Yahoo Archive: Page 33 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 33 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 1601 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1602 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1603 From: Martin Gear Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1604 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1605 From: bruno@soulmasque.com Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1606 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1607 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1608 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: CC Merchandising
Group: runacc Message: 1609 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: A special CC event
Group: runacc Message: 1610 From: tinathebookworm Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event
Group: runacc Message: 1611 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event
Group: runacc Message: 1612 From: Karen Heim Date: 8/29/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event
Group: runacc Message: 1613 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 9/8/2007
Subject: Question about stuff in the dealers room
Group: runacc Message: 1614 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/8/2007
Subject: Re: Question about stuff in the dealers room
Group: runacc Message: 1615 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 9/9/2007
Subject: Re: Question about stuff in the dealers room
Group: runacc Message: 1616 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 10/31/2007
Subject: News from Costume-Con 26 in honor of a costumers’ holiday
Group: runacc Message: 1617 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/23/2007
Subject: Demographics & other CC25 observations
Group: runacc Message: 1618 From: tinathebookworm Date: 11/23/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 1619 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 11/24/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 1620 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 11/24/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s
Group: runacc Message: 1621 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 11/27/2007
Subject: [Fwd: Important notice from Costume-Con 26 about our email addresses
Group: runacc Message: 1622 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 1/2/2008
Subject: paging the sick pups…
Group: runacc Message: 1623 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/5/2008
Subject: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1624 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1625 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1626 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…
Group: runacc Message: 1627 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…
Group: runacc Message: 1628 From: Dave Doering Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1629 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…
Group: runacc Message: 1630 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1631 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
Group: runacc Message: 1632 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/9/2008
Subject: Costume magazine
Group: runacc Message: 1633 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1634 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1635 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1636 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1637 From: Martin Gear Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1638 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1639 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1640 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1641 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1642 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/27/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1643 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/27/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update
Group: runacc Message: 1644 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Last-minute recruiting…
Group: runacc Message: 1645 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…
Group: runacc Message: 1646 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…
Group: runacc Message: 1647 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…
Group: runacc Message: 1648 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…
Group: runacc Message: 1649 From: Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention Ch Date: 4/21/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting… house manager found
Group: runacc Message: 1650 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/30/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting… house manager found

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 1601 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

On Aug 1, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Ummm… The CC26 logo lurking to the right?

We’re giving Jan a chance to follow it up with the webmaster friendly-
like (since she knows him), but if that doesn’t pan out by next week
their head office and their hosting company are getting DMCA take-
down notices.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1602 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

In a message dated 8/1/2007 1:40:52 AM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> http://www.dragoncon.net/costuming/
>
> Well, beside that it’s ugly…
>
> andy
>
>
>
>
>

They are using your Sewing Machine Logo?
Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1603 From: Martin Gear Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

Given my experience with the “people in charge” at DragonCon, I’d start
to draft the DMCA notices.
YMMV –
Marty

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Ummm… The CC26 logo lurking to the right?
>
> We’re giving Jan a chance to follow it up with the webmaster friendly-
> like (since she knows him), but if that doesn’t pan out by next week
> their head office and their hosting company are getting DMCA take-
> down notices.
>
> andy
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1604 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

Didn’t even bother to attempt original art based on the design.

Charming.

-b

Andrew Trembley wrote:

> http://www.dragoncon.net/costuming/
>
> Well, beside that it’s ugly…
>
> andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1605 From: bruno@soulmasque.com Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

I’m assuming it used to be where the broken pic link is now.

Michael

Quoting Betsy Delaney <bdelaney@hawkeswood.com>:

> Didn’t even bother to attempt original art based on the design.
>
> Charming.
>
> -b
>
> Andrew Trembley wrote:
>> http://www.dragoncon.net/costuming/
>>
>> Well, beside that it’s ugly…
>>
>> andy
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1606 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

bruno@soulmasque.com wrote:

> I’m assuming it used to be where the broken pic link is now.
>

Yeah, that would have been it. The webmaster is using GoLive and there
are a ton of “(empty reference)” URLs because the target was never
linked; looks like he unlinked that image pretty quickly.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1607 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/2/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

In a message dated 8/2/2007 2:05:38 AM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> Yeah, that would have been it. The webmaster is using GoLive and there
> are a ton of “(empty reference)” URLs because the target was never
> linked; looks like he unlinked that image pretty quickly.

If they hadn’t, it may have been a job for
The Armed Costumers Guild!

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1608 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: CC Merchandising
Hello!

How is or did merchandise, such as T-shirts and tote bags, working to bring
in extra cash for Costume Cons? I know that all the glasses that we made for
CC21 went.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1609 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: A special CC event
Hello, again!

What does everyone think about having a blood drive at CC?

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1610 From: tinathebookworm Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event

I am a regular blood donor at the drives at the hospital where I
work. As long as I can plan ahead so that donating blood @ the con
doesn’t conflict with that, I think it’s a great idea. (I was
willing to do so @ NASFIC, but it turned out that I had given too
recently, by about 2 weeks, and wasn’t eligible.)

Tina

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, osierhenry@… wrote:
>
> Hello, again!
>
> What does everyone think about having a blood drive at CC?
>
> Henry Osier
> Chief Spy
> Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
> www.CC28.org

 

Group: runacc Message: 1611 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 8/28/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event
The reason I ask is that I, too, am a regular donor. I finally hit the 24
pint mark just before CC25. And the company that I work for provides copiers and
fax machines to the Wisconsin Blood Center. http://www.bcw.edu They are very
happy to come to events and do blood drives. When Milwaukee had a regular SF
con, it used to always have a blood drive.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1612 From: Karen Heim Date: 8/29/2007
Subject: Re: A special CC event

They’d only take my blood if I lied to them . . .

Their loss.

Karen

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:55:29 EDT
osierhenry@cs.com wrote:

> The reason I ask is that I, too, am a regular donor. I
>finally hit the 24
> pint mark just before CC25. And the company that I work
>for provides copiers and
> fax machines to the Wisconsin Blood Center.
>http://www.bcw.edu They are very
> happy to come to events and do blood drives. When
>Milwaukee had a regular SF
> con, it used to always have a blood drive.
>
> Henry Osier
> Chief Spy
> Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
> www.CC28.org
> View the latest Intell:
>http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
> Questions?:
>http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1613 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 9/8/2007
Subject: Question about stuff in the dealers room
Hello!

Question: Do you think that a dealer with tanned deerskins, beads, sinew,
etc., would go over well at a costume-con?

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1614 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 9/8/2007
Subject: Re: Question about stuff in the dealers room

Dunno!

I know we’ve had such a dealer at one CC at least. U won’t swear to it,
but I recall it as CC11. I don’t know how well they did.

IMO, if you’re pushing the con to folks who do mountain man recreations,
old west re-enactors and the like, you’ll likely have interest.

Does that help?

Cheers,

Betsy

osierhenry@cs.com wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Question: Do you think that a dealer with tanned deerskins, beads, sinew,
> etc., would go over well at a costume-con?
>
> Henry Osier
> Chief Spy
> Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
> www.CC28.org
> View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
> Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy Delaney

 

Group: runacc Message: 1615 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 9/9/2007
Subject: Re: Question about stuff in the dealers room

In a message dated 9/8/2007 7:46:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
bdelaney@hawkeswood.com writes:

> I know we’ve had such a dealer at one CC at least. U won’t swear to it,
> but I recall it as CC11. I don’t know how well they did.
>
> IMO, if you’re pushing the con to folks who do mountain man recreations,
> old west re-enactors and the like, you’ll likely have interest.
>
> Does that help?

Yes, Betsy. It does. In my experience, I know that costumers have a need for
garment weight leather at times. I know a couple that deals those sorts of
things and am trying to gauge how interested costumers might be in them.

Thanks!

Henry

PS How’s Dan and the kids?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1616 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 10/31/2007
Subject: News from Costume-Con 26 in honor of a costumers’ holiday
In celebration of one of our favorite costumed holidays, I’m happy to
announce as chair of Costume-Con 26 that weekend membership rates will
*NOT* increase tonight as originally planned.

Adult Weekend Memberships will remain at the current price of $85 for
the remainder of 2007, with a planned rate increase on January 1, 2008.

This means that you can purchase memberships for your friends as holiday
gifts! (*Which* holiday you choose to present them in celebration of we
leave as an exercise for the reader.)

We now return you to your regularly scheduled costuming…

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 1617 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 11/23/2007
Subject: Demographics & other CC25 observations

Been meaning to send this info for awhile & since I’m cleaning up the
computer (deleting, removing, saving to external storage, etc.), here’s some
numbers & observations from CC25 as Treasurer, Promotional Materials
Coordinator & Membership Coordinator – Nora

Badgeholders: original print run 263
We have 33 left
Feedback: Mostly positive, some personal preferences for other types but
most liked the usefulness with all the pockets, etc.
Conclusion: Successful, despite some minor objections (very few) most people
liked them & plan to re-use.

Pins: original order 300
We have 67 left
Feedback: Very positive; looked good, shiny
Conclusion: Major plus; good idea we missed – could have been used alone
(w/o badge) as evening ID or on complicated costumes.

Branding: Use of flames & logo throughout – pubs, badges, pins, signage
Conclusion: Very successful – bright, identifiable; made for a unified look
throughout all our efforts.

Demographics:
265 Members
In advance – 233
PayPal – 59
At the Door – 32
In Attendance – 221
Used “alias” – 57
Year joined:
2004 – 30
2005 – 33
2006 – 92
2007 – 109
Voting Fees – 58
VF Only – 4
VF Converted – 54
Sat Only – 11
Sun Only – 1
Student – 11
Staff – 45
Dealers – 9
Transferred –
Supporting – 2
Free-Award – 14
Awardees that attended – 7
Free-Other – 4
Press – 2
Had to be mailed post-con – 30

Observations: Almost half registered in the last 3 months. Single days &
Students definitely worth doing even if they don’t pull in many people.
Almost 20% used “alias” option – may mean nothing but it was moderately
popular. Approximately 20% used PayPal.
Conclusions: Memberships habits have definitely shifted. PayPal very good.

Optional info:
Age: 244 responses
Over 21 – 224
18-21 – 8
13-18 – 10
0-12 – 1
Member of ICG Chapter: 214 responses
Yes – 28
No – 126
Wants to receive future CC mailings: 214 responses
Yes – 193
No – 21
Multiple pubs 2 or more members @ one address: 72 responses
Yes – 10
No – 72
Past CCs: 211 responses
All – 1
Many – 3
Some – 2
22 – 2
21 – 1
20 – 2
18 – 1
17 – 2
16 – 2
15 – 1
14 – 2

>12 – 1

11 – 2
10 – 6
9 – 7
8 – 2
7 – 1
6 – 7
5 – 9
4 – 13
3 – 6
2 – 19
1 – 42
0 – 77

Of those who responded:
Observations: Our demographic is over 21, not a member of the ICG &
interested in future CCs (probably dependant on location). Of multiple
members at one address, only 10% wanted individual publications, the rest
could share through the entire household. And approximately 1/3 were first
timers.

 

Group: runacc Message: 1618 From: tinathebookworm Date: 11/23/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s
This is an offshoot triggered by the CC-25 info: in cleaning out paper
stuff recently, I came across a preliminary budget worksheet for CC-
18. That’s quite a while back, and I don’t have a final post-con
breakdown, but if this is something that anyone would find useful as a
planning tool (however outdated), I will save it and pass it on,
rather than discarding it. Archives?

Tina

 

Group: runacc Message: 1619 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 11/24/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s

Archives would appreciate it, thanks.

Ricky and I are taking this over from Betsy, so contact us offlist as to where to send it.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: tinathebookworm
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 11:32 PM
Subject: [runacc] Re: Demographics other CC’s

This is an offshoot triggered by the CC-25 info: in cleaning out paper
stuff recently, I came across a preliminary budget worksheet for CC-
18. That’s quite a while back, and I don’t have a final post-con
breakdown, but if this is something that anyone would find useful as a
planning tool (however outdated), I will save it and pass it on,
rather than discarding it. Archives?

Tina

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.4/1147 – Release Date: 11/23/2007 9:19 AM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1620 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 11/24/2007
Subject: Re: Demographics other CC’s
Tina,
Do you have the ability to scan it and e-mail it to me?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1621 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 11/27/2007
Subject: [Fwd: Important notice from Costume-Con 26 about our email addresses
I sent this note originally via our registration system; I am forwarding
it to several interested lists to help get the word out.

You may forward/repost it in its entirety to help get the word out.

Kevin

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Important notice from Costume-Con 26 about our email addresses
Date: 27 Nov 2007 20:37:46 -0000
From: chair@cc26.org
To: chair@cc26.org

To all Costume-Con 26 online users:

This message is being broadcast to all users who have registered an email
address in the Costume-Con 26 database.

We recently discovered that a number of Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
have stopped delivering email to and from “.info” domains due to large
quantities of spam being sent from such domains. The ISPs doing so do not
send any bounce or error messages, they simply discard the messages.

When we selected cc26.info as our domain over 5 years ago, this was not a
problem. We only discovered it recently when we realized a large number of
Future Fashion Folio designers never received their acceptance notices, and
upon investigation learned that we had not received inquiries from them,
either.

Fortunately, we also own the cc26.org domain. Effective immediately, we
shall shift our email addresses to the .org domain. All the previous
addresses have been migrated (for instance, chair@cc26.info is now
chair@cc26.org), and the contact page on our website is being updated with
the new addresses.

Our website will remain at www.cc26.info; this problem *only* affects email
delivery. Email already in the pipeline to .info addresses will forward to
the new .org addresses (*if* it is delivered to our server).

I apologize for any confusion this may cause you, and hope you will bear
with us during any glitches caused by the transition.

Thank you for your patience, and your support of Costume-Con 26.

Kevin Roche
Chair, Costume-Con 26

 

Group: runacc Message: 1622 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 1/2/2008
Subject: paging the sick pups…
I’ve been trying to email y’all and all the @sickpups.org addresses I
have keep bouncing.

Can you email me offlist?

Thanks!

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 1623 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/5/2008
Subject: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
My memory is somewhat unreliable on this question, since I’m usually
involved in the fashion show somehow.

Is it traditional to have no other program items running during the
Sunday Fashion Show, or has that varied from year to year?

Thanks!

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 1624 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…

FFS has typically been treated as a “Big Tent” item (like the Historical and F&S/F) with no counterprogramming, although I think CC22 may have had some Historical track item against it…?

Do you feel a need to do counterprogramming because of time (to fit all program items in) or space (because the room for the FFS won’t hold all the members of the convention) considerations? Otherwise, I would strongly urge you not to counterprogram for the hour or so the FFS will take.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:57 PM
Subject: [runacc] Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…

My memory is somewhat unreliable on this question, since I’m usually
involved in the fashion show somehow.

Is it traditional to have no other program items running during the
Sunday Fashion Show, or has that varied from year to year?

Thanks!

Kevin

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.20/1262 – Release Date: 2/6/2008 9:13 AM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1625 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…

I’m mostly mediating a vehement discussion (it has not become an
argument) between my programming head (who is used to much larger
conventions where they often program against even the Masquerade) and my
FFS director.

Just wanted a sanity check.

Kevin

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> FFS has typically been treated as a “Big Tent” item (like the
> Historical and F&S/F) with no counterprogramming, although I think
> CC22 may have had some Historical track item against it…?
>
> Do you feel a need to do counterprogramming because of time (to fit
> all program items in) or space (because the room for the FFS won’t
> hold all the members of the convention) considerations? Otherwise, I
> would strongly urge you not to counterprogram for the hour or so the
> FFS will take.
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1626 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…
Could you put a clause in the “publications” section that excuses
committees from re-sending publications that are returned to sender?
We’ve had a fair number of pubs get returned because of address
problems.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1627 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…

And by “address problems” Andy means members who give us an invalid
mailing address, or who fail to update their address when they move.

Kevin

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

>
> Could you put a clause in the “publications” section that excuses
> committees from re-sending publications that are returned to sender?
> We’ve had a fair number of pubs get returned because of address
> problems.
>
> andy
>
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1628 From: Dave Doering Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
At CC23, we too made the FFS a “Big Tent” particularly to further
highlight the value of the Folio and those who contribute to it.

There will always be those members who won’t attend the FFS. However,
by not counter-programming the con strongly shows its support for
those in the show.

Dave Doering
CC23:Utah

 

Group: runacc Message: 1629 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…

I think you can just set your own policy. We didn’t have much of a
problem with this, but we kept PRs if they didn’t make it to their
destinations. And we made one attempt to mail the Folios again, in case we
had something wrong. We emailed them. Otherwise, too bad, so sad – pick it
up at registration – if you show up.

Bruce

> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Hey, Karen… in your next Con-Stitution update…
>
> And by “address problems” Andy means members who give us an invalid
> mailing address, or who fail to update their address when they move.
>
> Kevin
>
> Andrew T Trembley wrote:
> >
> > Could you put a clause in the “publications” section that excuses
> > committees from re-sending publications that are returned to sender?
> > We’ve had a fair number of pubs get returned because of address
> > problems.
> >
> > andy
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1630 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…

I would agree with this. After all, it really only is typically 1 hour.

Bruce

> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Dave Doering
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:32 PM
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [runacc] Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…
>
> At CC23, we too made the FFS a “Big Tent” particularly to further
> highlight the value of the Folio and those who contribute to it.
>
> There will always be those members who won’t attend the FFS. However,
> by not counter-programming the con strongly shows its support for
> those in the show.
>
> Dave Doering
> CC23:Utah
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1631 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 2/6/2008
Subject: Re: Question about scheduling at past Costume-Cons…

At 06:57 PM 2/5/2008, you wrote:

>My memory is somewhat unreliable on this question, since I’m usually
>involved in the fashion show somehow.
>
>Is it traditional to have no other program items running during the
>Sunday Fashion Show, or has that varied from year to year?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Kevin

As I recall the three I was involved in chairing didn’t cross program
against the actual show. There was programming until just before showtime.

Pierre

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1632 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 2/9/2008
Subject: Costume magazine
Saw this on the F-Costume list so ordered it. It’s a pretty nice little mag,
glossy but cosplay heavy – $12 bucks. Anybody else checked it out or know
anything about the gal who produces it? The premier copy is only 150 run but
hopefully that will expand if we get the word out.

http://www.costumemakermagazine.com/?q=node/6

Looks like she needs some ads though – might be a good place to advertise in
for future CCs. I’ve written her for info & will pass it along when
received.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 1633 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: CC28 Update
Hello!

I just thought I’d share this with everyone here. Today, the hotel contract
for CC28 was signed.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1634 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

Congratulations! Which hotel? If I knew, I’ve forgotten.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com<mailto:osierhenry@cs.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: [runacc] CC28 Update

Hello!

I just thought I’d share this with everyone here. Today, the hotel contract
for CC28 was signed.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org<http://www.cc28.org/>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1635 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

In a message dated 3/25/2008 7:26:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
bpconnell@verizon.net writes:

> Congratulations! Which hotel? If I knew, I’ve forgotten.
>
>
>
>
>

Its a Hilton in downtown Milwaukee. I know it as the Marc Plaza, but it
started it’s life as the Schroeder.
http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF
It has a lovely old world look to it and is convenient to many museums and
restaurants.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1636 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

Yay, Henry! Good job!

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: [runacc] CC28 Update

Hello!

I just thought I’d share this with everyone here. Today, the hotel contract
for CC28 was signed.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.0/1342 – Release Date: 3/25/2008 10:26 AM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1637 From: Martin Gear Date: 3/25/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

If it is the hotel that I am thinking of, I stayed there several years
ago on business and it was a lovely funky old hotel (in the best sense
of the phrase)
^M^

osierhenry@cs.com wrote:

>
> In a message dated 3/25/2008 7:26:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
> bpconnell@verizon.net <mailto:bpconnell%40verizon.net> writes:
> > Congratulations! Which hotel? If I knew, I’ve forgotten.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Its a Hilton in downtown Milwaukee. I know it as the Marc Plaza, but it
> started it’s life as the Schroeder.
> http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF
> <http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF>
> It has a lovely old world look to it and is convenient to many museums
> and
> restaurants.
>
> Henry
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1638 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

Gee, Henry, it looks like a larger version of the Hotel Fort Des
Moines, where CC24 was! But considering they’re about the same age,
I guess that’s not too surprising….

Sandy

At 07:43 PM 3/25/2008, you wrote:

>In a message dated 3/25/2008 7:26:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
><mailto:bpconnell%40verizon.net>bpconnell@verizon.net writes:
> > Congratulations! Which hotel? If I knew, I’ve forgotten.
>
>Its a Hilton in downtown Milwaukee. I know it as the Marc Plaza, but it
>started it’s life as the Schroeder.
><http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF>http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF
>It has a lovely old world look to it and is convenient to many museums and
>restaurants.
>
>Henry

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1639 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

I see that parking is $22 a night (ouch), what’s the room rate going to be?

Nora

> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> osierhenry@cs.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:44 PM
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [runacc] CC28 Update
>
> In a message dated 3/25/2008 7:26:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
> bpconnell@verizon.net writes:
> > Congratulations! Which hotel? If I knew, I’ve forgotten.

> Its a Hilton in downtown Milwaukee. I know it as the Marc Plaza, but it
> started it’s life as the Schroeder.
> http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/hotels/index.jhtml?ctyhocn=MKEMHHF
> It has a lovely old world look to it and is convenient to many museums and
> restaurants.

 

Group: runacc Message: 1640 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

In a message dated 3/25/2008 10:36:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
MartinGear@comcast.net writes:

> If it is the hotel that I am thinking of, I stayed there several years
> ago on business and it was a lovely funky old hotel (in the best sense
> of the phrase)
>
>
>

5th & Wisconsin, right across the street from the giant conference center
downtown. Three blocks from Milwaukee Public Museum, birth place of the Diorama!

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1641 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/26/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

In a message dated 3/26/2008 6:17:59 AM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> I see that parking is $22 a night (ouch), what’s the room rate going to be?
>
>
>
>
>

Survey says: You are in correct! Parking will be $12! (Its in the contract!)

I forget the room rate right now. Will get back to you.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1642 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 3/27/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

Well, that’s what their website says; glad you could negotiate a lower rate
– an extra $100 or so would knock some people for a loop if they didn’t plan
for it (course you need to make sure everybody knows about it in your PRs,
wouldn’t want someone getting charged the wrong rate by the garage
attendants. Or is it being added directly to the bill?)
Another garage question – any idea on it’s limits? Size, quantity,
what-have-you. You know our propensity for renting a “church” van, and that
wouldn’t fit in the garage at Des Moines.

Nora

> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
>
> In a message dated 3/26/2008 6:17:59 AM Central Daylight Time,
> casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> > I see that parking is $22 a night (ouch), what’s the room rate going to

be?

> >
> >
> Survey says: You are in correct! Parking will be $12! (Its in the

contract!)

>
> I forget the room rate right now. Will get back to you.
>
> Henry

 

Group: runacc Message: 1643 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 3/27/2008
Subject: Re: CC28 Update

In a message dated 3/27/2008 6:19:29 AM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> (course you need to make sure everybody knows about it in your PRs,
> wouldn’t want someone getting charged the wrong rate by the garage
> attendants. Or is it being added directly to the bill?)

Thanks for the idea!

> Another garage question – any idea on it’s limits? Size, quantity,
> what-have-you. You know our propensity for renting a “church” van, and that
> wouldn’t fit in the garage at Des Moines.

I have seen large SUV’s in it, but I will have to find out. I am planning on
having a big van for carting folks around to some shopping sites.

Andy, can you guess where?

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1644 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Last-minute recruiting…
CC26 still needs a house manager for the shows.

What does the house manager do?
1. Work with our hotel department to make sure that the house seating
is correct before each show
2. Ensures the judges’ desk is in position and has enough chairs
3. Manages wheelchair seating areas (if necessary)
4. Manages reserved seating areas (if there are any)
5. When the show director and the crews all agree that everything is
ready in the house, opens the house doors
6. Coordinates line management/entertainment folks (here’s hoping for
no big lines, there are nearly 600 seats in the house)

If you’re not competing and think you can do this, or if you know
someone who is not competing who you could recommend, please email chair@cc26.org

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1645 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…

In a message dated 4/17/2008 6:55:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com writes:

> What does the house manager do?
> 1. Work with our hotel department to make sure that the house seating
> is correct before each show

Combo effort with MD, IMHO.

> 2. Ensures the judges’ desk is in position and has enough chairs

Ditto.

> 3. Manages wheelchair seating areas (if necessary)
> 4. Manages reserved seating areas (if there are any)
> 5. When the show director and the crews all agree that everything is
> ready in the house, opens the house doors
>

Basically, all ditto

> 6. Coordinates line management/entertainment folks (here’s hoping for
> no big lines, there are nearly 600 seats in the house)

You might want to consider a separate person for this. Things can get busy
enough inside before the doors open.

I also would suggest that all Masq Staff know where the fire exits are, as
well as fire extinguishers, and what the medical emergency procedure is, both in
the house and around the stage.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1646 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…

When Andy and I run a masquerade (that’s *2* MDs working together), we
still usually have a front-of house manager.

The difference is in key focus: the MDs are focussed on the contestants
and the show on the stage, the HM is focussed on the audience in the house.

Even with two MDs, we found one MD can wrangle backstage issues, one MD
can deal with on-stage and judging stuff, and the house manager deals
with the house.

This includes watching for security issues, etc (we almost had to bounce
an audience member at ALA 2007 for heckling. I heard it from my vantage
point and could flag the HM and MC to put a stop to it. Having one of
the MDs go wading into the audience would have been a rather
non-effective use of their talents.

Does that help make it make more sense?

Kevin

osierhenry@cs.com wrote:

>
> In a message dated 4/17/2008 6:55:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
> attrembl@bovil.com <mailto:attrembl%40bovil.com> writes:
> > What does the house manager do?
> > 1. Work with our hotel department to make sure that the house seating
> > is correct before each show
>
> Combo effort with MD, IMHO.
>
> > 2. Ensures the judges’ desk is in position and has enough chairs
>
> Ditto.
>
> > 3. Manages wheelchair seating areas (if necessary)
> > 4. Manages reserved seating areas (if there are any)
> > 5. When the show director and the crews all agree that everything is
> > ready in the house, opens the house doors
> >
> Basically, all ditto
>
> > 6. Coordinates line management/entertainment folks (here’s hoping for
> > no big lines, there are nearly 600 seats in the house)
>
> You might want to consider a separate person for this. Things can get
> busy
> enough inside before the doors open.
>
> I also would suggest that all Masq Staff know where the fire exits
> are, as
> well as fire extinguishers, and what the medical emergency procedure
> is, both in
> the house and around the stage.
>
> Henry Osier
> Chief Spy
> Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1647 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…

I’ve been a house manager. The house manager needs a staff of ushers to assist in orderly seating of the audience and, if appropriate, distributing masquerade programs.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com<mailto:osierhenry@cs.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: chair@cc26.org<mailto:chair@cc26.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Last-minute recruiting…

In a message dated 4/17/2008 6:55:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
attrembl@bovil.com<mailto:attrembl@bovil.com> writes:
> What does the house manager do?
> 1. Work with our hotel department to make sure that the house seating
> is correct before each show

Combo effort with MD, IMHO.

> 2. Ensures the judges’ desk is in position and has enough chairs

Ditto.

> 3. Manages wheelchair seating areas (if necessary)
> 4. Manages reserved seating areas (if there are any)
> 5. When the show director and the crews all agree that everything is
> ready in the house, opens the house doors
>
Basically, all ditto

> 6. Coordinates line management/entertainment folks (here’s hoping for
> no big lines, there are nearly 600 seats in the house)

You might want to consider a separate person for this. Things can get busy
enough inside before the doors open.

I also would suggest that all Masq Staff know where the fire exits are, as
well as fire extinguishers, and what the medical emergency procedure is, both in
the house and around the stage.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1648 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/17/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting…

The House Manager should be responsible for seating, navigation,
basically everything in front of the stage, up to and including
hallway crowd management prior to opening the doors.

House managers generally have ushering staff. Considering the number
of people that are expected for CC26, I wouldn’t feel comfortable with
anything less than 6-8 ushers for each of the events. You’ll need them
to help seat people, and if the entrants are walking through the house
instead of back stage again, to help navigate them to fan photo. And
to watch for those pesky flash cameras because some ditz will think
the rule doesn’t apply to him.

If the House Manager’s doing his/her job right, the MD should be free
to work backstage, dealing with entry/judging issues prior to starting
the show and during halftime as well.

I’ve done the job before, but I don’t know about doing it at CC26. If
things are desperate, I may be available for the Historical and/or the
SF/F but not the Fashion Show (which I think you know already)! 9-)

Just please give me plenty of warning if you decide to use me. I was
planning to pack stuff to watch the show that would be completely
inappropriate for managing the house.

Cheers,

Betsy

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:10 PM, <osierhenry@cs.com> wrote:

> In a message dated 4/17/2008 6:55:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
> attrembl@bovil.com writes:
> > What does the house manager do?
> > 1. Work with our hotel department to make sure that the house seating
> > is correct before each show
>
> Combo effort with MD, IMHO.
>
>
> > 2. Ensures the judges’ desk is in position and has enough chairs
>
> Ditto.
>
>
> > 3. Manages wheelchair seating areas (if necessary)
> > 4. Manages reserved seating areas (if there are any)
> > 5. When the show director and the crews all agree that everything is
> > ready in the house, opens the house doors
> >
> Basically, all ditto
>
>
> > 6. Coordinates line management/entertainment folks (here’s hoping for
> > no big lines, there are nearly 600 seats in the house)
>
> You might want to consider a separate person for this. Things can get busy
> enough inside before the doors open.
>
> I also would suggest that all Masq Staff know where the fire exits are, as
> well as fire extinguishers, and what the medical emergency procedure is,
> both in
> the house and around the stage.
>
> Henry Osier
> Chief Spy
> Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1649 From: Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention Ch Date: 4/21/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting… house manager found
Thanks to everyone who offered their services as House Manager for CC26!

Tadao Tomomatsu (sp?), who is quite familiar with the Doubletree and
with our usual gang of suspects working tech and crew has stepped
forward and volunteered.

He also has no other responsibilities at CC26 (he thought he’d get away
with being a tourist… ha!) which also simplifies things.

Thanks again for your support. See many of you in a couple days!

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 1650 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/30/2008
Subject: Re: Last-minute recruiting… house manager found

In a message dated 4/21/2008 6:08:53 PM Central Daylight Time, chair@cc26.org
writes:

> Tadao Tomomatsu (sp?), who is quite familiar with the Doubletree and
> with our usual gang of suspects working tech and crew has stepped
> forward and volunteered.

Where did you find him? He was a super fun guy!

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 32 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 32 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 1551 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/25/2007
Subject: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 1552 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/25/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – Friday stuff
Group: runacc Message: 1553 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 5/26/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 1554 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 1555 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – CC promotion
Group: runacc Message: 1556 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: CC25 Brain Dump: Dealers rep report
Group: runacc Message: 1557 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – Programming part I
Group: runacc Message: 1558 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Brain dump – Programming part II
Group: runacc Message: 1559 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 1560 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Group: runacc Message: 1561 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II
Group: runacc Message: 1562 From: Tina Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brats
Group: runacc Message: 1563 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II
Group: runacc Message: 1564 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brats
Group: runacc Message: 1565 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II
Group: runacc Message: 1566 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/30/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II
Group: runacc Message: 1567 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/1/2007
Subject: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards
Group: runacc Message: 1568 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/1/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards
Group: runacc Message: 1569 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/2/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards
Group: runacc Message: 1570 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/2/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards
Group: runacc Message: 1571 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 1572 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: Brain Dump – Green Room notes
Group: runacc Message: 1573 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: Brain dump – masquerades
Group: runacc Message: 1574 From: bruno Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 1575 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion
Group: runacc Message: 1576 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes
Group: runacc Message: 1577 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes
Group: runacc Message: 1578 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades
Group: runacc Message: 1579 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/8/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades
Group: runacc Message: 1580 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades
Group: runacc Message: 1581 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/11/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes
Group: runacc Message: 1582 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/11/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes
Group: runacc Message: 1583 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: More (general) Promotion…
Group: runacc Message: 1584 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes
Group: runacc Message: 1585 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: Re: More (general) Promotion…
Group: runacc Message: 1586 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 6/13/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes
Group: runacc Message: 1587 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1588 From: Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention C Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1589 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1590 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1591 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1592 From: Marty Gear Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1593 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/17/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1594 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/17/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1595 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/18/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1596 From: Martin Gear Date: 6/19/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1597 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/20/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1598 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 6/21/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
Group: runacc Message: 1599 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: What’s wrong with this webpage?
Group: runacc Message: 1600 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 1551 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/25/2007
Subject: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
Hospitality notes:

Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated figure of 275 attendees, but he bought one for every person he thought would be there. First of all, we thought we’d be lucky to have 235 actual on-site members over the entire weekend. But we only had maybe 1/3 of that number on Friday. I would recommend on any given night with real food, 50% of the estimated total for one day is still probably too many, but that’s just me. My philosophy is that it’s better to run out, rather than be stuck with a lot of wasted food.

Our Hostess, Genie Hillen, had these notes:

She was more careful not to overbuy on supplies – at CC16, we had a lot of soda leftover, among other things. Fortunately, she was able to take some of it back to where she bought it, that time.

People appreciated having bottled water in the Suite, even though the hotel had water stations set up in the Concourse. Having real protein instead of just sugar and salty snacks was a hit (toasted ravioli). We served them a lot over the weekend, and we apparently still had too many.

Large plastic glasses for drinks were unnecessary – everyone just drank from their cans.

Although we’re certainly not advocating feeding the entire con, there’s something to be said with providing at least some breakfast-y kinds of things for staffers to run in and eat. It saved a lot of time not having to go somewhere outside the hotel.

We wound up donating a bunch of leftover food to a local convention’s Hospitality Suite a couple of weeks after CC. Good thing, too – they apparently didn’t have much. It probably bought the Guild some good PR, and they acknowledged the donation during their opening ceremonies.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1552 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/25/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – Friday stuff
ICG meeting

Once again, having the ICG meeting on Friday is much better than on Monday. We heartily recommend that future concoms continue to schedule it on that day.

=================

Friday Night Social Notes:

There was some disagreement, but an interesting observation was made by someone on the D list about the abundance of tables and chairs in the ballroom. Having so many of them may’ve contributed to newbie “wallflowers”: not knowing anyone, they sort of sat in one place didn’t mix as much. People who are sitting down may seem less approachable.

Perhaps a few less tables and/or chairs might have been a good idea. At least that way, more people would have had to share a table.

Everybody always has this thing about having to have chocolate, but it was cheesecake people made for first. “Buy about 20 – 30 more desserts than you think you need”.

It goes without saying that music adds to the atmosphere of the FNS. I tried to appeal to the different generations of costumers present. A dance can work if the music is right, without much “dead air” in between. The music I mixed seemed to work, but since it was just playing off a CD, there were 2-3 seconds of nothing between cuts.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1553 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 5/26/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:48:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but
> he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated
> figure of 275 attendees,

Actually, I figured 250. With one brat per person, that would have worked out
perfect.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1554 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

It would have been easier on your pocket book if you’d checked with us for what our current count was before the con – I don’t think we’d even broken 200 when you were about to make your buy.

As for one brat per attendee – unless yoou’d plannned to server those all weekend, (not something you mentioned), not all 200+ attendees were going to be there on Friday. They never are.

Bruce

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:48:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but
> he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated
> figure of 275 attendees,
Actually, I figured 250. With one brat per person, that would have worked out
perfect.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1555 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – CC promotion
Promotion

We had a number of giveaways as tools for con promotion: Wooden coins with the con logo and the website – redeemable for a prize at the con was the first idea. The hand fans and hall awards for other conventions were some others. I even produced a promotional VCD to hand out to interested parties. How effective any of them actually were at bringing in people, I can’t say. I think they were pretty cool, and they certainly made impressions as far as good will is concerned, but given how small the con was, I have my doubts about any actual impact they made. Oh, and we did have flyers distributed at other cons.

(Note: The VCD featured a music video of past CC performances, plus some clips of some representative presentations, followed by contact info about CC25. I would be happy to produce a more generic VCD that concoms can copy and give to anyone who might be interested. They play on most DVD players, but they were intended to be viewed on a computer.)

Giving away free memberships at cons with a hotbed of costuming activity is, on the whole, a good promotional tool. We found it helped by bringing in more room nights, because some winners had to bring their family along. So, I don’t know that giving away large numbers of memberships is necessarily advantageous – other than maybe pumping up your on-site numbers. You also should keep in mind that if you’re giving away memberships, you’re supposedly giving them Progress Reports, Program Books, goodie bag schwag, etc. And if your freebies don’t show up for the con, you’re on the hook for the postage to mail all that stuff to them – unless you choose not to, but that would seem sort of poopy.

Our best promotional tool would undoubtedly be the CC25 website. I don’t think anyone can argue that it was the most thorough website to date. Nora tried to anticipate every question people might ask and had a page for just about every topic – and created new ones within a week or so if necessary. She provided a site map so that people could find info by topic. Of coure, there were still people too lazy to actually look for some things and asked anyway. They were then directed to that page. And then there were some who people asked for answers not pertaining to the con that could be found by spending less than 2 minutes doing a Google search. Seriously.

Obviously, the D list is still the prime venue for getting news out there. I would say, though, that, despite putting your info on your website and the D list and everywhere else, expect people to still ask questions because somehow, they managed not to pay attention. Some people are so clueless that they practically need a verbal mallet between the eyes.

I’m very proud of the fact that we had at least a tentative schedule of panels posted well in advance of the con. This not only gave an idea to people of what to expect, but built anticipation of the event. Buzz is good. If you can get that info out there, it might bring in initially casual browsers. So get your programmer to work with your website person, if you can.

Nora actively sought out content from Staff, sometimes providing it herself (or having me write it) when certain people couldn’t seem to provide anything on a timely basis. A few staff didn’t seem to understand that it is good to come up with something new and/or different from the Progress Reports and vice versa, even if you’re just re-writing the same info.

As we’ve acknowledged on the list, we need to reach out to the anime community and get them interested in coming to the con. A number of us did just that, by joining one of the biggest cosplay sites, www.cosplay.com. I think it’s worth it for some representative of each con (and bids, for that matter), to be on the forums, to communicate with these people. I can’t say for certain that it benefited us to any great degree – traffic on the CC25 forum topics was fairly light. But that could just be in our case. I would think CC26 might actually have a bigger audience, since they’re bound to have more cosplayers in their market, anyway. The same is potentially true for the East Coast cons. With those people being younger, and probably fewer sources, this slice of the CC demographic will be even less likely to travel beyond their own region. Of course, I say this while recognizing that we had the potential of bringing down people from the Chicago/Anime Central area, but that didn’t happen. So, your mileage may vary.

We made a good first impression on all our visiting cosplayers, and several of them are fairly influential in their own circles. They’d already been spreading the word about the ICG, and now they’ll spread the word on CC. If we (the costuming community) want to be able to tap into this large market, future concoms need to make sure they have someone on staff who’s willing to do the legwork to communicate via the cosplay forums. >This is vital.< And CC26, if it manages to bring in more cosplayers than we did, will be ground zero for making the best impression on the most cosplayers in the near future. Everyone will need to be as “in your face” friendly as possible. That’s what we did, and it paid off.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1556 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: CC25 Brain Dump: Dealers rep report
Do not wait for inquiries to come to you – seek dealers out. Keep in touch with prospects if you’ve done this before. By repeatedly contacting potential dealers who were interested (but not yet buying tables) and iff-ish (interested, but non-committal), she finally got commitments from most of the ones she wanted. And she got a firm “No” for others, so she could stop pursuing them. Ramona said, “Even though it’s tempting to blow off dealer prospects who don’t say ‘Yes” or ‘No’ right away, keep following up with them. They’re more inclined to sign with someone who takes the time to communicate with them than someone who doesn’t.”

Be prepared for not having many dealers signing up until maybe 6 months or less before the con. And expect a number of literally last minute inquiries.

We were hurt some when Janet could not come, and Poison Press had to back out, but the dealers room seemed to be of interest, if a bit small. We would have liked to have had more variety, but the quality of a dealers room is always at the mercy of the economy and who’s willing to come.

Have at least one “”to die for” dealer. Apparently the trim guy, who happens to be local for us, was a hit.

Ramona said, “Ensure that dealers get food and drink regularly, if available” (I don’t think that means the con should feed them, though).

Having coffee setups for the dealers was apparently appreciated.

The dealers liked the fact that the room opened and closed on time. Apparently, this is rare, much to our surprise.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1557 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – Programming part I
A lot of notes here. Take away from it what you will.

Overall, our attendees seemed pleased with what we offered, considering that Pierre and I had to scramble when our original Programming person had to back out due to projected finances at the time (however, that person came to the con, after all).

Either I’m getting jaded or I’ve just not been as interested in a significant percentage of panels that have been scheduled in the last decade or so of CCs. Granted, some of the problem probably came from cons having to use whatever people are willing to volunteer to do. If my experience is the norm, then don’t rely on volunteering – go out and find the people, come up with your own ideas. And – get started a lot sooner than Pierre and I were able to do.

So, since I had the opportunity, we tried to schedule topics I know that I’d want to see, suggestions off the D list, and mixed in the old standards that folks always shows up for (wings, armor, embroidery, etc), as well as panels volunteered. In an attempt to draw the anime costumers again (like at CC24), we set aside an entire track dedicated to that group that would also have crossover appeal to others. This was a pretty successful endeavor – all of our panels of this type were very well attended, and not just by the anime crowd. However, I do have a few notes I want to pass on to the list that folks should be aware of.

The most important recommendation I have is to make sure you have someone in the cosplay community, or knows it well enough, to set up or make panels those people would like. I know this won’t be a problem for CC26, but I don’t know about the others. Neither Pierre nor I had the contacts necessary, so we enlisted Aurora Celeste to program our anime track. What she did get for us was very good – however, we had a few issues, and I don’t know if this is representative or not – you be the judge.

First – possibly not her fault – the speaker list for those various panels kept changing. She probably got a lot of interest in coming to the con, but we noticed that many of the names she submitted for panelists either never registered or waited until they arrived at the con. This was frustrating for us from a scheduling standpoint. More concerning to was that she suddenly disappeared off the radar closer to the con and did not answer emails. This left Pierre and me at loose ends, not knowing how much anime programming we were going to have. Not sure what happened there and I didn’t question her about it at the con. Not having a full track turned out to be a boon, though, as we were tight on space for some panels that had to be scheduled according to some speaker availability. So, our satisfaction with Ms. Celeste is a mixed bag. Should you enlist her help, keep this in mind.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1558 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Brain dump – Programming part II
I should note first that it was not an effort just by Pierre and me – Nora and Sherril and Sandy were big helps in getting most of the schedule conflicts resolved by working with a spreadsheet. Having a team do Programming made the work a lot easier.

Panels that worked:

Sheila Lenkman’s garment construction panels were practically SRO, and people would have liked to have seen even more. Marvin Moehle’s panels on Folk costume were found to be very interesting to a small sub-set of costumers.

Many people in Robin Netherton’s panels on Saturday said they loved the info they got from them. Robin had proposed a financial deal to us that made it affordable for her to come to the con and speak, based on her projected draw for her lectures and how it might benefit CC25. To her credit she got out there and promote the convention in her circles. I will tell you, though, that Robin did not draw as many people as she believed she would. So, I cannot in good faith say she was entirely worth the deal we made for her services. Nora will give you the numbers soon.

Other panels that worked very well: Embroidery, Wings (duh), the anime-related panels, Pierre’s judging panel.

The after-masquerade Show and Tell panels were hits as well. We stole this directly from Sheila at Archon. The main thing there is that they have to be tightly moderated so people don’t drone on and on about their costumes.

If anyone’s interested, I can probably find out what panels were only moderately successful.

Panels that didn’t work for whatever reason: “Meet Our Free Membership Winners”, the NASFic info panel, the “Costuming as Performance Art” panel, and the Archives panel. I think these were just too specific and didn’t have enough appeal to a wide audience.

Our cancellations were few, and pretty much before the con even started, so we could adjust accrodingly.

Since one of the main points of the convention is to share knowledge, I tried to follow up on suggestions that more handouts should be available. Pierre can probably speak more on this, as to how successful we were in this endeavor – he was collecting any printed matter panelists were giving out. We had a few inquiries (and one demand) about printing up those handouts. Maybe it’s just me, but I didn’t think the con should have to pay for them. Maybe I’m being cheap – I dunno.

We had a few requests for a digital projector and a laptop in order for panelists to do their presentation. I thought this was ridiculous to expect a con to pay these rentals – printed matter would work just as well. As it happened, Pierre happened to have a digital projector, and I think Aurora or a friend came up with a laptop. But I expect future concoms will get similar requests for accomodation. We also got a request to provide dye buckets and tarps for the fabric dying workshop, by the way.

To avoid unrealistic expectations of what a con will provide, perhaps the Programming Staff needs to set a policy up front, so they don’t get surprised after panels have been scheduled.

One thing we’ve heard from younger con-goers is that they’d like to see more demos and workshops. They’re not as interested in “talking head” lectures – that’s why they also want handouts. I can see their point – you can forget a lot, but if you have handouts, or can actually see a technique, it’s going to stay in memory. Looking back, past cons are usually heavy on lectures, mainly because demos and workshops can be time and convenience problems.

Taking a note from the anime cons, we experimented with encouraging free-form “meetups” of special interest groups. The few we had were reasonably successful, but heavily dependent on the interest. We just had a white board where people could write messages to organize a meet-up and let them sort it out themselves.

I took it as a compliment that we had too many good panels for people to see them all. That having been said, though, I think reprising some very popular panels during the weekend might be worth exploring, if you can talk the panelists into it. This would allow attendees to catch what they missed, and you have one less idea you may have to come up with for a panel.

I, for one, am not in favor of lunch breaks, necessarily, except maybe on Sunday.

There was some discussion on the D list about keeping people on time with their panels. My assumption has been that most people have been considerate, but if this is changing somehow, then maybe the Programmer does need to give each panel a 5 minute warning to wrap up. I don’t think that making panels 45 minutes long is the answer, nor weird time lengths like an hour and 15 minutes. Maybe the key is just to make sure there is a strong moderator for each panel, but you can’t always rely on that. Just my opinion.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1559 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

And, may I add, not everyone likes brats…

A safer bet might have been half that number at least, with a promise to
run out to the store if needed for more.

I know I never got one. Neither (to my knowledge) did Dan or the girls.

Sorry!

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> It would have been easier on your pocket book if you’d checked with us for what our current count was before the con – I don’t think we’d even broken 200 when you were about to make your buy.
>
> As for one brat per attendee – unless yoou’d plannned to server those all weekend, (not something you mentioned), not all 200+ attendees were going to be there on Friday. They never are.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> Bruce
> —– Original Message —–
> From: osierhenry@cs.com
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 8:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality
>
>
> In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:48:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
> casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> > Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but
> > he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated
> > figure of 275 attendees,
> Actually, I figured 250. With one brat per person, that would have worked out
> perfect.
>
> Henry
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1560 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

In a message dated 5/27/2007 4:18:57 PM Central Daylight Time,
bdelaney@hawkeswood.com writes:

> And, may I add, not everyone likes brats…
>

Bratwurst are VERY Milwaukee, though. Thanks to our large German population.

> A safer bet might have been half that number at least, with a promise to
> run out to the store if needed for more.
>

Those were not your run of the mill average grocery store brats. Those were
made by a small butcher shop here in town, were precooked and nitrate free.
They cost me a dollar each, by the way.

> I know I never got one. Neither (to my knowledge) did Dan or the girls.
>

I’m sorry to here that! Are you coming in for Archon/NASFIC by chance?

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1561 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II

[The following is my own personal opinion, subject to change with good,
reasoned conversation. Your mileage may vary. Taxes, tags and licensing
extra. Et cetera and so forth…]

I’m taking most of the points in this message as presented, but the one
below, I think, may deserve a little more exploration.

First, I’ve always been told I was responsible for making my own
handouts. That sort of information should be included in the invitation
from the con to the program participant. Invitations should be in
writing (email or snail), so that everything is spelled out clearly.

It makes sense to me that the program head should be responsible for
identifying panels, populating the panels, ensuring those participants
are notified and confirmed, collecting bios, and then making sure the
panels are going on as expected during the con. It’s a very intense job,
especially with coordinating all the schedules, materials needed, and
last minute issues.

Unfortunately, there are panelists who don’t pay attention to time, even
under the best of circumstances. I think it’s a good idea to have a
timekeeper who’s available to give the high sign that wrap up is
necessary because time’s almost up.

I think that no matter how good the moderator is (if, indeed, he/she has
a watch at all), when a panel gets going and intense, it’s very hard to
remember to check the time all the time. I’m easily distracted and I
sometimes wander all over the map in conversation. I’m not the only one.

What I noted in re the only panel I was on: not one of us on the panel
knew who the moderator was. As a result, it was hard for us to know
precisely what our topic meant or how we should approach it. One of us
ran off into technical specs so detailed she made the group as a whole
glaze over. Without a moderator, we had no way of getting back on
whatever track we thought we might be on.

As a panelist, I like to have a clear understanding of what I’m
presenting. Cool titles may make the panel sound interesting to the
listener, but if the giver isn’t sure what’s supposed to happen, chaos
might ensue, which may not give anyone either a clear understanding of
the topic or any sense of confidence in the information being shared.

I know (now) that there were issues with the programming. Not having a
continuity between each con com sometimes serves to keep the possible
pitfalls from being passed on. I’m glad this list exists for the purpose
of dumping data post-con, so that others might learn and take heed if
necessary.

And one more thing, not related to the above: I think Show and Tell
panels ought to be mandatory. I *ALWAYS* learn stuff I didn’t know about
when I attend them, and you never know what will show up.

Post masquerade wrap-ups also ought to be mandatory, and they should
include the tech crew as well as the MD and judges.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> There was some discussion on the D list about keeping people on time with their panels. My assumption has been that most people have been considerate, but if this is changing somehow, then maybe the Programmer does need to give each panel a 5 minute warning to wrap up. I don’t think that making panels 45 minutes long is the answer, nor weird time lengths like an hour and 15 minutes. Maybe the key is just to make sure there is a strong moderator for each panel, but you can’t always rely on that. Just my opinion.



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1562 From: Tina Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brats

Unfortunately, Henry, brats are not to everyone’s taste (not to mention the heartburn afterwards!). I had one, and I can vouch for the heartburn.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com<mailto:osierhenry@cs.com>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:48:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but
> he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated
> figure of 275 attendees,
Actually, I figured 250. With one brat per person, that would have worked out
perfect.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1563 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II

Giving the panel a five-minute warning is a good thing, not a bad thing. When I have been a panel moderator, I have greatly appreciated a five-minute working, both because I may have lost track of the time and because I could use it to cut off further questions or discussion.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: [runacc] Brain dump – Programming part II

I should note first that it was not an effort just by Pierre and me – Nora and Sherril and Sandy were big helps in getting most of the schedule conflicts resolved by working with a spreadsheet. Having a team do Programming made the work a lot easier.

Panels that worked:

Sheila Lenkman’s garment construction panels were practically SRO, and people would have liked to have seen even more. Marvin Moehle’s panels on Folk costume were found to be very interesting to a small sub-set of costumers.

Many people in Robin Netherton’s panels on Saturday said they loved the info they got from them. Robin had proposed a financial deal to us that made it affordable for her to come to the con and speak, based on her projected draw for her lectures and how it might benefit CC25. To her credit she got out there and promote the convention in her circles. I will tell you, though, that Robin did not draw as many people as she believed she would. So, I cannot in good faith say she was entirely worth the deal we made for her services. Nora will give you the numbers soon.

Other panels that worked very well: Embroidery, Wings (duh), the anime-related panels, Pierre’s judging panel.

The after-masquerade Show and Tell panels were hits as well. We stole this directly from Sheila at Archon. The main thing there is that they have to be tightly moderated so people don’t drone on and on about their costumes.

If anyone’s interested, I can probably find out what panels were only moderately successful.

Panels that didn’t work for whatever reason: “Meet Our Free Membership Winners”, the NASFic info panel, the “Costuming as Performance Art” panel, and the Archives panel. I think these were just too specific and didn’t have enough appeal to a wide audience.

Our cancellations were few, and pretty much before the con even started, so we could adjust accrodingly.

Since one of the main points of the convention is to share knowledge, I tried to follow up on suggestions that more handouts should be available. Pierre can probably speak more on this, as to how successful we were in this endeavor – he was collecting any printed matter panelists were giving out. We had a few inquiries (and one demand) about printing up those handouts. Maybe it’s just me, but I didn’t think the con should have to pay for them. Maybe I’m being cheap – I dunno.

We had a few requests for a digital projector and a laptop in order for panelists to do their presentation. I thought this was ridiculous to expect a con to pay these rentals – printed matter would work just as well. As it happened, Pierre happened to have a digital projector, and I think Aurora or a friend came up with a laptop. But I expect future concoms will get similar requests for accomodation. We also got a request to provide dye buckets and tarps for the fabric dying workshop, by the way.

To avoid unrealistic expectations of what a con will provide, perhaps the Programming Staff needs to set a policy up front, so they don’t get surprised after panels have been scheduled.

One thing we’ve heard from younger con-goers is that they’d like to see more demos and workshops. They’re not as interested in “talking head” lectures – that’s why they also want handouts. I can see their point – you can forget a lot, but if you have handouts, or can actually see a technique, it’s going to stay in memory. Looking back, past cons are usually heavy on lectures, mainly because demos and workshops can be time and convenience problems.

Taking a note from the anime cons, we experimented with encouraging free-form “meetups” of special interest groups. The few we had were reasonably successful, but heavily dependent on the interest. We just had a white board where people could write messages to organize a meet-up and let them sort it out themselves.

I took it as a compliment that we had too many good panels for people to see them all. That having been said, though, I think reprising some very popular panels during the weekend might be worth exploring, if you can talk the panelists into it. This would allow attendees to catch what they missed, and you have one less idea you may have to come up with for a panel.

I, for one, am not in favor of lunch breaks, necessarily, except maybe on Sunday.

There was some discussion on the D list about keeping people on time with their panels. My assumption has been that most people have been considerate, but if this is changing somehow, then maybe the Programmer does need to give each panel a 5 minute warning to wrap up. I don’t think that making panels 45 minutes long is the answer, nor weird time lengths like an hour and 15 minutes. Maybe the key is just to make sure there is a strong moderator for each panel, but you can’t always rely on that. Just my opinion.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1564 From: Byron Connell Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Brats

On the other d/i/g/e/s/t/i/v/e track, I had two and enjoyed them both! However, I liked the ravs best of all!

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Tina<mailto:connell-t1@verizon.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Brats

Unfortunately, Henry, brats are not to everyone’s taste (not to mention the heartburn afterwards!). I had one, and I can vouch for the heartburn.

Tina

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com<mailto:osierhenry@cs.com><mailto:osierhenry@cs.com<mailto:osierhenry@cs.com>>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com><mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Brain Dump: Hospitality

In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:48:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net<mailto:casamai%40sbcglobal.net><mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net<mailto:casamai%40sbcglobal.net>> writes:
> Henry, bless his heart, sponsored the Suite luncheon, which was nice, but
> he overbought the brats by a huge margin. Not sure where he got an estimated
> figure of 275 attendees,
Actually, I figured 250. With one brat per person, that would have worked out
perfect.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1565 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/27/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II

I’ll agree, Pierre and I probably didn’t give much thought to the whole moderator issue. We’re used to a more free-form panel, but maybe that doesn’t work so well in a CC environment.

Re: your comments on handouts – I thought Pierre was asking panelists to bring them along, since he was the point-man on contacts. HOpefully, he can confirm this was done. I also left descriptions of said what we wanted from panels up to him as well. I’ll let him comment on that.

Another good thing about the show ‘n’ tells is that they’re an opportunity for feedback in a relaxed atmosphere. Having one’s peers gushing over something they liked is sometimes more satisfying than the audience reaction.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Brain dump – Programming part II

[The following is my own personal opinion, subject to change with good,
reasoned conversation. Your mileage may vary. Taxes, tags and licensing
extra. Et cetera and so forth…]

I’m taking most of the points in this message as presented, but the one
below, I think, may deserve a little more exploration.

First, I’ve always been told I was responsible for making my own
handouts. That sort of information should be included in the invitation
from the con to the program participant. Invitations should be in
writing (email or snail), so that everything is spelled out clearly.

It makes sense to me that the program head should be responsible for
identifying panels, populating the panels, ensuring those participants
are notified and confirmed, collecting bios, and then making sure the
panels are going on as expected during the con. It’s a very intense job,
especially with coordinating all the schedules, materials needed, and
last minute issues.

Unfortunately, there are panelists who don’t pay attention to time, even
under the best of circumstances. I think it’s a good idea to have a
timekeeper who’s available to give the high sign that wrap up is
necessary because time’s almost up.

I think that no matter how good the moderator is (if, indeed, he/she has
a watch at all), when a panel gets going and intense, it’s very hard to
remember to check the time all the time. I’m easily distracted and I
sometimes wander all over the map in conversation. I’m not the only one.

What I noted in re the only panel I was on: not one of us on the panel
knew who the moderator was. As a result, it was hard for us to know
precisely what our topic meant or how we should approach it. One of us
ran off into technical specs so detailed she made the group as a whole
glaze over. Without a moderator, we had no way of getting back on
whatever track we thought we might be on.

As a panelist, I like to have a clear understanding of what I’m
presenting. Cool titles may make the panel sound interesting to the
listener, but if the giver isn’t sure what’s supposed to happen, chaos
might ensue, which may not give anyone either a clear understanding of
the topic or any sense of confidence in the information being shared.

I know (now) that there were issues with the programming. Not having a
continuity between each con com sometimes serves to keep the possible
pitfalls from being passed on. I’m glad this list exists for the purpose
of dumping data post-con, so that others might learn and take heed if
necessary.

And one more thing, not related to the above: I think Show and Tell
panels ought to be mandatory. I *ALWAYS* learn stuff I didn’t know about
when I attend them, and you never know what will show up.

Post masquerade wrap-ups also ought to be mandatory, and they should
include the tech crew as well as the MD and judges.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> There was some discussion on the D list about keeping people on time with their panels. My assumption has been that most people have been considerate, but if this is changing somehow, then maybe the Programmer does need to give each panel a 5 minute warning to wrap up. I don’t think that making panels 45 minutes long is the answer, nor weird time lengths like an hour and 15 minutes. Maybe the key is just to make sure there is a strong moderator for each panel, but you can’t always rely on that. Just my opinion.



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1566 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 5/30/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Programming part II

At 10:40 PM 5/27/2007, you wrote:

>I’ll agree, Pierre and I probably didn’t give much thought to the
>whole moderator issue. We’re used to a more free-form panel, but
>maybe that doesn’t work so well in a CC environment.
>
>Re: your comments on handouts – I thought Pierre was asking
>panelists to bring them along, since he was the point-man on
>contacts. HOpefully, he can confirm this was done. I also left
>descriptions of said what we wanted from panels up to him as well.
>I’ll let him comment on that.

I did, though I didn’t explicitly say each panelist was responsible
for making their own handouts. I think I got most of the ones
available, though I haven’t had time to sort through them.

Pierre

>Another good thing about the show ‘n’ tells is that they’re an
>opportunity for feedback in a relaxed atmosphere. Having one’s peers
>gushing over something they liked is sometimes more satisfying than
>the audience reaction.
>
>Bruce
>
>—– Original Message —–
>From: Betsy Delaney
>To: <mailto:runacc%40yahoogroups.com>runacc@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 5:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [runacc] Brain dump – Programming part II
>
>[The following is my own personal opinion, subject to change with good,
>reasoned conversation. Your mileage may vary. Taxes, tags and licensing
>extra. Et cetera and so forth…]
>
>I’m taking most of the points in this message as presented, but the one
>below, I think, may deserve a little more exploration.
>
>First, I’ve always been told I was responsible for making my own
>handouts. That sort of information should be included in the invitation
>from the con to the program participant. Invitations should be in
>writing (email or snail), so that everything is spelled out clearly.
>
>It makes sense to me that the program head should be responsible for
>identifying panels, populating the panels, ensuring those participants
>are notified and confirmed, collecting bios, and then making sure the
>panels are going on as expected during the con. It’s a very intense job,
>especially with coordinating all the schedules, materials needed, and
>last minute issues.
>
>Unfortunately, there are panelists who don’t pay attention to time, even
>under the best of circumstances. I think it’s a good idea to have a
>timekeeper who’s available to give the high sign that wrap up is
>necessary because time’s almost up.
>
>I think that no matter how good the moderator is (if, indeed, he/she has
>a watch at all), when a panel gets going and intense, it’s very hard to
>remember to check the time all the time. I’m easily distracted and I
>sometimes wander all over the map in conversation. I’m not the only one.
>
>What I noted in re the only panel I was on: not one of us on the panel
>knew who the moderator was. As a result, it was hard for us to know
>precisely what our topic meant or how we should approach it. One of us
>ran off into technical specs so detailed she made the group as a whole
>glaze over. Without a moderator, we had no way of getting back on
>whatever track we thought we might be on.
>
>As a panelist, I like to have a clear understanding of what I’m
>presenting. Cool titles may make the panel sound interesting to the
>listener, but if the giver isn’t sure what’s supposed to happen, chaos
>might ensue, which may not give anyone either a clear understanding of
>the topic or any sense of confidence in the information being shared.
>
>I know (now) that there were issues with the programming. Not having a
>continuity between each con com sometimes serves to keep the possible
>pitfalls from being passed on. I’m glad this list exists for the purpose
>of dumping data post-con, so that others might learn and take heed if
>necessary.
>
>And one more thing, not related to the above: I think Show and Tell
>panels ought to be mandatory. I *ALWAYS* learn stuff I didn’t know about
>when I attend them, and you never know what will show up.
>
>Post masquerade wrap-ups also ought to be mandatory, and they should
>include the tech crew as well as the MD and judges.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Betsy
>
>Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
>
> > There was some discussion on the D list about keeping people on
> time with their panels. My assumption has been that most people
> have been considerate, but if this is changing somehow, then maybe
> the Programmer does need to give each panel a 5 minute warning to
> wrap up. I don’t think that making panels 45 minutes long is the
> answer, nor weird time lengths like an hour and 15 minutes. Maybe
> the key is just to make sure there is a strong moderator for each
> panel, but you can’t always rely on that. Just my opinion.
>
>–
>–
>Betsy Delaney

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1567 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/1/2007
Subject: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards
We wanted a lot of Hall Costumes at CC 25 & we got them!
In addition to the general awards throughout the weekend we promoted
two special themed hall award competitions which apparently got
peoples’ attention. All special costumes were also eligible for the
general awards which I think surprised people.
I sponsored the Saturday Pirate Hall Costume contest and we had dozens
of pirates of every kind! It was very successful.
The Sunday “Orange” competition was sponsored by Larry & Ramona and
was also very well received. Honestly I wasn’t sure how people would
react to that one but there were a number of participants; it was
pretty amusing.

Conclusion: I think people enjoyed having a theme to aim at. I’m sure
it made for more hall costumes than we might have had.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 1568 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/1/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards

Heck – my pirate hall costume was the *only* costume I presented that
weekend that was anywhere near finished, besides Katie’s SF/F entry.

Erin found an orange top at Once Upon a Child that fit her – she decided
not to wear her orange dress as a result!

I did get a group shot of about a dozen orange hall costume entries, but
I haven’t had the time to upload any of the photos I took. If I get a
bit of time in the next several weeks, I’ll get them up and send a pointer.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I sponsored the Saturday Pirate Hall Costume contest and we had dozens
> of pirates of every kind! It was very successful.

> The Sunday “Orange” competition was sponsored by Larry & Ramona and
> was also very well received. Honestly I wasn’t sure how people would
> react to that one but there were a number of participants; it was
> pretty amusing.

> Nora



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1569 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/2/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards

Or maybe load them to the new galleries for the ICG? They’re getting close to ready & it’d be great to have something besides our stuff when it goes live.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: Betsy Delaney
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards

Heck – my pirate hall costume was the *only* costume I presented that
weekend that was anywhere near finished, besides Katie’s SF/F entry.

Erin found an orange top at Once Upon a Child that fit her – she decided
not to wear her orange dress as a result!

I did get a group shot of about a dozen orange hall costume entries, but
I haven’t had the time to upload any of the photos I took. If I get a
bit of time in the next several weeks, I’ll get them up and send a pointer.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> I sponsored the Saturday Pirate Hall Costume contest and we had dozens
> of pirates of every kind! It was very successful.

> The Sunday “Orange” competition was sponsored by Larry & Ramona and
> was also very well received. Honestly I wasn’t sure how people would
> react to that one but there were a number of participants; it was
> pretty amusing.

> Nora



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1570 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/2/2007
Subject: Re: CC25 Commentary – themed hall awards

Entirely possible. It’s a good thought!

I mentioned to Karen that she might consider making a “fan” space for CC
photos, but it was in passing without any real details.

I mean to finish the last of the work this weekend. If I’m really lucky,
I’ll get it all done this afternoon. After that? Dunno.

Cheers,

Betsy

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Or maybe load them to the new galleries for the ICG? They’re getting close to ready & it’d be great to have something besides our stuff when it goes live.
>
> Nora



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1571 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion
Promotion – ICG

I think the Guild could benefit from a strong promotion presence at CC. I’m not sure what form that should take – having a traveling road show of the Archives might be one idea. On a local level, at CC16, our “Jeff Table”, which was the SLCG merchandise, welcome wagon and other function table, worked quite well – this time, it was not successful. No memberships were sold, nor was there very much merchandise sold. Either things have changed, or we failed in getting people’s attention.

In any case, the problem always is you have to have people willing to do the work.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1572 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: Brain Dump – Green Room notes
Surprisingly, people seemed to like the fact that we had three separate green rooms. Our GR chief had thought it was a bad idea, until we gave her the feedback. Two different perspectives: from a logistics standpoint, it might have made it harder for her, but contestants loved it.

She chose not to have any protein among the backstage snacks, on her own assertions that she would not want “greasy foods” near her costumes. While I understand her thinking, I don’t agree with that decision, as we had some people wanting something other than sugar (I can’t remember, but I think we were light on vegetable matter, due to the hotel catering costs).

No one seemed to mind that there was not backstage feed.

Having the photographer in his own room, rather than sharing with one of the Green Rooms, worked very well.

The notes below came directly from our head of the Green Room in her own words.

More than a year before the convention, when no one else would
volunteer for the job, I decided that I could probably handle it, and
used CC24 and Archon to work backstage and observe Green room details.
From this and my own use of them, I observed that every other green
room arrangement uses a single large space, with a single controllable
entrance, and a single logical spot for a repair table and makeup
station. Snack and water set-ups, strong coat racks, and full length
mirrors are important, especially at a CC. I conferred with Sheila about
Archon’s methods and borrowed some equipment.

Most of these preparations were completely wasted. Our hotel layout
required us to use three small rooms, each with 2 doors, for green
rooms, and a fourth for photography. Access through narrow hallways was
difficult for people in large costumes or on scooters. Each room already
had a large coat rack and a sink and counter- this was a plus. It was
necessary to plan for three snack set-ups, three mirrors and three times
the signage. When we needed only 2 of the rooms, I placed the third
mirror by the entrance to backstage, to give contestants one last look
at themselves- I saw several people take advantage of this.

Since they could only be in one room, the extensive makeup and repair
kits were very little used. Multiple rooms required more time than
allotted to set up, and contestants arrived too early. They had to be
lined up in order, and could not be allowed to settle in the wrong room,
so the full preparation of the multiple rooms simply never happened. As
it turns out, 2 volunteers at 4 would have been more useful than 10
volunteers at 6.

The most important technical item needed by a green room person is an
accurate running list of entries, their titles, and the number of people
in the entry. This is critical. If you are going to use a den system,
you must be able to divide people into roughly equal dens in their
running order ASAP in the day. NOTE: If you have to use multiple rooms
for your green room **DO NOT USE DENS** Divide your entrants into equal
groups between your rooms, and assign helpers to each room. I ended up
doing this for the Fashion show and Historical. Much simpler- just be
sure everyone knows their order number.Oddly enough, many comments were
made that our contestants seemed to LIKE the small green rooms- said
they were more “intimate”. Go Figure.

Our biggest problem in the green room area was information flow. The
opening time for the area was not in the programs, and was not told to
contestants when they registered, so they arrived too early, and through
the wrong doors, making it hard to find people and check them in. I
would ideally have liked to have had an Archon-style all contestant
meeting to make announcements and give a tour of the layout. I could at
that time have checked the names on my running lists. Lacking that, a
FAQ sheet and map, with complete instructions that our many newcomers
seriously needed, would have been extremely useful– to them and us.

I spent large amounts of time on Saturday tracking down a complete
running list to assist our preparation of the awards. The list I was
given had blanks for 4 entries, missing or incomplete casts, and large
numbers of misspelled words. I believe this was due to allowing the
contestants to make entries into a laptop, and accepting their entries
as accurate. A newcomer does not necessarily know what is important to
record, or what organizers need- they must be told. The information
should be entered for them, and then checked for spelling.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1573 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/6/2007
Subject: Brain dump – masquerades
Both went smoothly, from what our Masq Directors report. Our tech folks suggest that more time be scheduled for masquerade rehearsals – at least for the SF & F. Having only 10 minutes per entry was not quite enough time when there is only a 4-hour block scheduled. That’s only 6 rehearsals per hour, presuming no problems or time-hogs. Scheduling 15 minutes for each entry is better. Also, factor in breaks for the crew during the this block and before the shows.

Concoms: it’s a nice gesture to feed the crew on Saturday – they might not have time to get out to dinner. Some tasty pizzas make them very happy and remembered.

Question: Who’s responsible for where the Workmanship judges are set up? This was apparently a detail that fell between the cracks between the SF & F director and the Green Room co-ordinator, and led to a bit of initial consternation.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1574 From: bruno Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion

Back when I used to promote the local guild at local cons, I used to put out two different flyers. One with the local chapter info and artwork and another with general ICG info and the Glitiziana logo. I’d put out the same of each flyer and count how many were left. The Glitziana flyers always disappeared faster than the local guild flyers.

Michael

> ——-Original Message——-
> From: Bruce & Nora Mai <casamai@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: [runacc] More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion
> Sent: 06 Jun ’07 17:57
>
> Promotion – ICG
>
> I think the Guild could benefit from a strong promotion presence at CC.
> I’m not sure what form that should take – having a traveling road show of
> the Archives might be one idea. On a local level, at CC16, our “Jeff
> Table”, which was the SLCG merchandise, welcome wagon and other function
> table, worked quite well – this time, it was not successful. No
> memberships were sold, nor was there very much merchandise sold. Either
> things have changed, or we failed in getting people’s attention.
>
> In any case, the problem always is you have to have people willing to do
> the work.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1575 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: More Brain Dump – ICG Promotion

bruno wrote:

> Back when I used to promote the local guild at local cons, I used to put out two different flyers. One with the local chapter info and artwork and another with general ICG info and the Glitiziana logo. I’d put out the same of each flyer and count how many were left. The Glitziana flyers always disappeared faster than the local guild flyers.
>

Karen Heim and I were talking a little (but not enough, probably) about
tri-folds. Our CC26 tri-folds have a nearly-blank panel with Acrobat
form fields on it so we can print coupon codes without redoing the whole
tri-fold. My suggestion was to do an ICG tri-fold with “fill in the
blank” spaces for chapter name, address, website, and a few lines of
description.

No reason we couldn’t do the same thing with chapter fliers or use the
blank space in other ways…

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1576 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes

I appreciate Cathy’s comments, concerns, and frustration.

There are relatively non-greasy sources of protein that can generally be regarded as safe for consumption in the green room, just as there are very messy veggies and sources of sugar to eschew.

“If you have to use multiple green rooms, do not use dens.” In effect, each room is a den. It would need a den mom and one or more mother’s helpers to assist.

In my experience, giving the official photographer a dedicated space outside the green room has many advantages. It is my preference.

I agree that entrants should not enter their own information in the data base. for the Historical, I used paper forms (based on CC 24) and a staff member entered the information into the data base.

Information flow: As a masquerade director, I had no idea that the green room manager wanted an opportunity for an all-entrants meeting. I would have been happy to require one of the Historical’s entrants (in addition to tech rehearsal and pre-judging). Once committed to participating, entrants pretty much have to be where the MD wants them at the time the MD wants them there.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:00 PM
Subject: [runacc] Brain Dump – Green Room notes

Surprisingly, people seemed to like the fact that we had three separate green rooms. Our GR chief had thought it was a bad idea, until we gave her the feedback. Two different perspectives: from a logistics standpoint, it might have made it harder for her, but contestants loved it.

She chose not to have any protein among the backstage snacks, on her own assertions that she would not want “greasy foods” near her costumes. While I understand her thinking, I don’t agree with that decision, as we had some people wanting something other than sugar (I can’t remember, but I think we were light on vegetable matter, due to the hotel catering costs).

No one seemed to mind that there was not backstage feed.

Having the photographer in his own room, rather than sharing with one of the Green Rooms, worked very well.

The notes below came directly from our head of the Green Room in her own words.

More than a year before the convention, when no one else would
volunteer for the job, I decided that I could probably handle it, and
used CC24 and Archon to work backstage and observe Green room details.
From this and my own use of them, I observed that every other green
room arrangement uses a single large space, with a single controllable
entrance, and a single logical spot for a repair table and makeup
station. Snack and water set-ups, strong coat racks, and full length
mirrors are important, especially at a CC. I conferred with Sheila about
Archon’s methods and borrowed some equipment.

Most of these preparations were completely wasted. Our hotel layout
required us to use three small rooms, each with 2 doors, for green
rooms, and a fourth for photography. Access through narrow hallways was
difficult for people in large costumes or on scooters. Each room already
had a large coat rack and a sink and counter- this was a plus. It was
necessary to plan for three snack set-ups, three mirrors and three times
the signage. When we needed only 2 of the rooms, I placed the third
mirror by the entrance to backstage, to give contestants one last look
at themselves- I saw several people take advantage of this.

Since they could only be in one room, the extensive makeup and repair
kits were very little used. Multiple rooms required more time than
allotted to set up, and contestants arrived too early. They had to be
lined up in order, and could not be allowed to settle in the wrong room,
so the full preparation of the multiple rooms simply never happened. As
it turns out, 2 volunteers at 4 would have been more useful than 10
volunteers at 6.

The most important technical item needed by a green room person is an
accurate running list of entries, their titles, and the number of people
in the entry. This is critical. If you are going to use a den system,
you must be able to divide people into roughly equal dens in their
running order ASAP in the day. NOTE: If you have to use multiple rooms
for your green room **DO NOT USE DENS** Divide your entrants into equal
groups between your rooms, and assign helpers to each room. I ended up
doing this for the Fashion show and Historical. Much simpler- just be
sure everyone knows their order number.Oddly enough, many comments were
made that our contestants seemed to LIKE the small green rooms- said
they were more “intimate”. Go Figure.

Our biggest problem in the green room area was information flow. The
opening time for the area was not in the programs, and was not told to
contestants when they registered, so they arrived too early, and through
the wrong doors, making it hard to find people and check them in. I
would ideally have liked to have had an Archon-style all contestant
meeting to make announcements and give a tour of the layout. I could at
that time have checked the names on my running lists. Lacking that, a
FAQ sheet and map, with complete instructions that our many newcomers
seriously needed, would have been extremely useful– to them and us.

I spent large amounts of time on Saturday tracking down a complete
running list to assist our preparation of the awards. The list I was
given had blanks for 4 entries, missing or incomplete casts, and large
numbers of misspelled words. I believe this was due to allowing the
contestants to make entries into a laptop, and accepting their entries
as accurate. A newcomer does not necessarily know what is important to
record, or what organizers need- they must be told. The information
should be entered for them, and then checked for spelling.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1577 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes

I heartily agree with Byron’s comments. I entered the information into the
computer myself,, except in 2 instances – one of those was my daughter, who
can’t spell to save her life (much like her father). She covered for me so
I could take a much needed potty break.

The running order was ready as quickly as I could manage it, and tech
required multiple copies first, to do the rehearsals. I apologize for the
inconvenience.

Since the repair table, etc were in a separate room, an announcement to the
contestants should be enough to let them know their location. On the other
hand, perhaps CC entrants are more prepared to handle their own repairs than
SF con entrants. Just a thought.

Elaine

Nil significat nisi oscillat!

>I appreciate Cathy’s comments, concerns, and frustration.
>
>There are relatively non-greasy sources of protein that can generally be
>regarded as safe for consumption in the green room, just as there are very
>messy veggies and sources of sugar to eschew.
>
>”If you have to use multiple green rooms, do not use dens.” In effect,
>each room is a den. It would need a den mom and one or more mother’s
>helpers to assist.
>
>In my experience, giving the official photographer a dedicated space
>outside the green room has many advantages. It is my preference.
>
>I agree that entrants should not enter their own information in the data
>base. for the Historical, I used paper forms (based on CC 24) and a staff
>member entered the information into the data base.
>
>Information flow: As a masquerade director, I had no idea that the green
>room manager wanted an opportunity for an all-entrants meeting. I would
>have been happy to require one of the Historical’s entrants (in addition to
>tech rehearsal and pre-judging). Once committed to participating, entrants
>pretty much have to be where the MD wants them at the time the MD wants
>them there.
>
>Byron
>

>
> Surprisingly, people seemed to like the fact that we had three separate
>green rooms. Our GR chief had thought it was a bad idea, until we gave her
>the feedback. Two different perspectives: from a logistics standpoint, it
>might have made it harder for her, but contestants loved it.
>
> She chose not to have any protein among the backstage snacks, on her own
>assertions that she would not want “greasy foods” near her costumes. While
>I understand her thinking, I don’t agree with that decision, as we had some
>people wanting something other than sugar (I can’t remember, but I think we
>were light on vegetable matter, due to the hotel catering costs).
>
> No one seemed to mind that there was not backstage feed.
>
> Having the photographer in his own room, rather than sharing with one of
>the Green Rooms, worked very well.
>
> The notes below came directly from our head of the Green Room in her own
>words.
>
> More than a year before the convention, when no one else would
> volunteer for the job, I decided that I could probably handle it, and
> used CC24 and Archon to work backstage and observe Green room details.
> From this and my own use of them, I observed that every other green
> room arrangement uses a single large space, with a single controllable
> entrance, and a single logical spot for a repair table and makeup
> station. Snack and water set-ups, strong coat racks, and full length
> mirrors are important, especially at a CC. I conferred with Sheila about
> Archon’s methods and borrowed some equipment.
>
> Most of these preparations were completely wasted. Our hotel layout
> required us to use three small rooms, each with 2 doors, for green
> rooms, and a fourth for photography. Access through narrow hallways was
> difficult for people in large costumes or on scooters. Each room already
> had a large coat rack and a sink and counter- this was a plus. It was
> necessary to plan for three snack set-ups, three mirrors and three times
> the signage. When we needed only 2 of the rooms, I placed the third
> mirror by the entrance to backstage, to give contestants one last look
> at themselves- I saw several people take advantage of this.
>
> Since they could only be in one room, the extensive makeup and repair
> kits were very little used. Multiple rooms required more time than
> allotted to set up, and contestants arrived too early. They had to be
> lined up in order, and could not be allowed to settle in the wrong room,
> so the full preparation of the multiple rooms simply never happened. As
> it turns out, 2 volunteers at 4 would have been more useful than 10
> volunteers at 6.
>
> The most important technical item needed by a green room person is an
> accurate running list of entries, their titles, and the number of people
> in the entry. This is critical. If you are going to use a den system,
> you must be able to divide people into roughly equal dens in their
> running order ASAP in the day. NOTE: If you have to use multiple rooms
> for your green room **DO NOT USE DENS** Divide your entrants into equal
> groups between your rooms, and assign helpers to each room. I ended up
> doing this for the Fashion show and Historical. Much simpler- just be
> sure everyone knows their order number.Oddly enough, many comments were
> made that our contestants seemed to LIKE the small green rooms- said
> they were more “intimate”. Go Figure.
>
> Our biggest problem in the green room area was information flow. The
> opening time for the area was not in the programs, and was not told to
> contestants when they registered, so they arrived too early, and through
> the wrong doors, making it hard to find people and check them in. I
> would ideally have liked to have had an Archon-style all contestant
> meeting to make announcements and give a tour of the layout. I could at
> that time have checked the names on my running lists. Lacking that, a
> FAQ sheet and map, with complete instructions that our many newcomers
> seriously needed, would have been extremely useful– to them and us.
>
> I spent large amounts of time on Saturday tracking down a complete
> running list to assist our preparation of the awards. The list I was
> given had blanks for 4 entries, missing or incomplete casts, and large
> numbers of misspelled words. I believe this was due to allowing the
> contestants to make entries into a laptop, and accepting their entries
> as accurate. A newcomer does not necessarily know what is important to
> record, or what organizers need- they must be told. The information
> should be entered for them, and then checked for spelling.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i�m Initiative now.
It�s free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_June07

 

Group: runacc Message: 1578 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/7/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades

I support the use of 15-minute blocks for tech rehearsals. That’s what I used for the Historical at both 24 and 25. We never ran late. In fact, we ran early both times. At 25, at one point we were 30 minutes ahead of schedule and had to wait for entrants to arrive at their appointed times. Does this suggest that the blocks should be 12 1/2 minutes long?! (I don’t think so.)

Food. At Philcon, the cost of food for the tech crew is included in the masquerade budget.

The Historical doesn’t have separate workmanship judging. However, at CC’s, Worldcons, and regional masquerades, as a green room manager I have assumed that workmanship judging would be either in or immediately adjacent to the green room, since it has to be proximate to where the entrants are located before they go on stage. My preference would be to have the workmanship judge(s) and clerk at a station adjacent to the green room rather than in it. Either way, workmanship judging needs very good lighting as well as a place to take notes.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:03 PM
Subject: [runacc] Brain dump – masquerades

Both went smoothly, from what our Masq Directors report. Our tech folks suggest that more time be scheduled for masquerade rehearsals – at least for the SF & F. Having only 10 minutes per entry was not quite enough time when there is only a 4-hour block scheduled. That’s only 6 rehearsals per hour, presuming no problems or time-hogs. Scheduling 15 minutes for each entry is better. Also, factor in breaks for the crew during the this block and before the shows.

Concoms: it’s a nice gesture to feed the crew on Saturday – they might not have time to get out to dinner. Some tasty pizzas make them very happy and remembered.

Question: Who’s responsible for where the Workmanship judges are set up? This was apparently a detail that fell between the cracks between the SF & F director and the Green Room co-ordinator, and led to a bit of initial consternation.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1579 From: Elaine Mami Date: 6/8/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades

15 minute rehearsal slots would be ideal! However, with a four hour
schedule, we would have to limit the show to 16 entries. OTHH, we could use
all of Saturday for rehearsals, cutting off registration on Friday night.
Since we had very few people register on Sat., that does not seem like much
of a problem. And we did have a break for showers and food before the show.
I insist upon this.

Lunacon sends out for Pizza or Chinese for the tech crew for dinner before
the show.

I favor a spot out of the green room but nearby for workmanship judging, but
that often depends on the available space. At this past Lunacon, the concom
put the green room in a very unfavorable location, and we had to scramble
for a nook to have workmanship judging in. The location of the nook was
determined by myself and the green room director, Byron, who had an enormous
challenge with the whole space. He had a green room, hall and stairs!! My
point is, we have to make the best of what we are given.

Elaine

Nil significat nisi oscillat!

> Both went smoothly, from what our Masq Directors report. Our tech folks
>suggest that more time be scheduled for masquerade rehearsals – at least
>for the SF & F. Having only 10 minutes per entry was not quite enough time
>when there is only a 4-hour block scheduled. That’s only 6 rehearsals per
>hour, presuming no problems or time-hogs. Scheduling 15 minutes for each
>entry is better. Also, factor in breaks for the crew during the this block
>and before the shows.
>
> Concoms: it’s a nice gesture to feed the crew on Saturday – they might
>not have time to get out to dinner. Some tasty pizzas make them very happy
>and remembered.
>
> Question: Who’s responsible for where the Workmanship judges are set up?
>This was apparently a detail that fell between the cracks between the SF &
>F director and the Green Room co-ordinator, and led to a bit of initial
>consternation.

_________________________________________________________________
Don�t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/

 

Group: runacc Message: 1580 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/8/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – masquerades

Elaine Mami wrote:

> 15 minute rehearsal slots would be ideal! However, with a four hour
> schedule, we would have to limit the show to 16 entries. OTHH, we could use
> all of Saturday for rehearsals, cutting off registration on Friday night.
> Since we had very few people register on Sat., that does not seem like much
> of a problem. And we did have a break for showers and food before the show.
> I insist upon this.
>
> Lunacon sends out for Pizza or Chinese for the tech crew for dinner before
> the show.
>
> I favor a spot out of the green room but nearby for workmanship judging, but
> that often depends on the available space. At this past Lunacon, the concom
> put the green room in a very unfavorable location, and we had to scramble
> for a nook to have workmanship judging in. The location of the nook was
> determined by myself and the green room director, Byron, who had an enormous
> challenge with the whole space. He had a green room, hall and stairs!! My
> point is, we have to make the best of what we are given.
>
> Elaine
>
> Nil significat nisi oscillat!
>
>
>
>
>> Both went smoothly, from what our Masq Directors report. Our tech folks
>> suggest that more time be scheduled for masquerade rehearsals – at least
>> for the SF & F. Having only 10 minutes per entry was not quite enough time
>> when there is only a 4-hour block scheduled. That’s only 6 rehearsals per
>> hour, presuming no problems or time-hogs. Scheduling 15 minutes for each
>> entry is better. Also, factor in breaks for the crew during the this block
>> and before the shows.
>>

In Chicago we did 5 10 minute slots per hour, with a 10 minute “catch
up” empty slot at the end of each hour. Had the stage been ready on
time, we would have had plenty of rehearsal slots; as it was the crew
did a great job of running rehearsals quickly to make up for lost time.

We repeated that schedule at Anime Los Angeles for “early judging/photo”
sessions (i.e. get your workmanship judging in the afternoon instead of
in the green room, and with the size of the show, having a third of the
folks take an afternoon slot made everything work beautifully). The
schedule never slid more than 10 minutes, and at the beginning of each
hour it was back on schedule.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1581 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/11/2007
Subject: Re: Brain Dump – Green Room notes

We’re all pretty much used to the Archon model for doing things here. I suspect Cathy made leaps of assumption that she ought to know better about, given she’s been going to these as long as we have.

As I htink I implied, I didn’t necessarily agree with her on some of her choices of green room foods for the grease factor. Potato chips certainly qualify as greasy!

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Byron Connell
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Brain Dump – Green Room notes

I appreciate Cathy’s comments, concerns, and frustration.

There are relatively non-greasy sources of protein that can generally be regarded as safe for consumption in the green room, just as there are very messy veggies and sources of sugar to eschew.

“If you have to use multiple green rooms, do not use dens.” In effect, each room is a den. It would need a den mom and one or more mother’s helpers to assist.

In my experience, giving the official photographer a dedicated space outside the green room has many advantages. It is my preference.

I agree that entrants should not enter their own information in the data base. for the Historical, I used paper forms (based on CC 24) and a staff member entered the information into the data base.

Information flow: As a masquerade director, I had no idea that the green room manager wanted an opportunity for an all-entrants meeting. I would have been happy to require one of the Historical’s entrants (in addition to tech rehearsal and pre-judging). Once committed to participating, entrants pretty much have to be where the MD wants them at the time the MD wants them there.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:00 PM
Subject: [runacc] Brain Dump – Green Room notes

Surprisingly, people seemed to like the fact that we had three separate green rooms. Our GR chief had thought it was a bad idea, until we gave her the feedback. Two different perspectives: from a logistics standpoint, it might have made it harder for her, but contestants loved it.

She chose not to have any protein among the backstage snacks, on her own assertions that she would not want “greasy foods” near her costumes. While I understand her thinking, I don’t agree with that decision, as we had some people wanting something other than sugar (I can’t remember, but I think we were light on vegetable matter, due to the hotel catering costs).

No one seemed to mind that there was not backstage feed.

Having the photographer in his own room, rather than sharing with one of the Green Rooms, worked very well.

The notes below came directly from our head of the Green Room in her own words.

More than a year before the convention, when no one else would
volunteer for the job, I decided that I could probably handle it, and
used CC24 and Archon to work backstage and observe Green room details.
From this and my own use of them, I observed that every other green
room arrangement uses a single large space, with a single controllable
entrance, and a single logical spot for a repair table and makeup
station. Snack and water set-ups, strong coat racks, and full length
mirrors are important, especially at a CC. I conferred with Sheila about
Archon’s methods and borrowed some equipment.

Most of these preparations were completely wasted. Our hotel layout
required us to use three small rooms, each with 2 doors, for green
rooms, and a fourth for photography. Access through narrow hallways was
difficult for people in large costumes or on scooters. Each room already
had a large coat rack and a sink and counter- this was a plus. It was
necessary to plan for three snack set-ups, three mirrors and three times
the signage. When we needed only 2 of the rooms, I placed the third
mirror by the entrance to backstage, to give contestants one last look
at themselves- I saw several people take advantage of this.

Since they could only be in one room, the extensive makeup and repair
kits were very little used. Multiple rooms required more time than
allotted to set up, and contestants arrived too early. They had to be
lined up in order, and could not be allowed to settle in the wrong room,
so the full preparation of the multiple rooms simply never happened. As
it turns out, 2 volunteers at 4 would have been more useful than 10
volunteers at 6.

The most important technical item needed by a green room person is an
accurate running list of entries, their titles, and the number of people
in the entry. This is critical. If you are going to use a den system,
you must be able to divide people into roughly equal dens in their
running order ASAP in the day. NOTE: If you have to use multiple rooms
for your green room **DO NOT USE DENS** Divide your entrants into equal
groups between your rooms, and assign helpers to each room. I ended up
doing this for the Fashion show and Historical. Much simpler- just be
sure everyone knows their order number.Oddly enough, many comments were
made that our contestants seemed to LIKE the small green rooms- said
they were more “intimate”. Go Figure.

Our biggest problem in the green room area was information flow. The
opening time for the area was not in the programs, and was not told to
contestants when they registered, so they arrived too early, and through
the wrong doors, making it hard to find people and check them in. I
would ideally have liked to have had an Archon-style all contestant
meeting to make announcements and give a tour of the layout. I could at
that time have checked the names on my running lists. Lacking that, a
FAQ sheet and map, with complete instructions that our many newcomers
seriously needed, would have been extremely useful– to them and us.

I spent large amounts of time on Saturday tracking down a complete
running list to assist our preparation of the awards. The list I was
given had blanks for 4 entries, missing or incomplete casts, and large
numbers of misspelled words. I believe this was due to allowing the
contestants to make entries into a laptop, and accepting their entries
as accurate. A newcomer does not necessarily know what is important to
record, or what organizers need- they must be told. The information
should be entered for them, and then checked for spelling.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1582 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/11/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes
Concom notes

Dana Hinterleitner and DJ Mestel’s work on con signage was a quantum leap beyond anything we’ve seen a conventions. They definitely raised the bar to a height that will be hard to match. Other cons, including our regional (and this year’s NASFic) were taking notes and photos. Maybe if I think of it, I’ll post them somewhere so those who were unable to attend can see them – they’re really top notch.

In addition to the banners, there was the very cool kiosk (with a big, movable “Today” sign on top) with panel programming printed in nice big type, which our attendees really liked. The only complaints about signage was that it wasn’t always clear what room had what programming, even though there was a schedule posted outside each function room. It could be the room names were somewhat covered by the posted schedules.

We really lucked out here: Dana is a graphic artist by profession, and DJ had some nifty tools to produce the banners that hung from the concourse skylights. They got a lot of their materials and access to tools for free, keeping expenditures down in the low $300 range. If we hadn’t had these two folks, the signage would have cost probably three times that much. But, let’s be honest – we wouldn’t have paid that much, in any case.

Dana was in Ops at her computer quite a bit of the time Friday, making last minute signage updates, and additional ones we hadn’t thought of. Never having worked as a con staffer before, she was a real trouper.

We had fairly few staff issues. Most of the SLCG have been friends for a long time, so we know each other fairly well. There was still a bit of a problem with one person who apparently didn’t think through a lot of logistics for the Shoe competition. She couldn’t tell me how many awards she might need, she didn’t stick around to make sure the display was put away at night, etc. She was depending on someone else (me, mostly, I guess), to take care of these details. She didn’t ask about them. I realize I should have followed up on this, but it bugged the heck out of me that I should have to. Because she’s a friend, though, I didn’t think I could come down too hard on her.

She doesn’t have email access. The fact that she doesn’t answer her phone in a timely manner when a message was left didn’t help, either. I recommend that it should be required that all con staffers have some sort of email access, these days.

As Co-chair, I accepted that I wouldn’t be able to enjoy much of the con as I would have liked. Obviously, one should be available to answer questions.

Pierre and I both wound up filling in where there were details overlooked – helping in the green room, getting food for the tech crew when they didn’t have time to do it themselves, making sure the staff had everything they needed, etc. I spent a lot of time walking around – no time for relaxing.

Kudos have to be given to Kerry Gilley. I can’t remember if he had originally volunteered to be Fan Photographer ( which looking back now, we didn’t need), but he stepped up when our original Official Photographer had to back out. He was very polite, he actively sought out people in the halls to get their pictures, and was very conciencious. He’s apparently been trying to get more important photography positions at cons, and this was his first big break. As a result, he has produced the largest folio of photos for a CC to date: 1300 pictures.

A lot of us are used to having to wait weeks or several months to get official con photos. The Web is making it a lot easier, faster – and even more importantly cheaper — to get them now, with services like Flickr and others. While his 5 CD package is a really good deal, we urged him to investigate these services as an alternative delivery system, which should make get him more work. Almost everyone was pleaed with the photos. Granted, maybe some of the shots were off center slighlty, but they coudl be corrected with a little cropping. This was his first major gig. He’ll learn. We would recommend him as a con photographer, so long as he learns a bit more about Windows Vista in the meantime. He ahd some problems with it as he was storing and accessing the photos that the shot because he’d just bought the laptop he was using.

While Carl was our official videographer, people appreciated having Sue and Eric there selling the DVDs on site the next day, and at reasonable prices. The precedent was set at CC24 for a quicker turn around for both photos and DVDs, and people will begin expect this to be the norm at future CCs soon, I suspect.

Nora served as both our Treasurer and Membership Co-ordinator. We recommend strongly that this combination of responsibilities be assigned to the same person in future. It made for tight records keeping before and at the con. She can cite a number of anecdotes where her memory of who was pre-registered came in handy.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1583 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: More (general) Promotion…
I’m going to start posting a “picture-a-day” from the CC archives on
<http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con/>. I’ve set up a little
spreadsheet that helps me randomly select a picture from F&SF,
Historical, Future Fashion and, if they exist, Doll and Single
Pattern competition.

Each picture-a-day will include:
•a link to the visual archives page
•the entry information
•any awards won
•the photographer’s information (if available)

No, I haven’t included the other competitions, it took about 45
minutes to build the spreadsheet with just the three required and two
relatively regular competitions.

No, there may not be a picture every day, at least on days that I
don’t have internet access or am swamped. If you want to help with
the posting, though, talk to me.

Yes, if you would like to post the “picture-a-day” on other Ccostume-
Con related online services (like, say, the Costume-Con mySpace) I
can put you on a mailing list to get the information in advance.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1584 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes

1. Dana’s signs were awesome!

2. The con chair is there to work, not to have fun. (So there!)

3. Kerry did an excellent job as official photographer. He deserves greater recognition and employment.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Brain dump – Concom notes

Concom notes

Dana Hinterleitner and DJ Mestel’s work on con signage was a quantum leap beyond anything we’ve seen a conventions. They definitely raised the bar to a height that will be hard to match. Other cons, including our regional (and this year’s NASFic) were taking notes and photos. Maybe if I think of it, I’ll post them somewhere so those who were unable to attend can see them – they’re really top notch.

In addition to the banners, there was the very cool kiosk (with a big, movable “Today” sign on top) with panel programming printed in nice big type, which our attendees really liked. The only complaints about signage was that it wasn’t always clear what room had what programming, even though there was a schedule posted outside each function room. It could be the room names were somewhat covered by the posted schedules.

We really lucked out here: Dana is a graphic artist by profession, and DJ had some nifty tools to produce the banners that hung from the concourse skylights. They got a lot of their materials and access to tools for free, keeping expenditures down in the low $300 range. If we hadn’t had these two folks, the signage would have cost probably three times that much. But, let’s be honest – we wouldn’t have paid that much, in any case.

Dana was in Ops at her computer quite a bit of the time Friday, making last minute signage updates, and additional ones we hadn’t thought of. Never having worked as a con staffer before, she was a real trouper.

We had fairly few staff issues. Most of the SLCG have been friends for a long time, so we know each other fairly well. There was still a bit of a problem with one person who apparently didn’t think through a lot of logistics for the Shoe competition. She couldn’t tell me how many awards she might need, she didn’t stick around to make sure the display was put away at night, etc. She was depending on someone else (me, mostly, I guess), to take care of these details. She didn’t ask about them. I realize I should have followed up on this, but it bugged the heck out of me that I should have to. Because she’s a friend, though, I didn’t think I could come down too hard on her.

She doesn’t have email access. The fact that she doesn’t answer her phone in a timely manner when a message was left didn’t help, either. I recommend that it should be required that all con staffers have some sort of email access, these days.

As Co-chair, I accepted that I wouldn’t be able to enjoy much of the con as I would have liked. Obviously, one should be available to answer questions.

Pierre and I both wound up filling in where there were details overlooked – helping in the green room, getting food for the tech crew when they didn’t have time to do it themselves, making sure the staff had everything they needed, etc. I spent a lot of time walking around – no time for relaxing.

Kudos have to be given to Kerry Gilley. I can’t remember if he had originally volunteered to be Fan Photographer ( which looking back now, we didn’t need), but he stepped up when our original Official Photographer had to back out. He was very polite, he actively sought out people in the halls to get their pictures, and was very conciencious. He’s apparently been trying to get more important photography positions at cons, and this was his first big break. As a result, he has produced the largest folio of photos for a CC to date: 1300 pictures.

A lot of us are used to having to wait weeks or several months to get official con photos. The Web is making it a lot easier, faster – and even more importantly cheaper — to get them now, with services like Flickr and others. While his 5 CD package is a really good deal, we urged him to investigate these services as an alternative delivery system, which should make get him more work. Almost everyone was pleaed with the photos. Granted, maybe some of the shots were off center slighlty, but they coudl be corrected with a little cropping. This was his first major gig. He’ll learn. We would recommend him as a con photographer, so long as he learns a bit more about Windows Vista in the meantime. He ahd some problems with it as he was storing and accessing the photos that the shot because he’d just bought the laptop he was using.

While Carl was our official videographer, people appreciated having Sue and Eric there selling the DVDs on site the next day, and at reasonable prices. The precedent was set at CC24 for a quicker turn around for both photos and DVDs, and people will begin expect this to be the norm at future CCs soon, I suspect.

Nora served as both our Treasurer and Membership Co-ordinator. We recommend strongly that this combination of responsibilities be assigned to the same person in future. It made for tight records keeping before and at the con. She can cite a number of anecdotes where her memory of who was pre-registered came in handy.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1585 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 6/12/2007
Subject: Re: More (general) Promotion…

Noticed it – very cool!

Thanks!

Betsy

Andrew T Trembley wrote:

> I’m going to start posting a “picture-a-day” from the CC archives on
> <http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con/>. I’ve set up a little
> spreadsheet that helps me randomly select a picture from F&SF,
> Historical, Future Fashion and, if they exist, Doll and Single
> Pattern competition.
>
> Each picture-a-day will include:
> •a link to the visual archives page
> •the entry information
> •any awards won
> •the photographer’s information (if available)
>
> No, I haven’t included the other competitions, it took about 45
> minutes to build the spreadsheet with just the three required and two
> relatively regular competitions.
>
> No, there may not be a picture every day, at least on days that I
> don’t have internet access or am swamped. If you want to help with
> the posting, though, talk to me.
>
> Yes, if you would like to post the “picture-a-day” on other Ccostume-
> Con related online services (like, say, the Costume-Con mySpace) I
> can put you on a mailing list to get the information in advance.
>
> andy
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1586 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 6/13/2007
Subject: Re: Brain dump – Concom notes

In a message dated 6/12/2007 6:51:35 PM Central Daylight Time,
bpconnell@verizon.net writes:

> 1. Dana’s signs were awesome!
>

Ditto!

> 2. The con chair is there to work, not to have fun. (So there!)

Double ditto!

>
> 3. Kerry did an excellent job as official photographer. He deserves greater
> recognition and employment.
>
>

Hmmm. I have been giving him serious consideration.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
View the latest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/
Questions?: http://community.livejournal.com/costume_con_28/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1587 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Archon NASFic newflash
Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down to CC.

Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in some allowance.

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1588 From: Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention C Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

We already have a line item in our budget for an AASCAP performance
license (which is what is required for our type of use).

And, I’m somewhat proud to say, it’s been there since day one, long
before the Dragon Con fiasco happened.

Kevin

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down
> to CC.
>
> Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going
> after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon
> is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful
> – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the
> masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on
> their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge
> according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in
> some allowance.
>
> Bruce
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1589 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention Chair wrote:

> We already have a line item in our budget for an AASCAP performance
> license (which is what is required for our type of use).
>
> And, I’m somewhat proud to say, it’s been there since day one, long
> before the Dragon Con fiasco happened.
>

We learned this from the L.A.con folks; Craig Miller works in the biz
and the LA conventions (and all Worldcons) have had licenses for years.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1590 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention Chair wrote:

> We already have a line item in our budget for an AASCAP performance
> license (which is what is required for our type of use).
>
> And, I’m somewhat proud to say, it’s been there since day one, long
> before the Dragon Con fiasco happened.
>

We learned this from the L.A.con folks; Craig Miller works in the biz
and the LA conventions (and all Worldcons) have had licenses for years.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1591 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

I was under the impression that concoms were paying licensing fees. I understand that Lunacon and Arisia do, and I believe that the Worldcon normally does. With the Worldcon out of the country, that may be why ASCAP has focused on Tuckercon (formerly Archon). A one-time use license is not expensive and a CC concom ought to budget for it.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: [runacc] Archon NASFic newflash

Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down to CC.

Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in some allowance.

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1592 From: Marty Gear Date: 6/16/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

Balticon has been getting the license for some time too, and while
CostumeCons are probably small enough to stay under the radar (what
AASCP could collect wouldn’t pay for a lawyer’s fee to write a demand
letter – damages are based upon the size of the audience) given AASCAP’s
current attitude CC-27 will get a license just to avoid the annoyance.

Marty

Byron Connell wrote:

>
> I was under the impression that concoms were paying licensing fees. I
> understand that Lunacon and Arisia do, and I believe that the Worldcon
> normally does. With the Worldcon out of the country, that may be why
> ASCAP has focused on Tuckercon (formerly Archon). A one-time use
> license is not expensive and a CC concom ought to budget for it.
>
> Byron
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:casamai%40sbcglobal.net>>
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:runacc%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:runacc%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:39 PM
> Subject: [runacc] Archon NASFic newflash
>
> Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down
> to CC.
>
> Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going
> after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon
> is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful
> – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the
> masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on
> their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge
> according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in
> some allowance.
>
> Bruce
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1593 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/17/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

I guess that doesn’t surprise me that California would have that in place long before now. Nonetheless, future CCs this side of the Rockies will need to be aware….

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Kevin Roche, Costume-con 26 Convention Chair
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Archon NASFic newflash

We already have a line item in our budget for an AASCAP performance
license (which is what is required for our type of use).

And, I’m somewhat proud to say, it’s been there since day one, long
before the Dragon Con fiasco happened.

Kevin

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
>
> Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down
> to CC.
>
> Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going
> after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon
> is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful
> – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the
> masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on
> their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge
> according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in
> some allowance.
>
> Bruce
>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1594 From: Charles Galway Date: 6/17/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash
CC-23 (Utah) had considered getting a license, but I think it just didn’t
get done (lost in the noise).

One concern I had, was the additional factor of video sales of the CC
masquerade, since I thought that may be as much, or more of a concern to the
ASCAP folks.

Charles Galway

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1595 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 6/18/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

Then it sounds like it’s definitely a case of they zeroed in on NASFic.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Byron Connell
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Archon NASFic newflash

I was under the impression that concoms were paying licensing fees. I understand that Lunacon and Arisia do, and I believe that the Worldcon normally does. With the Worldcon out of the country, that may be why ASCAP has focused on Tuckercon (formerly Archon). A one-time use license is not expensive and a CC concom ought to budget for it.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: [runacc] Archon NASFic newflash

Even though the subject is about Archon, this could easily filter down to CC.

Just got off the phone with Sheila, and apparently AASCAP is going after cons other than Dragon Con. Now, maybe it’s only because Archon is hosting NASFic, but maybe not. The fees being charged aren’t awful – apparently around $200, but if the bastards are going after the masquerades, it may be only a matter of time before CCs appear on their radar. One hopes that if they’re going to do this, they charge according to the size of the con. So you may want to start figuring in some allowance.

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1596 From: Martin Gear Date: 6/19/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

From what I have been able to learn, there are a couple of factors. If
each music selection is less than 60 seconds, then it is “fair use” and
no license is needed. (That’s one way to get presentations to speed up
😛 ). If the number of DVDs produced is less than 500 then AASCAP
probably won’t do anything more than write a cease & desist letter from
their in-house counsel as the damages than they could collect (the
profit on the number of DVDs sold) is insufficient for them to pursue
further. Also, the “Performance license” fee is based upon the
anticipated number of people in the audience and since that is typically
less than 500 at a Costume Con it would be minimal if you had to buy one
after the fact. More than anything else it would be an annoyance factor
for most regional cons. Dragon Con with 20K people is a different
animal and WorldCons with 5 or 6K might be enough to get their
attention. These are the idiots who have threatened teenagers and
grandmothers for downloading copyrighted music because they really
haven’t caught up to today’s technology and who don’t realize that the
reduced sales of CD’s is because they are charging too much for “poc”
CD’s that contain only one or two worthwhile numbers in 90% of the cases.

It is up to the com-com to decide how much lack of annoyance is worth
and what their potential exposure is, but please don’t lose any sleep
over this silliness.

Marty

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Then it sounds like it’s definitely a case of they zeroed in on NASFic.
>
> Bruce
>
> –
>
> ___

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1597 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 6/20/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

At 01:47 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:

> From what I have been able to learn, there are a couple of factors. If
>each music selection is less than 60 seconds, then it is “fair use” and
>no license is needed. (That’s one way to get presentations to speed up
>:-P ). If the number of DVDs produced is less than 500 then AASCAP
>probably won’t do anything more than write a cease & desist letter from
>their in-house counsel as the damages than they could collect (the
>profit on the number of DVDs sold) is insufficient for them to pursue
>further. Also, the “Performance license” fee is based upon the
>anticipated number of people in the audience and since that is typically
>less than 500 at a Costume Con it would be minimal if you had to buy one
>after the fact. More than anything else it would be an annoyance factor
>for most regional cons. Dragon Con with 20K people is a different
>animal and WorldCons with 5 or 6K might be enough to get their
>attention. These are the idiots who have threatened teenagers and
>grandmothers for downloading copyrighted music because they really
>haven’t caught up to today’s technology and who don’t realize that the
>reduced sales of CD’s is because they are charging too much for “poc”
>CD’s that contain only one or two worthwhile numbers in 90% of the cases.

I know. They’re hitting the University of Nebraska hard on this. I
think they’ve threatened about 50 kids. So far they’ve all settled.

Pierre

>It is up to the com-com to decide how much lack of annoyance is worth
>and what their potential exposure is, but please don’t lose any sleep
>over this silliness.
>
>Marty
>
>Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> >
> > Then it sounds like it’s definitely a case of they zeroed in on NASFic.
> >
> > Bruce

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1598 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 6/21/2007
Subject: Re: Archon NASFic newflash

Don’t confuse the ASCAP licensing situation with the RIAA bootleg
copying lawsuits.

They are actually different beasties.

Frankly, DragonCon was being just plain stupid, with a 20,000+
conference with a huge online presence, to ignore the fact that they
needed licenses for their performances.

Kevin

Pierre & Sandy Pettinger wrote:

>
> s.
>
> I know. They’re hitting the University of Nebraska hard on this. I
> think they’ve threatened about 50 kids. So far they’ve all settled.
>
> Pierre
>
> >
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1599 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: What’s wrong with this webpage?
http://www.dragoncon.net/costuming/

Well, beside that it’s ugly…

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1600 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 8/1/2007
Subject: Re: What’s wrong with this webpage?

Ummm… The CC26 logo lurking to the right?

Nora

> —–Original Message—–
> From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Trembley
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 1:26 AM
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [runacc] What’s wrong with this webpage?
>
> http://www.dragoncon.net/costuming/
>
> Well, beside that it’s ugly…
>
> andy
>
>
>
> View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

 

 

Yahoo Archive: Page 31 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 31 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 1501 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/5/2007
Subject: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1502 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/6/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1503 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/6/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1504 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/7/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1505 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/7/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1506 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/8/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1507 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/8/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database
Group: runacc Message: 1508 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/10/2007
Subject: Re: CC classes suggestion
Group: runacc Message: 1509 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/10/2007
Subject: Re: CC classes suggestion
Group: runacc Message: 1510 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/13/2007
Subject: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1511 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1512 From: bruno Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1513 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1514 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1515 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1516 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1517 From: Karen Heim Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1518 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1519 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1520 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1521 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1522 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/19/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1523 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Group: runacc Message: 1524 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1525 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1526 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1527 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1528 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/21/2007
Subject: Almost done…Really!
Group: runacc Message: 1529 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/22/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1530 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/22/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Group: runacc Message: 1531 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/25/2007
Subject: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1532 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1533 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1534 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1535 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1536 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1537 From: David Doering Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1538 From: bruno Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1539 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1540 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1541 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1542 From: Charles Galway Date: 4/27/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1543 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2007
Subject: what are people saying about CC25?
Group: runacc Message: 1544 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1545 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Group: runacc Message: 1546 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 5/5/2007
Subject: Invitations sent to the CC26 mailing lists… thanks to CC25!
Group: runacc Message: 1547 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/5/2007
Subject: Re: Invitations sent to the CC26 mailing lists… thanks to CC25!
Group: runacc Message: 1548 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/11/2007
Subject: Fwd: “Piecework” article
Group: runacc Message: 1549 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/13/2007
Subject: Re: Fwd: “Piecework” article
Group: runacc Message: 1550 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/22/2007
Subject: CC25 Post -mortem

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 1501 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/5/2007
Subject: the CC25 database
Once the Membership database is updated from the con I’ll format a list of persons who wanted to receive info about future CCs. Any requests as to how everybody would like that & what info they’d find useful from our database?

Nora

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1502 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/6/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

In a message dated 4/5/2007 9:23:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> Any requests as to how everybody would like that &what info they’d find
> useful from our database?

Nora,
What format do you have in at this point?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1503 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/6/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

I also was going to ask what format was being used.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] the CC25 database

In a message dated 4/5/2007 9:23:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> Any requests as to how everybody would like that &what info they’d find
> useful from our database?
Nora,
What format do you have in at this point?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 – Release Date: 4/5/2007 3:33 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1504 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/7/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

Access & Excel

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] the CC25 database

In a message dated 4/5/2007 9:23:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> Any requests as to how everybody would like that &what info they’d find
> useful from our database?
Nora,
What format do you have in at this point?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1505 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/7/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

In a message dated 4/7/2007 2:45:14 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> Access &Excel
>
>
>
>
>

Excel, please!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1506 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/8/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

Primo. I can read both.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] the CC25 database

Access & Excel

Nora
—– Original Message —–
From: osierhenry@cs.com
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] the CC25 database

In a message dated 4/5/2007 9:23:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:
> Any requests as to how everybody would like that &what info they’d find
> useful from our database?
Nora,
What format do you have in at this point?
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/750 – Release Date: 4/6/2007 9:30 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1507 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/8/2007
Subject: Re: the CC25 database

As can I.

Kevin

Ricky & Karen Dick wrote:

>
> Primo. I can read both.
>
> –Karen
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: Bruce & Nora Mai
> To: runacc@yahoogroups.com <mailto:runacc%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [runacc] the CC25 database
>
> Access & Excel
>
> Nora
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1508 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/10/2007
Subject: Re: CC classes suggestion

(shifting over to RunaCC)

On Apr 10, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> The theory is, as you’ve eloquently pointed out, we’re all adults
> here and should be responsible about how long a panel has. At the
> very least, moderators should be cognizant of dwindling time.

Frankly, I saw a few adults who should have known better not paying
attention to how long their panels ran, or that they were supposed to
be on a panel in 5 minutes.

Were there moderators? I got nothing telling me who the moderator for
any of my panels were. Granted, they were 2, 3 and 4 people. They
didn’t need much moderation, but I wouldn’t have minded handing the
clock off to someone else.

> I hate to sound like the old fart here, but we’ve not usually had
> time problems at CCs before. Granted, Kevin had a point when there
> was set up time needed for panels like his, and perhaps a
> programming person does need to look in on things. But for the
> most part, panels ran smoothly without many disruptions.

Two of my three panels were impacted by other panels running late and
not being out of the room when we were supposed to start. The one
that didn’t was the first panel of the day for that room. One (which
you were on) moved to the concourse, because there was no way the
panel that was running where we were supposed to be was going to
finish so we could move in.

It’s a matter of perception.

If you tell people, “Panels are an hour” some panelists will take it
as a license to fill the whole hour, without consideration for clean-
up time or the next panel coming in (I’m thinking of a table full of
dolls and doll clothes that had to be bagged and hauled away). If you
tell people “Panels are 50 minutes, with a 10 minute break” you’ve
established a clear instruction of where turnover-time happens, and
that burning the next panel’s time for your clean-up is unacceptable.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1509 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/10/2007
Subject: Re: CC classes suggestion

Valid criticisms.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: [runacc] Re: CC classes suggestion

(shifting over to RunaCC)

On Apr 10, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> The theory is, as you’ve eloquently pointed out, we’re all adults
> here and should be responsible about how long a panel has. At the
> very least, moderators should be cognizant of dwindling time.

Frankly, I saw a few adults who should have known better not paying
attention to how long their panels ran, or that they were supposed to
be on a panel in 5 minutes.

Were there moderators? I got nothing telling me who the moderator for
any of my panels were. Granted, they were 2, 3 and 4 people. They
didn’t need much moderation, but I wouldn’t have minded handing the
clock off to someone else.

> I hate to sound like the old fart here, but we’ve not usually had
> time problems at CCs before. Granted, Kevin had a point when there
> was set up time needed for panels like his, and perhaps a
> programming person does need to look in on things. But for the
> most part, panels ran smoothly without many disruptions.

Two of my three panels were impacted by other panels running late and
not being out of the room when we were supposed to start. The one
that didn’t was the first panel of the day for that room. One (which
you were on) moved to the concourse, because there was no way the
panel that was running where we were supposed to be was going to
finish so we could move in.

It’s a matter of perception.

If you tell people, “Panels are an hour” some panelists will take it
as a license to fill the whole hour, without consideration for clean-
up time or the next panel coming in (I’m thinking of a table full of
dolls and doll clothes that had to be bagged and hauled away). If you
tell people “Panels are 50 minutes, with a 10 minute break” you’ve
established a clear instruction of where turnover-time happens, and
that burning the next panel’s time for your clean-up is unacceptable.

andy

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1510 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/13/2007
Subject: Future CCs Mailing list
I’m not completely finished crunching the numbers but I’ve managed to
finalize a stripped out Excel sheet of CC25 members who wanted to
receive future CC mailings. Figured you guys would want this soon so
you could hit ’em up while they’re still excited.

There are 191 records that include name, address, city, state, zip,
country, phone & email. So you can mail merge them easily for a
mailing. Bound to be some people who are already on your mailing lists
but we had a good number of first timers so could be good for you.

I have also left in their age – there are some under 21, your call if
you want to mail them or not.

It’s uploaded to the file section here in Yahoo. If you’d like me to
email it to you personally let me know.

Nora

 

Group: runacc Message: 1511 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Fun with online membership databases…
I promised my committee that I’d write these functions after I got home
from CC25…

You can now view the (dynamically generated) membership directory for
Costume-Con 26 at
<https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_directory.php>

and the geographical distribution of our membership at
<https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_geography.php>

Kevin

(who wanted to paint the latter numbers on a US map but decided it was
way more work than the result was worth, and besides, not everyone’s
coming from the US… and I hold out hope for a few trans-Atlantic members)

 

Group: runacc Message: 1512 From: bruno Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404 errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they work.

Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership page only lists about 156(ish).

Michael

> ——-Original Message——-
> From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair <chair@cc26.info>
> Subject: [runacc] Fun with online membership databases…
> Sent: 17 Apr ’07 23:01
>
> I promised my committee that I’d write these functions after I got home
> from CC25…
>
> You can now view the (dynamically generated) membership directory for
> Costume-Con 26 at
> <[LINK: https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_directory.php%5d
> https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_directory.php>
>
> and the geographical distribution of our membership at
> <[LINK: https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_geography.php%5d
> https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_geography.php>
>
> Kevin
>
> (who wanted to paint the latter numbers on a US map but decided it was
> way more work than the result was worth, and besides, not everyone’s
> coming from the US… and I hold out hope for a few trans-Atlantic
> members)
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1513 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

And I noticed that I’m not listed although I know I have a
membership. So that explains at least one difference in the counts.

Nora

— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, “bruno” <bruno@…> wrote:
>
> If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404
errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they work.
>
> Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership
page only lists about 156(ish).
>
>
> Michael
>
>
> > ——-Original Message——-
> > From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair <chair@…>
> > Subject: [runacc] Fun with online membership databases…
> > Sent: 17 Apr ’07 23:01
> >
> > I promised my committee that I’d write these functions after I
got home
> > from CC25…
> >
> > You can now view the (dynamically generated) membership
directory for
> > Costume-Con 26 at
> > <[LINK:
https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_directory.php%5d
> > https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_directory.php>
> >
> > and the geographical distribution of our membership at
> > <[LINK:
https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_geography.php%5d
> > https://www.cc26.info/interactive/view_member_geography.php>
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > (who wanted to paint the latter numbers on a US map but decided
it was
> > way more work than the result was worth, and besides, not
everyone’s
> > coming from the US… and I hold out hope for a few trans-
Atlantic
> > members)
> >
> >
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1514 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:38 AM, bruno wrote:

> If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404
> errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they work.
>
> Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership page
> only lists about 156(ish).

Membership page only lists people who set “show my name in the member
directory.” People who registered before we had that blank in the
system aren’t shown; we chose to assume “no” rather than assume “yes.”

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1515 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

Hmm… the links work in my email client. I have no idea why you got the
404s… unless you happened to try while I was doing a debug refresh.

The difference in numbers is (mostly) because 78 members have chosen to
not display their names in the directory. I have a few members who, for
some reason, don’t show up in spite of having opted-in to listing until
I re-save their profiles. No changes, just open and re-save.
Mysteeeeerious…

Kevin

bruno wrote:

>
> If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404 errors. If
> I navigate through from the homepage, they work.
>
> Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership page
> only lists about 156(ish).
>
> Michael
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1516 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

Ahh! That explains it. Okay, cool. I registered at CC24 so I guess
that was “before”.
Any blanks in our optional questions were assumed to be ‘No’ as well.

Nora
— In runacc@yahoogroups.com, Andrew T Trembley <attrembl@…>
wrote:

>
>
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:38 AM, bruno wrote:
>
> > If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404
> > errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they work.
> >
> > Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership

page

> > only lists about 156(ish).
>
> Membership page only lists people who set “show my name in the

member

> directory.” People who registered before we had that blank in the
> system aren’t shown; we chose to assume “no” rather than

assume “yes.”

>
> andy
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1517 From: Karen Heim Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

I think I registered right after you, though, and I show
up. Odd.

Karen

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:55:01 -0000
“Bruce & Nora Mai” <casamai@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Ahh! That explains it. Okay, cool. I registered at CC24
>so I guess
> that was “before”.
> Any blanks in our optional questions were assumed to be
>’No’ as well.
>
> Nora
> — In runacc@yahoogroups.com, Andrew T Trembley
><attrembl@…>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:38 AM, bruno wrote:
>>
>> > If I follow the links from the msg, I get two
>>different 404
>> > errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they
>>work.
>> >
>> > Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the
>>Membership
> page
>> > only lists about 156(ish).
>>
>> Membership page only lists people who set “show my name
>>in the
> member
>> directory.” People who registered before we had that
>>blank in the
>> system aren’t shown; we chose to assume “no” rather than
> assume “yes.”
>>
>> andy
>>
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1518 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

Well, I’m on there now. Kevin must have made some adjustments (as he said in his other email).

Nora

Karen Heim <axejudge@accessus.net> wrote:
I think I registered right after you, though, and I show
up. Odd.

Karen

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:55:01 -0000
“Bruce & Nora Mai” wrote:

> Ahh! That explains it. Okay, cool. I registered at CC24
>so I guess
> that was “before”.
> Any blanks in our optional questions were assumed to be
>’No’ as well.
>
> Nora
> — In runacc@yahoogroups.com, Andrew T Trembley
>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:38 AM, bruno wrote:
>>
>> > If I follow the links from the msg, I get two
>>different 404
>> > errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they
>>work.
>> >
>> > Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the
>>Membership
> page
>> > only lists about 156(ish).
>>
>> Membership page only lists people who set “show my name
>>in the
> member
>> directory.” People who registered before we had that
>>blank in the
>> system aren’t shown; we chose to assume “no” rather than
> assume “yes.”
>>
>> andy
>>
>
>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1519 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…
Yo! Grand Master K! I seem to be having the same problem as Nora. Probably
for the same reason.

Henry Osier
Chief Spy
Costume-Con 28 in Milwaukee in 2010
www.CC28.org
For the newest Intell: http://agent-milw.livejournal.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1520 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

Yes, yours was one where I did the magic “open and re-save profile” trick.

I’ve modified the syntax of the query in the directory script slightly,
and now I have 161 members listed in the directory, which is what a raw
database query tells me should be showing (238 members less 76 who opted
out and 1 Youth membership without a badge name).

So I think the glitch is now dead. If someone else tells me they aren’t
showing I’ll go back and look again.

Kevin

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Well, I’m on there now. Kevin must have made some adjustments (as he
> said in his other email).
>
> Nora
>
> Karen Heim <axejudge@accessus.net <mailto:axejudge%40accessus.net>> wrote:
> I think I registered right after you, though, and I show
> up. Odd.
>
> Karen
>
> _,_._,___

 

Group: runacc Message: 1521 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/18/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

OK, the back door query shows you as NOT having opted in to listing.
I’ve also ascertained that the glitch appeared to be that when I opened
the form it was always showing “yes” and then saving the profile
properly with that as the new value. You now show up.

Fortunately, all the profiles I opened recently were because people
wanted their names listed 😉
(and the script to load the form is now fixed).

Kevin

osierhenry@cs.com wrote:

>
> Yo! Grand Master K! I seem to be having the same problem as Nora.
> Probably
> for the same reason.
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1522 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/19/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

At 02:36 PM 4/18/2007, you wrote:

Sandy and I certainly have no problem being listed but aren’t there.
Please feel free to add us.

Pierre

>On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:38 AM, bruno wrote:
>
> > If I follow the links from the msg, I get two different 404
> > errors. If I navigate through from the homepage, they work.
> >
> > Also, the Geography page lists 238 members, but the Membership page
> > only lists about 156(ish).
>
>Membership page only lists people who set “show my name in the member
>directory.” People who registered before we had that blank in the
>system aren’t shown; we chose to assume “no” rather than assume “yes.”
>
>andy

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1523 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Fun with online membership databases…

I can do it via the admin interface, but in theory you should be able to
log in and do it yourself.

Care to try and see if the process makes sense?

Kevin

Pierre & Sandy Pettinger wrote:

>
> At 02:36 PM 4/18/2007, you wrote:
>
> Sandy and I certainly have no problem being listed but aren’t there.
> Please feel free to add us.
>
> Pierre
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1524 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list
Has anybody even looked at this? The original intent was to create an ongoing database of people who wanted to hear about future CCs & could be mailed to.
If no one’s going to use it or keep it up – what a waste of time.

Nora

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1525 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list

Nora, we definitely NEED this kind of continuity from one con to the next. (We need it with the FFF mailing list of known designers, too!) I haven’t looked at it yet, but I intend to. Little things like life and work keep interfering.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Future CCs Mailing list

Has anybody even looked at this? The original intent was to create an ongoing database of people who wanted to hear about future CCs & could be mailed to.
If no one’s going to use it or keep it up – what a waste of time.

Nora

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.4/768 – Release Date: 4/19/2007 5:32 AM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1526 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Future CCs Mailing list

Has anybody even looked at this? The original intent was to create an ongoing database of people who wanted to hear about future CCs & could be mailed to.
If no one’s going to use it or keep it up – what a waste of time.

Nora

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.4/768 – Release Date: 4/19/2007 5:32 AM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1527 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/20/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list

Hi Nora —

We haven’t used it yet, but are going to.
Right now we are in the middle of wrapping up our PR2 and getting ready
for online hotel reservations to open.
When that announcement goes out (our PRs appear on the website as well)
I know we’ll be using it.

Thanks for the noodge. I’ve downloaded a copy so besides using it for a
special announcement/invitation I can use it to send invites to our
online announcement list.

Kevin

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Has anybody even looked at this? The original intent was to create an
> ongoing database of people who wanted to hear about future CCs & could
> be mailed to.
> If no one’s going to use it or keep it up – what a waste of time.
>
> Nora
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1528 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/21/2007
Subject: Almost done…Really!
Costume-ConNections news (www.Costume-Con.org):

I am pleased to report that thanks to Carl’s collection of DVDs and
Pierre’s willingness to loan same to me until I could get them to a
computer that could read them, all CCs up to CC24 can be said to have an
image for every costume that crossed a stage in competition with the
exception of CC19, and that will be remedied shortly!

In the coming few weeks, subject to my availability, the whims of my
children and the ease of transition, the whole site will be moving to a
new web server. If you notice any weird things going on, it’s possible
you’ve caught the site in transition, so please be patient. When the
site move has been completed, I’ll let folks know!

(And then imagine Kermit doing his happy dance…)

Also: If you wanted to submit your web site for listing on the Links
page, NOW would be a good time to do it. My next task, while I’m waiting
for the CC19 DVD, is to clean out the links of all cobwebs and clear the
What’s New pages.

Any adjustments to the information listed on the site would be very much
appreciated!

Thanks,

Betsy


Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1529 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/22/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list

Sorry to sound whiny but no one even commented when I posted that it was there.
I’ll also have some interesting demographic stats once I get the registration stuff is completely processed.

Nora

“Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair” <chair@cc26.info> wrote:
Hi Nora —

We haven’t used it yet, but are going to.
Right now we are in the middle of wrapping up our PR2 and getting ready
for online hotel reservations to open.
When that announcement goes out (our PRs appear on the website as well)
I know we’ll be using it.

Thanks for the noodge. I’ve downloaded a copy so besides using it for a
special announcement/invitation I can use it to send invites to our
online announcement list.

Kevin

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

>
> Has anybody even looked at this? The original intent was to create an
> ongoing database of people who wanted to hear about future CCs & could
> be mailed to.
> If no one’s going to use it or keep it up – what a waste of time.
>
> Nora
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1530 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/22/2007
Subject: Re: Future CCs Mailing list

In a message dated 4/22/2007 4:17:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
casamai@sbcglobal.net writes:

> Sorry to sound whiny but no one even commented when I posted that it was
> there.
> I’ll also have some interesting demographic stats once I get the
> registration stuff is completely processed.
>
> Nora
>
>
>
>
>

Nora,
Sorry, but I haven’t looked at it either. Been busy with other stuff.
But will look at it soon. Promise!
Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1531 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/25/2007
Subject: Legal question
Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?

We have a situation where we have this person who will remain unnamed for the moment (but I’m pretty sure we’ll give you a warning about them when this is resolved one way or another) where they are pretty much refusing to accept the polcy. We pretty much have them dead to rights here, but they are currently demanding a 50% refund on their membership and 100% of the person they never provided any registration info on. Oh – either that, or forward the money to the next con for membership.

They say now that since they can’t get satisfaction, they will seek legal council. I don’t think they have any legal standing. They won’t provide documentation of emails they claim we never answered, won’t accept our documentation from Paypal that quite clearly shows that they used an email address that they claim they never use. They’re basicaly trying to bully us into giving them their money. They claim they’ve never heard of a con not refunding money (which is clearly a lie. If they weren’t such an ass, I’d be inclined to just give them their money, but there’s no guarantee they won’t try this stunt again.

Any thoughts?

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1532 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:

> Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?
>

There may be variances from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but bascially,
if there’s a published policy, the policy stands.

You could always go with the preemptive strike of contacting PayPal
filing a complaint with them.

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1533 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

Oh, and they will spend more $$$ getting legal counsel than the two memberships are worth, so that’s just an empty threat.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:43 PM
Subject: [runacc] Legal question

Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?

We have a situation where we have this person who will remain unnamed for the moment (but I’m pretty sure we’ll give you a warning about them when this is resolved one way or another) where they are pretty much refusing to accept the polcy. We pretty much have them dead to rights here, but they are currently demanding a 50% refund on their membership and 100% of the person they never provided any registration info on. Oh – either that, or forward the money to the next con for membership.

They say now that since they can’t get satisfaction, they will seek legal council. I don’t think they have any legal standing. They won’t provide documentation of emails they claim we never answered, won’t accept our documentation from Paypal that quite clearly shows that they used an email address that they claim they never use. They’re basicaly trying to bully us into giving them their money. They claim they’ve never heard of a con not refunding money (which is clearly a lie. If they weren’t such an ass, I’d be inclined to just give them their money, but there’s no guarantee they won’t try this stunt again.

Any thoughts?

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/776 – Release Date: 4/25/2007 12:19 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1534 From: Ricky & Karen Dick Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

Most cons will not refund memberships once it’s 30 days out from the con. Most will allow transfers until the con. After that, it’s tough luck. Then, after the con, any no-shows get mailed their registration packets with their badges, con publications, etc. so they have something to show for their membership $$.

Do not let this person bully you. You had a published policy re refunds.

–Karen

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:43 PM
Subject: [runacc] Legal question

Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?

We have a situation where we have this person who will remain unnamed for the moment (but I’m pretty sure we’ll give you a warning about them when this is resolved one way or another) where they are pretty much refusing to accept the polcy. We pretty much have them dead to rights here, but they are currently demanding a 50% refund on their membership and 100% of the person they never provided any registration info on. Oh – either that, or forward the money to the next con for membership.

They say now that since they can’t get satisfaction, they will seek legal council. I don’t think they have any legal standing. They won’t provide documentation of emails they claim we never answered, won’t accept our documentation from Paypal that quite clearly shows that they used an email address that they claim they never use. They’re basicaly trying to bully us into giving them their money. They claim they’ve never heard of a con not refunding money (which is clearly a lie. If they weren’t such an ass, I’d be inclined to just give them their money, but there’s no guarantee they won’t try this stunt again.

Any thoughts?

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

——————————————————————————

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/776 – Release Date: 4/25/2007 12:19 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1535 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

What Andy said. *Especially* if you allowed membership transfers.

And thanks for the reminder to get our refund policy posted.

Kevin

Andrew Trembley wrote:

>
> Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a
> no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full
> refund?
> >
>
> There may be variances from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but bascially,
> if there’s a published policy, the policy stands.
>
> You could always go with the preemptive strike of contacting PayPal
> filing a complaint with them.
>
> andy
>

 

Group: runacc Message: 1536 From: Betsy Delaney Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

I think I’m with Andy here. Preemptive strikes help do two things: Deal
with bullies and tip the company off to potential problems with their users.

Unless they can provide proof of payment for the one that “doesn’t
exist” it’s a non-issue. No record of payment means no payment received,
hence no refund. For the other? It’s your call, but there’s only so much
you can do with a published policy. If they were being nice and
apologetic about the problem, I might think twice. Bullies? Not worth
the time. Karen’s right. Hauling out the lawyer card is an empty threat
and your published policy will cost them money in the end. (Which you
could point out to them if you felt so inclined.)

Sorry it was ugly…

-b

Andrew Trembley wrote:

> Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
>> Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?
>>
>
> There may be variances from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but bascially,
> if there’s a published policy, the policy stands.
>
> You could always go with the preemptive strike of contacting PayPal
> filing a complaint with them.
>
> andy



Betsy Delaney

*************************************************************************
See my resume at: http://www.hawkeswood.com/betsywork.shtml
*************************************************************************

 

Group: runacc Message: 1537 From: David Doering Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Bruce:

I concur with Karen–in addition to SF cons, in my 20+ years of
attending professional conferences and seminars I have routinely seen
the policy that after a certain date there were no refunds. I
understood that if I purchased the membership and then did not ask
for a refund in the allotted time, I was the one out on the price of
admission.

So long as there is a stated policy on refunds, this serves as part
of the “contract” between the buyer and the con that the member accepts.

On a side note, sometimes the fear of attorney fees will be no
obstacle to some people because to them this is a grudge match and
they’re going to prove they are right. But I can’t see any attorney
accepting such a case for the amount charged and the overall size of
the event (ie: no deep pockets).

Yours,

Dave Doering

 

Group: runacc Message: 1538 From: bruno Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

If they do decide to pursue legal action, it’s definitely a small claims court case (<$5000). Maybe you could suggest they try the People’s Court or Judge Judy.

Michael

> ——-Original Message——-
> From: David Doering <dave@techvoice.com>

>
> On a side note, sometimes the fear of attorney fees will be no
> obstacle to some people because to them this is a grudge match and
> they’re going to prove they are right. But I can’t see any attorney
> accepting such a case for the amount charged and the overall size of
> the event (ie: no deep pockets).

 

Group: runacc Message: 1539 From: osierhenry@cs.com Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
Ages ago, in the days before I knew CC existed, I was involved with a con
that only lived two years in Milwaukee. We had a dealer claim that some of his
merchandise had been stolen. Oddly enough, no other dealer was missing anything,
the complaining dealer knew EXACTLY what was missing and what they were
worth.

We dealt with him by having a friend who had been a lawyer write him a letter
that was very thick and solid with legalese stating, basically, Prove it!

The dealer backed down and went away.

So, you might want to consider having a lawyer friend write the person a
letter making policy really clear.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1540 From: Byron Connell Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

There are a couple of different questions here. One is legal. What is Missouri’s law on giving notice of the terms of a contract? Was the policy published on the Web site and in documents such as membership applications and progress reports? I’m not an attorney; however, that may be sufficient notice. If the complainant did not read the notice (or claims not to have read it), that’s not the con’s fault. Under those circumstances, if the complainant takes the con to court, he or she could lose. In that case, the con can ask the court to make the losing party pay all costs of the trial.

A different question is what kind of bad publicity could result from the con’s decision. On the one hand, a decision to hang tough could result in the complainant bad-mouthing the con — and potentially other or all cons. That would be undesirable. On the other hand, a decision to refund the money could lead to similar demands by other attendees as well as potentially making it more difficult for other cons to enforce no-refund policies, which could be a problem for concoms that are strapped for funds.

This may be a case of d____d if you do and d____d if you don’t.

Byron

—– Original Message —–
From: Bruce & Nora Mai<mailto:casamai@sbcglobal.net>
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com<mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:43 PM
Subject: [runacc] Legal question

Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?

We have a situation where we have this person who will remain unnamed for the moment (but I’m pretty sure we’ll give you a warning about them when this is resolved one way or another) where they are pretty much refusing to accept the polcy. We pretty much have them dead to rights here, but they are currently demanding a 50% refund on their membership and 100% of the person they never provided any registration info on. Oh – either that, or forward the money to the next con for membership.

They say now that since they can’t get satisfaction, they will seek legal council. I don’t think they have any legal standing. They won’t provide documentation of emails they claim we never answered, won’t accept our documentation from Paypal that quite clearly shows that they used an email address that they claim they never use. They’re basicaly trying to bully us into giving them their money. They claim they’ve never heard of a con not refunding money (which is clearly a lie. If they weren’t such an ass, I’d be inclined to just give them their money, but there’s no guarantee they won’t try this stunt again.

Any thoughts?

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1541 From: Pierre & Sandy Pettinger Date: 4/26/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

At 10:43 PM 4/25/2007, you wrote:

>Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a
>no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full refund?
>
>We have a situation where we have this person who will remain
>unnamed for the moment (but I’m pretty sure we’ll give you a warning
>about them when this is resolved one way or another) where they are
>pretty much refusing to accept the polcy. We pretty much have them
>dead to rights here, but they are currently demanding a 50% refund
>on their membership and 100% of the person they never provided any
>registration info on. Oh – either that, or forward the money to the
>next con for membership.
>
>They say now that since they can’t get satisfaction, they will seek
>legal council. I don’t think they have any legal standing. They
>won’t provide documentation of emails they claim we never answered,
>won’t accept our documentation from Paypal that quite clearly shows
>that they used an email address that they claim they never
>use. They’re basicaly trying to bully us into giving them their
>money. They claim they’ve never heard of a con not refunding money
>(which is clearly a lie. If they weren’t such an ass, I’d be
>inclined to just give them their money, but there’s no guarantee
>they won’t try this stunt again.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Bruce

I don’t believe any convention is required to refund any membership.
If you buy a ticket to a theatrical production (say to Broadway) and
can’t attend I don’t believe you will get a refund. If you buy
something in a store they are not under any legal obligation to
refund your money regardless of the situation. Most will, but they
don’t have to.

I believe most conventions do not refund memberships.

Pierre

“Those Who Fail To Learn History
Are Doomed to Repeat It;
Those Who Fail To Learn History Correctly —
Why They Are Simply Doomed.

Achemdro’hm
“The Illusion of Historical Fact”
— C.Y. 4971

Andromeda

 

Group: runacc Message: 1542 From: Charles Galway Date: 4/27/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question
I may not see that answer in the same way, since I know a dealer that was at
a convention, and had something stolen, and knew exactly what the item was
worth, and may have been the only dealer that was missing something there.

I think the convention may have given her some compensation.

We had a belly dance show here, and only one vendor reported large losses
(silver jewelry). The show director virtually accused her of lying, and
there was very nearly a lawsuit resultant in the process. I also knew this
vendor (they were regulars at CONduit), and know they did not lie about this
theft. It was quite a nasty arguement, and I felt like it was not handled
very well.

There is something about the original question that reminds me a lot about a
situation described in a recent Haunted House publication. (HauntWorld #15).
Unfortunately, I can’t quite figure out how it helps you specific case…

(The article is called “The psychology of your customers….”) The
situation was where a character-actor accidently bumped into a young lady,
who then comments/complains about being/feeling sexually harassed. (no,
this issue is not about sexual-harrassment, keep reading) The
character-actor follows the written guidelines of the house, and steps
aside, saying “enjoy the rest of the show”. The actor reports the incident,
(thinking it would now be ok). Nope — 6 parents (of the three girls) show
up. Now here’s the psychology commentary…The author points out that that
these folks essentially have a chip on their shoulders, and that his house
just happens to be a convient target. Essentially these folks come from a
social-economic stratum that is fairly “POWERLESS”, hence they over-react to
any percieved wrong.

(He explained a reasonable response (it was an accident, his actor had no
complaint in five years, etc). — All that didn’t matter.) So his approach
was, rather the fight them, or present a more powerful opposition (my lawyer
is bigger than your lawyer), was to let them percieve some empowerment
(without actually giving up very much — they wanted the actors’s name, etc,
which they didn’t get). So he called in his head of security, asked if
the girls had been given a refund, insisted that one be given, and sort of
chewed out security for not having done so already (more just an “act”).
Then gave them the info they might need to write a letter of complaint.
(which they’d probably never write, but it did help them feel more
empowered…)

Yes, he did “buy-off” these annoying folks. But for him, it was cheaper, in
the long run.
———————————–

So it was my impression that you might be dealing with someone of this
annoying nature, and simply either “huffing”, or ignoring them would
increase their sense of injury (“powerlessness”).

But I still can’t quite suggest a good alternative.

Charles Galway

—–Original Message—–
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
osierhenry@cs.com
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:11 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [runacc] Legal question

Ages ago, in the days before I knew CC existed, I was involved with a con
that only lived two years in Milwaukee. We had a dealer claim that some of
his
merchandise had been stolen. Oddly enough, no other dealer was missing
anything,
the complaining dealer knew EXACTLY what was missing and what they were
worth.

We dealt with him by having a friend who had been a lawyer write him a
letter
that was very thick and solid with legalese stating, basically, Prove it!

The dealer backed down and went away.

So, you might want to consider having a lawyer friend write the person a
letter making policy really clear.

Henry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1543 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 4/27/2007
Subject: what are people saying about CC25?
Technorati may be craptacular, but it does provide blog search. I
just wish it did a better job of keeping up with things; I’ve had bad
history with them claiming a blog hasn’t been updated in dozens if
not hundreds of days even though it has.

anyway:
http://technorati.com/search/costume-con?language=en&authority=n
http://technorati.com/search/cc25?language=en&authority=n
http://technorati.com/search/cc26?language=en&authority=n

There’s also Google Blog Search, but it’s even less comprehensive.
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&q=costume-
con&btnG=Search+Blogs
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&q=cc25&btnG=Search+Blogs
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&q=cc26&btnG=Search+Blogs

and if you’ve got a google account, you can set up an email alert
when new index entries appear…
http://www.google.com/alerts?t=8&hl=en&q=costume-con

andy

 

Group: runacc Message: 1544 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

Yeah, I think it’s something that didn’t even cross our minds, last time. This is part of a trend we’ve noticed. Pierre’s gonna have a word with him, and if he still persists, we may follow some of the notions posted here.

We were not really concerned about legal actions, and everyone’s posts here pretty much reaffirm our position.

By the way, we’ve mostly accumulated our notes, so the big Brain Dump will begin soon.

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Legal question

What Andy said. *Especially* if you allowed membership transfers.

And thanks for the reminder to get our refund policy posted.

Kevin

Andrew Trembley wrote:
>
> Bruce & Nora Mai wrote:
> > Not going into details yet, but what are the legalities of having a
> no refund or partial refund policy and someone still demands a full
> refund?
> >
>
> There may be variances from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but bascially,
> if there’s a published policy, the policy stands.
>
> You could always go with the preemptive strike of contacting PayPal
> filing a complaint with them.
>
> andy
>

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1545 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 4/29/2007
Subject: Re: Legal question

Heh. Like that one. 🙂

Bruce

—– Original Message —–
From: bruno
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [runacc] Legal question

If they do decide to pursue legal action, it’s definitely a small claims court case (<$5000). Maybe you could suggest they try the People’s Court or Judge Judy.

Michael

> ——-Original Message——-
> From: David Doering <dave@techvoice.com>

>
> On a side note, sometimes the fear of attorney fees will be no
> obstacle to some people because to them this is a grudge match and
> they’re going to prove they are right. But I can’t see any attorney
> accepting such a case for the amount charged and the overall size of
> the event (ie: no deep pockets).

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1546 From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair Date: 5/5/2007
Subject: Invitations sent to the CC26 mailing lists… thanks to CC25!
Nora —

Thanks for building the spreadsheet; today I used it to send invitations
to our CC26 announcements list.

I also took the time to run through our registration survey results and
send a new round of invitations out to the both the announcements and
chat lists.

Kevin

 

Group: runacc Message: 1547 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/5/2007
Subject: Re: Invitations sent to the CC26 mailing lists… thanks to CC25!

And we received the invitation toady. cool.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: Kevin Roche, CC26 Convention Chair
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Cc: CC26_Marcom@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 5:15 PM
Subject: [runacc] Invitations sent to the CC26 mailing lists… thanks to CC25!

Nora —

Thanks for building the spreadsheet; today I used it to send invitations
to our CC26 announcements list.

I also took the time to run through our registration survey results and
send a new round of invitations out to the both the announcements and
chat lists.

Kevin

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1548 From: Andrew T Trembley Date: 5/11/2007
Subject: Fwd: “Piecework” article

Note from a friend of mine…

Begin forwarded message:

> From: “Sarah Shefferly” <skshefferly@gmail.com>
> Date: May 11, 2007 5:30:45 AM PDT
> To: attrembl@bovil.com
> Subject: “Piecework” article
>
> Hey Andy!
>
> There’s a great article in the May/June issue of “Piecework” about
> costuming/persona creating organizations such as the SCA and
> Costumecon. It even has a list of places on the internet for people
> to get more information. Costumecon is on this list, so you may get
> some interested folks checking you out. Thought you’d like to know.
>
> The author of the article is Pamela Toler. Maybe you know her. She
> seems at least to have done her research, if not to have actually
> spent some time with people who do costuming.
>
> Sarah

 

Group: runacc Message: 1549 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/13/2007
Subject: Re: Fwd: “Piecework” article

Nice little article. I haven’t picked up Piecework in a few years (although I’ve always liked it) but made sure to get this one.

Nora

—– Original Message —–
From: Andrew T Trembley
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:49 PM
Subject: [runacc] Fwd: “Piecework” article

Note from a friend of mine…

Begin forwarded message:

> From: “Sarah Shefferly” <skshefferly@gmail.com>
> Date: May 11, 2007 5:30:45 AM PDT
> To: attrembl@bovil.com
> Subject: “Piecework” article
>
> Hey Andy!
>
> There’s a great article in the May/June issue of “Piecework” about
> costuming/persona creating organizations such as the SCA and
> Costumecon. It even has a list of places on the internet for people
> to get more information. Costumecon is on this list, so you may get
> some interested folks checking you out. Thought you’d like to know.
>
> The author of the article is Pamela Toler. Maybe you know her. She
> seems at least to have done her research, if not to have actually
> spent some time with people who do costuming.
>
> Sarah

View the Document: http://www.Costume-Con.org/procedure/runacc/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

Group: runacc Message: 1550 From: Bruce & Nora Mai Date: 5/22/2007
Subject: CC25 Post -mortem
After a bit of a break (and Nora and I both fighting colds), I’m gonna try to get started on the promised “Brain Dump” I’ve mentioned in the past, adding a few quotes from the Staff. Of course, many of you were on the staff, so some of this won’t be news. But this’ll be for the edification of people who may not have known some of what went on beyond their own departments, and anybody who might read through the list archives at some later date.

Most of you on the list here have worked more than one CC, so much of this will be very familiar. Other stuff, I think you’ll find interesting just from an informational standpoint.

So – Hotel stuff: First of all, most of you already know that checking in to the Hotel on a Wednesday is a good idea for staffers – I recommend taking advantage of the hotel hot tub or pool. You might not get another chance until after the con – if then.

We were very pleased with our hotel venue – we still think booking in the suburbs is a better choice than in the city. Our location was great because it had a lot of businesses nearby for just about everything a convention member might need – food, tools, toys, books, fabric, etc. Granted, not every host city is going to have all these places so close by, but the chances are better in the suburbs than downtown. We really lucked out with the concourse layout that we had, putting all the function space in one place. Some of our staff rooms were located directly behind the function rooms, which made finding staff and getting to Ops much easier. Once again, we have to thank Marty for the great contract model he sent us. Not everything applied to our situation, but it certainly showed the hotel staff we were coming in knowing what we wanted. We struck out a few passages, but I’d say we used 80 – 85% verbatim. Overall, we found the hotel and its staff very co-operative and helpful. We had less than a handful of complaints, and those were dealt with in a timely fashion.

Bruce

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]