God clause in your contract?

Pierre

>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 91 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review: Judges’ Perspective

From: “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@nycap.rr.com>

> First, the judges’ table had no lights, just glow sticks for us to use as

we wrote notes about the entries. The glow sticks were useless to provide
enough illumination to see what we were writing. I would encourage concoms
to provide lights for the judges’ table. If there is a concern about glare
for the audience, the lights can be covered with a blue gel; I have judged
at some cons where that was done and we had sufficient light to see by.<

I totally spaced on lights until Saturday evening. We’ve got a small set of
battery operated lamps here at home for such things (but home isn’t
Chicago). The lightsticks were a last-minute attempt to do something. Had I
been smart, I would have first asked Ops if they had any lights available.

> Second, as a judge I strongly prefer having my own set of judge’s forms

rather than having only a single set either passed back and forth among the
judges or kept in the hands of the judges’ clerk. At the CC 21 SF&F
masquerade, there was only one set of the forms and we entrusted them to our
clerk (Eileen Capes).<

Agreed. For a small masquerade, a set of blank forms for each judge is
sufficient (I know, I just judged a small masquerade this weekend). For
WorldCon or CC completed copies with all information are necessary
(including one set for the clerk).

> Third, I think the other two judges will agree with me that, from the

judges’ perspective, the CC 21 SF&F masquerade MC’s performance was OK, but
not great. He kept forgetting to announce the division in which an entry
appeared. This was quite annoying, because judges look at an entry quite
differently if it is in the Novice division than if it is in the Master
division. At one point, we sent Eileen up to the podium to ask the MC to
please announce the divisions. He started to do so but soon forgot our
request and relapsed.<

This was a flaw in the design of the MC form. My forms were word-ifyed
versions of Alix Jordan’s ASCII text forms. Greg didn’t have that problem
the next night in the Historical Masquerade (which used different forms).

For many things the forms worked out well. This wasn’t one of them.

If I’m crazy enough to do this again (or assist someone else doing this) I
will make major redesigns in the form layouts.

> From a personal perspective, I note that the MC forgot to introduce the

judges and would have not done so had we not prompted him from the table.
He also did not make the usual opening comments about “no flash
photography,” and so forth. Perhaps there may be less need for such
announcements at a CC than at an sf con, but it only takes one ignorant neo
with a camera and flash to cause a significant hazard for those on stage.
Since Costume-Cons seek to attract members who had not attended CCs before,
I urge that such announcements be a standard part of the instruction to the
MC for opening comments (together with introduction of the judges).<

All I can guess is that Greg got his notecards mixed up. We went over
everything before the show and he had note cards with everything on it.
Don’t know what actually happened for certain.

anyway, gotta get some sleep. Just got home.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 92 From: Sharon Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC21 Review – Part III

Some hotels are hostile to this weekend getting committed in advance
if it is also Valentine’s Day, and they anticipate getting some extra
holiday business from that.

Sharon

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, “Byron Connell” <bconnel1@n…> wrote
in part:

>
> Presidents’ Day Weekend is neither a traditional “family” holiday

nor a major religious holiday, so it does not have the disadvantage
of Easter/Passover. The major disadvantage is weather, but for much
of North America that holds true for the rest of February and March.
Albany has had snow in May!

>
> Byron

 

Group: runacc Message: 93 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Shuttle rates

My personal opinion is that if you publish the worst case price well
ahead of schedule, with a proviso that you’re “trying to work out a
group rate discount,” it will help to ease sticker shock for those
people who do think it’s excessive, and help them budget the extra
expense.

In general, the earlier the warning, the better the feedback. This
should be the case for any required cost. Some people may still be
unhappy, but at least they’ll know up front about the situation. And
this is just the sort of thing a PR is for.

Cheers,

Betsy

Charles Galway wrote:

>
> We had been getting prices quoted of about $26 one-way, with additional reductions for multiple passengers. While annoying, I considered this to be acceptable, IF the hotel, food, membership, air-fares were all at a reasonable rate. (Which we’re trying to do.) We plan to post current rates later, closer to one year out. (and maybe work out a group rate.)
> Charles CC-23

[snip]


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 94 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s
OK, forget what I said a while back to Sharon about reviving the “CC in Las
Vegas” bid.

We just had friends from Denver get back from a vacation/convention in
Vegas. Thanks to 9/11 and less people going to Vegas, they said the days of
cheap food and hotel rooms are over.

*sigh* It used to be a good idea…

Baptistown, anyone?

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 95 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s

I heard something fairly similar from someone else in just the past
month.

Unfortunate, too. I’ll bet the backstage tour opportunities alone would
be worth the extra expense.

Sigh.

Betsy
(who was really hoping to see the Cirque shows she won’t see any other
way.)

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> OK, forget what I said a while back to Sharon about reviving the “CC in Las
> Vegas” bid.
>
> We just had friends from Denver get back from a vacation/convention in
> Vegas. Thanks to 9/11 and less people going to Vegas, they said the days of
> cheap food and hotel rooms are over.
>
> *sigh* It used to be a good idea…
>
> Baptistown, anyone?
>
> –Karen


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 96 From: Charles Galway Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: Future CC’s
Interesting, perhaps, Las Vegas appears to be trying to put it’s SF con back into motion. I just sent out an email inquiry just this morning.

Charles (who went to SilverCon III some years ago)

—–Original Message—–
From: Ricky & Karen Dick <castleb@pulsenet.com>

OK, forget what I said a while back to Sharon about reviving the “CC in Las Vegas” bid.
<snip>

–Karen

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 97 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC Dates

In a message dated 5/6/2003 12:14:31 AM Central Daylight Time,
costumrs@radiks.net writes:

> I take it you didn’t have an Act of God clause in your contract?

Not to my knowledge. I wasn’t involved that high up in that convention.
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 98 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: CC23 and general questions (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review)

On Sunday, May 4, 2003, at 10:35 PM, Charles Galway wrote:

> I wondered if we should list paid members? It sounds like the answer
> is yes (unless they request we don’t).

Paid members should be listed in each PR. That’s the way WorldCon does
it, and it works nicely. I’m not so sure about putting that list on the
website, but I’m leaning towards it. Some folks will go to a con if
they see that friends they haven’t seen in ages are going.

> Working on the masquerade for CONduit, we very rarely get the stage we
> thought we designed. Partly our fault, and partly the hotel. (I have
> worked both on masquerade, and on hotel liason.) This should not be a
> problem for CC-23 since we are planning on using a theater.

This should be negotiated either in the contract or in a secondary
signed agreement with the hotel. At something like CONduit where the
stage isn’t a major focus of the con, it’s not as bad, but as we saw in
Chicago this isn’t an area that a CC can afford to not guarantee in
writing.

> What is “A LOT” of money for a shuttle fare? We have shuttle service
> to our hotel, not complimentary. We are aware that can be a bit of a
> problem, but noticed other CC’s were outside the major city (Chicago,
> Atlanta) The costs per person drop for multiple riders, but we are
> still working on how to try to coordinate this.

Airport shuttle fare in San Jose is around $16/person. We do it for
departures (for the guaranteed delivery time), and cab it back
afterwards for $20 for the two of us.

Chicago was in Skokie (which is nearer to O’Hare than many parts of
Chicago proper). Doesn’t count. Don’t know Atlanta geography well
enough to know how they’re affected.

I guess I’m a bit jaded on things. Travel expenses are travel expenses.
Be upfront. Tell people that they’re going to have to pay for shuttle
fare from the airport to the hotel. I factor in airline costs,
taxi/shuttle costs and shipping costs. If I want to go to the con, I’ll
figure out how to pay for it.

> The hotel costs are very scary for our CC, and I would be interested
> in learning more. We did have a choice of charging more per room, and
> getting a cut rate on convention space. We opted for cheap rooms, but
> boy, it makes the hotel cost intimidating. It could make a difference
> if there are lots of cheap rooms close by. It would not make sense to
> scare everyone away from the hotel, and then not make the room-count
> price-break. If no cheaper hotels a close by, then it is safer to let
> the room rates rise a bit.

Hotel negotiation is something we all have a lot to learn about. I’m
looking towards seeing Marty’s model contract (and if he hadn’t
mentioned it I was going to ask for some real and model contracts).

Remember, in different areas of the country, hotels negotiate in
different ways. In some cases, they want a single all-encompassing
contract. In other cases, they want only the dollars/space in the
contract and you have to get everything else in a secondary agreement
and get them to sign that.

> I joined the Chicago Yahoo chat list. I thought I could learn
> something by eaves-dropping. Whatever happened at Chicago, did not
> happen on the list. (CONduit has a chat-list, and it’s used quite a
> bit, but is not considered official. Which is not to say the things
> don’t get turned into policy anyway.)

Some things happened on-list. Some things didn’t.

For successful list-based committee work, you’ve got to set a few
ground rules:
1. Responsibility must be delegated clearly.
2. If you see a hole, take it to the con chair rather than just
assuming the responsibility.
3. If it’s not your area and you have a suggestion, take it off-list
first.
4. If negotiating with other departments off-list, results must be
posted on-list.
5. Status reports must be required each month, with a defined format.

I’m guilty of not doing #4 myself on one or two occasions. After
clearing the F&SF schedule with scheduling and the chairs, I should
have posted it to the committee list.

#5 gets back to that list of areas and responsibilites we talked about
at “Build a better CC.” Without such a list it’s difficult to determine
what’s missing in any status reports.


Andy Trembley, Bull-in-Drag
The Bovine Illuminati (It’s the Cows, Inc.)
http://www.bovil.com/
Moo!

 

Group: runacc Message: 99 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Re: CC23 and general questions (was Re: [runacc] CC21 Review)

Nice segue, Andy!

Betsy

Andrew Trembley wrote:

>
> #5 gets back to that list of areas and responsibilites we talked about
>
> at “Build a better CC.” Without such a list it’s difficult to
> determine
> what’s missing in any status reports.


Betsy R. Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist
Costume-ConNections (http://www.Costume-Con.org/)

 

Group: runacc Message: 100 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/6/2003
Subject: Outline from the White Board at CC21
Hi, folks!

I’m taking a quick break before starting on CC11. The following raw
outline is the data from the meeting at CC21. It’s really rough, and not
terribly clear what we were trying to accomplish other than to break up
the contents of the current outline into more manageable sections. The
main sections are:

General
Bid
Before
During
After

So…

I’m also including a text version of the current online outline. Anyone
care to take a shot at realigning the content based on our proposed
structure while I finish reformatting the rest of the site? That is, if
this is the way we should actually lay out the document. I think it’s a
dandy idea, but I’m open to suggestions.

That way, we can get started making all this very useful feedback work
with the final goal.

And by the way, while I’m thinking about it…While we’re in this
process, in all ways, I defer to Karen. I’m just the coordinator here.
Karen’s word is law.

Thanks!

Betsy

—-

From CC21:

General

Accountability
Organization Chart
ConStitution
Corporate Structure
Contact Information
Timeline
* Deadlines
Communication
* Committee
* Membership
Privacy
Budget Templates
Logistics
* Facilities
* Master Schedule
* People
* Spaces

Bid

Publications/Marketing/Publicity
Hotel
Locality
Administrative Services
* Budget
* Logistics
* Membership
* Treasury/Accounting

Before

Everyone

During

After

Masquerade/Competition Directors
Chair
Treasurer
Hotel

—-
And from the web site:

Introduction

The Genesis of Costume-Con

The Name

The Organization

The Costume-Con ConStitution

Corporate Structure
* Chair(s)
* Treasurer
* Other Departments/Staffing Positions
Managing the Staff
* Selection
* Replacement
* Contact Lists
Meetings
* Agendas
* Scheduling
* Minutes
* Timeline
Contact Information
E-Mailing Lists
Themes and Artwork
Operations/Logistics
Supplies
* The Floating Costume-Con Supply “Bin”
Security Considerations
Copies & Reproduction
Signage
Budget
Policies (“Code of Conduct”)
* Weapons
* Smoking
* Parties
* Personal Conduct

Conference Hospitality Suite

Supplies
Hours
Refrigeration
Video Availability (Masquerades)
Cooking/Hot Food
Corkage Requirements
Volunteers & Assistants
Sponsors

Membership

What a Membership Includes
Categories
* Attending
* Supporting
* One-Day
* Kid-in-Tow
* Student
* Volunteer
* Special Events Access
Prices
* Rates
* Increases (and scheduling)
Registration
* Pre-Reg
* Lost Souls
* Publishing the Roster
* At-Con
* Early Pick-up (Thursday Night)
* Badges
* Badge Numbers
* New Members
Member Packets
* Pocket Program
* Program Book
* Future Fashion Folio
* Whole Costumers’ Catalog
* Freebies
* City Information
* Restaurant/Amenities Guide

Competitions

Directors/Coordinators
Science Fiction/Fantasy Masquerade
Historical Masquerade
* Rules – ICG Guidelines (Link to ICG site)
Future Fashion Show
Future Fashion Folio
Doll Contest
Other Competitions
* Single Pattern Contest
* Hall Costume Awards
* Themed Social Costume Contests
* Single Clothing Item Contests (Bra, Codpiece, etc.)
* The $1.98 Contest
* Video Masquerades
Judges
Master of Ceremonies
Certificates
Awards
Gifts/Donations
Image Records
* Photography
* Videography
* Fan Photography
Greenroom
* Dens
* Repair Table
* Refreshments
Registration
* Injury Waivers
Technical Support
* The Stage
* Light/Sound Equipment
* Pipe & Drape
* Tech Rehearsals
* Rehersal Space

Program Items

Schedules
* Workshops
* Events
* Master Schedule (including everything!)
Panels/Workshops/Demos
* Identifying
* Populating
* Registration
Extracurricular Activities
AV Equipment

Dealers

Membership Rates
What a Membership Includes
Room Layout/Considerations
Promotion
Selection

Exhibits

Supplies
Acquisitions
Labels

Socials

Friday Night/Other
Flea Market
Music/Dance
Refreshments/Cash Bar
Dances (Regency or other)

City Considerations

Holiday hours
Restaurants/Eateries
* Hours
* Availability
* Location
Amenities
Sundries
Attractions
Competing Events
Information Desk/Concierge
Transportation (car, bus, train, plain, boat, etc.)
Directions

Hotel

Choosing a Hotel
Contracts
Set-up
Room Night Pick-up
Meeting Space Requirements
Hotel Map
Pool/Hot Tub
Parking
* Availability
* Fees
Transportation
* Shuttle to local Airports & Trains

Ribbons

Masquerade/Award
Identification

Advertising

Rates
Sponsors
* General
* Con Suite
Donors

Publicity/Promotions

Flyers
Web Sites
Giveaways (Memberships, prizes, etc.)
Press Releases
conference/Conference Tables
Other sources

Publications

Scheduling
Progress Reports
Program Book
Fashion Folio
Whole Costumers’ Catalogue
At-con Newsletter
Pocket Program

Site Selection

Ballot Printing & Distribution
Site Selection Fees
On-site Voting and Counting
Validating Members
Announcements
Bid Tables/Presentations

Volunteers

Miscellaneous

Sewing Room
“Logo” Giveaways
“What is Costume-Con” information for mundanes
Lost & Found
Child Care
Fundraising
* T-Shirts
* Raffles
Charity

Wrap-Up

The “Gripe Session”
Passing on Supplies
Settling the Hotel Bill
Final Receipts & Reimbursements
Committee Membership Refunds
Pass-through Funds
Closing the Books


Betsy Delaney
Costume-Con Archivist

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 1 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 1 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 1 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/24/2003
Subject: This is a new and improved test!
Group: runacc Message: 2 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/1/2003
Subject: CC21 trying to contact CC23
Group: runacc Message: 3 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 4 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 5 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 6 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 7 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 8 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/5/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 9 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/5/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 10 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 11 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 12 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 13 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
Group: runacc Message: 14 From: betsy Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Keeping on topic – a plea!
Group: runacc Message: 15 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 16 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 17 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 18 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 19 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 20 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 21 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 22 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 23 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 24 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 25 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 26 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 27 From: Kevin Roche Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 28 From: Christine Connell Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 29 From: Sharon Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 30 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 31 From: Marc Gordon Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 32 From: Katherine Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 33 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 34 From: Martin Gear Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 35 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 36 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 37 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI
Group: runacc Message: 38 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 39 From: Greg and Sallie Abba Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 40 From: Jennifer Kelley Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 41 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 42 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 43 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: It’s Monday!!!
Group: runacc Message: 44 From: axejudge Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 45 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 46 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/29/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 47 From: Charles Galway Date: 4/29/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Group: runacc Message: 48 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Costume-Con 21 Review – Part I
Group: runacc Message: 49 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: CC21 Review – Part II
Group: runacc Message: 50 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: CC21 Review – Part III

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 1 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 3/24/2003
Subject: This is a new and improved test!

Hi, folks!

I’ve just personally added the last five addresses to the list, and so
now we should be back in business again. If you really didn’t want to
subscribe, I apologize. If you want, I can deal with the unsub for you.

You’ll notice the link at the bottom of this message – that way, you
don’t need to remember where to find the document we’re developing.

Here’s what’s up with me….

I am going to be at CC21 – arriving on the 17th and leaving the 21st,
though the means of transit is now in question, as Dan’s office (the US
Army) has been told that all leave has been cancelled in light of the
war. I am not going to let this stop me from attending CC21, but it does
present some wrinkles.

Add to this the flood we had in our basement, and the need to completely
replace the carpet, and you will see that my time prior to the con is
exceptionally limited. So, please, if you suggest something to be added
to the document prior to the con, don’t be surprised if it takes until
May to get on the page.

If you want to call and talk about stuff before or after the con, you
can reach me from 9am to 9pm ET at 301.307.0222. You can also reach me
by cell at 301.922.1865, or by AIM at brdelaney63. Please send me email
and ask me to add you to my buddy list – I’ve gotten tired of offers to
see the latest web cam pix of Miss February.

Hopefully, this will be the last modification to the management of the
list.

Talk to you soon!

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large
WebInvent.com, Inc.

************************************************************************
mailto:WebInvent@WebInvent.com or visit http://www.WebInvent.com/
mailto:Costume-Con@Costume-Con.org or visit http://www.Costume-Con.org/
mailto:betsy@hawkeswood.com or visit http://www.hawkeswood.com/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 2 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/1/2003
Subject: CC21 trying to contact CC23
Hi!
I am trying to contact the chairs of CC23-Utah. I’d appreciate any
help that anyone can provide.
Thanks!Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21
<A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes You!</A>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 3 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Hi, folks!

This is a request. I submitted it once before, prior to moving to the
new list site, so I thought I’d send it once more just in case. I know
how much I have to do before CC21, since we’re leaving the 16th, so I’ll
completely understand if you can’t get to it before I leave, but I have
to ask anyway.

If you have anything specific you think we should cover during the
brainstorming session, please send it to me before I leave (preferably
before the 10th, but I’ll take what I can get).

I’m going to print out at least the outline of what we already have
online, and will also take copies of the Kennedy Compendium and
Masquerade Runner’s Handbook with me. I’m not going to print out the
WorldCon Runner’s Guide, since it’s really large.

And if you’re planning to attend the con, and you want to participate in
the session, it’s scheduled for the hour before the ICG Board meeting,
on Monday the 21st.

Thanks in advance for your input!

See you at CC21 (I hope!),

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 4 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Hey, Betsy –

I’m sorry I haven’t been more active in this group, but life continues to be
complicated. I definitly want to attend the brainstorming session. The
prospect of having all that incredible experience and talent to draw upon is
wonderful. I am sort of socking away all the suggestions and comments that
folks have been throwing out on the ICG site for future reference. Thanks
for starting this group.

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
>Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:51:13 -0500
>
>Hi, folks!
>
>This is a request. I submitted it once before, prior to moving to the
>new list site, so I thought I’d send it once more just in case. I know
>how much I have to do before CC21, since we’re leaving the 16th, so I’ll
>completely understand if you can’t get to it before I leave, but I have
>to ask anyway.
>
>If you have anything specific you think we should cover during the
>brainstorming session, please send it to me before I leave (preferably
>before the 10th, but I’ll take what I can get).
>
>I’m going to print out at least the outline of what we already have
>online, and will also take copies of the Kennedy Compendium and
>Masquerade Runner’s Handbook with me. I’m not going to print out the
>WorldCon Runner’s Guide, since it’s really large.
>
>And if you’re planning to attend the con, and you want to participate in
>the session, it’s scheduled for the hour before the ICG Board meeting,
>on Monday the 21st.
>
>Thanks in advance for your input!
>
>See you at CC21 (I hope!),
>
>Betsy
>
>–
>Betsy R. Delaney
>Web Mistress at large
>
>************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
>************************************************************************

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

Group: runacc Message: 5 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

I hope to be there, too.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Trudy Leonard
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Hey, Betsy –

I’m sorry I haven’t been more active in this group, but life continues to be
complicated. I definitly want to attend the brainstorming session. The
prospect of having all that incredible experience and talent to draw upon is
wonderful. I am sort of socking away all the suggestions and comments that
folks have been throwing out on the ICG site for future reference. Thanks
for starting this group.

Trudy

>From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [runacc] Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!
>Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:51:13 -0500
>
>Hi, folks!
>
>This is a request. I submitted it once before, prior to moving to the
>new list site, so I thought I’d send it once more just in case. I know
>how much I have to do before CC21, since we’re leaving the 16th, so I’ll
>completely understand if you can’t get to it before I leave, but I have
>to ask anyway.
>
>If you have anything specific you think we should cover during the
>brainstorming session, please send it to me before I leave (preferably
>before the 10th, but I’ll take what I can get).
>
>I’m going to print out at least the outline of what we already have
>online, and will also take copies of the Kennedy Compendium and
>Masquerade Runner’s Handbook with me. I’m not going to print out the
>WorldCon Runner’s Guide, since it’s really large.
>
>And if you’re planning to attend the con, and you want to participate in
>the session, it’s scheduled for the hour before the ICG Board meeting,
>on Monday the 21st.
>
>Thanks in advance for your input!
>
>See you at CC21 (I hope!),
>
>Betsy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 6 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 06:51 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:

> If you have anything specific you think we should cover during the
> brainstorming session, please send it to me before I leave (preferably
> before the 10th, but I’ll take what I can get).

 

Count me in. I may be there with a Martini (I may need one or two after
the weekend).

> I’m going to print out at least the outline of what we already have
> online, and will also take copies of the Kennedy Compendium and
> Masquerade Runner’s Handbook with me. I’m not going to print out the
> WorldCon Runner’s Guide, since it’s really large.

 

So for those of you who want to look at this before the con (Worldcon
Runners’ Guide) it’s online at
http://www.sflovers.org/wcrg/
It’s a good reality check.

andy


andy trembley, Bitchy Design Queen – http://www.bovil.com/
San Jose, CA – ’72 R75/5 ’86 R100 (mine) – ’92 K75sa ’03 R1150R
(Kevin’s)
“It’s not pink, it’s peach-colored. Pink is tacky.”
–Manfred Pfirsich Marie Rommel

2nd most important safety device on my bike: the one beneath my right
hand
Most important safety device on my bike: the one inside my helmet

 

Group: runacc Message: 7 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/4/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Sorry, Betsy, but I will be flying out early Mon. and will have to miss it.
Keep me posted, please.
Elaine

>

 

Group: runacc Message: 8 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/5/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

When I get home on the 22nd (or as soon as I can see straight after a
two day trip home with a toddler), I’ll post the notes from the session.

I’ll also have some work to do, getting the lists of participants and
award recipients up on the CC site, so I may be tied up for about a week
afterwards, which should give everyone some time to recover, but not
enough to forget….

😎

Thanks!

Betsy

Elaine Mami wrote:

>
> Sorry, Betsy, but I will be flying out early Mon. and will have to miss it.
> Keep me posted, please.
> Elaine

 


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 9 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/5/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Andy —

So long as it’s not a Martini-Henry.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:45 PM
Subject: [runacc] Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 06:51 AM, Betsy Delaney wrote:
> If you have anything specific you think we should cover during the
> brainstorming session, please send it to me before I leave (preferably
> before the 10th, but I’ll take what I can get).

Count me in. I may be there with a Martini (I may need one or two after
the weekend).

> I’m going to print out at least the outline of what we already have
> online, and will also take copies of the Kennedy Compendium and
> Masquerade Runner’s Handbook with me. I’m not going to print out the
> WorldCon Runner’s Guide, since it’s really large.

So for those of you who want to look at this before the con (Worldcon
Runners’ Guide) it’s online at
http://www.sflovers.org/wcrg/
It’s a good reality check.

andy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 10 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

At 08:51 AM 4/4/2003, you wrote:

I’ll be there, of course.

Pierre

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 11 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

We’d like to be there and will make an earnest effor to be so.

Nora & Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 12 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

In a message dated 4/5/2003 8:25:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

> So long as it’s not a Martini-Henry.

Actually, I prefer a Gibson!
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 13 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

Cocktail or Girl?

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Prep for CC21’s brainstorming session!

In a message dated 4/5/2003 8:25:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:
> So long as it’s not a Martini-Henry.
Actually, I prefer a Gibson!
Henry Osier

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 14 From: betsy Date: 4/6/2003
Subject: Keeping on topic – a plea!

Ok, folks:

While I appreciate humor as much as the next human being (well, maybe not the
*next* human being, but you know what I mean), this list’s purpose is to
discuss running a Costume-Con. With the high volume we could theoretically
generate by drifting off topic, I would prefer not to drift. I’m having a hard
enough time keeping up with ICG-D.

Please keep responses on target and on topic.

And please try to snip quoted material whenever possible, so that people don’t
reread entire messages where one sentence will do.

I’m sure everyone on the list will appreciate your consideration!

Cheers,

Betsy

btw: Thanks, Andy, for posting the link to the WorldCon Runner’s Guide! I
meant to do that myself, and will probably add a link to it to the footer
(below) later.

-b


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large
WebInvent.com, Inc.

************************************************************************
www.WebInvent.com * www.Costume-Con.org * www.hawkeswood.com
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 15 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: My AIM Account — FYI

Hi, folks!

There are now 21 members of this list.

Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.

My account is: brdelaney63

You will need to send yours so that I can add you to my buddy list. If
you want the whole list to know what it is, just reply to this message.
Otherwise, be sure to edit and send it only to me.

There’s a lot to discuss, particularly just post con. We’ll be starting
the discussion next Monday.

Enjoy the weekend!

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 16 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

What’s an AIM account? Whatever it is, I don’t have one.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: [runacc] My AIM Account — FYI

Hi, folks!

There are now 21 members of this list.

Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.

My account is: brdelaney63

You will need to send yours so that I can add you to my buddy list. If
you want the whole list to know what it is, just reply to this message.
Otherwise, be sure to edit and send it only to me.

There’s a lot to discuss, particularly just post con. We’ll be starting
the discussion next Monday.

Enjoy the weekend!

Cheers,

Betsy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 17 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

AOL Instant Messenger.

It’s kind of like an always-on chat room.

Some people like it. Some don’t.

It comes with a Netscape installation (and I swear by Netscape).

Having an AIM account is not required to participate in the group. And I
will be investigating the way the chat functions work on the Yahoogroups
site, which means we may be taking advantage of that alternative to
discuss things that need working out in realtime.

Cheers,

Betsy

Byron Connell wrote:

>
> What’s an AIM account? Whatever it is, I don’t have one.
>
> Byron

 


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 18 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

What’s an AIM account?
Elaine

Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall always be amused!

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney <betsy@hawkeswood.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: [runacc] My AIM Account — FYI

> Hi, folks!
>
> There are now 21 members of this list.
>
> Since our members are spread across the country, and since long distance
> bills are what they are, here’s my AIM account.
>
> My account is: brdelaney63
>
> You will need to send yours so that I can add you to my buddy list. If
> you want the whole list to know what it is, just reply to this message.
> Otherwise, be sure to edit and send it only to me.
>
> There’s a lot to discuss, particularly just post con. We’ll be starting
> the discussion next Monday.
>
> Enjoy the weekend!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Betsy
>
> —
> Betsy R. Delaney
> Web Mistress at large
>
> ************************************************************************
> http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
> http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
> http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
> ************************************************************************
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 19 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/25/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

I have IM, but not with AOL. I won’t use anything with AOL, because of the
many problems I’ve encountered with it. Mine is with MSN, and it works just
great.

Elaine

>

 

Group: runacc Message: 20 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Roll Call?

In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:

> There are now 21 members of this list

Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves again,
so that everyone knows who we are?
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21
<A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes You!</A>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 21 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

In a message dated 4/25/2003 7:32:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
bconnel1@nycap.rr.com writes:

>
> What’s an AIM account?

AOL Instant Messenger. It is a free download and accessory. I just don’t
remember what the web address is, but I have AIM, as well as CompuServe’s IM,
which is a close cousin.
HenryOsier (CS IM)
HenryWOsier (AIM)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 22 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

Don’t need AIM myself, since I’m not at home during the day. We do check the
mail twice a day, though.

Nora

> > What’s an AIM account?
> AOL Instant Messenger. It is a free download and accessory. I just don’t
> remember what the web address is, but I have AIM, as well as CompuServe’s

IM,

> which is a close cousin.
> HenryOsier (CS IM)
> HenryWOsier (AIM)

 

Group: runacc Message: 23 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Yes. I’m Byron Connell, Albany, NY.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: [runacc] Roll Call?

In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> There are now 21 members of this list
Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves again,
so that everyone knows who we are?
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 24 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Karen Dick. Costume-Con Founding Chairman and Service-Mark Holder. Have
worked on committee positions on so many CC’s (and other cons) that I’ve
lost count.Ricky Dick. Founding President of the Sick Pups chapter of the ICG. Has
worked committee positions on 5 CC’s.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 25 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Bruce Mai, SLCG President
and
Nora Mai, ICG VP
both on board

 

Group: runacc Message: 26 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Bruce and Nora Mai

Co-Chairs for Costume-Con 16 (Nora just did the Fashion Show for CC21).

—– Original Message —–
From: “Ricky & Karen Dick” <castleb@pulsenet.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Roll Call?

> Karen Dick. Costume-Con Founding Chairman and Service-Mark Holder. Have
> worked on committee positions on so many CC’s (and other cons) that I’ve
> lost count.
>
> Ricky Dick. Founding President of the Sick Pups chapter of the ICG. Has
> worked committee positions on 5 CC’s.
>
> –Karen
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 27 From: Kevin Roche Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Kevin Roche

co-chair of the CC26 in Silicon Valley bid
Chairman, “Iron Costumer” competition CC21
Director, CC12 “Dimensions in Design” showcase
presi… oooo! It’s all pretty and sparkly! 🙂

 

Group: runacc Message: 28 From: Christine Connell Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Tina Connell. Is mostly seen working as backstage Green Room repair table
staff at CCs, Worldcons & regionals. Does (maybe) one “real” costume every
10 years. Committee on CC7 and CC18. When not at a con, does carpentry and
gourmet cooking.

—– Original Message —–
From: <henryosier@cs.com>
To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: [runacc] Roll Call?

> In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
> betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> > There are now 21 members of this list
> Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves
again,
> so that everyone knows who we are?
> Henry W. Osier,
> Co-Chair, CC21
> <A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes
You!</A>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 29 From: Sharon Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Sharon Trembley …

been on a couple CC committees,
been to CCs,
want to see better CCs,
and would like CCs to take place in exciting locations with a wealth
of costume opportunities – because if they’re not, you might as well
just hold them all in New Jersey, and make my commute easier OR I’ll
just have to get together another bid for somewhere I’d like to
visit.

Sharon

 

Group: runacc Message: 30 From: Elaine Mami Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Probably not. I already know who I am, and find that scary enough, thank
you.

Elaine Mami
Once-and-future CC Con-Com and CC MD, Judge and MC

> > There are now 21 members of this list
> Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves

again,

> so that everyone knows who we are?
> Henry W. Osier,
> Co-Chair, CC21

 

Group: runacc Message: 31 From: Marc Gordon Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Marc Gordon

Technical director for CC18. Tech staff for CC17. Committee and tech
staff for CC15. Also work on a couple of other conventions (T.D. for
Balticon, Events Division Head for Noreascon 4).

-Marc


<edmond@radix.net>
After ecstasy, the laundry. — Zen koan

 

Group: runacc Message: 32 From: Katherine Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Katherine Bonham (formerly Jepson), Calgary, Alberta, co-chair CC-19, Canadian rep. CC-20.

—– Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: [runacc] Roll Call?

In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> There are now 21 members of this list
Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves again,
so that everyone knows who we are?
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21
<A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes You!</A>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 33 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Trudy Leonard, here. Co-chair of CC22. MD for several small local cons. MD
for the NorthAmeriCon that was held in Atlanta (where I learned a lot about
what SHOULDN’T be done). Our other chair is my daughter, Fiona Leonard,
long-time costumer.

>From: “Katherine” <kathnbiz@telusplanet.net>
>Reply-To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
>To: <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Roll Call?
>Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:12:59 -0600
>
>Katherine Bonham (formerly Jepson), Calgary, Alberta, co-chair CC-19,
>Canadian rep. CC-20.
> —– Original Message —–
> From: henryosier@cs.com
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 10:38 AM
> Subject: [runacc] Roll Call?
>
>
> In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
> betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> > There are now 21 members of this list
> Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves
>again,
> so that everyone knows who we are?
> Henry W. Osier,
> Co-Chair, CC21
> <A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes
>You!</A>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 

Group: runacc Message: 34 From: Martin Gear Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Marty Gear –
Founding member of the ICG, former President
Chair CC-3
Hotel Liaison – CC-9 & CC-15, and ten years of Balticons
Facilities Director – 1998 WorldCon
Masquerade Director – 1953 and 1992 WorldCons, Balticon Masquerade
Director/ M.C. since 1979
Masquerade M.C. – 1986, 1993, and 1998 WorldCons and a couple of Costume
Cons
Former member of CostumApa
Castle Blood Cast Member (“Uncle Vlad”)Is there anybody on the list who doesn’t know who all the other people
are?

^M^

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 35 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

At 09:45 PM 4/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Is there anybody on the list who doesn’t know who all the other people
>are?
>
>^M^

 

Marty, all we know about the list is approximately how many people are on
it. So unless Betsy is going to publish a list of who’s signed up, I think
the introductions are helpful.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 36 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

I did not realize that the roll call should include a mini-bio, so I just signed in —

Byron Connell. I enter in the novice division when I do compete. That’s about once every ten years. I’ll be in the Torcon masquerade (as a member of a group); I was last in the ConFrancisco masquerade. The time before that was LACon II.

On the other hand I have run the masquerade green rooms at CC7, 9, 11, 14, 16, and 19; the following worldcons: Noreason III, Conadian, LAcon III, Bucconeer, Chicon 2000, MilPhil, and Con Jose; and many Albacons, Arisias, and Lunacons. I was on site back stage/green room manager at CC 13. I was front-of-house manager for CC 8. I co-directed the CC 10 masquerade (with Tina) and directed the Arisia 2002 masquerade. I was a presentation judge at the CC 17 and 21 SF&F masquerades, the LoneStarCon 2 masquerade, Lunacon, and Philcon. I’ve been a staph member at several Boskones and Lunacons. I co-chaired two LASTcon science-fiction conventions. Tina and I attended SMOFcon I.

I have served as president of the Sick Pups. I helped write the ICG By-laws, Standing Rules, and Guidelines for International-Level Masquerades and Competitions. I was ICG Recording Secretary for two years and ICG President for three. I was honored in 1996 with the ICG’s Lifetime Achievement Award (before being elected President).

Byron

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 37 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: My AIM Account — FYI

Betsy Delaney said:

> My account is: brdelaney63

 

attrembl

not going to be available too much for the next few weeks…

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 38 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/27/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Andy Trembley

Most recently MD for the CC21 F/SF Masquerade and Workmanship Judge for
ConJose. Dabbler in midwest con-running before I moved to California.
Advisor (mostly ignored, to their detriment) to the Folsom Fringe BDSM
conference and past department head. Writer/editor of assorted marketing
and operational documents.

Currently Bid Chair of the CC26? in Silicon Valley bid.

Professionally a systems administrator, application developer, and support
technician.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 39 From: Greg and Sallie Abba Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Sallie Abba – Co-chair CC-24 in Des Moines. Currently VP of the Des Moines Science Fiction Society. Have been on the organizing committee of DemiCon, held various department positions, and assisted in revising the club by-laws. I’ve also helped organize and run regional and international youth events and adult learning conferences including inventing the registration process and accompanying paper work.

Professionally, I’m the training director for Girl Scouts of Moingona Council. I’m also a certified instructor of trainers.

I just got back from a conference in New York, so I’m a little late in signing in. I had a really great time in Chicago. It was nice to match some faces with names. I am looking forward to the dialog here and hope to put the information to good use at CC-24.

—– Original Message —–
From: henryosier@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 11:38 AM
Subject: [runacc] Roll Call?

In a message dated 4/25/2003 9:21:48 AM Central Daylight Time,
betsy@hawkeswood.com writes:
> There are now 21 members of this list
Question to all: Do you think that we should all reintroduce ourselves again,
so that everyone knows who we are?
Henry W. Osier,
Co-Chair, CC21
<A HREF=”http://www.jennifarse.com/cc2003″>Costume-Con 21 Welcomes You!</A>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 40 From: Jennifer Kelley Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Jennifer Adams Kelley

secretary, CC21 (including such diverse functions as publications, website,
Friday Social, and (unfortunately) hotel liason)

secretary, Chicagoland Costumers Guild

Masquerade Director for Visions for the entire 9 year run of the
convention, and for Chicago TARDIS 2000.

Masquerade Judge at Windycon (1998 and 2002) and Midwest Furfest (2000)

Winner of “Best Presentation” at Windycon in 1999

Winner of numerous “Best in Class” and “Best in Show” awards at various
Doctor Who conventions in the 1980’s.

Currently Programming and Publicity Chair for Chicago TARDIS 2003 (a
position held since the convention’s beginning in 2000)

 

Group: runacc Message: 41 From: henryosier@cs.com Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

In a message dated 4/27/2003 8:46:01 PM Central Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> Is there anybody on the list who doesn’t know who all the other people
> are?

Marty,
That reminds me to do this:

Henry W. Osier
Co-Masq. Director, Duckon 12 (http://www.duckon.org/)
Co-Chair, CC21
Member of Costume & Masquerade APA
Asst. Masq. Director, ChiCon 2000
Various duties, various conventions in Milwaukee, Chicago, and Madison, WI

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 42 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Betsy Delaney

Instigator/Moderator – This mailing list

Current:
Costume-Con Archivist/Web Mistress: Costume-ConNections
Editor: The ICG Newsletter
ICG Board rep: Sick Pups
Web Mistress: www.sickpups.org

Former:
President, Secretary, Treasurer: GCFCG, Inc.
Treasurer, Secretary (Corr. and Rec.): ICG, Inc.

Chair, Costume-Con Fifteen

I’ve been at this stuff one way or another since 1985 (my first
appearance on stage at Balticon 19).

Costume-Con 3 was my first CC. I’ve been a member of the ICG or a
chapter of same since then.

FYI – It is possible to see the email addresses, and some profiles, of
all the members of this list by visiting the Yahoo Groups site through
the link at the bottom of this message.

More in a separate message, shortly!

Cheers,

Betsy


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 43 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: It’s Monday!!!

Ok, folks.

As the roll call continues (I’ve added two more to the invite list, so I
expect there may be a few more over the next week).

I’m going to transcribe the notes I photographed from our session on
Monday last. Then, I’m going to go away for a little while, and spend
the rest of the time I need to spend on changing the site navigation for
Costume-ConNections. It’s been needed for months now, and I’m determined
to get it done before I start adding the data from CC21 on the site.

We’ve got some specific things we need to comment on in the existing
content of the online document. There are also a lot of holes that need
filling.

Finally, there are committee reps for upcoming cons, who probably have
questions that need to be answered.

I’m throwing the floor open for discussion on the topics above.

And please try to remember to stay on topic!

Cheers,

Your Moderator


Betsy R. Delaney
Web Mistress at large

************************************************************************
http://www.WebInvent.com/ * http://www.hawkeswood.com/
http://www.Costume-Con.org/ * http://www.sickpups.org/
http://www.SchoolWithoutWalls.org/
************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 44 From: axejudge Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Karen Heim

former treasurer, St. Louis Costumer’s Guild
co-producer of Future Fashion Folio, CC16, CC22 (send those designs in!)
MC, Future Fashion Show, CC21
right-hand person and general dogsbody to Con Chair, CC16 (who asked
me to join in the fun here because I have opinions and am not afraid
to express them)

 

Group: runacc Message: 45 From: Cliff and Eileen Date: 4/28/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

I’m Eileen Capes

I was co-chair of CC19 and also held various positions on that con including
Treasurer and Hotel liaison, as well as much of the non-media advertising
along with my husband Cliff, who was also Registrar.

I was also on the committee for several years of our local Calgary SF
convention, Con-Version. Over time I held just about every job on that
committee including Treasurer for two years and Chair in 1991. I was also
Treasurer for Banffcon ’95, a convention held very occasionally in Banff
Alberta with an entire out-of-town (and cross-border) concom.

I am a professional accountant, which is why I keep winding up in the
Treasurer seat for so many cons. I do believe that when done
conscientiously, the Treasurer can get to know more about what is going on
in every department than even the chair does.

 

Group: runacc Message: 46 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/29/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?

Pierre and Sandy Pettinger

Co-Chairs CC10
Future Fashion Show Director CC16
Program Director CC18
Future Fashion Show and Historical (filled in) CC19
ConJose Masquerade Directors
Future Fashion Design (nee Folio)Competition Directors CC21
Co-Chair CC24
Co-Chair CC25 Bid

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed To Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly–
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 47 From: Charles Galway Date: 4/29/2003
Subject: Re: Roll Call?
Hi All,
This is Charles Galway from the Utah CC-23.
Been a concom and trustee for numerous Utah SF cons. (CONduit 13, in a few weeks)
Involved in many performance productions, i.e. belly dance, small music concerts, small festivals, etc.
Been to many different cons (big, small, & two CCs.)Hi, Henry. Yes we are here.
Sorry everyone, we did not make it out this year for CC-21. Not enough time or $ to make it this spring.
Yes we are getting offers now for help for CC-23. And sure, we invite more offers.
(More later, we will be posting info on the website…)

Don’t reintroduce yourselves, we can just read it in the archive.

Glad to be here.

Charles

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 48 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: Costume-Con 21 Review – Part I
This was put together by Nora, myself and Karen Heim on our way back home
from CC. I usually wind up writing more than one version of it to fit the
space. Here, I’m going to break it up so the letter(s) are not so long.Keep in mind, these are our personal opinions. We are merely expressing
what WE believe were the strengths and weaknesses of the convention. And I’
m sure that there will be explanations for some things we had questions
about.

Having attended several CCs (and run one ourselves), we became concerned by
statements from some CC21 committee members to the effect that running a CC
would be no different than general SF cons they had organized locally.
While there are similarities, Costume-Con has some very different demands.
Given that CC committees often have members who cannot attend local
meetings, communication becomes paramount for things to run smoothly.

If there is one thing that seemed to stand out about this Costume-Con, it
was the communication gaps during the planning stages. There was both a
lack of communication between staff (or at least certain ones) and between
some staffers and people who bought memberships to CC21. The reasons for
delays often seemed to be a result of procrastination: either someone didn’t
have the answers, or the questions were forwarded to someone else who did
not respond in a timely manner. While I understand Life happens, there
should have been better
follow-up to make sure the questions were answered. Occasionally, inquiries
were directed to the website for answers, rather than just providing the
answer outrigtht. There were also gaps in communicating decisions made by
the committee in-town to the those who were out of town. More than once, we
only found out about some decisions months after the fact – or at the con.

Another major point of frustration was the inconsistancy of the Progress
Reports that were supposed to be sent to people who bought memberships.
Several SLCG members who pre-registered waited for up to a year to recelve
their PR #1, despite my inquiring 3 times on their behalf. The most
irritating response (after promises to look into the delays) was, “they can
download it from the CC21 website”. Where PRs are frequently the only
acknowledgement of receipt of payment, this was/is not acceptable. Most of
our people eventually got all their PRs, but only after several inquiries
over a year and a half.

The progress reports themselves were mostly redundant from one issue to the
next, merely repeating info from the previous issue. The last one should
have had an actual map showing the location of the hotel, with approaches
from several directions. Written directions were not adequate, in our view.

Stage size information was repeatedly asked for by many people, yet somehow
this couldn’t seem to be found out from the hotel until 2 weeks or so before
the con — after PR #3(?). And then, when the info was published on the
CC21 website, it turned out when we got there that the stage was smaller.
It was not clear to me whether this was the hotel’s fault or someone
neglected to actually investigate what kinds and sizes of stage risers the
hotel actually had.

Speaking of the website, while the info posted was mostly adequate,
navigation was difficult because some links were not clearly defined. For
instance, there was no direct link to the hotel info off the splash page.

The Venue

There apparently were still serious hotel negotiation problems less than a
year out from the con, evidenced by the Reservations department saying they
knew of no “Costume Con 21”, and thus would not quote a con block rate.
Combined with the problems with PR #1, the SLCG got so fed up at one point
that we reserved a block of rooms through a travel agency to get close to
the promised con rate. (I was personally in favor of it to deny the
convention some room nights.) We eventually cancelled them once the
blocking issue was resolved.

Arrival

Fortunately, actually being at CC21 proved to be considerably more pleasant
and less frustrating. The Doubletree was well-located, with plenty of food
and shopping within easy walking distance. Free parking was another plus.
The free chocolate chip cookie at check-in (delicious!) was a nice touch.
Housekeeping was very prompt and attentive. Check-out procedure was a
breeze. Closet space was decent, but the bathrooms were small. They had
decent showers, though.

Function space was adequate for the programming that was offered. We noted
that there were no water set-ups for the Friday Night Social, nor for the
panels throughout the weekend, however.

Thursday notes:

When we arrived, there was a large group of people (most of them SLUTs, as
it turned out) waiting in the lobby, who were under the impression they
should meet there for a field trip at 3:00 p.m. They waited for
approximately 90 minutes before someone called to find out where the guide
was. (At the very least, there appears to have been a miscommunication
about the time for meeting).

There was no indication of any accommodation for early arrivals to pick up
their membership packets. The Con Suite was not open, but apparently some
people got their packets late that evening. That was news to us.

Friday notes:

There was no start time for programming in the last PR. That would have
been useful to know what was to occur. Since registration didn’t open till
Noon (not in the PR either), it would have been helpful to set up a
large-size version of the pocket program on an easel to refer to until
people had a chance to pick up their membership packets. (Registration
should open before programming starts, by the way.)

Programming notes:

Though some people may disagree, 10:00 a.m. seems to be a good time to start
the days’ panels. It gives people time to get up, get dressed and have a
relatively leisurely breakfast. The panels themselves appeared to be well
thought-out and had knowledgeable speakers. It was good to see different
names, rather than the usual people tapped to speak. The panels were listed
in alphabetical order (it made finding them easier) but not all of them had
the speakers’ names associated with them. This became a problem in the
situations where there was a no-show – no one knew who was supposed to lead
the panel. But at least the cancellations were followed up to inform
attendees. It just had the appearance that there were an unusually high
number of cancellations on some of the more interesting-sounding topics.

Friday Night Social:

The Chicago Mob theme seemed to work pretty well. The party room on the top
of the hotel had a nice view, the big dance floor and the live band playing
era music was a nice touch.

The choice of hors d’oeuvres was slightly strange, with a lot of meats and
less than normal vegetable matter (carrots, celery — that sort of stuff).
Costume-Con 21 hall awards didn’t seem to get handed out until sometime
later in the evening, and we’re not sure that they were distributed any
other time during the weekend (that we could see).

Everyone appeared to have a pretty good time. The only minor complaints
were that there weren’t enough chairs for people to sit down.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 49 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: CC21 Review – Part II

Saturday Programming:

More interesting subjects. No complaints.

Fantasy & Science Fiction Masquerade:

The ballroom itself was a bit too small, and getting to seating on the other
side of the room from the entrance was difficult.

As for the masquerade, it was well-organized with good paperwork support,
including sign-ups for tech rehearsals. A big “thumbs-up” must be given to
Andy for making accommodations by actually scheduling more time for larger
and more difficult presentations. This helped tremendously in keeping
things from bogging down. Rehearsals did get about an hour behind
(partially due to hotel issues) but not one got short-shrifted. Bravo.

The Tech crew from the Moebius Theatre was pretty well-organized and very
co-operative. The MC was available during all of the rehearsal times (as he
should be) and was attentive to pronunciations. Several compliments were
heard about his performance.

Given the numbers of entrants (surely there should have been some warning
prior to the convention), the Green Room was way too small for this show.
It got very crowded. Check-in probably should have been just outside, rather
than half way into the room on one side. A large group placed in a den too
close to the door caused a traffic jam. Adding to the controlled chaos was
the Poloroid photographer, who was roaming the room rather than having a
fixed station where costumers could come to her. Strangely, there were no
mirrors in the room.

There were apparently not enough Den Moms (at least, at first) and they were
not given instructions to direct entrants to official photo, Workmanship
judging, etc. [Note: We know of 2 examples where volunteers for the con were
turned away for lack of info – apparently another communications gap
somewhere.]

The Workmaship judge was assigned an area that blocked the bathrooms. Also,
1 judge was not enough for the huge number of people that had to be
examined.

Finally, only the Best In Class and Best In Show winners received the etched
martini glasses; everyone else got calligraphed certificates – eventually.
There wasn’t anything to hand those winners at the time because the
certificates hadn’t been finished — even though there was supposedly (a)
calligrapher(s) on-site. Perhaps the same award for everyone except Best In
Show would have been a better plan.

Offical Photography:

The photographers were very good and thorough, providing instant
gratification with digital image feedback from the shots they took. Their
location wasn’t the best placed, but given the size of the foyer where they
had to work, just about any place would have caused a traffic problem.

While they had a limited number of photos you could buy almost immediately,
(one of the advantages of digital photography), they didn’t offer the more
popular 4x”6″ size pictures. Only 5″ x 7″ and 8″ x 10″ sizes were offered
for sale immediately. If you wanted the more popular 4″x 6″s, you had to
wait until they had them posted on a website. Prices were high: $20 for
two 5″x 7″s or one
8″ x 10″. (A single 4″ x 6″ print is $2.50. That’s the most expensive
price we’ve seen for a single print.)

Our single biggest beef was/is that there was no Folio collection of all the
costumes shot during the weekend at a reduced bulk rate. They offered a CD
of the collection, but you couldn’t print from it, which renders it pretty
much useless. This is a big irritation for those of us who like to archive
our artform and show them to others. We hope that some arrangement may
still be made to correct this glaring oversight.

Con Suite:

The Room was very nice and worked well. There could have been more
refrigerator space and a microwave, however (hotel wouldn’t allow it,
apparently). More regular chairs instead of the hybrid stool-types and more
tables would have been more useful, and the two billiard tables in the room
were just taking up space. The video room off the main suite was very
cool, although not big enough for everyone to watch the projection screen TV
at the same time.

Here’s some unsolicited advice: DON’T BUY THE CHEAP SODAS. People prefer
the name brands. The CC21 con suite quickly ran out of the most popular
flavors each day.

As for other supplies: Per e-mail exchanges, it was up to the various Con
Suite sponsors to provide most of the food. There was minimal, if any food
provided by CC21. Sponsors who didn’t have the wherewithall to buy large
amounts of snacks had to rely on leftovers from previous sponsors to fill in
any gaps beyond sodas.

(The SLCG deferred to exisiting cons for choosing when to sponsor the con
suite. When a final inquiry was made, we were assigned Saturday night,
rather than being given a choice of what was left.)

 

Group: runacc Message: 50 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/4/2003
Subject: CC21 Review – Part III

Sunday notes:

Easter weekend for a convention is a bad idea. Maybe it’s not a big deal
elsewhere, but in parts of the Midwest, it still is. This may’ve cost the
con some members. Passover should be taken into account for future
convention dates, also.

Future Fashion Show:

As near as we can tell, it ran smoothly with few glitches. We received no
complaints, anyway. A big “Thank you!” goes out to Nancy Mildebrandt for
relinquishing 30 minutes of her own tech rehearsal time to allow more
breathing space for us to run the show.

Historical Masquerade:

Probably because there were fewer entrants (which meant less crowding), this
was much more relaxed than the F & SF. Pre-judging on Saturday ran smoothly
and on time. Tech rehearsals even ran ahead of schedule briefly, if you can
believe it. How often does that happen? This said, there was no pre-masq
meeeting, which would’ve been good for asking questions, rather than people
having to hunt Nancy down. More advice: Make sure to have enough Poloroid
film for both masquerades.

The Historical was as well organized as the SF & F. Nancy had a good idea
in bringing a big clock into the Green Room so people could keep track of
the time. Still no mirrors, though. Also, 2 judges really isn’t a broad
enough opinion base for judging decisions, and the MD being one of those
judges is, in our opinion, a bad idea.

Once again, there were no awards handed out at the time, even though 2/3 of
the winners had already been selected prior to the masquerade (Best
Documentation, etc.). Only the presentation awards needed to be written up
on the spot. Why weren’t these calligraphed in time?

Iron Costumer notes:

It should have been its own event. And in our opinion announcing winners
during the “commercial breaks” greatly lessened and cheapened the importance
of the Historical Masquerade awards. Having the Iron Costumer event during
the while the judges made their decisions looked like a cheap trick to keep
people in the room.

There should have been an explanation of the show during set-up (unless I
missed it) for those of us who don’t watch the Food Network. Speaking of
set-up, this took way too long. Frankly, I thought there wasn’t enough
going on visually to hold people’s attention the entire time. This is why
the television show is edited. Visibility was poor because the teams were
not working on-stage

Suggestions for future cons who attempt this again: Explain what the Iron
Chef program is and what goes on. Put the teams up on stage, above the
audience. You need MCs/announcers who can really do entertaining “play by
play”. Have other distractions going on or add in things for the team
members to do that require flourishes of skill so that everyone isn’t just
hunched over the entire time. Work in some outrageous costume changes –
maybe on stage. There wasn’t really any explanation why Kevin kept changing
outfits every 15 minutes. Again, an added distraction for the audience.

Monday notes:

Just about the right amount of wrap up programming, followed by the business
meetings.

That’s about it. Ladies and gentlemen, you may now draw your brickbats.