Yahoo Archive: Page 60 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 60 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2954 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/3/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2955 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: New topic: “Are you going?”
Group: runacc Message: 2956 From: axejudge Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”
Group: runacc Message: 2957 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”
Group: runacc Message: 2958 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”
Group: runacc Message: 2959 From: Stacey Lee Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list
Group: runacc Message: 2960 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list
Group: runacc Message: 2961 From: Kevin Roche Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”
Group: runacc Message: 2962 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list
Group: runacc Message: 2963 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/28/2015
Subject: Re: membership list
Group: runacc Message: 2964 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/28/2015
Subject: Re: membership list
Group: runacc Message: 2965 From: grizzy1955 Date: 10/16/2015
Subject: BIDS FOR COSTUME-CON 37 NEEDED
Group: runacc Message: 2966 From: axejudge Date: 10/25/2015
Subject: SD CC
Group: runacc Message: 2967 From: beckieboo817 Date: 10/25/2015
Subject: Re: SD CC
Group: runacc Message: 2968 From: Kevin Roche Date: 10/26/2015
Subject: Re: SD CC
Group: runacc Message: 2969 From: ssbarsky Date: 11/17/2015
Subject: Re: BIDS FOR COSTUME-CON 37 NEEDED
Group: runacc Message: 2970 From: Byron Connell Date: 11/18/2015
Subject: New Member
Group: runacc Message: 2971 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 12/20/2015
Subject: Con Suite Food notes
Group: runacc Message: 2972 From: Byron Connell Date: 12/20/2015
Subject: Re: Con Suite Food notes
Group: runacc Message: 2973 From: beckieboo817 Date: 1/1/2016
Subject: Costume Con 36
Group: runacc Message: 2974 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 1/2/2016
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36
Group: runacc Message: 2975 From: beckieboo817 Date: 1/18/2016
Subject: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 2976 From: marg1066 Date: 1/19/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 2977 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 1/24/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 2978 From: Byron P Connell Date: 1/31/2016
Subject: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Running
Group: runacc Message: 2979 From: Sarah Bloy Date: 2/6/2016
Subject: Paging the CC36 Staff
Group: runacc Message: 2980 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/6/2016
Subject: Re: Paging the CC36 Staff
Group: runacc Message: 2981 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/7/2016
Subject: An interesting Fashion Show layout
Group: runacc Message: 2982 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/7/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout
Group: runacc Message: 2983 From: spiritof_76 Date: 2/8/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout
Group: runacc Message: 2984 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/9/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout
Group: runacc Message: 2985 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/9/2016
Subject: Re: Paging the CC36 Staff
Group: runacc Message: 2986 From: spiritof_76 Date: 2/10/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout
Group: runacc Message: 2987 From: Kaijugal . Date: 2/12/2016
Subject: Re: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Runn
Group: runacc Message: 2988 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/12/2016
Subject: Re: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Runn
Group: runacc Message: 2989 From: beckieboo817 Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2990 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2991 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2992 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2993 From: Kevin Roche Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2994 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2995 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2996 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2997 From: spiritof_76 Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2998 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 2999 From: marg1066 Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Group: runacc Message: 3000 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 3001 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 3002 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
Group: runacc Message: 3003 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2954 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/3/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Having different angles can be a good thing. Also, sometimes an entry slips through without being photographed. A good example was Kathy Sanders’ rendition of Nora’s Ribbon Dress for the CC11 FFS. She didn’t go through official photography, but fortunately, I got a very good shot of it.

I don’t know if there needs to be a separate folder for hall costumes or not, or if the CC Archives should stick to the events, but since the ICG Archives maintains its own records of CC activates (though we don’t repost the official pictures), we have folders for just such photos. It’s just as important to have a record of the non-competition outfits people wear, since it gives an insight into their “con garb”.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:05 PM
To: RunaCC
Subject: Re: [runacc] The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

I’ll look back through my past CC photos. I frequently take photos of the exhibits and doll competitions, and more recently, some of the quilts. If I’ve already submitted some, any duplicates I dig up and send can be ignored, of course. May take me a while, though. Up until just a few years ago, everything was film, not digital.

As many of you know, I particularly like to get close-ups of the neat little detail bits that most people never get to see. A lot of the photos I’ve got were ones in the Green Room or halls, since I seldom actually get to see the masquerade from the audience.

Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 2955 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: New topic: “Are you going?”

 

 

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports was a list of people who had bought memberships.   With each PR, they were updated with the latest list.   It was not only a good way to learn who was going, but also one way of determining if it was worth going to (judging by who you knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge of how successful the con might be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web page, or in this day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer wise?

Go!

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2956 From: axejudge Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”

I liked it a lot.  It did require, however, that:

a.  there actually WERE regular PRs; and

b.  someone took the lead to keep the list updated (this seems obvious, but you’d be surprised how difficult this information seems to be for some cons to put their finger on; this is the treasurer’s domain, but can lag behind)

Karen

 

 

On 2015-09-26 23:40, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:

 

 

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports was a list of people who had bought memberships.   With each PR, they were updated with the latest list.   It was not only a good way to learn who was going, but also one way of determining if it was worth going to (judging by who you knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge of how successful the con might be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web page, or in this day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer wise?

Go!

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2957 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 9/26/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”

 

It was also helpful for those of us who couldn’t remember whether we’d already gotten our memberships. 😘

Trudy
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

—- ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote —-

 

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports was a list of people who had bought memberships.   With each PR, they were updated with the latest list.   It was not only a good way to learn who was going, but also one way of
determining if it was worth going to (judging by who you knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge of how successful the con might be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web page, or in this day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer wise?

Go!

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2958 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”

Check out the roster section of http://www.sjin2018.org

It’s automatically fed from the reg database, and is opt-in with choice of listing real name or badge name.

 

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:01 PM Trudy Leonard georgialei@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It was also helpful for those of us who couldn’t remember whether we’d already gotten our memberships. 😘

Trudy
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

—- ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote —-

 

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports was a list of people who had bought memberships.   With each PR, they were updated with the latest list.   It was not only a good way to learn who was going, but also one way of
determining if it was worth going to (judging by who you knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge of how successful the con might be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web page, or in this day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer wise?

Go!

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2959 From: Stacey Lee Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list

I remember CC31 put it up on the website. We got together as a committee (I think it was even before our bid was certified) and agreed that 34 would NOT be doing that because of privacy concerns. Even if it was just a list of names, it’s too easy in the age of google and facebook to cross-reference that against people’s locations and put them at risk.

I suppose if the progress reports are only being privately emailed to registered members, then putting it in the prog report isn’t as big a risk. But then I have to ask…why? What’s the purpose of such a list? If you can’t remember if you registered, email the con (chair or head of registration) and ask. If it’s to rubberneck who else is going….well. Big deal. I can’t speak to others, of course, but for me, that’s useless info and I wouldn’t care. I’ll see people when I arrive at the con. I don’t have a burning need to know that ahead of time.

So I guess it comes down to: if it can be distributed safely via privately-emailed prog reports, then it’s up to the concom’s personal preference. I’m sure it wouldn’t take that much extra bandwidth, but it might take some poor secretary or registration head’s time to compile the list of names-only.

Stace
the poor secretary who might have to make that compilation.

——————————————–

On Sun, 9/27/15, runacc@yahoogroups.com <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
________________________________________________________________________
1a. New topic:  “Are you going?”
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” casamai@sbcglobal.net
casamai
Date: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:40 pm ((PDT))

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports
was a list of
people who had bought memberships.   With
each PR, they were updated with
the latest list.   It was not only a good way
to learn who was going, but
also one way of determining if it was worth going to
(judging by who you
knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge
of how successful the con might
be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web
page, or in this
day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer
wise?

 

Group: runacc Message: 2960 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list

Back in the dark ages, before Facebook was a thing, Costume-Con would often be the only time in a year we might see some of our friends, and it was nice to know who we’d be hanging out with.

I actually hate that in this day and age we have to worry about announcing to our friends we might be somewhere for fear that we might be taken advantage of at home.
I recognize also that I am a fossil and still prefer the paper to the electronic medium. With over 20,000 EMAIL messages (let alone the traffic on FB and elsewhere) I seldom open attachments or click through links unless I’ve asked for the material, because I’m not a fan of viruses or worms.
Honestly, I don’t remember the last time I read any of the electronic newsletters I’ve received. And that’s a sad thing.
I used to keep all the PRs when I received them, and I looked forward to getting those reminders that deadlines were coming up.
Yay, fewer dead trees. Boo, lost information and history.
Your mileage may vary.
Betsy

 

 

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stacey Lee staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I remember CC31 put it up on the website. We got together as a committee (I think it was even before our bid was certified) and agreed that 34 would NOT be doing that because of privacy concerns. Even if it was just a list of names, it’s too easy in the age of google and facebook to cross-reference that against people’s locations and put them at risk.

I suppose if the progress reports are only being privately emailed to registered members, then putting it in the prog report isn’t as big a risk. But then I have to ask…why? What’s the purpose of such a list? If you can’t remember if you registered, email the con (chair or head of registration) and ask. If it’s to rubberneck who else is going….well. Big deal. I can’t speak to others, of course, but for me, that’s useless info and I wouldn’t care. I’ll see people when I arrive at the con. I don’t have a burning need to know that ahead of time.

So I guess it comes down to: if it can be distributed safely via privately-emailed prog reports, then it’s up to the concom’s personal preference. I’m sure it wouldn’t take that much extra bandwidth, but it might take some poor secretary or registration head’s time to compile the list of names-only.

Stace
the poor secretary who might have to make that compilation.

——————————————–
On Sun, 9/27/15, runacc@yahoogroups.com <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
________________________________________________________________________
1a. New topic:  “Are you going?”
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” casamai@sbcglobal.net
casamai
Date: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:40 pm ((PDT))

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports
was a list of
people who had bought memberships.   With
each PR, they were updated with
the latest list.   It was not only a good way
to learn who was going, but
also one way of determining if it was worth going to
(judging by who you
knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge
of how successful the con might
be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web
page, or in this
day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer
wise?

————————————
Posted by: Stacey Lee <staceylee25@yahoo.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2961 From: Kevin Roche Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: New topic: “Are you going?”

I’m in favor of this technique (I should be, I wrote the code that generates it from the registration system.  🙂

The important part is the OPT-IN aspect. It also allows for the use of a fan name as opposed to legal name.
Kevin

 

On Sunday, September 27, 2015, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Check out the roster section of http://www.sjin2018.org

It’s automatically fed from the reg database, and is opt-in with choice of listing real name or badge name.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:01 PM Trudy Leonard georgialei@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It was also helpful for those of us who couldn’t remember whether we’d already gotten our memberships. 😘

Trudy
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

—- ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote —-

 

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports was a list of people who had bought memberships.   With each PR, they were updated with the latest list.   It was not only a good way to learn who was going, but also one way of
determining if it was worth going to (judging by who you knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge of how successful the con might be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web page, or in this day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer wise?

Go!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2962 From: Byron Connell Date: 9/27/2015
Subject: Re: membership list

 

As a fellow fossil, I too prefer paper over electrons.  To save postage, I normally print electronic PRs and save them.  I also agree that our society has reached yet another shameful place when an individual must fear letting others know about his or her itinerary.

 

I note that CC 33 kept a list of members on its web site.  However, I believe it was not fully up to date.  It also included both attending and supporting members, so the presence of a name did not assure that the individual would be at the con.  Sasquan did the same for all 10,000-odd attending and supporting members.  On a much smaller scale, so did Albacon 2014.5 (using badge names only).  MidAmeriCon II has a space on its web site for a members list; however, it has not populated it as of this afternoon.
Byron

 

 

On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Back in the dark ages, before Facebook was a thing, Costume-Con would often be the only time in a year we might see some of our friends, and it was nice to know who we’d be hanging out with.

I actually hate that in this day and age we have to worry about announcing to our friends we might be somewhere for fear that we might be taken advantage of at home.
I recognize also that I am a fossil and still prefer the paper to the electronic medium. With over 20,000 EMAIL messages (let alone the traffic on FB and elsewhere) I seldom open attachments or click through links unless I’ve asked for the material, because I’m not a fan of viruses or worms.
Honestly, I don’t remember the last time I read any of the electronic newsletters I’ve received. And that’s a sad thing.
I used to keep all the PRs when I received them, and I looked forward to getting those reminders that deadlines were coming up.
Yay, fewer dead trees. Boo, lost information and history.
Your mileage may vary.
Betsy

 

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stacey Lee staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I remember CC31 put it up on the website. We got together as a committee (I think it was even before our bid was certified) and agreed that 34 would NOT be doing that because of privacy concerns. Even if it was just a list of names, it’s too easy in the age of google and facebook to cross-reference that against people’s locations and put them at risk.

I suppose if the progress reports are only being privately emailed to registered members, then putting it in the prog report isn’t as big a risk. But then I have to ask…why? What’s the purpose of such a list? If you can’t remember if you registered, email the con (chair or head of registration) and ask. If it’s to rubberneck who else is going….well. Big deal. I can’t speak to others, of course, but for me, that’s useless info and I wouldn’t care. I’ll see people when I arrive at the con. I don’t have a burning need to know that ahead of time.

So I guess it comes down to: if it can be distributed safely via privately-emailed prog reports, then it’s up to the concom’s personal preference. I’m sure it wouldn’t take that much extra bandwidth, but it might take some poor secretary or registration head’s time to compile the list of names-only.

Stace
the poor secretary who might have to make that compilation.

——————————————–
On Sun, 9/27/15, runacc@yahoogroups.com <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 ________________________________________________________________________
 1a. New topic:  “Are you going?”
     Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” casamai@sbcglobal.net
 casamai
     Date: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:40 pm ((PDT))

 Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports
 was a list of
 people who had bought memberships.   With
 each PR, they were updated with
 the latest list.   It was not only a good way
 to learn who was going, but
 also one way of determining if it was worth going to
 (judging by who you
 knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge
 of how successful the con might
 be.



 Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web
 page, or in this
 day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer
 wise?




————————————
Posted by: Stacey Lee <staceylee25@yahoo.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
    runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2963 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 9/28/2015
Subject: Re: membership list

Well…

The regulars go, regardless of who else is going.

But if I was a random fan, and CC was, say, 100 miles away from me, and I didn’t know much about it, knowing I might see some (or many) local/regional friends there might be enough to get me to decide to sign up.

That’s he marketing rationale.

 

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:07 PM Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

As a fellow fossil, I too prefer paper over electrons.  To save postage, I normally print electronic PRs and save them.  I also agree that our society has reached yet another shameful place when an individual must fear letting others know about his or her itinerary.

I note that CC 33 kept a list of members on its web site.  However, I believe it was not fully up to date.  It also included both attending and supporting members, so the presence of a name did not assure that the individual would be at the con.  Sasquan did the same for all 10,000-odd attending and supporting members.  On a much smaller scale, so did Albacon 2014.5 (using badge names only).  MidAmeriCon II has a space on its web site for a members list; however, it has not populated it as of this afternoon.
Byron

 

On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Back in the dark ages, before Facebook was a thing, Costume-Con would often be the only time in a year we might see some of our friends, and it was nice to know who we’d be hanging out with.

I actually hate that in this day and age we have to worry about announcing to our friends we might be somewhere for fear that we might be taken advantage of at home.
I recognize also that I am a fossil and still prefer the paper to the electronic medium. With over 20,000 EMAIL messages (let alone the traffic on FB and elsewhere) I seldom open attachments or click through links unless I’ve asked for the material, because I’m not a fan of viruses or worms.
Honestly, I don’t remember the last time I read any of the electronic newsletters I’ve received. And that’s a sad thing.
I used to keep all the PRs when I received them, and I looked forward to getting those reminders that deadlines were coming up.
Yay, fewer dead trees. Boo, lost information and history.
Your mileage may vary.
Betsy

 

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stacey Lee staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I remember CC31 put it up on the website. We got together as a committee (I think it was even before our bid was certified) and agreed that 34 would NOT be doing that because of privacy concerns. Even if it was just a list of names, it’s too easy in the age of google and facebook to cross-reference that against people’s locations and put them at risk.

I suppose if the progress reports are only being privately emailed to registered members, then putting it in the prog report isn’t as big a risk. But then I have to ask…why? What’s the purpose of such a list? If you can’t remember if you registered, email the con (chair or head of registration) and ask. If it’s to rubberneck who else is going….well. Big deal. I can’t speak to others, of course, but for me, that’s useless info and I wouldn’t care. I’ll see people when I arrive at the con. I don’t have a burning need to know that ahead of time.

So I guess it comes down to: if it can be distributed safely via privately-emailed prog reports, then it’s up to the concom’s personal preference. I’m sure it wouldn’t take that much extra bandwidth, but it might take some poor secretary or registration head’s time to compile the list of names-only.

Stace
the poor secretary who might have to make that compilation.

——————————————–
On Sun, 9/27/15, runacc@yahoogroups.com <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 ________________________________________________________________________
 1a. New topic:  “Are you going?”
     Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” casamai@sbcglobal.net
 casamai
     Date: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:40 pm ((PDT))

 Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports
 was a list of
 people who had bought memberships.   With
 each PR, they were updated with
 the latest list.   It was not only a good way
 to learn who was going, but
 also one way of determining if it was worth going to
 (judging by who you
 knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge
 of how successful the con might
 be.



 Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web
 page, or in this
 day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer
 wise?




————————————
Posted by: Stacey Lee <staceylee25@yahoo.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
    runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2964 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 9/28/2015
Subject: Re: membership list

If you were searching for roommates or folks to include in a presentation,
such a list would be helpful.

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 12:00 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] membership list

I remember CC31 put it up on the website. We got together as a committee (I
think it was even before our bid was certified) and agreed that 34 would NOT
be doing that because of privacy concerns. Even if it was just a list of
names, it’s too easy in the age of google and facebook to cross-reference
that against people’s locations and put them at risk.

I suppose if the progress reports are only being privately emailed to
registered members, then putting it in the prog report isn’t as big a risk.
But then I have to ask…why? What’s the purpose of such a list? If you
can’t remember if you registered, email the con (chair or head of
registration) and ask. If it’s to rubberneck who else is going….well. Big
deal. I can’t speak to others, of course, but for me, that’s useless info
and I wouldn’t care. I’ll see people when I arrive at the con. I don’t have
a burning need to know that ahead of time.

So I guess it comes down to: if it can be distributed safely via
privately-emailed prog reports, then it’s up to the concom’s personal
preference. I’m sure it wouldn’t take that much extra bandwidth, but it
might take some poor secretary or registration head’s time to compile the
list of names-only.

Stace
the poor secretary who might have to make that compilation.

——————————————–

On Sun, 9/27/15, runacc@yahoogroups.com <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
________________________________________________________________________
1a. New topic:  “Are you going?”
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” casamai@sbcglobal.net
casamai
Date: Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:40 pm ((PDT))

Many moons ago, a feature in the back of progress reports
was a list of
people who had bought memberships.   With
each PR, they were updated with
the latest list.   It was not only a good way
to learn who was going, but
also one way of determining if it was worth going to
(judging by who you
knew on the list)   It could also be a gauge
of how successful the con might
be.

Would this be a good idea to bring back in a PR or a web
page, or in this
day of the internet and privacy concerns, is this no longer
wise?

————————————
Posted by: Stacey Lee <staceylee25@yahoo.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2965 From: grizzy1955 Date: 10/16/2015
Subject: BIDS FOR COSTUME-CON 37 NEEDED

 

Cross-posting…I know y’all have put in years of service already, but please help me shake the trees for 2019…

LOOKING FOR BIDS FOR COSTUME-CON 37. (Site selection to be voted upon at Costume-Con 34 in May 2016.)

Bidding for Costume-Con 37 is open through November 17, 2015 (180 days prior to Costume-Con 34). So far, I have not received proposed bids from any potential committees.

I have received proposals for bids for Costume-Con 38 and 39 in 2020 and 2021, but we need a Costume-Con in 2019 first.

Seated committees are:
Costume-Con 34 (2016) – Madison, WI
Costume-Con 35 (2017) – Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Costume-Con 36 (2018) – San Diego, CA

I would love to see a bid come out of the Northeast or Northwest (I’m looking at YOU, Boston and Seattle!), but I would be happy with ANY bid at this point.

Please discuss amongst yourselves, and share this post to appropriate groups.

For info on how to bid for a Costume-Con, go here:
http://www.costume-con.org/constitution.shtml

Thanks!

–Karen Schnaubelt

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2966 From: axejudge Date: 10/25/2015
Subject: SD CC

Are there members of the San Diego concom on the list?

 

I have had inquiries about finding information about the con (dates, etc.), but was told there wasn’t an easily accessible web presence (website, something on either Costume-Con site).

 

Now that it’s an official upcoming CC, these things should be put in place.  If they are, and my friend just didn’t have good Google-fu, please post the sites here.

 

Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 2967 From: beckieboo817 Date: 10/25/2015
Subject: Re: SD CC

I just googled and it comes up, not at the top of the page but it does come up. It’s just that at the moment, it’s giving a database error and I’m trying to figure out why this error keeps coming up and what we can do to keep it from happening.  It’s been up since around the 4th of July.

We also have a facebook page and if I remember correctly, it also has a link that people can buy their memberships.
cc36sandiego.org
 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2968 From: Kevin Roche Date: 10/26/2015
Subject: Re: SD CC

Hi Becky, I went to your admin login page (cc36sandiego.org/wp-admin) and the error message there explains a bit more:

Error establishing a database connection

This either means that the username and password information in your wp-config.php file is incorrect or we can’t contact the database server at localhost. This could mean your host’s database server is down.

  • Are you sure you have the correct username and password?
  • Are you sure that you have typed the correct hostname?
  • Are you sure that the database server is running?

If you’re unsure what these terms mean you should probably contact your host. If you still need help you can always visit the WordPress Support Forums.

 

 

Kevin

 

On Sunday, October 25, 2015, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I just googled and it comes up, not at the top of the page but it does come up. It’s just that at the moment, it’s giving a database error and I’m trying to figure out why this error keeps coming up and what we can do to keep it from happening.  It’s been up since around the 4th of July.

We also have a facebook page and if I remember correctly, it also has a link that people can buy their memberships.
cc36sandiego.org
 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2969 From: ssbarsky Date: 11/17/2015
Subject: Re: BIDS FOR COSTUME-CON 37 NEEDED
Hi everyone, I just joined this group.

Aurora Celeste and I are working with MCFI, NoEl, TF, and other interested people in bidding a Costume-Con for 2019.

If anyone can provide useful facilities information, i.e. room block sizes, function space, etc., that would be very useful.

Thanks in advance.

Sharon Sbarsky

 

Group: runacc Message: 2970 From: Byron Connell Date: 11/18/2015
Subject: New Member
Sharon Sbarsky, welcome to the group.

Byron

 

Group: runacc Message: 2971 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 12/20/2015
Subject: Con Suite Food notes

 

 

A note for future CC Con Suite folks.

Over the years, we’ve seen some really good ones, where you could pretty much skip going to the hotel restaurant, and there have been some disappointing ones where it’s the same stuff no matter what time of day.  Obviously, it really depends on the con budget and the imagination of the staff, but here are a few thoughts that will make a better experience.   Add your own thoughts to the thread.

Unless you have a deal where you can return stuff purchased, stick to name-brand soft drinks.   People prefer what they’re familiar with.

Local brand snacks are okay, but again, may not be eaten as much as what is familiar.

Consider providing more protein – con suites often have too many carbohydrates.   Simple summer sausage and cheese plates are good.  That said, simple bread and butter goes over REALLY well, especially if it’s “fresh” baked, rather than from the grocery store.   Or even stuff for making a  simple sandwich is also a good choice.

Keep in mind you can’t, and shouldn’t, cater to everyone’s dietary needs.

Planning and organization is key.   If the con suite staff decides to prepare a breakfast instead of having the hotel provide it, make sure the staff is in the suite early enough to have the breakfast ready when the room opens.   Early people get cranky if they’re made to wait.

I had one other thought, but for the life of me, I couldn’t remember what it was – I’ve had this sitting in “Draft” for a few weeks, so I give up.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2972 From: Byron Connell Date: 12/20/2015
Subject: Re: Con Suite Food notes

 

All good suggestions.  However, the first thing to do is read the contract with your venue to see what limitation it places on your ability to stock the con suite.  Does it require that you exclusively use the venue’s catering department in all function spaces?

 

Assuming your contract does not prevent you from doing so, try to get as many sponsors for the con suite as you can, including bids for future CCs, clubs (both ICG chapters and SF/Fantasy clubs have done so), and other related organizations.  They may bring a distinctive local/regional air to the con suite they sponsor.  (Who can forget fried ravs?)  However, if you push the cost of sponsorship too high you may scare off some potential sponsors.  (The Pups decided the cost of sponsorship at CC 33 was more than we could afford.)
Byron

 

 

On Dec 20, 2015, at 10:41 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

A note for future CC Con Suite folks.

Over the years, we’ve seen some really good ones, where you could pretty much skip going to the hotel restaurant, and there have been some disappointing ones where it’s the same stuff no matter what time of day.  Obviously, it really depends on the con budget and the imagination of the staff, but here are a few thoughts that will make a better experience.   Add your own thoughts to the thread.

Unless you have a deal where you can return stuff purchased, stick to name-brand soft drinks.   People prefer what they’re familiar with.  

Local brand snacks are okay, but again, may not be eaten as much as what is familiar.

Consider providing more protein – con suites often have too many carbohydrates.   Simple summer sausage and cheese plates are good.  That said, simple bread and butter goes over REALLY well, especially if it’s “fresh” baked, rather than from the grocery store.   Or even stuff for making a  simple sandwich is also a good choice.

Keep in mind you can’t, and shouldn’t, cater to everyone’s dietary needs.

Planning and organization is key.   If the con suite staff decides to prepare a breakfast instead of having the hotel provide it, make sure the staff is in the suite early enough to have the breakfast ready when the room opens.   Early people get cranky if they’re made to wait.

I had one other thought, but for the life of me, I couldn’t remember what it was – I’ve had this sitting in “Draft” for a few weeks, so I give up.

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2973 From: beckieboo817 Date: 1/1/2016
Subject: Costume Con 36

Hi, everyone and Happy New Year…

 

I would like to get some of my staff and upper management on to this group….How do I go about doing that?

 

Group: runacc Message: 2974 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 1/2/2016
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36

Shoot me their email addresses.

I think Karen is also admin.

Thanks!

Betsy

 

On Jan 1, 2016 8:48 PM, “beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, everyone and Happy New Year…

 

I would like to get some of my staff and upper management on to this group….How do I go about doing that?

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2975 From: beckieboo817 Date: 1/18/2016
Subject: Attendance and room counts

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2976 From: marg1066 Date: 1/19/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts

Any more numbers or details that I can give you, please let me know! Happy to help.

-Marg in Phoenix (CC30)

 

Group: runacc Message: 2977 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 1/24/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts

 

 

I could probably dig up figures for CC25, but they’re probably a little too out of date.  However, I can tell you that the region where you’re holding your Cc and whether there has been one there in the past will have a bearing on said numbers.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 9:03 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Attendance and room counts

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2978 From: Byron P Connell Date: 1/31/2016
Subject: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Running
I’m looking for persons interested in being part of an International Costumers’ Guild Special Interest Group for those of us involved in organizing, directing, and/or providing support for masquerades or similar stage costume competitions on the local, regional, and international-competition levels. The SIG would provide a forum for discussion of ways to run masquerades, improve them, introduce and consider new ideas or approaches, and so forth. Any ICG member interested in the topic would be welcome, especially those who are part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, as would both novice and experienced masquerade directors, MCs, tech directors and staff, stage ninjas, green room staff, masquerade judges, and interested masquerade participants or audience members. (After all, we want to know what our audience want and how to improve their experience.) Activity likely would be mostly electronic, although face-to-face events at cons and other venues certainly would be possible.

For myself, I’m a member of three ICG chapters: the Armed Costumers’ Guild, the Sick Pups, and the SLUTs, and have run too many masquerade green rooms to count, as well as directed two worldcon masquerades (Anticipation and Chicon V) and masquerades at Arisia, Philcon, and Albacon, and two SF masquerades and three historical masquerades at Costume-Cons.

To start the SIG, I need five ICG members in addition to myself to serve as our charter members. If you’d like to take part in this, please get back to me with your name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and ICG chapter. If you’re part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, please say so.

If I get five charter members, I’ll draft an application for ICG recognition and share the draft with them for review before we submit it.

Byron Connell
50 Dove Street, Albany, NY 12210-1811
New Jersey/New York Costumers’ Guild

 

Group: runacc Message: 2979 From: Sarah Bloy Date: 2/6/2016
Subject: Paging the CC36 Staff
Greetings, all!

I’m trying to get a hold of the staff for Costume Con 34.  It seems the form on their website doesn’t actually lead anywhere.

Can anyone give me a direct email?  CC34 has questions and stuff and things.

Sarah Bloy

CC34 Chair

 

Group: runacc Message: 2980 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/6/2016
Subject: Re: Paging the CC36 Staff

 

Rebecca Rowan is chair of CC 36. She’s at rebecca8175@gmail.com.

 

Elaine Mami is vice-chair. She’s at ecmami@hotmail.com.
Byron

 

 

On Feb 6, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Greetings, all!

I’m trying to get a hold of the staff for Costume Con 34.  It seems the form on their website doesn’t actually lead anywhere.

Can anyone give me a direct email?  CC34 has questions and stuff and things.

Sarah Bloy

CC34 Chair

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2981 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/7/2016
Subject: An interesting Fashion Show layout

 

 

Something some committee might like to explore for a  FFS sometime?  Only problem could be lighting, but I’ve seen worse.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2982 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/7/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout

 

Interesting format.  It has possibilities, I think. (Unlike some of the fashions on display.)

 

Byron

 

 

On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:17 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Something some committee might like to explore for a  FFS sometime?  Only problem could be lighting, but I’ve seen worse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=praegJ_sFmE

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2983 From: spiritof_76 Date: 2/8/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout

That would push it more toward fashion show than masquerade, but only
the people in the front row will see anything below the waist.

Michael

On 2016-02-07 11:17, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
wrote:

> Something some committee might like to explore for a FFS sometime?
> Only problem could be lighting, but I’ve seen worse.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=praegJ_sFmE
>
> Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2984 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/9/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout

Um, that’s why it’s called the Future FASHION Show?

It appears that no one was more than a row or two away. Risers could be used, if there were enough of them.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 9:02 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] An interesting Fashion Show layout

That would push it more toward fashion show than masquerade, but only the people in the front row will see anything below the waist.

Michael

On 2016-02-07 11:17, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
wrote:

> Something some committee might like to explore for a FFS sometime?
> Only problem could be lighting, but I’ve seen worse.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=praegJ_sFmE
>
> Bruce

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2985 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 2/9/2016
Subject: Re: Paging the CC36 Staff

 

 

I assume that’s “CC36” in a CC34 kind of way?   🙂

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 2:31 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Paging the CC36 Staff

Greetings, all!

I’m trying to get a hold of the staff for Costume Con 34.  It seems the form on their website doesn’t actually lead anywhere.

Can anyone give me a direct email?  CC34 has questions and stuff and things.

Sarah Bloy

CC34 Chair

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2986 From: spiritof_76 Date: 2/10/2016
Subject: Re: An interesting Fashion Show layout

I agree. I think it should be more fashion show and less masquerade.

Michael

On 2016-02-09 20:12, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
wrote:

> Um, that’s why it’s called the Future FASHION Show?
>
> It appears that no one was more than a row or two away. Risers could
> be used, if there were enough of them.
>
> Bruce
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 9:02 PM
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [runacc] An interesting Fashion Show layout
>
> That would push it more toward fashion show than masquerade, but only
> the people in the front row will see anything below the waist.
>
> Michael
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 2987 From: Kaijugal . Date: 2/12/2016
Subject: Re: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Runn

 

Wow Byron. That’s an AMAZING idea. I love it.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


CC: byronpconnell@gmail.com
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com; sick-pups@yahoogroups.com; SLCG-X@yahoogroups.com; ArmedCostumers@yahoogroups.com; runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:46:11 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Running

 

I’m looking for persons interested in being part of an International Costumers’ Guild Special Interest Group for those of us involved in organizing, directing, and/or providing support for masquerades or similar stage costume competitions on the local, regional, and international-competition levels. The SIG would provide a forum for discussion of ways to run masquerades, improve them, introduce and consider new ideas or approaches, and so forth. Any ICG member interested in the topic would be welcome, especially those who are part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, as would both novice and experienced masquerade directors, MCs, tech directors and staff, stage ninjas, green room staff, masquerade judges, and interested masquerade participants or audience members. (After all, we want to know what our audience want and how to improve their experience.) Activity likely would be mostly electronic, although face-to-face events at cons and other venues certainly would be possible.

For myself, I’m a member of three ICG chapters: the Armed Costumers’ Guild, the Sick Pups, and the SLUTs, and have run too many masquerade green rooms to count, as well as directed two worldcon masquerades (Anticipation and Chicon V) and masquerades at Arisia, Philcon, and Albacon, and two SF masquerades and three historical masquerades at Costume-Cons.

To start the SIG, I need five ICG members in addition to myself to serve as our charter members. If you’d like to take part in this, please get back to me with your name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and ICG chapter. If you’re part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, please say so.

If I get five charter members, I’ll draft an application for ICG recognition and share the draft with them for review before we submit it.

Byron Connell
50 Dove Street, Albany, NY 12210-1811
New Jersey/New York Costumers’ Guild

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2988 From: Byron Connell Date: 2/12/2016
Subject: Re: Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Runn

 

I’ll add you to the list of charter members.

 

Byron

 

 

On Feb 12, 2016, at 2:27 AM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Wow Byron. That’s an AMAZING idea. I love it.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada




CC: byronpconnell@gmail.com
To: ICG-D@yahoogroups.com; sick-pups@yahoogroups.com; SLCG-X@yahoogroups.com; ArmedCostumers@yahoogroups.com; runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:46:11 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Proposal for a New ICG Special Interest Group on Masquerade Running

 

I’m looking for persons interested in being part of an International Costumers’ Guild Special Interest Group for those of us involved in organizing, directing, and/or providing support for masquerades or similar stage costume competitions on the local, regional, and international-competition levels. The SIG would provide a forum for discussion of ways to run masquerades, improve them, introduce and consider new ideas or approaches, and so forth. Any ICG member interested in the topic would be welcome, especially those who are part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, as would both novice and experienced masquerade directors, MCs, tech directors and staff, stage ninjas, green room staff, masquerade judges, and interested masquerade participants or audience members. (After all, we want to know what our audience want and how to improve their experience.) Activity likely would be mostly electronic, although face-to-face events at cons and other venues certainly would be possible. 

For myself, I’m a member of three ICG chapters: the Armed Costumers’ Guild, the Sick Pups, and the SLUTs, and have run too many masquerade green rooms to count, as well as directed two worldcon masquerades (Anticipation and Chicon V) and masquerades at Arisia, Philcon, and Albacon, and two SF masquerades and three historical masquerades at Costume-Cons. 

To start the SIG, I need five ICG members in addition to myself to serve as our charter members. If you’d like to take part in this, please get back to me with your name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and ICG chapter. If you’re part of the RunaCC Yahoo group, please say so.

If I get five charter members, I’ll draft an application for ICG recognition and share the draft with them for review before we submit it. 

Byron Connell
50 Dove Street, Albany, NY 12210-1811
New Jersey/New York Costumers’ Guild  

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2989 From: beckieboo817 Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Size of main event room

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?
I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2990 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.
How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?
How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?
Betsy

 

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?
I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2991 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

 

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

 

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.
How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?
How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?
Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?
I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2992 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

Ask Kevin how big their main room was – I’d guess his numbers would align with yours best.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:52 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.

How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?

How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?

Betsy

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….

What was the size of your main event room? 7,000? 8,000? 9,000?

I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet. Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2993 From: Kevin Roche Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

My 3d models are still available in the Google Sketchup 3d world!

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/collection.html?id=50f5306ccaab25a2fbf563775e4f7513

The Doubletree had two ballrooms with the same dimensions (but the lower floor had columns), so I modeled both for different uses.

Overall dimensions were approximately 71×142=10000 sq.ft. across four equal bays; we split one off for the green room and did a wide house design for the main stage, and used that all weekend. We used part of the lower ballroom for the fashion show, and part for the dealers room. All the models are in the collection.

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model.html?id=3eae15a409ccc3f139ab9a829112caca

Kevin

Kevin

 

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:31 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ask Kevin how big their main room was – I’d guess his numbers would align with yours best.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:52 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.

How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?

How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?

Betsy

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….

What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?

I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2994 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

 

Part of that sq footage will be used for green room & tech, but it’s plenty big enough.  As Betsy said, a huge percentage of the members won’t be sitting in those seats.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:51:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

 

 

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.
How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?
How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?
Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?
I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2995 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

 

Part of that space will be used for green room & tech.  And, as Betsy said, a large number of those members won’t be using those seats anyway.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:51:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

 

 

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.
How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?
How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?
Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?
I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2996 From: ECM Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

 

YES!  What Kevin said!
And 9,600 is not that far off.

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:24:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

 

My 3d models are still available in the Google Sketchup 3d world!

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/collection.html?id=50f5306ccaab25a2fbf563775e4f7513

The Doubletree had two ballrooms with the same dimensions (but the lower floor had columns), so I modeled both for different uses.

Overall dimensions were approximately 71×142=10000 sq.ft. across four equal bays; we split one off for the green room and did a wide house design for the main stage, and used that all weekend. We used part of the lower ballroom for the fashion show, and part for the dealers room. All the models are in the collection.

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model.html?id=3eae15a409ccc3f139ab9a829112caca

Kevin

Kevin

 

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:31 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ask Kevin how big their main room was – I’d guess his numbers would align with yours best.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:52 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.

How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?

How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?

Betsy

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….

What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?

I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2997 From: spiritof_76 Date: 3/22/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room

CC31 had 5184 for main events and 2808 for Green Room. IIRC, main
events was set for an audience of 300.

Michael

On 2016-03-22 07:10, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….
>
> What was the size of your main event room? 7,000? 8,000? 9,000?
>
> I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau
> and have this room being 10,000 square feet. Of course, some of my
> favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they
> don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this
> down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style
> and that’s what we want, right?
>
>
>
> ————————-
> Posted by: beckieboo817@yahoo.com
> ————————-
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 2998 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
Thanks Kevin!

What were your attendance and room nights?

Sharon

 

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@twistedimage.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

My 3d models are still available in the Google Sketchup 3d world!

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/collection.html?id=50f5306ccaab25a2fbf563775e4f7513

The Doubletree had two ballrooms with the same dimensions (but the lower floor had columns), so I modeled both for different uses.

Overall dimensions were approximately 71×142=10000 sq.ft. across four equal bays; we split one off for the green room and did a wide house design for the main stage, and used that all weekend. We used part of the lower ballroom for the fashion show, and part for the dealers room. All the models are in the collection.

https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model.html?id=3eae15a409ccc3f139ab9a829112caca

Kevin

Kevin

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:31 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Ask Kevin how big their main room was – I’d guess his numbers would align with yours best.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:52 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Size of main event room

If it helps, ours for this year is 9600, which is more than we anticipate actually needing.

On March 22, 2016, at 9:31 AM, “Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Not necessarily. Remember that a portion of your audience is actually likely to be on stage or backstage, so extra large space may not be as necessary as you think. Even with the larger cons, you want enough space for the stage and seating for those who aren’t competing, plus those who finished the competition but want to watch after they’re done with fan photo.

CCXV ran into trouble when we had over 100 bodies in competition at the SF masquerade, because the green room wasn’t large enough to handle everyone comfortably. I still regret making that error in judgment when estimating the spaces to use for supporting the masquerade.

How large is your stage expected to be? How much space will you need for lights? Tech? Judges?

How big have the last five CCs been at the SF masquerade and how many of those were onstage first?

Betsy

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi, everyone,

This is for previous runners of Costume Cons….

What was the size of your main event room?  7,000?  8,000? 9,000?

I finally submitted my RFP to the local visitors and convention bureau and have this room being 10,000 square feet.  Of course, some of my favorite choices are coming back saying they can’t host because they don’t meet the requirements….I’m thinking I’m needing to drop this down a bit. One place with 9,600 sq ft could seat 1,000 theater style and that’s what we want, right?

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>

————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2999 From: marg1066 Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Size of main event room
At CC30, our main ballroom was 9384 sf. We used 3300 of it for the main green room, sectioned off with partitions, so leaving room for tech and stage, we had room left for probably 300 or so chairs.

 

Group: runacc Message: 3000 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
I’d also be interested in attendance numbers. http://www.costume-con.org/gallery2/main.php has information for dates, locations, etc. but not attendance.

Can those numbers be posted here, or sent to me? Mostly interested for budgeting purposes, including room nights and function space sizes needed/used, F&B spent, etc.

Any budgets (especially with final numbers)  that can be shared would be useful as well.

Sharon

 

 

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I could probably dig up figures for CC25, but they’re probably a little too out of date.  However, I can tell you that the region where you’re holding your Cc and whether there has been one there in the past will have a bearing on said numbers.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 9:03 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Attendance and room counts

 

 

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 3001 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts

It’s an interesting set of statistics, but would be better maintained in a spreadsheet. Do we have data for the last 10? I wouldn’t go further back than that.

-Betsy

 

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sharon Sbarsky sbarsky@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’d also be interested in attendance numbers. http://www.costume-con.org/gallery2/main.php has information for dates, locations, etc. but not attendance.

Can those numbers be posted here, or sent to me? Mostly interested for budgeting purposes, including room nights and function space sizes needed/used, F&B spent, etc.

Any budgets (especially with final numbers)  that can be shared would be useful as well.

Sharon

 

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I could probably dig up figures for CC25, but they’re probably a little too out of date.  However, I can tell you that the region where you’re holding your Cc and whether there has been one there in the past will have a bearing on said numbers.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 9:03 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Attendance and room counts

 

 

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 3002 From: Sharon Sbarsky Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts
I started my post giving the long list of Worldcons and Smofcons as examples. Those are kept is pseudo spreadsheets as html table pages. I’ll be willing to setup a Google doc that can be shared (or embeded in the costume-con.org site.

Yes, the last 10 years are most relevant to budgeting and planning, but the ~25 years before is also useful for historical reasons. 😀

Can someone post the last 10 here? Or as many of them that are known? I didn’t search the entire archive of this group.

Sharon

 

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It’s an interesting set of statistics, but would be better maintained in a spreadsheet. Do we have data for the last 10? I wouldn’t go further back than that.

-Betsy

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sharon Sbarsky sbarsky@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’d also be interested in attendance numbers. http://www.costume-con.org/gallery2/main.php has information for dates, locations, etc. but not attendance.

Can those numbers be posted here, or sent to me? Mostly interested for budgeting purposes, including room nights and function space sizes needed/used, F&B spent, etc.

Any budgets (especially with final numbers)  that can be shared would be useful as well.

Sharon

 

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I could probably dig up figures for CC25, but they’re probably a little too out of date.  However, I can tell you that the region where you’re holding your Cc and whether there has been one there in the past will have a bearing on said numbers.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 9:03 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Attendance and room counts

 

 

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 3003 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2016
Subject: Re: Attendance and room counts

The numbers for CCXV are on costume-con.org under ConStitution (as a sample, but it’s the final numbers we had).

You’re welcome to crib from that if you want. 8)
Betsy

 

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Sharon Sbarsky sbarsky@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I started my post giving the long list of Worldcons and Smofcons as examples. Those are kept is pseudo spreadsheets as html table pages. I’ll be willing to setup a Google doc that can be shared (or embeded in the costume-con.org site.

Yes, the last 10 years are most relevant to budgeting and planning, but the ~25 years before is also useful for historical reasons. 😀

Can someone post the last 10 here? Or as many of them that are known? I didn’t search the entire archive of this group.

Sharon

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

It’s an interesting set of statistics, but would be better maintained in a spreadsheet. Do we have data for the last 10? I wouldn’t go further back than that.

-Betsy

 

 

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sharon Sbarsky sbarsky@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’d also be interested in attendance numbers. http://www.costume-con.org/gallery2/main.php has information for dates, locations, etc. but not attendance.

Can those numbers be posted here, or sent to me? Mostly interested for budgeting purposes, including room nights and function space sizes needed/used, F&B spent, etc.

Any budgets (especially with final numbers)  that can be shared would be useful as well.

Sharon

 

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I could probably dig up figures for CC25, but they’re probably a little too out of date.  However, I can tell you that the region where you’re holding your Cc and whether there has been one there in the past will have a bearing on said numbers.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 9:03 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Attendance and room counts

 

 

Hi everyone,

 

This is a question for the last 5 – 6 years of costume cons. I’m needing to give my supporting 501C3  reassurances of how viable a costume con is. So, would the people who have the info let me know what their attendance numbers were for their conventions and rooms sold and if possible what their room nights were for each night the week of the con?  I’m trying to prepare a report to give them.

 

I know the numbers for CC30. I’ve had some feed back from Kevin on hotel contracts and I think numbers. I know Dawn has told me some of what she has. But I’d still like a more complete picture.

 

So, what were the attendance numbers?

What were the total rooms sold? Can you break it down per night?

Did you break even or made a profit?  Or did you lose money?

 

I would appreciate any and all help.

 

 

 

 



Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 59 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 59 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2904 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Exhibits – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2905 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Dealers Room – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2906 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Last Recommendation – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2907 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2908 From: ECM Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2909 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2910 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/13/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2911 From: Kaijugal . Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2912 From: Kaijugal . Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers – Skills vs talking heads.
Group: runacc Message: 2913 From: spiritof_76 Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2914 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2915 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2916 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2917 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/21/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Group: runacc Message: 2918 From: beckieboo817 Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Desriptions
Group: runacc Message: 2919 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
Group: runacc Message: 2920 From: beckieboo817 Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
Group: runacc Message: 2921 From: Kevin Roche Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
Group: runacc Message: 2922 From: ECM Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
Group: runacc Message: 2923 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2924 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2925 From: Kevin Roche Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2926 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2927 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2928 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2929 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2930 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2931 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2932 From: Tina Connell Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2933 From: Tina Connell Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2934 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2935 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/26/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2936 From: Sarah Bloy Date: 8/2/2015
Subject: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2937 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2938 From: lisa A Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2939 From: ma0902432 Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2940 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/4/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2941 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 8/4/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2942 From: Kaijugal . Date: 8/13/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Group: runacc Message: 2943 From: Kaijugal . Date: 8/13/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2944 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/14/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2945 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/14/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Group: runacc Message: 2946 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2947 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2948 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Costume-Con Award Ribbon Archives?
Group: runacc Message: 2949 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2950 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2951 From: Kevin Roche Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: Costume-Con Award Ribbon Archives?
Group: runacc Message: 2952 From: axejudge Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
Group: runacc Message: 2953 From: Christine Connell Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2904 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Exhibits – Archival doc

 

 

Exhibit Room – mostly composed of a few of Janet Wilson Anderson’s competition pieces, plus one or two others.   The Archives provided material for a little “slide show” of Janet’s works. 

This one had one bright spot for me.  Having been at JW Anderson’s Making New Mistakes panel and hearing here discuss the My Fair Lady dress at some length, it was nice to be able to go to the exhibits and see the costume and documentation right there.  A real plus.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2905 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Dealers Room – Archival doc

 

 

Dealers Room – There were a whopping TWO dealers: one with beads, one with trim.  Both good dealers, for what they were, but….   How/why did this happen?   The story we heard was because originally, Janet was supposed to bring  AlterYears.

At the last minute, her travel plans changed and she had to fly instead, leaving a huge hole in the Dealers Room.   We suspect there had been no other dealers brought in so that Janet would have no competition or repetition of wares.   This completely backfired and it was too late to do anything about it.  To fill space, the  convention voting table was placed there, along with CC34’s promotion table and one for the SCA.    The rest of the room was taken up by Lisa’s “Miss LIzzy’s Travelling Historical Fashion Show”.   This was a pretty nice display of antique women’s clothing, but it wouldn’t have been in the Dealers Room had things not fallen through.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2906 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Last Recommendation – Archival doc

 

 

This one is about Staff: If someone foresees a year out that there may be something that may interfere with doing their job, there is nothing wrong with backing out – do not feel obligated.   Better to get out early so that the position can be filled,  rather than do it poorly and beg off that they’re “just a volunteer”.

Thus concludes the review.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2907 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Panel speakers

 

 

New topic:

Those of you who go to more cons than us, we have a question:

Is it a trend that there are more costuming panels with one speaker/guest instead of a group of people?    We’ve attended a few events recently where the one person does one thing very well (foam armor, as an example)  but if asked about some other technique to use in addition (say, cloth mache), they are either at a loss or don’t know the proper use of said techniques.   while having an “expert” is certainly good, it seems to point to a problem with too much specialization.   As a result, there’s maybe 2 or three panels that teach ONE THING which people are very interested in, but there would appear to be a lack of sharing of general knowledge.   Sure you can go on line for just about anything these days, but there’s still the whole point of contact thing where panels should still have their place.

Does anyone else have observations about this, and is this something that CCs can do better?

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2908 From: ECM Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

Bruce, I can see your point, but the segments are usually only 50 min. long.  That means that you might get 3 skills watered down to fit, or you get all-you-ever-wanted-to-know about one.  Not an easy choice.

Elaine


 

 

New topic:

Those of you who go to more cons than us, we have a question:

Is it a trend that there are more costuming panels with one speaker/guest instead of a group of people?    We’ve attended a few events recently where the one person does one thing very well (foam armor, as an example)  but if asked about some other technique to use in addition (say, cloth mache), they are either at a loss or don’t know the proper use of said techniques.   while having an “expert” is certainly good, it seems to point to a problem with too much specialization.   As a result, there’s maybe 2 or three panels that teach ONE THING which people are very interested in, but there would appear to be a lack of sharing of general knowledge.   Sure you can go on line for just about anything these days, but there’s still the whole point of contact thing where panels should still have their place.

Does anyone else have observations about this, and is this something that CCs can do better?

Bruce

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2909 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/12/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

It’s not only a trend, it’s a fairly well-established one that has been building for several years.  It began with CCs and has spread to other types of events at which costuming is recognized (e.g., traditional sf cons).

 

I believe the trend has been stimulated by the demand by costumers for program items that teach skills.  Demand seems to have been increasing for increasingly specialized or esoteric skills and program chairs have been trying to meet the demand as best they can.  At Sasquan, apparently one of the costume program items will be titled something like “Sewing Without Patterns,” which strikes me as a pretty esoteric topic for a Worldcon.  (On the other hand, there usually are esoteric topic in other Worldcon program tracks.  Maybe we’re just catching up.)
As we’ve tried to attract new members to our events, we probably have seen a widening of the types of skills persons have sought to learn.    Of course, unless you’re already pretty familiar with a technique, you can’t learn much in one 50-minute session.  In line with the demand, we’re also seeing demand for 80 to 110 minute sessions, at least at CCs.  This eats further into the ability to provide a varied program and may be counter-productive to meeting the demand to learn new and different skills, at least within the time constraints of a weekend event.
Byron

 

On Jul 12, 2015, at 5:45 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

New topic:

Those of you who go to more cons than us, we have a question:

Is it a trend that there are more costuming panels with one speaker/guest instead of a group of people?    We’ve attended a few events recently where the one person does one thing very well (foam armor, as an example)  but if asked about some other technique to use in addition (say, cloth mache), they are either at a loss or don’t know the proper use of said techniques.   while having an “expert” is certainly good, it seems to point to a problem with too much specialization.   As a result, there’s maybe 2 or three panels that teach ONE THING which people are very interested in, but there would appear to be a lack of sharing of general knowledge.   Sure you can go on line for just about anything these days, but there’s still the whole point of contact thing where panels should still have their place.

Does anyone else have observations about this, and is this something that CCs can do better?

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2910 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/13/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
Eh, I don’t know that it’s a trend…maybe in some circles but not in any I’ve been running in. All the cons we’ve been to for CC34 this year have only had generic “beginner” panels and maybe a generic “advanced” panel. Meanwhile, we’ve submitted more specific-topic panels for Geek-kon and when we do, we have at least two people (more often than not, too many) per subject, like wigs or props or historical undergarments.

I can see where adding very specific costuming topics into the panel schedule is great for costumers, because there are a lot of really new and not necessarily easy methods, particularly for armor and props, that people want to see in person. As long as the topic is billed as ONLY about that method, then having one speaker teaching ONLY about that method is perfectly legit and it’s on the questioner for asking something unrelated. It’s like going to a panel about sewing and asking about wig styling. It’s not the solo panelist’s fault they can’t answer that question.

CC’s always been good about this, though, with some caveats year to year depending on who’s writing the panel descriptions and whether there’s good communication between the events head and the panelists. I don’t see anything wrong with a solo panelist, nor with a streamlined topic. Love ’em. Want more of ’em. Especially at CC where you’re coming to actually learn these specialized things and don’t need “cosplay 101” all over again. It really comes down to the panelist writing exactly what they mean to do (and sticking with it!!) and the events head making sure that the program book has that information, and a concise title for the panel, so people know what they’re walking into.

Stace

 

Group: runacc Message: 2911 From: Kaijugal . Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

“Is it a trend that there are more costuming panels with one speaker/guest instead of a group of people?”

It’s not a trend here,  (Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal triangle), that I am aware of. Most panels are still made up of 3-6 panelists.
I do see that with some newer conventions, it’s more common for the cosplay models, (which I will separate from the

costuming pros & costume community guests), to do solo panels on a subject. I imagine it helps keep the focus on them, and keeps them in “work”.

When I personally develop programming I tend to follow the traditions I grew up with:
Panels: 3-6 people
Demos: 1 specialist, possibly 1 or 2 satellite helpers/models
Workshops: Usually 1 person leading, with possible additional helpers.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:45:15 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Panel speakers

 

 

New topic:

Those of you who go to more cons than us, we have a question:

Is it a trend that there are more costuming panels with one speaker/guest instead of a group of people?    We’ve attended a few events recently where the one person does one thing very well (foam armor, as an example)  but if asked about some other technique to use in addition (say, cloth mache), they are either at a loss or don’t know the proper use of said techniques.   while having an “expert” is certainly good, it seems to point to a problem with too much specialization.   As a result, there’s maybe 2 or three panels that teach ONE THING which people are very interested in, but there would appear to be a lack of sharing of general knowledge.   Sure you can go on line for just about anything these days, but there’s still the whole point of contact thing where panels should still have their place.

Does anyone else have observations about this, and is this something that CCs can do better?

Bruce

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2912 From: Kaijugal . Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers – Skills vs talking heads.

 

Byron wrote: “I believe the trend has been stimulated by the demand by costumers for program items that teach skills.”
I have to agree with what Byron says as well, (which plays into why I like to program and attend demos and workshops).

This is the reason why we tried to have so many demos at CC32, (e.g. the Turban wrapping one), because

many of the costumers have been at the game a long time, and as Elaine said, don’t need yet another Cosplay 101
talking heads panel. We have to appeal to those people as well as the new attendees.
Balance is a tricky thing. I’d be interested to see a breakdown of what type of panels people did, (or desired) to attend at
CC32, but the con is too far gone now. Perhaps that would make for an interesting study at future Costume-Cons. 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2913 From: spiritof_76 Date: 7/16/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers
At a convention here in Denver, the Programming Director is very old
school. She doesn’t consider any programming item to have any real
value unless it’s a panel with 3-5 panelists with a moderator leading
the discussion with pre-assigned questions. Anything else is just a fan
panel and complete fluff. If you have a powerpoint presentation, you’re
a fan panel.

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 2914 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

 

Dawn’s input aside, the weakness I see here is:

 

1.  If that person can’t do their panel, then that whole slot is lost, whereas other panelists could (hopefully) take up the slack.

2.   It becomes even more important to make sure your panelist is a good communicator.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 11:33 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Panel speakers

Eh, I don’t know that it’s a trend…maybe in some circles but not in any I’ve been running in. All the cons we’ve been to for CC34 this year have only had generic “beginner” panels and maybe a generic “advanced” panel. Meanwhile, we’ve submitted more specific-topic panels for Geek-kon and when we do, we have at least two people (more often than not, too many) per subject, like wigs or props or historical undergarments.

I can see where adding very specific costuming topics into the panel schedule is great for costumers, because there are a lot of really new and not necessarily easy methods, particularly for armor and props, that people want to see in person. As long as the topic is billed as ONLY about that method, then having one speaker teaching ONLY about that method is perfectly legit and it’s on the questioner for asking something unrelated. It’s like going to a panel about sewing and asking about wig styling. It’s not the solo panelist’s fault they can’t answer that question.

CC’s always been good about this, though, with some caveats year to year depending on who’s writing the panel descriptions and whether there’s good communication between the events head and the panelists. I don’t see anything wrong with a solo panelist, nor with a streamlined topic. Love ’em. Want more of ’em. Especially at CC where you’re coming to actually learn these specialized things and don’t need “cosplay 101” all over again. It really comes down to the panelist writing exactly what they mean to do (and sticking with it!!) and the events head making sure that the program book has that information, and a concise title for the panel, so people know what they’re walking into.

Stace

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2915 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

I haven’t seen a shift to single-presenter panels. Single-presenter workshops, certainly. Single-presenter trunk shows, lectures and retrospectives, sure.

But panels? It’s not a “panel” if there’s only one presenter.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2916 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/17/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

That’s certainly true.  However, I was speaking about program items, not “panels.”  I’ve given one-person lectures, myself, and I know of a lot of other types of one-person demos and workshops.  Bruce’s two comments are just as applicable to them as to “panels” of one person.

 

Byron

 

 

On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I haven’t seen a shift to single-presenter panels. Single-presenter workshops, certainly. Single-presenter trunk shows, lectures and retrospectives, sure.

But panels? It’s not a “panel” if there’s only one presenter.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2917 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/21/2015
Subject: Re: Panel speakers

 

 

Yeah, I was pretty much using “panel” as a generic catch-all word.  but no one uses the word “lecture” in their programming listings, for obvious reasons.    “Workshops” are common, but some (not all) wind up being lectures.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:57 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Panel speakers

That’s certainly true.  However, I was speaking about program items, not “panels.”  I’ve given one-person lectures, myself, and I know of a lot of other types of one-person demos and workshops.  Bruce’s two comments are just as applicable to them as to “panels” of one person.

Byron

 

On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I haven’t seen a shift to single-presenter panels. Single-presenter workshops, certainly. Single-presenter trunk shows, lectures and retrospectives, sure.

 

But panels? It’s not a “panel” if there’s only one presenter.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2918 From: beckieboo817 Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Desriptions

Hi, Y’All

 

We’ve got the website set up kind of for CC36 (cc36sandiego.org) and if I could, I would like it if people could help with descriptions of the various masquerades.  I’m not sure where else to go to get descriptions that are adequate to explain what we’re expecting from the masses

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2919 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions

 

These really do have to come from the MDs.  Anything else is guess-work.

 

Byron

 

 

On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:10 PM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hi, Y’All

 

We’ve got the website set up kind of for CC36 (cc36sandiego.org) and if I could, I would like it if people could help with descriptions of the various masquerades.  I’m not sure where else to go to get descriptions that are adequate to explain what we’re expecting from the masses

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2920 From: beckieboo817 Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
See, I wondered about that but I also wondered if these could just be a generic type of description.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2921 From: Kevin Roche Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions
You’re welcome to crib from the stuff that is still up on cc26.org 🙂

http://www.cc26.info/main.php?section=events

 

 

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

See, I wondered about that but I also wondered if these could just be a generic type of description.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2922 From: ECM Date: 7/22/2015
Subject: Re: Desriptions

 

CC30.com is still there, too.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [runacc] Desriptions

 

You’re welcome to crib from the stuff that is still up on cc26.org 🙂

http://www.cc26.info/main.php?section=events

 

 

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

See, I wondered about that but I also wondered if these could just be a generic type of description.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2923 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: heading off drama

So I have a unique situation and would like some perspective from other past directors, green room staff, etc.

At CONvergence this year there was a performance that gave birth to a special snowflake of epic proportions. When she didn’t win, she took to Facebook lambasting everyone involved in the masquerade, from the judges to the director to who knows what. Another diva fed her ego by giving her incorrect facts he made by assumption, such as “the workmanship judges had no ICG experience” (one was the founder of MNSOC and the other was a former officer in MACS, both of whom have won Best in Show at Costume-Con), but this girl took it and ran with it, and her vitrol got so bad that the CVG masquerade director quit about a week after the con.

Now, I was a green room handler for this show, so I witnessed pretty much everything, and was observing in the deliberation room while the judges were deciding so I could snap up a Novice who didn’t win a major award and give them the free CC34 membership. I had no influence, I was merely an observer. The snowflake’s specific complaints are unfounded, she’s merely reacting out of a combo of severe sour grapes + unfortunate hinging of her mental state and coping skills on an award. However, now she has gone around to her friends and other costumers’ Facebooks openly declaring that she’s bringing this entry to CC34.

As the director for the SF&F, which she would be entering, how far is too far to go to balance her right to compete and bring a very nice costume to the stage versus preventing backstage drama and more sour grapes? We’ve all been witness to green room breakdowns and post-show griping about how the awards fell, hell we’ve probably been the ones to break down or complain. Lord knows I’ve lost my shit under stress. We also know plenty of people who are completely lovely 99% of the time but during a certain window of time before/during the masquerade, can become snowflakes themselves. So, I don’t want to blacklist her or lay extra rules on her just because I’ve witnessed her behavior, which stretched out for weeks after the con and involved slandering a lot of people who were only doing their jobs. But at the same time, I really don’t want her to pull this shit on CC in general. It’s not that we can’t handle drama, and I’m not ruffled from the director’s standpoint, but it’s a headache nobody really needs to deal with if we don’t have to.

I don’t want to give out too many details of her costume or performance in case some of my judges not-yet-picked are on the list, but it did involve set pieces which may be too large for our stage, plus some special effects which automatically violate CC’s rules. If she wanted to bring the entirety of her performance, she would have to cut out the effects entirely – which I think is actually the real point of her performance, not her costume so much – and depending on what we discover in terms of stage size and accessibility, her set pieces might (or might not) be too large for the stage. Technically, she should have been disqualified on the spot for violating the director’s permissions and putting glitter on the stage, but the director allowed her to be considered with the rest and she simply didn’t win an award. So, I do have inside knowledge that at least at CVG, she thought she could go over the director’s head and add an element to her performance that was not allowed. I’m actually less concerned about her taking to the internet to decry the unfairness of ICG rules and more concerned that she would pull a stunt like that and leave the stage covered in glitter and confetti and all she would get is a disqualification, while the stage crew is left cleaning up a mess before the photo run and all the other competitors would have to risk getting crap on their costumes.

Like I say, it’s sort of a unique situation in that I have inside information ahead of time. She isn’t yet registered for CC, but she sounds extremely determined to compete there. She seems to hold ICG-level competition in high regard, for what it’s worth.

Stace

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2924 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

Yanno…

There’s not a lot you can do to head off drama.

The first part (glitter) is what enforcing the rules is for. My entry blanks always include a photo release, a liability release, and an “I have read and understand the rules” release. I’m a lot less forgiving than I used to be on rules violations after I had a cheating incident in a masquerade we were running, and after I had a teenager not bring an axe to rehearsal and check it out with the weapons master at CC26, and then scare the hell out of the stage crew when she walked.

If the rules said “no messes on the stage” I would have informed the entrant she was disqualified and gone out before I handed the stage to the judges for awards and announced to the audience that the entry was disqualified.

 

 

The bad behavior? This is the kind of thing that a general code-of-conduct is meant to handle. I’m expecting that her reaction would be a perfect reason to eject her from the convention for code-of-conduct violations, and the rest of the people in the green room would cheer.

Depending on how bad her online behavior is, CVG might have reason to talk with her about conduct violations. Just because the last day of the con is past doesn’t mean that con-related harassment has to be tolerated.

Have a vacuum ready 😉

 

Group: runacc Message: 2925 From: Kevin Roche Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

 

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Yanno…

There’s not a lot you can do to head off drama.

The first part (glitter) is what enforcing the rules is for. My entry blanks always include a photo release, a liability release, and an “I have read and understand the rules” release. I’m a lot less forgiving than I used to be on rules violations after I had a cheating incident in a masquerade we were running, and after I had a teenager not bring an axe to rehearsal and check it out with the weapons master at CC26, and then scare the hell out of the stage crew when she walked.

If the rules said “no messes on the stage” I would have informed the entrant she was disqualified and gone out before I handed the stage to the judges for awards and announced to the audience that the entry was disqualified.

The bad behavior? This is the kind of thing that a general code-of-conduct is meant to handle. I’m expecting that her reaction would be a perfect reason to eject her from the convention for code-of-conduct violations, and the rest of the people in the green room would cheer.

Depending on how bad her online behavior is, CVG might have reason to talk with her about conduct violations. Just because the last day of the con is past doesn’t mean that con-related harassment has to be tolerated.

Have a vacuum ready 😉

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2926 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/23/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

Stace —

 

I agree with Kevin and Andy.  If, as I hope and expect, CC 34 has a code of conduct and informs every member that adherence to the code is required as a condition of membership, the con could revoke a person’s membership, if that’s the appropriate response to a violation.  However, that’s the con’s decision, not yours as MD.  As MD, however, you should enforce your rules, including any about leaving a mess on the stage.  For such a violation, I would pause the masquerade immediately, have the house lights turned up, and announce from the MC’s lectern that the entry has been disqualified for violation of the masquerade rules.  (I did that once when a bozo in the audience used flash photography, and required the offender be ejected from the room before the show would resume. My rules banned flash photography from the audience and the MC had told the audience so before the show began.)
You may want to think about briefing the tech director, the stage manager, the head ninja, the MC, and the person’s den mom about the potential for inappropriate behavior.  I’m not certain you should take this step; however, if you do, emphasize the need to keep the briefing in camera.
Byron

 

 

On Jul 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@twistedimage.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



Yanno…

There’s not a lot you can do to head off drama.

The first part (glitter) is what enforcing the rules is for. My entry blanks always include a photo release, a liability release, and an “I have read and understand the rules” release. I’m a lot less forgiving than I used to be on rules violations after I had a cheating incident in a masquerade we were running, and after I had a teenager not bring an axe to rehearsal and check it out with the weapons master at CC26, and then scare the hell out of the stage crew when she walked.

If the rules said “no messes on the stage” I would have informed the entrant she was disqualified and gone out before I handed the stage to the judges for awards and announced to the audience that the entry was disqualified.

The bad behavior? This is the kind of thing that a general code-of-conduct is meant to handle. I’m expecting that her reaction would be a perfect reason to eject her from the convention for code-of-conduct violations, and the rest of the people in the green room would cheer.

Depending on how bad her online behavior is, CVG might have reason to talk with her about conduct violations. Just because the last day of the con is past doesn’t mean that con-related harassment has to be tolerated.
Have a vacuum ready 😉



 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2927 From: staceylee25 Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

Excellent advice, thanks guys. I’ll be able to formulate a prepared response based on those ideas.

I don’t think we have a code of conduct for CC34, however. I know all the contests have their rules posted, and if we don’t have a general weapons/costume policy posted we really should. Can you point me to an example of a code of conduct from a past CC or similar venue?

I mean, smaller cons always have rules but I don’t recall seeing some for CC before. Maybe I just never looked because I assumed we were all adults who knew how to handle ourselves and each other.

I’m probably also going to comb back through the SF&F rules to make sure there’s no ambiguous language. I feel like “don’t throw glitter on the stage” is already understood but I might want to state it outright.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <byronpconnell@…> wrote :

Stace —

I agree with Kevin and Andy.  If, as I hope and expect, CC 34 has a code of conduct and informs every member that adherence to the code is required as a condition of membership, the con could revoke a person’s membership, if that’s the appropriate response to a violation.  However, that’s the con’s decision, not yours as MD.  As MD, however, you should enforce your rules, including any about leaving a mess on the stage.  For such a violation, I would pause the masquerade immediately, have the house lights turned up, and announce from the MC’s lectern that the entry has been disqualified for violation of the masquerade rules.  (I did that once when a bozo in the audience used flash photography, and required the offender be ejected from the room before the show would resume. My rules banned flash photography from the audience and the MC had told the audience so before the show began.)
You may want to think about briefing the tech director, the stage manager, the head ninja, the MC, and the person’s den mom about the potential for inappropriate behavior.  I’m not certain you should take this step; however, if you do, emphasize the need to keep the briefing in camera.
Byron

 

 

 

On Jul 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@… [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2928 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

 

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Excellent advice, thanks guys. I’ll be able to formulate a prepared response based on those ideas.

I don’t think we have a code of conduct for CC34, however. I know all the contests have their rules posted, and if we don’t have a general weapons/costume policy posted we really should. Can you point me to an example of a code of conduct from a past CC or similar venue?

I mean, smaller cons always have rules but I don’t recall seeing some for CC before. Maybe I just never looked because I assumed we were all adults who knew how to handle ourselves and each other.

I’m probably also going to comb back through the SF&F rules to make sure there’s no ambiguous language. I feel like “don’t throw glitter on the stage” is already understood but I might want to state it outright.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <byronpconnell@…> wrote :

Stace —

I agree with Kevin and Andy.  If, as I hope and expect, CC 34 has a code of conduct and informs every member that adherence to the code is required as a condition of membership, the con could revoke a person’s membership, if that’s the appropriate response to a violation.  However, that’s the con’s decision, not yours as MD.  As MD, however, you should enforce your rules, including any about leaving a mess on the stage.  For such a violation, I would pause the masquerade immediately, have the house lights turned up, and announce from the MC’s lectern that the entry has been disqualified for violation of the masquerade rules.  (I did that once when a bozo in the audience used flash photography, and required the offender be ejected from the room before the show would resume. My rules banned flash photography from the audience and the MC had told the audience so before the show began.)
You may want to think about briefing the tech director, the stage manager, the head ninja, the MC, and the person’s den mom about the potential for inappropriate behavior.  I’m not certain you should take this step; however, if you do, emphasize the need to keep the briefing in camera.
Byron

 

 

 

On Jul 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@… [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2929 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

 

I can’t add too much to this – Andy and Kevin pretty much covered it all.   Al I’d say is that glitter should be considered as part of the rule against “no messy substances”.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 11:54 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] heading off drama

So I have a unique situation and would like some perspective from other past directors, green room staff, etc.

At CONvergence this year there was a performance that gave birth to a special snowflake of epic proportions. When she didn’t win, she took to Facebook lambasting everyone involved in the masquerade, from the judges to the director to who knows what. Another diva fed her ego by giving her incorrect facts he made by assumption, such as “the workmanship judges had no ICG experience” (one was the founder of MNSOC and the other was a former officer in MACS, both of whom have won Best in Show at Costume-Con), but this girl took it and ran with it, and her vitrol got so bad that the CVG masquerade director quit about a week after the con.

Now, I was a green room handler for this show, so I witnessed pretty much everything, and was observing in the deliberation room while the judges were deciding so I could snap up a Novice who didn’t win a major award and give them the free CC34 membership. I had no influence, I was merely an observer. The snowflake’s specific complaints are unfounded, she’s merely reacting out of a combo of severe sour grapes + unfortunate hinging of her mental state and coping skills on an award. However, now she has gone around to her friends and other costumers’ Facebooks openly declaring that she’s bringing this entry to CC34.

As the director for the SF&F, which she would be entering, how far is too far to go to balance her right to compete and bring a very nice costume to the stage versus preventing backstage drama and more sour grapes? We’ve all been witness to green room breakdowns and post-show griping about how the awards fell, hell we’ve probably been the ones to break down or complain. Lord knows I’ve lost my shit under stress. We also know plenty of people who are completely lovely 99% of the time but during a certain window of time before/during the masquerade, can become snowflakes themselves. So, I d! on’t want to blacklist her or lay extra rules on her just because I’ve witnessed her behavior, which stretched out for weeks after the con and involved slandering a lot of people who were only doing their jobs. But at the same time, I really don’t want her to pull this shit on CC in general. It’s not that we can’t handle drama, and I’m not ruffled from the director’s standpoint, but it’s a headache nobody really needs to deal with if we don’t have to.

I don’t want to give out too many details of her costume or performance in case some of my judges not-yet-picked are on the list, but it did involve set pieces which may be too large for our stage, plus some special effects which automatically violate CC’s rules. If she wanted to bring the entirety of her performance, she would have to cut out the effects entirely – which I think is actually the real point of her performance, not her costume so much – and depending on what we discover in terms of stage size and accessibility, her set pieces might (or might not) be too large for the stage. Technically, she should have been disqualified on the spot for violating the director’s permissions and putting glitter on the stage, but the director allowed her to be considered with the rest and she simply didn’t win an award. So, I do have inside knowledge that at least at CVG, she thought she could go over the director’s head and add an element to her performance that was not allowed. I’m actually less concerned about her taking to the internet to decry the unfairness of ICG rules and more concerned that she would pull a stunt like that and leave the stage covered in glitter and confetti and all she would get is a disqualification, while the stage crew is left cleaning up a mess before the photo run and all the other competitors would have to risk getting crap on their costumes.

Like I say, it’s sort of a unique situation in that I have inside information ahead of time. She isn’t yet registered ! for CC, but she sounds extremely determined to compete there. She seems to hold ICG-level competition in high regard, for what it’s worth.

Stace

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2930 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

A code of conduct for members at CC34 is not out of the realm of possibility.

 

On July 24, 2015, at 12:05 PM, “Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Excellent advice, thanks guys. I’ll be able to formulate a prepared response based on those ideas.

I don’t think we have a code of conduct for CC34, however. I know all the contests have their rules posted, and if we don’t have a general weapons/costume policy posted we really should. Can you point me to an example of a code of conduct from a past CC or similar venue?

I mean, smaller cons always have rules but I don’t recall seeing some for CC before. Maybe I just never looked because I assumed we were all adults who knew how to handle ourselves and each other.

I’m probably also going to comb back through the SF&F rules to make sure there’s no ambiguous language. I feel like “don’t throw glitter on the stage” is already understood but I might want to state it outright.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <byronpconnell@…> wrote :

Stace —

I agree with Kevin and Andy.  If, as I hope and expect, CC 34 has a code of conduct and informs every member that adherence to the code is required as a condition of membership, the con could revoke a person’s membership, if that’s the appropriate response to a violation.  However, that’s the con’s decision, not yours as MD.  As MD, however, you should enforce your rules, including any about leaving a mess on the stage.  For such a violation, I would pause the masquerade immediately, have the house lights turned up, and announce from the MC’s lectern that the entry has been disqualified for violation of the masquerade rules.  (I did that once when a bozo in the audience used flash photography, and required the offender be ejected from the room before the show would resume. My rules banned flash photography from the audience and the MC had told the audience so before the show began.)
You may want to think about briefing the tech director, the stage manager, the head ninja, the MC, and the person’s den mom about the potential for inappropriate behavior.  I’m not certain you should take this step; however, if you do, emphasize the need to keep the briefing in camera.
Byron

 

 

 

On Jul 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@… [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2931 From: Byron Connell Date: 7/24/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

CC 33’s harassment policy is at http://cc33charleston.org/wp/harassment-policy/  Of course, this isn’t a full code of conduct.

 

Byron

 

 

On Jul 24, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Sarah A Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

A code of conduct for members at CC34 is not out of the realm of possibility.



On July 24, 2015, at 12:05 PM, “Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 

 

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



Excellent advice, thanks guys. I’ll be able to formulate a prepared response based on those ideas.

I don’t think we have a code of conduct for CC34, however. I know all the contests have their rules posted, and if we don’t have a general weapons/costume policy posted we really should. Can you point me to an example of a code of conduct from a past CC or similar venue?

I mean, smaller cons always have rules but I don’t recall seeing some for CC before. Maybe I just never looked because I assumed we were all adults who knew how to handle ourselves and each other.

I’m probably also going to comb back through the SF&F rules to make sure there’s no ambiguous language. I feel like “don’t throw glitter on the stage” is already understood but I might want to state it outright.

Stace



—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <byronpconnell@…> wrote :

Stace —

I agree with Kevin and Andy.  If, as I hope and expect, CC 34 has a code of conduct and informs every member that adherence to the code is required as a condition of membership, the con could revoke a person’s membership, if that’s the appropriate response to a violation.  However, that’s the con’s decision, not yours as MD.  As MD, however, you should enforce your rules, including any about leaving a mess on the stage.  For such a violation, I would pause the masquerade immediately, have the house lights turned up, and announce from the MC’s lectern that the entry has been disqualified for violation of the masquerade rules.  (I did that once when a bozo in the audience used flash photography, and required the offender be ejected from the room before the show would resume. My rules banned flash photography from the audience and the MC had told the audience so before the show began.)
You may want to think about briefing the tech director, the stage manager, the head ninja, the MC, and the person’s den mom about the potential for inappropriate behavior.  I’m not certain you should take this step; however, if you do, emphasize the need to keep the briefing in camera.
Byron

 

 

 

On Jul 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@… [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Also — you *were* a witness to her behavior in the green room and you *are* the F&SF director.

If she enters, it is not inappropriate for *you* to say *to her* that you expect her to follow the rules and the code of conduct, which her behavior would have violated had she been in a CC competition. You actually witnessed the behavior, after all, and are not operating from hearsay.

Kevin

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2932 From: Tina Connell Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
​I was talking to Byron about this while we were out running errands yesterday, and my reaction was that making a mess on stage should be considered like flash photography — ‘if you make a mess (in violation of the previously signed masquerade rules), the masquerade will be stopped until the contestant goes back on stage and completely cleans up his/her mess, or the contestant will be automatically disqualified.’  If you wanted, you could clarify ‘messy’ as ‘substances that may adhere to other costumes or clothing, such as but not limited to, glitter or sequins.’  Same thing with the weapons policy: if you break it, you’re broke (disqualified). You’re still almost a year out, so a change now shouldn’t raise eyebrows. Each contestant should, in any case, be given a copy to take with them, when they sign off on the masq. rules, so they can’t claim they didn’t know, after the fact.
The cautions in the Further Confusion Code of Conduct regarding body paint and hotel furniture are good ones. (Asking the hotel in writing to make available old ratty towels & washcloths for those in body makeup to clean up would be good, if the con com has not already done so.)
I would add to the masquerade rules or code of conduct cautions against body paint vs. other people’s costumes. There’s always somebody who is either oblivious or feels entitled, or who thinks that such considerations don’t apply to them. I personally was exposed to this attitude quite a while back. A very well-known and respected costumer (many years ago) was in full body blue grease paint, and I was den-momming a young lady in a snow white gown who was just ahead of her in the queue to go on stage. Every time I interposed myself between them (the person in blue kept impatiently crowding forward to within an inch or two) I got the nastiest looks from the encroacher for daring to think that a white costume might need to be protected from her grease paint.
Silly String: We found out the hard way when running a local con: SS will adhere to, and can stain, vinyl coated wallpaper, at least as it used to be formulated. The people in the affected guest room had to shell out quite a bit of money for the necessary redecorating and loss of service time.
Tina Connell

 

Group: runacc Message: 2933 From: Tina Connell Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
PS to my previous: In the case of pre-con entries, a copy of both the masq. rules and CoC could be sent back to the entrants along with the confirmation that their entry had been received. ​They may not bother reading them, but you’ll have documented proof that they were informed in advance.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2934 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/25/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

 

I would think they’d have to sign something like that at the time of registration.   One would hope they’d at least read it before signing ANYthing.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 8:17 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

PS to my previous: In the case of pre-con entries, a copy of both the masq. rules and CoC could be sent back to the entrants along with the confirmation that their entry had been received. ​They may not bother reading them, but you’ll have documented proof that they were informed in advance.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2935 From: Christine Connell Date: 7/26/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

Bruce, one always hopes that the contestants will read all of the paperworks, but we also know that there are always people who don’t, and then act aggrieved because the rules they agreed to came back to haunt them. “But why can’t I do (whatever)?” “Did you read the rules? It says right there in black and white that contestants can’t do (whatever) for safety reasons.” “Well, uh, not all the way through — there was a lot to read and I didn’t take the time.”

 

Tina

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2936 From: Sarah Bloy Date: 8/2/2015
Subject: Rare Recorded Video
Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence.  Can anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

 

Group: runacc Message: 2937 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video

Have you tried Eric Cannon on Facebook?

Michael

On 2015-08-02 18:32, Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc]
wrote:

> Greetings all!
>
> I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded
> Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing
> silence.  Can anyone put me in contact with them?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sarah
> CC34 Chair

 

Group: runacc Message: 2938 From: lisa A Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video

 

When I get back to my laptop I will email them for you
Lisa
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

 

——– Original message ——–
From: “Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc]”
Date:08/02/2015 9:32 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video
Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence.  Can anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2939 From: ma0902432 Date: 8/3/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
Sarah, PM me on FB or text me, and I Can give you Eric’s cell phone
number.

Also try: RRVFRIENDS@YAHOO.COM

I”m guessing you already did though.

Lisa a

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:32:09 -0500 “Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com
[runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video
for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence. Can
anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2940 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/4/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video
That email should supposedly work, but he’s also slow about answering. Took about a week or more for me to hear back from him.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

Sarah, PM me on FB or text me, and I Can give you Eric’s cell phone number.

Also try: RRVFRIENDS@YAHOO.COM

I”m guessing you already did though.

Lisa a

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:32:09 -0500 “Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence. Can anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: <lisa58@juno.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2941 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 8/4/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video

 

I know that they’ve been traveling a fair amount this summer, too. May take them a while to catch up on everything.

Trudy


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:13:19 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

 

That email should supposedly work, but he’s also slow about answering. Took about a week or more for me to hear back from him.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

Sarah, PM me on FB or text me, and I Can give you Eric’s cell phone number.

Also try: RRVFRIENDS@YAHOO.COM

I”m guessing you already did though.

Lisa a

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:32:09 -0500 “Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence. Can anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: <lisa58@juno.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2942 From: Kaijugal . Date: 8/13/2015
Subject: Re: Rare Recorded Video

 

Do they no longer use rrvorders@att.net ?

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:21:43 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

 

 

I know that they’ve been traveling a fair amount this summer, too. May take them a while to catch up on everything.

Trudy


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:13:19 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

 

That email should supposedly work, but he’s also slow about answering. Took about a week or more for me to hear back from him.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Rare Recorded Video

Sarah, PM me on FB or text me, and I Can give you Eric’s cell phone number.

Also try: RRVFRIENDS@YAHOO.COM

I”m guessing you already did though.

Lisa a

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 20:32:09 -0500 “Sarah Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Greetings all!

I’ve been trying to get in touch with the folks from Rare Recorded Video for a few months now, but I keep getting met with echoing silence. Can anyone put me in contact with them?

Thanks.

Sarah

CC34 Chair

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: <lisa58@juno.com>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2943 From: Kaijugal . Date: 8/13/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama

 

Of course there will always be the egregious rule breakers who even when told not to something

will do it anyhow, (because by the time they have done it, it will already be too late and they know it), case in point the foam shooting dalek at CC32.

The best we can do is be clear up front what the rules and expectations are, and enforce those expectations by excluding repeat offenders, and those who’s bad behavior threatens others from our future shows and masquerades.

They will throw tantrums, and call you a tyrant and worse, but it’s our job as directors to choose between sparing ourselves the slings and arrows of the badly behaved and the greater good of the costuming community at large.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:54:43 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

 

Bruce, one always hopes that the contestants will read all of the paperworks, but we also know that there are always people who don’t, and then act aggrieved because the rules they agreed to came back to haunt them. “But why can’t I do (whatever)?” “Did you read the rules? It says right there in black and white that contestants can’t do (whatever) for safety reasons.” “Well, uh, not all the way through — there was a lot to read and I didn’t take the time.”

Tina

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2944 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/14/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
And if they violate the rules – you disqualify them. I too point at the
Dalek.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

Of course there will always be the egregious rule breakers who even when
told not to something

will do it anyhow, (because by the time they have done it, it will already
be too late and they know it), case in point the foam shooting dalek at
CC32.

The best we can do is be clear up front what the rules and expectations are,
and enforce those expectations by excluding repeat offenders, and those
who’s bad behavior threatens others from our future shows and masquerades.

They will throw tantrums, and call you a tyrant and worse, but it’s our job
as directors to choose between sparing ourselves the slings and arrows of
the badly behaved and the greater good of the costuming community at large.

_____

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:54:43 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

Bruce, one always hopes that the contestants will read all of the
paperworks, but we also know that there are always people who don’t, and
then act aggrieved because the rules they agreed to came back to haunt them.
“But why can’t I do (whatever)?” “Did you read the rules? It says right
there in black and white that contestants can’t do (whatever) for safety
reasons.” “Well, uh, not all the way through – there was a lot to read and I
didn’t take the time.”

Tina

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2945 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/14/2015
Subject: Re: heading off drama
Drama is always worse when you don’t enforce the rules.

 

 

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:57 PM ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

And if they violate the rules – you disqualify them. I too point at the
Dalek.

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

Of course there will always be the egregious rule breakers who even when
told not to something

will do it anyhow, (because by the time they have done it, it will already
be too late and they know it), case in point the foam shooting dalek at
CC32.

The best we can do is be clear up front what the rules and expectations are,
and enforce those expectations by excluding repeat offenders, and those
who’s bad behavior threatens others from our future shows and masquerades.

They will throw tantrums, and call you a tyrant and worse, but it’s our job
as directors to choose between sparing ourselves the slings and arrows of
the badly behaved and the greater good of the costuming community at large.

_____

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:54:43 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: heading off drama

Bruce, one always hopes that the contestants will read all of the
paperworks, but we also know that there are always people who don’t, and
then act aggrieved because the rules they agreed to came back to haunt them.
“But why can’t I do (whatever)?” “Did you read the rules? It says right
there in black and white that contestants can’t do (whatever) for safety
reasons.” “Well, uh, not all the way through – there was a lot to read and I
didn’t take the time.”

Tina

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2946 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

 

 

A recent post to the CC34 FB page prompted this thought.

Of course we’d be the ones to bring up a question like this!   We’re such wonks when it comes to this stuff.

So, we were talking about  the fact that we’d not gotten the official photos from CC33 yet – we understand that Ken has been pretty busy and only recently started sending stuff out.   But this raised a few questions.   Perhaps some of this can only be answered by Karen, since she’s the Service Mark holder, but there are also other questions/points of interest for pending/future CC committees should be thinking about.

As many of you know, Nora has been helping Karen by getting the official CC photos uploaded to the CC Gallery site, as well as providing the data for said photos.    She reminded them to take into account with their official photographer to make sure that a set is produced for the convention archives.

This got us to thinking.   Thanks to Betsy’s efforts (and others) somehow, the site has a pretty complete record of the major events, and some of the ancillary ones like the Doll Shows, etc.    However, in recent year, it’s become more difficult to obtain the official photos (and sometimes the data) in a timely manner – and in one or two cases, at all.   It has been our assumption that the concoms were required to provide these materials, as part of the Constitution.   But I did a little digging, and discovered that this is not actually specifically delineated.   The closest reference I found that might apply was in paragraph  1.2 Costume-Con Conference Licensing: “Additionally, the Costume-Con conference committee shall send one copy of all publications to the Service Mark Holders to assure that the requirements of 1.1.1 are being maintained.”

 

To us, this is pretty vague for applying to what is, supposedly, one of the most important functions of maintaining  records.   And that seems to be more about pubs before the convention.    Pierre’s always been good about snatching up running lists, and Byron always makes sure both Archives gets the records from the shows he runs.   In the past, there’s always just been a  reliance on individuals and the photographers to get the necessary materials.   To our knowledge, some of the sets of photos used on the CC site have been paid for out of pocket either by Pierre, maybe one or two by us, and some have been provided by the conventions.

I’ve run this thought past Karen, and we (Nora and me) are thinking something needs to be defined more clearly in the Constitution about making it a requirement of the concoms to make sure all records are collected and turned over to the CC Archives.   I would think, since our hobby is now a recognized art form, this becomes even more important for the future.

I think another thing, specifically, needs to be a set of photos needs to be part of a concom’s budget.   In the case of CC21, I can’t access the site at this writing (the site appears to be having problems), but I remember photos being hideously expensive so purchasing an entire set of pictures was not affordable  – can Henry confirm there was/is a representative photo from all the events?   As a separate , for the purposes of promotion of the con, should there be a certain timeliness to getting  photos to the Archives?   Or, with social media, does it matter as much?   (Keeping in mind that no one has the same access to social media.)

Thoughts and suggestions as to wording for an amendment Karen can make?

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2947 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
I made it part of my deal with the photographer to get a set for the
convention.

Michael
CC31

 

Group: runacc Message: 2948 From: spiritof_76 Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Costume-Con Award Ribbon Archives?
An idea I’ve had for a while and prompted by Bruce’s post about photos.
What about putting together a visual archive of CC award ribbons? I’m
sure the Pettingers have most of them. 😉

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 2949 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
I kinda suspected that. Much appreciated.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:31 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

I made it part of my deal with the photographer to get a set for the convention.

Michael
CC31

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2950 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
I used to deal directly with the con chair and the photographer to get the photos. As you may have noticed, CC21 was a particularly tough deal, as the need for archives was not adequately expressed to the photographer in question, and it took some doing to get whatever there was from him.
Yes, I think it should be part of the ConStitution. Yes, I think CC committees ought to budget for it. And yes, I think EVERY coordinator of every event ought to be thinking about the archives and storing the data long term, not just on websites that are just for the con. When I launched Costume-ConNections in the 90s, the web was still relatively new. It took over a year just to acquire what was there, and in some cases even longer as it was proved that there were no official photos for some costumes. And it was a conscious decision on my part to concentrate only on competitions and not on the other possible sources of photos, because we were already in the 10s of thousands for images.
Archivists shouldn’t have to beg for run lists and awards lists and for photos and video. These things should come automatically and be planned for in advance, not afterthoughts for after the event is over.
My not so humble opinion, born of years of legwork running down the materials I did collect from the first 25 years of CC history.
Your mileage may vary.
Betsy

 

 

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:17 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I kinda suspected that.   Much appreciated.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:31 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

I made it part of my deal with the photographer to get a set for the convention.

Michael
CC31

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>

————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/



Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2951 From: Kevin Roche Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: Costume-Con Award Ribbon Archives?

I believe cc26 donated a set to both the ICG archives and the Fan Archives

On Saturday, August 29, 2015, bruno@soulmasque.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

An idea I’ve had for a while and prompted by Bruce’s post about photos.
What about putting together a visual archive of CC award ribbons?  I’m
sure the Pettingers have most of them.  😉

Michael

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2952 From: axejudge Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos

My comment is that the photographer should be *required* to photograph ALL events – not just the masquerades.  This has been a problem in recent years.

Karen

 

On 2015-08-29 16:21, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:

 

 

A recent post to the CC34 FB page prompted this thought.

Of course we’d be the ones to bring up a question like this!   We’re such wonks when it comes to this stuff.

So, we were talking about  the fact that we’d not gotten the official photos from CC33 yet – we understand that Ken has been pretty busy and only recently started sending stuff out.   But this raised a few questions.   Perhaps some of this can only be answered by Karen, since she’s the Service Mark holder, but there are also other questions/points of interest for pending/future CC committees should be thinking about.

As many of you know, Nora has been helping Karen by getting the official CC photos uploaded to the CC Gallery site, as well as providing the data for said photos.    She reminded them to take into account with their official photographer to make sure that a set is produced for the convention archives.

This got us to thinking.   Thanks to Betsy’s efforts (and others) somehow, the site has a pretty complete record of the major events, and some of the ancillary ones like the Doll Shows, etc.    However, in recent year, it’s become more difficult to obtain the official photos (and sometimes the data) in a timely manner – and in one or two cases, at all.   It has been our assumption that the concoms were required to provide these materials, as part of the Constitution.   But I did a little digging, and discovered that this is not actually specifically delineated.   The closest reference I found that might apply was in paragraph  1.2 Costume-Con Conference Licensing: “Additionally, the Costume-Con conference committee shall send one copy of all publications to the Service Mark Holders to assure that the requirements of 1.1.1 are being maintained.”

To us, this is pretty vague for applying to what is, supposedly, one of the most important functions of maintaining  records.   And that seems to be more about pubs before the convention.    Pierre’s always been good about snatching up running lists, and Byron always makes sure both Archives gets the records from the shows he runs.   In the past, there’s always just been a  reliance on individuals and the photographers to get the necessary materials.   To our knowledge, some of the sets of photos used on the CC site have been paid for out of pocket either by Pierre, maybe one or two by us, and some have been provided by the conventions.

I’ve run this thought past Karen, and we (Nora and me) are thinking something needs to be defined more clearly in the Constitution about making it a requirement of the concoms to make sure all records are collected and turned over to the CC Archives.   I would think, since our hobby is now a recognized art form, this becomes even more important for the future.

I think another thing, specifically, needs to be a set of photos needs to be part of a concom’s budget.   In the case of CC21, I can’t access the site at this writing (the site appears to be having problems), but I remember photos being hideously expensive so purchasing an entire set of pictures was not affordable  – can Henry confirm there was/is a representative photo from all the events?   As a separate , for the purposes of promotion of the con, should there be a certain timeliness to getting  photos to the Archives?   Or, with social media, does it matter as much?   (Keeping in mind that no one has the same access to social media.)

Thoughts and suggestions as to wording for an amendment Karen can make?

Bruce

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2953 From: Christine Connell Date: 8/29/2015
Subject: Re: The Costume-Con Archives – especially photos
I’ll look back through my past CC photos. I frequently take photos of the exhibits and doll competitions, and more recently, some of the quilts. If I’ve already submitted some, any duplicates I dig up and send can be ignored, of course. May take me a while, though. Up until just a few years ago, everything was film, not digital.

As many of you know, I particularly like to get close-ups of the neat little detail bits that most people never get to see. A lot of the photos I’ve got were ones in the Green Room or halls, since I seldom actually get to see the masquerade from the audience.

Tina

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 58 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 58 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2854 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – One last recommendation
Group: runacc Message: 2855 From: ma0902432 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2856 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: (NON PROGRAMMING ITEM OF OPINION) (was RE: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review
Group: runacc Message: 2857 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2858 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2859 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2860 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2861 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night
Group: runacc Message: 2862 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2863 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2864 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2865 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron
Group: runacc Message: 2866 From: Elaine Sims Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 REview – Historical
Group: runacc Message: 2867 From: costumrs Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron
Group: runacc Message: 2868 From: axejudge Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron
Group: runacc Message: 2869 From: Les Roth Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron
Group: runacc Message: 2870 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review postings
Group: runacc Message: 2871 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review postings
Group: runacc Message: 2872 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2873 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2874 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2875 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron
Group: runacc Message: 2876 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2877 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions
Group: runacc Message: 2878 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review postings
Group: runacc Message: 2879 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2880 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2881 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2882 From: ECM Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2883 From: ECM Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night
Group: runacc Message: 2884 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade‏
Group: runacc Message: 2885 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2886 From: casamai Date: 6/9/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2887 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/9/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2888 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/10/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2889 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/15/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2890 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/16/2015
Subject: Arrrrgh! Apologies!
Group: runacc Message: 2891 From: von_drago Date: 6/16/2015
Subject: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook
Group: runacc Message: 2892 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/17/2015
Subject: Re: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook
Group: runacc Message: 2893 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/17/2015
Subject: Re: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook
Group: runacc Message: 2894 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Future Fashion Folio – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2895 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hotel – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2896 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2897 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2898 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality (for real) – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2899 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2900 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2901 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Sunday Daytime Activities – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2902 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Historical – Archival doc
Group: runacc Message: 2903 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Monday – Archival doc

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2854 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – One last recommendation

I have heard the “I’m just a volunteer” excuse in every volunteer
organization I have ever belonged to. Yes, we’re all volunteers, who
volunteered to do a job.

Michael

On 2015-06-06 19:29, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:
> if someone foresees a year before the event that there may be some
> personal issues that may interfere with doing their job, there is
> nothing wrong with backing out – they should not feel obligated.
> Better to get out in enough time that the position can be filled,
> rather than doing a poor job and make excuses like “I’m just a
> volunteer”. That is unacceptable – take responsibility or resign.
>
>
>
> ————————-
> Posted by: casamai@sbcglobal.net
> ————————-

 

Group: runacc Message: 2855 From: ma0902432 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming
Hi, Lisa A. here. Yes, I wasked to manage Programming, and I agreed to
volunteer, way back when CC33 was still a bid. Possibly I should have
resigned the responsibility for programming right when Roger died
suddenly in April 2013,and I seriously thought about it, but within
about 2 months of that, I felt like I had already made a good start of it
very early on, and I felt like I was getting a lot of support from the
Con Chairs. I also had many, many ideas for programming, some of which
did not pan out (like the Morning Kaffee Klatsches–I guess I am about
the only consistently early riser who like to sit and drink coffee and
bead or talk or whatever).

I had settled back down into my *new* way of life without Roger, and
thought I Was doing okay being self-sufficient. I had a lot of notes for
programming and suggestions that people had made, specific offers from
people to lead panels or workshops, etc. and some of these were actually
very well-attended at the con and I got good feedback that people had
enjoyed them.

I thought there would be more people to help with the
computer/spreadsheet part, since I don’t consider myself very tech savvy.
I did end up having one really dedicated costumer friend who was willing
to help with that, who was very competent, and who made a big difference.
I will say that getting people to do panels was not as easy as I ‘d
hoped; when I had done programming previously for CC27 in Baltimore it
seemed like more people stepped up and were excited to be leading panels
or workshops. PArt of the problem this time, was possibly that many
people were not coming, for various reasons (who had originally thought
they were), or had issues right before the con that impacted their
schedules.

When I went down to Charleston the year before the con for the site
visit, I was concerned at that time there might not be enough function
space for us, based on what I Was shown and noted down. Of course, no
one can ever really accurately predict what the ultimate attendance will
be, but having only 3 basic function spaces is likely insufficient.

One suggestion I might make, would be that if the various “tracks” of
program genres can be formulated (roughly: workshops, demos, historical,
design, technical, props, fantasy, re-creation, anime, etc–whatever or
however many genres you like) perhaps having different people take
responsibility for each track might add value, as well as decreasing the
stress for any one person. I never thought that programming should just
be one person’s vision; having multiple people, perhaps each with a more
focused interest would be helpful. I did try for a diverse panel list,
given the limited number of function spaces.

We’ve never had a GOH at CC before in my attendance there, so that was a
new twist. I admit to not being in favor of it on principle, but once
the decision was enacted it was my job to work with it as best as
possible. That provided it’s own difficulties, which I would answer
off-list if anyone is specifically interested in that. But it DID tie my
hands to a degree.

There was a certain amount of last minute scheduling drama in many
fronts.

I DO take responsibility for the crappy and less-than-informative
scheduling grids that people had to make sense of at Reg. I Should have
worked out a way to get that information tied together and sent to the
people responsible for the published materials that were handed out at
Reg. so that it would be clear who was leading what panels or workshops.
Even when I tried to get bios from participants and blurbs from them,
there were those that missed the deadline, so I had to write something,
and it may have been less than accurate. I had thought there was going
to be a Mobile app that would do that and would be also linked to the
panelists, and I never knew if that panned out. IT seems like it would
be a good thought in the future, and I”ve used apps like that at
professional conferences I”ve attended in the last few years. I’m sorry
folks–that should have been done better.

The Con Chairs asked me to schedule the “CC101–My First CC” panel twice
and that seemed like a good idea, espcially with different people on it
each time. Friday afternoon and Sat. morning seem like good times for
that.

Yours in costuming, Lisa a

PS: (NON PROGRAMMING ITEM OF OPINION)
My personal opinion is I would like to see the Friday ngiht Social go
back to being a Social without us having to sit and be quiet while
another contest/show is held (and having someone yell at us to be quiet)
. I really miss that opening night “Let’s dress up and chill out”
session, and the people who want to enter the contest–I never got a
chance to talk to any of them that evening.

The Programming person was noticeably distracted by personal events,
leading up to the last few months of the con. There were misgivings
about a peer having their way paid as guest � not sure what precedent
that might set in the future. Opinions were mixed as to the variety of
panels and demos, so there was no consensus one way or another. Most
people liked what they saw. �There was a decent variety, just not
enough of them. “It�s hard to strike that right balance of enough and not
enough. Not enough, people get bored. Too many, then they complain
about having to choose between panels. One possibility might be to have
more panels, but repeat some of them. Also, the staggered start and end
times were confusing and usually meant I either had to miss the last part
of one, or the first part of another.��My biggest issue was there was
nowhere that said who was on what panels – so if you were on a panel and
didn’t know what name it was in the program, you couldn’t find it. Also,
if you were looking for someone in particular, no way to find what panel
they might be on so you could find them.�
The fact that this was not a very big con probably explains why the
Friday and Saturday �My First Costume-Con� panels never had more than 5
people in them. We believe they�re still an important panel to have, and
provide an important service to newcomers � especially to let them know
about Hospitality. One of the newbies came all the way from North
Dakota, and we suspect we have a new convert. Very few panels had less
than three attendees: apparently, the panel on how the Library of
Congress is now archiving masquerade video was surprisingly well
attended(!).

Visit Your Group
� Privacy � Unsubscribe � Terms of Use

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2856 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: (NON PROGRAMMING ITEM OF OPINION) (was RE: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review
I like the little shows on Friday night during the Social – it gives new folks a taste of things to come with less pressure plus something to do if they feel awkward at first mingling with a lot of people they don’t know.

BUT – there should be no yelling (maybe a little shushing) and the “event” should be light and no pressure. It’s becoming a little too formal for my taste. It provides a little entertaining break in the Social after which folks can go back to talking and the contestants can join everyone. It really shouldn’t take up tons of time for either the participants or the audience. It should happen fairly early so that the contestants can enjoy some of the evening (and potential food) – maybe a little welcome speech a bit in to the time, followed by a brief show, much socializing, then announcing prizes (delaying the awards gives more time to mingle because some folks will hang around for that) then more socializing.

Nora

EDITED
—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 9:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com

Yours in costuming, Lisa a

PS: (NON PROGRAMMING ITEM OF OPINION)
My personal opinion is I would like to see the Friday ngiht Social go back to being a Social without us having to sit and be quiet while another contest/show is held (and having someone yell at us to be quiet) . I really miss that opening night “Let’s dress up and chill out”
session, and the people who want to enter the contest–I never got a chance to talk to any of them that evening.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2857 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

Regarding the “no ad space for upcoming Costume Cons.” When CC34 contacted someone to inquire about the ad swap (since we got ads in at 32 and 31 for free with the pay-it-forward policy that appears to be in place) we were only cited prices, we were not allowed to have a free ad. The ad prices, on top of that, were astronomical.

I’m sure they were looking to recoup costs anywhere they could, but the ad prices (and consuite prices for that matter) were set at a prohibitive level for anyone but a full-time vendor. Not only that, but we were so taken aback that they were bucking the trend and not giving future CCs free ad space that we noped right on out of there.

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36) were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

 

 

 

 

The two blank pages were a real
waste of space.  The letters from the Co-chairs could have been
photocopied onto the back of the front cover and the Rare Recorded Videos ad
moved up a page, saving a page.  I find it curious that there was no ad
space for any of the upcoming Costume Cons.  I think blank pages would be
better used by including some traceable human figures, one male and one female
and perhaps some info on the upcoming Future Fashion Folio.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2858 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to
different people. Some people know about them, some don’t. Some people
do them, some don’t. If someone tells you to do something because it is
a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

——– Original Message ——–

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36)
were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of
our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would
like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to
allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

 

Group: runacc Message: 2859 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Yes, always double-check. I’d like to believe no one would deliberate mislead you but sometimes people have different “perspectives”.

Nora

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 1:07 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to different people. Some people know about them, some don’t. Some people do them, some don’t. If someone tells you to do something because it is a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

——– Original Message ——–

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36) were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2860 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
A list of these would be a VERY GOOD thing to debate/archive here.  I hadn’t heard of the free ad one, would be nice to have a listing somewhere for potential bids to consider BEFORE they are committed.

~Aurora

 

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yes, always double-check. I’d like to believe no one would deliberate mislead you but sometimes people have different “perspectives”.

Nora

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 1:07 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to different people.  Some people know about them, some don’t.  Some people do them, some don’t.  If someone tells you to do something because it is a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

——– Original Message ——–

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36) were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2861 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

 

This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

 

Byron

 

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

The pre-judging time for the Single Pattern Contest was posted in the “stealth PR”.   At the con, in at least one case, a contestant was told the rehearsal was 2:00 PM.   As it turned out, there did not appear to be a rehearsal and there was some scrambling to get down to the ballroom for judging.   Bottom line: there should have been more announcements about the first competition of the con.  In any case, the show went off without a hitch, other than the MC mispronouncing  titles of entries.  Nora picked up my pre-reg form because I was elsewhere, and she was told that the rehearsal was at 2 PM.  When I found out it was actualy for pre-judging, I had to scramble.   The only notice I found later about the time was in the “stealth PR” #3.    This information should have been announced on the FB page and the D list, like other info.    

Unfortunatlely, the choice for MC was not the best, resulting in awkward pauses and mispronunciations.   Otherwise, the show went off without much of a hitch.

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good thing.  Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftovers of birthday sheetcake for one of the co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good thing.  (It would have been nice if arrangements had been made so that the people backstage didn’t miss out on some of that protein, though).  

Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftover birthday cake for one of the co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

“I liked the free drink ticket.  It would have been nice if there were something worth drinking for free.  Charleston has some fine microbreweries.  I don’t understand not having at least one of them as a choice for a beer.  The food was the same stuff from the con suite.  I have to resurrect a comment from a CC in the past.  Deja Food.  Didn’t I just eat this.  Something that was a little amusing was the drawing they kept trying to have, only to have the person giving out the tickets scream that she was still handing them out.  Perhaps these tickets should have gone in the swag bag, like the drink ticket.  Just a thought.”

There was also this:

“The Friday Night Social was sold as featuring a variety of southern specialties. In reality, there was nothing except cheese trays and peach cobbler..…” (Not strictly true – there were pulled pork sandwiches, and the cobbler, for itself, was excellent)   “…Earlier on Friday, I heard some members suggesting that they could opt to skip dinner; I hope they didn’t do so.” 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2862 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

Courtesy ads go way, way back. Pretty much as far back as when bidding started.

So did forwarding any remaining balance after all expenses to the next three CCs. (That goes back to at least CC14.)
Of course, if the CC isn’t profitable, profit sharing doesn’t happen, but the theory is that there’s no reason to keep the remaining funds because they’re CC specific.
No idea how long the tradition was maintained. At this point I can serve as institutional memory only so far forward.
8(
Betsy

 

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Aurora Celeste auroraceleste@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

A list of these would be a VERY GOOD thing to debate/archive here.  I hadn’t heard of the free ad one, would be nice to have a listing somewhere for potential bids to consider BEFORE they are committed.

~Aurora

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yes, always double-check. I’d like to believe no one would deliberate mislead you but sometimes people have different “perspectives”.

Nora

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 1:07 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to different people.  Some people know about them, some don’t.  Some people do them, some don’t.  If someone tells you to do something because it is a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

——– Original Message ——–

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36) were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

————————————
Posted by: “Nora & Bruce Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/runacc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
runacc-digest@yahoogroups.com
runacc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
runacc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2863 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

As Masquerade Director, I must take serious issue with some of the statements in this review, which are based on faulty information that I pointed out and sought to correct when the review was in draft.  For whatever reasons, the writers did not use the information I provided.

 

First, the review implies that Eric Cannon and Sue Kulinyi made the suggestion, found in the Information for Entrants on the web site, that entrants bring sound in two different media (“They HAD suggested. . . .”).  That is not true.  I made that suggestion.  It was posted in the fall of 2014 (i believe) as part of my original Information for Entrants.  It is the same advice I give for any masquerade I run: if the CD doesn’t work, it is likely that a second CD won’t work either.  Bring the second copy of your sound in a different medium.  See the Information for Entrants for the CC 32 Historical, the Chicon 7 masquerade, and the Anticipation masquerade as examples.
Second, the review implies that I knew on Friday morning that tech was not able to use USB drives and should have taken steps to inform entrants (“it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting was going on Friday”).  That is not correct and I told the authors of the draft that it was not correct.  I did not know of this problem on Friday morning or, indeed, at any time before the beginning of tech rehearsal on Saturday, which was after masquerade registration had closed.
I believe the review should be corrected on these points.
Byron

 

 

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:55 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind)  

For whatever reasons, all the normal tech crews were unavailable for CC33.  Probably , just a case of bad timing.    It was fortunate that Eric and Sue were able to bring at least a barebones tech set up along with their video equipment.    The PR#3 said people could submit their presentation music on either CDs or USB drives.  It turned out, though, there was limited tech – the amount of tech the Cannons could bring was limted by  the space in their car.   Because of that, all MP3 files had to be burned to CDs before they could be played.   They HAD suggested people bring more than one copy on more than one medium, but people may have not have done that, and it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting was going on Friday – this is where the assistant to the MD could have been utilized.    Tech COULD have run WAY behind while the files were burned late in the day Saturday.*

Contestants were told to arrive at the Green Room at 6:00 PM – the GR was not prepared.   It seems they must have started getting organized, because it was 20-30 minutes before they allowed people in.  Not sure why people were only allowed into the somewhat cramped space in running order, and then assigned their den.   

“F/SF was the worst for space. I can’t say for the FFS/Curtains, because I wasn’t back there. Historical was tight, but not as much as F/SF…… The person arriving to do check-in was unpleasant and we had a bit of a snip-fest at the beginning. I was trying to be efficient, and she wanted things HER way.”

“….We didn’t get a running order and # of people per entry until at least 6:30, so we couldn’t set up the dens till then. It helped that the last entry was the 12 body entry, so they got the hall kind of by default. There was no way to put them in the room.”

This made for a longer delay.   That’s really inefficient, especially when they were already running late.*    The contestants had to repeat their info to different people, even though they were right next to each other – probably a noise AND organization issue.  

The dens were poorly set up with chairs in an oval, with no tables  – there was no space.   The contestants were told they could not use more than one seat, so where were they supposed to put the stuff they brought down?  Guess no one had thought of that.   One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.    

“Some entries wouldn’t have fit into the quilt room.  We were already having issues with exit doors – apparently the fire marshal was there and was being picky about stuff blocking the doors.”

“…we were having to steal chairs from the audience because there weren’t enough in the green room for everyone.”

“In hindsight, for F/SF, we really needed to swap the spaces of two of the dens (and put Santa into the corner). That giant costume kept sticking out into the only path for movement we had and catching every dangly bit that went by.”
 

The den moms were given hats to wear to identify them, but apparently, no one actually mentioned that.   Guess it was supposed to be assumed.   The den moms were not informed to make sure people got to the official photographer – at least not initially.    The GR ran out of water at some point.   It DID have a repair kit, and it was used.  

Official Photography took up about ¼ of the space that could have been used for Green Room, but there was no where else to really put it.   

“I don’t think there was really anyplace else for the photographers to go other than in that room – the partitions were kind of arbitrary, so yes, it was 1/3 of the space. “

 The judges were not photographed as part of the official record – not sure who would have been responsible for making sure that happened. 

Workmanship judges were placed at the end of the main hall where the audience could potentially see them before the show – no attempt to curtain that area off was made (probably because it wasn’t really thought about until the last minute).  

It was obvious that the con had some staffing issues, since the GR Director was also shooting the reference photos, as well as having been working Registration each day.  Unfortunately, her assistant was apparently not very experienced at the GR check in process.    There was also a shortage of backstage crew, with only 3 ninjas ( I stepped in to help). 

The photo run ran without a problem, and the judges returned shortly after the video halftime. (The Workmanship judging panel had taken a little longer to complete deliberations).   Overall, less time might have been taken had the printing of awards started immediately after the Presentation judges had finished, rather than waiting for the Workmanship results.   It was apparently a bit of a “duh’ moment.   Regardless, awards were fair, there were enough people recognized for their efforts, and there were no controversies.

 

Just on recommendation here, that I remember: aprons instead of hats, and hand fans.  

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2864 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

 

I stand corrected, and y’know, I even saw that on the website.   I guess I thought that was written by someone other than you.   My apologies.

 

As for the second point, I reread your email, and I can’t corroborate whether the knowledge was available or not, so I bow to your version of the story.   I overlooked your correction while copying and pasting a new document.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 6:32 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

As Masquerade Director, I must take serious issue with some of the statements in this review, which are based on faulty information that I pointed out and sought to correct when the review was in draft.  For whatever reasons, the writers did not use the information I provided.

First, the review implies that Eric Cannon and Sue Kulinyi made the suggestion, found in the Information for Entrants on the web site, that entrants bring sound in two different media (“They HAD suggested. . . .”).  That is not true.  I made that suggestion.  It was posted in the fall of 2014 (i believe) as part of my original Information for Entrants.  It is the same advice I give for any masquerade I run: if the CD doesn’t work, it is likely that a second CD won’t work either.  Bring the second copy of your sound in a different medium.  See the Information for Entrants for the CC 32 Historical, the Chicon 7 masquerade, and the Anticipation masquerade as examples.

Second, the review implies that I knew on Friday morning that tech was not able to use USB drives and should have taken steps to inform entrants (“it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting was going on Friday”).  That is not correct and I told the authors of the draft that it was not correct.  I did not know of this problem on Friday morning or, indeed, at any time before the beginning of tech rehearsal on Saturday, which was after masquerade registration had closed.

I believe the review should be corrected on these points.

Byron

 

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:55 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind)  

 

For whatever reasons, all the normal tech crews were unavailable for CC33.  Probably , just a case of bad timing.    It was fortunate that Eric and Sue were able to bring at least a barebones tech set up along with their video equipment.    The PR#3 said people could submit their presentation music on either CDs or USB drives.  It turned out, though, there was limited tech – the amount of tech the Cannons could bring was limted by  the space in their car.   Because of that, all MP3 files had to be burned to CDs before they could be played.   They HAD suggested people bring more than one copy on more than one medium, but people may have not have done that, and it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting was going on Friday – this is where the assistant to the MD could have been utilized.    Tech COULD have run WAY behind while the files were burned late in the day Saturday.*

 

Contestants were told to arrive at the Green Room at 6:00 PM – the GR was not prepared.   It seems they must have started getting organized, because it was 20-30 minutes before they allowed people in.  Not sure why people were only allowed into the somewhat cramped space in running order, and then assigned their den.   

 

“F/SF was the worst for space. I can’t say for the FFS/Curtains, because I wasn’t back there. Historical was tight, but not as much as F/SF…… The person arriving to do check-in was unpleasant and we had a bit of a snip-fest at the beginning. I was trying to be efficient, and she wanted things HER way.”

 

“….We didn’t get a running order and # of people per entry until at least 6:30, so we couldn’t set up the dens till then. It helped that the last entry was the 12 body entry, so they got the hall kind of by default. There was no way to put them in the room.”

 

This made for a longer delay.   That’s really inefficient, especially when they were already running late.*    The contestants had to repeat their info to different people, even though they were right next to each other – probably a noise AND organization issue.  

 

The dens were poorly set up with chairs in an oval, with no tables  – there was no space.   The contestants were told they could not use more than one seat, so where were they supposed to put the stuff they brought down?  Guess no one had thought of that.   One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.    

 

“Some entries wouldn’t have fit into the quilt room.  We were already having issues with exit doors – apparently the fire marshal was there and was being picky about stuff blocking the doors.”

 

“…we were having to steal chairs from the audience because there weren’t enough in the green room for everyone.”

 

“In hindsight, for F/SF, we really needed to swap the spaces of two of the dens (and put Santa into the corner). That giant costume kept sticking out into the only path for movement we had and catching every dangly bit that went by.”

 

The den moms were given hats to wear to identify them, but apparently, no one actually mentioned that.   Guess it was supposed to be assumed.   The den moms were not informed to make sure people got to the official photographer – at least not initially.    The GR ran out of water at some point.   It DID have a repair kit, and it was used.  

 

Official Photography took up about ¼ of the space that could have been used for Green Room, but there was no where else to really put it.   

 

“I don’t think there was really anyplace else for the photographers to go other than in that room – the partitions were kind of arbitrary, so yes, it was 1/3 of the space. “

 

 The judges were not photographed as part of the official record – not sure who would have been responsible for making sure that happened. 

 

Workmanship judges were placed at the end of the main hall where the audience could potentially see them before the show – no attempt to curtain that area off was made (probably because it wasn’t really thought about until the last minute).  

 

It was obvious that the con had some staffing issues, since the GR Director was also shooting the reference photos, as well as having been working Registration each day.  Unfortunately, her assistant was apparently not very experienced at the GR check in process.    There was also a shortage of backstage crew, with only 3 ninjas ( I stepped in to help). 

 

The photo run ran without a problem, and the judges returned shortly after the video halftime. (The Workmanship judging panel had taken a little longer to complete deliberations).   Overall, less time might have been taken had the printing of awards started immediately after the Presentation judges had finished, rather than waiting for the Workmanship results.   It was apparently a bit of a “duh’ moment.   Regardless, awards were fair, there were enough people recognized for their efforts, and there were no controversies.

 

Just on recommendation here, that I remember: aprons instead of hats, and hand fans.  

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2865 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

 

 

I’m not sure how you’re seeing that, but when we received the email from the Yahoo group, I did not see that repetition you cited.   And I just went out to the Yahoo site to look at the email and there is no repetition, there,  either.   Could be a browser thing on your end.   Or some weird coding in the background.   Rather than the usual writing to the list from our PC, I was going directly out to Yahoo from my laptop, creating a new email. and pasting in my text.     Maybe something didn’t get erased after I edited it that was “invisible”   Yahoo can be squirrely.   May not like my pasting from a Word doc.  I have no control over that.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

Byron

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2866 From: Elaine Sims Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 REview – Historical

 

A note on the awards for the quilt & doll shows: I fully
expected to do the presenting well before the judges arrived. I was
approached by … I think it was Sue, as well as second ‘in-charge’
to ask if I was ready with my awards (for the quilt show). I
confirmed to both that yes, I was ready, and that I also had the
doll show ones, since Ann was busy ninja-ing for the masquerade. I
had my judges ready to go, and fully expected to be called up within
5-10 minutes. Then we waited. And waited. And things got really
confusing when the Historical judges returned, and we hadn’t been
given the opportunity to take our 5 minutes to get them out.

~Elaine2

On 06/06/2015 07:10 PM,
casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:

 

 

 

 

Prejudging
took
place in the Green Room again, with the distractions
of Tech Rehearsals.  There were only
10 entries in the show, so
again – good thing it was a small con.*

 

An
opportunity was missed to keep the judges corralled
and also allow them
additional time for discussion by arranging for them
to have dinner
together.   This worked at CC31.

 

The Green
Room was the same size, but the contestants took up
just about as much room
because of 9 people with wings, among other things.
There was only one noticeable tech snag.
Again, the feeling by people was the awards
were in adequate numbers, fair and again, no
controversies.   Some of the
contestants were surprised and
pleased to be recognized.   At
halftime,
the quilt and doll awards announcements could have
been done before the judges
got back.

Recommendation:
Make
sure to allow time for judges to change to
costumes before the show – your costumes are the
creds on your back.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2867 From: costumrs Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

 

No, Sandy and I are seeing it too.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From: “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 06/07/2015 9:37 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

 

I’m not sure how you’re seeing that, but when we received the email from the Yahoo group, I did not see that repetition you cited.   And I just went out to the Yahoo site to look at the email and there is no repetition, there,  either.   Could be a browser thing on your end.   Or some weird coding in the background.   Rather than the usual writing to the list from our PC, I was going directly out to Yahoo from my laptop, creating a new email. and pasting in my text.     Maybe something didn’t get erased after I edited it that was “invisible”   Yahoo can be squirrely.   May not like my pasting from a Word doc.  I have no control over that.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

Byron

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2868 From: axejudge Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

Byron is not the only one seeing double, Bruce.  I am also, both at my work computer and at home.

Karen

 

 

On 2015-06-08 02:37, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:

 

 

I’m not sure how you’re seeing that, but when we received the email from the Yahoo group, I did not see that repetition you cited.   And I just went out to the Yahoo site to look at the email and there is no repetition, there,  either.   Could be a browser thing on your end.   Or some weird coding in the background.   Rather than the usual writing to the list from our PC, I was going directly out to Yahoo from my laptop, creating a new email. and pasting in my text.     Maybe something didn’t get erased after I edited it that was “invisible”   Yahoo can be squirrely.   May not like my pasting from a Word doc.  I have no control over that.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

Byron

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2869 From: Les Roth Date: 6/7/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

 

I’ve been seeing the same duplications that Byron and possibly others are seeing. I’m reading the posts in my email on a Mac.

 

 

Les

Live, never to be ashamed if everything you do is published around the

world. Even if what is published is not true. — Richard Bach

 

 

On Jun 7, 2015, at 9:37 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’m not sure how you’re seeing that, but when we received the email from the Yahoo group, I did not see that repetition you cited.   And I just went out to the Yahoo site to look at the email and there is no repetition, there,  either.   Could be a browser thing on your end.   Or some weird coding in the background.   Rather than the usual writing to the list from our PC, I was going directly out to Yahoo from my laptop, creating a new email. and pasting in my text.     Maybe something didn’t get erased after I edited it that was “invisible”   Yahoo can be squirrely.   May not like my pasting from a Word doc.  I have no control over that.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night



This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

Byron

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2870 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review postings

 

 

Okay, then it’s definitely a coding issue.   No more copying and pasting directly into Yahoo, then.

I’ll work on reposting the entire thing, for readability, plus corrections, as soon as I can.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2871 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review postings

Copy/Paste from Word (I assume) to Notepad, should remove any background
formatting, then Copy/Paste to Yahoo!.

Michael

On 2015-06-08 05:17, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
wrote:

> Okay, then it’s definitely a coding issue. No more copying and pasting
> directly into Yahoo, then.
>
> I’ll work on reposting the entire thing, for readability, plus
> corrections, as soon as I can.

> Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2872 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

YES I’m with Aurora, it’s probably a good idea to make a list of everything that is, at least by a majority of past/future CC-runners, agreed to be a typical function, tradition, etc. So that, at the very least, if someone chooses to buck tradition, it’s a conscious choice and not because they were ill-informed.

For example, one has just come up for us due to these reviews. Rosanna was looking over the description of the program book and wondered if it’s tradition – or even required – to publish the Constitution in the program book. We had not heard or conceived of that, and while it might have eventually come up when we looked at past program books to determine the best format and content for ours, it’s better to find out about it now.

Passing seed money to future CCs is one we know well about. The required programming/events per the Constitution, also clearly know. It’s less about the things that are written down already and more about the assumed traditions, like free ad space.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <auroraceleste@…> wrote :

A list of these would be a VERY GOOD thing to debate/archive here.  I hadn’t heard of the free ad one, would be nice to have a listing somewhere for potential bids to consider BEFORE they are committed.

~Aurora

 

 

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@… [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yes, always double-check. I’d like to believe no one would deliberate mislead you but sometimes people have different “perspectives”.

Nora

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 1:07 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to different people.  Some people know about them, some don’t.  Some people do them, some don’t.  If someone tells you to do something because it is a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2873 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

 

 

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:34 AM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For example, one has just come up for us due to these reviews. Rosanna was looking over the description of the program book and wondered if it’s tradition – or even required – to publish the Constitution in the program book. We had not heard or conceived of that, and while it might have eventually come up when we looked at past program books to determine the best format and content for ours, it’s better to find out about it now.

That one is easy: it’s in the CC Constitution:

1.2.2 Responsibilities

Each Costume-Con conference committee shall be responsible for its own bookkeeping, finances, and taxes.

Each Costume-Con conference committee shall be responsible for enforcing the provisions of this ConStitution. Each Costume-Con conference shall distribute a copy of the Costume-Con ConStitution to all of its members, typically by publishing it in the Program Book. [Renumbered Saturday, January 04, 2003.]

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2874 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Courtesy ads go way, way back. Pretty much as far back as when bidding started.

 

At least offering cheaper ad rates to non-profits than you do to commercial businesses is pretty traditional, and not just at CC.
Offering comp ads for the upcoming conventions and all bids being voted at your convention is just plain smart. It’s not likely to be more than 4 pages…

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2875 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Byron

 

I’m __,_._,
I’m getting some scrambled text on some messages. Gmail, on web on Windows, and in a client on Android and iPad.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2876 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

What Andy said. Might I recommend that everyone who’s associated with a current con or bid take the time to actually read the ConStitution? After all, we wrote it to keep institutional stuff that shouldn’t change from year to year. It should be your first go-to, before this mailing list,  even.

My not so humble opinion. YMMV.

 

On Jun 8, 2015 1:46 PM, “Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Courtesy ads go way, way back. Pretty much as far back as when bidding started.

 

At least offering cheaper ad rates to non-profits than you do to commercial businesses is pretty traditional, and not just at CC.
Offering comp ads for the upcoming conventions and all bids being voted at your convention is just plain smart. It’s not likely to be more than 4 pages…

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2877 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions

In the CC25 program book, I published it at a 6pt font for the body of
the Constitution and 10pt for the contact information. It took 4 pages
which also had a sidebar column on the outside for other information.

Michael

On 2015-06-08 10:38, Kevin Roche kevin@twistedimage.com [runacc] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:34 AM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc]
> <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>> For example, one has just come up for us due to these reviews.
>> Rosanna was looking over the description of the program book and
>> wondered if it’s tradition – or even required – to publish the
>> Constitution in the program book. We had not heard or conceived of
>> that, and while it might have eventually come up when we looked at
>> past program books to determine the best format and content for
>> ours, it’s better to find out about it now.
>
> That one is easy: it’s in the CC Constitution:
>
> 1.2.2 RESPONSIBILITIES
>
> Each Costume-Con conference committee shall be responsible for its own
> bookkeeping, finances, and taxes.
>
> Each Costume-Con conference committee shall be responsible for
> enforcing the provisions of this ConStitution. Each Costume-Con
> conference shall distribute a copy of the Costume-Con ConStitution to
> all of its members, typically by publishing it in the Program Book.
> [Renumbered Saturday, January 04, 2003.]
>
>
>
> ————————-
> Posted by: Kevin Roche <kevin@twistedimage.com>
> ————————-

 

Group: runacc Message: 2878 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review postings

 

If you copy it and paste it into “notepad” first it will remove the excess formatting. 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:17:02 -0500
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review postings

 

 

Okay, then it’s definitely a coding issue.   No more copying and pasting directly into Yahoo, then.

I’ll work on reposting the entire thing, for readability, plus corrections, as soon as I can.

Bruce

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2879 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 


Posted by: casamai@sbcglobal.net

It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind) 

One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.
———————————————————————————————————

In regards to CC32—
The plan had always been to curtain off the 60’x20′ section of the Foyer/prefunction space aka. “hall” at CC32 as part of the flexible greenroom function space. See map here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/18615679341/in/dateposted-public/

We had total
30′ x 60′ Ambrosia
19′ x 25′ Spartan
19′ x 25′ Northern Spy -and-
20′ x 60′ Foyer
For a total flexible Greenroom space of 4045sq ft space.

Given the size of the previous Toronto Costume-Con, and guessing maximum space need based on the attendance numbers/space usage of the quite large CC26 (who’s greenroom was 71′ x 33′ and they used a bit of the hall as well), in general that seemed reasonable at the time.
I’m sorry if you felt it was disastrous that a den had to be in the “hall”* (again an actual dedicated greenroom space.)

By the time it was clear CC32 was going to be enormous we had no way of moving to a larger space.

My apologies to any contestants or staff who’s experience was ruined by this set up.
Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2880 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

 

The point is that CC32 had to set up in the hall because there were so many entries; CC33 only had 20 some entries in the FSF (11 in Historical) with a lot of solos and only a couple of groups.

The green room was very small (of course it was a small con) not even big enough for a really small masq.

 

I think everyone was well aware of the sheer number of contestants in Toronto and that much space filled up fast.

 

Nora

 


 

Posted by: casamai@sbcglobal.net
It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind)

One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.
———————————————————————————————————


In regards to CC32—
The plan had always been to curtain off the 60’x20′ section of the Foyer/prefunction space aka. “hall” at CC32 as part of the flexible greenroom function space. See map here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/18615679341/in/dateposted-public/

 

We had total

30′ x 60′ Ambrosia

19′ x 25′ Spartan

19′ x 25′ Northern Spy -and-

20′ x 60′ Foyer

 

For a total flexible Greenroom space of 4045sq ft space.

Given the size of the previous Toronto Costume-Con, and guessing maximum space need based on the attendance numbers/space usage of the quite large CC26 (who’s greenroom was 71′ x 33′ and they used a bit of the hall as well), in general that seemed reasonable at the time.
I’m sorry if you felt it was disastrous that ! a den had to be in the “hall”* (again an actual dedicated greenroom space.)

By the time it was clear CC32 was going to be enormous we had no way of moving to a larger space.


My apologies to any contestants or staff who’s experience was ruined by this set up.
Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2881 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

What do the asterisks at the end of those sentences indicate?

 

Byron

 

 

On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:15 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 


Posted by: casamai@sbcglobal.net




It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind) 



One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.   
———————————————————————————————————


In regards to CC32—
The plan had always been to curtain off the 60’x20′ section of the Foyer/prefunction space aka. “hall” at CC32 as part of the flexible greenroom function space. See map here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/18615679341/in/dateposted-public/

We had total
30′ x 60′ Ambrosia
19′ x 25′ Spartan
19′ x 25′ Northern Spy -and-
20′ x 60′ Foyer
For a total flexible Greenroom space of 4045sq ft space.

Given the size of the previous Toronto Costume-Con, and guessing maximum space need based on the attendance numbers/space usage of the quite large CC26 (who’s greenroom was 71′ x 33′ and they used a bit of the hall as well), in general that seemed reasonable at the time. 
I’m sorry if you felt it was disastrous that a den had to be in the “hall”* (again an actual dedicated greenroom space.)
By the time it was clear CC32 was going to be enormous we had no way of moving to a larger space.


My apologies to any contestants or staff who’s experience was ruined by this set up.
Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2882 From: ECM Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

 

Very true.  However, ad sharing is not just done between CCs, but between CCs & other local and regional cons.  It’s not just a tradition, it’s a good marketing device that costs everyone nothing.

Elaine
CC30


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 12:07:12 -0600
Subject: [runacc] CC Traditions WAS: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

 

I discovered that there are many things that a CC “traditions” to
different people. Some people know about them, some don’t. Some people
do them, some don’t. If someone tells you to do something because it is
a tradition, ask around.

Michael
CC31

——– Original Message ——–

Now, if there were signals crossed and we (and 35, and the bid for 36)
were supposed to get free ads but that was not communicated to any of
our committees…well, that’s a different issue entirely. CC34 would
like to assure that future CCs will be accommodated as per tradition, to
allow them the best opportunities to hook attendees.

Stace
secretary, CC34

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2883 From: ECM Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

 

As the reviewer stated, “Unfortunatlely, the choice for MC was not the best, resulting in awkward pauses and mispronunciations.”  Carl chose his own way to present the entrants.  He never belittled or demeaned anyone other than himself – purposely – and aimed for comedy.  And he has promised to never MC again.

Elaine
My choice, mea culpa.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 18:13:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

 

This is another review that needed editing.  The material beginning “As for the Social. . .” and ending “. . . not down too low,” appears twice.

Byron

 

On Jun 6, 2015, at 9:32 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

The pre-judging time for the Single Pattern Contest was posted in the “stealth PR”.   At the con, in at least one case, a contestant was told the rehearsal was 2:00 PM.   As it turned out, there did not appear to be a rehearsal and there was some scrambling to get down to the ballroom for judging.   Bottom line: there should have been more announcements about the first competition of the con.  In any case, the show went off without a hitch, other than the MC mispronouncing  titles of entries.  Nora picked up my pre-reg form because I was elsewhere, and she was told that the rehearsal was at 2 PM.  When I found out it was actualy for pre-judging, I had to scramble.   The only notice I found later about the time was in the “stealth PR” #3.    This information should have been announced on the FB page and the D list, like other info.

Unfortunatlely, the choice for MC was not the best, resulting in awkward pauses and mispronunciations.   Otherwise, the show went off without much of a hitch.

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good thing.  Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftovers of birthday sheetcake for one of the co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good thing.  (It would have been nice if arrangements had been made so that the people backstage didn’t miss out on some of that protein, though).  

Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftover birthday cake for one of the co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

“I liked the free drink ticket.  It would have been nice if there were something worth drinking for free.  Charleston has some fine microbreweries.  I don’t understand not having at least one of them as a choice for a beer.  The food was the same stuff from the con suite.  I have to resurrect a comment from a CC in the past.  Deja Food.  Didn’t I just eat this.  Something that was a little amusing was the drawing they kept trying to have, only to have the person giving out the tickets scream that she was still handing them out.  Perhaps these tickets should have gone in the swag bag, like the drink ticket.  Just a thought.”

There was also this:

“The Friday Night Social was sold as featuring a variety of southern specialties. In reality, there was nothing except cheese trays and peach cobbler..…” (Not strictly true – there were pulled pork sandwiches, and the cobbler, for itself, was excellent)   “…Earlier on Friday, I heard some members suggesting that they could opt to skip dinner; I hope they didn’t do so.” 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2884 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade‏

 

“What do the asterisks at the end of those sentences indicate?”

Byron
__________________________________________________
Don’t know, they’re not mine, they are clipped from the original text in the review.
– Dawn

Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review –

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2885 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

 

add” had the various! shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous “. after the asterisk.

 

Guess I wasn’t clear enough.   Wouldn’t be the first time, nor will it be the last.

 

Bruce

 

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 6:27 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

What do the asterisks at the end of those sentences indicate?

Byron

 

On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:15 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 


 

Posted by: casamai@sbcglobal.net

It will be a recurring theme that, had the various! shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind) 

One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.
———————————————————————————————————


In regards to CC32—
The plan had always been to curtain off the 60’x20′ section of the Foyer/prefunction space aka. “hall” at CC32 as part of the flexible greenroom function space. See map here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/18615679341/in/dateposted-public/

 

We had total

30′ x 60′ Ambrosia

19′ x 25′ Spartan

19′ x 25′ Northern S! py -and-

20′ x 60′ Foyer

 

For a total flexible Greenroom space of 4045sq ft space.

Given the size of the previous Toronto Costume-Con, and guessing maximum space need based on the attendance numbers/space usage of the quite large CC26 (who’s greenroom was 71′ x 33′ and they used a bit of the hall as well), in general that seemed reasonable at the time. 
I’m sorry if you felt it was disastrous that a den had to be in the “hall”* (again an actual dedicated greenroom space.)

By the time it was clear CC32 was going to be enormous we had no way of moving to a larger space.


My apologies to any contestants or staff who’s experience was ruined by this set up.
Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2886 From: casamai Date: 6/9/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc

(This is a test of copying and pasting from Notepad – let me know if still doesn’t work)

 

So, time one again for a review of the most recent Costume-Con.   Our group likes to thoroughly analyze a con in anticipation of the next one.  We discuss what we liked and didn’t like and then I bring it here to add to the runacc list “knowledge base”, spark discussion and hopefully help future organizers avoid common mistakes.   These are merely our opinions, and observations made not just based on what was experienced as convention attendees, but also convention veterans who have run a CC and/or have served on multiple concoms.   By no means are our opinions the “final word”, but we’ve been told we’re generally accurate and always an interesting read.

 

This year’s CC was in stark contrast to last year’s CC32 record attendance.  We can’t help but believe that this was partly due to frequent and different breakdowns of communication at both the staff and convention interaction level.  Granted, some of the problems were beyond the concom’s control, but many problems could have been easily avoided.

 

Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate.  As near as we can tell, there appeared to be a great reliance on word of mouth to bring in new members.   This opinion is based on what appeared to be a low newbie to veteran ratio.      A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of people within a 300 mile radius of the host city.   Yet, when we got to the con, it  looked to us as though there were very few locals or regional people.   It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s.  That was nice in some ways, because we got to see some friends we only see once a year, but it’s also not good.

 

As near as we can tell, it was expected that people should go out to the convention website to get most any information.  That’s where the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were found.  The convention website was updated infrequently, and sometimes was missing info.    At times, it was a struggle for some staff to get it updated, even when the webmaster was notified.

(Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com site does not update for the next year’s countdown.  Not sure how that works, but maybe it ought to just put it out of its misery and use the .org site.   It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)

Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet,  the CC33 FB page was underutilized.  No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other forums (although, this may be less important these days).  The CC33 Facebook page could have been used to get news out – but that didn’t really happen until around December last year – that’s in the three years between the site selection and the event.  The rest of the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers or tourist stuff about Charleston.

 

We’ve said this in the past – con committees should have a “communications officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up with content and be comfortable with social media.    So far, CC34 has been making some efforts – they’ve even been producing some online promotional video content.

 

Progress Reports:  As near as we can tell, it was never announced when each one was posted to the website.   Not on the FB page, not on the D list – nowhere.   Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered?

Recommendations for future concoms:

 

Make greater use of social media, especially, when trying to reach new members.

Have a staffer whose specific task is to come up with content – preferably someone not doing anything else major at the con, either.   They should function as sort of a newsletter editor, constantly looking for content to post.   They should build up a store of news items from the major department heads that they can “squirt out” every so often.   Either that, or have the event heads be sure to post something of interest every so often.   Many people are not familiar with CC – put some factoids out there, so that new people aren’t coming in not knowing what to expect.

 

BROADCAST INFO OVER ALL PLATFORMS: Twitter, FB, the website, the ICG-D list, etc.   Don’t ignore any opportunities to promote anything new and get people talking, and don’t favor one platform over another.

Have staffers on Facebook share any posts off the convention FB page.   This way, you’re not only reaching those who follow the page, but it also broadcasts it to all their friends who may only be on the fringe of the costuming community.  Staffers should also invite their FB friends to Like the convention FB page.  Also, find and join costuming related FB pages so you can share info about CC.   In recent talks with the CC34 staff, it’s been determined that communications among cosplayers has decentralized, and now there are FB pages dedicated to the regions or venues where they are most likely to attend.   As an example, “STL Cosplayers Unite” (St. Louis area) has 621 members.   There are lots of Steampunk groups out there that should be investigated, too.  Don’t forget that huge following of people on the Historical clothing Yahoo Group, either.   Did you know there is a specific FB page  called the “Future Fashion Design Center”?

 

CC34 has come up with some really nice full color post card sized flyers.   These seem to work better than the old school 8″x10″ ones these days, and are more eye-catching   They’re also not as expensive to print as they use to be.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2887 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/9/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc
No repetition of paragraphs that I saw. Just some extra blank lines
between paragraphs.

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 2888 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/10/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc
Well, when my copy came through, it was all at least evenly spaced between the paragraphs.

Bruce

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 9:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Pre-con info – Archival doc

No repetition of paragraphs that I saw. Just some extra blank lines between paragraphs.

Michael

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2889 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/15/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality – Archival doc

 

 

This publication, distributed prior to the convention will be recorded as one of the worst in the convention’s history.    As near as we can tell, there must have been a heavy reliance on the convention regulars and tradition to get the word out about it, because the only evidence we can find of promotion was on the website and 1 email back in July.   There may have been promoting  elsewhere on other lists they belong to, but FB and the ICG-D list are the primary forums for reaching a majority of the potential attendees.   The only content found about the rules for the Folio were on the website and PR #2.

This  lack of promotion HAD to have been a factor in the serious lag in submissions, resulting in the submission deadline being pushed back at least once.   Some people didn’t know about the extension because that announcement was not made widely.

While selecting judges from 3 different time zones might be doable these days, thanks to the Internet, there were coordination difficulties.  The Editor insisted on routing only one set of the submissions to one judge at a time, rather than providing  them to all three simultaneously.    Once the judges had all finally made their own reviews, they supposedly Skyped to confer.  This process, and then the time taken for publication, took until late February.

The con chairs should have been monitoring the situation and either replaced the Editor  or advised them to come up with a better solution like finding local judges in their area.  However, because one of the con chairs had their own health issues, thus their co-chair/spouse was distracted.

Finally, the link to the finished Folio was sent out on March 6 – less than 10 weeks from the convention.    There was no announcement on the D list, no announcement on the FB page.   There should have been a greater effort to get the word out about it – people are lazy and won’t seek it out.  And once the link was sent, not everyone could open the PDF file.

As for the content of the Folio, while there was a claim that there were “so many designs”, there were only 5 designers, with only 96 published pages, which included some blanks to assure that it would print out formatted correctly.

The recognition system of “you’re either in the Folio or not” was discarded in favor of 1st, 2nd and 3rd places and people didn’t like it.   Even when the Folio finally came out, most of the designs left people uninspired – we heard this from several people at the con, not just our own people.   (Maybe this is a panel for the next CC – can design be taught?)    Many of the designs were too complicated to be able to be completed in the short amount of time left.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2890 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/16/2015
Subject: Arrrrgh! Apologies!

 

 

I can’t stand it.   I had two emails open and intended to make sure I stayed in order.   I apparently got confused.   I’ll try that again later.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2891 From: von_drago Date: 6/16/2015
Subject: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook

Anyone running a Folio or Folio show for the next several CCs might want to check out this FB page. Created by Cat Devereaux and I’m one of the admins so if someone after CC34 was interested in posting things – it’s a great form of easy communication.

 

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 2892 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/17/2015
Subject: Re: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook

Did that page replace her website, or is that still a resource as well?

Michael

On 2015-06-16 20:01, von_drago@yahoo.com [runacc] wrote:
> Anyone running a Folio or Folio show for the next several CCs might
> want to check out this FB page. Created by Cat Devereaux and I’m one
> of the admins so if someone after CC34 was interested in posting
> things – it’s a great form of easy communication.
>
> Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 2893 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/17/2015
Subject: Re: Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook

No, her sites are still viable too.

Nora

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:58 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Future Fashion Design Center on Facebook

Did that page replace her website, or is that still a resource as well?

Michael

On 2015-06-16 20:01, von_drago@yahoo.com [runacc] wrote:
> Anyone running a Folio or Folio show for the next several CCs might
> want to check out this FB page. Created by Cat Devereaux and I’m one
> of the admins so if someone after CC34 was interested in posting
> things – it’s a great form of easy communication.
>
> Nora

————————————
Posted by: bruno@soulmasque.com
————————————

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
————————————

Yahoo Groups Links

 

Group: runacc Message: 2894 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Future Fashion Folio – Archival doc

 

 

This publication, distributed prior to the convention will be recorded as one of the worst in the convention’s history.    As near as we can tell, they must have been relying on the convention regulars and tradition to get the word out about it, because the only evidence we can find of promotion was on the website and 1 email back in July last year.   They may have been promoting  elsewhere on other lists they belong to, but FB and the ICG-D list are the primary forums for reaching a majority of the potential attendees.   The only content found about the rules for the Folio were on the website and PR #2.

This  lack of promotion HAD to have been a factor in the serious lag in submissions, resulting in the deadline being pushed back at least once.   Some people didn’t know about the extension because that announcement was not made widely.

While selecting judges from 3 different time zones might be doable these days, thanks to the Internet, there were coordination difficulties.  They also insisted on routing only one set of the submissions to one judge at a time, rather than providing  them to all three simultaneously.    Once the judges had all finally made their own reviews, they supposedly Skyped to confer.  This process, and then the time taken for publication, took until late February.

The con chairs should have been monitoring the situation and either replaced the Editor  or advised them to come up with a better solution like finding local judges in their area.  However, because one of the con chairs had their own health issues, thus their co-chair/spouse was distracted.

Finally, the link to the finished Folio was sent out on March 6 – less than 10 weeks from the convention.    There was no announcement on the D list, no announcement on the FB page.   There should have been a greater effort to get the word out about it – people are lazy and won’t seek it out.  And once the link was sent, not everyone could open the PDF.

As for the content of the Folio, while there was a claim that there were “so many designs” – there were only 5 designers, with only 96 published pages.   The published Folio was only 96 pages, which included some blanks to assure that it would print out formatted correctly.

The recognition system of “you’re either in the Folio or not” was discarded in favor of 1st, 2nd and 3rd places and people didn’t like it.   Even when the Folio finally came out, most of the designs left people uninspired – we heard this from several people at the con, not just our own people.   (Maybe this is a panel for the next CC – can design be taught?)    Many of the designs were too complicated to be able to be completed in the short amount of time left.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2895 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hotel – Archival doc

 

 

Many different opinions and experiences with the hotel.  It was certainly convenient to get to.   FREE PARKING(!).   The worst thing we had was Housekeeping was sometimes a little slow delivering supplies.   The elevators were quick.   The staff was all mostly friendly.   We didn’t see the amount of wear others saw.

The hotel food was not bad, the prices typical for the area.   But not everyone had the same experiences.

“I didn’t particularly care for the attitude of the staff in the restaurant.  “We’re usually not open for lunch, we’re just doing this for your group.”  Said with a kind of put-out tone of voice.  That really put me off the place so we never ate there again.” 

 

Another commenter:

“Restaurant was OK for breakfast. It was nice to be able to pay for the buffet in advance so we could just leave when we were done, rather than waiting forever for the check. We only ate there once for dinner (time crunch) and the buffet fare was definitely not worth the $18 price. Staff was OK for us. We don’t usually eat lunch at a con, so didn’t encounter the lunch problem.”

 

While there were no restaurants within walking distance, there were several within 5 minutes driving time.   Supposedly, the hotel shuttle would take you anywhere you wanted to go within a 3 mile radius for free.  There was also one that would take you downtown, to the visitor’s bureau.   There was no hot tub, but there was an indoor/outdoor pool.    Perhaps hot tubs are not as big a thing in the South?

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2896 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration – Archival doc

 

 

At least some registration stuff was there to pick up Thursday evening, but there was apparently some miscommunication about giving out the complete packets, so some of people had to pick up the rest the next day.

This one really confused me. The swag bags were ready. I know. I stuffed them all on Tuesday night. I’m not sure why they weren’t available Thursday night.

There were not enough people to man Registration and we saw one person who appeared to be spending an awful lot of time behind the table.  This seemed to be a recurring indicator that the con was understaffed.

To us the “swag bag” was not much to write home about.  There was no map of the hotel, but the layout was relatively simple and the few meeting rooms used were all together in one place, save for a board room on the third floor (which was hard to find at first until someone posted a handwritten sign).

The program book was minimal at best and had a number of errors, mostly regarding info about the panels (missing descriptions or no description at all in one or two cases). 

The program book broke down as follows:

32 pages including front cover. 

2 blank pages (inside of front cover and front side of back page). 

No back cover. 

Letter from con chairs 1 page. 

Panel descriptions 3 pages, some of which had no description in the program book.

Harassment Policy: 2 pages

Bios – 6 pages

Ads – 3 pages, two half page ads and 2 full page ads

Costume Con Constitution – 9 pages

Other articles – 6 pages (Miss Lizzy’s Travelling Historical Fashion Show, Astronaut Quilt, Richard Man: Transformations: Cosplay, List of past CostumeCons).

The two blank pages were a real waste of space.  The letters from the Co-chairs could have been photocopied onto the back of the front cover and the Rare Recorded Videos ad moved up a page, saving a page.  I find it curious that there was no ad space for any of the upcoming Costume Cons.  I think blank pages would be better used by including some traceable human figures, one male and one female and perhaps some info on the upcoming Future Fashion Folio.

 

The list of past CostumeCons was nice and would have made the Con Chair’s toast at the dead dog party a lot easier, if there had been a dead dog party.

 

Local GuideNot quite as helpful as one would have liked.  We actually needed to find the Walmart listed on the guide.  It took a lot of driving around on the other side of the highway.  There are lots of signs there claiming the presence of a Walmart, but none of them point you in the proper direction.  A simple hand drawn map would have cleared all that up.  Another thing lacking on the local guide is some useful info about laws in the area.  It took a wasted trip to the liquor store to discover that liquor stores in SC are not allowed to sell beer.

The programming schedule grid sheet was hard to read correctly, leading people to misread start times by 30 minutes.   There ought to be a better software out there for these kinds of things.  If something exists, it could be shared from year to year.

This suffered from the usual lack of basic knowledge of Excel.  It’s a simple thing to merge cells together vertically and center the time so that you know for sure that this line means 9:00 and that line means 9:30.  There was some real confusion caused by the pocket program about whether certain panels started at 1:00 or 1:30.  Having each day on its own page did make for some simple folding to display at a glance what was coming up on that day.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2897 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night – Archival doc

 

 

FRIDAY NIGHT

The pre-judging time for the Single Pattern Contest was posted in the “stealth PR”.   At the con, in at least one case, a contestant was told the rehearsal was 2:00 PM.   As it turned out, there did not appear to be a rehearsal and there was some scrambling to get down to the ballroom for judging.   Bottom line: there should have been more announcements about the first competition of the con.  In any case, the show went off without a hitch, other than the MC mispronouncing  titles of entries.

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better than some past CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good thing.  (It would have been nice if arrangements had been made so that the people backstage didn’t miss out on some of that protein, though).

Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftover birthday cake for one of the co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

FNS –  I liked the free drink ticket.  It would have been nice if there were something worth drinking for free.  Charleston has some fine microbreweries.  I don’t understand not having at least one of them as a choice for a beer.  The food was the same stuff from the con suite.  I have to resurrect a comment from a CC in the past.  “Deja Food”.  Didn’t I just eat this?  Something that was a little amusing was the drawing they kept trying to have, only to have the person giving out the tickets scream that she was still handing them out.  Perhaps these tickets should have gone in the swag bag, like the drink ticket.  Just a thought.

 

There was also this:

 

The Friday Night Social was sold as featuring a variety of southern specialties. In reality, there was nothing except cheese trays and peach cobbler..…” (Not strictly true – there were pulled pork sandwiches, and the cobbler, for itself, was excellent)   “…Earlier on Friday, I heard some members suggesting that they could opt to skip dinner; I hope they didn’t do so.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2898 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality (for real) – Archival doc

 

 

(In refer4ence to Friday Night and food)  “Deja Food”, indeed.   The “egg mcmuffins” the SLCG sponsored Sunday morning in the Suite were appreciated, and several people thanked us later for providing them.   At least, those didn’t run out before most people who got up early enough didn’t miss out on them.   However, had we been reminded that the Brunch was supposed to be at 10:00 AM, we would have probably chosen a different time to sponsor the Suite.

The selection of food in the con suite got really boring.  I’m sure this was written into the hotel contract, but those sorts of things are always negotiable.  No hotel can make that an absolute.  You can always go to another hotel.  Some groups did manage to sneak some extra stuff into the room though.  I noticed the cheese curds from the CC Madison folks and the Mead.  I mentioned before the predilection for putting a little sugar in the unsweet tea.  I did like having tea to drink though.  The space needed to be a little larger and have a few more tables.  There were several mornings where Sue and I were a little stuck for a place to sit and the love seat in the middle of the room caused some traffic problems, some that couldn’t even be solved by leaving one door and coming back in the other.  The room was kept relatively clean by the hotel staff.  Aside from sugar in my unsweet tea, I can’t complain about them much.

The other bright spot in the otherwise repetitive fare in Hospitality was an ice cream social sponsored by Atomacon, a local SF con.    The one glaring item missing all weekend was soda.  All the drinks (tea, juices, etc.) were sweetened to some extent – even the apple juice (?).

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2899 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming – Archival doc

 

 

The Programming person was noticeably distracted by personal events, leading up to the last few months of the con.

There were misgivings about a peer having their way paid as guest – not sure what precedent that might set in the future.   Opinions were mixed as to the variety of panels and demos, so there was no consensus one way or another.    Most people liked what they saw.

There was a decent variety, just not enough of them.

 

It’s hard to strike that right balance of enough and not enough.   Not enough, people get bored.   Too many, then they complain about having to choose between panels.   One possibility might be to have more panels, but repeat some of them.

Also, the staggered start and end times were confusing and usually meant I either had to miss the last part of one, or the first part of another.

 

And:

 

My biggest issue was there was nowhere that said who was on what panels – so if you were on a panel and didn’t know what name it was in the program, you couldn’t find it. Also, if you were looking for someone in particular, no way to find what panel they might be on so you could find them.

The fact that this was not a very big con probably explains why the Friday and Saturday “My First Costume-Con” panels never had more than 5 people in them.  We believe they’re still an important panel to have, and provide an important service to newcomers – especially to let them know about Hospitality.   One of the newbies came all the way from North Dakota, and we suspect we have a new convert.

Very few panels had less than three attendees: apparently, the panel on how the Library of Congress is now archiving masquerade video was surprisingly well attended(!).

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2900 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/7/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade – Archival doc

 

 

It will be a recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been disastrous.   (Keep that in mind where you see the *)

For whatever reasons, all the normal tech crews were unavailable for CC33.  Probably , just a case of bad timing.    It was fortunate that Eric and Sue were able to bring at least a barebones tech set up along with their video equipment.    The PR#3 said people could submit their presentation music on either CDs or USB drives.  It turned out, though, there was limited tech – the amount of tech the Cannons could bring was limited by  the space in their car.   Because of that, all MP3 files had to be burned to CDs before they could be played.   They HAD suggested people bring more than one copy on more than one medium, but people may have not have done that, and it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting was going on Friday.   (We have since learned that the MD was unaware of this issue) .   Tech COULD have run WAY behind while the files were burned late in the day Saturday.*

Contestants were told to arrive at the Green Room at 6:00 PM – the GR was not prepared.   It seems they must have started getting organized, because it was 20-30 minutes before they allowed people in.  Not sure why people were only allowed into the somewhat cramped space in running order, and then assigned their den.

F/SF was the worst for space. I can’t say for the FFS/Curtains, because I wasn’t back there. Historical was tight, but not as much as F/SF…… The person arriving to do check-in was unpleasant and we had a bit of a snip-fest at the beginning. I was trying to be efficient, and she wanted things HER way.

 

Another quote:

 

….We didn’t get a running order and # of people per entry until at least 6:30, so we couldn’t set up the dens till then. It helped that the last entry was the 12 body entry, so they got the hall kind of by default. There was no way to put them in the room.

This made for a longer delay.   That’s really inefficient, especially when they were already running late.*    The contestants had to repeat their info to different people, even though they were right next to each other – probably a noise AND organization issue.

The dens were poorly set up with chairs in an oval, with no tables  – there was no space.   The contestants were told they could not use more than one seat, so where were they supposed to put the stuff they brought down?  Guess no one had thought of that.   One den wound up having to be set up out in the hall *.

Some entries wouldn’t have fit into the quilt room.  We were already having issues with exit doors – apparently the fire marshal was there and was being picky about stuff blocking the doors.

 

And:

 

…we were having to steal chairs from the audience because there weren’t enough in the green room for everyone.

 

As well as:

 

In hindsight, for F/SF, we really needed to swap the spaces of two of the dens (and put Santa into the corner). That giant costume kept sticking out into the only path for movement we had and catching every dangly bit that went by.

 

The den moms were given hats to wear to identify them, but apparently, no one actually mentioned that.   Guess it was supposed to be assumed.   The den moms were not informed to make sure people got to the official photographer – at least not initially.    The GR ran out of water at some point.   It DID have a repair kit, and it was used.

Recommendations: aprons instead of hats, and hand fans.

Official Photography took up about ¼ of the space that could have been used for Green Room, but there was no where else to really put it.

One person said: I don’t think there was really anyplace else for the photographers to go other than in that room – the partitions were kind of arbitrary, so yes, it was 1/3 of the space.

The judges were not photographed as part of the official record – not sure who would have been responsible for making sure that happened.

Workmanship judges were placed at the end of the main hall where the audience could potentially see them before the show – no attempt to curtain that area off was made (probably because it wasn’t really thought about until the last minute).

It was obvious that the con had some staffing issues, since the GR Director was also shooting the reference photos, as well as having been working Registration each day.  Unfortunately, her assistant was apparently not very experienced at the GR check in process.    There was also a shortage of backstage crew, with only 3 ninjas ( I stepped in to help).

The photo run ran without a problem, and the judges returned shortly after the video halftime. (The Workmanship judging panel had taken a little longer to complete deliberations).   Overall, less time might have been taken had the printing of awards started immediately after the Presentation judges had finished, rather than waiting for the Workmanship results.   It was apparently a bit of a “duh’ moment.   Regardless, awards were fair, there were enough people recognized for their efforts, and there were no controversies.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2901 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Sunday Daytime Activities – Archival doc

 

 

There was more than one lack of communication in regards to the Future Fashion Show .

There had been an announcement sometime late in 2014 on the FB page and (stealth) PR #3 about a Sunday Brunch and Cotillion “in conjunction” with the Future Fashion Show  at 10:00 AM  – this was the first the FFS Director learned of it, rather than via the Staff Yahoo group.   That was supposed to be the time when rehearsals would have been called.  The “brunch” was served – an hour late – in the main traffic hall outside the ballroom.   A sign was posted on the door of the Ballroom, stating that the FFS would start at 11:30 AM – again, the Director was not personally informed.   The brunch fare was slightly different (sandwiches and deep fried mac & cheese accompanied by the déjà food, but the protein ran out early) and the “cotillion” mostly consisted of some ladies standing around in their hoopskirts because there was no seating and they were not allowed to enter the ballroom while tech was going on.    Overall, it was poorly organized and poorly executed.

There were two factors that led to this year’s Future Fashion Show being the smallest in the con’s history.  The first factor was the Folio Editor’s mismanagement of the Folio, leaving little time for anyone to consider making an outfit for the show.  And so, there were only 2 children’s entries and one adult – all three were designed by the same person (the adult – who was not related to the children in any way).  The Folio Show Director made token efforts to promote the show, but it was deemed mostly of no use, given the lateness of the Folio.

The second major factor that affected the Folio show was the “Miss Ellen’s Portieres” competition.  This challenge apparently captured the imaginations of a lot of people – the show had more entries than the SF & F masquerade.   As a result, the people who had intended to enter both competitions had to choose between this or the Folio Show.    (Side note: People in the Portiere show as contestants, staff, and crew, were not accommodated by the committee to get brunch food to them).

Given the poor quality of the Future Fashion Folio, it’s not surprising that there were only three entries in the Future Fashion Show.  I think a contributing factor was scheduling the curtain contest immediately after.  Given that the Future Fashion Show is expressly called for in the Constitution, I think it’s time to stop scheduling things so that a person has to choose do I do the Future Fashion Show or do I do this other thing.  Either move those things to the Friday Night Social, as has been done in the past, or here’s a thought.  How about a contest for Monday afternoon.  No one seems to schedule any programming for that time.  Why not give us a contest?

 

Another:

Any extra stuff needs to either go with the Single Pattern on Friday, or be a display-only competition like shoes or ties. I think the tote-bag one that CC34 is doing is in that category, but I may be wrong

 

And finally:

You would think that, by now, we would have learned that putting anything in proximity to the FFS is detrimental to the Future Fashion Show.  It’s happened time and again.  This is something we really need to emphasize…

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2902 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Historical – Archival doc

 

 

Prejudging took place in the Green Room again, with the distractions of Tech Rehearsals.  There were only 10 entries in the show, so again – good thing it was a small con.*(Could have been a disaster if the con had been bigger)

An opportunity was missed to keep the judges corralled and also allow them additional time for discussion by arranging for them to have dinner together.   This worked at CC31.

Another recommendation –  Make sure to allow time for judges to change to costumes before the show – your costumes are the creds on your back.

The Green Room was the same size, but the contestants took up just about as much room because of 9 people with wings, among other things.  There was only one noticeable tech snag.  Again, the feeling by people was the awards were in adequate numbers, fair and again, no controversies.   Some of the contestants were surprised and pleased to be recognized.   At halftime, the quilt and doll awards announcements could have been done before the judges got back.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2903 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 7/8/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Monday – Archival doc

 

 

The Monday tour of Charleston was… a bit disorganized.   Originally, we had to sign up ahead of time before the con and send in a down payment for it.   Then, we found out a couple of weeks before we left that the tour time would slightly overlap the Road Show time slot.   We managed to arrange it so that we’d have 30 minutes to get stuff in the room and meet for pick up.   Then, we were told the tour was cancelled. During the weekend, we were told the tour was back ON again, but even earlier than we had been told.   Fortunately, Pierre and Sandy weren’t going on the tour, so they covered for us, and apparently had a pretty good turnout.

Upon our return from the Charleston tour, we learned there would be no Dead Dog Party.   Supposedly, it would take place the following night.    What in the world were they thinking?

The big problem with the con suite was that it disappeared Monday afternoon, leaving no space for the dead dog party.  Some real lack of planning there.

 

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 57 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 57 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2804 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2805 From: Kaijugal . Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2806 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/3/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2807 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/24/2015
Subject: A potential schedule of CCs for the future?
Group: runacc Message: 2808 From: beckieboo817 Date: 5/27/2015
Subject: Costume Con 36
Group: runacc Message: 2809 From: ma0902432 Date: 5/28/2015
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36
Group: runacc Message: 2810 From: ECM Date: 5/28/2015
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36
Group: runacc Message: 2811 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/30/2015
Subject: CC33 review is coming
Group: runacc Message: 2812 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming
Group: runacc Message: 2813 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming
Group: runacc Message: 2814 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2815 From: ECM Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2816 From: Vicky Young Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2817 From: Pierre and Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming
Group: runacc Message: 2818 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2819 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2820 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2821 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2822 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2823 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2824 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question – Betsy
Group: runacc Message: 2825 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question – Andy
Group: runacc Message: 2826 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2827 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2828 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2829 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2830 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2831 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2832 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question
Group: runacc Message: 2833 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2834 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2835 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2836 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion-correction
Group: runacc Message: 2837 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2838 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2839 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2840 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Future Fashion Folio
Group: runacc Message: 2841 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – The Hotel
Group: runacc Message: 2842 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2843 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night
Group: runacc Message: 2844 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2845 From: ECM Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 2846 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 2847 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2848 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – FFS and other stuph
Group: runacc Message: 2849 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 REview – Historical
Group: runacc Message: 2850 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Monday
Group: runacc Message: 2851 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Dealers Room
Group: runacc Message: 2852 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – One last recommendation
Group: runacc Message: 2853 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Exhibit Room

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2804 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 

 

You’re right – AN is the exception. Therefore, my comments don’t apply there.  And i was quoting from the other email – I should have excluded it.   You should have spoken up, there.  😉

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:29 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)


Bruce Mai wrote:

“Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.”

 

—–

No Bruce,


At Anime North we have a MASQUERADE  just so, ( with same emphasis to make point).

 

To say we don’t, or don’t care, it just straight up being rude.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:43:41 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

Getting back to the discussion late:

 

Re (With apologies to the Honey Badger) “cosplayers don’t care”.    Reading the discussion and drawing from my own experience, I can certainly understand the mindset of there being less of a  sense of “competition-worthy” costumes, but Stace’s comments give me some insight into the perception.  So, it’s not so much “onstage competition-worthy” – that energy is less focused on masquerade competition and more about impressing their peers and the public in the halls.     There’s apparently still a healthy sense of competition among a certain percentage of costumer/cosplayers, though.   Nonetheless, there are  “horror stories” of the ones that lie about their workmanship, etc.   (Andy has a very notorious example of that).

 

Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.   The con has its own culture, and should be recognized as unique in its focus.   Yes, it should be inclusive, but I think it does a disservice to new people to assume they are not  willing to learn about how a different con works.

    

Re: Awards – Those “horse ribbons” represent more at CC.  Sure, the big cons have all sorts of prizes, etc.   But at CC, they represent recognition by their peers that they are respected for their efforts.   That shouldn’t be underestimated.   And for a lot of people, that respect is more important to them because their labors of love are acknowledged.    I know –  I have seen the excitement and tears when they get called up on stage. 

 

An additional thought or two: One thing that sets CC apart is the opportunity to have a tech rehearsal.   I fully understand the decisions made by the CC32 tech crew to abbreviate times (or outright deny time to some) for completely valid logistical reasons, due to the number of entries.   I just hope that’s not a precedent set.   New people are always amazed and thankful for the time to walk the stage with Tech.  And frankly, that’s probably only a danger when we’re back in San Diego and Toronto.    Hopefully, aware of CC32’s experience, those bigger cons will  plan accordingly.

 

Ultimately, it’s still the prerogative of each MD, or concom, to set the costume policy.    Should CC34 adopt the suggestions made on this list, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on the hall costumes as well as the quality of the masquerade(s).  It’s is an opportunity to “make new mistakes!”, as pas CC con staff have frequently exhorted  the concoms that follow to do.

 

For my part, I’m actually glad to know what the policy for Toronto will be – I think it might give me a slight advantage over many of my fellow competitors.  🙂

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

 

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”


I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

 

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

 

 

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

 

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

 

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares. 

 

After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.

 

It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.

 

Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.

 


 

Posted by: admin@conbravo.com

 


 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2805 From: Kaijugal . Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 

Thank you. I appreciate you amending that comment.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 13:15:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

 

You’re right – AN is the exception. Therefore, my comments don’t apply there.  And i was quoting from the other email – I should have excluded it.   You should have spoken up, there.  😉

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:29 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Bruce Mai wrote:

“Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.”

—–

No Bruce,


At Anime North we have a MASQUERADE  just so, ( with same emphasis to make point).

To say we don’t, or don’t care, it just straight up being rude.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:43:41 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Getting back to the discussion late:

 

Re (With apologies to the Honey Badger) “cosplayers don’t care”.    Reading the discussion and drawing from my own experience, I can certainly understand the mindset of there being less of a  sense of “competition-worthy” costumes, but Stace’s comments give me some insight into the perception.  So, it’s not so much “onstage competition-worthy” – that energy is less focused on masquerade competition and more about impressing their peers and the public in the halls.     There’s apparently still a healthy sense of competition among a certain percentage of costumer/cosplayers, though.   Nonetheless, there are  “horror stories” of the ones that lie about their workmanship, etc.   (Andy has a very notorious example of that).

 

Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.   The con has its own culture, and should be recognized as unique in its focus.   Yes, it should be inclusive, but I think it does a disservice to new people to assume they are not  willing to learn about how a different con works.

    

Re: Awards – Those “horse ribbons” represent more at CC.  Sure, the big cons have all sorts of prizes, etc.   But at CC, they represent recognition by their peers that they are respected for their efforts.   That shouldn’t be underestimated.   And for a lot of people, that respect is more important to them because their labors of love are acknowledged.    I know –  I have seen the excitement and tears when they get called up on stage. 

 

An additional thought or two: One thing that sets CC apart is the opportunity to have a tech rehearsal.   I fully understand the decisions made by the CC32 tech crew to abbreviate times (or outright deny time to some) for completely valid logistical reasons, due to the number of entries.   I just hope that’s not a precedent set.   New people are always amazed and thankful for the time to walk the stage with Tech.  And frankly, that’s probably only a danger when we’re back in San Diego and Toronto.    Hopefully, aware of CC32’s experience, those bigger cons will  plan accordingly.

 

Ultimately, it’s still the prerogative of each MD, or concom, to set the costume policy.    Should CC34 adopt the suggestions made on this list, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on the hall costumes as well as the quality of the masquerade(s).  It’s is an opportunity to “make new mistakes!”, as pas CC con staff have frequently exhorted  the concoms that follow to do.

 

For my part, I’m actually glad to know what the policy for Toronto will be – I think it might give me a slight advantage over many of my fellow competitors.  🙂

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”

I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares.

After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.

It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.

Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.

 


 

Posted by: admin@conbravo.com

 


 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2806 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/3/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 

 

Yeah, got sloppy there.   Mixing two different thoughts.   My bad.     You guys have one of the best run masqs in North America.   It IS  one of three International-level venues, now, after all.   🙂

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 6:30 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Thank you. I appreciate you amending that comment.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 13:15:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

You’re right – AN is the exception. Therefore, my comments don’t apply there.  And i was quoting from the other email – I should have excluded it.   You should have spoken up, there.  😉

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:29 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 


Bruce Mai wrote:

“Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.”

 

—–

No Bruce,


At Anime North we have a MASQUERADE  just so, ( with same emphasis to make point).

 

To say we don’t, or don’t care, it just straight up being rude.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:43:41 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

Getting back to the discussion late:

 

Re (With apologies to the Honey Badger) “cosplayers don’t care”.    Reading the discussion and drawing from my own experience, I can certainly understand the mindset of there being less of a  sense of “competition-worthy” costumes, but Stace’s comments give me some insight into the perception.  So, it’s not so much “onstage competition-worthy” – that energy is less focused on masquerade competition and more about impressing their peers and the public in the halls.     There’s apparently still a healthy sense of competition among a certain percentage of costumer/cosplayers, though.   Nonetheless, there are  “horror stories” of the ones that lie about their workmanship, etc.   (Andy has a very notorious example of that).

 

Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.   The con has its own culture, and should be recognized as unique in its focus.   Yes, it should be inclusive, but I think it does a disservice to new people to assume they are not  willing to learn about how a different con works.

    

Re: Awards – Those “horse ribbons” represent more at CC.  Sure, the big cons have all sorts of prizes, etc.   But at CC, they represent recognition by their peers that they are respected for their efforts.   That shouldn’t be underestimated.   And for a lot of people, that respect is more important to them because their labors of love are acknowledged.    I know –  I have seen the excitement and tears when they get called up on stage. 

 

An additional thought or two: One thing that sets CC apart is the opportunity to have a tech rehearsal.   I fully understand the decisions made by the CC32 tech crew to abbreviate times (or outright deny time to some) for completely valid logistical reasons, due to the number of entries.   I just hope that’s not a precedent set.   New people are always amazed and thankful for the time to walk the stage with Tech.  And frankly, that’s probably only a danger when we’re back in San Diego and Toronto.    Hopefully, aware of CC32’s experience, those bigger cons will  plan accordingly.

 

Ultimately, it’s still the prerogative of each MD, or concom, to set the costume policy.    Should CC34 adopt the suggestions made on this list, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on the hall costumes as well as the quality of the masquerade(s).  It’s is an opportunity to “make new mistakes!”, as pas CC con staff have frequently exhorted  the concoms that follow to do.

 

For my part, I’m actually glad to know what the policy for Toronto will be – I think it might give me a slight advantage over many of my fellow competitors.  🙂

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

 

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”


I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

 

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

 

 

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

 

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

 

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares. 

 

After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.

 

It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.

 

Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.

 

 


 

Posted by: admin@conbravo.com

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2807 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/24/2015
Subject: A potential schedule of CCs for the future?

 

 

Just FYI:

We’ll come back to this, but after this most recent CC, we’ve heard via the grapevine that there are discussions going on of potential CC bids as far out as 2021.   However, we have not heard of anyone thinking about CC37 (2019).   Sounds like an opportunity for anyone uncommitted yet.   That would mean it’s less than  1 year to get in a proposal to Karen.

There’s also another thing we noted about some of these potential bids, but we’ll bring that up on another post.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2808 From: beckieboo817 Date: 5/27/2015
Subject: Costume Con 36

Hi, all,

 

I trust that most of you are home and recovering from CC33 in Charleston.  I won the bid for CC36 as most of you know because you were there.

 

Today, I’ve spent the day setting up a staff website for Costume Con 36. A lot of you are far away and may know that I have set an organizational meeting for June 14, 2015 at 2 p.m. PDT at my house. I’m not sure how skype works but we’ll see what we can get going on that front.

 

If you’re interested in looking at what I have set up, let me know because I’ll have to send you an invitation to join.  We are looking for people to mentor a younger generation in the various masquerades and contests. That’s not to say if you want to run one, I will say no but we do need to get the young’uns involved.

 

You can reach me at Rebecca8175@gmail.com or on the phone at (858) 245-8170.

 

I look forward to your feedback.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2809 From: ma0902432 Date: 5/28/2015
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36
Hello, Lisa Ashton here.

WhileI live on the East Coast, and cannot participate in meetings, I”d
be happy to help by sending lists of program topics, panels, workshops,
demos…..I had a lot of suggestions that were not able to configure, and
I have done costume track programming for other CC’s as well as all our
long-running East Coast cons. I’d love to be able to view the program as
it develops.

Yours in costuming, Lisa A

On 27 May 2015 19:48:38 -0700 “beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc]”
<runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Hi, all,

I trust that most of you are home and recovering from CC33 in Charleston.
I won the bid for CC36 as most of you know because you were there.

Today, I’ve spent the day setting up a staff website for Costume Con 36.
A lot of you are far away and may know that I have set an organizational
meeting for June 14, 2015 at 2 p.m. PDT at my house. I’m not sure how
skype works but we’ll see what we can get going on that front.

If you’re interested in looking at what I have set up, let me know
because I’ll have to send you an invitation to join. We are looking for
people to mentor a younger generation in the various masquerades and
contests. That’s not to say if you want to run one, I will say no but we
do need to get the young’uns involved.

You can reach me at Rebecca8175@gmail.com or on the phone at (858)
245-8170.

I look forward to your feedback.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2810 From: ECM Date: 5/28/2015
Subject: Re: Costume Con 36

 

The reality of CostumeCons is that many, if not most, of our staff are scattered throughout the US & Canada.  Lisa & I are just a couple of them.  However, the on-site core members will be doing the most meeting for at least this first year.  Ideally someone can set up a live, on-line meeting for us for later.  Skype is only one way, or so I’ve been told.  I plan to drive out a few times a year, especially whenever She Who Must Be Obeyed needs me.

Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:00:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Costume Con 36

 

Hello, Lisa Ashton here.

WhileI live on the East Coast, and cannot participate in meetings, I”d
be happy to help by sending lists of program topics, panels, workshops,
demos…..I had a lot of suggestions that were not able to configure, and
I have done costume track programming for other CC’s as well as all our
long-running East Coast cons. I’d love to be able to view the program as
it develops.

Yours in costuming, Lisa A

On 27 May 2015 19:48:38 -0700 “beckieboo817@yahoo.com [runacc]”
<runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

Hi, all,

I trust that most of you are home and recovering from CC33 in Charleston.
I won the bid for CC36 as most of you know because you were there.

Today, I’ve spent the day setting up a staff website for Costume Con 36.
A lot of you are far away and may know that I have set an organizational
meeting for June 14, 2015 at 2 p.m. PDT at my house. I’m not sure how
skype works but we’ll see what we can get going on that front.

If you’re interested in looking at what I have set up, let me know
because I’ll have to send you an invitation to join. We are looking for
people to mentor a younger generation in the various masquerades and
contests. That’s not to say if you want to run one, I will say no but we
do need to get the young’uns involved.

You can reach me at Rebecca8175@gmail.com or on the phone at (858)
245-8170.

I look forward to your feedback.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2811 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/30/2015
Subject: CC33 review is coming

 

 

First draft is done.   Just gathering anyone else’s comments from the SLCG before I start compiling it for the list.

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2812 From: Tina Connell Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming
We haven’t chimed in on our hotel stay experience, but I would like to at least comment on our guest room.
Our room was on the alleged ‘Business Level’ (because we wanted a room with a fridge). To use the term ‘Business’ for rooms on this floor is a joke. There was no desk area at all, nor were there any adjacent outlets to the low dresser/TV shelf. When I called the front desk and asked about this anomaly, I was told that ‘Business Level’ just meant that it came with a fridge & microwave (not that rooms on this floor were equipped for anyone who might plan to actually do some business). After shifting the furniture a bit, I was able to discover that there was a power strip behind the dresser/TV shelf, so we were able to manage our electronics (printer & computer, which were needed for the SF&F Masquerade). Still, to have to work hunched over a surface that was several inches too low for comfort was a pain.
Furthermore, in a two-bed room, there was only one chair. We requested a 2nd chair so we could both have a place to sit, but what was provided was simply a function room chair, not comfortable guest seating at all.
Although we did receive daily room servicing, it was generally quite late, and we had to call to ask if anyone was going to do our room on a couple of days (“Oh, did you want someone to clean your room?,” in a surprised tone of voice, in response to one of those calls). The ‘Do Not Disturb’ sign was off of our door by 8:30 am each day, so it wasn’t as though they thought we didn’t want our room serviced. Housekeeping was a bit casual about replacing important supplies (toilet paper) a couple of times.
The room itself was a case in point for why this place lost its Sheraton franchise. For the most part, it was (aside from my previous comments) fairly decent, although the beds were on the hard side. BUT – the carpet was absolutely filthy! There were numerous large spilled beverage spots all over, with the ground-in dirt very obvious. They had obviously been there for quite a long time. Although the room didn’t smell, the ambiance was dreadful as a result.
We don’t normally watch TV, so we didn’t discover until the last evening we were there that the TV was not functional at all (all we got was snow). I must say, the hotel was very good about sending Maintenance promptly. He pulled out the dresser and discovered that the cable wire was damaged. Although he fixed it, we were still unable to watch TV, as almost all stations were still unavailable (snow). There was a Direct TV (I think that was it) logo that popped up on screen, but if that is the company providing the hotel’s TV service, they are doing a terrible job — not one regular national channel (CBS, ABC, NBC) was available.
Overall, staff support was pretty good. When we called about a shortage of TP, it was delivered within minutes, and as I said, Maintenance was also quick to respond.
Overall, this is not a place I would ever want to return to.
Tina Connell

 

Group: runacc Message: 2813 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming

 

 

Which floor was the business level?

 

Nora

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 6:13 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: CC33 review is coming

We haven’t chimed in on our hotel stay experience, but I would like to at least comment on our guest room.

Our room was on the alleged ‘Business Level’ (because we wanted a room with a fridge). To use the term ‘Business’ for rooms on this floor is a joke. There was no desk area at all, nor were there any adjacent outlets to the low dresser/TV shelf. When I called the front desk and asked about this anomaly, I was told that ‘Business Level’ just meant that it came with a fridge & microwave (not that rooms on this floor were equipped for anyone who might plan to actually do some business). After shifting the furniture a bit, I was able to discover that there was a power strip behind the dresser/TV shelf, so we were able to manage our electronics (printer & computer, which were needed for the SF&F Masquerade). Still, to have to work hunched over a surface that was several inches too low for comfort was a pain.

Furthermore, in a two-bed room, there was only one chair. We requested a 2nd chair so we could both have a place to sit, but what was provided was simply a function room chair, not comfortable guest seating at all.

Although we did receive daily room servicing, it was generally quite late, and we had to call to ask if anyone was going to do our room on a couple of days (“Oh, did you want someone to clean your room?,” in a surprised tone of voice, in response to one of those calls). The ‘Do Not Disturb’ sign was off of our door by 8:30 am each day, so it wasn’t as though they thought we didn’t want our room serviced. Housekeeping was a bit casual about replacing important supplies (toilet paper) a couple of times.

The room itself was a case in point for why this place lost its Sheraton franchise. For the most part, it was (aside from my previous comments) fairly decent, although the beds were on the hard side. BUT – the carpet was absolutely filthy! There were numerous large spilled beverage spots all over, with the ground-in dirt very obvious. They had obviously been there for quite a long time. Although the room didn’t smell, the ambiance was dreadful as a result.

We don’t normally watch TV, so we didn’t discover until the last evening we were there that the TV was not functional at all (all we got was snow). I must say, the hotel was very good about sending Maintenance promptly. He pulled out the dresser and discovered that the cable wire was damaged. Although he fixed it, we were still unable to watch TV, as almost all stations were still unavailable (snow). There was a Direct TV (I think that was it) logo that popped up on screen, but if that is the company providing the hotel’s TV service, they are doing a terrible job — not one regular national channel (CBS, ABC, NBC) was available.

Overall, staff support was pretty good. When we called about a shortage of TP, it was delivered within minutes, and as I said, Maintenance was also quick to respond.

Overall, this is not a place I would ever want to return to.

Tina Connell

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2814 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

So, while I’m still working on the review, let me throw this out here:

There is a costumer we know who posited a question about Folio submissions.   I didn’t want to take it to too public a forum, so I figured I’d start here.   This could be a philosophy question, but it may also be the very beginning of a situation that perhaps future Folio Editors (and potential judges of same) should have at least an answer for.   This may be something I would ultimately want to take off list, but you can all at least give me your initial input as to where it should be taken.

As a preface, I don’t really agree with this costumer, but the fact that there’s one person who’s asked this question, and how it involves evolving technology means it could crop up again.   It’s that whole “learn that person’s point of view in order to argue it effectively”.   Well, I don’t that I have the background and history or perspective to come back with it, so I want to see what others more closely connected with the Folio in the past might say.

In a nutshell, this costumer wishes to submit designs that have been completely generated on a computer.  Now, before you say, “nothing wrong with that”, here’s what they are doing.   Please be sure to ask me questions first, before jumping to a conclusion because I may have accidentally left a detail out in my laying out this case.

They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.

To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.

They think this will become a more common “style” with more younger artists.   I don’t agree, but with technology, you never know.   They effectively are  thinking they are questioning a “status quo”.   I will leave my own opinion out of it, but I told them, ultimately, it’s up to the individual Editor for each CC.    .

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2815 From: ECM Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

Having never produced or run a folio or its accompanying show, my opinion  is strictly from the point of view as a producer of the costumes.  I can neither create a design on paper nor by computer.  I’m a “maker.”

I find it easier to translate line drawings into costumes because they are leaving lots of the detail up to me.  I love figuring out what I need to do to recreate that drawing.

I’m also thinking that the quality of a computer rendering vs a drawing – no matter how detailed – might skew a judge’s opinion.  I’m also thinking that it might lead to a two-part competition – drawn and computer-generated.

Please come up with some logical suggestions in time for CC 36!

Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:40:55 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

So, while I’m still working on the review, let me throw this out here:

There is a costumer we know who posited a question about Folio submissions.   I didn’t want to take it to too public a forum, so I figured I’d start here.   This could be a philosophy question, but it may also be the very beginning of a situation that perhaps future Folio Editors (and potential judges of same) should have at least an answer for.   This may be something I would ultimately want to take off list, but you can all at least give me your initial input as to where it should be taken.

As a preface, I don’t really agree with this costumer, but the fact that there’s one person who’s asked this question, and how it involves evolving technology means it could crop up again.   It’s that whole “learn that person’s point of view in order to argue it effectively”.   Well, I don’t that I have the background and history or perspective to come back with it, so I want to see what others more closely connected with the Folio in the past might say.

In a nutshell, this costumer wishes to submit designs that have been completely generated on a computer.  Now, before you say, “nothing wrong with that”, here’s what they are doing.   Please be sure to ask me questions first, before jumping to a conclusion because I may have accidentally left a detail out in my laying out this case.

They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.

To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.

They think this will become a more common “style” with more younger artists.   I don’t agree, but with technology, you never know.   They effectively are  thinking they are questioning a “status quo”.   I will leave my own opinion out of it, but I told them, ultimately, it’s up to the individual Editor for each CC.    .

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

Bruce

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2816 From: Vicky Young Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

I’ve never run or produced the show either, but I’ve submitted a design – I guess my question would be what the spirit of the competition would be. Are the designs meant to be interpreted by the maker, or are they intended to be reproduced exactly (texture, fabrics, colors, etc) by the maker?
While I can understand the idea of piecing together an “original design” from existing sources, it calls into question whether that is truly an original design…
Vicky


On Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:41 AM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



So, while I’m still working on the review, let me throw this out here:
There is a costumer we know who posited a question about Folio submissions.   I didn’t want to take it to too public a forum, so I figured I’d start here.   This could be a philosophy question, but it may also be the very beginning of a situation that perhaps future Folio Editors (and potential judges of same) should have at least an answer for.   This may be something I would ultimately want to take off list, but you can all at least give me your initial input as to where it should be taken.
As a preface, I don’t really agree with this costumer, but the fact that there’s one person who’s asked this question, and how it involves evolving technology means it could crop up again.   It’s that whole “learn that person’s point of view in order to argue it effectively”.   Well, I don’t that I have the background and history or perspective to come back with it, so I want to see what others more closely connected with the Folio in the past might say.
In a nutshell, this costumer wishes to submit designs that have been completely generated on a computer.  Now, before you say, “nothing wrong with that”, here’s what they are doing.   Please be sure to ask me questions first, before jumping to a conclusion because I may have accidentally left a detail out in my laying out this case.
They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.
To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.
They think this will become a more common “style” with more younger artists.   I don’t agree, but with technology, you never know.   They effectively are  thinking they are questioning a “status quo”.   I will leave my own opinion out of it, but I told them, ultimately, it’s up to the individual Editor for each CC.    .
I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?
Bruce



 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2817 From: Pierre and Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: CC33 review is coming

 

7th Floor.

Sandy

At 08:21 AM 5/31/2015, you wrote:

 

Which floor was the business
level?

Nora

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
[
mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com
]
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 6:13 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: CC33 review is coming

We haven’t chimed in on our hotel stay experience, but I would like to at
least comment on our guest room.

Our room was on the alleged ‘Business Level’ (because we wanted a room
with a fridge). To use the term ‘Business’ for rooms on this floor is a
joke. There was no desk area at all, nor were there any adjacent outlets
to the low dresser/TV shelf. When I called the front desk and asked about
this anomaly, I was told that ‘Business Level’ just meant that it came
with a fridge & microwave (not that rooms on this floor were equipped
for anyone who might plan to actually do some business). After shifting
the furniture a bit, I was able to discover that there was a power strip
behind the dresser/TV shelf, so we were able to manage our electronics
(printer & computer, which were needed for the SF&F Masquerade).
Still, to have to work hunched over a surface that was several inches too
low for comfort was a pain.

Furthermore, in a two-bed room, there was only one chair. We requested a
2nd chair so we could both have a place to sit, but what was provided was
simply a function room chair, not comfortable guest seating at
all.

Although we did receive daily room servicing, it was generally quite
late, and we had to call to ask if anyone was going to do our room on a
couple of days (“Oh, did you want someone to clean your room?,”
in a surprised tone of voice, in response to one of those calls). The ‘Do
Not Disturb’ sign was off of our door by 8:30 am each day, so it wasn’t
as though they thought we didn’t want our room serviced. Housekeeping was
a bit casual about replacing important supplies (toilet paper) a couple
of times.

The room itself was a case in point for why this place lost i

International Costumers’ Guild Archivist


http://www.costume.org/gallery2/main.php

“Those Who Fail to Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly –
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C. Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2818 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

I’ve never run or produced the show either, but I’ve submitted a design – I guess my question would be what the spirit of the competition would be. Are the designs meant to be interpreted by the maker, or are they intended to be reproduced exactly (texture, fabrics, colors, etc) by the maker? 

 

I know what my opinion is on this:   that’s why I’m asking what others think.   I could be wrong, but it seems like saying, “here’s my creation – play around with it”.   Of course, they would never expect everyone else to be that forgiving with it.   I know of another costumer who only submits a design they intend to do themselves, because they believe they are the only one who can truly interpret it (in which case, my question would be, how good can it be if no one else can follow the design, but that’s’ another discussion).

 

While I can understand the idea of piecing together an “original design” from existing sources, it calls into question whether that is truly an original design…

 

That’s part of the question.   They would say, “I have this idea in my head – I’m taking these elements I’ve found online and molding them to my idea to achieve it, therefore it is original”.

 

Vicky

 

On Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:41 AM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

So, while I’m still working on the review, let me throw this out here:

 

There is a costumer we know who posited a question about Folio submissions.   I didn’t want to take it to too public a forum, so I figured I’d start here.   This could be a philosophy question, but it may also be the very beginning of a situation that perhaps future Folio Editors (and potential judges of same) should have at least an answer for.   This may be something I would ultimately want to take off list, but you can all at least give me your initial input as to where it should be taken.

 

As a preface, I don’t really agree with this costumer, but the fact that there’s one person who’s asked this question, and how it involves evolving technology means it could crop up again.   It’s that whole “learn that person’s point of view in order to argue it effectively”.   Well, I don’t that I have the background and history or perspective to come back with it, so I want to see what others more closely connected with the Folio in the past might say.

 

In a nutshell, this costumer wishes to submit designs that have been completely generated on a computer.  Now, before you say, “nothing wrong with that”, here’s what they are doing.   Please be sure to ask me questions first, before jumping to a conclusion because I may have accidentally left a detail out in my laying out this case.

 

They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the ! shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.  

 

To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a! line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.  

 

They think this will become a more common “style” with more younger artists.   I don’t agree, but with technology, you never know.   They effectively are  thinking they are questioning a “status quo”.   I will leave my own opinion out of it, but I told them, ultimately, it’s up to the individual Editor for each CC.    . 

 

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2819 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

Bruce wrote:

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

 I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?”

——-

When we ran the CC32 folio we still asked for the traditional black & white line drawings, even though we were thrilled with the fact that due to modern technology and the folio being distributed electronically we could include also the artists coloured and/or rendered drawings along with the traditional style black & white.

I had one costumer memorably tell us that she appreciated this as she is largely a recreation costumer and she wanted to make the costume to the designers exact ideal. (In contrast I personally like to be able to play around with designs a little bit using the fabric choices etc).

Overall I feel this should not be a discussion on what tools are used to produce the art, (traditional or computer),but about the requirements of the folio itself. How far is Costume-Con going to go to accommodate people who disagree with the current requirement for black & white line art? (If at all. I do not personally feel there is anything unjust about the current requirement.)

Admittedly, when I paint a design I am then required to trace it out to make the black & white line art, and it’s a bit of a pain, and looses some of the original feel, but hey, that’s life, suck it up buttercup! *grins wryly*

I’ll state again for emphasis, I do not feel this should be a discussion about tools, but more about rules and adherence, about the competition as it is, and if Costume-Con will choose to change it into something else or not.
I’m linking to examples of why I say this:
A folio design I made on a piece of paper: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/7959527998/in/dateposted-public/

A folio design I doodles on my tablet (computer)  during a slow conference call : https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/5046500115/in/dateposted-public/

Done with classic (2b pencil), and modern, (computer) , mediums and both within the rules.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

Bruce wrote:

 

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2820 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

The logic behind line drawings has much more to do with the reproduction process as it was, I think, in part. Patterned images just don’t print as well as line drawings. Now if the Folio is no longer a printed document (circulated on paper), maybe the design process is irrelevant, but I can say it’s a heck of a lot easier to interpret seam lines and construction requirements if the design is line drawing instead of full rendering.

My $.02, adjusted for inflation.
YMMV.
Betsy

 

 

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:41 AM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Bruce wrote:

 

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

 

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?”

——-

 

When we ran the CC32 folio we still asked for the traditional black & white line drawings, even though we were thrilled with the fact that due to modern technology and the folio being distributed electronically we could include also the artists coloured and/or rendered drawings along with the traditional style black & white.

I had one costumer memorably tell us that she appreciated this as she is largely a recreation costumer and she wanted to make the costume to the designers exact ideal. (In contrast I personally like to be able to play around with designs a little bit using the fabric choices etc).

Overall I feel this should not be a discussion on what tools are used to produce the art, (traditional or computer),but about the requirements of the folio itself. How far is Costume-Con going to go to accommodate people who disagree with the current requirement for black & white line art? (If at all. I do not personally feel there is anything unjust about the current requirement.)

Admittedly, when I paint a design I am then required to trace it out to make the black & white line art, and it’s a bit of a pain, and looses some of the original feel, but hey, that’s life, suck it up buttercup! *grins wryly*

I’ll state again for emphasis, I do not feel this should be a discussion about tools, but more about rules and adherence, about the competition as it is, and if Costume-Con will choose to change it into something else or not.
I’m linking to examples of why I say this:
A folio design I made on a piece of paper: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/7959527998/in/dateposted-public/

A folio design I doodles on my tablet (computer)  during a slow conference call : https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/5046500115/in/dateposted-public/

 

Done with classic (2b pencil), and modern, (computer) , mediums and both within the rules.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

Bruce wrote:

 

 

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

 

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

Bruce

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2821 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

There is no disagreement that electronically producing the Folio has allowed a greater product since we can include more detail, color, etc. And this is in essence a discussion about the rules rather than the method.

But there are reasons for the requirement other than “because it is in the rules”.

 

I’m a firm believer in the b&w line art requirement for a couple of reasons.

1. It “levels” the playing field from a judges perspective. All entrants in the same basic format means less “noise” or distractions for the judges to have to ignore to see the essential design. Some people will always render the figures etc more competently but if the lines are clear the judges can see the designers intent better.

2. It also helps level the designers – some people are more comfortable with one media over another, some can “draw” more clearly than others; basic line drawing is accessible to all regardless of their proficiency.

 

Nora

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:42 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

Bruce wrote:

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

 I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?”

——-

 

When we ran the CC32 folio we still asked for the traditional black & white line drawings, even though we were thrilled with the fact that due to modern technology and the folio being distributed electronically we could include also the artists coloured and/or rendered drawings along with the traditional style black & white.

I had one costumer memorably tell us that she appreciated this as she is largely a recreation costumer and she wanted to make the costume to the designers exact ideal. (In contrast I personally like to be able to play around with designs a little bit using the fabric choices etc).

Overall I feel this should not be a discussion on what tools are used to produce the art, (traditional or computer),but about the requirements of the folio itself. How far is Costume-Con going to go to accommodate people who disagree with the cur! rent requirement for black & white line art? (If at all. I do not personally feel there is anything unjust about the current requirement.)

Admittedly, when I paint a design I am then required to trace it out to make the black & white line art, and it’s a bit of a pain, and looses some of the original feel, but hey, that’s life, suck it up buttercup! *grins wryly*

I’ll state again for emphasis, I do not feel this should be a discussion about tools, but more about rules and adherence, about the competition as it is, and if Costume-Con will choose to change it into something else or not.
I’m linking to examples of why I say this:
A folio design I made on a piece of paper: https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/7959527998/in/dateposted-public/


A folio design I doodles on my tablet (computer)  during a slow conference call : https://www.flickr.com/photos/14178897@N07/5046500115/in/dateposted-public/

 

Done with classic (2b pencil), and modern, (computer) , mediums and both within the rules.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


Bruce wrote:

 

“What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   ”  

 

 

I welcome your thoughts, because I know there are those of you who can articulate a better answer – or perhaps you agree?

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2822 From: staceylee25 Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

Of course I’ve not run one or even submitted a design, but I’ve always wanted to. I’ve always eyeballed the rules every single year, but it turns out I just don’t have a design bone in my body. I do have the perspective of someone who would create one of the designs if one grabbed me, someone who is a replicator.

Yes, collaging in the general sense is still “art.” There is nothing wrong with creating “art” in that mien, with the possible exception of using other people’s copyrighted material without permission. However, as I understand the Future Fashion Design Contest, we’re not out to create ART, we’re out to design clothing that hasn’t been conceived of before, which costumers can then build from the design. So, “but this is the future of artistic expression!” is a moot argument.

As a replicator, when I’m trying to research and dissect a costume design, I NEED the black and white sketches to help me figure out where seams are, what’s clothing and what’s not, so on and so forth. Particularly with 2D art, when the final rendering includes reflection lines, textures, etc, which can be mistaken for seams or layers if looked at incorrectly. From a practical creator’s standpoint, the B&W lineart is absolutely necessary. Color pages are nice, as are indications of texture, but that’s a later phase of re-creation. The first phase is understanding the shape, fit, and structure of the design.

From another POV, the FFF has always seemed, from the outside, to be an analog to a fashion designer creating a seasonal catalog of their new clothing styles, which would then be created for the runway show. I don’t know if anyone can answer this, but is “collaging” from existing images used in the fashion industry to create new clothing lines? Is Fashion Week full of designers who no longer sketch out their own unique designs whether with a pencil or a tablet? If yes, then maybe this argument would hold more water, but if the fashion industry itself is still running on designs drawn from scratch, then that seems like a valid model to follow. Or, for another example, do movie studios still draw base sketches of the shape of costumes, which the costume department has to interpret into a garment? Maybe they do have to render that costume into 3D for CG animation later, but for the scenes where the actors need to be clothed, does the costume department require B&W or basic simplified drawings (paper or tablet) from which they can work to draft the costumes? I don’t know if anyone knows and can explain how these other clothing/costuming industries work, but if they can, I’d love to hear it. And then point to that as an example of why the FFF is structured the way it is.

I don’t care if someone is using a photo to sketch out a base shape but then completely altering that shape, because they feel like their drawing skills aren’t up to drawing the shape of a boot around a croquis’ foot. It seems like they’re focusing too much on having a perfect drawing rather than communicating their design ideas, but it’s not egregious. But the less alteration there is, the more this method skews away from actual design and more toward compiling an outfit out of extant garments – and extant garment shapes – and then you run into the issue of having to try to fine-tune rules to try to explain exactly what percentage of change to the original image constitutes “original design.” That would be so fiddly as to be a nightmare to try to police. For sheer logistics’ sake it’s easier to just say “this is what we want, take it or leave it.” You don’t want to charge the director with the extra task of doing reverse image searches in google to verify that the base images have actually been altered or re-designed.

I get you though, Bruce, that second paragraph just reads like…I don’t know. “You don’t understand my vision which can only be communicated by my own method!” But I would have to see an example of one of these design images before I could say one way or the other, whether this is a good design technique for communicating original designs, or if it’s just one person’s idea of how clothing should be designed based on nothing but their own technology, versus actually understanding the core concepts of garment design and construction and using them to create entirely new ideas. It’s like saying you know how to tailor a Victorian tailcoat even though you’ve only ever looked at pictures of Victorian tailcoats without ever actually draping one on a body and seeing how the seams inform the shape and fit. Maybe a bad example but that’s how it’s coming across to me.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.

To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2823 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

But there are reasons for the requirement other than “because it is in the rules”.

I’m a “keep the rules simple, let the judges sort it out” kind of guy.

But if you wanted to go down the path of figuring out what the rules should really be, I’m going to suggest that we look at how fashion design, fashion illustration and costume designs are submitted to the people creating garments (or pattern makers) in the real/professional world. Sure, they may have just as much “because that’s the way we’ve always done it” going on, but they may also better explain the reasons for doing things in a standard way…

 

Group: runacc Message: 2824 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question – Betsy

 

 

Now THERE’S a good point I hadn’t thought of.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 6:21 AM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

The logic behind line drawings has much more to do with the reproduction process as it was, I think, in part. Patterned images just don’t print as well as line drawings. Now if the Folio is no longer a printed document (circulated on paper), maybe the design process is irrelevant, but I can say it’s a heck of a lot easier to interpret seam lines and construction requirements if the design is line drawing instead of full rendering.

My $.02, adjusted for inflation.

YMMV.

Betsy

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:41 AM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2825 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question – Andy

 

 

And that’s what I’m sort of trying to get at.

 

This person’s main reason for photo manipulation is so that they can get more precise lines than their own drawing skills, but I have a feeling they’ve also been influenced by the way art is now rendered at places like Disney, where everything is state of the art.   I think that, while that may be the way things are going, we’re not there yet at the Folio level, and don’t need to change it — yet.  

 

I have more to say in response to Stace (excellent discussion, by the way), but that will take a bit more time to compose.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 12:35 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:36 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

But there are reasons for the requirement other than “because it is in the rules”.

I’m a “keep the rules simple, let the judges sort it out” kind of guy.

But if you wanted to go down the path of figuring out what the rules should really be, I’m going to suggest that we look at how fashion design, fashion illustration and costume designs are submitted to the people creating garments (or pattern makers) in the real/professional world. Sure, they may have just as much “because that’s the way we’ve always done it” going on, but they may also better explain the reasons for doing things in a standard way…

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2826 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/1/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

A agree with you Stace. ^_^

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


Stace wrote”

 

 “For sheer logistics’ sake it’s easier to just say “this is what we want, take it or leave it.” ”

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2827 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 


 

 

On Jun 1, 2015, at 1:18 PM, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Of course I’ve not run one or even submitted a design, but I’ve always wanted to. I’ve always eyeballed the rules every single year, but it turns out I just don’t have a design bone in my body. I do have the perspective of someone who would create one of the designs if one grabbed me, someone who is a replicator.

Yes, collaging in the general sense is still “art.” There is nothing wrong with creating “art” in that mien, with the possible exception of using other people’s copyrighted material without permission. However, as I understand the Future Fashion Design Contest, we’re not out to create ART, we’re out to design clothing that hasn’t been conceived of before, which costumers can then build from the design. So, “but this is the future of artistic expression!” is a moot argument.

Excellent point.

Byron


Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

They are taking photos they find on the internet -public domain stuff, but not always – isolating, say, a boot, using Photo shop and Illustrator, changing the shape, taking some texture from some other photo or clip art site, overlaying that, and basically “collaging” together a design they have in their mind of a total outfit.   What they are objecting to, to some extent, is having to submit a line drawing.    They couldn’t quite understand why line drawings were necessary.   When explained that it removed distractions from detail, and that the text that should accompany the design should give direction as to how to decorate, use of material, etc., the question was, ” Why?”   They understood when the Folio (at CC) first started that computer art rendering wasn’t around and costs were high for producing it but now that stuff was produced on PDFs and there’s no printing, why not embrace the new ways  people were rendering with computers.   They pointed out how there is a gray area with the way artists in other mediums borrow from other sources, reinterpret or manipulate in another medium and it’s considered original Art.

To their mind, a black and white rendering was their compromise – they still weren’t understanding the necessity of leaving out the textures and other details, leaving a “wireframe” rendering.  They believe that by having to reinterpret it to line drawings, it will corrupt the “cleanness” of what they designed.   They reasoned that a “literal” person could follow the rendered design  and reproduce it exactly, but  people with a more “subjective eye” (like themselves)  could look at their finished piece and  interpret it how they wished.     I don’t think they were quite grasping the point of Folio designs and I wasn’t able to articulate the necessity for line drawings.   They asked “Is it in the Constitution that there must be line drawings”, and I said, “of course not”, but apparently they seem to think that by requiring a line drawing,  it excludes what is an emerging art form.   All they are seeing, I think, is the production and judging end of the reason, and not the design reason (“It’s still my design from my head”) .   After all, it’s all going to come out on a computer PDF for the most part, and judges will probably stop looking at paper and view it all on their tablets’, etc.   Maybe not right now, but in the hot too different future.  

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2828 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

I partially understand the question that still comes back to “why”.   Many of us would brook at the “because we said so!” answer we remember with irritation.   But I think the best explanation is still being able to see the without the clutter and textures so as to get a better idea of construction.    And then one says “That’s the way we want it.   Period.”   For my part, I think they are overestimating the usage of photo manipulation for design work.  Most people will still start with a line drawing and work to detail, not backward.  This costumer started with a “finished product” and was reluctant to reduce it to the basics because it would supposedly not come out as cleanly.   Well, that’s the drawback to putting all that detail in there without “guidelines”.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:45 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

A agree with you Stace. ^_^

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

Stace wrote”

 “For sheer logistics’ sake it’s easier to just say “this is what we want, take it or leave it.” “

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2829 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

Could a compromise be made that one could submit a more complicated drawing as long as they ALSO submitted a line work version? Maybe then both ideas would be satisfied?

 

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:45:26 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

I partially understand the question that still comes back to “why”.   Many of us would brook at the “because we said so!” answer we remember with irritation.   But I think the best explanation is still being able to see the without the clutter and textures so as to get a better idea of construction.    And then one says “That’s the way we want it.   Period.”   For my part, I think they are overestimating the usage of photo manipulation for design work.  Most people will still start with a line drawing and work to detail, not backward.  This costumer started with a “finished product” and was reluctant to reduce it to the basics because it would supposedly not come out as cleanly.   Well, that’s the drawback to putting all that detail in there without “guidelines”.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:45 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

A agree with you Stace. ^_^

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

Stace wrote”

 “For sheer logistics’ sake it’s easier to just say “this is what we want, take it or leave it.” “

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2830 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Could a compromise be made that one could submit a more complicated drawing as long as they ALSO submitted a line work version? Maybe then both ideas would be satisfied?

That’s how color/extra views were always handled in the past: a line drawing so builders have an idea what they are trying for, and color/detail views to help get as close as possible. The difference is that with electronic distribution we can offer a richer variety of alternate views.

Perhaps it could be clarified by noting to the artist who is protesting that the line drawing is like the view on the back of a pattern envelope.
Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 2831 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

 

That was what they were told – “thank you for the submission, please send me a B&W line drawing in addition” and you have plenty of time.

I’m always happy to take additional views, color renderings, photo collages, etc. Since we produce an electronic Folio now I can include these without extra printing costs.

 

Nora

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 6:52 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question


Could a compromise be made that one could submit a more complicated drawing as long as they ALSO submitted a line work version? Maybe then both ideas would be satisfied?

 

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:45:26 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

I partially understand the question that still comes back to “why”.   Many of us would brook at the “because we said so!” answer we remember with irritation.   But I think the best explanation is still being able to see the without the clutter and textures so as to get a better idea of construction.    And then one says “That’s the way we want it.   Period.”   For my part, I think they are overestimating the usage of photo manipulation for design work.  Most people will still start with a line drawing and work to detail, not backward.  This costumer started with a “finished product” and was reluctant to reduce it to the basics because it would supposedly not come out as cleanly.   Well, that’s the drawback to putting all that detail in there without “guidelines”.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:45 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

A agree with you Stace. ^_^

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

Stace wrote”

 “For sheer logistics’ sake it’s easier to just say “this is what we want, take it or leave it.” “

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2832 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/3/2015
Subject: Re: Fashion folio Requirements/style/artist question

 

Kevin wrote: “Perhaps it could be clarified by noting to the artist who is protesting that the line drawing is like the view on the back of a pattern envelope.”

AWESOME way of explaining it Kevin! 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


 

.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2833 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

 

 

So, time one
again for a review of the most recent Costume-Con.   Our group likes to thoroughly analyze a con
in anticipation of the next one.  We discuss
what we liked and didn’t like and then I bring it here to add to the runacc list “knowledge
base”, spark discussion and hopefully help future organizers avoid common
mistakes.   These are merely our
opinions, and observations made not just based on what was experienced as convention
attendees, but also convention veterans who have run a CC and/or have served on
multiple concoms.   By no means are our opinions the “final word”, but we’ve been told we’re generally accurate and always an interesting read.

 

 

This year’s
CC was in stark contrast to last year’s CC32 record attendance.
We can’t help but believe that this was partly due to frequent and
different breakdowns of communication at both the staff and convention
interaction level.  Granted, some of the
problems were beyond the concom’s control, but many problems could have been
easily avoided.  

 

 

So, let’s start with pre-con
stuff.    The Committee heads, if you remember, were a trio of
“old school” costumers who only moved to Charleston, SC about a year
ago.   They are not very social media savvy, despite having a FB
page.   Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate.  Because
they were relative newcomers, they hadn’t had much time to put down very deep
roots in the local fan population.  A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16
& 25, we realized that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of
people within a 300 mile radius of the host city.   Yet, when we got
to the con, it  looked to us as though there were very few locals or
regional people.   It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast
CC from the 1990s.  That’s good, but also bad. 

 

 

 

 

 

Facebook is a
great tool for promotion, and yet,  the CC33 page was
underutilized.   As near as we can tell, they expected people to go
out to the convention website to get most any information.  That’s where
the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were
found.  The Facebook page could have been used to get news out – they
really didn’t do much of that until around December last year – that’s out of
the three years between the site selection and the event.  The rest of the
time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers or
tourist stuff about Charleston.  We’ve said this in the past – con
committees should have a “communications officer” whose sole job is to
constantly come  up with content and be comfortable with social
media.  No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other
forums.    The website was updated infrequently, and sometimes
was missing info.   Case in point: Apparently, rules Nora had written
for the Folio Show were missing until Karen pointed it out.   To
their credit, at least they fixed the problem quickly, but still…..

 

 

 

 

 

(Side note: it’s
been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com site does not update for the
next year’s countdown.  Not sure how that works, but Karen Schnaubelt
ought to just put it out of its misery and use the .org site.   It’s
just a placeholder, anyway.)

 

 

 

 

 

The Progress
Reports were only electronic, as has been the case for the past few
years.  But as near as we can tell, it was never announced when each
one was posted.   Not on the FB page, not on the D list –
nowhere.   Maybe they sent notices to those who were
registered?   The PR#3 had the most pertinent content – the rest was
mostly fluff.

 

 

 

 

 

Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate.  As near as
we can tell, there appeared to be a great reliance on word of mouth to bring in
new members.   This opinion is based on what
appeared to be a low newbie to veteran ratio.
A long time ago, when we ran
CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a convention’s attendees will be made
up of people within a 300 mile radius of the host city.   Yet, when we got to the con, it  looked to us as though there were very few
locals or regional people.   It looked
like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s.  That was nice in some ways, because we got to see some friends we only see once a year, but it’s also not good. 

 

 

As near
as we can tell, it was expected that people should go out to the convention website
to get most any information.  That’s
where the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were
found.  The convention website was updated infrequently, and sometimes was missing info.    At times, it was a struggle for some staff to get it updated, even when the webmaster was notified.  

 (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com site does not update for the next year’s countdown.  Not sure how that works, but maybe it ought to just put it out of its misery and use the .org site.   It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)

Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet,  the CC33 FB page was underutilized.  No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other forums (although, this may be less important these days).  The CC33 Facebook page could have been
used to get news out – but that didn’t really happen until around December last
year – that’s in the three years between the site selection and the
event.  The rest of the time, the page
was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers or tourist stuff about
Charleston.   

 

 

We’ve said
this in the past – con committees should have a “communications officer” whose
sole job is to constantly come up with content and be comfortable with social
media.    So far, CC34 has been making some efforts – they’ve even been producing some online promotional
video content.  

 

 

Progress
Reports:  As near as we can tell, it was never
announced when each one was posted to the website.   Not
on the FB page, not on the D list – nowhere.
Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered?

Recommendations for future concoms :  

Make greater use of social media, especially, when trying to reach new members.

Have a staffer whose specific task is to come up with content – preferably someone not doing anything else major at the con, either.   They should function as sort of a newsletter editor, constantly looking for content to post.   They should build up a store of news items from the major department heads that they can “squirt out” every so often.   Either that, or have the event heads be sure to post something of interest every so often.   Many people are not familiar with CC – put some factoids out there, so that new people aren’t coming in not knowing what to expect.

BROADCAST INFO OVER ALL PLATFORMS: Twitter, FB, the website, the ICG-D list, etc.   Don’t ignore any opportunities to promote anything new and get people talking, and don’t favor one platform over another.  

Have staffers on Facebook share any posts off the convention FB page.   This way, you’re not only reaching those who follow the page, but it also broadcasts it to all their friends who may only be on the fringe of the costuming community.  Staffers should also invite their FB friends to Like the convention FB page.  Also, find and join costuming related FB pages so you can share info about CC.   In recent talks with the CC34 staff, it’s been determined that communications among cosplayers has decentralized, and now there are FB pages dedicated to the regions or venues where they are most likely to attend.   As an example, “STL Cosplayers Unite” (St. Louis area) has 621 members.   There are lots of Steampunk groups out there that should be investigated, too.  Don’t forget that huge following of people on the Historical clothing Yahoo Group, either.   Did you know there is a specific FB page  called the “Future Fashion Design Center”?

CC34 has come up with some really nice full color post card sized flyers.   These seem to work better than the old school 8″x10″ ones these days, and are more eye-catching   They’re also not as expensive to print as they use to be.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2834 From: spiritof_76 Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

Speaking from experience, running a Costume-Con in a city with little to
no ICG presence is very difficult, let alone running one in a city
several states away from where the con-chairs live. I had three long
years of local convention promotion at about a half dozen conventions
per year, in a city where I had been a convention regular for over 10
years. Granted most locals did not seriously consider attending CC31
until about a year out. People who are accustomed to only attending the
same local conventions from year to year, only make plans a year out.
And people who have never voted on a convention are completely flumoxed
by concept. Based on my experiences, a year out of local promotion
could have been enough time to drum up local interest, if they had
already had an established presence in the local community.

Social Media has become a huge job, even more so than just an
Advertising person in the past. The internet is too vast for one person
to monitor and update across all social media platforms and forums.
There are tools like HootSuite to automate posting across multiple
social media platforms, but it’s still a huge job for one person. In
one of our ConCom meetings, one person asked if I had posted anything
about the convention on a specific forum for new mothers which she
belonged to, because many women on there make costumes for their kids.
Before I could answer, another committee member chimed in that it should
be the responsibility of every committee member to promote the
convention in the places that they frequent, whether that is in person
or on the internet.

Michael
CC31

On 2015-06-05 20:58, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:
> So, time one again for a review of the most recent Costume-Con. Our
> group likes to thoroughly analyze a con in anticipation of the next
> one. We discuss what we liked and didn’t like and then I bring it
> here to add to the runacc list “knowledge base”, spark discussion
> and hopefully help future organizers avoid common mistakes. These are
> merely our opinions, and observations made not just based on what was
> experienced as convention attendees, but also convention veterans who
> have run a CC and/or have served on multiple concoms. By no means are
> our opinions the “final word”, but we’ve been told we’re generally
> accurate and always an interesting read.
>
> This year’s CC was in stark contrast to last year’s CC32 record
> attendance. We can’t help but believe that this was partly due to
> frequent and different breakdowns of communication at both the staff
> and convention interaction level. Granted, some of the problems were
> beyond the concom’s control, but many problems could have been
> easily avoided.
>
> So, let’s start with pre-con stuff. The Committee heads, if you
> remember, were a trio of “old school” costumers who only moved to
> Charleston, SC about a year ago. They are not very social media savvy,
> despite having a FB page. Promotion of the con was woefully
> inadequate. Because they were relative newcomers, they hadn’t had
> much time to put down very deep roots in the local fan population. A
> long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a
> convention’s attendees will be made up of people within a 300 mile
> radius of the host city. Yet, when we got to the con, it looked to us
> as though there were very few locals or regional people. It looked
> like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s. That’s
> good, but also bad.
>
> Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet, the CC33 page was
> underutilized. As near as we can tell, they expected people to go out
> to the convention website to get most any information. That’s where
> the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports
> were found. The Facebook page could have been used to get news out –
> they really didn’t do much of that until around December last year
> – that’s out of the three years between the site selection and the
> event. The rest of the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff
> about the con officers or tourist stuff about Charleston. We’ve said
> this in the past – con committees should have a “communications
> officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up with content and be
> comfortable with social media. No attempt was made to ever get on
> Cosplay.com or other forums. The website was updated infrequently, and
> sometimes was missing info. Case in point: Apparently, rules Nora had
> written for the Folio Show were missing until Karen pointed it out. To
> their credit, at least they fixed the problem quickly, but still…..
>
> (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com
> site does not update for the next year’s countdown. Not sure how
> that works, but Karen Schnaubelt ought to just put it out of its
> misery and use the .org site. It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)
>
> The Progress Reports were only electronic, as has been the case for
> the past few years. But as near as we can tell, it was never announced
> when each one was posted. Not on the FB page, not on the D list –
> nowhere. Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered? The
> PR#3 had the most pertinent content – the rest was mostly fluff.
>
> Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate. As near as we can tell,
> there appeared to be a great reliance on word of mouth to bring in new
> members. This opinion is based on what appeared to be a low newbie to
> veteran ratio. A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized
> that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of people
> within a 300 mile radius of the host city. Yet, when we got to the
> con, it looked to us as though there were very few locals or regional
> people. It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the
> 1990s. That was nice in some ways, because we got to see some friends
> we only see once a year, but it’s also not good.
>
> As near as we can tell, it was expected that people should go out to
> the convention website to get most any information. That’s where the
> occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were
> found. The convention website was updated infrequently, and sometimes
> was missing info. At times, it was a struggle for some staff to get it
> updated, even when the webmaster was notified.
>
> (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com
> site does not update for the next year’s countdown. Not sure how
> that works, but maybe it ought to just put it out of its misery and
> use the .org site. It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)
>
> Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet, the CC33 FB page was
> underutilized. No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other
> forums (although, this may be less important these days). The CC33
> Facebook page could have been used to get news out – but that
> didn’t really happen until around December last year – that’s in
> the three years between the site selection and the event. The rest of
> the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers
> or tourist stuff about Charleston.
>
> We’ve said this in the past – con committees should have a
> “communications officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up
> with content and be comfortable with social media. So far, CC34 has
> been making some efforts – they’ve even been producing some online
> promotional video content.
>
> Progress Reports: As near as we can tell, it was never announced when
> each one was posted to the website. Not on the FB page, not on the D
> list – nowhere. Maybe they sent notices to those who were
> registered?
>
> Recommendations for future concoms :
>
> Make greater use of social media, especially, when trying to reach new
> members.
>
> Have a staffer whose specific task is to come up with content –
> preferably someone not doing anything else major at the con, either.
> They should function as sort of a newsletter editor, constantly
> looking for content to post. They should build up a store of news
> items from the major department heads that they can “squirt out” every
> so often. Either that, or have the event heads be sure to post
> something of interest every so often. Many people are not familiar
> with CC – put some factoids out there, so that new people aren’t
> coming in not knowing what to expect.
>
> BROADCAST INFO OVER ALL PLATFORMS: Twitter, FB, the website, the ICG-D
> list, etc. Don’t ignore any opportunities to promote anything new and
> get people talking, and don’t favor one platform over another.
>
> Have staffers on Facebook share any posts off the convention FB page.
> This way, you’re not only reaching those who follow the page, but it
> also broadcasts it to all their friends who may only be on the fringe
> of the costuming community. Staffers should also invite their FB
> friends to Like the convention FB page. Also, find and join costuming
> related FB pages so you can share info about CC. In recent talks with
> the CC34 staff, it’s been determined that communications among
> cosplayers has decentralized, and now there are FB pages dedicated to
> the regions or venues where they are most likely to attend. As an
> example, “STL Cosplayers Unite” (St. Louis area) has 621 members.
> There are lots of Steampunk groups out there that should be
> investigated, too. Don’t forget that huge following of people on the
> Historical clothing Yahoo Group, either. Did you know there is a
> specific FB page called the “Future Fashion Design Center”?
>
> CC34 has come up with some really nice full color post card sized
> flyers. These seem to work better than the old school 8″x10″ ones
> these days, and are more eye-catching They’re also not as expensive to
> print as they use to be.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 2835 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

I cannot stress enough how important promotions are no matter how big your local community is how many clubs there are.

I know the common mythology about CC32 is that we had high attendance because we have a large cosplay community in the

Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal triangle, but quite frankly nothing could be further from the truth.
We had to get out and talk up Costume-Con to people and convince them to come. We worked hard on the
cosplay community because it was new to them. We figured the Klingons, Bad Wolves, Steampunk clubs, the replicators, 501st, renfaire and SCA people, the historical societies, and the Ontario Costume Society, etc (basically anybody old school) would come out with just postcard drops and a few promo tables. !!! NOPE !!!
We got very few attendees from those, (quite large) crowds, and most of them were personal friends or friends of friends.
The mean and potatoes of our membership, (setting aside CC regulars), were those people we shook down at
Anime/new media cons, and did outreach to in the form of panels, heavily attended promo tables, and prize promotions, etc.

We* had to work  the crowd hard, and this is something I’ve been trying to desperately stress to future Costume-Con committees.

~Dawn

* We being Maral, Dawn, assorted friends and most gracious fellow Costume-Con table minders. TEAM EFFORT! <3
Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:20:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

Speaking from experience, running a Costume-Con in a city with little to
no ICG presence is very difficult, let alone running one in a city
several states away from where the con-chairs live. I had three long
years of local convention promotion at about a half dozen conventions
per year, in a city where I had been a convention regular for over 10
years. Granted most locals did not seriously consider attending CC31
until about a year out. People who are accustomed to only attending the
same local conventions from year to year, only make plans a year out.
And people who have never voted on a convention are completely flumoxed
by concept. Based on my experiences, a year out of local promotion
could have been enough time to drum up local interest, if they had
already had an established presence in the local community.

Social Media has become a huge job, even more so than just an
Advertising person in the past. The internet is too vast for one person
to monitor and update across all social media platforms and forums.
There are tools like HootSuite to automate posting across multiple
social media platforms, but it’s still a huge job for one person. In
one of our ConCom meetings, one person asked if I had posted anything
about the convention on a specific forum for new mothers which she
belonged to, because many women on there make costumes for their kids.
Before I could answer, another committee member chimed in that it should
be the responsibility of every committee member to promote the
convention in the places that they frequent, whether that is in person
or on the internet.

Michael
CC31

On 2015-06-05 20:58, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] wrote:
> So, time one again for a review of the most recent Costume-Con. Our
> group likes to thoroughly analyze a con in anticipation of the next
> one. We discuss what we liked and didn’t like and then I bring it
> here to add to the runacc list “knowledge base”, spark discussion
> and hopefully help future organizers avoid common mistakes. These are
> merely our opinions, and observations made not just based on what was
> experienced as convention attendees, but also convention veterans who
> have run a CC and/or have served on multiple concoms. By no means are
> our opinions the “final word”, but we’ve been told we’re generally
> accurate and always an interesting read.
>
> This year’s CC was in stark contrast to last year’s CC32 record
> attendance. We can’t help but believe that this was partly due to
> frequent and different breakdowns of communication at both the staff
> and convention interaction level. Granted, some of the problems were
> beyond the concom’s control, but many problems could have been
> easily avoided.
>
> So, let’s start with pre-con stuff. The Committee heads, if you
> remember, were a trio of “old school” costumers who only moved to
> Charleston, SC about a year ago. They are not very social media savvy,
> despite having a FB page. Promotion of the con was woefully
> inadequate. Because they were relative newcomers, they hadn’t had
> much time to put down very deep roots in the local fan population. A
> long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a
> convention’s attendees will be made up of people within a 300 mile
> radius of the host city. Yet, when we got to the con, it looked to us
> as though there were very few locals or regional people. It looked
> like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s. That’s
> good, but also bad.
>
> Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet, the CC33 page was
> underutilized. As near as we can tell, they expected people to go out
> to the convention website to get most any information. That’s where
> the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports
> were found. The Facebook page could have been used to get news out –
> they really didn’t do much of that until around December last year
> – that’s out of the three years between the site selection and the
> event. The rest of the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff
> about the con officers or tourist stuff about Charleston. We’ve said
> this in the past – con committees should have a “communications
> officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up with content and be
> comfortable with social media. No attempt was made to ever get on
> Cosplay.com or other forums. The website was updated infrequently, and
> sometimes was missing info. Case in point: Apparently, rules Nora had
> written for the Folio Show were missing until Karen pointed it out. To
> their credit, at least they fixed the problem quickly, but still…..
>
> (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com
> site does not update for the next year’s countdown. Not sure how
> that works, but Karen Schnaubelt ought to just put it out of its
> misery and use the .org site. It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)
>
> The Progress Reports were only electronic, as has been the case for
> the past few years. But as near as we can tell, it was never announced
> when each one was posted. Not on the FB page, not on the D list –
> nowhere. Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered? The
> PR#3 had the most pertinent content – the rest was mostly fluff.
>
> Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate. As near as we can tell,
> there appeared to be a great reliance on word of mouth to bring in new
> members. This opinion is based on what appeared to be a low newbie to
> veteran ratio. A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized
> that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of people
> within a 300 mile radius of the host city. Yet, when we got to the
> con, it looked to us as though there were very few locals or regional
> people. It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the
> 1990s. That was nice in some ways, because we got to see some friends
> we only see once a year, but it’s also not good.
>
> As near as we can tell, it was expected that people should go out to
> the convention website to get most any information. That’s where the
> occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were
> found. The convention website was updated infrequently, and sometimes
> was missing info. At times, it was a struggle for some staff to get it
> updated, even when the webmaster was notified.
>
> (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com
> site does not update for the next year’s countdown. Not sure how
> that works, but maybe it ought to just put it out of its misery and
> use the .org site. It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)
>
> Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet, the CC33 FB page was
> underutilized. No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other
> forums (although, this may be less important these days). The CC33
> Facebook page could have been used to get news out – but that
> didn’t really happen until around December last year – that’s in
> the three years between the site selection and the event. The rest of
> the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers
> or tourist stuff about Charleston.
>
> We’ve said this in the past – con committees should have a
> “communications officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up
> with content and be comfortable with social media. So far, CC34 has
> been making some efforts – they’ve even been producing some online
> promotional video content.
>
> Progress Reports: As near as we can tell, it was never announced when
> each one was posted to the website. Not on the FB page, not on the D
> list – nowhere. Maybe they sent notices to those who were
> registered?
>
> Recommendations for future concoms :
>
> Make greater use of social media, especially, when trying to reach new
> members.
>
> Have a staffer whose specific task is to come up with content –
> preferably someone not doing anything else major at the con, either.
> They should function as sort of a newsletter editor, constantly
> looking for content to post. They should build up a store of news
> items from the major department heads that they can “squirt out” every
> so often. Either that, or have the event heads be sure to post
> something of interest every so often. Many people are not familiar
> with CC – put some factoids out there, so that new people aren’t
> coming in not knowing what to expect.
>
> BROADCAST INFO OVER ALL PLATFORMS: Twitter, FB, the website, the ICG-D
> list, etc. Don’t ignore any opportunities to promote anything new and
> get people talking, and don’t favor one platform over another.
>
> Have staffers on Facebook share any posts off the convention FB page.
> This way, you’re not only reaching those who follow the page, but it
> also broadcasts it to all their friends who may only be on the fringe
> of the costuming community. Staffers should also invite their FB
> friends to Like the convention FB page. Also, find and join costuming
> related FB pages so you can share info about CC. In recent talks with
> the CC34 staff, it’s been determined that communications among
> cosplayers has decentralized, and now there are FB pages dedicated to
> the regions or venues where they are most likely to attend. As an
> example, “STL Cosplayers Unite” (St. Louis area) has 621 members.
> There are lots of Steampunk groups out there that should be
> investigated, too. Don’t forget that huge following of people on the
> Historical clothing Yahoo Group, either. Did you know there is a
> specific FB page called the “Future Fashion Design Center”?
>
> CC34 has come up with some really nice full color post card sized
> flyers. These seem to work better than the old school 8″x10″ ones
> these days, and are more eye-catching They’re also not as expensive to
> print as they use to be.
>

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2836 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion-correction

 

I of course meant “Meat an potatoes” .

“mean and potatoes” is metric for that. 😉

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

“The mean and potatoes of our membership”

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2837 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

Good review.  However, it needed editing.  Several paragraphs are repeated verbatim, everything from “Promotion of the con. . .“ through “. . . mostly fluff” appears twice.

 

Byron

 

 

On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:58 PM, casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

So, time one again for a review of the most recent Costume-Con.   Our group likes to thoroughly analyze a con in anticipation of the next one.  We discuss what we liked and didn’t like and then I bring it here to add to the runacc list “knowledge base”, spark discussion and hopefully help future organizers avoid common mistakes.   These are merely our opinions, and observations made not just based on what was experienced as convention attendees, but also convention veterans who have run a CC and/or have served on multiple concoms.   By no means are our opinions the “final word”, but we’ve been told we’re generally accurate and always an interesting read.

This year’s CC was in stark contrast to last year’s CC32 record attendance.  We can’t help but believe that this was partly due to frequent and different breakdowns of communication at both the staff and convention interaction level.  Granted, some of the problems were beyond the concom’s control, but many problems could have been easily avoided.   

So, let’s start with pre-con stuff.    The Committee heads, if you remember, were a trio of “old school” costumers who only moved to Charleston, SC about a year ago.   They are not very social media savvy, despite having a FB page.   Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate.  Because they were relative newcomers, they hadn’t had much time to put down very deep roots in the local fan population.  A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of people within a 300 mile radius of the host city.   Yet, when we got to the con, it  looked to us as though there were very few locals or regional people.   It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s.  That’s good, but also bad.  

 

Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet,  the CC33 page was underutilized.   As near as we can tell, they expected people to go out to the convention website to get most any information.  That’s where the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were found.  The Facebook page could have been used to get news out – they really didn’t do much of that until around December last year – that’s out of the three years between the site selection and the event.  The rest of the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers or tourist stuff about Charleston.  We’ve said this in the past – con committees should have a “communications officer” whose sole job is to constantly come  up with content and be comfortable with social media.  No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other forums.    The website was updated infrequently, and sometimes was missing info.   Case in point: Apparently, rules Nora had written for the Folio Show were missing until Karen pointed it out.   To their credit, at least they fixed the problem quickly, but still…..

 

(Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com site does not update for the next year’s countdown.  Not sure how that works, but Karen Schnaubelt ought to just put it out of its misery and use the .org site.   It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)

 

The Progress Reports were only electronic, as has been the case for the past few years.  But as near as we can tell, it was never announced when each one was posted.   Not on the FB page, not on the D list – nowhere.   Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered?   The PR#3 had the most pertinent content – the rest was mostly fluff.

 

Promotion of the con was woefully inadequate.  As near as we can tell, there appeared to be a great reliance on word of mouth to bring in new members.   This opinion is based on what appeared to be a low newbie to veteran ratio.      A long time ago, when we ran CCs 16 & 25, we realized that most of a convention’s attendees will be made up of people within a 300 mile radius of the host city.   Yet, when we got to the con, it  looked to us as though there were very few locals or regional people.   It looked like a smaller version of an East Coast CC from the 1990s.  That was nice in some ways, because we got to see some friends we only see once a year, but it’s also not good.  

As near as we can tell, it was expected that people should go out to the convention website to get most any information.  That’s where the occasional updates were and that’s where the Progress Reports were found.  The convention website was updated infrequently, and sometimes was missing info.    At times, it was a struggle for some staff to get it updated, even when the webmaster was notified.  

 (Side note: it’s been a problem for years that the Costume-Con.com site does not update for the next year’s countdown.  Not sure how that works, but maybe it ought to just put it out of its misery and use the .org site.   It’s just a placeholder, anyway.)

Facebook is a great tool for promotion, and yet,  the CC33 FB page was underutilized.  No attempt was made to ever get on Cosplay.com or other forums (although, this may be less important these days).  The CC33 Facebook page could have been used to get news out – but that didn’t really happen until around December last year – that’s in the three years between the site selection and the event.  The rest of the time, the page was mostly about funny stuff about the con officers or tourist stuff about Charleston.    

We’ve said this in the past – con committees should have a “communications officer” whose sole job is to constantly come up with content and be comfortable with social media.    So far, CC34 has been making some efforts – they’ve even been producing some online promotional video content.  

Progress Reports:  As near as we can tell, it was never announced when each one was posted to the website.   Not on the FB page, not on the D list – nowhere.   Maybe they sent notices to those who were registered?   


Recommendations for future concoms :  

Make greater use of social media, especially, when trying to reach new members.
 
Have a staffer whose specific task is to come up with content – preferably someone not doing anything else major at the con, either.   They should function as sort of a newsletter editor, constantly looking for content to post.   They should build up a store of news items from the major department heads that they can “squirt out” every so often.   Either that, or have the event heads be sure to post something of interest every so often.   Many people are not familiar with CC – put some factoids out there, so that new people aren’t coming in not knowing what to expect.   

BROADCAST INFO OVER ALL PLATFORMS: Twitter, FB, the website, the ICG-D list, etc.   Don’t ignore any opportunities to promote anything new and get people talking, and don’t favor one platform over another.   

Have staffers on Facebook share any posts off the convention FB page.   This way, you’re not only reaching those who follow the page, but it also broadcasts it to all their friends who may only be on the fringe of the costuming community.  Staffers should also invite their FB friends to Like the convention FB page.  Also, find and join costuming related FB pages so you can share info about CC.   In recent talks with the CC34 staff, it’s been determined that communications among cosplayers has decentralized, and now there are FB pages dedicated to the regions or venues where they are most likely to attend.   As an example, “STL Cosplayers Unite” (St. Louis area) has 621 members.   There are lots of Steampunk groups out there that should be investigated, too.  Don’t forget that huge following of people on the Historical clothing Yahoo Group, either.   Did you know there is a specific FB page  called the “Future Fashion Design Center”?

CC34 has come up with some really nice full color post card sized flyers.   These seem to work better than the old school 8″x10″ ones these days, and are more eye-catching   They’re also not as expensive to print as they use to be.  


 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2838 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion
You’re right, it IS the responsibility of all the committee to promote, but there still should be someone to coordinate – people are less likely to be motivated on their own.   They need to keep the cats focused.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2839 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

Ah, I’m not seeing that when I look at it.   I just checked it twice..

 

 

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2840 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Future Fashion Folio

 

 

 

This
publication, distributed prior to the convention will be recorded as one of the
worst in the convention’s history.    As
near as we can tell, there must have been a heavy reliance on the convention regulars and
tradition to get the word out about it, because the only evidence we can find
of promotion was on the website and 1 email back in July.   There may have been promoting  elsewhere on other lists they belong to, but
FB and the ICG-D list are the primary forums for reaching a majority of the
potential attendees.   The only content
found about the rules for the Folio were on the website and PR #2.

 

 

This  lack of promotion HAD to have been a factor
in the serious lag in submissions, resulting in the submission deadline being pushed back
at least once.   Some people didn’t know
about the extension because that announcement was not made widely.  

 

 

While
selecting judges from 3 different time zones might be doable these days, thanks
to the Internet, there were coordination difficulties.  The Editor insisted on routing only one set of
the submissions to one judge at a time, rather than providing  them to all three simultaneously.    Once the judges had all finally made their
own reviews, they supposedly Skyped to confer.
This process, and then the time taken for publication, took until late
February.

 

 

The con
chairs should have been monitoring the situation and either replaced the
Editor  or advised them to come up with a
better solution like finding local judges in their area.  However, because one of the con chairs had their
own health issues, thus their co-chair/spouse was distracted. 

 

 

Finally, the
link to the finished Folio was sent out on March 6 – less than 10 weeks from
the convention.    There was no
announcement on the D list, no announcement on the FB page.   There
should have been a greater effort to get the word out about it – people are
lazy and won’t seek it out.  And once the
link was sent, not everyone could open the PDF file.   

 

 

As for the
content of the Folio, while there was a claim that there were “so many designs”, there were only 5 designers, with only 96 published pages, which
included some blanks to assure that it would print out formatted
correctly.   

 

 

The recognition
system of “you’re either in the Folio or not” was discarded in favor of 1st,
2nd and 3rd places and people didn’t like it.
Even when the Folio finally came out, most of the designs left people
uninspired – we heard this from several people at the con, not just our own
people.   (Maybe this is a panel for the
next CC – can design be taught?)    Many
of the designs were too complicated to be able to be completed in the short
amount of time left.    

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2841 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – The Hotel

 

 

 

Many
different opinions and experiences with the hotel.  It was certainly convenient to get to.   FREE PARKING(!).   The worst thing we had was Housekeeping was
sometimes a little slow delivering supplies.
The elevators were quick.   The
staff was all mostly friendly.   We
didn’t see the amount of wear others saw.

 

 

The hotel
food was not bad, the prices typical for the area.   But not everyone had the same experiences.

 

 

“I
didn’t particularly care for the attitude of the staff in the restaurant.
“We’re usually not open for lunch, we’re just doing this for your
group.”  Said with a kind of put-out tone of voice.  That really
put me off the place so we never ate there again.” 

 

 

Another commenter:

 

 

“Restaurant
was OK for breakfast. It was nice to be able to pay for the buffet in advance
so we could just leave when we were done, rather than waiting forever for the
check. We only ate there once for dinner (time crunch) and the buffet fare was
definitely not worth the $18 price. Staff was OK for us. We don’t usually eat
lunch at a con, so didn’t encounter the lunch problem.”

 

 

 While there were no restaurants within walking
distance, there were several within 5 minutes driving time.   Supposedly, the hotel shuttle would take you
anywhere you wanted to go within a 3 mile radius for free.  There was also one that would take you
downtown, to the visitor’s bureau.
There was no hot tub, but there was an indoor/outdoor pool.    Perhaps hot tubs are not as big a thing in
the South?

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2842 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Registration

 

 

 

At least
some registration stuff was there to pick up Thursday evening, but there was
apparently some miscommunication about giving out the complete packets, so some
of people had to pick up the rest the next day.    

 

 

“This one really confused me. The swag
bags were ready. I know. I stuffed them all on Tuesday night. I’m not sure why
they weren’t available Thursday night.”

 

 

There were not enough people to man
Registration and we saw one person who appeared to be spending an awful lot of
time behind the table.  This seemed to be
a recurring indicator that the con was understaffed.  

 

 

To us the
“swag bag” was not much to write home about.
There was no map of the hotel, but the layout was relatively simple and
the few meeting rooms used were all together in one place, save for a board
room on the third floor (which was hard to find at first until someone posted a
handwritten sign).  

 

 

The program
book was minimal at best and had a number of errors, mostly regarding info
about the panels (missing descriptions or no description at all in one or two
cases). 

 

 

“The program book broke down as
follows:

 

 

32 pages including front
cover. 

 

 

2 blank pages (inside of front
cover and front side of back page). 

 

 

No back cover. 

 

 

Letter from con chairs 1
page. 

 

 

Panel descriptions 3 pages, some of
which had no description in the program book.

 

 

Harassment Policy: 2 pages

 

 

Bios – 6 pages

 

 

Ads – 3 pages, two half page
ads and 2 full page ads

 

 

Costume Con Constitution – 9 pages

 

 

Other articles – 6 pages (Miss
Lizzy’s Travelling Historical Fashion Show, Astronaut Quilt, Richard Man:
Transformations: Cosplay, List of past CostumeCons).

 

 

The two blank pages were a real
waste of space.  The letters from the Co-chairs could have been
photocopied onto the back of the front cover and the Rare Recorded Videos ad
moved up a page, saving a page.  I find it curious that there was no ad
space for any of the upcoming Costume Cons.  I think blank pages would be
better used by including some traceable human figures, one male and one female
and perhaps some info on the upcoming Future Fashion Folio.

 

 

The list of past CostumeCons was
nice and would have made the Con Chair’s toast at the dead dog party a lot
easier, if there had been a dead dog party.

 

 

Local
Guide –
 Not quite as helpful as one
would have liked.  We actually needed to find the Walmart listed on the
guide.  It took a lot of driving around on the other side of the
highway.  There are lots of signs there claiming the presence of a
Walmart, but none of them point you in the proper direction.  A simple
hand drawn map would have cleared all that up.  Another thing lacking on
the local guide is some useful info about laws in the area.  It took a
wasted trip to the liquor store to discover that liquor stores in SC are not
allowed to sell beer.”

 

 

The
programming schedule grid sheet was hard to read correctly, leading people to
misread start times by 30 minutes.
There ought to be a better software out there for these kinds of things.  If something exists, it could be shared from
year to year.

 

 

“This suffered from the usual lack
of basic knowledge of Excel.  It’s a simple thing to merge cells together
vertically and center the time so that you know for sure that this line means
9:00 and that line means 9:30.  There was some real confusion caused by
the pocket program about whether certain panels started at 1:00 or 1:30.
Having each day on its own page did make for some simple folding to display at
a glance what was coming up on that day.”

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2843 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Friday Night

 

 

 

The pre-judging
time for the Single Pattern Contest was posted in the “stealth PR”.   At the con, in at least one case, a
contestant was told the rehearsal was 2:00 PM.
As it turned out, there did not appear to be a rehearsal and there was
some scrambling to get down to the ballroom for judging.   Bottom line: there should have been more
announcements about the first competition of the con.  In any case, the show went off without a
hitch, other than the MC mispronouncing
titles of entries. 
Nora
picked up my pre-reg form because I was elsewhere, and she was told that the

rehearsal
was at 2 PM.  When I found out it was actualy for
pre-judging, I had to scramble.   The only notice I found later about
the time was in the “stealth PR” #3.    This information should
have been announced on the FB page and the D list, like other info.


Unfortunatlely, the choice for MC was not the best, resulting in awkward pauses
and mispronunciations.   Otherwise, the show went off without much of
a hitch.

 

 

As for the Social itself, the food spread was better
than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out of protein –always a good
thing.  Attendees did play along with the speakeasy theme,
costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad wine
and bad soda.   Leftovers from the Social were moved to Hospitality –
including the huge amounts of leftovers of birthday sheetcake for one of the
co-chairs.   The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least
seating was adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

 

 

As for the Social
itself, the food spread was better than some pasr CCs, and it did not run out
of protein –always a good thing.  (It
would have been nice if arrangements had been made so that the people backstage
didn’t miss out on some of that protein, though). 

 

 

Attendees
did play along with the speakeasy theme, costume-wise.    The bar had a selection of bad beer, bad
wine and bad soda.   Leftovers from the
Social were moved to Hospitality – including the huge amounts of leftover
birthday cake for one of the co-chairs.
The spinning light gobos were annoying, but at least seating was
adequate and the house lights were not down too low.

 

 

“I liked the free drink ticket.  It would
have been nice if there were something worth drinking for free.
Charleston has some fine microbreweries.  I don’t understand not having at
least one of them as a choice for a beer.  The food was the same stuff
from the con suite.  I have to resurrect a comment from a CC in the
past.  Deja Food.  Didn’t I just eat this.  Something that was a
little amusing was the drawing they kept trying to have, only to have the
person giving out the tickets scream that she was still handing them out.
Perhaps these tickets should have gone in the swag bag, like the drink
ticket.  Just a thought.”

 

 

There was also this:

 

“The
Friday Night Social was sold as featuring a variety of southern specialties. In
reality, there was nothing except cheese trays and peach cobbler..…”
(Not strictly true – there were pulled pork
sandwiches, and the cobbler, for itself, was excellent)   “…Earlier on Friday, I heard
some members suggesting that they could opt to skip dinner; I hope they didn’t
do so.”

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2844 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Programming

 

 

 

The
Programming person was noticeably distracted by personal events, leading up to
the last few months of the con. 

 

 

There were
misgivings about a peer having their way paid as guest – not sure what
precedent that might set in the future.
Opinions were mixed as to the variety of panels and demos, so there was
no consensus one way or another.    Most
people liked what they saw.   

 

 

“There was a decent variety, just
not enough of them. “

 

 

 

It’s hard to
strike that right balance of enough and not enough.   Not enough, people get bored.   Too many, then they complain about having to
choose between panels.   One possibility
might be to have more panels, but repeat some of them.

 

 

 

 

 

“Also, the staggered start and
end times were confusing and usually meant I either had to miss the last part
of one, or the first part of another.”

 

 

 

 

 

“My biggest issue was there was nowhere that said who was on what
panels – so if you were on a panel and didn’t know what name it was in the
program, you couldn’t find it. Also, if you were looking for someone in
particular, no way to find what panel they might be on so you could find them.”

 

 

 

 

 

The fact
that this was not a very big con probably explains why the Friday and Saturday
“My First Costume-Con” panels never had more than 5 people in them.  We believe they’re still an important panel
to have, and provide an important service to newcomers – especially to let them
know about Hospitality.   One of the
newbies came all the way from North Dakota, and we suspect we have a new
convert.   

 

 

Very few
panels had less than three attendees: apparently, the panel on how the Library
of Congress is now archiving masquerade video was surprisingly well
attended(!).

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2845 From: ECM Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: Re: SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

Before the end of CC33, CC34 handed me a folder of promotional materials and asked me to spread the word in my part of the world.  That was a great idea!  For CC30, we sent fliers far and wide, both hard copy & electronically.

Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 18:01:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC33 Review – Intro and Pre-con Promotion

 

You’re right, it IS the responsibility of all the committee to promote, but there still should be someone to coordinate – people are less likely to be motivated on their own.   They need to keep the cats focused.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2846 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Hospitality

 

 

The “egg mcmuffins” the
SLCG sponsored Sunday morning in the Suite were appreciated, and several people
thanked us later for providing them.   At
least, those didn’t run out before most people who got up early enough didn’t
miss out on them.   However, had we been
reminded that the Brunch was supposed to be at 10:00 AM, we would have probably
chosen a different time to sponsor the Suite.

 

 

 

“The selection of food in the con suite got really
boring.  I’m sure this was written into the hotel contract, but those
sorts of things are always negotiable.  No hotel can make that an
absolute.  You can always go to another hotel.  Some groups did
manage to sneak some extra stuff into the room though.  I noticed the
cheese curds from the CC Madison folks and the Mead.  I mentioned before
the predilection for putting a little sugar in the unsweet tea.  I did
like having tea to drink though.  The space needed to be a little larger
and have a few more tables.  There were several mornings where Sue and I
were a little stuck for a place to sit and the love seat in the middle of the
room caused some traffic problems, some that couldn’t even be solved by leaving
one door and coming back in the other.  The room was kept relatively clean
by the hotel staff.  Aside from sugar in my unsweet tea, I can’t complain
about them much.”

 

 

The other
bright spot in the otherwise repetitive fare in Hospitality was an ice cream
social sponsored by Atomacon, a local SF con.
The one glaring item missing all weekend was soda.  All the drinks (tea, juices, etc.) were
sweetened to some extent – even the apple juice (?). 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2847 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – SF & F Masquerade

 

 

 

It will be a
recurring theme that, had the various shows been bigger, they could have been
disastrous.*   (Keep that in mind) 

 

 

For whatever
reasons, all the normal tech crews were unavailable for CC33.  Probably , just a case of bad timing.    It was fortunate that Eric and Sue were able
to bring at least a barebones tech set up along with their video
equipment.    The PR#3 said people could submit their
presentation music on either CDs or USB drives.
It turned out, though, there was limited tech – the amount of tech the
Cannons could bring was limted by  the
space in their car.   Because of that,
all MP3 files had to be burned to CDs before they could be played.   They HAD suggested people bring more than
one copy on more than one medium, but people may have not have done that, and
it was not mentioned again during registration, starting while the ICG meeting
was going on Friday – this is where the assistant to the MD could have been
utilized.    Tech COULD have run WAY
behind while the files were burned late in the day Saturday.*

 

 

Contestants
were told to arrive at the Green Room at 6:00 PM – the GR was not
prepared.   It seems they must have
started getting organized, because it was 20-30 minutes before they allowed
people in.  Not sure why people were only
allowed into the somewhat cramped space in running order, and then assigned their
den.  

 

 

“F/SF
was the worst for space. I can’t say for the FFS/Curtains, because I wasn’t
back there. Historical was tight, but not as much as F/SF……
The person arriving to do check-in was unpleasant and we had
a bit of a snip-fest at the beginning. I was trying to be efficient, and she
wanted things HER way.”

 

 

“….We
didn’t get a running order and # of people per entry until at least 6:30, so we
couldn’t set up the dens till then. It helped that the last entry was the 12
body entry, so they got the hall kind of by default. There was no way to put
them in the room.”

 

 

This made
for a longer delay.   That’s really
inefficient, especially when they were already running late.*    The contestants had to repeat their info to
different people, even though they were right next to each other – probably a
noise AND organization issue. 

 

 

The dens
were poorly set up with chairs in an oval, with no tables  – there was no space.   The contestants were told they could not use
more than one seat, so where were they supposed to put the stuff they brought
down?  Guess no one had thought of
that.   One den wound up having to be set
up out in the hall (shades of CC32)*.   

 

 

“Some
entries wouldn’t have fit into the quilt room.  We were already having
issues with exit doors – apparently the fire marshal was there and was being
picky about stuff blocking the doors.”

 

 

“…we
were having to steal chairs from the audience because there weren’t enough in
the green room for everyone.”

 

 

“In
hindsight, for F/SF, we really needed to swap the spaces of two of the dens (and
put Santa into the corner). That giant costume kept sticking out into the only
path for movement we had and catching every dangly bit that went by.”

 

 

The den moms
were given hats to wear to identify them, but apparently, no one actually
mentioned that.   Guess it was supposed
to be assumed.   The den moms were not
informed to make sure people got to the official photographer – at least not
initially.    The GR ran out of water at
some point.   It DID have a repair kit,
and it was used. 

 

 

Official
Photography took up about ¼ of the space that could have been used for Green
Room, but there was no where else to really put it.  

 

 

“I
don’t think there was really anyplace else for the photographers to go other
than in that room – the partitions were kind of arbitrary, so yes, it was 1/3
of the space. “

 

 

 The judges
were not photographed as part of the official record – not sure who would have
been responsible for making sure that happened.

 

 

Workmanship
judges were placed at the end of the main hall where the audience could
potentially see them before the show – no attempt to curtain that area off was
made (probably because it wasn’t really thought about until the last
minute). 

 

 

It was
obvious that the con had some staffing issues, since the GR Director was also
shooting the reference photos, as well as having been working Registration each
day.  Unfortunately, her assistant was
apparently not very experienced at the GR check in process.    There was also a shortage of backstage crew,
with only 3 ninjas ( I stepped in to help).

 

 

The photo
run ran without a problem, and the judges returned shortly after the video
halftime. (The Workmanship judging panel had taken a little longer to complete
deliberations).   Overall, less time
might have been taken had the printing of awards started immediately after the
Presentation judges had finished, rather than waiting for the Workmanship
results.   It was apparently a bit of a
“duh’ moment.   Regardless, awards were
fair, there were enough people recognized for their efforts, and there were no
controversies.

 

Just on recommendation here, that I remember: aprons instead of hats, and hand fans. 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2848 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – FFS and other stuph

 

 

 

There was
yet more than one lack of communication in regards to the Future Fashion Show

 

 

 

 

 

There had
been an announcement sometime late in 2014 on the FB page and (stealth) PR #3
about a Sunday Brunch and Cotillion “in conjuction” with the Future Fashion Show  at 10:00 AM
– this was the first the FFS Director learned of it, rather than via the
Staff Yahoo group.   That was supposed to
be the time when rehearsals would have been called.  The “brunch” was served – an hour late – in
the main traffic hall outside the ballroom.
A sign was posted on the door of the Ballroom, stating that the FFS
would start at 11:30 AM – again, the Director was not personally informed.   The brunch fare was slightly different
(sandwiches and deep fried mac & cheese accompanied by the déjà food, but
the protein ran out early) and the “cotillion” mostly consisted of some ladies
standing around in their hoopskirts because there was no seating and they were
not allowed to enter the ballroom while tech was going on.    Overall, it was poorly organized and poorly
executed.

 

 

There were
two factors that led to this year’s Future Fashion Show being the smallest in
the con’s history.  The first factor was
the Folio Editor’s management of the Folio, leaving little time for anyone
to consider making an outfit for the show.
And so, there were only 2 children’s entries and one adult – all three
were designed by the same person (the adult – who was not related to the
children in any way).  The Folio Show
Director made token efforts to promote the show, but it was deemed mostly of no
use, given the lateness of the Folio.  

 

 

The second
major factor that affected the Folio show was the “Miss Ellen’s Portieres”
competition.  This challenge apparently
captured the imaginations of a lot of people – the show had more entries than
the SF & F masquerade.   As a result,
the people who had intended to enter both competitions had to choose between
this or the Folio Show.    (Side note:
People in the Portiere show as contestant, staff, crew, were not accommodated
by the committee to get brunch food to them)

 

 

“Given the poor quality of the
Future Fashion Folio, it’s not surprising that there were only three entries in
the Future Fashion Show.  I think a contributing factor was scheduling the
curtain contest immediately after.  Given that the Future Fashion Show is
expressly called for in the ConStitution, I think it’s time to stop scheduling
things so that a person has to choose do I do the Future Fashion Show or do I
do this other thing.  Either move those things to the Friday Night Social,
as has been done in the past, or here’s a thought.  How about a contest
for Monday afternoon.  No one seems to schedule any programming for that
time.  Why not give us a contest?”

 

 

Another:

 

 

“Any
extra stuff needs to either go with the Single Pattern on Friday, or be a
display-only competition like shoes or ties. I think the tote-bag one that CC34
is doing is in that category, but I may be wrong”

 

 

And yet another:

 

 

“You
would think that, by now, we would have learned that putting anything in
proximity to the FFS is detrimental to the Future Fashion Show.  It’s
happened time and again.  This is something we really need to emphasize…”

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2849 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 REview – Historical

 

 

 

Prejudging
took place in the Green Room again, with the distractions of Tech Rehearsals.  There were only 10 entries in the show, so
again – good thing it was a small con.*

 

 

An
opportunity was missed to keep the judges corralled and also allow them
additional time for discussion by arranging for them to have dinner
together.   This worked at CC31. 

 

 

The Green
Room was the same size, but the contestants took up just about as much room
because of 9 people with wings, among other things.  There was only one noticeable tech snag.  Again, the feeling by people was the awards
were in adequate numbers, fair and again, no controversies.   Some of the contestants were surprised and
pleased to be recognized.   At halftime,
the quilt and doll awards announcements could have been done before the judges
got back.

Recommendation:  Make sure to allow time for judges to change to costumes before the show – your costumes are the creds on your back.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2850 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Monday

 

 

 

The Monday
tour of Charleston was… a bit disorganized.
Originally, we had to sign up ahead of time before the con and send in a
downpayment for it.   Then, we found out
a couple of weeks before we left that the tour time would slightly overlap the
Road Show time slot.   We managed to
arrange it so that we’d have 30 minutes to get stuff in the room and meet for
pick up.   Then, we were told the tour
was cancelled. During the weekend, we were told the tour was back ON again, but
even earlier than we had been told.
Fortunately, Pierre and Sandy weren’t going on the tour, so they covered
for us, and apparently had a pretty good turn out.

 

 

Upon our return
from the Charleston tour, we learned there would be no Dead Dog Party.   Supposeldy, it would take place the
following night.    What in the world
were they thinking?  

 

 

The big problem with the con suite
was that it disappeared Monday afternoon, leaving no space for the dead dog
party.  Some real lack of planning there.

Recommendation:  Maybe more should be done to try to keep people on Monday.   I think I may have suggested last year maybe having programming that would appeal more to the veterans, because it’s usually the veterans who stick around through Monday.     And for gosh sakes, don’t dismiss the Dead Dog Party!

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2851 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Dealers Room

There
were a whopping TWO dealers: one with beads, one with trim.  Both good dealers, for what they were, but….   How/why did this happen?   The story we heard was because originally,
Janet was supposed to bring  AlterYears.    At
the last minute, her travel plans changed and she had to fly instead, leaving a
huge hole in the Dealers Room.   We
suspect there had been no other dealers brought in so that Janet would no
competition or repetition of wares.
This completely backfired and it was too late to do anything about
it.  To fill space, the  convention voting table was placed there,
along with CC34’s promotion table and one for the SCA.   

 

The rest of the room was taken up by Lisa’s
“Miss LIzzy’s Travelling Historical Fashion Show”.   This was a pretty nice display of antique
women’s clothing, but it wouldn’t have been in the Dealers Room had things not
fallen through.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2852 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – One last recommendation

if
someone foresees a year before the event that there may be some personal issues that may interfere with
doing their job, there is nothing wrong with backing out – they should not feel
obligated.   Better to get out in enough time
that the position can be filled, rather than doing  a poor job and make excuses like “I’m just a volunteer”.   That is unacceptable – take responsibility or resign.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2853 From: casamai Date: 6/6/2015
Subject: SLCG CC33 Review – Exhibit Room

 

 

 

Mostly composed of a few of Janet Wilson Anderson’s competition pieces, plus
one or two others.   The Archives
provided material for a little “slide show” of Janet’s works. 

 

 

This one had one bright spot for
me.  Having been at JW Anderson’s Making New Mistakes panel and hearing
here discuss the My Fair Lady dress at some length, it was nice to be able to
go to the exhibits and see the costume and documentation right there.  A
real plus.”

 

 

 

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 56 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 56 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2754 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2755 From: tinathebookworm Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume s
Group: runacc Message: 2756 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2757 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2758 From: Vicky Young Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2759 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2760 From: Pierre and Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume s
Group: runacc Message: 2761 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace
Group: runacc Message: 2762 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Kevin and
Group: runacc Message: 2763 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2764 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups
Group: runacc Message: 2765 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Aurora
Group: runacc Message: 2766 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2767 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes- Stace again
Group: runacc Message: 2768 From: ECM Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2769 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace
Group: runacc Message: 2770 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2771 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace
Group: runacc Message: 2772 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace (& A
Group: runacc Message: 2773 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2774 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2775 From: spiritof_76 Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2776 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace
Group: runacc Message: 2777 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2778 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2779 From: ECM Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2780 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/21/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2781 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/21/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2782 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai
Group: runacc Message: 2783 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn
Group: runacc Message: 2784 From: ECM Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai
Group: runacc Message: 2785 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai
Group: runacc Message: 2786 From: ECM Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai
Group: runacc Message: 2787 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos
Group: runacc Message: 2788 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos
Group: runacc Message: 2789 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Competition FAQ for Costume-Cons
Group: runacc Message: 2790 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos
Group: runacc Message: 2791 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Competition FAQ for Costume-Cons
Group: runacc Message: 2792 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…
Group: runacc Message: 2793 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2794 From: spiritof_76 Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2795 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2796 From: Vicky Young Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2797 From: markptjan Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2798 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2799 From: herself-the-elf@rogers.com Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2800 From: grizzy1955 Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2801 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2802 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/30/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Group: runacc Message: 2803 From: Kaijugal . Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2754 From: Trudy Leonard Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I think Atlanta is still considered part of the South (CC22!). 😊
Trudy
Sent from Windows Mail
From: costumecon committee
Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎April‎ ‎17‎, ‎2015 ‎9‎:‎19‎ ‎PM
To: costumecon committee
 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.
The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.
Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).
Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.
At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.
So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.
“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.
Byron the Boring
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2755 From: tinathebookworm Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume s

You’re right, Trudy. I noticed that right away.

 

Tina C.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2756 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

I do not think so.
I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.
1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred
masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot.
2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive
costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.
I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.
The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.
Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).
Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.
At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.
So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.
“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.
Byron the Boring
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2757 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Elaine, Kevin….BRILLIANT. I will consider making the changes and running past the concomm at our next meeting. Muahahaha.

Dawn does have a point – at much larger cons, there are different habits and cultures cultivated by the sheer size and the number of opportunities for presenting a costume. Dragon*Con has ALWAYS been about showing your most spectacular costumes in the hall, not the masquerade, because the masquerade (at least in the early 2000s) had an awful reputation for not being about the quality of construction at all. Plus, every single fandom track has its own costume contest, held at random points during the day and not involving performance at all. To compete in the Star Wars costume contest you just showed up at the 2pm time slot and let the celebrities ogle you from their chairs. It’s always been “the thing to do” to spend all year building your most amazing costume and then just hang around in the Hyatt lobby to let the photographer circles cluster around you. I don’t know if that’s changed much in the last 10 years, but there you go.

I am fascinated by Byron’s history information, mainly because it might be a case of history repeating itself. Masquerades at mid-sized cons are getting swelled to bursting again, maybe it IS time to re-instill the actual rule to cut down on the number of entries. I don’t think 30-some entries is a bad number for a CC, 40 would be beautiful but I’ll take 30’s. It’s a matter of balancing judging stress, green room time, masquerade length, and judging deliberation against letting everyone who wants to compete be able to compete. Too many entries and your whole schedule and system gets clogged. But make the rules too strict and you scare off the wide-eyed novices and give them the impression that we are a bunch of elitists who don’t want them playing in our pool.

CC34 is definitely trying to court the young crowd, we’ve got a lot of newish anime cons in our area and the midwest is packed full of all kinds of genre cons of various sizes. We don’t know what’s going to show up but at the same time I think we want to balance traditional expectations against what the young folks are “used to.” What they’re used to isn’t always good. We’ve walked out on masquerades at some of these tiny WI cons because they’re just awful. Emcees on the stage making fun of the competitors and interfering in their performances, judges who have no sewing or costume-building skills at all but were picked because they’re friends with the director, rules allowing people to sing entire 5-minute-long songs with a hand mike (badly), limits on the number of walk-ons allowed so that they can let skits have 5 minutes or more….you name it. Every con that starts up runs a masquerade that re-invents the wheel without borrowing from other more successful masquerades, so we’ve seen hilarious and wrong taken to all new levels. So, there’s a lot we’re just NOT going to encourage, no matter how much the youngsters complain that it’s “not what they’re used to.” Tough, you’re not getting a five minute skit to sing Broadway tunes.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <ecmami@…> wrote :

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2758 From: Vicky Young Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

Interestingly enough, in addition to the masquerades that we’ve walked out on here in WI, I’ve also seen the opposite happening at many of our local cons, where the competition is getting stiffer, and the entrants who are not completely new to the masquerade scene are waiting to put the their costumes on until they are in the green room. This phenomenon really seems to be convention-specific, as Dawn has already pointed out. I know that when I have gone to bigger anime cons, like Acen, I preferred to wear my impressive costumes in the hallways, because they just got so much more exposure. I also got many more pictures taken, and I admit to a certain satisfaction when I see pictures of my costume pop up on costuming forums and websites. 🙂
Vicky Assarattanakul

 

On Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:42 PM, “staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Elaine, Kevin….BRILLIANT. I will consider making the changes and running past the concomm at our next meeting. Muahahaha.

Dawn does have a point – at much larger cons, there are different habits and cultures cultivated by the sheer size and the number of opportunities for presenting a costume. Dragon*Con has ALWAYS been about showing your most spectacular costumes in the hall, not the masquerade, because the masquerade (at least in the early 2000s) had an awful reputation for not being about the quality of construction at all. Plus, every single fandom track has its own costume contest, held at random points during the day and not involving performance at all. To compete in the Star Wars costume contest you just showed up at the 2pm time slot and let the celebrities ogle you from their chairs. It’s always been “the thing to do” to spend all year building your most amazing costume and then just hang around in the Hyatt lobby to let the photographer circles cluster around you. I don’t know if that’s changed much in the last 10 years, but there you go.

I am fascinated by Byron’s history information, mainly because it might be a case of history repeating itself. Masquerades at mid-sized cons are getting swelled to bursting again, maybe it IS time to re-instill the actual rule to cut down on the number of entries. I don’t think 30-some entries is a bad number for a CC, 40 would be beautiful but I’ll take 30’s. It’s a matter of balancing judging stress, green room time, masquerade length, and judging deliberation against letting everyone who wants to compete be able to compete. Too many entries and your whole schedule and system gets clogged. But make the rules too strict and you scare off the wide-eyed novices and give them the impression that we are a bunch of elitists who don’t want them playing in our pool.

CC34 is definitely trying to court the young crowd, we’ve got a lot of newish anime cons in our area and the midwest is packed full of all kinds of genre cons of various sizes. We don’t know what’s going to show up but at the same time I think we want to balance traditional expectations against what the young folks are “used to.” What they’re used to isn’t always good. We’ve walked out on masquerades at some of these tiny WI cons because they’re just awful. Emcees on the stage making fun of the competitors and interfering in their performances, judges who have no sewing or costume-building skills at all but were picked because they’re friends with the director, rules allowing people to sing entire 5-minute-long songs with a hand mike (badly), limits on the number of walk-ons allowed so that they can let skits have 5 minutes or more….you name it. Every con that starts up runs a masquerade that re-invents the wheel without borrowing from other more successful masquerades, so we’ve seen hilarious and wrong taken to all new levels. So, there’s a lot we’re just NOT going to encourage, no matter how much the youngsters complain that it’s “not what they’re used to.” Tough, you’re not getting a five minute skit to sing Broadway tunes.

Stace


—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <ecmami@…> wrote :


However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.
 
Elaine Mami

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2759 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

In less a “historian” and more “just a guy who remembers shit.”

Forty and Myrtle wore their “futuricostumes” at the first Worldcon, and the reports I read said it was just them.

At the second Worldcon, more people wore costumes, and there was a costume contest at the dance.

I believe “masquerade” was chosen because it originally was a costume-friendly dance/ball with a contest, but I’ve got no concrete evidence that’s definitely the case.

I do not know when things changed from a simple contest at the dance. There’s plenty of evidence that, through most of the 50’s, masquerades were still a simple affair, and the pros participated. There’s also evidence by the late 60’s of large, complicated stage costumes. John and Bjo Trimble world be the people to ask, they were there, in the middle of it. June Moffatt would also be a primary source.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2760 From: Pierre and Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/18/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume s

 

Well, I think Byron has said it better than I ever could. I would
prefer  not to see the competition costumes in the halls before the
competition, but it should be up to the individual MD.  In our
experience, we see more of the “hall costumes in competition”
at smaller cons/masquerades, in order to encourage more people to enter.
At some cons, if we didn’t recruit hall costumes, we wouldn’t have had a
show.

Stace also made a good point about the size of competition costumes. If
the costume can’t get thru doorways without major contortions, if you
knock over 3 people every time you turn around, or if you need an
entourage just to move, it’s not really suitable for the halls. That
doesn’t mean competition costumes can’t be hall costumes. If we have
large competition costumes, we try our best to design them so they can be
easily modified for hall wear (different headpiece, removable train,
removing wings, etc.) We’ve also occasionally turned hall costumes into
competition costumes, by doing the reverse.

While we would not wear our competition costumes in the halls beforehand,
ultimately the rule should be up to the Masquerade Director, who
hopefully will decide based on what will provide the best show to the
audience.

Sandy

At 09:09 PM 4/17/2015, Byron wrote:

 

I’d like to use a few electrons
to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the
historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no
competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939,
Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first
World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my
knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear
them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman
character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which
they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties,
not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for
persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their
costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the
time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries
frequently exceed 100 in number and the Masquerade could run for
hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule
that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be
entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of
masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first
version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that
such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by
ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It
worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very
similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a
dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is
a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid
years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote
on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo
awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We
give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters,
much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they
hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of
Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the
masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of
hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at
CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe,
was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped
that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer
needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional
sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009,
for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in
2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a
similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had
43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF
masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the
year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to
the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is
lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for
memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent
up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in
the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot
of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison
Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be
true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in
Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the
masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.
If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to
have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes
and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the
number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.
You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of
some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage
fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 yyears
old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether
that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance
judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced
by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t
remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m
also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the
audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are
missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their
views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’
casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
<runacc@yahoogroups.com
> wrote:

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂
New subject:
More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of
costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions
that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their
“wow” costumes in the halls for maximum
effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly
more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather
than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty
much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great
having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try
to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks
“.
I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of
getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an
accommodation?   I remember one person on
Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least
USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said
“I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as
much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much
everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in
some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But,
stay with me here.
Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on
stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some
point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less
“fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges
because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the
surprise factor.
I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I
wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?
Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage
fading?
Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear
their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?
In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a
“preview”.
Discuss!

International Costumers’ Guild Archivist


http://www.costume.org/gallery2/main.php

“Those Who Fail to Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly –
Why They Are Simply Doomed.”

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C. Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2761 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

 

Very good points. You are the MD. You make the rules. As long as people know way ahead of time, they can’t really complain. And they need to know that we may do things a little differently at CC.

 

CC32 had the FAQ I had written up, which gently encourage people to “save it for the stage”, but when questioned on Cosplay.com (re: “I worked hard on this, etc.), a response was not to discourage anyone. I may have disagreed with that policy, but that was the prerogative of the staff to do so.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 11:40 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Excellent topic.

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on.

 

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2762 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Kevin and

 

 

I think both Kevin’s suggestion and this one are pretty good.   Not direct “you can’t wear it”, but makes the point.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 1:03 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Betsy, I agree wholeheartedly!  And I agree that you must continue to repeat yourself on their websites.

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami
who is urging everyone to vote for CC36 in San Diego!

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2763 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

 

’50s is what we understand, and from some supporting fan docs on line I’ve found.

 

 

Bruce

 

Archivist

International Costumers Guild

International Costumers Gallery: http://www.costume.org/gallery2/main.php

ICG YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ICGArchives/feed

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-International-Costumers-Gallery/237722405911

 

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:55 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

I do not know when things changed from a simple contest at the dance. There’s plenty of evidence that, through most of the 50’s, masquerades were still a simple affair, and the pros participated. There’s also evidence by the late 60’s of large, complicated stage costumes. John and Bjo Trimble world be the people to ask, they were there, in the middle of it. June Moffatt would also be a primary source.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2764 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups

 

 

Not sure how you’d do that.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:22 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list – bid groups

Maybe our culture needs to take steps to encompass theirs?

Byron

 

On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:35 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

True enough, but to really get the manpower, you’re frequently drawing from whole chapters.   Of course, that’s not been the trend more recently.   Yet, other groups need to make sure they make an effort to become part of and understand our community/culture.  Otherwise, we run into the problem of concoms who think running a CC is interchangeable with any other con they’ve staffed.   No – no, it’s not.

 

You might recall we had a bid from Eau Claire a few years back.   (Practically) no one knew who they were and they did not win the bid, not surprisingly.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2765 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Aurora

 

 

There were reasons for the line by the GR, which I believe I mentioned in the review some time back. I’m not referring to those people. I’m talking about costumes I saw on Friday, and Saturday morning then showing up on stage. They weren’t on their way anywhere. They were just hanging out in the halls, going through the dealers room, going to panels.

 

Re: the judges, you’re talking about an ideal situation. Often times, the judges have to be substituted due to prior commitments, etc. It can be a real mixed bag. I’m also thinking about this from an entertainment standpoint. If we want to promote the masquerade(s) as being a cut above the rest, there needs to be something special about them, not just “more of the same”. If this trend continues (I first noticed it at CC27), then that’s what we’re going to get. In which case, that calls into question whether there’s a point to a formal competition. That’s sort of another side discussion we could go into, but we could get too easily sidetracked.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:46 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Although I understand the sentiment behind the rule, I just can’t get behind it because I see too much area for confusion.  For example, at CC 32 there was quite a line for the Green Room and lots of people came early and stood in the hall.  It was, in my opinion, early enough that a judge may not have realized in the elevator that it was time.  There’s also the question of people wanting to wear their costume to rehearsal and getting there.  I know most of us carry or wear part of the costume, but there are some costumes and/or presentations where it may be important, but judges may not realize in the elevator at 11:00 am that they should look the other way.  Imo it’s better to get judges who can work to put that aside and judge the workmanship based on the information given and the presentation based on what was onstage.  Nigh-impossible, I agree, but we already trust our judges with not remembering other Masquerades where they saw a similar costume or not judging a costumer’s past work when considering this current contest, and I feel this is no different.

~Aurora

On Friday, April 17, 2015, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2766 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

 

I do not think so.

 

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

 

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot. 

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

 

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

 

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

 

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

 

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

 

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

 

Byron the Boring

        

          

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2767 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes- Stace again

 

 

You’re the MD. And the CC34 concom make the policies. Every con is different. It’s up to y’all to educate your membership by making those policies clear that say “This is the way we do things at this convention”. You don’t want to base policies on pleasing a minority.

Most people will recognize that this is a different playground with different rules. The ones who object are the ones used to getting their way. “That’s not how they do it at Con X”. That is correct.

 

I do see a certain amount of history being repeated, but as Sandy pointed out, back then, people were being recruited to go on stage, to some extent. Unless the concom just totally fails doing their job promoting, that’s not an issue with CC.

 

With Geek.Kon, you guys have already been laying down the framework for what attendees can expect.

 

I’ll betcha if you use both Kevin and Elaine’s suggestions, this will minimize the issue. Chatting the topic up in promotions might help, too.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:42 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Elaine, Kevin….BRILLIANT. I will consider making the changes and running past the concomm at our next meeting. Muahahaha.

Dawn does have a point – at much larger cons, there are different habits and cultures cultivated by the sheer size and the number of opportunities for presenting a costume. Dragon*Con has ALWAYS been about showing your most spectacular costumes in the hall, not the masquerade, because the masquerade (at least in the early 2000s) had an awful reputation for not being about the quality of construction at all. Plus, every single fandom track has its own costume contest, held at random points during the day and not involving performance at all. To compete in the Star Wars costume contest you just showed up at the 2pm time slot and let the celebrities ogle you from their chairs. It’s always been “the thing to do” to spend all year building your most amazing costume and then just hang around in the Hyatt lobby to let the photographer circles cluster around you. I don’t know if that’s changed much in the last 10 years, but there you go.

I am fascinated by Byron’s history information, mainly because it might be a case of history repeating itself. Masquerades at mid-sized cons are getting swelled to bursting again, maybe it IS time to re-instill the actual rule to cut down on the number of entries. I don’t think 30-some entries is a bad number for a CC, 40 would be beautiful but I’ll take 30’s. It’s a matter of balancing judging stress, green room time, masquerade length, and judging deliberation against letting everyone who wants to compete be able to compete. Too many entries and your whole schedule and system gets clogged. But make the rules too strict and you scare off the wide-eyed novices and give them the impression that we are a bunch of elitists who don’t want them playing in our pool.

CC34 is definitely trying to court the young crowd, we’ve got a lot of newish anime cons in our area and the midwest is packed full of all kinds of genre cons of various sizes. We don’t know what’s going to show up but at the same time I think we want to balance traditional expectations against what the young folks are “used to.” What they’re used to isn’t always good. We’ve walked out on masquerades at some of these tiny WI cons because they’re just awful. Emcees on the stage making fun of the competitors and interfering in their performances, judges who have no sewing or costume-building skills at all but were picked because they’re friends with the director, rules allowing people to sing entire 5-minute-long songs with a hand mike (badly), limits on the number of walk-ons allowed so that they can let skits have 5 minutes or more….you name it. Every con that starts up runs a masquerade that re-invents the wheel without borrowing from other more successful masquerades, so we’ve seen hilarious and wrong taken to all new levels. So, there’s a lot we’re just NOT going to encourage, no matter how much the youngsters complain that it’s “not what they’re used to.” Tough, you’re not getting a five minute skit to sing Broadway tunes.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <ecmami@…> wrote :

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2768 From: ECM Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

Bruce, that is definitely a panel topic!  Right up there with “how to present your costume” and “first CC info” panels.

Elaine


 

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

I do not think so.

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot.

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2769 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2770 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal.

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,

we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,
and encourage that.

Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

I do not think so.

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot.

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2771 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

We say this over and over.

For CC32 we said it in every panel when we were talking about the masquerades and what it’s like.
That said, we  encouraged it but we weren’t dragons about it either, we had to strike a balance

between being strictly traditional and encouraging people to come and try Costume-Con.

Many people think our numbers were big merely because Anime North is big but I’ll tell you nothing is further from the truth. Maral and I had to one on one convince people to try Costume-Con. With so many better known conventions in the Montreal/Toronto corridor to choose from, people were reticent to gamble their money on this con. We worked hard to educate people but also to not scare them away.

I also left it to the Masquerade Directors to decide on and enforce the rules as they wished.

I think we’re lucky to have gotten so many new faces in the door, and they have transmitted their enthusiasm to other friends who didn’t attend, (which was part of the goal for the long term game plan of CC survival). We can work on cultural differences between con styles in consecutive years. I think it will be an easy transition for the most part. 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:46:50 -0700
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

 

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2772 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace (& A

 

 

Agreed! Spot on.

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 11:47 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2773 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

One can hope.   I think it will be an easier task here in the States to nudge folks – up there, you guys have all those other cons, so that would be the accepted “norm”.     If there’s one thing CC32 did, it’s having made a good first impression.   What will be interesting to see if what happens in Madison.  That will be the first test when maybe some of the Canadians might make the trip down.   There will definitely be a “something’s different” undercurrent – hopefully, they’ll be able to make the adaptation as long as policies are made clear.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:31 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

We say this over and over.

For CC32 we said it in every panel when we were talking about the masquerades and what it’s like.
That said, we  encouraged it but we weren’t dragons about it either, we had to strike a balance

between being strictly traditional and encouraging people to come and try Costume-Con.

Many people think our numbers were big merely because Anime North is big but I’ll tell you nothing is further from the truth. Maral and I had to one on one convince people to try Costume-Con. With so many better known conventions in the Montreal/Toronto corridor to choose from, people were reticent to gamble their money on this con. We worked hard to educate people but also to not scare them away.


I also left it to the Masquerade Directors to decide on and enforce the rules as they wished.

I think we’re lucky to have gotten so many new faces in the door, and they have transmitted their enthusiasm to other friends who didn’t attend, (which was part of the goal for the long term game plan of CC survival). We can work on cultural differences between con styles in consecutive years. I think it will be an easy transition for the most part. 🙂


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:46:50 -0700
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2774 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/19/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I think this is a false worry and not a Canadian specific thing. It’s a megacon mentality which as somebody
else pointed out encompasses things like Dragon*Con, Comicons, etc.
 

After all Maral and I, and Jacqui, and Penny, Barb, both Erics ,Cathy Leeson, Trixy, etc

and many other Canadians have always done it “the expected way”.
 
As for any others attending, we Canadians are an adaptable bunch. Emoji

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:49:43 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

One can hope.   I think it will be an easier task here in the States to nudge folks – up there, you guys have all those other cons, so that would be the accepted “norm”.     If there’s one thing CC32 did, it’s having made a good first impression.   What will be interesting to see if what happens in Madison.  That will be the first test when maybe some of the Canadians might make the trip down.   There will definitely be a “something’s different” undercurrent – hopefully, they’ll be able to make the adaptation as long as policies are made clear.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:31 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

We say this over and over.

For CC32 we said it in every panel when we were talking about the masquerades and what it’s like.
That said, we  encouraged it but we weren’t dragons about it either, we had to strike a balance

between being strictly traditional and encouraging people to come and try Costume-Con.

Many people think our numbers were big merely because Anime North is big but I’ll tell you nothing is further from the truth. Maral and I had to one on one convince people to try Costume-Con. With so many better known conventions in the Montreal/Toronto corridor to choose from, people were reticent to gamble their money on this con. We worked hard to educate people but also to not scare them away.

I also left it to the Masquerade Directors to decide on and enforce the rules as they wished.

I think we’re lucky to have gotten so many new faces in the door, and they have transmitted their enthusiasm to other friends who didn’t attend, (which was part of the goal for the long term game plan of CC survival). We can work on cultural differences between con styles in consecutive years. I think it will be an easy transition for the most part. 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:46:50 -0700
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2775 From: spiritof_76 Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
I spent the weekend at our local long run media convention. I knew this
topic was on the boards so I made some mental notes. I witnessed a
young woman in a white Katniss Everdeen dress wear it all day on Friday.
She wore it in the Capital Couture Fashion Show on Friday night. She
wore it all day on Saturday. Then, wore it in the costume contest on
Saturday night. I did not see her on Sunday. From the description of
the costume in the costume contest, it was not a spectacular feat of
costuming prowess with hundreds of hours of work to warrant showing it
off all weekend. It was a second hand dress with some “christmas
crafts” glued to it.

I have not attended the costume contest at this convention for several
years because a) I don’t want to stand in line for an hour to get a seat
to see things from the waist up, b) I’d rather not stand at the back of
the room for an hour and a half, although standing does provide a better
view than sitting and c) the majority of costumes in the costume contest
are worn in the halls before the contest, often all weekend. Costume
contestants can have pre-recorded music, but very few have it. Of the
few who have music even fewer make good use of it. There is no point to
sitting in a crowded room to watch a costume contest when you’ve seen
most of the costumes better in the halls, even at a distance, and they
do little more than parade around on stage.

Michael

 

Group: runacc Message: 2776 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Stace

 

I agree.

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I think in the Stage vs. Hall question we need to explain a very important thing:

Masquerade is a balance. It has to be a fair competition for the entrants. It also has to be a good show for the audience.

Saving your work for the audience makes for a better show, and increases the impact on the judges.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2777 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,
we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,
and encourage that.


Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.



Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada




To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes




“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

 

I do not think so.

 

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

 

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot. 

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

  

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

 

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

 

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

 

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

 

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

 

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

 

Byron the Boring

        
          

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 
 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 
 
 

Discuss!

 
 
 
 




 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2778 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

Thanks for the history on that Byron. 🙂

I had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in 2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things are guidelines rather than rules,

some groups do things one way, others another, others again something in the middle.
When their are no absolutes it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion for making

unintentional faux pas.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

Byron

 

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,

we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,
and encourage that.

Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

I do not think so.

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot.

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 
 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 
 
 

Discuss!

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2779 From: ECM Date: 4/20/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

We all kept the costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a competitor! any clues as to what to expect.  It was actually kind of fun!  “I’ve got a secret!”
Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

Thanks for the history on that Byron. 🙂

I had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in 2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things are guidelines rather than rules,

some groups do things one way, others another, others again something in the middle.
When their are no absolutes it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion for making

unintentional faux pas.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

Byron

 

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,

we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,
and encourage that.

Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

I do not think so.

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot.

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

Byron the Boring

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 
 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 
 
 

Discuss!

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2780 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/21/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

On more than one occasion, entrants have turned up at the green room wrapped in sheets to keep their costumes secret.

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:53 PM, ECM ecmami@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

We all kept the costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a competitor! any clues as to what to expect.  It was actually kind of fun!  “I’ve got a secret!”
Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

Thanks for the history on that Byron. 🙂

I had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in 2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things are guidelines rather than rules,

some groups do things one way, others another, others again something in the middle.
When their are no absolutes it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion for making

unintentional faux pas.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada




To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

Byron

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,
we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,
and encourage that.


Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.



Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada




To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes




“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

 

I do not think so.

 

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

 

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot. 

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

  

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

 

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

 

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

 

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

 

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

 

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

 

Byron the Boring

        
          

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 
 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 
 
 

Discuss!

 
 
 
 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2781 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/21/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

On more than one occasion, entrants have turned up at the green room wrapped in sheets to keep their costumes secret.

The practical thing, though, is nobody cares about a few people seeing you move from your hotel room to the green room in your competiton costume. The judges are probably somewhere else, as is most of the audience.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2782 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai

 

 

As I recall, things were much more competitive then, from what the Pettingers told us.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:53 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

We all kept the costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a competitor! any clues as to what to expect.  It was actually kind of fun!  “I’ve got a secret!”
Elaine

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

Thanks for the history on that Byron. 🙂

I had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in 2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things are guidelines rather than rules,

some groups do things one way, others another, others again something in the middle.
When their are no absolutes it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion for making

unintentional faux pas.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

 

Byron

 

 

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 


We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,

we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,

and encourage that.


Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

 

I do not think so.

 

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

 

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot. 

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

 

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

 

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

 

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

 

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

 

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

 

Byron the Boring

        

          

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2783 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

 

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

 

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered.   I remember at CC32  some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos.  We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs.   Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized.   All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

 

And here’s one more we thought of this morning:  In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”.  

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2784 From: ECM Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai

 

And we had three distinct camps – no, four.  The West, the East, Canada, & Everybody Else!

Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:18:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elaine

 

As I recall, things were much more competitive then, from what the Pettingers told us.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:53 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

We all kept the costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a competitor! any clues as to what to expect.  It was actually kind of fun!  “I’ve got a secret!”
Elaine

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

Thanks for the history on that Byron. 🙂

I had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in 2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things are guidelines rather than rules,

some groups do things one way, others another, others again something in the middle.
When their are no absolutes it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion for making

unintentional faux pas.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I just checked the Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes from competing.

Byron

 

On Apr 19, 2015, at 1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


We have here in the past, especially leading up to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. 

(I was annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been under the impression that it was simply not done at that convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I already mentioned,
HOWEVER,

we can most certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is that your Masquerade costume is a surprise,

and encourage that.


Make it something special, like when you dress up for church.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

 

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration, because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long, and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote it.

 

I’m wondering if we need to do some education about the differences between “hall costumes” and “competition costumes”?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”

 

I do not think so.

 

I think, in part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it two fold.

 

1) And most notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5 thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or fourty or in extreme cases a hundred

masquerade entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite frankly  it’s a crap shoot. 

 

2) Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure you’d have a nice picture of your really impressive

costume was to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography, can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan photographer elsewhere in the convention without participating in the masquerade.

 

I think therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the “impressive things” in the halls.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.

 

The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.

 

Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).

 

Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.

 

At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.

 

So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.

 

“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.

 

Byron the Boring

        

          

On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2785 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai

Yeah, cause the Midwest is so vast and confusing to people on the coasts.

Nora
——————————————–

On Fri, 4/24/15, ECM ecmami@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elaine

And we had three distinct camps – no, four.
The West, the East, Canada, & Everybody Else!

Elaine

To:
runacc@yahoogroups.com
From:
runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr
2015 07:18:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc]
Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn,
Elaine

As I recall, things were much more
competitive then, from what the Pettingers told
us.
Bruce From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:53 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes –
Dawn

We all kept the
costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about
them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a
competitor! any clues as to what to expect. It was
actually kind of fun! “I’ve got a
secret!”
Elaine
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

Thanks for the
history on that Byron. 🙂

I
had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great
lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in
2003 I was under the impression that it was at all
Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things
are guidelines rather than rules,some groups do
things one way, others another, others again something in
the middle.
When their are no absolutes
it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion
for makingunintentional faux
pas.

Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of
Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I just checked the
Torcon 3 masquerade rules. They did not bar hall costumes
from competing. Byron On Apr 19, 2015, at
1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com
[runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
We have here in the past, especially leading up
to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. (I was
annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people
wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all
day before the Masquerade was told by others, “Not to
worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been
under the impression that it was simply not done at that
convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire
culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I
already mentioned,
HOWEVER,we can most
certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the EXPECTATION is
that your Masquerade costume is a
surprise,and
encourage that.
Make it something special, like when you dress
up for church.

Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but
this (CC) is not a huge con, normally. CC32 was an
aberration. Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration,
because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long,
and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote
it. I’m wondering if we need to do some education
about the differences between “hall costumes” and
“competition costumes”? Bruce From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday,
April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE:
[runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition
costumes

“Are
the days of saving one’s competition costume for the
stage fading?” I do not
think so. I think, in
part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it
two fold. 1) And most
notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5
thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand
attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or
fourty or in extreme cases a hundredmasquerade
entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in
the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we
have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship
competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your
impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite
frankly it’s a crap
shoot. 2)
Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure
you’d have a nice picture of your really
impressivecostume was
to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official
photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography,
can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan
photographer elsewhere in the convention without
participating in the
masquerade. I think
therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the
“impressive things” in the
halls.
Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes

I’d like
to use a few electrons to look at how we got here. Kevin
and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however,
and I hope they’ll chime in. In the
beginning there were hall costumes. There were no
competition costumes because there were no competitions.
In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo
made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention
(NYCon 1). To the best of my knowledge, no one else did
so. Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E.
“Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman
character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize
events at which they could show them off. These were very
much masquerade parties, not stage shows. As time went on,
opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up
to a microphone and talk about their
costume. The
popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great
that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a
stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the
“Masquerade” could run for hours. To reduce the size
of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen
in the hall before the masquerade could be entered. This
actually was very effective in cutting the number of
masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).
The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines
included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be
included. That version was adopted by ballots counted at
the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10). It
worked. Costume-Con
is a child of SF conventions. Its structure is very
similar. Like SF cons, we have programming, social events,
a dealers’ room, and competitions. The costume exhibit
essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.
Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the
right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the
bid(s). While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo
awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that
niche. We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs,
especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate
in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF
conventions). We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on
occasion (e.g., CC 33). Since the
time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade”
guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall
costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so
much at CCs. Masquerades also had gotten smaller. That,
I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG
Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were
adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed. It had become
common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and
even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25. In 2009, for
example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30
entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.
Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller
masquerades. The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.
The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade
had 31. At CC 32,
the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number
the year before. This was not just because of cosplayers
attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even
the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.
CC 32 also set a new record for memberships. At this
point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming
energy there is for CC 33. Ther has never been a CC in the
South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may
get a lot of members and entries. The same may be true for
34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been
mid-western CCs. It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga,
only three years after 32 in
Toronto. So, should
you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?
If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law. If you
believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely
to have a very large number of members both desiring to show
hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to
do so in order to reduce the number of entries. It worked
in the past; it may do so again. You have other options,
however, such as restricting the availability of some
awards. “Are
the days of saving one’s competition costume for the
stage fading?” Those days are relatively recent — only
about 20 years old. They don’t represent the long-term
trend. Whether that’s good or bad is up to you. As one
experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned
about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the
costume in the halls. I generally don’t remember that
I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also
looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to
the audience with the intended soundtrack. Those factors
all are missing in the halls. We may want to ask other
judges for their views on this
point. Byron the
Boring

On Apr 16,
2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
<runacc@yahoogroups.com>
wrote: This
oughtta stir some debate: 🙂 New
subject: More of our
CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers
coming from the cosplay community. At conventions that
cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about
wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for
maximum effect. Often, the costume contests are
seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to
cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.
This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.
Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new
people. And I applauded efforts to try to impress our
“con culture upon all those new folks
“. I recognize
that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of
getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of
an accommodation? I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a
forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should
be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on
my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I
can”. So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.
They were not the only ones. Now, in some ways, I
can’t blame them for thinking that way. But, stay
with me here. Any
“wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on
stage. Chances are, the judges will have seen them at
some point, beforehand. This makes the costume less
“fresh”. It’s also not as much fun for the
judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun
for them is the surprise factor. I suspect
this year’s CC will feel more “old school”,
but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at
35? Are the
days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage
fading? Should
there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear
their competition costume in the halls before the
masquerade?In my
opinion, you have a better masquerade without a
“preview”. Discuss!

Group: runacc Message: 2786 From: ECM Date: 4/24/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elai

 

Well, yeah.  You want I should say “the Middles?”
E


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:10:40 -0700
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elaine

 

Yeah, cause the Midwest is so vast and confusing to people on the coasts.

Nora
——————————————–

On Fri, 4/24/15, ECM ecmami@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn, Elaine

And we had three distinct camps – no, four.
The West, the East, Canada, & Everybody Else!

Elaine

To:
runacc@yahoogroups.com
From:
runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr
2015 07:18:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc]
Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn,
Elaine

As I recall, things were much more
competitive then, from what the Pettingers told
us.
Bruce From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:53 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes –
Dawn

We all kept the
costumes secret, and went so far as to not even talk about
them, lest we give a potential judge – or, Ghods forbid! – a
competitor! any clues as to what to expect.  It was
actually kind of fun!  “I’ve got a
secret!”
Elaine
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:16:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

Thanks for the
history on that Byron. 🙂

I
had always grown up hearing Jacqui Ward talk about the great
lengths she went to in keeping her costumes seceret, so in
2003 I was  under the impression that it was at all
Worldcons and Costume-Cons.

I guess that’s the minefield when things
are guidelines rather than rules,some groups do
things one way, others another, others again something in
the middle.
When their are no absolutes
it’s easy to get roasted in the fires of public opinion
for makingunintentional faux
pas.

Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of
Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I just checked the
Torcon 3 masquerade rules.  They did not bar hall costumes
from competing. Byron  On Apr 19, 2015, at
1:17 PM, ‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com
[runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
We have here in the past, especially leading up
to Worldcon being in Toronto and again in Montreal. (I was
annoyed that at Torcon when I directly questioned people
wearing their competition costumes around in the halls all
day before the Masquerade  was told by others, “Not to
worry about it/nobody cares.” as I had always been
under the impression that it was simply not done at that
convention. >_>)

You’re not going to change an entire
culture that has big costumes in the halls for reasons I
already mentioned,
HOWEVER,we can most
certainly indicate that at Costume-Con the  EXPECTATION is
that your Masquerade costume is a
surprise,and
encourage that.
Make it something special, like when you dress
up for church.

Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:17:54 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes – Dawn

I can certainly understand the reasoning – but
this (CC) is not a huge con, normally.   CC32 was an
aberration.   Even CC26 was somewhat of an aberration,
because there hadn’t been a West Coast con in so long,
and Kevin and Andy worked their butts off to promote
it. I’m wondering if we need to do some education
about the differences between “hall costumes” and
“competition costumes”? Bruce From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday,
April 18, 2015 11:09 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE:
[runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition
costumes

“Are
the days of saving one’s competition costume for the
stage fading?” I do not
think so. I think, in
part, the focus on being seen as impressive in the halls it
two fold. 1) And most
notably, the big cons like some of the one here have 5
thousand, twenty thousand, even a hundred thousand
attendees. The masquerade may be limited to only twenty or
fourty or in extreme cases a hundredmasquerade
entries. There is always a scrum for the limited slots in
the masquerade, (even at a show such as Anime North where we
have a Masquerade, Skit, and a specific Workmanship
competition), and the likelihood of you GETTING to show your
impressive, stageworthy costume on stage is low. Quite
frankly  it’s a crap
shoot.  2)
Photography. In the old days, the best way of making sure
you’d have a nice picture of your really
impressivecostume was
to enter the masquerade and get a copy of the official
photography photo. Now in the advent of digital photography,
can just as likely get a nice photo with an accomplished fan
photographer elsewhere in the convention without
participating in the
masquerade. I think
therefore some people have become accustomed to wearing the
“impressive things” in the
halls.
Dawn McKechnie
– President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:19:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Hall costumes are
becoming the Competition costumes

I’d like
to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin
and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however,
and I hope they’ll chime in. In the
beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no
competition costumes because there were no competitions.
In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo
made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention
(NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did
so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E.
“Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman
character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize
events at which they could show them off.  These were very
much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on,
opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up
to a microphone and talk about their
costume. The
popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great
that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a
stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the
“Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size
of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen
in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This
actually was very effective in cutting the number of
masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).
The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines
included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be
included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at
the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It
worked. Costume-Con
is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very
similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events,
a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit
essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.
Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the
right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the
bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo
awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that
niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs,
especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate
in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF
conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on
occasion (e.g., CC 33). Since the
time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade”
guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall
costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so
much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That,
I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG
Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were
adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become
common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and
even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for
example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30
entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.
Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller
masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.
The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade
had 31. At CC 32,
the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number
the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers
attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even
the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.
CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this
point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming
energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the
South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may
get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for
34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been
mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga,
only three years after 32 in
Toronto. So, should
you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?
If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you
believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely
to have a very large number of members both desiring to show
hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to
do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked
in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options,
however, such as restricting the availability of some
awards. “Are
the days of saving one’s competition costume for the
stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only
about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term
trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one
experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned
about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the
costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that
I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also
looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to
the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors
all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other
judges for their views on this
point. Byron the
Boring

On Apr 16,
2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
<runacc@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:  This
oughtta stir some debate:   🙂 New
subject:  More of our
CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers
coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that
cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about
wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for
maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are
seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to
cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.
This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.
Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new
people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our
“con culture upon all those new folks
“. I recognize
that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of
getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of
an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a
forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should
be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on
my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I
can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.
They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I
can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay
with me here. Any
“wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on
stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at
some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less
“fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the
judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun
for them is the surprise factor.     I suspect
this year’s CC will feel more “old school”,
but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at
35? Are the
days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage
fading? Should
there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear
their competition costume in the halls before the
masquerade?In my
opinion, you have a better masquerade without a
“preview”.   Discuss!

Group: runacc Message: 2787 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

Re: photography…34 already has a photographer lined up. Realtime, the folks who do greenscreen who you might have seen at Teslacon. We’re going to give them all the promotion they want, so if good photos are all people want out of their costumes, then really, they can hang out in the halls and patronize Realtime all day/all weekend and never set foot on stage.

Damaging or staining a costume has been one of the things I’ve tried when exhorting people not to wear their competition costumes in the hall. Despite being one of the most logical reason, it also seems to be the one that falls on deaf ears the most, and I don’t get it. The other thing I try to explain is that competition is a time-consuming process and can be everything from boring to nerve-wracking, so if you’re not comfortable giving up your entire Saturday to the process (orientation, rehearsals, judging, sitting in the green room for hours), then don’t! But that also doesn’t seem to get through to people. Sure, there are small cons where it’s not quite as time-intensive, when they don’t have rehearsals or green room call is like five minutes before stage time, but at cons where space in the masquerade is a premium, it WILL take your Saturday away. You won’t be able to enjoy the con for more than maybe an hour around lunchtime. Putting yourself through that is worth it when the masquerade itself is worth being in (and hopefully winning a little award at), but otherwise…

Maybe I’m just getting old, too. I don’t get sitting around a green room and judging/rehearsal all day in the same costume I’ve worn for two days straight just to go out and do a little circle on the stage. I don’t get how anyone can find that thrilling.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

 

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered.   I remember at CC32  some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos.  We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs.   Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized.   All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

 

And here’s one more we thought of this morning:  In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”.  

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2788 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

 

Probably wouldn’t’ be a bad idea to have a FAQ, anyway.

Bruce

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

Re: photography…34 already has a photographer lined up. Realtime, the folks who do greenscreen who you might have seen at Teslacon. We’re going to give them all the promotion they want, so if good photos are all people want out of their costumes, then really, they can hang out in the halls and patronize Realtime all day/all weekend and never set foot on stage.

Damaging or staining a costume has been one of the things I’ve tried when exhorting people not to wear their competition costumes in the hall. Despite being one of the most logical reason, it also seems to be the one that falls on deaf ears the most, and I don’t get it. The other thing I try to explain is that competition is a time-consuming process and can be everything from boring to nerve-wracking, so if you’re not comfortable giving up your entire Saturday to the process (orientation, rehearsals, judging, sitting in the green room for hours), then don’t! But that also doesn’t seem to get through to people. Sure, there are small cons where it’s not quite as time-intensive, when they don’t have rehearsals or green room call is like five minutes before stage time, but at cons where space in the masquerade is a premium, it WILL take your Saturday away. You won’t be able to enjoy the con for more than maybe an hour around lunchtime. Putting yourself through that is worth it when the masquerade itself is worth being in (and hopefully winning a little award at), but otherwise…

Maybe I’m just getting old, too. I don’t get sitting around a green room and judging/rehearsal all day in the same costume I’ve worn for two days straight just to go out and do a little circle on the stage. I don’t get how anyone can find that thrilling.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered.   I remember at CC32  some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos.  We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs.   Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized.   All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

 

And here’s one more we thought of this morning:  In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”. 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2789 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/25/2015
Subject: Competition FAQ for Costume-Cons

Okay, so Yahoo has the capacity to hold files in archive. I believe the hotel contract draft is already there. What would you put into such a FAQ, for current and future use?

And…GO!

Betsy

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:38 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Probably wouldn’t’ be a bad idea to have a FAQ, anyway.

Bruce

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

Re: photography…34 already has a photographer lined up. Realtime, the folks who do greenscreen who you might have seen at Teslacon. We’re going to give them all the promotion they want, so if good photos are all people want out of their costumes, then really, they can hang out in the halls and patronize Realtime all day/all weekend and never set foot on stage.

Damaging or staining a costume has been one of the things I’ve tried when exhorting people not to wear their competition costumes in the hall. Despite being one of the most logical reason, it also seems to be the one that falls on deaf ears the most, and I don’t get it. The other thing I try to explain is that competition is a time-consuming process and can be everything from boring to nerve-wracking, so if you’re not comfortable giving up your entire Saturday to the process (orientation, rehearsals, judging, sitting in the green room for hours), then don’t! But that also doesn’t seem to get through to people. Sure, there are small cons where it’s not quite as time-intensive, when they don’t have rehearsals or green room call is like five minutes before stage time, but at cons where space in the masquerade is a premium, it WILL take your Saturday away. You won’t be able to enjoy the con for more than maybe an hour around lunchtime. Putting yourself through that is worth it when the masquerade itself is worth being in (and hopefully winning a little award at), but otherwise…

Maybe I’m just getting old, too. I don’t get sitting around a green room and judging/rehearsal all day in the same costume I’ve worn for two days straight just to go out and do a little circle on the stage. I don’t get how anyone can find that thrilling.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered. I remember at CC32 some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos. We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs. Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized. All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

And here’s one more we thought of this morning: In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”.


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2790 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

I like that idea.  We could make it available to concoms to post on their web sites.

Byron
On Apr 25, 2015, at 8:38 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Probably wouldn’t’ be a bad idea to have a FAQ, anyway.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos



Re: photography…34 already has a photographer lined up. Realtime, the folks who do greenscreen who you might have seen at Teslacon. We’re going to give them all the promotion they want, so if good photos are all people want out of their costumes, then really, they can hang out in the halls and patronize Realtime all day/all weekend and never set foot on stage.

Damaging or staining a costume has been one of the things I’ve tried when exhorting people not to wear their competition costumes in the hall. Despite being one of the most logical reason, it also seems to be the one that falls on deaf ears the most, and I don’t get it. The other thing I try to explain is that competition is a time-consuming process and can be everything from boring to nerve-wracking, so if you’re not comfortable giving up your entire Saturday to the process (orientation, rehearsals, judging, sitting in the green room for hours), then don’t! But that also doesn’t seem to get through to people. Sure, there are small cons where it’s not quite as time-intensive, when they don’t have rehearsals or green room call is like five minutes before stage time, but at cons where space in the masquerade is a premium, it WILL take your Saturday away. You won’t be able to enjoy the con for more than maybe an hour around lunchtime. Putting yourself through that is worth it when the masquerade itself is worth being in (and hopefully winning a little award at), but otherwise…

Maybe I’m just getting old, too. I don’t get sitting around a green room and judging/rehearsal all day in the same costume I’ve worn for two days straight just to go out and do a little circle on the stage. I don’t get how anyone can find that thrilling.

Stace



—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

 

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered.   I remember at CC32  some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos.  We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs.   Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized.   All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

 

And here’s one more we thought of this morning:  In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”.   

  




 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2791 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Competition FAQ for Costume-Cons

 

Did you ever track down the document we did after CC16?

Bruce

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 7:43 PM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: [runacc] Competition FAQ for Costume-Cons

Okay, so Yahoo has the capacity to hold files in archive. I believe the hotel contract draft is already there. What would you put into such a FAQ, for current and future use?

And…GO!

Betsy

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:38 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Probably wouldn’t’ be a bad idea to have a FAQ, anyway.

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes – photos

Re: photography…34 already has a photographer lined up. Realtime, the folks who do greenscreen who you might have seen at Teslacon. We’re going to give them all the promotion they want, so if good photos are all people want out of their costumes, then really, they can hang out in the halls and patronize Realtime all day/all weekend and never set foot on stage.

Damaging or staining a costume has been one of the things I’ve tried when exhorting people not to wear their competition costumes in the hall. Despite being one of the most logical reason, it also seems to be the one that falls on deaf ears the most, and I don’t get it. The other thing I try to explain is that competition is a time-consuming process and can be everything from boring to nerve-wracking, so if you’re not comfortable giving up your entire Saturday to the process (orientation, rehearsals, judging, sitting in the green room for hours), then don’t! But that also doesn’t seem to get through to people. Sure, there are small cons where it’s not quite as time-intensive, when they don’t have rehearsals or green room call is like five minutes before stage time, but at cons where space in the masquerade is a premium, it WILL take your Saturday away. You won’t be able to enjoy the con for more than maybe an hour around lunchtime. Putting yourself through that is worth it when the masquerade itself is worth being in (and hopefully winning a little award at), but otherwise…

Maybe I’m just getting old, too. I don’t get sitting around a green room and judging/rehearsal all day in the same costume I’ve worn for two days straight just to go out and do a little circle on the stage. I don’t get how anyone can find that thrilling.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

Circling back to this one, here’s a thought for CC34:

The statement below is an interesting thought I’d not considered.   I remember at CC32  some unaffiliated person or persons had a photo area set up in the hall, offering (free?) photos.  We’ve never really emphasized the fact that we have official photography and the fan photo runs.   Perhaps, in addition to Elaine’s and Kevin’s suggestions, the photo ops need to be emphasized.   All three things might help to cut down on seeing stuff in the halls beforehand.

 And here’s one more we thought of this morning:  In a way, one hopes they’ve taken this into account, but, “Do you want to chance wearing your costume in the halls, only for it to fall apart in front of the Workmanship judges, or worse, even on stage?”.  

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2792 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…

So, our “knitting circle” (re: costuming nerds) were talking about this yesterday, and my theory was regarding specifically younger costumer/cosplayers, is that they make several costumes a year, so they’re not in the mindset to wear their stage outfits the following year in the halls like many in our community do Nora disagreed, saying it’s more like 1 or 2.

 So for those of you who are closer to the ground like the MACS and Dawn, etc, what are your observations? Am I wrong? I’ve had the impression, from FB and forums, because there are so many anime/media conventions, that they are producing at least 3 costumes a year. Maybe they’re not competition-level? I intend to throw this question out on the D list, FB and Cosplay.com, to get a better feel of it for future discussion.

 Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2793 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

many of the ‘celeb’ cosplayers sure make 12 a year, but they are not all what the old guard would consider stage worthy.
Boo from Monsters inc, is a t shirt wig and bike shorts,

not that some of the things they produce aren’t amazing, just the numbers get inflated by simpler ‘cosplay’ costuming

and I am sure that everyday normal cosplayers do this as well. 1-2 killer pieces, then a bunch of fun stuff.

there’s even a movement to be disney characters from the thrift with no sewing involved at all. just het the colors right.

none of this takes away from the times they throw down and do wonderful work that would win on stage in any era

but they dont make 12 of those a year.

and this is not new at all

I recall an old costume apa article by karen turner ( may have been schnaubelt then ) saying she did 12-15 a year. the ones we all remember from the old VHS tapes, and the rest were 1 weekend pretty star trek dresses. So she always had something new and nice to wear, but they weren’t all “turn of a friendly card”

Ricky

Gravely MacCabre
http://www.castleblood.com
http://facebook.com/gravelymaccabre
http://www.etsy.com/shop/gravelymaccabre

tv show clip samples at
http://www.veoh.com/channels/castleblood

——————————————–

On Mon, 4/27/15, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, April 27, 2015, 8:29 AM

So, our
“knitting circle” (re: costuming nerds) were
talking about this yesterday, and my theory was regarding
specifically younger costumer/cosplayers, is that they make
several costumes a year, so they’re not in the mindset
to wear their stage outfits the following year in the halls
like many in our community do Nora disagreed, saying
it’s more like 1 or 2. So for those of you
who are closer to the ground like the MACS and Dawn, etc,
what are your observations? Am I wrong? I’ve had
the impression, from FB and forums, because there are so
many anime/media conventions, that they are producing at
least 3 costumes a year. Maybe they’re not
competition-level? I intend to throw this question out
on the D list, FB and Cosplay.com, to get a better feel of
it for future discussion. Bruce

Group: runacc Message: 2794 From: spiritof_76 Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

I know cosplayers who may make 3 costumes per convention, then sell them
after they’ve worn them a few times.

Michael

On 2015-04-27 06:29, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
wrote:

> So, our “knitting circle” (re: costuming nerds) were talking about
> this yesterday, and my theory was regarding specifically younger
> costumer/cosplayers, is that they make several costumes a year, so
> they’re not in the mindset to wear their stage outfits the following
> year in the halls like many in our community do Nora disagreed,
> saying it’s more like 1 or 2.
>
> So for those of you who are closer to the ground like the MACS and
> Dawn, etc, what are your observations? Am I wrong? I’ve had
> the impression, from FB and forums, because there are so many
> anime/media conventions, that they are producing at least 3 costumes
> a year. Maybe they’re not competition-level? I intend to throw
> this question out on the D list, FB and Cosplay.com, to get a better
> feel of it for future discussion.
>
> Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2795 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

From observation it breaks out into 3 distinct groups in the Anime North Community.

1) The people who work toward and have what they consider a “Stageworthy” costume and have constructed it specifically for the Masquerade. They wear it for the masquerade, and then in the halls later or in subsequent years.

They may or may not have a couple of other “hall costumes”/”easy costumes” /”throw away”/”for fun” costumes etc that they never intend to put on stage, unless it’s for a joke, or as a prop bit.

2) The people who make costumes specifically for the halls, often many of them. They might not be interested in the masquerade at all. Sometimes people will simpler costumes might enter the Skit Contest, (Where the focus is the play, not the costuming, and we allow purchases and commissioned costumes and other things that are not allowed in the masquerade.).

On occasion a group of “hall costumers” who’s costumes comprise a large portion of a cast from a popular show, e.g. Naruto, Bleach, Dragonball Z, etc, will suddenly be inspired to enter the masquerade because a large ensemble group usually looks impressive even if the costumes are relatively simple.

3) Lifestylers & fashionistas. (Steampunk, Gothic & Lolita, J-Street Style, Gangaro, etc). They rarely enter the skit or the masquerade, but often have elaborate clothing/costumes.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:29:26 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

So, our “knitting circle” (re: costuming nerds) were talking about this yesterday, and my theory was regarding specifically younger costumer/cosplayers, is that they make several costumes a year, so they’re not in the mindset to wear their stage outfits the following year in the halls like many in our community do   Nora disagreed, saying it’s more like 1 or 2.

 So for those of you who are closer to the ground like the MACS and Dawn, etc, what are your observations?   Am I wrong?   I’ve had the impression, from FB and forums, because there are so many anime/media conventions, that they are  producing at least 3 costumes a year.   Maybe they’re not competition-level?   I intend to throw this question out on the D list, FB and Cosplay.com, to get a better feel of it for future discussion.

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2796 From: Vicky Young Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 

I believe the phenomenon we have going on here in Wisconsin (and maybe the Midwest in general) is pretty similar to what Dawn is observing at Anime North. There seems to be the same different groups of costumers. Those who gear their costumes more toward competition typically make fewer costumes per year than their “hall-only” peers. 
That being said, I do think there is a trend among the younger (or perhaps, just the newer-to-competition) crowd, to make a new costume for every convention and take it on stage, regardless of whether it’s “competition-worthy” or not. I was guilty of this myself, in my younger days, and I know a few local costumers who go on stage with a new piece at every single con. I’m not sure if this is something that has evolved out of the rising popularity of Masquerades/costume contests in general, or if it’s just a product enthusiasm. It seems to be more of a phase than anything, as they either stop doing that to themselves and focus on one project at a time, or they retire from the competition scene all together. 
Vicky

 

On Monday, April 27, 2015 5:36 PM, “‘Kaijugal .’ kaijugal@hotmail.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

From observation it breaks out into 3 distinct groups in the Anime North Community.

1) The people who work toward and have what they consider a “Stageworthy” costume and have constructed it specifically for the Masquerade. They wear it for the masquerade, and then in the halls later or in subsequent years.

  They may or may not have a couple of other “hall costumes”/”easy costumes” /”throw away”/”for fun” costumes etc that they never intend to put on stage, unless it’s for a joke, or as a prop bit.

2) The people who make costumes specifically for the halls, often many of them. They might not be interested in the masquerade at all. Sometimes people will simpler costumes might enter the Skit Contest, (Where the focus is the play, not the costuming, and we allow purchases and commissioned costumes and other things that are not allowed in the masquerade.).

On occasion a group of “hall costumers” who’s costumes comprise a large portion of a cast from a popular show, e.g. Naruto, Bleach, Dragonball Z, etc, will suddenly be inspired to enter the masquerade because a large ensemble group usually looks impressive even if the costumes are relatively simple.

3) Lifestylers & fashionistas. (Steampunk, Gothic & Lolita, J-Street Style, Gangaro, etc). They rarely enter the skit or the masquerade, but often have elaborate clothing/costumes.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada




To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:29:26 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

 

So, our “knitting circle” (re: costuming nerds) were talking about this yesterday, and my theory was regarding specifically younger costumer/cosplayers, is that they make several costumes a year, so they’re not in the mindset to wear their stage outfits the following year in the halls like many in our community do   Nora disagreed, saying it’s more like 1 or 2.
 
So for those of you who are closer to the ground like the MACS and Dawn, etc, what are your observations?   Am I wrong?   I’ve had the impression, from FB and forums, because there are so many anime/media conventions, that they are  producing at least 3 costumes a year.   Maybe they’re not competition-level?   I intend to throw this question out on the D list, FB and Cosplay.com, to get a better feel of it for future discussion.
 
Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2797 From: markptjan Date: 4/27/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares.
After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.
It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.
Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2798 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <astra2000@…> wrote :

I believe the phenomenon we have going on here in Wisconsin (and maybe the Midwest in general) is pretty similar to what Dawn is observing at Anime North. There seems to be the same different groups of costumers. Those who gear their costumes more toward competition typically make fewer costumes per year than their “hall-only” peers. 
That being said, I do think there is a trend among the younger (or perhaps, just the newer-to-competition) crowd, to make a new costume for every convention and take it on stage, regardless of whether it’s “competition-worthy” or not. I was guilty of this myself, in my younger days, and I know a few local costumers who go on stage with a new piece at every single con. I’m not sure if this is something that has evolved out of the rising popularity of Masquerades/costume contests in general, or if it’s just a product enthusiasm. It seems to be more of a phase than anything, as they either stop doing that to themselves and focus on one project at a time, or they retire from the competition scene all together. 
Vicky

 

Group: runacc Message: 2799 From: herself-the-elf@rogers.com Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

I don’t think we need to bemoan the
death of tradition. We have to face the fact that costuming has
evolved and that the vast majority of costumers today have come into
the hobby through cosplay. The cons they go to are media and anime
cons. That’s the style of con they’re used to, and it’s not wrong
just because it’s new. Some of those cons have masquerades/cosplay
contests that are poorly run. Some are very well-run. It’s not a Canada
phenomenon, it’s a new-generation phenomenon. Across North America
there are hundreds of large media & anime cons with thousands of
costumers attending. As someone who attends both types of con (older
SF model and newer media/anime model) I often feel caught in the
middle and frustrated with both camps.

If we want CC to survive, to stay
relevant, it needs to evolve and adapt in turn to reflect where
costuming is now. I’m not saying it needs to turn into a media or
anime con, because that’s not the kind of con it is. But some change
is inevitable and necessary to connect with where most costumers are
right now, what they’re expecting and what they’re used to. We can
teach them about costuming tradition while also keeping an open mind
and, importantly, being willing to learn ourselves. Costuming has
exploded in popularity and so much has changed. Rejecting any change
only hurts CC and ensures that it’ll dwindle and fade, and I really
don’t want that to happen. I think we can all play together nicely if
everyone keeps an open mind.

Re: the original topic, it’s a valid point that CC isn’t a
50,000 person con where there’s no way for you to see everyone in the
halls, where your chances of getting onstage are slim, so people tend to aim for hall photoshoots. I get that, but I personally don’t think it needs to be a hard (i.e disqualifiable) rule to keep your
costume secret before the masquerade. It hasn’t always been even at CC/Worldcon, and I think that enforcing it will only cause drama. I do think
that it should be heavily encouraged that people save their “Wow”
costumes for the masquerade, with explanations as to why. A lot of
people already do this and with some work and reinforcement I think
we can get the message across without turning off newcomers.

— Maral Agnerian

 

Group: runacc Message: 2800 From: grizzy1955 Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

(Queues song “Tradition” from FIDDLER ON THE ROOF…)

I think we’re all aware that media con and anime con “con culture” is very different from general science fiction con and Costume-Con “con culture.”

At Dragon*Con and anime cons, it’s all about being seen in the halls, hanging out with other cosplayers, and doing photoshoots. Frankly, this is less stressful then competing in a stage competition where you might actually lose. You also get to be in the costume/character you love for a longer period of time if you’re hanging out in the halls. I can see the plus side of this.

I believe the emphasis on hall costuming vs. competition costuming exists because (1) it’s more fun and less stressful, and (2) this is the generation where everyone gets a gold star just for participating, (3) this is the generation that grew up on anime and Japanese culture, where competition is discouraged for the benefit of the overall group, and (4) some percentage of the costumes are not made by wearer (e.g., they cobbled it together from thrift store clothing, or commissioned someone else to make it for them, or bought a commercially-produced costume online.

Costume-Con grew out of the World Science Fiction masquerade and the make-it-yourself movement of the 1960’s and 1970’s, and has always had strong competition-based roots. Yes, there are “standard” competitions that are written into the ConStitution, but we try to offer a variety of competitions, and encourage each concom to try other types of competitions and events, in order to appeal to a wide variety of tastes. Maybe the Historical competition is too scary, but drawing designs on paper is your thing, or making cool clothes for your dolls, or whatever.

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.
I’m not saying we need a level of paranoid secrecy equal to what was going on at Worldcon in the 80’s, but cosplayers do need to be aware that if they wear their costume in the halls all weekend and also decide to compete it, they may not do as well in competition due to “costume fatigue” (i.e., the judges saying, “Oh, we’ve seen that before.”) This is human nature, and cannot be helped unless we completely sequester the judges all weekend until it is time to judge their event (which is not practical).

The fact is that Costume-Con is a general costuming convention with classes and competitions, and is unique as such. It has not significantly altered its base structure as other trends in costuming have come and gone, and should not now to appeal to groups involved in cosplay, steampunk, etc.  (The world doesn’t need another media/cosplay convention; there are already plenty that do that very well.) However, I do think there is room to maintain the existing base structure of Costume-Con while adding events on a con-by-con basis that might appeal more to cosplayers or other groups.

My two cents.

–Karen

 

Group: runacc Message: 2801 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/28/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”

I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2802 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/30/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume

 

 

Getting back to the discussion late:

 

Re (With apologies to the Honey Badger) “cosplayers don’t care”. Reading the discussion and drawing from my own experience, I can certainly understand the mindset of there being less of a sense of “competition-worthy” costumes, but Stace’s comments give me some insight into the perception. So, it’s not so much “onstage competition-worthy” – that energy is less focused on masquerade competition and more about impressing their peers and the public in the halls. There’s apparently still a healthy sense of competition among a certain percentage of costumer/cosplayers, though. Nonetheless, there are “horror stories” of the ones that lie about their workmanship, etc. (Andy has a very notorious example of that).

 

Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t carethis is Costume-Con. Costume-Con has masquerades. The con has its own culture, and should be recognized as unique in its focus. Yes, it should be inclusive, but I think it does a disservice to new people to assume they are not willing to learn about how a different con works.

Re: Awards – Those “horse ribbons” represent more at CC. Sure, the big cons have all sorts of prizes, etc. But at CC, they represent recognition by their peers that they are respected for their efforts. That shouldn’t be underestimated. And for a lot of people, that respect is more important to them because their labors of love are acknowledged. I know – I have seen the excitement and tears when they get called up on stage.

 

An additional thought or two: One thing that sets CC apart is the opportunity to have a tech rehearsal. I fully understand the decisions made by the CC32 tech crew to abbreviate times (or outright deny time to some) for completely valid logistical reasons, due to the number of entries. I just hope that’s not a precedent set. New people are always amazed and thankful for the time to walk the stage with Tech. And frankly, that’s probably only a danger when we’re back in San Diego and Toronto. Hopefully, aware of CC32’s experience, those bigger cons will plan accordingly.

 Ultimately, it’s still the prerogative of each MD, or concom, to set the costume policy. Should CC34 adopt the suggestions made on this list, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on the hall costumes as well as the quality of the masquerade(s). It’s is an opportunity to “make new mistakes!”, as pas CC con staff have frequently exhorted the concoms that follow to do.

 For my part, I’m actually glad to know what the policy for Toronto will be – I think it might give me a slight advantage over many of my fellow competitors. 🙂

 Bruce

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”

I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares.

After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.

It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.

Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.


Posted by: admin@conbravo.com

 

Group: runacc Message: 2803 From: Kaijugal . Date: 5/2/2015
Subject: Re: Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costume
Bruce Mai wrote:


“Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests
 and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.”

 
—–
No Bruce,

At Anime North we have a MASQUERADE  just so, ( with same emphasis to make point).
 
To say we don’t, or don’t care, it just straight up being rude.


Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:43:41 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

 

 

Getting back to the discussion late:

 

Re (With apologies to the Honey Badger) “cosplayers don’t care”.    Reading the discussion and drawing from my own experience, I can certainly understand the mindset of there being less of a  sense of “competition-worthy” costumes, but Stace’s comments give me some insight into the perception.  So, it’s not so much “onstage competition-worthy” – that energy is less focused on masquerade competition and more about impressing their peers and the public in the halls.     There’s apparently still a healthy sense of competition among a certain percentage of costumer/cosplayers, though.   Nonetheless, there are  “horror stories” of the ones that lie about their workmanship, etc.   (Andy has a very notorious example of that).

 

Now, at these large media cons mentioned (Dragon Con, AN, etc.) , their shows are more “costume contests and maybe they don’t care  – this is Costume-Con.   Costume-Con has masquerades.   The con has its own culture, and should be recognized as unique in its focus.   Yes, it should be inclusive, but I think it does a disservice to new people to assume they are not  willing to learn about how a different con works.

    

Re: Awards – Those “horse ribbons” represent more at CC.  Sure, the big cons have all sorts of prizes, etc.   But at CC, they represent recognition by their peers that they are respected for their efforts.   That shouldn’t be underestimated.   And for a lot of people, that respect is more important to them because their labors of love are acknowledged.    I know –  I have seen the excitement and tears when they get called up on stage. 

 

An additional thought or two: One thing that sets CC apart is the opportunity to have a tech rehearsal.   I fully understand the decisions made by the CC32 tech crew to abbreviate times (or outright deny time to some) for completely valid logistical reasons, due to the number of entries.   I just hope that’s not a precedent set.   New people are always amazed and thankful for the time to walk the stage with Tech.  And frankly, that’s probably only a danger when we’re back in San Diego and Toronto.    Hopefully, aware of CC32’s experience, those bigger cons will  plan accordingly.

 

Ultimately, it’s still the prerogative of each MD, or concom, to set the costume policy.    Should CC34 adopt the suggestions made on this list, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on the hall costumes as well as the quality of the masquerade(s).  It’s is an opportunity to “make new mistakes!”, as pas CC con staff have frequently exhorted  the concoms that follow to do.

 

For my part, I’m actually glad to know what the policy for Toronto will be – I think it might give me a slight advantage over many of my fellow competitors.  🙂

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, castleb@atlanticbb.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Masquerade rules have not been standardized over the years, and have been at the discretion of each Masquerade Director. Can anyone give me an example where wearing your competition costume in the halls before the competition was explicitly forbidden? My memory of this (which may be inaccurate) is that it has always been put forth as a strongly worded suggestion. As others have pointed out, the more people that see a costume before a competition, the less the element of surprise and pleasure at seeing it for the first time, which may affect the perception of both the audience and the judges. If the competitor doesn’t care and wants to wear their costume in the halls, that’s their prerogative.

Fashion Show is a separate case, because those costumes are special, and seeing them in the halls (or entered in the F&S/F masquerade the night before) is generally considered a no-no. The Fashion Show costumes entered in the Masquerade issue occurred at the very first convention I attended, and it left a lasting impression of impropriety. Again, if you’ve seen it in the halls or in a previous competition, then there is no incentive to attend the Fashion Show and see the design-to-reality magic on stage. And again, I’m not sure if there has ever been a specific proscription spelled out in the rules for Fashion Show participation.

Competitions have rules. If you want to compete, you have to follow the rules. If a masquerade director or con chair feels strongly enough, maybe this needs to move from a “suggestion” to a “rule.”

I kind of like the “A costume worn in the halls other than to transport it and yourself to the green room is not eligible for Best in Show” is a nice compromise. You can enter, but if you want the biggest big ribbon, you need to keep it under wraps.

 

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:39 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

Pretty much what Vicky said. Now, I haven’t gone to a large anime con in years (AnimeCentral, Anime Detour) but when people are talking about churning out 3-8 costumes a year, they’re talking about hall costumes. They want to have things specifically for series/fandom photoshoots and to fill spots in groups with friends, for the most part. But sometimes these hall costumes do end up on stage, whether on a whim or because the masquerade simply exists.

As to the idea that the big cons “don’t care” if you wear your stage costume in the halls? Not always true. At Dragon*Con there is an entirely different culture of costuming, it really can’t be compared to most cons we regularly attend. It’s a special monster. Some of the big anime cons have all-day pre-judging so you’re FORCED to wear your costume in the halls, even for a little bit, something I personally abhor with every fiber of my being. But competition at these same places can be cutthroat. People will lie about commissions, fight for the coveted spots in the show, sandbag with costumes that’ve already won Best in Show elsewhere, etc.

What’s in it for the cosplayers? Sure, winning is “just” a ribbon and a certificate some places, but some places it’s swag. Some places it’s a large trophy (I have 5 sitting on my mantle across the room). So if it’s “just” a certificate, why the vicious competition? Don’t blame Heroes of Cosplay, it was around before that pile of fake drama. Competition is still a thing, in people’s minds, so to dismiss something as simple as “don’t damage your costume or prejudice the judges” as unnecessary isn’t taking the whole picture into account. We’ve all collectively listed a lot of great reasons not to wear your competition piece all weekend, and “we’ve seen it already, it’s boring” is the LEAST of those reasons.

The reason I advocate a rule or at least a guideline is because in a lot of cases, cultivating a habit or a new (old) way of doing things takes time, patience, and a lot of one-on-one handholding. I would say Geek-kon needed at least 5 years of the costume department and masq. directors diligently sticking to their guns and slogging through a routine before people started to catch on that the masquerade is more fun and interesting when you bring your biggest, shiniest thing and really put some effort into it versus wearing closet-raided Naruto costumes and making out with your gf on stage. Actual example, not making that up. But that routine included requiring rehearsals and checking with people before handing them a hall cosplay award for the same costume they were taking to the masquerade. Having rules in place speeds it up – without rules, that transition would have taken a lot more than 5 years.

I don’t know that we’re ever going to come to a consensus but at least understanding where everyone is coming from is important. Plus, it’s very hard to blanket-statement any of this. Every region has different habits and traditions. What flies at Anime Boston is gauche at Anime Detour, and what’s passe on the coasts is still really popular in the Midwest. To a point, we have to let regional cons do what works in their region. But there are some things that aren’t a bad idea to attempt to universally adopt, and that’s why we argue on this list. 🙂

Stace

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:51 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Survey – (was Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes…)

As someone who’s speaking from almost entirely the Anime/Gaming/Multigenre costuming and convention-running perspective, there’s really no perception of “competition-worthy”. That doesn’t formally exist in such conventions and is looked on as a bit snobbish (YMMV).

I think it’s important to acknowledge that the general public of cosplayers/costumers (however you orient) don’t largely care about arbitrary ideas about whether or not a costume is seen prior to the Masquerade. DragonCon doesn’t care, Anime North doesn’t care, Otakon doesn’t care, Otakuthon doesn’t care, Anime Boston doesn’t care, etc etc. Heck, I’ve yet to see a Comiccon that cares.

After all, what’s actually in it for contestants? By and large, if one were to argue the bare bones, it’s a horse ribbon and bragging rights. Most of these people understand, respect, and enjoy costuming, but won’t be beholden to such rules if the stakes are supposed to be friendly and genial.

It’s similar to how some fannish conventions try to limit the type of costumes which appear. Doctor Who may not be anime, but the majority certainly doesn’t care. At the end of the day, an enterprising cosplayer will simply augment the costume or find some obscure manga/anime reference to Doctor Who to justify things if they have to. Conventions which try to enforce this kind of thing are usually ignored or mocked, and don’t really further an inclusive atmosphere.

Back to the actual topic though: I don’t think we would support any ban on wearing costumes prior to the Masquerade. In my view, at least, it seems like an unnecessary restriction.


Posted by: admin@conbravo.com


 

 

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 55 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 55 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2704 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2705 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2706 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2707 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2708 From: ECM Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2709 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2710 From: Kaijugal . Date: 3/29/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2711 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2712 From: ma0902432 Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2713 From: John O’Halloran Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2714 From: Kevin Roche Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2715 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2716 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2717 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2718 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2719 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2720 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2721 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2722 From: von_drago Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2723 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2724 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2725 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2726 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2727 From: staceylee25 Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2728 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2729 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
Group: runacc Message: 2730 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/1/2015
Subject: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2731 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/2/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2732 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2733 From: costumrs Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2734 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/9/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2735 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/9/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2736 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2737 From: kittythecanuck Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2738 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2739 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – “term limits”
Group: runacc Message: 2740 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
Group: runacc Message: 2741 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2742 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2743 From: Kevin Roche Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2744 From: ECM Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2745 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2746 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2747 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2748 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – “term limits”
Group: runacc Message: 2749 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups
Group: runacc Message: 2750 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2751 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups
Group: runacc Message: 2752 From: ECM Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes
Group: runacc Message: 2753 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2704 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

I agree – FB would not be a good platform, really.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:33 PM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

As an archive, it costs nothing to continue. Unless or until Yahoo decides groups are finished, I don’t see a particular reason to kill the list. Do folks generally agree with me? I doubt that moving to a format like Facebook would be useful, since the ability for folks to see posts depends on whether users have blocked each other. Blocking isn’t an option in a mailing list group, though members can certainly turn posts off.

There are ways to participate that don’t involve the Yahoo interface. I receive messages in my own mailbox and respond to them there. If you use the Yahoo interface exclusively, would you please drop me a line and let me know how that’s working for you? I’m curious.

Thanks,

Betsy

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:10 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2705 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

One value we should consider: This is not an ICG-sponsored activity.  I believe the ICG is working on a set of articles on various aspects of masquerade-running.  On the one hand, they may overlap some of the discussions here; on the other, this list provides an alternative source of information, opinion, and (when sought) advice.  That’s good.

 

Byron

 

 

On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:10 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?



I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club




 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2706 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

I agree and would not want to see the list discontinued.  Like you, I receive messages directly in my in box and respond to them through my e-mail.  I go to the Yahoogroups interface only when I need to look back for something.

 

Byron

 

 

On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:32 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

As an archive, it costs nothing to continue. Unless or until Yahoo decides groups are finished, I don’t see a particular reason to kill the list. Do folks generally agree with me? I doubt that moving to a format like Facebook would be useful, since the ability for folks to see posts depends on whether users have blocked each other. Blocking isn’t an option in a mailing list group, though members can certainly turn posts off.

There are ways to participate that don’t involve the Yahoo interface. I receive messages in my own mailbox and respond to them there. If you use the Yahoo interface exclusively, would you please drop me a line and let me know how that’s working for you? I’m curious.
Thanks,
Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:10 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 



I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club




 





 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2707 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

Well, then folks need to step up and not let the list lay fallow so long, then.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 2:25 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I agree and would not want to see the list discontinued.  Like you, I receive messages directly in my in box and respond to them through my e-mail.  I go to the Yahoogroups interface only when I need to look back for something.

Byron

 

On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:32 PM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

As an archive, it costs nothing to continue. Unless or until Yahoo decides groups are finished, I don’t see a particular reason to kill the list. Do folks generally agree with me? I doubt that moving to a format like Facebook would be useful, since the ability for folks to see posts depends on whether users have blocked each other. Blocking isn’t an option in a mailing list group, though members can certainly turn posts off.

 

There are ways to participate that don’t involve the Yahoo interface. I receive messages in my own mailbox and respond to them there. If you use the Yahoo interface exclusively, would you please drop me a line and let me know how that’s working for you? I’m curious.

 

Thanks,

 

Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:10 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 



 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2708 From: ECM Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

Believe me, San Diego will have it’s entire committee on the list as soon as we win the vote!  Since almost all of them are CC newbies, there will surely be questions.

They will say, “Well, why don’t we do it this way?”  And I will tell them, “That’s a very good question!  Why don’t you post it on the runacc list?”

Elaine
Charter Member of the Slow Learners’ Club


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:24:19 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

 


I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2709 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/25/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

Well, that’s good.   Now, we need to hear more from the Canadians…..

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:37 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

Believe me, San Diego will have it’s entire committee on the list as soon as we win the vote!  Since almost all of them are CC newbies, there will surely be questions.

They will say, “Well, why don’t we do it this way?”  And I will tell them, “That’s a very good question!  Why don’t you post it on the runacc list?”

Elaine
Charter Member of the Slow Learners’ Club

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:24:19 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2710 From: Kaijugal . Date: 3/29/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

I read this list quite extensively before CC32, as well as comments in other ICG and Costume-Con related lists and Social Media circles. I wanted people to have a good time, and I wanted Costume-Con 32 to live up to their expectations as much as possible.

I also was keen to learn all I could being acutely aware of how critical people can be in regards to Costume-Cons in general.

I found some useful information of course we used as much as we could,
(within the scope of the  limited manpower we had to run CC32.)

I do not think the lack of activity, (active discussion?) on the list is an indicator of it being irrelevant.
It is still a list wish some enduringly useful points, even if no further information is currently being added.
I have even made a point of pointing people to this list. If they chose to join and read or not I cannot say.

Removing or closing the list doesn’t make much sense as it is an archive of thoughts and ideas that should

still be useful.
On another note I agree with whomever said it should not be moved to Facebook. Facebook
is new and shiny and nice, but conversations on it archive terribly .
My personal opinion is that it s not a good platform for information you want to store and make available in
an easily searchable format.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:49:50 -0500
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

Well, that’s good.   Now, we need to hear more from the Canadians…..

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:37 PM
To: Betsy D
Subject: RE: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

Believe me, San Diego will have it’s entire committee on the list as soon as we win the vote!  Since almost all of them are CC newbies, there will surely be questions.

They will say, “Well, why don’t we do it this way?”  And I will tell them, “That’s a very good question!  Why don’t you post it on the runacc list?”

Elaine
Charter Member of the Slow Learners’ Club

 


 

To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:24:19 -0400
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2711 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2712 From: ma0902432 Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
I actually think that the ICG Division system of Novice, Journeyman,
Craftsman/Master, has done a pretty good job of suggesting where the
boundarieslie for ascertaining skill level. I Don’t believe that # of
hours spent on building a costume represents skill level or
award-worthiness, as evidenced by comments that when you are first
learning a skill, it takes longer. There is a sweet spot between time
and effort where a costume can exceed any expectations.

And honestly there are some of us, like myself, who just like doing more
time-consuming methods–like hand beadwork. Does that mean that metal
fabricated armor is less worthy somehow? I think not. I’ve been a
Workmanship Judge countless times and it often is comparing apples with
oranges, or more accurately, comparing apples with zebras, when costumers
compete…..

Yours in costuming, Lisa A

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:25:17 -0500 “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’
casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> writes:

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion
going. When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1. What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by
Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,
CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet
the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 2713 From: John O’Halloran Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I’m gonna ignore your Topic #1, as this has been raised on the Sasquan Masq staff list.

Judging forms

I’ve judged 2 worldcons, several westercons and lost count of local cons.

Never once have I received a “special” judges form.    The most “judges form” it’s ever been, is a print out of the entry #, Name, Class and big block for notes.  Sometimes it’s been a copy of the full entry sheet and most often, it’s just a pad of paper that we have to track everything.

Personally, The #, Name, Class, Notes and the judges photos, is all I really use.   I don’t think I would ever have time to read/use a form with a bunch more info or ticky boxes.
JohnO

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

 

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

 

Discuss!

 

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2714 From: Kevin Roche Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I have to admit to a visceral “You have got to be kidding!” reaction to the “numbers of hours –> skill division” approach.

In part because I have seen novice entries that had been worked on FOREVER and still were very definitely appropriate to enter in the novice category.
Also in part because there are certain costuming skills I have where I’m apparently preternaturally fast. You wouldn’t want to argue my work should be entered in the novice category because it only took me 10 hours to put together.
I’m with Lisa, I think the current version of the ICG guidelines wrt skill division is well-considered, especially with the open option to “compete up” that they recommend.
Kevin

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:28 PM, ‘John O’Halloran’ JohnO@TyeDye.Org [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’m gonna ignore your Topic #1, as this has been raised on the Sasquan Masq staff list.

Judging forms

I’ve judged 2 worldcons, several westercons and lost count of local cons.

Never once have I received a “special” judges form.    The most “judges form” it’s ever been, is a print out of the entry #, Name, Class and big block for notes.  Sometimes it’s been a copy of the full entry sheet and most often, it’s just a pad of paper that we have to track everything.

Personally, The #, Name, Class, Notes and the judges photos, is all I really use.   I don’t think I would ever have time to read/use a form with a bunch more info or ticky boxes.
JohnO

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

 

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

 

Discuss!

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2715 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

Marty used specific judging forms, but I don’t know that the practice has continued. Any convention where he was involved as MD included them, and that was a substantial number on the East Coast.

When I’ve judged (and it’s been a while) I found that no matter what form the recording of data took, it was no match for the two-to-one ganging up when judges were inspired to choose one entry over another. That process is what turned me off for judging all but Workmanship, and then only when I’m actually able to attend a con (which won’t be for a very long time, with a weekend job).
Sorry I can’t be more helpful.
-b

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Kevin Roche kevin@twistedimage.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I have to admit to a visceral “You have got to be kidding!” reaction to the “numbers of hours –> skill division” approach.

In part because I have seen novice entries that had been worked on FOREVER and still were very definitely appropriate to enter in the novice category.
Also in part because there are certain costuming skills I have where I’m apparently preternaturally fast. You wouldn’t want to argue my work should be entered in the novice category because it only took me 10 hours to put together.
I’m with Lisa, I think the current version of the ICG guidelines wrt skill division is well-considered, especially with the open option to “compete up” that they recommend.
Kevin

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:28 PM, ‘John O’Halloran’ JohnO@TyeDye.Org [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’m gonna ignore your Topic #1, as this has been raised on the Sasquan Masq staff list.

Judging forms

I’ve judged 2 worldcons, several westercons and lost count of local cons.

Never once have I received a “special” judges form.    The most “judges form” it’s ever been, is a print out of the entry #, Name, Class and big block for notes.  Sometimes it’s been a copy of the full entry sheet and most often, it’s just a pad of paper that we have to track everything.

Personally, The #, Name, Class, Notes and the judges photos, is all I really use.   I don’t think I would ever have time to read/use a form with a bunch more info or ticky boxes.
JohnO

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

 

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

 

Discuss!

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2716 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

We had special judges’ forms at Anticipation and for the Historical at CC 32.  The program we used generated them, with a different set of data from those used by tech or by the MC.  My deputy MD, Sylvain St.Pierre, developed the program.  I’d be happy to share it.  I think it’s easier to use than Marty Gear’s program.

 

Byron

 

 

On Mar 30, 2015, at 4:28 PM, ‘John O’Halloran’ JohnO@TyeDye.Org [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’m gonna ignore your Topic #1, as this has been raised on the Sasquan Masq staff list.

Judging forms

I’ve judged 2 worldcons, several westercons and lost count of local cons.

Never once have I received a “special” judges form.    The most “judges form” it’s ever been, is a print out of the entry #, Name, Class and big block for notes.  Sometimes it’s been a copy of the full entry sheet and most often, it’s just a pad of paper that we have to track everything.

Personally, The #, Name, Class, Notes and the judges photos, is all I really use.   I don’t think I would ever have time to read/use a form with a bunch more info or ticky boxes.
JohnO

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

 

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

 

Discuss!

 

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2717 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

I don’t yet know what I “think” about the suggestions.  They’re very different from what I’m used to as a judges’ clerk, a judge, or a masquerade director and I don’t want to sound as if I’m stepping on them, especially if they’re from a different type of costume competition than our traditional form.  My experience primarily is at Worldcon and Costume-Con masquerades and at East Coast regional conventions, plus Archon.  Before I render opinions, I want more information that I hope Tonya can provide:

 

Skill Divisions:
— What events use the “hours of effort” measure to determine skill level?
— How long have they been doing so?
— How many entries do the events have (broadly speaking)?
— From where, geographically, do the events draw the entrants?
— What are the entires like (original, re-creation, assembled, science fiction, fantasy, media reproduction, and so forth)?
— How and why did you settle on this measure of skill vs. other measures?
Meet the Judges Panels:
— What events offer Meet the Judges panels?
— How long have they been doing so?
— How many/what proportion of the entrants participate?
— When during the event are the panels held?
— Are judges expected/obligated to comment publicly on specific entries?
Byron
On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2718 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Meet the Judges Panels:
— What events offer Meet the Judges panels?
— How long have they been doing so?
— How many/what proportion of the entrants participate?
— When during the event are the panels held?
— Are judges expected/obligated to comment publicly on specific entries?

I like to have the judges show up at the contestant orientation/safety meeting, at least to be introduced.

I like to have the judges show up at the masquerade post-mortem panel.
If it wasn’t overloading the judges, I wouldn’t mind having the judges be on a “this is how judging works” panel before or after the masquerade, but there would have to be strong guidance in place to make sure the judges avoided making inappropriate comments.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2719 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.
I don’t think the majority of this group is on that list, so it’s probably ok to rehash here.

I like Byron’s questions.  I can see potential ways that the proposals *could* work.  Not for me, or the CostumeCon/WorldCon crowd, I think, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s wrong or bad.

~Aurora

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, ‘John O’Halloran’ JohnO@TyeDye.Org [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

I’m gonna ignore your Topic #1, as this has been raised on the Sasquan Masq staff list.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2720 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is

Time spent can easily indicate lack of skill. Lord knows I’ve done enough things the hard way with lots of rework involved because I didn’t know any better.

And time is economy. Rich people have lots of time, poor people have lots of time, young people and and retired people have lots of time, but not everybody has lots of time. There are a lot of students who have tons of time, but upon graduation and job suddenly find themselves with none.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2721 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

That – you’d have to pose to her on the D list.

 

Good discussions!   Keep it going!   Else, I’ll have to pull out another topic.   (hee hee hee)

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I don’t yet know what I “think” about the suggestions.  They’re very different from what I’m used to as a judges’ clerk, a judge, or a masquerade director and I don’t want to sound as if I’m stepping on them, especially if they’re from a different type of costume competition than our traditional form.  My experience primarily is at Worldcon and Costume-Con masquerades and at East Coast regional conventions, plus Archon.  Before I render opinions, I want more information that I hope Tonya can provide:

Skill Divisions:

— What events use the “hours of effort” measure to determine skill level?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many entries do the events have (broadly speaking)?

— From where, geographically, do the events draw the entrants?

— What are the entires like (original, re-creation, assembled, science fiction, fantasy, media reproduction, and so forth)?

— How and why did you settle on this measure of skill vs. other measures?

Meet the Judges Panels:

— What events offer Meet the Judges panels?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many/what proportion of the entrants participate?

— When during the event are the panels held?

— Are judges expected/obligated to comment publicly on specific entries?

Byron

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2722 From: von_drago Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I agree – good questions.

 

I always find it interesting to see how masquerades have evolved in different areas. Sometimes they have really nifty ideas that should be “acquired”. Hopefully they find some ideas themselves from outside their community that they want to use.

 

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 2723 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

On the subject of time, is all time equal? Is 18 hours watching a pot boil the same as 18 hours doing cross stitch?

Let’s say I use a vinyl cutter to set out a pattern of crystals and then heat-set them. I have a beautifully precise piece in 5 hours instead of 70.

Maybe I’m doing Flash Gordon recreations and I just string beads and glue them down, taking far less time than stitching and knotting then individually. But that’s the technique the costume shop used originally.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2724 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

Not even a little like the same. Not only is it less time-consuming to produce something when you’ve practiced the art (hello, learning curve anyone?), but as Andy says, techniques vary. Often within the same piece of work.

-b

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

On the subject of time, is all time equal? Is 18 hours watching a pot boil the same as 18 hours doing cross stitch?

Let’s say I use a vinyl cutter to set out a pattern of crystals and then heat-set them. I have a beautifully precise piece in 5 hours instead of 70.

Maybe I’m doing Flash Gordon recreations and I just string beads and glue them down, taking far less time than stitching and knotting then individually. But that’s the technique the costume shop used originally.

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2725 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/30/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

All good points.   Pretty much what we concluded.   How the heck can you quantify anything like that?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:15 PM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

Not even a little like the same. Not only is it less time-consuming to produce something when you’ve practiced the art (hello, learning curve anyone?), but as Andy says, techniques vary. Often within the same piece of work.

-b

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

On the subject of time, is all time equal? Is 18 hours watching a pot boil the same as 18 hours doing cross stitch?

Let’s say I use a vinyl cutter to set out a pattern of crystals and then heat-set them. I have a beautifully precise piece in 5 hours instead of 70.

Maybe I’m doing Flash Gordon recreations and I just string beads and glue them down, taking far less time than stitching and knotting then individually. But that’s the technique the costume shop used originally.


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2726 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

One more comment and I’m going back to homework again:

Virtually ALL judging is arbitrary and subjective. Quantification is almost impossible when comparing apples to oranges, to kiwi fruit. The best one can hope for is the ability to discern quality based on the current set of whatever’s being presented (sewing skills, construction technique, design ability, presentation, whatever) at the event in question.
The best we can hope for is a common agreement of best practices, not an absolute across-the-board method that works for everyone, because there is no uniformity in art. Just because I don’t like Jackson Pollock’s artworks and I do love Georgia O’Keeffe’s or Salvador Dali’s doesn’t make Pollock’s art irrelevant.
Some days I wish the whole competition aspect of masquerades would just go away, in favor of showing the art for the sake of the art itself. I suspect we’d get a lot more people who just wanted to show off on stage.
Or not.
Then again, I’ve been wishing for that change for decades.
Ah, well. Back to After Effects.
Cheers,
Betsy

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:15 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

All good points.   Pretty much what we concluded.   How the heck can you quantify anything like that?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:15 PM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

Not even a little like the same. Not only is it less time-consuming to produce something when you’ve practiced the art (hello, learning curve anyone?), but as Andy says, techniques vary. Often within the same piece of work.

 

-b

 

 

 

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Trembley attrembl@bovil.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

On the subject of time, is all time equal? Is 18 hours watching a pot boil the same as 18 hours doing cross stitch?

Let’s say I use a vinyl cutter to set out a pattern of crystals and then heat-set them. I have a beautifully precise piece in 5 hours instead of 70.

Maybe I’m doing Flash Gordon recreations and I just string beads and glue them down, taking far less time than stitching and knotting then individually. But that’s the technique the costume shop used originally.

 


 

 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2727 From: staceylee25 Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

Yeeeeeaaaaaaahhh I’m right there with Kevin. I read that and was so stunned that I just didn’t have the capacity to make words in reaction. Rare for me, I know. I was more inclined to hysterical laughter, because I’m a jerk.

I thought back to the time I put into some of my biggest competition pieces, and only the Kingdom of Jin from C31 would have hit the 500 hour mark because I personally built the majority of 4 costumes. “Art of Black and White” might have hit 300? But everything else I’ve ever put on stage I’m pretty sure wouldn’t even have hit the 100 hour mark.

But more than that, I’m entirely in the same boat with those who say, how do you quantify hours spent on things like watching a pot boil – or watching paint dry? Does 5 hours of sanding plastic count as a skill? What if my gorgeous paint job is the equivalent of five minutes applying the paint, waiting 24 hours for it to dry?

Using time as a measure is skewed toward sewing – and I might add, sewing embellishments – which is unfair on a base level, before you even touch the truth that Masters can actually be faster at some of those techniques than a novice. I am actually a terrible embellisher if I have to do it by hand, so if I attempted hand-embroidery I would definitely hit that 500 hour mark. However, I can almost guarantee you my work would be awful and all of you would look askance at me and remind me that you expect better from me. And rightly so. 😉 Let’s not even get into the fact that I’m a professional who makes 100% of my income from a costume profession, and the most I’ve ever spent on a client’s costume is maybe 35-40 hours.

It’s true, workmanship judging isn’t easy. As technology rapidly changes to accommodate the desires of costume-builders and hobbyists, we’re going to face even bigger challenges balancing certain techniques and elements against others. In order to be as fair as possible to entrants, we have to always start from a level playing field, so the ICG guidelines are, IMO, the best way to ensure that level playing field. I have never had a problem with the ICG guidelines, and what’s important to me is that they’re not JUST applicable to Worldcon and Costume-Con. They’re universally applicable. We’ve found in practice, here in Wisconsin where tiny anime cons pop up like weeds every other year (and die off just as quickly) that a lot of people who think their system is better simply haven’t been exposed to an alternate idea, and once they participate in a different system, they experience first-hand just how workable, fair, and enjoyable it is, and go back to their little cons and suddenly the rules and structure of their masquerade changes to look more like ours.

So, while the northwest may have a collection of cons who work “that” way, they might just have never really been exposed to a masquerade run using ICG guidelines.

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <kevin@…> wrote :

I have to admit to a visceral “You have got to be kidding!” reaction to the “numbers of hours –> skill division” approach.

In part because I have seen novice entries that had been worked on FOREVER and still were very definitely appropriate to enter in the novice category.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2728 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

I did not know Tonya was not on runacc.  I am less than comfortable discussing her suggestions in her absence.

 

Bruce, I hope you will invite her to join the discussion.
Byron

 

 

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:00 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

That – you’d have to pose to her on the D list.

 

Good discussions!   Keep it going!   Else, I’ll have to pull out another topic.   (hee hee hee)

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.



I don’t yet know what I “think” about the suggestions.  They’re very different from what I’m used to as a judges’ clerk, a judge, or a masquerade director and I don’t want to sound as if I’m stepping on them, especially if they’re from a different type of costume competition than our traditional form.  My experience primarily is at Worldcon and Costume-Con masquerades and at East Coast regional conventions, plus Archon.  Before I render opinions, I want more information that I hope Tonya can provide:

Skill Divisions:

— What events use the “hours of effort” measure to determine skill level?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many entries do the events have (broadly speaking)?

— From where, geographically, do the events draw the entrants?

— What are the entires like (original, re-creation, assembled, science fiction, fantasy, media reproduction, and so forth)?

— How and why did you settle on this measure of skill vs. other measures?

Meet the Judges Panels:

— What events offer Meet the Judges panels?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many/what proportion of the entrants participate?

— When during the event are the panels held?

— Are judges expected/obligated to comment publicly on specific entries?

Byron

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

 




 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2729 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/31/2015
Subject: Re: Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

 

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:19 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I did not know Tonya was not on runacc.  I am less than comfortable discussing her suggestions in her absence.

Bruce, I hope you will invite her to join the discussion.

Byron

 

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:00 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

That – you’d have to pose to her on the D list.

 

Good discussions!   Keep it going!   Else, I’ll have to pull out another topic.   (hee hee hee)

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:14 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Convention wonking: Judging forms, skill levels etc.

I don’t yet know what I “think” about the suggestions.  They’re very different from what I’m used to as a judges’ clerk, a judge, or a masquerade director and I don’t want to sound as if I’m stepping on them, especially if they’re from a different type of costume competition than our traditional form.  My experience primarily is at Worldcon and Costume-Con masquerades and at East Coast regional conventions, plus Archon.  Before I render opinions, I want more information that I hope Tonya can provide:

Skill Divisions:

— What events use the “hours of effort” measure to determine skill level?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many entries do the events have (broadly speaking)?

— From where, geographically, do the events draw the entrants?

— What are the entires like (original, re-creation, assembled, science fiction, fantasy, media reproduction, and so forth)?

— How and why did you settle on this measure of skill vs. other measures?

Meet the Judges Panels:

— What events offer Meet the Judges panels?

— How long have they been doing so?

— How many/what proportion of the entrants participate?

— When during the event are the panels held?

— Are judges expected/obligated to comment publicly on specific entries?

Byron

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:25 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

So, since most folks see a need for this list, let’s get some discussion going.  When the lot of us get together, we narf about CC stuff.

Topic #1.   What does everyone here think of the recent suggestions by Tonya Adolfson (from the Gem State Guild) that the ICG (and by relation,  CC) on how to determine where one’s skill level is, as well as the “Meet the Judges” panel after the masq, and so on?

Discuss!

Bruce

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2730 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/1/2015
Subject: Access to this list.

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.)
We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.
The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.
I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful.

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?
I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.
Thanks,
Betsy

 

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2731 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/2/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

I favor opening the list, by invitation, to costumers with ideas the SMOCs ought to consider. That would limit additional persons to those we feel should be part of the conversation.  Tonya is a good example.  Whether we agree with her suggestions or not, they deserve discussion and the person who made the suggestion really has to be part of that discussion.  There may be others.

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.)
We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.
The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.
I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful.

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?
I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.
Thanks,
Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2732 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

 

I mostly agree with this, as long as it’s still by invitation.   It probably wouldn’t be of interest to most people, unless they have an interest in the behind the scenes of stuff that goes on at CC, anyway.   That said, I wouldn’t want it to become a forum for complaints by attendees.   This should be a place where future and former staff participants can speak honestly.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 6:43 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.

I favor opening the list, by invitation, to costumers with ideas the SMOCs ought to consider. That would limit additional persons to those we feel should be part of the conversation.  Tonya is a good example.  Whether we agree with her suggestions or not, they deserve discussion and the person who made the suggestion really has to be part of that discussion.  There may be others.

Byron

 

On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

 

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.) 

 

We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.

 

The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.

 

I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful. 

 

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?

 

I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.

 

Thanks,

 

Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2733 From: costumrs Date: 4/8/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

I would support inviting a limited number of folks. Like Nora I think we don’t want the membership too large. But some new blood should always be sought out.
Pierrr
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From: “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04/08/2015 7:39 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list.

 

I mostly agree with this, as long as it’s still by invitation.   It probably wouldn’t be of interest to most people, unless they have an interest in the behind the scenes of stuff that goes on at CC, anyway.   That said, I wouldn’t want it to become a forum for complaints by attendees.   This should be a place where future and former staff participants can speak honestly.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 6:43 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.

I favor opening the list, by invitation, to costumers with ideas the SMOCs ought to consider. That would limit additional persons to those we feel should be part of the conversation.  Tonya is a good example.  Whether we agree with her suggestions or not, they deserve discussion and the person who made the suggestion really has to be part of that discussion.  There may be others.

Byron

 

On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

 

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.) 

 

We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.

 

The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.

 

I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful. 

 

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?

 

I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.

 

Thanks,

 

Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2734 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/9/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

 

The theory is, we should be getting new blood with each new bid that has a new concom.   I don’t recall seeing anyone from CC35 speaking up.    Am I mistaken?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 7:55 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list.

I would support inviting a limited number of folks. Like Nora I think we don’t want the membership too large. But some new blood should always be sought out.

Pierrr

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From: “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04/08/2015 7:39 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list.

I mostly agree with this, as long as it’s still by invitation.   It probably wouldn’t be of interest to most people, unless they have an interest in the behind the scenes of stuff that goes on at CC, anyway.   That said, I wouldn’t want it to become a forum for complaints by attendees.   This should be a place where future and former staff participants can speak honestly.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 6:43 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.

I favor opening the list, by invitation, to costumers with ideas the SMOCs ought to consider. That would limit additional persons to those we feel should be part of the conversation.  Tonya is a good example.  Whether we agree with her suggestions or not, they deserve discussion and the person who made the suggestion really has to be part of that discussion.  There may be others.

Byron

 

On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

 

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.) 

 

We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.

 

The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.

 

I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful. 

 

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?

 

I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.

 

Thanks,

 

Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2735 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/9/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:21 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

The theory is, we should be getting new blood with each new bid that has a new concom.   I don’t recall seeing anyone from CC35 speaking up.    Am I mistaken?

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 7:55 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list.




I would support inviting a limited number of folks. Like Nora I think we don’t want the membership too large. But some new blood should always be sought out.

Pierrr

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone



——– Original message ——–
From: “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> 
Date: 04/08/2015 7:39 PM (GMT-06:00) 
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list. 

  

I mostly agree with this, as long as it’s still by invitation.   It probably wouldn’t be of interest to most people, unless they have an interest in the behind the scenes of stuff that goes on at CC, anyway.   That said, I wouldn’t want it to become a forum for complaints by attendees.   This should be a place where future and former staff participants can speak honestly.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 6:43 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.



I favor opening the list, by invitation, to costumers with ideas the SMOCs ought to consider. That would limit additional persons to those we feel should be part of the conversation.  Tonya is a good example.  Whether we agree with her suggestions or not, they deserve discussion and the person who made the suggestion really has to be part of that discussion.  There may be others.

Byron

On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

 

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.) 

 

We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.

 

The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.

 

I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful. 

 

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

 

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?

 

I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.

 

Thanks,

 

Betsy

 

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.

 

Bruce

 

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 








 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2736 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

Byron has a point. We tend to reuse volunteers for our concoms, even if the chairs change. Theoretically, we all serve once, but there are folks who’ve served multiple times, and many of these people just swap jobs.

We haven’t had whole committees on this list, just chairs and treasurers (I think). We could theoretically broaden the invitation to more concom members, but there’s that same signal to noise ratio issue to deal with.
I know (I think) that Byron was being facetious, but I think term limits happen due to attrition and distraction. Just saying. 8)
-b

 

 

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

Byron

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2737 From: kittythecanuck Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.
A few of us from CC35 joined when we won the bid.  We read the info, but as you said, it’s not very active right now so we haven’t been visiting much.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2738 From: JBdashoff@aol.com Date: 4/10/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

Since icg is open for all discussions,
I think keeping runacc@ as a closed group  to which we can choose whom to add makes for a better discussion zone for costumecons.
Joni Dashoff Lunatyk Phrynge /DVCG/CC33 treasurer
ps since I’ve been listening without speaking for years I’ll bet Betsy forgot I was on this list.

 

 

—–Original Message—–

From: Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com>

To: List, Run a CC <runacc@yahoogroups.com>

Sent: Wed, Apr 1, 2015 12:05 am

Subject: [runacc] Access to this list.

 

 

Well, now, that’s an entirely different question. So different, in fact, that I’ve changed the subject. So there.

Up till this very moment, RunaCC has been invite-only, generally designed as a catch-all conversation and archive devoted to SMOCing. (Secret Masters of Costuming. You know who you are.)
We’ve mostly done it in the halls of cons at 3am, or post con when the dust has settled. The list exists to serve a specific set of purposes – to share information from year to year and serve as an institutional memory when the memory fades over time and those who attended at the start can’t attend anymore, for whatever reason.
The list dates back to sometime after Costume-Con Fifteen, but while I’m technically the owner, the actual owner is Karen, and really always has been.
I attempted to compile a floating supply box (that I’m pretty sure got lost in transit sometime a year or so after CCXV). This list was a lot more successful.

If we were to announce an open invitation to join the conversation, we’d potentially invite more than we’ve bargained for. On the other hand, fresh perspective was always part of the point here, as well as the lofty goal of avoiding reinventing the wheel every single year.

So, I’ll put it to Karen (as Service Mark Holder) and to those already on the list: How do folks feel about opening the list up to folks who aren’t directly responsible for producing CCs?
I know what I think on the subject, but it’s really not up to me.
Thanks,
Betsy
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:12 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’
casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]
<runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Not my place.   But if Betsy wants to, by all means.
 
Bruce

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

 

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2739 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – “term limits”

 

 

Getting new chapters to throw a CC helps.   We were needling certain MNSOC members at Teslacon last year, and they seemed to be at least mulling over the idea of a future bid.   At least, with more regions involved, it helps get a wider rotation of the “oldsters” who may feel obligated to step in if no bid arises.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 8:25 AM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.

Byron has a point. We tend to reuse volunteers for our concoms, even if the chairs change. Theoretically, we all serve once, but there are folks who’ve served multiple times, and many of these people just swap jobs.

We haven’t had whole committees on this list, just chairs and treasurers (I think). We could theoretically broaden the invitation to more concom members, but there’s that same signal to noise ratio issue to deal with.

I know (I think) that Byron was being facetious, but I think term limits happen due to attrition and distraction. Just saying. 8)

-b

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

Byron

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2740 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list.

 

 

Ah good!   Well, then, it’s time to stir up more trouble!    (rubs hands)

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 9:26 AM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [runacc] Access to this list.

A few of us from CC35 joined when we won the bid.  We read the info, but as you said, it’s not very active right now so we haven’t been visiting much.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2741 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/16/2015
Subject: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2742 From: staceylee25 Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2743 From: Kevin Roche Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Stace — I have a radical idea for you.

“Costumes seen in the hall beforehand are not eligible for Best in Show. ”

On Friday, April 17, 2015, staceylee25@yahoo.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2744 From: ECM Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

Betsy, I agree wholeheartedly!  And I agree that you must continue to repeat yourself on their websites.

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami
who is urging everyone to vote for CC36 in San Diego!


 

 

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2745 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Somehow I think this response was intended for Stacie. 8)

-B

 

 

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, ECM ecmami@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Betsy, I agree wholeheartedly!  And I agree that you must continue to repeat yourself on their websites.

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami
who is urging everyone to vote for CC36 in San Diego!


 

 

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2746 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

As someone who works with the Toronto/Montreal/Ottawa—Ontario/Quebec community extensively,

I encourage costumers to save their new “wow” costumes for the masquerade, and wear last years “Wow” costume in the halls. Alternatively save “Wow” for Sunday after the masquerade has taken place. It’s not always easy as people usually are scrambling to leave on Sunday and drive back home for work.

The second should be easier to encourage at Costume-Con where people often stay the extra  day and aren’t always scrambling at 10am Sunday to check out of their hotel rooms. Also the post masquerade Show-and-Tell sessions on Sunday really gave first timers a new POV on this. 🙂

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:03:10 -0500
Subject: [runacc] Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2747 From: Kaijugal . Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

Stace wrote: “genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance” , “Genderswap guy” was Niq Vanderaa (Detailed Illusion), one half of Canada’s World Cosplay Summit Team for this coming year.

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:40:08 -0700
Subject: [runacc] Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2748 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – “term limits”

 

As I read the ConStitution,it does not limit bids to those from ICG chapters.  If we want to broaden participation, perhaps we should encourage other costuming groups to bid to host Costume-Con.

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:39 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Getting new chapters to throw a CC helps.   We were needling certain MNSOC members at Teslacon last year, and they seemed to be at least mulling over the idea of a future bid.   At least, with more regions involved, it helps get a wider rotation of the “oldsters” who may feel obligated to step in if no bid arises.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 8:25 AM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.




Byron has a point. We tend to reuse volunteers for our concoms, even if the chairs change. Theoretically, we all serve once, but there are folks who’ve served multiple times, and many of these people just swap jobs.

We haven’t had whole committees on this list, just chairs and treasurers (I think). We could theoretically broaden the invitation to more concom members, but there’s that same signal to noise ratio issue to deal with.

I know (I think) that Byron was being facetious, but I think term limits happen due to attrition and distraction. Just saying. 8)

-b

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

Byron

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/




 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2749 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups

 

 

True enough, but to really get the manpower, you’re frequently drawing from whole chapters.   Of course, that’s not been the trend more recently.   Yet, other groups need to make sure they make an effort to become part of and understand our community/culture.  Otherwise, we run into the problem of concoms who think running a CC is interchangeable with any other con they’ve staffed.   No – no, it’s not.

 

You might recall we had a bid from Eau Claire a few years back.   (Practically) no one knew who they were and they did not win the bid, not surprisingly.

 

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:58 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list – “term limits”

As I read the ConStitution,it does not limit bids to those from ICG chapters.  If we want to broaden participation, perhaps we should encourage other costuming groups to bid to host Costume-Con.

Byron

 

On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:39 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Getting new chapters to throw a CC helps.   We were needling certain MNSOC members at Teslacon last year, and they seemed to be at least mulling over the idea of a future bid.   At least, with more regions involved, it helps get a wider rotation of the “oldsters” who may feel obligated to step in if no bid arises.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 8:25 AM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.

Byron has a point. We tend to reuse volunteers for our concoms, even if the chairs change. Theoretically, we all serve once, but there are folks who’ve served multiple times, and many of these people just swap jobs.

We haven’t had whole committees on this list, just chairs and treasurers (I think). We could theoretically broaden the invitation to more concom members, but there’s that same signal to noise ratio issue to deal with.

I know (I think) that Byron was being facetious, but I think term limits happen due to attrition and distraction. Just saying. 8)

-b

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

Byron

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2750 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

 

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.
The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.
Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).
Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.
At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.
So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.
“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.
Byron the Boring
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

New subject:

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

Discuss!

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2751 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Access to this list – bid groups

 

Maybe our culture needs to take steps to encompass theirs?

 

Byron

 

 

On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:35 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

True enough, but to really get the manpower, you’re frequently drawing from whole chapters.   Of course, that’s not been the trend more recently.   Yet, other groups need to make sure they make an effort to become part of and understand our community/culture.  Otherwise, we run into the problem of concoms who think running a CC is interchangeable with any other con they’ve staffed.   No – no, it’s not.

 

You might recall we had a bid from Eau Claire a few years back.   (Practically) no one knew who they were and they did not win the bid, not surprisingly.

 

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:58 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list – “term limits”



As I read the ConStitution,it does not limit bids to those from ICG chapters.  If we want to broaden participation, perhaps we should encourage other costuming groups to bid to host Costume-Con.

Byron

On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:39 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Getting new chapters to throw a CC helps.   We were needling certain MNSOC members at Teslacon last year, and they seemed to be at least mulling over the idea of a future bid.   At least, with more regions involved, it helps get a wider rotation of the “oldsters” who may feel obligated to step in if no bid arises.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 8:25 AM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] Access to this list.




Byron has a point. We tend to reuse volunteers for our concoms, even if the chairs change. Theoretically, we all serve once, but there are folks who’ve served multiple times, and many of these people just swap jobs.

We haven’t had whole committees on this list, just chairs and treasurers (I think). We could theoretically broaden the invitation to more concom members, but there’s that same signal to noise ratio issue to deal with.

I know (I think) that Byron was being facetious, but I think term limits happen due to attrition and distraction. Just saying. 8)

-b

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



Unfortunately, we’re not getting very much in the way of new blood since we tend to keep volunteering to serve on concoms.  I’m certainly guilty, as are others I could name.  Maybe we need term limits for SMOCs?

Byron

 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/




 



 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2752 From: ECM Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

 

True.  Sorry.  ~.~

E


 

 

Somehow I think this response was intended for Stacie. 8)

-B

 

 

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, ECM ecmami@hotmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Betsy, I agree wholeheartedly!  And I agree that you must continue to repeat yourself on their websites.

However, I’m a little sneaky – as a person “my age” is entitled to be.  I would be very generous with hall costume awards.  VERY generous.  Then put in the rule that costumes that have won hall costume awards will be in the masquerade as “exhibition only.  Not in competition.”  It won’t shorten the parade any, but might have some impact on the costumers, and will surely help the judges.

Elaine Mami
who is urging everyone to vote for CC36 in San Diego!


 

 

Excellent topic.

I have always maintained, and even said so multiple times on cosplay.com (typing until my fingers cramped, so to speak), that people will have this viewpoint UNTIL someone shows them a different way of doing things. Whenever anyone has asked, and been open to all advice, I always say “just try it once, and you might realize you like the way it feels when you get that surprise factor in!” A lot of people default to what everyone else is doing, and don’t really think about it one way or the other, or if asked why they don’t save the surprise for the stage, parrot what everyone else is saying (“I want to wear it as much as I can”).

As the director for SF&F for 34, I want SO BADLY to put in a rule that you can’t wear your competition costume in the hall prior to Saturday. I want to. I haven’t yet because I don’t know what our members will want. What I’m unsure about is whether it’s enough to simply encourage people to save the surprise for the stage, to be genial and optimistic and phrase it was “well we’re really like to see…but in the end it’s your choice,” or if the only way to get people into the habit is to make it an explicit rule.

Because really, it is a habit. It’s something that, once you give it a try, you realize is actually a really good idea. Especially once your builds start getting so big that wearing it in the hall becomes almost impossible, and while some people learn from their mistakes, not all do. Some people will still wear their heavy, hot armor or their 10-foot-wide wings or their 20-foot long trains in the hall due to habit and inertia, rather than wising up and not getting their costumes dirty, damaged, or start to hate the mere thought of wearing it another five minutes.

CC32 was a good example of exactly why it’s a good idea to save your competition piece for the competition. The masquerade was way over-booked. It went on way too long. But what really made it a chore to sit through was the fact that we had seen 80% of these costumes in the halls all day – if not for two days! And when they came to stage, they didn’t bring us anything new to see – they didn’t do more than a circle-walk-on. We rolled our eyes at the glut of Frozen costumes, but I will at least give the genderswap guy kudos for putting on an actual performance. Sure, I had already been touching the beading on his costume a few hours before, so seeing the outfit was boring, but he took it up a notch. If you’re going to wear the costume all day and only walk across the stage? It’s pointless to even enter.

One of the bad habits the younger generation is picking up is the idea that if you’re wearing a costume, no matter how simple, you should enter it in competition. On the one hand, we do like to encourage novices to take a brave step onto stage, but on the other hand, when you have 50 slots for your masquerade and 40 of them are taken up by novices who are entering solo with a character they can’t even think up a performance for, merely because they have a costume, it weighs down the quality of the masquerade. It’s a catch-22 – you don’t want to discourage novices, but at the same time, a director has to consider the quality of the show and the value for the audience. If you’re going to get a hundred feedback forms post-con and most of them tell you the masquerade sucked because all the entries were boring and lame…well, as a director, you can’t improve the show with that kind of feedback. You’re at the mercy of who enters with what. So it really falls to the community as a whole to develop different habits, so that you can be both encouraging AND put on a great show.

What bugs me most is that wearing competition costumes in the hall actually does prejudice or fatigue the judges, and people don’t even think about this. They’re more focused on their own gratification rather than the whole concept of why the contest exists and what they’re doing in it. They don’t realize that the judges are not nuns sequestered away for the weekend, they’re congoers too and they’re in the halls enjoying themselves while subconsciously evaluating costumes. So by the time that same costume appears before the judging table, the judge may have already made up their mind. Or they’re so plain tired of seeing the costume that they don’t care. It’s unfortunate, but it’s human nature, and it’s something you can’t steel your mind against. If you can’t prevent the judges from THINKING about the costumes, you can at least prevent them from SEEING the costumes by forbidding the wearing.

Maybe it also comes down to encouraging people with “yes, I know you worked hard and want to wear it a lot. Wear it AFTER the show. Wear it Sunday and Monday. Wear it at the NEXT con you’re going to, when it’s no longer in competition and you can enjoy it.” But mostly it’s about developing the habit. I don’t think the days of the surprise on stage are over, and I personally want to see this particular habit stay relevant. I just don’t know, outside of long-windedly blathering on cosplay forums/facebook to try to get it through thick heads (like I do) HOW to cultivate the habit. HOW to get people to give the surprise a try.

At least people who are working so hard on a build that it isn’t finished until the day of the competition automatically save their costume for the stage. It’s probably not a preferable method but it works. 😉

Stace

—In runacc@yahoogroups.com, <casamai@…> wrote :

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?
In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2753 From: Aurora Celeste Date: 4/17/2015
Subject: Re: Hall costumes are becoming the Competition costumes

Although I understand the sentiment behind the rule, I just can’t get behind it because I see too much area for confusion.  For example, at CC 32 there was quite a line for the Green Room and lots of people came early and stood in the hall.  It was, in my opinion, early enough that a judge may not have realized in the elevator that it was time.  There’s also the question of people wanting to wear their costume to rehearsal and getting there.  I know most of us carry or wear part of the costume, but there are some costumes and/or presentations where it may be important, but judges may not realize in the elevator at 11:00 am that they should look the other way.  Imo it’s better to get judges who can work to put that aside and judge the workmanship based on the information given and the presentation based on what was onstage.  Nigh-impossible, I agree, but we already trust our judges with not remembering other Masquerades where they saw a similar costume or not judging a costumer’s past work when considering this current contest, and I feel this is no different.

~Aurora

 

On Friday, April 17, 2015, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’d like to use a few electrons to look at how we got here.  Kevin and Andy really are the historians of costuming, however, and I hope they’ll chime in.

In the beginning there were hall costumes.  There were no competition costumes because there were no competitions.  In 1939, Forry Ackerman and Morojo worse costumes Morojo made to the very first World Science Fiction Convention (NYCon 1).  To the best of my knowledge, no one else did so.  Over time, as more fen began to wear them (e.g., E.E. “Doc” Smith, who liked to dress as his Lensman character, Kimball Kinnison), concoms began to organize events at which they could show them off.  These were very much masquerade parties, not stage shows.  As time went on, opportunities were given for persons in costume to step up to a microphone and talk about their costume.
The popularity of costume-wearing at SF cons became so great that, by the time the masquerade party had morphed into a stage show, entries frequently exceed 100 in number and the “Masquerade” could run for hours.  To reduce the size of masquerades, MDs began to use a rule that no costume seen in the hall before the masquerade could be entered.  This actually was very effective in cutting the number of masquerade entries down to a reasonable size (e.g., 50).  The first version of the ICG’s masquerade guidelines included the suggestion that such a commonly found rule be included.  That version was adopted by ballots counted at the 1992 ICG annual meeting (at CC 10).  It worked.
Costume-Con is a child of SF conventions.  Its structure is very similar.  Like SF cons, we have programming, social events, a dealers’ room, and competitions.  The costume exhibit essentially is a replacement for the SF con art show.  Similar to worldcons, we bid years in advance for the right to hold a CC and the current members vote on the bid(s).  While we don’t have the equivalent of the Hugo awards, the multiple competitions in a sense fill that niche.  We give tacit recognition to local costuming clubs, especially ICG chapters, much as local SF clubs participate in the worldcon (especially if they hold their own local SF conventions).  We’ve even had a Guest of Honor on occasion (e.g., CC 33).
Since the time we included a “no hall costumes in the masquerade” guideline in the ICG Guidelines in 1992, the wearing of hall costumes declined in popularity at SF cons, though not so much at CCs.  Masquerades also had gotten smaller.  That, I believe, was the principal reason that the current ICG Fairness Guidelines dropped that provision when they were adopted in 2006. It was no longer needed.  It had become common for masquerades at local and regional sf cons, and even at worldcons, to number fewer than 25.  In 2009, for example, the Anticipation masquerade (Montreal) had 30 entries; in 2011, the Chicon 7 masquerade had 27.  Costume-Cons followed a similar trend to smaller masquerades.  The CC 11 SFF masquerade had 43 entries.  The CC 29 SFF masquerade had 32; the CC 31 SFF masquerade had 31.
At CC 32, the SFF masquerade had 79 entries, 2 1/2 times the number the year before.  This was not just because of cosplayers attracted to the first CC in Ontario since CC 13, since even the Historical, which is lucky to have 20 entries, had 31.  CC 32 also set a new record for memberships.  At this point, I have absolutely no idea how much pent up costuming energy there is for CC 33.  Ther has never been a CC in the South and few southern SF cons have masquerades, so we may get a lot of members and entries.  The same may be true for 34, in Madison Wisconsin, although there have been mid-western CCs.  It may not be true for 35 in Mississauga, only three years after 32 in Toronto.
So, should you once again exclude hall costumes from the masquerade?  If you want to, go ahead; the MD’s word is law.  If you believe a CC (or any other con with a masquerade) is likely to have a very large number of members both desiring to show hall costumes and to enter the masquerade, you may want to do so in order to reduce the number of entries.  It worked in the past; it may do so again.  You have other options, however, such as restricting the availability of some awards.
“Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?”  Those days are relatively recent — only about 20 years old.  They don’t represent the long-term trend.  Whether that’s good or bad is up to you.  As one experienced performance judge, I’m not much concerned about the “wow” factor being reduced by having seen the costume in the halls.  I generally don’t remember that I’ve seen the costume in the halls and, anyway, I’m also looking at it under optimum lighting and as presented to the audience with the intended soundtrack.  Those factors all are missing in the halls.  We may want to ask other judges for their views on this point.
Byron the Boring
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:03 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

This oughtta stir some debate:   🙂

 

New subject:

 

 

More of our CC memberships are being filled with the ranks of costumers coming from the cosplay community.   At conventions that cater to that demographic, the emphasis is more about wearing their “wow” costumes in the halls for maximum effect.     Often, the costume contests are seemingly more about getting all their fans in one room to cheer them on, rather than a “masquerade”.   This environment was pretty much the case in Toronto.   Don’t get me wrong – it was great having all those new people.   And I applauded efforts to try to impress our “con culture upon all those new folks “.

 

I recognize that we must reach out to these costumers for the sake of getting new blood, but is there a risk of making too much of an accommodation?   I remember one person on Cosplay.com (a forum that, at least USED to be, a place CC concoms should be paying attention to) said “I spent a lot of time on my one costume and I want to wear it as much as I can”.   So, they wore it pretty much everywhere.   They were not the only ones.   Now, in some ways, I can’t blame them for thinking that way.   But, stay with me here.

 

Any “wow” factor has been lost by the time they get on stage.   Chances are, the judges will have seen them at some point, beforehand.   This makes the costume less “fresh”.   It’s also not as much fun for the judges because they’ve seen it already – part of the fun for them is the surprise factor.    

 

I suspect this year’s CC will feel more “old school”, but I wonder what will happen at CC34 and subsequently, at 35?

 

Are the days of saving one’s competition costume for the stage fading?

 

Should there be more of an effort to encourage people not to wear their competition costume in the halls before the masquerade?

In my opinion, you have a better masquerade without a “preview”.

 

 

 

Discuss!