Yahoo Archive: Page 54 of 67

 

Messages in runacc group. Page 54 of 67.

Group: runacc Message: 2654 From: ECM Date: 5/28/2014
Subject: from Rebecca Rowan
Group: runacc Message: 2655 From: markptjan Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites
Group: runacc Message: 2656 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites
Group: runacc Message: 2657 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites
Group: runacc Message: 2658 From: Elaine Sims Date: 6/1/2014
Subject: Optimus Time contact
Group: runacc Message: 2659 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 review forming
Group: runacc Message: 2660 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/4/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2661 From: kittythecanuck Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2662 From: kittythecanuck Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2663 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2664 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2665 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
Group: runacc Message: 2666 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – The Hotel
Group: runacc Message: 2667 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Registration
Group: runacc Message: 2668 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: Something for our Canadians…
Group: runacc Message: 2669 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: Re: Something for our Canadians…
Group: runacc Message: 2670 From: casamai Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review –
Group: runacc Message: 2671 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review = the Con Suite
Group: runacc Message: 2672 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Doll Room
Group: runacc Message: 2673 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Friday Night
Group: runacc Message: 2674 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Vendors Room
Group: runacc Message: 2675 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Costume Exhibits
Group: runacc Message: 2676 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/19/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF Masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2677 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2678 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – random SF masque notes/observations
Group: runacc Message: 2679 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC 32 Review – Future Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 2680 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2681 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2682 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC 32 Review – Future Fashion Show
Group: runacc Message: 2683 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2684 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2685 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2686 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2687 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage
Group: runacc Message: 2688 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2689 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/25/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Historical masquerade
Group: runacc Message: 2690 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2691 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Monday Programming
Group: runacc Message: 2692 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: CC32 Demographics observations
Group: runacc Message: 2693 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Wrap up
Group: runacc Message: 2694 From: beckieboo817 Date: 11/24/2014
Subject: Costume Con 36 Bid
Group: runacc Message: 2695 From: beckieboo817 Date: 12/8/2014
Subject: Timelines for conventions
Group: runacc Message: 2696 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2697 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2698 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2699 From: beckieboo817 Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2700 From: ECM Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2701 From: dandyhank Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2702 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?
Group: runacc Message: 2703 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 


 

Group: runacc Message: 2654 From: ECM Date: 5/28/2014
Subject: from Rebecca Rowan

 

 


From: rebecca8175@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 20:59:52 -0700
Subject: Re: FW: [runacc] Invites
To: ecmami@hotmail.com

I joined before CC30.  I’ve been on here for 2 years now…

 

Rebecca Rowan
(858) 245-8170

“Acceptance is the answer to all my problems today…..

 

 

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM, ECM <ecmami@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hey, lady, there was a problem inviting you to join the runacc group.  Please click & join.  It’s really a valuable place to be.  Trust me.


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 18:50:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Invites

 

Whelp,

I tried. One of the two email addresses I received successfully translated into an invitation to join the list.
The other (Rebecca Rowan’s) was disabled – the specific error said something about not allowing invites from the group.
Please feel free to send it to whomever you think will want to be part of the list.
And, for those of you still on it, now’s a great time to decide whether you still want to be here or you’d rather unsubscribe. The Unsubscribe link is below.

 

Thanks!

Betsy

 



Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2655 From: markptjan Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites

Thanks for the invite! I’m here now. I’ll make a note to poke Natalie to join up as well. We also have Caitlin Thompson, who will be assuming actual Treasurer role and responsibilities. I’ll be moving over to vice-chair with Natalie. My strengths tend to be logistical and promotional, rather than financial.

I haven’t use Yahoo Groups much, so is there a way we can get an invite for Caitlin? She’s caity.thompson@gmail.com. Thank you!

 

Group: runacc Message: 2656 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites

 

 

Welcome!   I’ll be posting a review of CC32 from the St. Louis Costumers Guild soonish, which I post every year.   It might give you insights for your own con for the future, along with comments from those on the list here, as most are former CC chair people.

 

Bruce

CC16, CC25

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 2:23 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Invites

Thanks for the invite! I’m here now. I’ll make a note to poke Natalie to join up as well. We also have Caitlin Thompson, who will be assuming actual Treasurer role and responsibilities. I’ll be moving over to vice-chair with Natalie. My strengths tend to be logistical and promotional, rather than financial.

I haven’t use Yahoo Groups much, so is there a way we can get an invite for Caitlin? She’s caity.thompson@gmail.com. Thank you!

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2657 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 5/31/2014
Subject: Re: Invites

I’ve invited everyone I’ve seen so far who wasn’t already on the list.

As I said previously, if you’re still on the list and you’d prefer not to be, you’re welcome to follow the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the message, though I do think that it’s valuable to have folks who’ve been through the process stick around as mentors (which was the original point of this list).
Thanks,
Betsy

 

 

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:14 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Welcome!   I’ll be posting a review of CC32 from the St. Louis Costumers Guild soonish, which I post every year.   It might give you insights for your own con for the future, along with comments from those on the list here, as most are former CC chair people.

 

Bruce

CC16, CC25

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 2:23 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Invites

 

Thanks for the invite! I’m here now. I’ll make a note to poke Natalie to join up as well. We also have Caitlin Thompson, who will be assuming actual Treasurer role and responsibilities. I’ll be moving over to vice-chair with Natalie. My strengths tend to be logistical and promotional, rather than financial.

 

I haven’t use Yahoo Groups much, so is there a way we can get an invite for Caitlin? She’s caity.thompson@gmail.com. Thank you!

 

 





Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 2658 From: Elaine Sims Date: 6/1/2014
Subject: Optimus Time contact
Good morning!!

I need some help from one of the CC32 staff. Thanks to the lateness of
the hour, I dropped the ball on getting the contact information for
Optimus Time, who received the Dreamcatcher award from SiliconWeb. The
joys of talking with people in costume, when they’re in a different
costume (or street clothes) you may not recognize them…

Thank you!

Elaine Sims
SiWeb VP
CC33 & CC30 Quilt Show Coordinator

 

Group: runacc Message: 2659 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/1/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 review forming

 

 

Just a heads up – our review is being put together.   I’ll post it soon-ish.    For the next three cons and a bid, it has a few useful takeaways for department heads.

Just as a preview, there was not much to complain about, organizationally,  the way this con was run.  Several “minor” criticisms about stuff that could have been handled differently – no con is perfect – but maybe some of the same mistakes won’t be repeated if some of the observations are kept in the back of people’s minds.

Bruce

Assistant Archivist

International Costumers Gallery  http://www.costume.org/gallery2/main.php

ICG Youtube channel:   http://www.youtube.com/user/ICGArchives/feed

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2660 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/4/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con

 

 

This time’s review is culled from 7(?) people’s opinions, as not as many of us made the drive this time.  

The Future Fashion Folio came out in a reasonable amount of time.   It was smallish – some of us were not inspired by what was chosen to be published.   Hardly any designs that could be done up were for a more mature age.  Also, there weren’t many designs for males – in fact, there were less than in a usual Folio.   Otherwise, it was “okay”.

The patterns chosen for the Single Pattern show were not very interesting to us – but that was just us.   It was good that they decided to try something different, but the costume patterns were sort of an odd choice.  Clearly, they appealed to some people – but there’s a huge caveat which we’ll talk about a little later.

Communication from Staff was pretty good.  

Promotion for CC32 –   Beyond Cosplay.com, all we saw was Facebook as the main info dissemination point.  But not everyone does FB and even fewer go to Cosplay.com.   For many of the “old guard”, the D list is still the primary news source – the next three cons and the bid should make a note of this.   

There’s an argument to be made about how much promotion a con should do beyond the local area.  To  be honest, roughly 2/3 of your CC attendance is going to be from within roughly a 300 mile radius.   But the other 1/3 are the regulars, and you don’t want to alienate them by keeping them in the dark.   Most people are not going to visit the con website for information.  (Some said CC32 was not kept updated – I can’t speak to that – I was one of those who didn’t visit the website much)

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2661 From: kittythecanuck Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
As someone involved in running CC35 and thus specifically told to make a note to use this – what is a D list?

 

Group: runacc Message: 2662 From: kittythecanuck Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con
As one of the people running CC35 and thus specifically told to make a note of this – what is a D list?

 

Group: runacc Message: 2663 From: Kevin Roche Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con

They are referring to the ICG discussion Yahoo group mailing list, aka “ICG-D” or, in their abbreviation, the D list.

Kevin

On Thursday, June 5, 2014, caity.thompson@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

As one of the people running CC35 and thus specifically told to make a note of this – what is a D list?

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2664 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con

ICG-D@yahoogroups.com

You don’t have to be a member of the International Costumers’ Guild in order to belong to the list. Costume-Con and the ICG are separate, but they were and remain (at least in some part) connected:
Betsy

 

 

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, caity.thompson@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

As someone involved in running CC35 and thus specifically told to make a note to use this – what is a D list?

 

 





Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

Group: runacc Message: 2665 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Before the con

Sorry.   Shorthand.   Have to remember that.

 

Bruce

 

Group: runacc Message: 2666 From: casamai Date: 6/5/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – The Hotel

 

Kind of expensive, at least for us, but it’s Canada.   At least the exchange rate was a little more favorable.   At least the parking was significantly discounted for the con.  The rooms were nice, VERY nice beds.   Nora and I were on the Club floor, which in Sheratons, have a separate amenities room with light breakfasts and snacks at other times – that can help save on food costs.   We first encountered this at Teslacon a couple of years ago.   We didn’t get to make use of that because it was taken over for the Con Suite, which was on the top floor.   Since the Con Suite did generally serve some breakfast foods every day, it wasn’t that big a deal to us, but it must have been irritating for other hotel guests who weren’t members of the con.  

 

The hotel staff were okay – they acted quickly to resolve a broken hot tub and an elevator during the weekend.  We suspect because they’re near the airport, the hotel can’t afford to put off repairs like we’ve run into at other cons.  The layout of the hotel seemed to be pretty good – no real traffic choke points, and it handled well  the 1000+ costume enthusiasts that wandered through.  Funny thing is, it never seemed all that crowded.   There were plenty of places to sit and socialize, so that was good.  By our experiences, the pool was pretty large & and the hot tub was okay.  The hotel restaurant was typical for the prices – we only went to it twice.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2667 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/8/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Registration

 

 

It was good that it was open on Thursday evening, but like others, we missed having “swag bags” – membership materials were limited to the Program book and the pocket schedule.   Given the resources available in Toronto, the next committee sought to look into the possibilities of freebies – it would be good advertising for local merchants. 

 

Despite the number of attendees, we never saw much of a line of people waiting for registration, so that was good – maybe that was because 3/4s of the memberships were pre-regs?

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2668 From: Andrew Trembley Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: Something for our Canadians…

You’re changing the world. We want to help. http://googlefornonprofits.blogspot.com/2014/06/youre-changing-world-we-want-to-help.html

Free cloud IT infrastructure for Canadian nonprofits too!

 

Group: runacc Message: 2669 From: Kaijugal . Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: Re: Something for our Canadians…

 

Thank you for posting Andy!

Dawn McKechnie – President – Fibre Fantasy Artists of Canada Emoji


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:29:04 -0700
Subject: [runacc] Something for our Canadians…

 

 

You’re changing the world. We want to help. http://googlefornonprofits.blogspot.com/2014/06/youre-changing-world-we-want-to-help.html

Free cloud IT infrastructure for Canadian nonprofits too!

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2670 From: casamai Date: 6/9/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review –

 

There seemed to be a good spread of subjects, even if we didn’t get to many.   As near as we could tell, almost all of them were well attended.  I can tell you about the ones Nora and I were part of.

The “My First Costume-Con” Friday , which we were part of, was the better attended of the two.   The second one, on Saturday, still had a good handful of people.  We didn’t need any translations, but we were glad he was there.

“Judging Ethics” – Nora sat on this Saturday 9:00 AM panel, and it was surprisingly well attended.  Many people had opinions as well as questions.

We had two Road Show slots instead of the normal one on Monday.  The one-hour Saturday slot was subtitled “Randomness” because we just sort of picked stuff at will.    Didn’t have many people show up for it – could be because of the title – more on that in a bit.   The Monday Road Show was moderately successful – we suspect that we didn’t have as many people show up because the con was mostly made up of new people and most of the CC vets at the con may have left for home.

 

The Bookercon Masquerade Judging Simulation was close to a bust.   We had one person show up, but we went ahead and played it anyway.  

 

The Future Fashion Folio PowerPoint presentation was only moderately successful.

 

I managed to get to the Tying a Turban panel.  The speaker was personable and had good presence.  I think I may’ve actually learned how to do it, and I’ll have to give it a try.

 

Nora said the Ball Jointed Doll meetup pretty much consisted of those who were running the Doll exhibit and didn’t leave the room all weekend.  It was sort of awkward.   Perhaps it would have been less so if it had been guided.

As for the Cat Helpers meetup, nobody showed up except us and Genie.

 

The Heroes of Cosplay panel was possibly our best-attended.   It was very active  and everyone had opinions.  Interestingly, we had two other panelists who were participants in the new season to be aired this week – one was a contestant at one of the venues and the other was a judge.   Talking with them and other members of the audience gave us another new, fresh perspective.   As usual, we learned even more behind the scenes info that continued to show how slimy the production company is.  Our co-panelists seemed to think that they weren’t manipulated, but it’ll be interesting to see how the episode was edited for drama.

 

Something of a note to ourselves (but also for Programming people) for future reference is to have more of a descriptive title for the pocket program and not so creative.   We’ve heard more than once that no one reads the Program Book, so it’s critical to get across the panel concept in the small amount of space on the Pocket Program.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2671 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review = the Con Suite

 

 

The staffers seemed a bit schizophrenic at times.   We wondered if they weren’t prepared for the number of people who came through?   Some seemed “prickly” – maybe there was something going on behind the scenes.  In one instance, people were waiting outside of the room at 8:00, and someone inside was pointing at their watch, saying it was 7:50. 

There were some strange food choices in the con of the non-sponsored variety – not sure whether this was by choice or supplied.  At least half the time, the sodas were off-brand – they tasted okay, but a lot of people didn’t like it.  People like their name brand sodas, so figure that into your Con Suite budget.    Same for some of the snacks.   One persons said some of the choices were “downright disgusting!”   But having hot dogs served throughout the weekend was a welcome protein entry in an otherwise sugared and other strange stuff fare.   The SLCG=sponsored Sunday morning Protein breakfast sponsorship went over well, but I think it ran out too soon.   More chapters and other organizations should be encouraged to provide snacks/food other than the future CC committees.   Heck, for that matter, sponsor Green room snackage.

It seemed at times the staffers were having difficulty keeping up with supplies.   We also wondered if some of the CC attendees understood the purpose of the Con Suite and missed out.  Maybe some from the anime community may have been uncomfortable about taking advantage of it? 

The suite itself was not the best laid out, but at least it had tables and chairs for sitting to eat- that’s a plus.  The TV at one end running various anime and Doctor Who episodes wasn’t too distracting, since the volume was down. 

At one point in one evening, the Con Suite did get some noise complaints from people on the same floor not part of the convention.   Gotta watch that, when you don’t have the whole floor.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2672 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Doll Room

 

 

The doll Costume contest was small – only 7 or 8 entries?.  But, it was smart to fill the room with exhibits. .  To Nora, it didn’t seem like the staff promoted the show enough.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2673 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Friday Night

 

 

The Friday Night Social theme was semi-successful, with the few themed snacks, games and vampire maid waitresses (a twist on the popular maid cafe activity that is common at anime cons, if you don’t know).  Something that is apparently also common up there, due to the large crowds, was people lining up an hour or more beforehand to get into the big events over the weekend.   Those of us of a mature age are used to being able to just stroll in and find a comfortable seat or a corner to stand in.  

The FNS room was crowded, probably because tables were not well laid out.  Also, since many people were standing, it was hard to see the stage for the Single Pattern Show, so it was a good thing that there were two projection screens.   Food ran out early, so by the time the Single Pattern Show participants got out of the Green Room, it was mostly gone.   Probably another oversight because there were more people attending CC than the staff expected.

Speaking for the majority of SLCG people who had and opinion on the subject: Future SPS Directors can either make or note or not.   The original intention of the Single Pattern show is similar to the Future Fashion Show – it’s a >fashion show<, less like a masquerade.    The Director made some rookie mistakes, but I can’t point fingers because I was guilty of some pretty glaring errors when I did the CC0 FFS.   Nonetheless, make sure have copies of the  images of the patterns for the judges to refer to.    

Most importantly, for future Show Directors, make sure it is understood ahead of time that the final result  of the Single Pattern interpretation LOOK RECOGNIZABLE AS THE GARMENT THE PATTERN IS FOR.  What happened at CC32 was that about 3/4 of the entrants thought that they could just use the pattern pieces to create completely different outfits.  As one of the three judges, and the most experienced, I should have insisted that we should judge the entries based on how well they interpreted the pattern while remaining accurate to the design, but one of the other 2 judges said “I recognize the pieces used in this outfit”.    That’s not the same thing.  So you had wings fashioned from the mermaid tail piece and a dress made up of the paper pattern pieces themselves.  So while there were some nice outfits, they mostly did not look like Mermaid Tails. 

In light of that only ¼ of the entries looked anything like either the Werewolf or Mermaid patterns, we judged the entries more like a costume contest – which again, is not the point of the Single Pattern show.  We also wound up giving more awards than just 1 or 2, because that’s what the show director allowed for.    Repeating, this is supposed to be an informal show, not a masquerade.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2674 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Vendors Room

 

 

It was pretty good sized, had variety, but not much that at least half of us personally needed.   The stuffed animals sold very well.  No book dealers and not all that many patterns. 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2675 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/12/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Costume Exhibits

 

 

Saw maybe 20 costumes or so, all Canadian, not surprisingly.   Some we’ve seen before (Jackie Ward and Barb Schofield’s) and others not.   The room may’ve limited the ability to show more outfits.   There may have been a little swapping out, as we saw at least instance of exhibit costumes worn in the hall (the dinosaur raptors).  Not as broad a selection as CC31 had.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2676 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/19/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF Masquerade

 

 

Things of note: There were a lot more females on stage than normal.  Part of the reason, no doubt, is because of the large number of younger people who attended.   Once again, there  was an early line for getting seats for the show, and the line wranglers were a bit loud and obnoxious – probably because of who they’re used to dealing with.   The show itself had the highest number of recreation entries ever – possibly only 5 out of the 87 were original.  This was not surprising, considering the fan base CC was pulling from.   There were some interpretations of media characters – makes us wonder if there will be temptation to try something more original if they attend another CC. 

The following is strictly opinion, so take it with a grain of salt.      —   Quality of the masquerade was …okay.  Most of the presentations were not all that exciting, and many of them still went a little too long.  There was a lot of pretty stuff that didn’t stand out above the rest, but there was no crap, either.   Most of the costumes did not have much of a “wow” factor to them, with a few exceptions.  Cheering for contestants was mostly because the audience either recognized their favorite character (common at anime cons) or it was their friends.

Judging was fast and efficient – it only took the panel 45 minutes to judge all the entries.   The award percentage was about right for both Presentation and Workmanship – somewhere around the 1/3 mark.   It was a long evening, nonetheless – with the show, photo line, video presentations, chapter awards, other announcements and then the awards, not winding up until 1:30 AM.  

From the judges viewpoint, it was disappointing for them to watch because there were very few surprises.  First of all, most of the costumes had been seen in the hall in the two days prior to the show – the con did not discourage this because it’s sort of normal for anime cons.  Second, the “polaroids” of the contestants were attached to their entry forms, so the judges knew what was coming before the contestant even hit the stage.   Note for future MDs – judges are humans too – these two factors made it less fun for them.

Another note for future MDs:  Something that made the show drag a bit – the director arranged the entries in Skill Division order so that most of the Novices came first, then Journeymen, then Masters, with just a little overlapping between the groups.   We’re guessing the idea was that this would have the show build to a peak.  What resulted was not many interesting Novices, a mixture of quality of Journeyman presentations, and then finally, the Masters.   It’s better to mix the classes up so that there is more variety.

Something that I and a few others found really distracting was the “ninjas”.   We know that Anime North’s stage crew are quite frequently part of the entries at that masquerade.   Usually, it’s to be “killed” or otherwise serve as a human prop.   But they also would fill time with dancing when there was a delay in the show.   Here,  they appeared onstage at CC so frequently to the point that they were taking away from the performance of the costumer.  And there were several presentations in a row where one or more of the “ninjas” were on stage.  Nora observed that this seemed to be more of a Novice entry thing, as they had not learned how to perform by themselves yet, so they used the “ninjas” as the focus of the comedic entries.  Because of the way the show was arranged by succeeding division class, the “ninjas” were seen less and less on stage as the night went on.

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2677 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

 

I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.

 

Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.

Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been problematic.

Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).

The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.

There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  

Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.

By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.

Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2678 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – random SF masque notes/observations

 

 

I had produced a new, more comprehensive video memorial for Marty Gear, to be shown at the halftime.   It was well received, but many people who knew Marty (mostly East Coasters) were not there. 

Props to Ricky Dick in the Green Room and later in the show, explaining about CC traditions like the awards are presented at the end of the evening, not posted the next day as they frequently are at anime cons.    There’s also the chapter awards, the videos the photo run, and so on.  “This is what our community does”.  Not sure how much of it sunk in, but we’ll see.  

Not everyone participated In the photo run.   In fact, many entrants bailed on the award announcements and headed for the Costumers Suite, thereby wiping out much of the refreshments before anyone else got there.   Boo.   Can’t totally fault the Suite crew, though – no one knew the show would run so late.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2679 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC 32 Review – Future Fashion Show

 

 

It was of average size, and if you compare it in percentage to the number of attendees, it was small.  The show was very “staged”- each person had their own music track provided by the crew.   This came in for some criticism:   I  appreciated the music being appropriate to the design,  <but> this did not allow for last-minute additions, thus forcing one person to enter F/SF masquerade instead.  There was no excuse for that.  Lack of flexibility cannot be tolerated.  I showed up at my first CC with 2 folio designs that I had made up; they didn’t know I was doing this.  If I had been told they wouldn’t take me, and that I should enter a masquerade instead, I would have been super pissed off – and that rejection would have made me wary of attending again.  Do not do this – EVER.”

 Once again, divisions were announced as part of the entries.   Again, we felt this was unnecessary.   

The Simplicity Pattern show, presented by designer Andrea Schewe, was well received.  

Additional notes by others:   Keep the tradition of allowing multiple people to do the same design.   This will encourage more people  to participate if they can do their first choice.  

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2680 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

 

One other note – green room snacks came late, and there weren’t enough.

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.

 

Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.

Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been problematic.

Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).

The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.

There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  

Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.

By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.

Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2681 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming

 

 

I think I overlooked this one previously.

There seemed to be a good spread of subjects, even if we didn’t get to many.   As near as we could tell, almost all of them were well attended.  We can tell you about the ones we were part of.  

 

The “My First Costume-Con” panel was scheduled twice.  The Friday one, which we were part of, was the better attended of the two.   The second one took place Saturday.  “Manu”, a French Canadian we had met at CC29, was our third panelist.   We didn’t need any translations, but we were glad he was there.

Our first attempt at the Archives panel called “The Storytellers” was an attempt to gather costumers’ stories by showing video clips and then recording their voices.   Unfortunately, we had some technical problems, and not many attendees.   And frankly, we could have been more organized.   We’ll need to retool this before attempting it again.   That said, we did gather a bunch of good stories at the “Costuming Horror Stories” panel.   We got to relate one or two that horrified the younger audience, so that was entertaining.

“Judging Ethics” – Nora sat on this Saturday 9:00 AM panel, and it was surprisingly well attended.  Many people had opinions as well as questions.

 

We had two Road Show slots instead of the normal one on Monday.  The one-hour Saturday slot was subtitled “Randomness” because we just sort of picked stuff at will.    Didn’t have many people show up for it – could be because of the title – more on that in a bit.   The Monday Road Show was moderately successful – we suspect that we didn’t have as many people show up because the con was mostly made up of new people and most of the CC vets at the con may have left for home.

 

The Bookercon Masquerade Judging Simulation was close to a bust.   We had one person show up, but we went ahead and played it anyway.   Our one “judge” was very interested, and she was very thoughtful – she made some interesting choices unlike past judges.   That possibly could be because she had no one else to debate with.

The Future Fashion Folio PowerPoint presentation was only moderately successful.   It’s a possibility that most attendees didn’t know much about the FFF.

 

I managed to get to the Tying a Turban panel.  The speaker was personable and had good presence.  I think I may’ve actually learned how to do it, and I’ll have to give it a try.

 

Nora said the Ball Jointed Doll meetup pretty much consisted of those who were running the Doll exhibit and didn’t leave the room all weekend.  It was sort of awkward.   Perhaps it would have been less so if it had been guided.

 

As for the Cat Helpers meetup, nobody showed up except us and Genie.

 

The Heroes of Cosplay panel was possibly our best-attended.   It was very active  and everyone had opinions.   Two of the other panelists  were participants in the new season – one was a contestant at one of the venues and the other was a judge.   Talking with them and other members of the audience gave us another new, fresh perspective.  

 

Something of a note to ourselves for future reference is to have more of a descriptive title for the pocket program and not so creative.   We’ve heard more than once that no one reads the Program Book, so it’s critical to get across the concept in the small amount of space on the Pocket Program.   This may be why the Judging Simulation panel failed.

 

Notes by others – we all pretty much agreed that the choices of subjects were pretty well-varied.   One commenter said: seemed to be a good mix of the usual panels run by the usual people and the usual panels run by new people and new panels.  There were also some workshops for which a fee was charged.  It would have been nice if those were pointed out on the pocket program.  Bold type face, asterisk, something.  It’s a little awkward to go to a panel only to discover it’s a workshop and you should have paid a fee.

Another:  Almost no one came to the panel I was on. *sadface*  My other panelist was surprised I had handouts; apparently she had planned to wing it.  Um – really?

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2682 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC 32 Review – Future Fashion Show

 

Fashion show comments as the director
frist, you’re just wrong. at least in the assumption that this persons critique is valid
the website said pre
reg by ( whatever day) while it was weeks later than I thougt it would be, I was still taking people up to the date posted very clearly on the website, ( I think was  the day before the con) and was very flexible in doing so even tho it was theatrically staged just like half the fashion shows in CC history.
Someone new, 1 person, fell through the cracks on this. a bad thing to be sure, but I wont take the full blame on that,she will have to share it. and at least we got her into as show somewhere , and she was
awesome.
everyone who had ever been to a cc before, registered early in plenty of time, and none of the old guard said anything about the need to register
I personally like a scripted show and special music,( so you’re not wrong there just difference of opinion) I have done this more than a few times for cc now. in the past few years I have felt the costumes in the fashion show were great, but the show itself was boring as hell. well run, no foul ups, the directors did well and made a choice, I made another
also, you are  wrong in that the divisions where NOT read with the entries by the MC at least as far as I knew.
They were not in his script, and I cant imagine he would know them all to drop them in. I don’t have a copy of the video to check this tho.
If the judges, at their discresion, mentioned divisions in their awards, well, I am fine with that
the size of the show,it was small as a percentage of the con for sure, because it is a totally new concept to them up there.
but I will hold it up against the 5 yes 5 entries in milwaukee and feel okay about what we did
things I did not like that happened?
both the tech crew and the photographer, decided they needed the day off , and of course I didnt know that untill 1am sat night
so the fact that we had any at all, is a testament to toronto fandom, pulling it out of thier butts and doing a great job, but it was not a good thing to have happen
Gravely MacCabre
http://www.castleblood.com
http://facebook.com/gravelymaccabre
http://www.etsy.com/shop/gravelymaccabre
tv show clip samples at
http://www.veoh.com/channels/castleblood
On Sunday, June 22, 2014 2:21 PM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It was of average size, and if you compare it in percentage to the number of attendees, it was small.  The show was very “staged”- each person had their own music track provided by the crew.   This came in for some criticism:   I  appreciated the music being appropriate to the design,  <but> this did not allow for last-minute additions, thus forcing one person to enter F/SF masquerade instead.  There was no excuse for that.  Lack of flexibility cannot be tolerated.  I showed up at my first CC with 2 folio designs that I had made up; they didn’t know I was doing this.  If I had been told they wouldn’t take me, and that I should enter a masquerade instead, I
would have been super pissed off – and that rejection would have made me wary of attending again.  Do not do this – EVER.”
 Once again, divisions were announced as part of the entries.   Again, we felt this was unnecessary.   
The Simplicity Pattern show, presented by designer Andrea Schewe, was well received.  
Additional notes by others:   Keep the tradition of allowing multiple people to do the same design.   This will encourage more people  to participate if they can do their first choice.  

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2683 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

Rehersals for SF/F
what we had to end up doing to try to make sure we had time for everyone who really needed rehersals, was
if Anne Marie and I knew the person fron Anime North, we asked if the basic AN version of tech was fine, and if they said yes, we mentioned they probably wouldnt need a rehersal then cause they knew how it would be. BUT we also said, however, at CC you have the right to rehearse if you want
and made it their choice.
this is from a different post, but I agree the use of the ninjas got WAAAAAYYYY out of control, so much so, that even AN is re thinking what they do now.
picking up a prop? cool
Carryiong off a dead guy?? cool
being 8 people in your skit cause you didnt have 8 costumers to do it with, NOT COOL !! LOL
I am trying to just shrug it off as their enthusiasm for trying to be wonderful at CC. cause even the ones that have been doing this for many years up there, where nervous as hell calling it a CC stage
Gravely MacCabre
http://www.castleblood.com
http://facebook.com/gravelymaccabre
http://www.etsy.com/shop/gravelymaccabre
tv show clip samples
at
http://www.veoh.com/channels/castleblood
On Sunday, June 22, 2014 2:36 PM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

One other note – green room snacks came late, and there weren’t enough.
 
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage



I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.
 
Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.
Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been
problematic.
Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).
The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was
woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.
There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  
Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official
photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.
By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.
Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 



 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2684 From: Gravely MacCabre Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

not sure why I am doing the double post thing, sorry everyone
Gravely MacCabre
http://www.castleblood.com
http://facebook.com/gravelymaccabre
http://www.etsy.com/shop/gravelymaccabre
tv show clip samples at
http://www.veoh.com/channels/castleblood
On Sunday, June 22, 2014 7:12 PM, “Gravely MacCabre
gravelymac@yahoo.com [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Rehersals for SF/F
what we had to end up doing to try to make sure we had time for everyone who really needed rehersals, was
if Anne Marie and I knew the person fron Anime North, we asked if the basic AN version of tech was fine, and if they said yes, we mentioned they probably wouldnt need a rehersal then cause they knew how it would be. BUT we also said, however, at CC you have the right to rehearse if you want
and made it their choice.
this is from a different post, but I agree the use of the ninjas got WAAAAAYYYY out of control, so much so, that even AN is re thinking what they do now.
picking up a prop? cool
Carryiong off a dead guy?? cool
being 8 people in your skit cause you didnt have 8 costumers to do it with, NOT COOL !! LOL
I am trying to just shrug it off as their enthusiasm for trying to be wonderful at CC. cause even the ones that have been doing this for many years up there, where nervous as hell calling it a CC stage
Gravely MacCabre
http://www.castleblood.com
http://facebook.com/gravelymaccabre
http://www.etsy.com/shop/gravelymaccabre


tv show clip samples
at
http://www.veoh.com/channels/castleblood


On Sunday, June 22, 2014 2:36 PM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



One other note – green room snacks came late, and there weren’t enough.
 
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage



I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.
 
Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.
Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been
problematic.
Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).
The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was
woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.
There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  
Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official
photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.
By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.
Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 





 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2685 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming

 

My comment appears at the end.

 

Byron

 

On Jun 22, 2014, at 3:11 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

I think I overlooked this one previously.

There seemed to be a good spread of subjects, even if we didn’t get to many.   As near as we could tell, almost all of them were well attended.  We can tell you about the ones we were part of.  

 

The “My First Costume-Con” panel was scheduled twice.  The Friday one, which we were part of, was the better attended of the two.   The second one took place Saturday.  “Manu”, a French Canadian we had met at CC29, was our third panelist.   We didn’t need any translations, but we were glad he was there.

Our first attempt at the Archives panel called “The Storytellers” was an attempt to gather costumers’ stories by showing video clips and then recording their voices.   Unfortunately, we had some technical problems, and not many attendees.   And frankly, we could have been more organized.   We’ll need to retool this before attempting it again.   That said, we did gather a bunch of good stories at the “Costuming Horror Stories” panel.   We got to relate one or two that horrified the younger audience, so that was entertaining.

“Judging Ethics” – Nora sat on this Saturday 9:00 AM panel, and it was surprisingly well attended.  Many people had opinions as well as questions.

 

We had two Road Show slots instead of the normal one on Monday.  The one-hour Saturday slot was subtitled “Randomness” because we just sort of picked stuff at will.    Didn’t have many people show up for it – could be because of the title – more on that in a bit.   The Monday Road Show was moderately successful – we suspect that we didn’t have as many people show up because the con was mostly made up of new people and most of the CC vets at the con may have left for home.

 

The Bookercon Masquerade Judging Simulation was close to a bust.   We had one person show up, but we went ahead and played it anyway.   Our one “judge” was very interested, and she was very thoughtful – she made some interesting choices unlike past judges.   That possibly could be because she had no one else to debate with.

The Future Fashion Folio PowerPoint presentation was only moderately successful.   It’s a possibility that most attendees didn’t know much about the FFF.

 

I managed to get to the Tying a Turban panel.  The speaker was personable and had good presence.  I think I may’ve actually learned how to do it, and I’ll have to give it a try.

 

Nora said the Ball Jointed Doll meetup pretty much consisted of those who were running the Doll exhibit and didn’t leave the room all weekend.  It was sort of awkward.   Perhaps it would have been less so if it had been guided.

 

As for the Cat Helpers meetup, nobody showed up except us and Genie.

 

The Heroes of Cosplay panel was possibly our best-attended.   It was very active  and everyone had opinions.   Two of the other panelists  were participants in the new season – one was a contestant at one of the venues and the other was a judge.   Talking with them and other members of the audience gave us another new, fresh perspective.  

 

Something of a note to ourselves for future reference is to have more of a descriptive title for the pocket program and not so creative.   We’ve heard more than once that no one reads the Program Book, so it’s critical to get across the concept in the small amount of space on the Pocket Program.   This may be why the Judging Simulation panel failed.

 

Notes by others – we all pretty much agreed that the choices of subjects were pretty well-varied.   One commenter said:seemed to be a good mix of the usual panels run by the usual people and the usual panels run by new people and new panels.  There were also some workshops for which a fee was charged.  It would have been nice if those were pointed out on the pocket program.  Bold type face, asterisk, something.  It’s a little awkward to go to a panel only to discover it’s a workshop and you should have paid a fee.

Another:  Almost no one came to the panel I was on. *sadface*  My other panelist was surprised I had handouts; apparently she had planned to wing it.  Um – really?

My 5/4 comment about programming was: “I was not able to get to any panels I was not on.  However, my three all were well attended.  On Monday afternoon, the two-hour Historical Masquerade show-and-tell was virtually standing room only for the entire two-hour period!”

Byron

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2686 From: Sarah A Bloy Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

One thing that I would like to point out…

There was kind of a lot of pressure on people not to do a tech rehearsal.  When I signed up, it was *technically* my choice, yes, but there was a lot of looking at me sideways and double-checking.  I think at one point I was actually asked “are you actually completely SURE that you need it?”  It made me rather uncomfortable because it sort of made me feel guilty for needing to take a slot.  And I know of one or two people who decided not to do a tech rehearsal because of that.

If this does become an issue again in the future (a good problem to have, mind you) it would be greatly appreciated if masquerade staff could be a little more conscious of people’s anxieties about putting themselves out there.  But more importantly, please be careful not to make people feel guilty for needing to take the time.

– Sarah

 

On June 22, 2014, at 6:12PM, “Gravely MacCabre gravelymac@yahoo.com [runacc]” wrote:

 

 

 

 

Rehersals for SF/F
what we had to end up doing to try to make sure we had time for everyone who really needed rehersals, was
if Anne Marie and I knew the person fron Anime North, we asked if the basic AN version of tech was fine, and if they said yes, we mentioned they probably wouldnt need a rehersal then cause they knew how it would be. BUT we also said, however, at CC you have the right to rehearse if you want
and made it their choice.
this is from a different post, but I agree the use of the ninjas got WAAAAAYYYY out of control, so much so, that even AN is re thinking what they do now.
picking up a prop? cool
Carryiong off a dead guy?? cool
being 8 people in your skit cause you didnt have 8 costumers to do it with, NOT COOL !! LOL
I am trying to just shrug it off as their enthusiasm for trying to be wonderful at CC. cause even the ones that have been doing this for many years up there, where nervous as hell calling it a CC stage
On Sunday, June 22, 2014 2:36 PM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

One other note – green room snacks came late, and there weren’t enough.
 
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage



I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.
 
Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.
Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been
problematic.
Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).
The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was
woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.
There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  
Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official
photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.
By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.
Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 



 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2687 From: Byron Connell Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage

 

In comparison, we told Historical masquerade entrants that tech rehearsal was absolutely mandatory and that they would be scratched if they did not participate.  I regard it as a safety thing; as MD, I want to know what they’re doing before it’s too late..  Of course, we didn’t have the “problem” of 88 entries.

 

Byron

 

On Jun 22, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Sarah A Bloy berzerker.prime@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

 

One thing that I would like to point out…

 

There was kind of a lot of pressure on people not to do a tech rehearsal.  When I signed up, it was *technically* my choice, yes, but there was a lot of looking at me sideways and double-checking.  I think at one point I was actually asked “are you actually completely SURE that you need it?”  It made me rather uncomfortable because it sort of made me feel guilty for needing to take a slot.  And I know of one or two people who decided not to do a tech rehearsal because of that.

If this does become an issue again in the future (a good problem to have, mind you) it would be greatly appreciated if masquerade staff could be a little more conscious of people’s anxieties about putting themselves out there.  But more importantly, please be careful not to make people feel guilty for needing to take the time.

– Sarah



On June 22, 2014, at 6:12PM, “Gravely MacCabre gravelymac@yahoo.com [runacc]”  wrote:

 

Rehersals for SF/F
 
what we had to end up doing to try to make sure we had time for everyone who really needed rehersals, was
 
if Anne Marie and I knew the person fron Anime North, we asked if the basic AN version of tech was fine, and if they said yes, we mentioned they probably wouldnt need a rehersal then cause they knew how it would be. BUT we also said, however, at CC you have the right to rehearse if you want
 
and made it their choice.
 
this is from a different post, but I agree the use of the ninjas got WAAAAAYYYY out of control, so much so, that even AN is re thinking what they do now. 
picking up a prop? cool
Carryiong off a dead guy?? cool
 
being 8 people in your skit cause you didnt have 8 costumers to do it with, NOT COOL !! LOL
 
I am trying to just shrug it off as their enthusiasm for trying to be wonderful at CC. cause even the ones that have been doing this for many years up there, where nervous as hell calling it a CC stage 
 
 




On Sunday, June 22, 2014 2:36 PM, “‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc]” <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



 

One other note – green room snacks came late, and there weren’t enough.
 
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 1:10 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – F & SF backstage



I was the only one competing from our group this year, so this is mostly my opinion alone, except where noted.
 
Tech – Apparently, the crew was minimal – many of the ones who work at Anime North and would have worked this con got hired away recently.  Nonetheless, the crew they had were friendly and co-operative and knew what they were doing.
Rehearsal slots were limited, for practical purposes.   Those who competed at AN with the same costume last year got no rehearsal time, with a few exceptions.  Sometimes, this decision was a little arbitrary.   I can understand the logic, though – trying to do tech rehearsals for 88 entries would have been problematic.
Like CC31, lighting was provided by banks of LEDs.   It’s ultimately cheaper to run, but this has an unfortunate tendency to throw a cool blue light on everything.   You’d think people would figure out how to put filters on them to fix that.    There was supposedly a black light for use by contestants, but it was probably unnecessary.    It was nice to have the two projection screens so that the audience could see more detail to the costumes.   And for the first time in a few years, there was a green room video feed (sans audio).
The one thing that comes in for criticism was the Green Room.   Again, because of the unexpected numbers of attendees, there were more entries.   The Green Room size was woefully inadequate.   They had us sitting in rows of chairs across from each other, and that was our “den” – no tables.   In fact, part of the outside hall had to be curtained off to provide more space for dens.   It didn’t help that there were a number of costumes/set pieces that had a large “footprint”.
There was a miscommunication about when people could get into the Green Room – at tech rehearsal, we were told we could get in as early as 5:00, but that didn’t happen.   As a result, there was a long line parallel to the queue for masquerade show seating and we didn’t start getting checked in until around 6:00.  
Another communication problem centered around making sure the entrants got both their polaroids and official photography.   A small part of this may have been the language barrier, since there were French Canadians as well as the English speaking den people.   Nonetheless, overall, the backstage crew was pretty good and otherwise well-organized, coping with the huge number of people.
By the end of the evening, the SF MD was losing their voice.   Perhaps because they were French Canadian, they read the awards in French first, and then barely got the words out in English, leaving people wondering what the award was for.   If you’re going be bilingual, you should be sure to give equal clarity and weight to the announcements.  For that matter, if you’re losing your voice, it would be better to just relinquish the duty to someone else, like the judges.
Critique from the judges – the entry forms had the Skill Divisions on them, but not whether the entry was a recreation or original, which is very important when there is no documentation. 





 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2688 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 6/22/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming

First, I think I saw the original post, but clearly it needed reposting, so glad you did.

Second, if the Show and Tell session is becoming a regular event, then I am immeasurably happy. To me it’s awesome to get an opportunity to see how an award-winning (or just nifty) costume or prop was created for stage, which I might get a whole minute to see before it zips by, never to be seen again.
I would encourage ALL CC program planners to slot times for each masquerade on the day following, for the purpose.
I know it’s tough to get up in the morning and drag stuff down again, but the reward is worth the effort. I promise.
Thanks,

Betsy

 

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

My 5/4 comment about programming was: “I was not able to get to any panels I was not on.  However, my three all were well attended.  On Monday afternoon, the two-hour Historical Masquerade show-and-tell was virtually standing room only for the entire two-hour period!”
Byron
Betsy Marks Delaney

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2689 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/25/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Historical masquerade

 

 

Opinions varied – Byron, as MD,  can make his own comments, if he wishes,

It seemed like a lot of people may not have provided their own music?   Some people unfamiliar with the format didn’t know what to do Byron confirmed this.     So tech provided some choices.    Many sound tracks had sort of the same tone.    

 

Original comment:   “Almost everyone in the show, but two, got awards.   In our opinion, this is creeping award inflation.   If they’re all that good, perhaps the bar for quality needs to be raised, otherwise there’s hardly any  point to having a “competition”.  And if only one or two people do not get awards, what message does that send?   You might as well just eliminate the awards.”

 

Follow up: There was some disagreement about this, because not everyone got awards in all three categories.   But almost everyone seemed to get >something<, which led to that perception.

The presentations themselves were mostly uninspiring, but at least there were no overly long ones.   There were only a few entries that stood out for being different and there were no ethnic entries, a little surprisingly.

 

There was a printed program for the show, which was nice,  but it was hard to read.   Judge deliberations took longer, for a smaller show, even with having pre-judged the day before.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2690 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: Re: SLCG CC32 Review – Programming

 

 

Hey, if it works, it works.   Something to build Monday programming on.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 8:13 PM
To: List, Run a CC
Subject: Re: [runacc] SLCG CC32 Review – Programming

First, I think I saw the original post, but clearly it needed reposting, so glad you did.

Second, if the Show and Tell session is becoming a regular event, then I am immeasurably happy. To me it’s awesome to get an opportunity to see how an award-winning (or just nifty) costume or prop was created for stage, which I might get a whole minute to see before it zips by, never to be seen again.

I would encourage ALL CC program planners to slot times for each masquerade on the day following, for the purpose.

I know it’s tough to get up in the morning and drag stuff down again, but the reward is worth the effort. I promise.

Thanks,

Betsy

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Byron Connell byronpconnell@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

My 5/4 comment about programming was: “I was not able to get to any panels I was not on.  However, my three all were well attended.  On Monday afternoon, the two-hour Historical Masquerade show-and-tell was virtually standing room only for the entire two-hour period!”

Byron

Betsy Marks Delaney

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2691 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Monday Programming

 

 

Speaking of Monday….

Not much going on, but that’s usually the case, however it did run until 2:00, rather than the usual 12:00.   Only one or two tours for Monday, in comparison to before the con.   Apparently, a lot of the Old Guard that did come to the con did not stick around through Monday, this time.   The Archives Road Show didn’t have that many people in the audience, probably for that reason.   Good thing Byron’s thing went well.

 

The pool party that started at 7:00 pm, and was relatively successful, even if  we didn’t know many people there.   Hey, at least there was a hot tub this time.

 

The Con Suite Dead Dog party was said to be open until 10:00, but apparently it was open even later than that.   Guess the staff was hoping people still might eat some of the less popular food left over.   My guess is, they still had stuff they had to throw out.  

 

Note to future Costumer Suite people:  Don’t cheap out on the soda and buy off-brands.   You’ll have less of it at the end of con.  People prefer the major companies.    And some places where you buy in bulk will let you return unused portions.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2692 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: CC32 Demographics observations

 

 

Not surprisingly, the crowd skewed much younger than we usually see – a great percentage were in their 20s.   There were more male costumers at this CC.  The most Asians we’ve ever seen at a CC – kinda cool.    As mentioned, not as many of the CC regulars came to this con  – possibly for economic reasons?   The hotel halls were mostly filled with recreation costumes, because there was heavy promotion with the Anime North crowd.  There were not many original creations, but there were a few interpretations of media costumes.   It’ll be interesting to see if returning people stretch themselves beyond those interpretations in three years.   A lot of those wound up on the stage later, since the staff didn’t discourage waiting to reveal their creations.   At least the attendees were better behaved, most of the time, so there wasn’t the immature atmosphere of some anime cons.  They were willing to talk to different people, and didn’t keep to themselves too much.   We also saw several families in attendance.     Will CC 35 get as many people next time?  We’ll see.  Also, will CC influence any Anime North entries next year?   All the online reviews of the con have been pretty positive.   That’s good.

As near as we can tell, everyone who entered the masquerades were honest about what skill level they should enter at. 

We get the impression that Anime North guides the less experienced people more at their masquerade, but it makes for a more homogenous show.  The audience was more engaged in the CC shows, but they also had to be shushed a few times because of what they are used to at other cons.   Some of them were cheering or chanting for friends, which is not really done at CC.

A lot of the Canadians may not wind up going outside of the US for another CC – sort of like the Californians – why would they need to leave Toronto with so many cons?    We may see an uptick of attendance at Madison, in two years, but don’t imagine we’ll see many of them show up at Charleston.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2693 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 6/28/2014
Subject: SLCG CC32 Review – Wrap up

 

 

Uniquely, official photos were free.   A photographer was paid an upfront fee, so all  attendees were sent a link to download all the pictures from a website (although the resolution was limited to good pictures roughly 5″ x 7″, which is usually good enough for most people).  Not sure how the trademark holder will get those, since there’s no disc, but that should not be forgotten.

Overall, we had a pretty good time, and gave the con a good solid A (or if you go by numbers, anywhere from an 8 to 10 out of 10, depending on who you talk to)

 

Well done, Dawn and staff.   Yours will be a measuring stick by which future cons will be judged by.  This will be vitally important to keep in mind for keeping the younger people coming back.

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2694 From: beckieboo817 Date: 11/24/2014
Subject: Costume Con 36 Bid

Karen Schnaubelt is pleased to announce that I have won the right to bid on Costume Con 36 in 2018 in San Diego. If you want to make sure it happens, please go to the website for Costume Con 33 and buy a supporting membership for $25. http://cc33charleston.org/wp/membership/  For that supporting membership, you get all of the con publications including the Future Fashion Folio and progress reports and then are qualified to vote. Also, if interested in the ICG you can vote on any decisions they’re making.

 

Then in May, you can help guarantee us win by filling out a proxy and sending your $10 voting fee with me to the convention.  I submit it to the site selection committee, they tally the votes and announce the winner at the historical masquerade on Sunday night.

 

What I’m wanting to do for the convention’s theme is Ports of Call. Because of San Diego being a military town, I figured that was a good theme. But it doesn’t have to be present or historical or even military related.

 

So, please help me win this bid.

 

Rebecca Rowan

 

Beckieboo817@yahoo.com

 

P.S. anyone willing to help via advice, physical work or just support, let me know

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2695 From: beckieboo817 Date: 12/8/2014
Subject: Timelines for conventions

This last weekend, I attended SMOFCon.  Granted, it’s skewed towards WorldCons and not smaller cons but I came away with ideas.  On Friday, I attended a seminar on facilities. Saturday morn, they had a panel on timelines and that brings me to why I’m writing. I’ve asked Kevin Roche and Dawn McKechnie for one and I’ve got Elaine Mami helping me but could I get timelines for some of the more recent cons and maybe some of the future ones of what they’re planning on getting done when or what they had done by when. Like, I’m 5 months out from the vote at CC33. Now, I know that usually, we didn’t worry about opposing bids but after last year, I’m trying to be prepared. So, what would or did you do leading up to winning the bid?

 

Okay, you’ve got the bid now what?  I know the biggest thing is find a facility and get the word out. Did you feel you needed to have certain things done by a certain time?  I know that when we get within the 2 year mark, is when the masquerades start gearing up, especially, Future Fashion Folio.  What else did you do?

 

Dawn has said she’s sending me some thoughts on what she felt she did wrong and what she did right. I’ve got historical financial and member info from CC30, 31 and hopefully 32 and if I remind Kevin, 26. I’m wanting to do this right and do this well so that everyone has an enjoyable time, including Elaine and I.

 

So, thanks in advance for anyone who sends me info.  You can send it directly to me at Rebecca8175atgmaildotcom.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2696 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

I’ve noticed that there’s almost no traffic on this list anymore.   Is it still of use?  Have we answered all the questions ever needed to be asked, or do the various new bids that come in each year confident that they know how to run a Costume-Con?   (Seemingly, more of the same old mistakes are made than new ones).   Just askin’…..

Bruce

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2697 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

It’s a great question. Anyone?

-b

 

 

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:22 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’ve noticed that there’s almost no traffic on this list anymore.   Is it still of use?  Have we answered all the questions ever needed to be asked, or do the various new bids that come in each year confident that they know how to run a Costume-Con?   (Seemingly, more of the same old mistakes are made than new ones).   Just askin’…..

 

Bruce

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2698 From: Byron Connell Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

I think it’s still relevant.  My impression is that it does get traffic after each CC, especially by the newly landed committee.  The last message was in December; however, it discussed the correspoindent’s experience at SMOFcon.  Those of us with more experience probably have more direct connections; however, we’re the ones who can address questions posed by newbies.

 

Moving the old discussions to an archive in which they’re sorted by topic and date and using the archive link on the runacc site might make it easier for new con-runners to find material, cut down on repeat questions, and maybe lead to new questions.  It also could make it easier for new concoms to avoid the old mistakes, and just make new ones!
Of course, the problem will be finding someone to do this.
Byron

 

 

On Mar 23, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Betsy Marks Delaney aramintamd@gmail.com [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It’s a great question. Anyone?

-b

 

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:22 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:



I’ve noticed that there’s almost no traffic on this list anymore.   Is it still of use?  Have we answered all the questions ever needed to be asked, or do the various new bids that come in each year confident that they know how to run a Costume-Con?   (Seemingly, more of the same old mistakes are made than new ones).   Just askin’…..

 

Bruce





 

Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2699 From: beckieboo817 Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

I can’t get to my Yahoo group to answer but I’ve come to it a couple of times, and asked questions with virtually no answers given. Bryan answered a question I asked last December but he was the only one.

 
I sent this to Bruce earlier because I couldn’t get on to the groups earlier. I think it’s a good place to come for answers. It may not always seem relevant and may have slow traffic but I do think it’s pertinent and a great resource…Because I’ve gone back through the old emails to read what people have done and not done…It is a helpful place to go.

 

Group: runacc Message: 2700 From: ECM Date: 3/23/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

I’ve always found it very helpful.  Now that we’re looking forward to CC36 – please everyone, VOTE! – I expect most of our committee and staff in San Diego will join.  Most of them (again) have never been to a CC, but are willing to learn.

Elaine


To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
From: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:05:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [runacc] Is this list still relevant?

 

It’s a great question. Anyone?

-b

 

 

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:22 AM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I’ve noticed that there’s almost no traffic on this list anymore.   Is it still of use?  Have we answered all the questions ever needed to be asked, or do the various new bids that come in each year confident that they know how to run a Costume-Con?   (Seemingly, more of the same old mistakes are made than new ones).   Just askin’…..

 

Bruce

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/

 

 

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2701 From: dandyhank Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2702 From: Nora & Bruce Mai Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

Group: runacc Message: 2703 From: Betsy Marks Delaney Date: 3/24/2015
Subject: Re: Is this list still relevant?

As an archive, it costs nothing to continue. Unless or until Yahoo decides groups are finished, I don’t see a particular reason to kill the list. Do folks generally agree with me? I doubt that moving to a format like Facebook would be useful, since the ability for folks to see posts depends on whether users have blocked each other. Blocking isn’t an option in a mailing list group, though members can certainly turn posts off.

There are ways to participate that don’t involve the Yahoo interface. I receive messages in my own mailbox and respond to them there. If you use the Yahoo interface exclusively, would you please drop me a line and let me know how that’s working for you? I’m curious.
Thanks,
Betsy

 

 

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:10 PM, ‘Nora & Bruce Mai’ casamai@sbcglobal.net [runacc] <runacc@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Hm.  Well, looking back, beyond what I posted after CC32, there has been almost no traffic since then.    And unless I deleted a few in my folder, there were a whopping 10 emails between that and the CC31 review.   So, this is becoming less an active list as it is an archive l(little a) list of discussions past.

 

Bruce

 

From: runacc@yahoogroups.com [mailto:runacc@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:24 PM
To: runacc@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [runacc] Re: Is this list still relevant?

 

 

I strongly believe this group is still relevant. I agree with Byron, that there is more traffic here right after CC, but for the ones coming up, such as Madison, Toronto 2, and San Diego, if I remember right, will need the opinions of those of us who have run a CC before them. I know they have direct contact with some of us vets, but more is always better for some answers. And calming nerves.

Henry Osier
Two Time Member of the Never Again Club

 

 

 


Betsy Marks Delaney

http://www.hawkeswood.com/